Connect with us

News

ECOWAS Court Gives Judgment on Press Council Inconsistency with Human Rights Law

Published

on

ECOWAS Court Gives Judgment on Press Council Inconsistency with Human Rights Law

By: Michael Mike

The ECOWAS Court of Justice has delivered its judgment in a case brought by two Nigerian journalists alleging the Nigerian Press Council Act of 1992 was discriminatory and violated their right to freedom of expression.

In its judgment delivered by Hon Justice Dupe Atoki, Judge Rapporteur, the Court declared that Sections 19 (1)(a), 27 and 37 of the Nigerian Press Council (NPC) Act failed to recognize public interest media including rights of online and citizen journalists thereby violating Article 9 (1) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR), and Article 8 (1) and 10 (2) of the Declaration of Principles on Freedom of Expression in Africa.

The Court therefore ordered the government of Nigeria to amend these contested Sections to align with international practices that promote free, pluralistic and professional journalism. It however dismissed other claims which were not substantiated.

The case with suit number ECW/CCJ/APP/31/21 was filed on 14 June 2021 by lawyers representing the Applicants – Mr Isaac Olamikan and Mrs Edoghogho Ugberease – online and citizen journalists who practise journalism for the promotion of freedom of expression, opinion, and access to information.

In the application, they claimed that Sections 19(1)a, 27 and 37 of the Nigeria Press Council Act of 1992 requiring journalists to be at least 18 years and accredited by the NPC, 25 years to be an editor with working experience in reputable media organization or news agency and registered with the Nigeria Union of Journalists, discriminated against them.

The Applicants’ lawyers led by Mr President Aigbokhan argued that these Sections failed to recognise public interest media such as the rights of online and citizen journalists and were therefore discriminatory and violated their right to freedom of expression as guaranteed under Articles 2 and 9(1) of the ACHPR, Article 19 of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights (UDHR), Articles 2, 10 and 19 of the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and Article 8 (1) and 10 (2) of the Declaration of Principles on Freedom of Expression in Africa; and breached the State’s obligation under the ECOWAS Treaty among other cited texts.

“For example, Section 37 of the Press Council Act, puts the minimum age to practice journalism as 18 years of age, while to be qualified as an editor, requires a minimum of 25 years of age. Sections 19(a) and 27 of the Act imposes educational qualifications and compulsory courses of attendance and training before a person can be recognized and allowed to practice as a journalist,” the judgment stated.

They also submitted that they were arrested separately at different locations while investigating and gathering information for their work, and that their arrest and detention were unlawful and violated their rights.

The Applicants asked the Court to order the Respondent to amend the contested Sections of the NPC Act to align with international practice and pay 1,000,000 (one million) USD as damages.

On their part, the Respondent’s lawyers Mrs Maimuna Lami Shiru and Mrs B.J. Oladipo told the Court that ‘journalism is a sensitive profession requiring mastery as well as regulation to prevent negative effect, adding that rights to information and freedom of expression are not absolute.’

The Respondent denied arresting and detaining the Applicants unlawfully, stating that the first Applicant was arrested because his action had national security implications while the second Applicant operated illegally.

They added that, in the same way as other professional bodies, there were criteria for registration and membership as journalists, and urged the Court to dismiss the case describing it as frivolous, baseless and an abuse of court process.
In its analysis, the Court determined if the matter was within its mandate, if it was admissible and if the Sections of the NPC Act were discriminatory and violated the right to freedom of expression of the Applicants. Relying on its rules of procedure and jurisprudence, the Court held the matter was within its jurisdiction and the case was admissible.

On the alleged violation of Article 2 of ACHPR the Court noted that the Applicants did not substantiate on how they were treated differently in an identical or similar situation. Consequently, it held that their rights to freedom from discrimination under Article 2 of ACHPR has not been violated.

