News
FOREIGN POLICY AND THE PATH TO PEACE IN A DANGEROUS NEIGHBOURHOOD
FOREIGN POLICY AND THE PATH TO PEACE IN A DANGEROUS NEIGHBOURHOOD
By: Michael
Mike
Nigeria’s foreign policy to promote peace and prosperity is a constitutional obligation as much as it is a considered and sensible manifesto pledge, writes Hon Yusuf Tuggar, Minister of Foreign Affairs.
I was born in a civil war and was not able to vote for my leader until I was in my 30s. Nigeria is now a country guided by the rule of law and a constitution that clearly defines our system of government. This includes our foreign policy objectives, and rightly so, because in an interconnected world, we define our sovereignty in the context of certain, key principles: our right to self-determination; our right to defend our autonomy and secure our borders; and responsibility to respect our obligations under international law.
As foreign minister, I think these provisions are not just reasonable but vital – both for our own democracy, domestic peace and prosperity but also for a more just and stable international order. But the point is this: it is the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, not the manifesto of a political party or predilections of a particular politician, that lays out these provisions. In a democracy, we have the privilege of healthy debate about our values, policies and performance. But if we are to live up to the responsibilities that come with democracy, that debate should be informed, fair and reasonable.
I respect the Constitution and its vision for Nigeria’s place in the international community, as do many of us. It has been an honour and a privilege to protect and promote those constitutional principles. They are the best guarantees for legitimacy, and the authority all governments need if they are to deliver. It is complex and time consuming. To our cost, we have learnt that there are no short cuts. Some Nigerians find fault in our Constitution, while others seek to amend it. There is always room for serious debate in a healthy democracy. But the fact remains it is the very document that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and every public official has sworn to uphold since 1999.
Nigeria’s Constitution declares that sovereignty belongs to the people of Nigeria, from whom government, through this Constitution, derives all its powers and authority. The same Chapter of the Constitution goes on to state Nigeria’s five foreign policy objectives: promotion and protection of the national interest, African integration and support for African unity, promotion of international cooperation for peace and mutual respect, respect of international law and treaty obligations and promotion of a just world economic order. Those who suggest Nigeria does not have a foreign policy or those who agitate for a shift away from an Afro-centric foreign policy are wrong; either they are ill-informed, or deliberately disingenuous.
The irony of it all is that Nigerians are able to speak in support of our military-ruled neighbours, governed without constitutions, precisely because Chapter Four of our own constitution guarantees them these rights and freedoms. This is not the same for the citizens ruled by the very regimes for which they seek to cheerlead of those countries governed without constitutions. Nigerians who are older than 30 know this to be true because we have been there, done that. Somehow in the passage of time, some forget that the military regime here that despatched troops to restore democracy in Sierra Leone and Liberia in the 1990s had first – and by force – taken that same democracy and rule of law away from us – just as military regimes continue to do the world over.
The Constitution also makes clear why any responsible Nigerian government should be concerned when neighbours are governed without a constitution or codified rules. It goes without saying that the sovereignty of our neighbours is their business. They can grant powers to whatever governing structures they deem fit and should expect their autonomy to remain safeguarded. But when our Interdependence Sovereignty overlaps, we equally have a right to exercise control over our borders in those cases where neighbours face insurgencies that significantly comprise territorial integrity and state authority.
International Legal Sovereignty also becomes an issue when we consider that respect for international law and treaty obligations is one of our irreducible foreign policy objectives. This is not the Tinubu administration’s foreign policy; it is a constitutional provision that every Nigerian President and government official swears to uphold. Nigeria is a member of ECOWAS, which is founded on treaties and protocols to which our foreign policy objectives commit us. All 15 member countries are signatory to the treaties and protocols, which is why it was no surprise that President Tinubu, as one who swore to uphold the Constitution, abided by it when ECOWAS leaders collectively objected to Unconstitutional Changes of Government.
In reality, the contemporary nation-state system is highly competitive and Nigeria exists in a self-help world. Our Constitution and international laws are meant to serve as guard rails in navigating the system. And by virtue of our size, we have the additional responsibility of being the regional power. Regardless of how some may try to diminish our standing, it is the way other countries perceive us. Our Constitution further reifies this leadership role right from the preamble- dedicating ourselves to promoting inter-African solidarity, to the foreign policy objectives- promotion of African integration and support for African unity and elimination of discrimination in all its manifestations.
