Global Governance Initiative: China’s Bold Step Against Hegemony, Injustice

By: Dr. Bridget Chiedu Onochie

At a time when the world is grappling with complex challenges – social unrest, economic hegemony and unhealthy politics, a robust global governance system appears the only panacea. The prevailing unwholesome scenarios playing around the world not completely occasioned by natural tendencies but majorly orchestrated by leadership idiosyncrasies at the global level, no doubt, threatens human peace, and if left untamed, may further destabilize sequence of events by creating disharmony among peoples of the world.

By global governance, we refer to the systems, rules and standards that guide international relations and cooperation among countries, international organizations and other stakeholders in global development and peace. It envisages collaboration among nations towards addressing world’s challenges with international institutions such as the United Nations, World Bank and International Monetary Fund formulating inclusive, equitable and people-oriented policies.

The primary goals of global governance, include promotion of peace and security in such a manner that conflicts are prevented; fostering economic development, protection of human rights by upholding dignity and well-being of people as well as decisively combating global natural challenges such as the climate change, pandemics and any other issue of urgent global interest.

Unfortunately, the inability of the international institutions to balance national interests with global needs, guarantee fair representation and participation, and effectively address complex global challenges through cooperation, diplomacy and other relevant tools, has witnessed escalation of natural occurrences and hostilities across the globe.

The Chinese President, Xi Jinping and his country therefore deserve commendation and accolade for amplifying the call for efficient and enduring global governance.

By proposing the GGI, Xi bold stepped forward to expose existing discrepancy in global governance, especially the forcelessness of the Global South in the essential mechanisms for global governance irrespective of their contributions to world’s economy and overall development.

The gap in international relations and its governance process have over the years, denied the essential contributions and cumulative insight of the majority of the world stakeholders.

The initiative, which was proposed by President Xi on September 1, 2025, during the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO Plus) meeting held at the Tianjin Meijiang Convention and Exhibition Center, among other necessities, targets necessary reforms at the global institutions’ level.

That GGI was tied to the commemoration of the 80th anniversary of the victory of the World Anti-Fascist War and the founding of the United Nations, having been established on October 24, 1945, speaks volume of Chinese attention to history and how its hands in shaping the future.

Unfortunately, 80 years down the lane, the global institutions entrusted with the responsibilities of safeguarding member countries, especially the less powerful nations from socio-economic hegemony, appeared overwhelmed while blatant disregard for territorial sovereignty permeates the world.
One of the greatest benefits of the proposed

GGI as canvassed by several well-meaning citizens of the world therefore is the expected drastic reforms of the institutions to enshrine inclusivity and mutual respect.

As aptly proposed by China, there should be a commitment to peaceful coexistence and strengthening of confidence in a manner that guarantees a win-win situation. Beyond the proposal, China has also volunteered to work with all countries to ensure that a more just and equitable global governance system is enshrined. This perhaps, may be one of the fastest lane to its long time clamour for a community with a shared future for humanity.

The Global Governance as an initiative stands on five solid pillars of sovereign equality, international rule of law, practical multilateralism, people-centered approach and taking real actions.

Through these pillars, China canvasses a global governance structure that promotes to sovereign equality by ensuring that all countries, irrespective of size, strength and wealth, are equal participants in decision-making, beneficiaries in global governance. It also seeks greater effort towards entrenching a democratic culture in international relations to the extent of amplifying the voice of developing countries by increasing their representations in international institutions.

The second pillar, which dwells on the need to abide by international rule of law, clearly defines the purposes and principles of the U.N. Charter and other universally recognized basic norms of international relations. It holds that international law and rules should be applied equally and uniformly without double standards or few countries imposed upon others.

The GGI expressed the need to uphold the vision of global governance that features extensive consultation and joint contributions for shared benefit, that which strengthens solidarity and coordination, opposed to unilateralism, and that, which firmly safeguards the status and authority of the U.N to enable it play the expected key role in global governance.

Another reason for seeking a reform of the global governance system is to make governance more people-oriented, the one that recognizes people of every nation as equal players and by so doing, gradually bridges the gulf between the Global North and the South.