While on the alleged violation of Article 9 (freedom of expression), the Court noted that Section 19(1) and Section 27 of the Press Act imposing minimum educational requirement, age limit and registration, were restrictive and interfered with the right to freedom of expression, and therefore violated Article 9 (2).

In reaching its decision, the Court also noted the impact of technology in the evolving media space with the advent of citizen journalists, influencers and content creators who share news, commentary, and analysis on social issues. Though not qualified in traditional sense, they contributed to shaping public opinion.

It drew inspiration from young activists notably Malala Yousafzai and Greta Thunberg who in their teens integrated online media in their advocacy and have attained world recognition through a free and unrestricted opportunity to gather information and express opinion.

Regarding the Applicants’ claim of unlawful arrest and detention, the Court noted that the Applicants did not prove their arrest was unlawful. Consequently, the Court dismissed their claims of unlawful arrest and request for compensation.

Both parties were ordered to bear their costs of litigation.

Also on the bench were Hon Justices Edward Amoako Asante (presiding) and Sengu M. Koroma (Member).

ECOWAS Court Gives Judgment on Press Council Inconsistency with Human Rights Law

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

U.S. congress calls for bilateral pact, tougher measures over Christian persecution in Nigeria

Published

on

U.S. congress calls for bilateral pact, tougher measures over Christian persecution in Nigeria

By: Zagazola Makama

The United States House of Representatives has called for a new bilateral agreement with Nigeria aimed at protecting vulnerable Christian communities, strengthening counter-terrorism cooperation and addressing sectarian violence across the country.

The call followed deliberations by the House Appropriations Committee and the House Foreign Affairs Committee on what lawmakers described as “the persecution of Christians in Nigeria.”

In a joint position, U.S. lawmakers commended President Donald Trump for redesignating Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern (CPC) over religious freedom violations, saying the move would help hold perpetrators accountable and compel stronger protective measures by Nigerian authorities.

According to the committees, the U.S. President urged members of Congress, including Congressman Riley Moore and House Appropriations Chairman Tom Cole, to investigate and produce a report on violence against Nigerian Christians.

Appropriations Vice Chair Mario Díaz-Balart reportedly hosted an investigative roundtable and led a congressional delegation to Nigeria, while House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Brian Mast and Africa Subcommittee Chairman Chris Smith convened hearings to gather evidence from government and civil society witnesses.

The committees concluded that Nigeria has witnessed prolonged sectarian violence, particularly in parts of the North Central and northern states, where Christian communities have been affected by attacks from armed groups, including insurgent and militia factions.

They alleged that thousands of Christians had been killed over the past two decades, with churches, schools and farmlands destroyed, and many residents displaced. The report also raised concerns over the application of blasphemy laws in some northern states, alleging that such provisions have been used to silence dissent and target religious minorities.

While acknowledging Nigeria as a key U.S. partner in Africa, the lawmakers stressed that the Nigerian government must demonstrate stronger political will by committing financial and security resources to reduce and eliminate violence.

Recommendations

The committees proposed a bilateral U.S.–Nigeria agreement focused on: Protection of vulnerable Christian communities. Elimination of jihadist and militia violence. Expansion of economic cooperation. Countering external adversarial influence, including from China and Russia.

They recommended that Nigeria co-fund humanitarian assistance programmes, especially in the North Central, and strengthen early-warning and rapid-response security mechanisms.

The lawmakers also called for the removal of armed militias from confiscated farmlands to enable displaced communities to return home, alongside expanded security cooperation with the United States, including possible divestment from Russian military equipment in favour of U.S. platforms. Additional proposals included technical support for disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration initiatives, support for livestock reforms and ranching programmes, and enhanced recruitment and capability development within Nigeria’s security forces.

The report further urged comprehensive counter-terrorism cooperation against foreign terrorist organisations operating in the region.

Other measures outlined include sanctions against individuals or groups found to participate in or tolerate religious violence, continued visa restrictions on perpetrators, and consideration of reviewing the classification of certain armed militia groups as Foreign Terrorist Organizations under U.S. law.