The Tinubu administration comes at a time when an interlocking suite of occurrences have made our neighbourhood less secure; implosion of Libya, failure of the EU Sahel Strategy, terrorism and criminal gangs, effects of climate change and population explosion. Nigeria did not create these challenges and was equally contending with its own domestic issue as these challenges escalated. Nigeria was not part of Operation Barkhane or the G5 in the Sahel, which were intended as efforts to fight terrorism and irregular migration but instead strengthened some irridentist Azawad/Tuareg groups that controlled border areas. This created a cauldron of disharmony between them and their national militaries, trained for a lifetime to keep their countries intact.
Nor was Nigeria part of the Partnership Framework with Third countries that conditioned aid and trade deals for Sahelian migration transit states in exchange for reducing the flow of migrants, with penalties for those who do not comply. In the case of Niger, a moment of truth was the passing of Law 2015-36 in May 2015 when its government, in consultation with the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime and technical and financial support from the European Union and its member states, criminalized ancillary activities of the migration economy, such as providing transportation and accommodation to foreign nationals anywhere north of Agadez, in direct contravention of ECOWAS Protocol on the free movement of people. They were persuaded to use a blunt hammer to crack a delicate nut. There is a highly politicised migration crisis in parts of Europe, that together we can and should resolve. But it was reckless to seek to solve one problem by creating another.
There is a reason why we have free movement in West Africa; seasonal migration- referred to in Hausa as ‘Ci Rani’. Seasonal migration in the semi-arid Sahel can be a matter of life and death, which is why we have always had turbaned Tuaregs going as far as Lagos and Port Harcourt to work as Maigadis (security) during the dry months, only to return back north during the rainy season. The weaponisation of sub-Saharan migration in Europe as a political tool led to the securitisation of the Sahel region, further exacerbating the security situation by forcing many of those affected to turn to criminal activities and terrorism. European migration figures show majority of migrants are from Syria, Afghanistan and Central Asia, not sub-Saharan Africa.
Yes, we need to work with our Sahelian neighbours to fight terrorism, by maintaining a right of pursuit into each others territories. But it would be myopic to think of this in absolutist terms, because we can accede to all conditionalities laid by them, it would still not be enough to tackle the challenges without a lasting solution to the bifurcated Libyan State as a source of weapons, training and fighters, as well as the shadowy involvement of a range of other state and non-state actors.
To achieve a lasting peace in Libya and the Sahel, Nigeria needs to deal with all the countries in the neighbourhood as well as all the major powers. For this reason, it does not make sense to simply deduce that Nigeria has to distance itself from France because that is the prevailing trend in its former colonies. The fulcrum of the Tinubu administration’s foreign policy is Strategic Autonomy, providing us with the clarity to engage with any and all nations based on our national interests and not those of others. As a nation, Nigeria is adult enough and sophisticated enough to deal with countries without being unduly influenced, because that has been part of our historical and civic tradition. You cannot cure an illness by picking which symptoms to consider and which to ignore.
Nigeria and ECOWAS will continue diplomatic efforts towards Niger, Mali and Burkina Faso. At a minimum, we have shared interest in peaceful co-existence. President Tinubu has sent a number of high-level delegations that included a former Head of State, traditional rulers and religious scholars. President Tinubu pushed for the unconditional removal of ECOWAS sanctions imposed on Niger, Mali and Burkina Faso. What he has consistently asked of the countries in question is for them to come up with a timetable for the restoration of constitutional rule and, in the case of Niger, the release of ousted President Bazoum.
Their response was to declare their intention to leave ECOWAS. With the one-year notice period coming to an end in January 2025, President Tinubu further pushed for ECOWAS to extend the grace period for another six months whilst intensifying diplomatic efforts. The response to this initiative last month was evidence-free allegations that Nigeria was harbouring foreign soldiers and as sponsoring state terrorism. Whenever President Tinubu and other democratic leaders offer stoic statesmanship and an opportunity to work together towards our common interests, it is met by confected controversy designed to divert and distract from a failure to meet the basic responsibilities of public administration. I know why coup leaders might seek to do that: it’s harder to understand the motives of apologists closer to home.
On my part, since assuming the office of Minister of Foreign Affairs on 21st August 2023, I have engaged diplomatically without pause, proposing personal visits and inviting senior government officials and representatives. Response has been akin to a diplomatic cold shoulder. We constituted a ministerial advisory committee that visited Niger and Mali and facilitated the visit of the Nigerian CDS to meet with his counterpart in Niamey. I regret that a proposed return visit was suspended by Niger after a date had been set. But let there be no doubt: we will continue to pursue diplomatic efforts assiduously, with a Ministry of Foreign Affairs that has existed for 67 years.