There is also need to transcend rhetoric in addressing world challenges. The new GGI supports a systematic and holistic coordination of global actions and the ability to fully mobilize resources, struggle for more visible outcomes and enhance practical cooperation to prevent the governance system from disintegration.

Since no individual or country gives what it doesn’t have, it is not surprising therefore that the in past 24 years, the SCO has adhered faithfully to the Shanghai Spirit of mutual trust, mutual benefit, equality, consultation, respect for diversity of civilizations and pursuit of common development, thereby setting the pace for practical and exemplary global governance.

The fact that China’s regional affairs are inclusively discussed and provides platforms and mechanisms for actions built together and cooperation that benefits buttressed the possibility of a new global governance if players are determined and resolute.

The SCO has drawn inspiration from the lessons of the past and their contemporary implications. According to experts, foundation of the initiative was laid by issues emanating from rigorous interrogations of the prevailing existential reality and international conditions, a circumstance that promotes survival of the fittest and emphases for living before essence.

The GGI is therefore a clarion call for objective representation of every country, for collective consensus of the global family that defies factional coalitions and bloc loyalty, having been conspicuously made evident that no matter how powerful some countries may be, they may not possess adequate mechanism to deal with emerging challenges of international system exclusively.

As the wave of development blows across the globe, even the once relegated, developing, nations are experiencing subtle but accelerated progress in science and technology. That is the reality of the Global South, especially China, which has astronomically leapt into the mainstream of the contemporary global power.

Yet, the beauty of China’s development is the positive impacts that country has made on other continents and respective countries of the world, including Africa. By so doing, it has assumed, without self-gratification, international responsibilities as the emerging big brother of the Global South, not only with the deployment of its resources to translate visions to visible, actionable development but equally, building a reputation for seeking inclusive world that is peaceful, equitable and conducive for all.

Therefore, the five GIG concepts, which are already set in motion in China, should be considered imperative for the new global order. The fact that SCO has increasingly become a catalyst for the development and reform of the global governance system is something that should excite the world rather than build walls of sentiments.

President Xi in his powerful address reiterated that China was ready to work with all parties in order to uphold courageously, the great principle and the common good of the world, to promote a correct historical perspective on World War II, to resolutely safeguard the fruits of their victory in the War, to deliver more benefits to the entire humanity through the reform of the global governance system and to build of a community with a shared future for humanity.

For Nigerians across different sectors, a new Global Governance Initiative (CGI) is the long awaited game-changer. Although it is the fourth development idea proposed by China under the leadership of Xi, it is highly expected that other ideas will seamlessly fall in line if global governance is gotten right.

The Federal government of Nigeria has also described the initiative as a well thought out contribution towards strengthening the international system. As one of the Africa’s largest economies and an active participant in multilateral diplomacy, Nigeria sees GGI as a valuable platform for advancing shared priorities, including reform of the UN, inclusive governance in emerging domains and promotion of equitable development.

By this, it has joined the rest of the peace-loving countries of the world to reaffirm sustained commitment to a just, inclusive and effective international order, which reflects the aspirations of all peoples, and upholds the principles of shared responsibility and mutual respect.

For China, the Global South appreciates your contributions and constant reminder in words and actions, that no nation should be left behind. The newly proposed GGI is just one of those valuable contributions.

Global Governance Initiative: China’s Bold Step Against Hegemony, Injustice

China’s Eight-Point Rules And Impacts On Party Politics, Government Conduct

By Dr. Bridget Chiedu Onochie

Many people across the world have remained in awe on how China was able to have emerged from the economic doldrums to become a global economic power. However, the simple explanation is that beyond the country’s determination for enhanced living standard as well as the patriotic zeal displayed by the government under the Communist Party of China (CPC), there were certain enforceable norms and policies set down by the government upon which the country thrives.

One of such policies was the Eight-Point Decision on Improving Party and Government Conduct and Building Closer Ties with the People, which was issued at a meeting of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee held on December 4, 2012, chaired by the General Secretary of CPC Central Committee, Chinese President and Chairman, Central Military Commission, Comrade Xi Jinping.

