2027: Nigeria Needs Issue-Based Political Discourse and Genuine Leadership

By: Dr James Bwala

Going through the pages of newspapers, the drama that is taking over Nigeria’s approaches to the 2027 presidential elections is disconcerting. The pattern that dominates the political landscape speaks less of the personalities falling over themselves as the days unfolded. Politicians are fixated more on personal attacks and partisan squabbles than on substantive discussions about national challenges and solutions. This trend is not only counterproductive but also detrimental to Nigeria’s democratic progress and socio-economic development. For a country grappling with profound insecurity, widespread poverty, and pervasive corruption, the electorate deserves leaders who prioritise meaningful dialogue about policies and governance rather than engage in divisive rhetoric and political mudslinging.

The current state of political discourse reveals a troubling shift away from issue-based debates towards an obsession with personalities and irrelevant vendettas. A glaring example is the recent exchange between supporters of President Bola Tinubu and former Vice President Atiku Abubakar. When an Atiku supporter lambasted President Tinubu by questioning the public’s knowledge of his father, it exposed not only the pettiness of political arguments but also their irrelevance to the electorate’s pressing concerns. Ironically, the same critic forgets that Atiku himself has little public discourse about his own paternal background, underscoring how such personal attacks add no value to the presidential contest. More importantly, the lineage or parentage of these candidates bears absolutely no relevance to their ability to govern Nigeria effectively or address the nation’s myriad problems. Yet, this shallow focus distracts from urgent national issues that demand serious attention.

Similarly, Tinubu’s supporters have largely resorted to celebratory chants like “On your mandate we shall stand” instead of articulating and showcasing the tangible achievements or policy successes under the Tinubu-Shettima administration. Such displays may cultivate loyalty among core supporters but do little to persuade undecided voters or sceptics who seek evidence of competent governance. What Nigerians require are detailed outlines of policy frameworks and measurable progress reports on security, economic reforms, healthcare, education, and anti-corruption efforts—outcomes that directly impact daily lives. The absence of these critical conversations speaks volumes about the superficiality permeating political campaigns.

The disturbing episode involving Bishop Onayinkon and the Sultan of Sokoto further exemplifies the politics of distraction. While these revered figures occasionally become embroiled in political controversies, the essential “table” where politicians should lay down concrete plans remains conspicuously empty. Whether in the ruling party or the opposition, there is scant evidence of genuine engagement with the core issues undermining Nigeria’s stability and prosperity. Instead, time and resources are expended on symbolic gestures or media-driven theatrics rather than strategic policymaking and governance innovation.

As the opposition coalition attempts to regroup, with Atiku and Peter Obi supporters exploring alliances like the new G-100 coalition, numerous questions arise. For the new G-100 coalition, numerous questions loom large. Can these groups, historically divided by ideology and political ambition, genuinely reconcile and formulate a cohesive governance blueprint? Or will their efforts devolve into another round of factionalism and power struggles that fail to address Nigeria’s fundamental needs? The success or failure of such coalitions will significantly influence Nigeria’s political trajectory, underscoring the imperative for unity premised on substantive policy alignment rather than mere electoral arithmetic.

Giving this background, the broader socio-political context cannot be ignored. Nigeria’s challenges are deeply entrenched and multifaceted. Insecurity remains pervasive, with insurgency, banditry, kidnappings, and communal conflicts destabilising communities and eroding citizens’ confidence in government protection. Simultaneously, poverty continues to ravage millions, with economic inequality starkly visible in urban slums and rural hinterlands alike. Corruption, the perennial cancer afflicting governance structures, persists despite institutional anti-corruption agencies’ existence, largely due to weak enforcement, political interference, and lack of transparency.

Regrettably, government bodies tasked with combating these challenges have yet to deliver tangible results that speak at the grassroots level. Public trust in institutions is waning, and this vacuum often fuels apathy or cynicism during elections. Adding to the complexity, grassroots conversations across Nigerian towns and villages reveal a palpable anxiety about the future. Voters whisper tentative plans, alliances, and expectations ahead of 2027, signifying both hope and uncertainty. These silent discourses often escape mainstream political narratives but are crucial indicators of public sentiment and priorities.

From all indications, a critical juncture lies ahead. The political actors have a clear choice: continue with self-serving battles and distractions that risk further destabilising Nigeria’s fragile democracy, or rise above partisan bickering to offer authentic leadership grounded in ideas, solutions, and national interest. Nigerians deserve a “full table” of ideas—a comprehensive agenda addressing insecurity, poverty alleviation, systemic corruption, economic diversification, infrastructure development, education reform, and social cohesion. Without this, the elections risk becoming a mere spectacle of personalities rather than a genuine exercise in democratic renewal.