Nigeria’s principle of strategic autonomy is one that abhors the presence of foreign forces and private military companies in our region, whether from east or west. Nigeria presently has troops on peace keeping operations in Guinea Bissau and Gambia, with Sierra Leone on the way, where it is also supporting the setting up of a logistics base in Lungi. Nigeria is also leading the actualisation of the ECOWAS standby force, all in an effort to fight terrorism and instability within our region under the rule of law. We work closely with our partners on sharing of intelligence in order to guarantee the same rights and freedoms are enjoyed by all the people of the region.
As several of my colleagues in the region remind me, we are the hegemon, whether we admit it or not. And global politics works almost like physics, with polarity, ordering principles, distribution of power, balancing, etc. Nigeria has never had expansionist tendencies, never been threatening towards our neighbours and always chosen the path of peace and conciliation. This in part may have to do with the makeup of our polity and social fabric. Being such a huge country, we are used to the virtues of principled compromise. It is not by accident that we are the only country on the continent with six former leaders living in peace and harmony within our borders. Diversity, not division, is our strength. This is as true for Nigeria as it is for the smallest of countries – and collectively for all of our region.
FOREIGN POLICY AND THE PATH TO PEACE IN A DANGEROUS NEIGHBOURHOOD
News
UNFPA, Signify partner to illuminate 10,000 healthcare facilities in seven states
UNFPA, Signify partner to illuminate 10,000 healthcare facilities in seven states
…₦-free solar intervention targets underserved communities, strengthens maternal healthcare, emergency response, safety of women and girls
By: Michael Mike
The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the Signify Foundation have entered into a three-year partnership to deploy 10,000 solar lighting solutions to healthcare facilities in seven states and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), in a move to address poor lighting and improve access to essential health services in underserved communities.
The initiative, which targets hard-to-reach communities, is designed to tackle one of the often-overlooked challenges confronting healthcare delivery in Nigeria: inadequate and unreliable electricity, particularly in facilities providing maternal and reproductive healthcare services.
Under the partnership, 4,170 Philips Essential SmartBright solar streetlights and 5,830 solar floodlights will be installed across selected healthcare facilities in Borno, Yobe, Lagos, Ogun, Sokoto, Akwa Ibom and the FCT.
The first consignment of 3,334 units, comprising 1,390 solar streetlights and 1,944 solar floodlights, is expected to arrive in Nigeria before the end of 2026.
The intervention is expected to improve the safety, accessibility and operational capacity of health facilities, particularly those serving women, girls, adolescents and other vulnerable populations.
Facilities to benefit include safe spaces, youth-friendly centres, obstetric fistula centres and MAMII health facilities, where reliable lighting is critical to ensuring that patients can access services in secure and dignified environments.
The partnership also comes against the backdrop of persistent electricity challenges in underserved communities, where inadequate lighting can constrain the delivery of healthcare, particularly at night, and expose patients and health workers to additional safety risks.
For maternal healthcare facilities, the availability of reliable lighting is particularly important for emergency deliveries, obstetric interventions and other situations requiring immediate medical attention outside normal working hours.
UNFPA Resident Representative in Nigeria, Ms Muriel Mafico, said reliable electricity remained one of the strongest enablers of quality healthcare, describing the partnership as an important intervention towards improving health outcomes in both development and humanitarian settings.
She said the provision of solar lighting would strengthen healthcare delivery by improving local infrastructure and enabling communities to extend service hours.
“This partnership will strengthen Nigeria’s healthcare delivery system by improving local lighting infrastructure.
“Reliable lighting will enable communities to extend service hours, strengthen emergency and maternal health responses, and improve confidentiality and safety for survivors in designated safe spaces. It will also create opportunities for youth engagement,” Mafico said.
She added that illuminating critical community facilities would support safer environments, strengthen community resilience and contribute to better outcomes for vulnerable populations.
Beyond healthcare delivery, the initiative is expected to improve protection and dignity for women and girls, particularly survivors of gender-based violence who require access to confidential support services in safe spaces.
The lighting intervention will also benefit adolescents and young people accessing youth-friendly centres, where a secure and welcoming environment is essential to encouraging them to seek information and essential health services.