The committees also recommended stronger financial oversight, anti-money laundering measures, and disruption of terror financing networks, as well as increased oversight of U.S. assistance to Nigeria through a Government Accountability Office (GAO) audit.

Zagazola report that the proposals, if adopted, could deepen U.S.–Nigeria security cooperation but may also introduce diplomatic sensitivities, particularly regarding internal security classifications, religious legislation and trade measures.

Nigerian authorities have consistently maintained that security challenges in the country are complex, involving criminality, insurgency, communal conflicts and banditry rather than a singular religious war.

Zagazola note that sectarian and communal violence in Nigeria often involves cycles of attack and reprisal between agrarian and pastoral communities, insurgent activities in the North-East, and criminal banditry in the North-West.

As of press time, there was no official response from the Nigerian Government regarding the latest congressional recommendations.

The development, however, signals heightened U.S. legislative scrutiny of Nigeria’s security situation and could shape future bilateral engagements on security and regional stability.

U.S. congress calls for bilateral pact, tougher measures over Christian persecution in Nigeria

Continue Reading

News

Berom youths issue ultimatum over grazing after seven die in Barkin Ladi attack in Plateau

Published

on

Berom youths issue ultimatum over grazing after seven die in Barkin Ladi attack in Plateau

By: Zagazola Makama

Berom youths in Barkin Ladi Local Government Area of Plateau have issued a strong warning to government and security agencies in the state, declaring that they “cannot guarantee peace and safety on the Plateau if Fulani continue grazing on our land.”

The warning followed the killing of seven persons in Dorowa Babuje village on Feb. 22 after gunmen suspected to be Fulani bandits opened fire on residents at a local relaxation spot.

Security sources said troops of Sector 4 under Operation Safe Haven responded to a distress call at about 7:30 p.m., discovering seven persons dead and two others critically injured.

The corpses were evacuated to Barkin Ladi General Hospital mortuary, while the injured were rushed to the same facility for treatment. Troops subsequently launched aggressive patrols across Dorowa Babuje, Dong and Lugere communities to prevent further escalation and track the attackers.

However, hours after news of the killings spread, another violent episode unfolded along the Nding axis of Barkin Ladi LGA.

Security sources confirmed that youths suspected to be local indigenes mounted a road blockade and intercepted a passenger Opel Vectra conveying civilians. Four persons were reportedly selected and killed on the spot, while a fifth later died from injuries. Two of the victims were identified as Hausa indigenes of Jos North, heightening tension in parts of Jos metropolis, including Terminus and Gangare areas.

The retaliatory attack prompted swift deployments of troops in flashpoints across Barkin Ladi and adjoining districts. Joint patrols and stop-and-search operations have also been intensified along major roads. But despite the efforts by security agencies, youths barricaded road for many hourz in protest and addressed government officials who visited the area.

In a series of emotionally charged remarks, a representative of the Berom youths alleged systematic attacks by Fulani militias and accused them of manipulating narratives to justify violence.

“This is another round of terrorism and we want the security to have it on record that our lives are not to be killed by the so-called Fulani,” the youth leader said.

“These are terrorists and it must be admitted that Fulani that are killing us are terrorists.” He further alleged that herders frame incidents to justify reprisals. We are aware that they have been framing up reports that cows have been attacked, poisoned or their people have been attacked, thereby justifying these killings,” he said.

The youth leader issued a direct warning to authorities. “If Fulani are not designated as terrorists, if Fulani are not stopped from grazing on our land, nobody should come and arrest anybody,” he said.

He added: “Sir, stop this Fulani from grazing on our land. Our land is not for any grazing. Declaring that the community felt pushed to the wall, he stated: “We have been pushed to the wall… we will not take it.”

