Harassment of Muslim Women in Maiduguri Hospitals: An Assertion Amidst an Alarming Increase in Terrorist Activities in Nigeria’s Northeastern Region. 

By: Dr. James Bwala

The recent allegations made by the Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC), led by its director, Professor Ishaq Akintola, claim that security checks imposed on Muslim women trying to access certain hospitals in Maiduguri constitute harassment. This assertion comes amidst an alarming increase in terrorist activities in Nigeria’s northeastern region, particularly in Maiduguri, which has seen a resurgence in violence and attacks. 

While the intention behind these security measures is ostensibly to protect patients and healthcare providers from potential threats, the implications of these allegations deserve critical analysis. Indeed, the tensions between security measures meant to safeguard communities and the potential for such measures to be perceived as discrimination or harassment may have revealed that MURIC’s claims are inadvertently an attempt to create vulnerabilities within the healthcare sector, particularly during a time when accessibility to medical facilities is crucial.

While I take a critical review of the statement by MURIC, I feel it is necessary to understand the broader context of security in Maiduguri. The city has been at the forefront of a prolonged conflict instigated by Boko Haram and other militant groups. The threat posed by these organizations has resulted in severe security protocols across various public domains, including hospitals. Security checks are designed to mitigate the risks associated with terrorist infiltration, ensuring that individuals entering sensitive areas, such as medical facilities, do not pose a security threat. However, these measures often require a delicate balance between maintaining safety and respecting the rights of individuals, particularly marginalized groups such as women and religious minorities.

MURIC’s allegations highlight the perception of bias against Muslim women who may feel unfairly targeted by security checks resembling racial or religious profiling. The notion that specific demographic features can lead to increased scrutiny and inconvenience raises ethical questions about fairness and equity within security protocols. Security personnel must be trained to conduct their duties without prejudice, ensuring that all individuals receive equitable treatment irrespective of their ethnicity, religion, or gender. Any failure to uphold these standards can exacerbate existing tensions and engender a sense of mistrust between the community and authorities.

In critiquing MURIC’s stance, it is essential to recognize the potential implications of their claims. While the organization seeks to advocate for the rights of Muslim women, their allegations could unintentionally offer cover for those with malicious intentions. If terrorists identified a chink in the security apparatus due to the controversial claims put forth by MURIC, they could exploit this situation to gain easier access to hospitals—or worse, perpetrate attacks there. The current security climate necessitates vigilance and strict adherence to procedures designed to thwart terrorist operations. Thus, the line between legitimate protest against perceived discrimination and enabling dangerous entities must be navigated with caution.

READ ALSO: https://newsng.ng/troops-neutralise-four-iswap-terrorists-rescue-two-hostages-in-gajiram/

Moreover, it is worthwhile to consider what constitutes harassment. For many, harassment alludes to actions that create an intimidating, hostile, or offensive environment. While security checks undoubtedly add a layer of inconvenience, especially for vulnerable groups such as women, they are enacted with the aim of preserving human life and preventing violence. It becomes vital to distinguish between legitimate security practices and systemic discrimination. It is also important to question whether MURIC’s framing of the situation is unproductive, potentially creating further divisions and conflicts within the community, rather than fostering dialogues aimed at constructive solutions.

In examining the responses of relevant stakeholders, state governments, and health authorities in the region, it is important to emphasize the need for comprehensive dialogue. Stakeholders must engage in discussions with community representatives, including organizations like MURIC, to explore the nuances surrounding security measures without dismissing legitimate concerns raised by citizens. Targeted conversations can pave the way for improved protocols that guarantee safety while minimizing the risk of perceived profiling and harassment.

Communication strategies play a significant role in alleviating tensions; thus, hospitals should transparently communicate the reasoning behind security protocols to educate the public. An effort should be made to explain the necessity of thorough checks and how these measures significantly contribute to a safer environment for everyone, regardless of background. Open dialogues can cultivate an atmosphere of trust and cooperation among residents, enhancing their participation in security efforts while addressing concerns voiced by organizations like MURIC.

READ ALSO:https://newsng.ng/why-governor-zulum-directs-immediate-investigation-into-murics-claims-of-hijab-harassment-in-maiduguri-hospitals/

Another critical factor in this critique revolves around the role of media in shaping perceptions of security and community relations. The media portrayal of MURIC’s allegations may amplify feelings of alienation and enmity within an already vulnerable population. A nuanced reporting strategy is essential to avoid sensationalism that either downplays serious security concerns or escalates tensions unnecessarily.