The fact remains that the 2027 Nigerian presidential elections must transcend the current culture of personal attacks and symbolic posturing. For Nigeria to progress, politicians must shift focus from criticising each other’s lineage or engaging in hollow celebrations to presenting substantive plans that respond to the nation’s critical challenges. The electorate deserves leaders who speak boldly about what they can contribute to Nigeria’s development and who demonstrate commitment to transparent governance and inclusive growth. Only through such a transformation in political discourse can Nigeria hope to build a more secure, prosperous, and united future. The days ahead will reveal whether Nigerian politicians choose to build bridges or deepen divisions—but the stakes could not be higher for the country and its people.

• James Bwala, PhD, writes from Abuja.
• 2027: Nigeria Needs Issue-Based Political Discourse and Genuine Leadership

“I Have Never Been Wrong About Vice President Kashim Shettima in Over 1,000 Articles” – Dr James Bwala.

By: Lazarus Balami

Writing about politicians is one of the most difficult tasks in the field of journalism. This is because politicians themselves do not understand who they are in words and actions, and such breeds different pictures of what they are now and the next moment, especially highly experienced and intelligent ones like Nigeria’s vice president, Kashim Shettima. In the realm of political analysis and reportage, consistency and accuracy often separate mere commentators from credible and influential voices. Dr James Bwala, a distinguished analyst, recently asserted that he has never been wrong about Vice President Kashim Shettima throughout his extensive career, spanning over 1,000 articles following one personality. This bold claim is not merely an expression of personal pride but a testament to meticulous research, grounded insights, and steadfast commitment to factual integrity.

Those who read his writings, those who knew him and those that rode the field with him, and yours sincerely, as a professional examining this assertion, I can authoritatively say that it is very important to explore why Dr James Bwala’s insights into Vice President Kashim Shettima’s political journey—from his tenure as governor of Borno State to his current role as Nigeria’s vice president—have been consistently accurate and impactful. I chose to interview Dr Bwala and to write this piece to appreciate the importance of his stand and rigors political analysis that helps millions understand how Vice President Shettima’s character and leadership have validated such assessments.

Many journalists attested to Dr Bwala’s track record and testified that it owes much to his profound understanding of the socio-political context of Borno State and Nigeria at large. During Shettima’s tenure as governor from 2011 to 2019, Borno State was engulfed by the insurgency of Boko Haram—a crisis marked by widespread violence, displacement, and humanitarian catastrophe. Many analysts struggled to accurately assess the complexity of the conflict and the government’s response. However, Dr Bwala’s reports stood out for their nuanced comprehension of both the security challenges and the socio-economic undercurrents influencing them. Rather than succumbing to sensationalism or reductive narratives, despite his turning relationship with his friend and colleague, who was Governor Shettima’s spokesperson at the time – speaking of the late Malam Isa Gusau – Dr Bwala offered comprehensive analyses that factored in the local dynamics, Shettima’s policies, and the evolving nature of the insurgency.

Vice President Kashim Shettima’s leadership during these trying years demonstrated resilience, pragmatism, and strategic vision, qualities Dr Bwala meticulously documented. Shettima’s approach combined military cooperation with concerted efforts to rehabilitate displaced persons, rebuild critical infrastructure, and stimulate economic recovery. A drive late, Isa Gasau praised and spoke of Dr James Bwala as a core professional in his field. I also recalled Ahmed Salkida’s description of Dr Bwala as a brave journalist during an interview owing to his approach to reports during the height of the crises in the north-east. Dr Bwala’s evaluations recognised that, while Shettima faced enormous obstacles, his administration made noteworthy progress in stabilising the region and restoring hope to its people. These assessments were borne out by subsequent developments: improved security conditions, returnees resuming livelihoods, and gradual resumption of education in previously inaccessible areas.

I have read and followed hundreds of Dr Bwala’s precision in reporting, which has been bolstered by his reliance on credible sources and firsthand accounts. He engaged extensively with local communities, government officials, security agencies, and international partners operating in the region even while working as a humanitarian and journalist. This immersion ensured that his writings were not only timely but also reflected ground realities often missed by external observers. The authenticity of his information enabled him to avoid the pitfalls of misinformation, which frequently plagued coverage of personalities, the state and the broader North-east Nigeria conflict zone.

Transitioning from Shettima’s governorship to his elevation as vice president, Dr Bwala’s consistent accuracy persisted due to his vigilant observation of the politician’s evolving role on the national stage. Vice President Shettima now occupies a position demanding not just regional expertise but also statesmanship, diplomacy, and a capacity to influence broad governance agendas. Dr Bwala’s commentary has highlighted Shettima’s deft navigation of Nigeria’s complex political landscape—his ability to build alliances, address national security concerns, and advocate for developmental initiatives attuned to the needs of marginalised communities. These analyses have increasingly portrayed Shettima as a unifying figure capable of bridging ethno-religious divides, fostering inclusive governance, and championing reforms.