Director of the Signify Foundation, Yue Cui, said the partnership reflected the importance of providing healthcare facilities with the infrastructure required to deliver services safely and effectively.
She said quality healthcare depended not only on medical personnel, medicines and equipment but also on creating safe and adequately lit environments for patients and health workers.
“Solar lighting is a practical solution, it is easy to install and maintain, and can serve communities for years.
“At a time when humanitarian resources are stretched, we hope this partnership shows how our interventions can make essential healthcare services safer and more accessible,” Cui said.
The partnership builds on previous interventions by the organisations in Syria and Sudan, extending their collaboration on sustainable lighting solutions to underserved communities in Nigeria.
The three-year programme also highlights the growing role of renewable energy interventions in strengthening essential social infrastructure, particularly in communities where conventional electricity supply remains unreliable or inaccessible.
UNFPA, the United Nations’ sexual and reproductive health agency, works towards a world where every pregnancy is wanted, every childbirth is safe and every young person’s potential is fulfilled.
The Signify Foundation, an independent non-profit organisation primarily funded by Signify, works to expand access to lighting among underserved communities across the world.
With the first consignment expected before the end of 2026, the partnership is expected to provide an additional layer of support to healthcare facilities, particularly those operating in difficult humanitarian and development environments.
UNFPA, Signify partner to illuminate 10,000 healthcare facilities in seven states
News
Nigeria, India Sign Human Rights Agreement as Fagbemi Pledges Support for Implementation
Nigeria, India Sign Human Rights Agreement as Fagbemi Pledges Support for Implementation
…AGF calls for stronger institutional independence, practical safeguards for citizens amid emerging AI-related human rights challenges; NHRC records 384,196 complaints in October
By: Michael Mike
Nigeria and India have signed a bilateral agreement to strengthen human rights protection, institutional capacity and access to justice, with the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Prince Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, pledging the Federal Government’s support for its implementation.

Fagbemi described the agreement as a strategic partnership between the two countries, stressing that its success would ultimately be measured by its impact on ordinary citizens, particularly vulnerable and marginalised groups seeking justice.
The agreement, executed between Nigeria’s National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) and its Indian counterpart, is designed to deepen institutional cooperation, facilitate knowledge transfer, promote technical exchanges and strengthen operational capacity in addressing human rights violations.
The Attorney-General stated the Federal Government’s position when he received a joint delegation of the two commissions at the Federal Ministry of Justice in Abuja, describing the partnership as timely in an increasingly interconnected world where effective human rights protection requires stronger legal frameworks, institutional collaboration and respect for the rule of law.
The development followed an engagement between the two commissions and the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) at the Supreme Court Complex, Abuja, as part of a working visit by the Indian delegation.
The Nigerian delegation was led by the Executive Secretary of NHRC, Chief Tony Ojukwu, SAN, OFR, FICMC, while the Indian delegation was headed by the Chairperson of India’s NHRC, Justice V. Ramasubramanian, accompanied by the Commission’s Joint Secretary, Mr Samir Kumar.
Fagbemi said the partnership brought together two major democracies with shared common-law traditions, diverse populations and dynamic constitutional frameworks. He also expressed satisfaction with the thematic areas identified for cooperation under the agreement.
He specifically highlighted access to justice and the protection of digital rights as critical areas requiring urgent attention, particularly as emerging technologies, including Artificial Intelligence (AI), continue to reshape society and create new human rights concerns.
According to him, both countries must develop legal safeguards to protect data privacy, prevent algorithmic bias and safeguard civic space, while ensuring that technological advancement does not undermine fundamental freedoms.
He said the Ministry of Justice expected the two commissions to produce actionable research and policy recommendations capable of addressing these emerging challenges.
Beyond emerging technologies, the Attorney-General stressed that Nigeria’s commitment to human rights must be reflected in the practical implementation of constitutional guarantees and international obligations rather than merely in the existence of legal provisions.
He cited the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, which Nigeria domesticated through the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act, Cap. A9, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004, as a major instrument underpinning the country’s human rights jurisprudence.
The Charter provides important protections relating to non-discrimination, human dignity, fair trial and personal liberty, reinforcing the fundamental rights guaranteed under Nigeria’s Constitution.
Fagbemi maintained that the true measure of a country’s commitment to human rights was its ability to translate constitutional provisions into accessible institutions, accountable public authorities and an independent judiciary.