He also said: “We stand to defend our land. We stand to defend our lives and our heritage is not to be shared with the Fulani.” The youth leader further cautioned: “We cannot guarantee PEACE and SAFETY on the PLATEAU if Fulani continue grazing on our land.”If they poisoned their livestock, does that justify this act?” If they poisoned their cows, who did the poisoning? Is it our people or the Fulani?”

“We are aware that they have been framing up reports that cows have been attacked, their people have been attacked, thereby justifying these killings. Sir, you are the eye of the government here. I swear to God, we will not take it.”

“If Fulani are not designated as terrorists, if Fulani are not stopped from grazing on our land, nobody should come and arrest anybody. The terrorists are there, they are killing people. They come with their cows, graze our lands and allege that we are the ones killing their people by laying ambush to shift the blame on us and come with this terror attack on us.”

“We are not fighting with anybody; we are law-abiding citizens. We are not fighting with any Hausa or anybody, but we stand to defend our land.” We stand to defend our lives and our heritage is not to be shared with the Fulani. They own their cows, we own our land. If Fulani want to acquire land, they should follow the lawful means, not to come and hijack land by force and then use it as a base to launch attacks.”

“We have information that bandits have been brought in and are being led by YELLOW, and nobody is doing anything. There must be something done about these people that have been killed.”

As at yesterday, we got on credible authority that Fulani are saying that we have been killing their people and they brought out some list. Who killed them and at what point?” These people were killed in their homes. Let us know where Fulani have ever been killed in his homes.”

“We are aware that anytime Fulani already plan an attack on our people, they will scheme it. They will go and poison their cows and start killing their own and then shift the blame on us.”
They will go and kill people that are not in support of what they are doing and then shift the blame on us.” he said.

He also called for action against Miyetti Allah, alleging that the group was encouraging violence and spreading unverified claims. “I want to believe they are the ones encouraging these things.” You went on air and alleged that it was Berom militia, we don’t have Berom militia and no Fulani settlement has been attacked.”

“So it is us that are meant to be killed simply because they have the propaganda machine and some backing of political office holders.”
If you don’t invest in us, if you don’t invest in our wellbeing, don’t come for us for anything.” We cannot continue to be killed like this.”he declared.

Meanwhile, security sources indicated that the Dorowa Babuje killings were being investigated as a possible reprisal linked to weeks of targeted assaults on pastoralist communities in parts of Barkin Ladi and neighbouring Riyom Local Government Areas.

On Feb. 19, three Fulani youths, Tahiru Muhammad, Jibrin Salisu and Abdulmumin Isyak were reportedly ambushed and killed near Jong community while returning from Dorowa Babuje axis, by suspected Berom militia. One of the assailants reportedly beheaded a victim, while the others were shot dead. Empty 7.62mm Special cartridges and a motorcycle were recovered at the scene.

Less than 24 hours before the Barkin Ladi attack, armed men suspected to be Berom militia reportedly attacked herders in Jol community of Riyom, killing one Muhammed Sani while another victim, identified as Faruq Jamilu, was abducted. An unspecified number of cattle were also reportedly killed or injured during the assault.

On Feb. 11 at about 8:30 a.m., six cows belonging to Alhaji Bello Haruna and Iliya Yusuf, both of Rwam Village in Mushere District, Bokkos LGA, were reportedly poisoned at Tulus and Rwam villages. Two of the cows died instantly, while four others were slaughtered after showing signs consistent with poisoning.

In the same development, Militia suspected to be from the Birom ethnic group attacked a Fulani settlement in Tulus Village, Horop, setting ablaze two houses belonging to Kadiri Adamu and Hashimu Adamu. The Bokkos incident followed an earlier case in Riyom LGA. The Fulani community in Riyom reported that a cow belonging to Anas Likita, a resident of Luggere in Jol Ward, was attacked and seriously injured by individuals suspected to be youths from Jol community.