Sceptics might question the infallibility implied by Dr Bwala’s statement regarding never being wrong. Yet it is crucial to acknowledge that political analysis, unlike empirical sciences, involves interpretation and prediction amidst fluid circumstances. Dr Bwala’s claim is better understood as an affirmation of his rigors standards and the enduring validity of his core assessments concerning Vice President Shettima’s leadership qualities and impact. Instances where tactical details might have shifted do not diminish the overarching truths he has reliably conveyed about Shettima’s integrity, commitment, and effectiveness. He never shakes on his stance with the vice president, Kashim Shettima. Even when pointers to the rumour of dropping Shettima as President Tinubu’s running mate were high and voices supporting Shettima ebbed, his piece reassuring was constant almost on a daily basis.

The consistency of Dr Bwala’s analyses has contributed positively to public discourse. Coming in an era where misinformation and partisan distortions abound, his balanced and verified reports offer a dependable compass for policymakers, scholars, and citizens seeking to understand one of Nigeria’s most influential leaders. He sets a high bar for accuracy and context and exemplifies the important role that responsible journalism plays in democratic societies.

Dr James Bwala’s declaration of never having been wrong about Vice President Kashim Shettima over more than one thousand articles is a reflection of his continued dedication to truth-telling and insightful political analysis. Through his detailed examination of Shettima’s governance of Borno State amidst insurgency challenges and his ongoing contributions as vice president, Dr Bwala has demonstrated unparalleled accuracy, contextual sensitivity, and analytical depth. His work has not only affirmed the significance of Vice President Shettima’s leadership but also underscored the indispensable value of rigors, fact-based reportage in shaping informed public opinion and guiding effective governance. Such committed analysis faithfully charts the contours of Nigeria’s political landscape and appropriately assesses its leaders.

• Balami, Publisher/Columnist 08036779290

“I Have Never Been Wrong About Vice President Kashim Shettima in Over 1,000 Articles” – Dr James Bwala.

Fubara Declares Support for Tinubu, Chinda, Says Rivers Political War Is Over

By: Michael Mike

Rivers State Governor, Sir Siminalayi Fubara, has announced his support for President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s second-term ambition and the governorship aspiration of Hon. Kingsley Ogundu Chinda, saying political differences in the state have been resolved and that the time for confrontation is over.

Fubara made the declaration on Wednesday during the groundbreaking ceremony of the Riven Medical Industries Project in Port Harcourt, where he said previously opposing political camps in Rivers had reached an understanding to work together for peace and development.

The governor said he had aligned with the “Rainbow Coalition,” a political movement associated with former Rivers State Governor and Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, and urged his supporters across the state to support candidates under the platform ahead of the 2027 general elections.

“We have made peace in the state and I am supporting our Rainbow Coalition. President Bola Ahmed Tinubu is our president, and is the one we are supporting. OK Chinda is the governorship candidate that I am supporting and anybody who believes in me will support him and every other candidate that is under the Rainbow Coalition,” Fubara said.

He added that he had returned to the political family, insisting that Rivers State must move beyond past disagreements.

“I’ve gone back to our family. So, please, whoever you are, give your total support to the Rainbow Coalition. We need to move forward. The time of war is over. It is time for peace and this peace is taking us to another level,” he said.

Fubara urged his supporters not to claim allegiance to him alone but to support the broader political arrangement, stressing that he was committed to unity and stability in the state.

“I’m not party to anything that will bring any form of disunity in this state. I’ve done what I need to do and we are moving forward,” he stated.

The governor also used the occasion to highlight the significance of the Riven Medical Industries Project, describing it as a major step towards industrialisation, healthcare development, and economic expansion in Rivers State.

However, he warned investors against abandoning commitments after receiving government support, recalling past experiences where agreements with investors resulted in disputes and legal battles.

According to him, the state government approved the project because of confidence in the investors’ ability to revive the facility, create employment opportunities, and contribute to economic growth.

He tasked the investors to adhere strictly to project timelines, particularly ensuring the completion of the first phase within three months, while appealing to host communities and the Obio/Akpor Local Government Area leadership to provide an enabling environment for the project.

The Riven Medical Industries Project is a Public-Private Partnership between the Rivers State Government and Enbay Pharmaceutical Industries Limited, aimed at transforming the former Integrated Medical Industries (IMI) into a pharmaceutical manufacturing hub.

When completed, the facility is expected to produce pharmaceutical formulations, gelatine capsules, intravenous infusions, and Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (API), boosting local drug production capacity and reducing Nigeria’s reliance on imported medicines.

The project is also projected to create thousands of direct and indirect jobs, promote technology transfer, attract investment, and strengthen Nigeria’s healthcare supply chain.

The development comes as political activities intensify ahead of the 2027 general elections, with alliances and realignments expected to shape contests across states.

Fubara Declares Support for Tinubu, Chinda, Says Rivers Political War Is Over