It is pertinent to state that of all the policies that have contributed in launching China among the comity of progressives – technological and industrial giants, the eight-point decision resonates visibly due to its leadership by example peculiarity.

The policy decisions include, doing better research and analysis and truly understanding actual conditions when doing grassroots-level studies; streamlining meetings and improving the way meetings are conducted; making documents and briefing papers more concise and improving writing styles; standardizing procedures for working visits abroad and improving security guard work and continuing to observe the principle of doing what improves relations with the people.

Others are, improving news report; having strict rules on the publication of articles and promoting frugality and the strict observance of rules on incorruptibility in government.
Critically analyzing the eight-point decision buttressed their relevance to daily life and living. There is rarely anything pertaining to good governance that was not touched by the decisions.

For the leadership of the CPC, Party’s conduct is not only crucial to winning the people’s support but also a matter of concern to the Party’s survival or demise. This exactly was the standpoint of the party in a speech delivered at the first meeting of the 18th CPC Central Committee Political Bureau on December 4, 2012, where the
decisions were birthed.

The decision articulated a leadership system and working mechanism for combating corruption. For effectiveness, it established a Party discipline inspection commissions, supervision departments, judiciary and auditing agencies, and have worked with them conscientiously to improve the party conduct, uphold integrity and tackle corruption. It also ensured that in the course of their duties, Party committees at all levels should bear total leadership responsibility for improving Party conduct and building a clean government.

One important lesson of the Eight-Point Decision is the resolve or undertaking by party leadership to improve existing institutions to better fight against corruption;
redouble efforts in political and theoretical education, reinforce stricter Party discipline and respond to the demands of the people.

This would have been drawn from the country’s deep-rooted understanding that corruption is not a victimless crime but that which its costs go far beyond the money and property stolen. Corruption greatly undermines human dignity by depriving citizens of access to basic rights and services, including healthcare, education, justice, and economic opportunities.

Consequently, he eight golden rules placed on the ruling Party, the responsibility of completing the building of a moderately prosperous society in all respects. The party leadership resolved to be a good blacksmith in forging good tools and since then, members were dedicated to addressing the problems of being “lax, slack and lenient.”

The Four Malfeasances are difficult to eradicate.
Under the Eight-Point decision, the party remained committed to rectifying problems and improving leaders’ conduct including elimination of favourtism and bureaucratic bottleneck, which are two major monsters that tend to frustrate merit and slow down administrative and institutional workflow.

Chinese government considered these two entirely incompatible with the nature, mission and fine conduct of their Party, describing them as the arch enemies of the Party and the people.

They fully understand that combating corruption is the most important political
issue that concerns citizen’s trust and support a fight that must be won, not against the citizens but by leadership first, if sustainable development must be achieved.

Impacts of Eight-Point Rules on Chinese Economy and Lessons for Africa
Since the introduction of the Eight-Point Decision on Improving Party and Government Conduct and Building Closer Ties with the People in 2012, the party leadership was said to have become more robust and effective.

Expectantly, such resolve will dovetail in building a formidable economy and enhancing the living standard of the people.
The decisions prompted a fundamental change in the manner public funds and resources are allocated and utilized, and by curbing extravagance and rent-seeking behaviors, the relationship between government officials and businessmen is sanitized and fosters a more level playing field, which in turn, became a powerful driver for promoting high-quality economic development.

Obviously, the Eight-Point Decision was not just another policy but a commitment to clean governance and a direct response to public concerns about officialdom.

Interestingly, President Xi endeared himself to the world through his actions. In this circumstance, he spearheaded the initiative by playing strictly according to rules, and embodying the spirit of leading by example – setting standards from the top down.

The strict implementation of the eight-point decision provided impetus for a solid foundation for the historic achievements and transformative changes witnessed in China through the efforts of the ruling CPC. It significantly promoted progress in the country’s political, socio-economic and cultural landscapes; strengthening efforts towards building a strong nation and the rejuvenation that is famously known as the Chinese modernization.