He assured the Indian delegation that the Federal Ministry of Justice fully supported the bilateral initiative and was prepared to facilitate technical engagements, joint legal reviews and policy consultations aimed at improving the efficiency of the justice sector.
The Attorney-General also reaffirmed the institutional independence of Nigeria’s National Human Rights Commission, stressing that its autonomy was essential to its credibility and effectiveness.
He specifically drew attention to Section 6(3) of the National Human Rights Commission (Amendment) Act, 2010, which provides that the Commission, in exercising its statutory functions, shall not be subject to the direction or control of any other authority or person.
According to him, the administration has continued to respect and protect the Commission’s statutory independence, describing it as fundamental to institutional integrity.
He further noted that the relationship between the NHRC and the Federal Ministry of Justice had been characterised by constructive institutional synergy, mutual respect and a shared commitment to advancing human rights.
The Attorney-General commended Ojukwu and the Nigerian commission for spearheading the bilateral initiative, while expressing appreciation to the Indian delegation for bringing its expertise and institutional experience to the partnership.
Meanwhile, Ojukwu has disclosed that the National Human Rights Commission recorded 384,196 complaints across its 38 locations nationwide in October 2026, representing an increase of more than 45,000 complaints, or 14 per cent, compared with September.
Presenting the Commission’s October 2026 Human Rights Situation Dashboard, the NHRC Executive Secretary said the monthly report remained an important part of the Commission’s commitment to transparency, accountability and evidence-based human rights protection.
He explained that the dashboard provides an opportunity to assess the country’s human rights situation, identify emerging patterns of violations and draw the attention of relevant authorities and stakeholders to issues requiring intervention.
Ojukwu stressed that the dashboard was more than a statistical report, noting that every complaint represented a person, family or community whose rights and dignity deserved protection.
According to him, the increase in complaints could partly reflect greater awareness of human rights and improved access to the Commission’s complaint mechanisms, while also underscoring the continuing challenges confronting individuals and communities across the country.
The October data showed that complaints relating to freedom from discrimination constituted the largest thematic category, with 217,243 complaints.
Of this figure, 184,624 were recorded under the protection of internally displaced persons, highlighting the scale of protection needs among displaced populations and the importance of ensuring that displacement does not deprive individuals and families of their dignity, security and access to basic rights.
Ojukwu said the figures reinforced the need for public institutions to remain responsive, accountable and guided by their human rights obligations.
The NHRC Executive Secretary also highlighted persistent insecurity as a major human rights concern during the reporting period, citing reports of killings, armed attacks and abductions across different parts of the country.
He said the Commission’s Human Rights Observatory documented incidents involving attacks on farming communities, travellers, students, traditional leaders and security personnel.
Particularly concerning were reports of mass killings and abductions in parts of Taraba, Borno, Zamfara, Niger and Plateau States, among other locations.
According to Ojukwu, the incidents have direct human rights implications, affecting the rights to life, liberty, dignity and security of person, disrupting livelihoods, restricting freedom of movement and exposing children and other vulnerable persons to further risks.
He urged relevant security agencies to intensify efforts to protect affected communities, rescue abducted persons and ensure that perpetrators were brought to justice in accordance with the law.
The Commission also expressed concern over the continuing vulnerability of women and children to sexual and gender-based violence, exploitation and abuse.
Ojukwu disclosed that the October Observatory recorded several incidents involving alleged rape and sexual abuse of children, trafficking, domestic violence and other forms of abuse.
Reports of children subjected to severe physical violence, abandonment and neglect further demonstrated the need for stronger child protection mechanisms.
He called for stronger preventive measures, prompt and effective investigations, support for survivors and improved access to justice.
The Commission also documented alleged violations by public authorities and security personnel, alongside concerns relating to freedom of expression and civic space.
Ojukwu reiterated that democratic participation must be protected and disagreements must not be resolved through violence or intimidation. He also stressed the importance of investigating allegations of abuse by public officials through appropriate accountability mechanisms.
The Executive Secretary further raised concerns over electoral violence and political intolerance ahead of the January elections, calling on political actors to exercise restraint and conduct themselves within the provisions of electoral laws and human rights standards.
He emphasised that elections, both in process and outcomes, reflected the interplay of various human rights, with the right to participation serving as a cornerstone of constitutional democracy.
However, he observed that the playing field of the electoral process had not been level, inclusive or peaceful.
Ojukwu said the Commission had witnessed rising electoral violence and political intolerance in recent weeks, urging political actors to respect human rights and the law.