Abdullahi Yusuf, the Leader of the Fulani community in Riyom, while calling for calm, condemned the act. “Such incidents only increase tension and undermine ongoing efforts toward peace and stability in Riyom LGA,” the community said in a statement signed by Abdullahi Yusuf on Feb. 9.

On Feb. 2, one cow was shot dead at Weren Camp, Riyom LGA, while three others were poisoned in Kwi Village. Reports said toxic substances were concealed inside oranges and deliberately placed along grazing fields. The attack occurred in the afternoon.

Data from recent incidents indicate that both agrarian and pastoral communities have suffered casualties within weeks. While Dorowa Babuje recorded seven deaths attributed to suspected Fulani militias, preceding attacks had claimed Fulani lives in Riyom and Barkin Ladi, including killings within or near their settlements.

This pattern of attack to retaliation draw attention to a “cycle of mutual victimhood,” where each side cites prior losses to justify fresh violence against the other.

As tension lingers in Barkin Ladi and parts of Jos, stakeholders warn that inflammatory ultimatums and retaliatory actions risk widening the conflict beyond local flashpoints.

For now, security forces remain on high alert, racing to contain violence that once again threatens to engulf Plateau in another cycle of bloodshed.

Berom youths issue ultimatum over grazing after seven die in Barkin Ladi attack in Plateau

Continue Reading

News

New civil service association wants Ogun governor to halt hurried implementation of contributory pension scheme until…

Published

on

New civil service association wants Ogun governor to halt hurried implementation of contributory pension scheme until…

By: Bodunrin Kayode

The entire members of the Association of New Ogun Civil and Public Service Retirees have called on Governor Dapo Abiodun to halt any further accelerated action on the proposed contributory pension scheme (CPS) for civil servants.

The association which comprises more than 600 members and still counting as people are retiring wants Prince Dapo Abiodun, to consider their plights by shifting the proposed hurried implementation of the CPS forward to a later year when all vexatious aspects of the law that established the CPS would have been properly fixed.

In a release signed by about five of the worried retirees, led by Shadrach Omopariola, the members maintain we that “inline with this, we plead with His Excellency Prince Dapo Abiodun CON to order the payment of our monthly pension as from January 1st 2026 to bring back the hope of living in us and put smile on our faces.

“Your Excellency Sir, we heard that your Government is planning to introduce a new idea that is known as ‘Additional Pension Benefits’ This in itself is nothing to be compared with the gains and benefits of the Old Pension Scheme.

” Sir, the payment of our monthly pension would in no small measure improve not only the economic growth of our immediate families but would be a moral booster for the good people of Ogun State inline with Your Excellency’s Mantra of ‘Igbega ipinle Ogun Ajose Gbogbo wa Ni’.

“We will patiently wait for the payment of our gratuity with faith in the government of Ogun State to pay us as soon as possible.

“We remain law-abiding senior citizens of Ogun State even in this difficult situation where we have no money to take care of ourselves, our children, our aged parents, and other dependent relatives.

“We believe in your kind heartedness and goodwill that you will not close your eyes to our pleading but you will come to our rescue within the shortest time possible to bring happiness and joy to all of us.”

The release was jointly signed by Omopariola Shadrach, Adeyanju Joseph, Falola Kayode, Obasan Olufolake and Kayode Mulikat.

The contributory pension scheme is a new scheme first introduced by the fed government in June 2004 following the enactment of the pension reform act by President Olusegun Obasanjo.

The act was later repealed and replaced by the pension reform Act of 2014 which updated the terms of the scheme by exempting employees who had three years or less to retire, those who retired before the enactment, judicial officers, members of the armed forces and the secret service.

Teachers who should have led the list of these exemptions because of their thankless services to humanity like that of the military were completely ignored.

Sub nationals now trying to domesticate the scheme have equally refused to give teachers that special exemption they are entitled to for their thankless services.

New civil service association wants Ogun governor to halt hurried implementation of contributory pension scheme until…

Continue Reading

Trending

Verified by MonsterInsights