Politically, the eight-point decision was instrumental to a major overhaul in the governance of the Party. It has also propelled a revolutionary self-purification within
the Party ranks, safeguarding and enhancing the Party’s advanced nature by sanitizing and bolstering its unity, combating readiness and making Party’s leadership more robust and effective.

On the social front, the decision echoed loudly with the aspirations of both Party members and the general public, having facilitated the resolution of numerous challenges of public concern.

Culturally, the decision equally played a crucial role in thoroughly rooting out the remnants of feudalistic practices and resisted the influence of Western cultures. The revitalized work style within the Party and the government served as a powerful example, leading to insightful positive changes in social customs and public morality and unleashing strong spiritual strength for the advancement of Chinese modernization.

Thus, it was the tangible improvements in official conduct that have earned the sincere support of the people, thereby strengthening the social foundation for the Party’s long-term governance.

For Africa, the great lesson lies in the ability of the ruling party to endeared themselves to the populace through evidence-based performance rather that propaganda. There is no doubt that the amplifying voice of the opposition is often triggered in Africa’s political landscape by poor performance of the party in power. As it is often said, actions sound louder than words.

China’s Eight-Point Rules And Impacts On Party Politics, Government Conduct

Troops humiliate ISWAP in Malam Fatori, neutralized several fighters as it repel dawn attack

By: Zagazola Makama

In the predawn calm of Mallamfatori, a strategic town on the fringes of Lake Chad, troops of the Multinational Joint Task Force (MNJTF) and the Nigerian Army stood their ground against one of the most daring attacks launched recently by ISWAP fighters.

Zagazola report that at about 4:30 a.m. on Tuesday, terrorists targeted Forward Operating Base (FOB) Kangar with a coordinated assault involving armed drones, mortar shelling and rapid ground movement. The assault was clearly intended to overwhelm the base and inflict mass casualties.

According to sources, the troops supported by the Civilian Joint Task Force (CJTF) absorbed the initial barrage, reorganised and pushed back fiercely. A reinforcement team from the main battalion swiftly joined the fight, mounting a counteroffensive.

What followed was a brief, intense firefight that shattered the attackers’ momentum. The attack was decisively repelled. Troops’ morale and combat efficiency remain high,” a senior field commander said.

The decisive turnaround came when Nigerien ground attack platforms joined the fight from the MNJTF axis, striking the terrorists’ firing positions. The joint force counter-assault forced the attackers to abandon their assault plan and flee toward the waterways of the Tumbuns.

Troops immediately conducted exploitation of the battlefield, confirming six terrorists neutralised and recovering a significant cache of weapons.

Recovered items include:5 x AK-47 rifles, 8 x AK-47 magazines, 258 rounds of 7.62mm ammunition, 5 x RPG bombs, 4 x armed drone bombs and 5 x 36 hand grenades.

Several other bodies of terrorists were seen being evacuated by their fleeing comrades, indicating a higher casualty figure on the enemy side.

As the terrorists attempted to retreat deeper into the Tumbuns, the Nigerien Air Force conducted additional air strikes, targeting clustered movements detected by surveillance feeds. The strikes reportedly neutralised “additional scores” of the fleeing fighters.

Despite the use of armed drones a worrying trend and a sign of evolving terrorist tactics troops of FOB Kangar successfully held the line.

Some soldiers and CJTF members sustained injuries from the initial drone and mortar strikes, but Zagazola gathered that they were promptly evacuated using MNJTF air platforms for medical attention.

Sources added that all the wounded personnel are in stable condition.

n the larger context, Mallamfatori and the Lake Chad islands remain one of the most fiercely contested spaces in the ongoing fight against terrorism. Control of the waterways is critical to cutting off insurgent logistics, arms supply routes and cross-border movement.

However, the response by troops and multinational partners equally demonstrates that the days of unchallenged freedom of movement for terrorists around the border axis are steadily closing. As one soldier told said shortly after the assault:

“We are here to hold this ground. No retreat.”

Zagazola reports that operations are ongoing in the general area, with ISR (Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance) platforms maintaining aerial dominance to track residual threats.
End