He also reiterated the Commission’s call for the prosecution of persons who had incited hateful and divisive speeches.
Despite the challenges, Ojukwu acknowledged developments during the reporting period that demonstrated the continuing relevance of institutions and processes in advancing human rights protection.
He cited decisions of the ECOWAS Community Court of Justice, including cases concerning the rights of persons in detention and the protection of communal land rights, as examples of the importance of access to justice and regional human rights accountability.
He also highlighted the Commission’s advocacy for economic and social rights during Nigeria’s 66th Independence Anniversary, when it called for rights-based development and equal justice for all.
Similarly, during World Teachers’ Day, the Commission emphasised the need for increased investment in teachers, schools and learning facilities, recognising that the right to quality education required safe learning environments and adequately supported teachers.
Ojukwu also highlighted the Commission’s collaboration with the Centre for Human Rights, University of Pretoria, and BAOBAB for Women’s Rights on the protection of women’s rights.
The Commission convened a two-day stakeholders’ engagement on Nigeria’s implementation of the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa, popularly known as the Maputo Protocol.
The engagement brought together government representatives and civil society organisations to discuss implementation of the Protocol, including the responsibilities of government institutions and the contribution of civil society through monitoring, documentation and shadow reporting.
The Commission also welcomed the participation of the Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Women in Africa, Honourable Commissioner Janet Ramatoulie Sallah-Njie.
Earlier, during the engagement with the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Ojukwu emphasised the complementary responsibilities of the judiciary and national human rights institutions in protecting fundamental freedoms, upholding the rule of law and ensuring access to justice.
He identified complaint management, Alternative Dispute Resolution, security sector accountability, comparative legal research, digital rights, Artificial Intelligence ethics and environmental justice as priority areas for cooperation between both countries.
The Chief Justice reaffirmed the commitment of the Nigerian Judiciary to human rights protection and encouraged both commissions to exchange experiences and adopt best practices, particularly in strengthening safeguards for vulnerable groups, including women, children and persons with disabilities.
The Indian delegation described the engagement as significant to relations between the two countries, noting that the MoU represented a first-of-its-kind institutional partnership for India’s National Human Rights Commission.
According to Ojukwu, the agreement provides a framework for cooperation in the exchange of expertise and best practices, capacity building, joint research and publications, as well as engagement on regional and international human rights issues.
He said the partnership would provide an opportunity for both institutions to learn from each other’s experiences, deepen institutional capacity, broaden their knowledge base and strengthen their respective approaches to the promotion and protection of human rights.
The NHRC Executive Secretary expressed the Commission’s commitment to translating the agreement into practical programmes and sustained cooperation through deliberate planning, regular engagement and the implementation of mutually agreed activities.
The agreement is expected to promote sustained institutional exchanges, strengthen complaint-handling mechanisms, improve professional capacity and encourage comparative research into legal and policy approaches to human rights protection.
Ojukwu also stressed that human rights protection could not be achieved by the Commission acting alone, requiring the commitment of government institutions at all levels, security and law enforcement agencies, the justice sector, civil society organisations, development partners, the media and citizens.
He said the NHRC remained committed to strengthening its monitoring and reporting mechanisms, improving the handling and resolution of complaints, and ensuring that documented concerns informed policy, institutional reforms and appropriate interventions.
He maintained that the Commission’s objective was not merely to record violations after they occurred, but to contribute to a system in which violations were prevented, victims obtained justice and public institutions were held accountable.
Fagbemi, however, cautioned that the ultimate benchmark of the agreement must go beyond official engagements and institutional exchanges to deliver tangible improvements in the lives of citizens, especially those most vulnerable to violations and denied access to justice.
He expressed confidence that the partnership would advance the shared commitment of both countries to human dignity, justice and the protection of fundamental rights.
Nigeria, India Sign Human Rights Agreement as Fagbemi Pledges Support for Implementation
News
19 Nigerian Pension Funds Express Interest in Proposed $750m Infrastructure Fund
19 Nigerian Pension Funds Express Interest in Proposed $750m Infrastructure Fund
…UK-backed FSD Africa partners pension industry to mobilise $600m in domestic capital for energy, transport and digital infrastructure
Michael Olugbode in Abuja
By: Michael Mike
Nigeria’s pension industry is seeking to mobilise approximately $600 million from domestic pension funds for a proposed $750 million infrastructure investment platform, which has already attracted interest from 19 Nigerian pension funds.