On a deep look at the situation, it is essential to propose recommendations for improving the current situation. First and foremost, any security checks implemented within healthcare facilities must prioritize sensitivity training for security personnel. By emphasizing respect and understanding of cultural practices, personnel can uphold public safety without compromising dignity. Additionally, establishing feedback mechanisms can allow individuals to report grievances related to their experiences during security checks, paving the way for continuous improvement.

Secondly, the collaboration between government bodies, law enforcement, and community organizations should be fortified to address collective security challenges. Joint initiatives such as community workshops focused on building understanding around security measures can aid in forging stronger community bonds.

While the allegations made by MURIC about the harassment of Muslim women during security checks must not be dismissed, they serve as a reminder of the delicate interplay between security and civil liberties. During a time of heightened risks from terrorism in Maiduguri, it is crucial to maintain vigilance and prioritize safety without compromising the rights and dignity of individuals. The focus should be on collaborative efforts that enhance security while fostering inclusivity and understanding. Only through meaningful dialogue can communities navigate the complexities of safeguarding lives and upholding the tenets of justice, equity, and respect.

* James Bwala, PhD, a security strategy analyst, writes from Abuja.

Harassment of Muslim Women in Maiduguri Hospitals: An Assertion Amidst an Alarming Increase in Terrorist Activities in Nigeria’s Northeastern Region. 

Zulum Orders Immediate Investigation into MURIC’s Claims of Hijab Harassment in Maiduguri Hospitals

By: Michael Mike

Borno State Governor, Prof. Babagana Zulum said he received with great concern a statement by the Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) alleging the harassment of muslim women for wearing hijab in some hospitals in Maiduguri.

Zulum noted that while the government is not aware of any official report or complaint regarding such incidents, his administration has taken the allegations with utmost seriousness.

In a directive issued on Thursday through his spokesperson, Dauda Iliya, Zulum, ordered the Commissioner of Health and Human Services, Professor Baba Mallam Gana, to undertake an immediate and thorough investigation to ascertain the veracity of these claims.

The statement noted that Zulum reiterated his administration’s commitment to protecting all citizens’ religious rights and dignity, particularly that of women. He stated that Borno State, being a predominantly muslim society, holds hijab in high esteem and any form of harassment against those who choose to wear it, is unacceptable and will not be tolerated.

“The welfare and rights of our citizens, especially our mothers, wives, and daughters, are paramount. We have zero-tolerance for any form of discrimination or harassment. While we have no prior record of such complaints, we are not taking these allegations lightly. This investigation will be swift and transparent. If any wrongdoing is found, appropriate disciplinary action will be taken immediately,” Zulum assured.

The statement added that Zulum urges the public, and specifically individuals who have experienced such treatment, to come forward and assist in the investigation with credible information to ensure a fair and just outcome.

“I assure the public that, that Borno State government under my leadership will not tolerate any action that unjustly targets or humiliate any segment of our society,” he concludes.

Zulum Orders Immediate Investigation into MURIC’s Claims of Hijab Harassment in Maiduguri Hospitals

Adamawa Court fixes Nov. 3 for Furore Emirate case defense

Adamawa State High Court IV sitting in Yola on Wednesday adjourned a case challenging the Adamawa government for the creation of the Fufore emirate council from Adamawa emirate to November 3rd and 4th for defense.

Justice Musa Usman who presided over the case said, this at the end of two days hearing from the principal witness, plaintiffs.

The case which was filed by the three traditional titles holders of Adamawa emirate; Alhaji Musa Halilu, Dujuma Adamawa, Mustapha Dahiru, Yarima Adamawa and Alhaji Mustapha Ahmadu, Sarki Noma Adamawa that due process was not followed before the creation of Fufore emirate.
‎

Manga Nurudeen (SAN), counsel to the plaintiffs, told newsmen at the end of the seating that they had called four witnesses in the case and concluded.

“As you may have seen, the court has adjourned to 3rd and 4th of November for the defense, for the government and the new airmen to bring their own witnesses to be cross examined.

The defense counsel, state Attorney General and Commissioner of Justice, Afraimu Jingi, also said they have successfully taken the evidence of the plaintiffs during the two days of seating.

“They listed five witnesses they were able to call four and they closed their case.

“And fortunately we have been able to answer the questions to our mind that we thought we can discredit them to our mind which is left to the court to determine”, he said.

According to him, they were satisfied with the proceedings and they do not have any burden on them as the next agenda will be defense.

Adamawa Court fixes Nov. 3 for Furore Emirate case defense