The initiative, known as the Pension Industry Infrastructure Platform (PIIP), is being developed by the Pension Industry Leadership Council (PILC) in partnership with UK-funded specialist development agency, FSD Africa, to finance infrastructure projects in Nigeria and selected markets across the region.
The partnership was formalised through the signing of an agreement to support the development of the proposed fund.
Under the agreement, FSD Africa will provide PILC with expert advice and technical support, including assistance in selecting a fund manager through a competitive process, engaging potential investors and Development Finance Institutions (DFIs), building capacity and supporting necessary regulatory reforms.
The initiative, developed by Nigerian Pension Fund Administrators (PFAs), with support from the National Pension Commission (PenCom) and FSD Africa, seeks to bring together pension funds and development finance to provide long-term financing for infrastructure projects.
UK Deputy High Commissioner in Lagos, Jonny Baxter, said the partnership reflected the shared ambition of Nigeria and the United Kingdom to deepen Nigeria’s capital markets, mobilise domestic investment and channel long-term capital into the real economy.
He said the UK was proud to partner with Nigeria’s pension industry and PenCom to advance the investment initiative.
“Both our countries are prioritising tackling the challenge of attracting more domestic capital, including from pension funds, into the real economy. It is great to see Nigeria making concrete progress on its efforts and be a part of those opportunities to turn this ambition into investment, jobs, and economic growth,” Baxter said.
Chair of PILC and Director-General of PenCom, Omolola Oloworaran, described the proposed platform as timely, saying the pension industry was committed to mobilising its long-term savings capital for infrastructure development while safeguarding contributors’ retirement savings.
“The pension industry holds the largest pool of long-term savings capital in the country, and we are committed to mobilising it to deepen infrastructure development, while safeguarding the retirement savings of contributors. This MoU is the first step we are taking as an industry, and it is just the beginning,” she said.
Chief Executive Officer of FSD Africa, Mark Napier, said the proposed investment structure held significant promise for Nigeria and Africa.
He noted that the continent had substantial institutional capital but continued to face major infrastructure funding deficits.
“We have observed for several years now the paradox of Africa having significant institutional capital while at the same time facing big infrastructure funding deficits. We are keen to work with PenCom and the pension industry in Nigeria to address this and unlock the capital they manage towards Nigeria’s priority infrastructure,” Napier said.
The proposed platform is targeting an initial capital mobilisation of $350 million at its first close, expected in 2027, before scaling up to $750 million.
At its final target size, PIIP aims to mobilise approximately $600 million from Nigerian pension funds and at least $150 million from development finance institutions.
An initial assessment of Nigeria’s infrastructure pipeline identified 39 projects with potential relevance to the platform, representing approximately $20 billion in investment needs.
The platform will invest in equity and quasi-equity capital, with at least 60 per cent of its portfolio allocated to projects in Nigeria and the remainder available for selected regional investments.
Its proposed structure will comprise a naira-denominated core investment fund and a separate co-investment vehicle, allowing participating pension funds to invest alongside the core fund in selected projects.
A parallel foreign-currency vehicle may also be established to accommodate international investors.
The structure is designed to provide institutional investors with access to professionally managed, long-term investment opportunities while helping to finance infrastructure projects that improve connectivity, support business growth and contribute to Nigeria’s wider economic development.
19 Nigerian Pension Funds Express Interest in Proposed $750m Infrastructure Fund
-
News3 years agoRoger Federer’s Shock as DNA Results Reveal Myla and Charlene Are Not His Biological Children
-
Opinions5 years agoTHE PLIGHT OF FARIDA
-
News2 years agoFAILED COUP IN BURKINA FASO: HOW TRAORÉ NARROWLY ESCAPED ASSASSINATION PLOT AMID FOREIGN INTERFERENCE CLAIMS
-
Opinions5 years agoPOLICE CHARGE ROOMS, A MINTING PRESS
-
News3 years agoEYN: Rev. Billi, Distortion of History, and The Living Tamarind Tree
-
ACADEMICS3 years agoA History of Biu” (2015) and The Lingering Bura-Pabir Question (1)
-
Columns3 years agoArmy University Biu: There is certain interest, but certainly not from Borno.
-
Politics1 year ago2027: Why Hon. Midala Balami Must Go, as Youths in Hawul and Asikira/Uba Federal Constituency Reject ₦500,000 as Sallah Gift
