Nine-Year-Old Girl Found Dead in Uncompleted Building in Plateau

By: Zagazola Makama

A nine-year-old girl has been found dead under disturbing circumstances in the Alibras area of Barkin Ladi Local Government Area of Plateau State, sparking calls for a thorough investigation.

The incident reportedly occurred at about 7:00 p.m. on Friday, Nov. 6, 2026, when the girl’s body was discovered inside an uncompleted building in the area.

According to a statement by the Secretary of the Media Committee of the Barkin Ladi Muslim Ummah Forum, security personnel who arrived at the scene discovered bloodstains inside the building where the body was found.

Further examination reportedly revealed severe mutilation of the child’s private parts.
The deceased was identified as the daughter of Malam Yusuf, younger brother of Malam Ahmad.

Police and military personnel subsequently evacuated the body for further investigation and medical examination.

The incident has thrown the community into shock, with the Muslim Ummah Forum calling on the Nigeria Police Force and other relevant security agencies to conduct a thorough, impartial and speedy investigation to identify those responsible.

The forum also urged residents to remain calm, cooperate with investigators and provide any information that could assist in the investigation.

It expressed condolences to the bereaved family and prayed for the repose of the child’s soul.

Nine-Year-Old Girl Found Dead in Uncompleted Building in Plateau

The Engine of the Ticket: How Kashim Shettima Redefined Mobilisation Strategy

By Abubakar M. Kareto

Kashim Shettima has injected rare force into the Tinubu re-election campaign from the opening flag-off to the ongoing state rallies. His presence is constant, his pace relentless, and his message consistent. Where others might conserve energy for selected stops, he has treated every venue as decisive ground. The result is a campaign that feels driven rather than managed, and that difference is visible to supporters and opponents alike.

Physical commitment marks his approach. At the Cross River rally he and the party chairman sprinted toward the podium before breaking into his familiar dance steps, turning arrival into performance. In Port Harcourt he again took the stage with lively moves that lifted the crowd. These moments are not accidents. They signal fitness, confidence, and readiness to match the intensity expected of a national ticket in a competitive cycle. Supporters respond because they see a principal who refuses to stand still.

His speeches carry equal weight. In Rivers he framed the state as the centre of political arithmetic, urging voters to renew the trust given four years earlier. He defended the difficult reforms of the administration, rejected the language of collapse, and projected a path toward a one-trillion-dollar economy. He has also drawn clear lines against rivals, describing their records and arguments without soft edges. The combination of defence and attack keeps the campaign on the front foot.

Strategy sits behind the energy. Shettima understands that loyalty must be visible and repeated. By appearing in multiple South-South states in rapid succession, dancing with local leaders, and naming precise vote targets, he converts abstract party strength into concrete local expectation. The mathematics he speaks of is practical: registered voters, collected cards, and the percentage required to secure the mandate. That clarity turns rallies into mobilisation rather than spectacle alone.

The cumulative effect is a campaign that projects continuity and appetite. Party workers see a vice president willing to run, dance, argue, and stay on message across long days. Opponents are forced to respond to a ticket that looks energetic rather than defensive. In a political culture that often rewards caution, Shettima has chosen visible effort, and that choice has defined the early phase of the 2027 contest.

No other figure on the ticket has matched this sustained intensity. The energy, desire, support, and commitment he has brought cannot be manufactured by schedule or speechwriter. They come from a principal who treats the campaign as personal work. That quality is the strongest evidence that the effort is genuine and the standard set by him remains the measure for the rest of the field.

Author Bio:

Abubakar M. Kareto is a Public Affairs Analyst and Communications Strategist focusing on governance, policies, economy, and institutional reforms across Nigeria and Africa. He can be reached on X @amkareto and via email at amkareto@gmail.com.

The Engine of the Ticket: How Kashim Shettima Redefined Mobilisation Strategy

IPCR Dialogue: Zulu Blames Governance Failures, Hatred for Nigeria’s Deepening Insecurity

…SAN urges local government autonomy, stronger community leadership, international cooperation to tackle extremism

By: Michael Mike
Professor Shehu Abdullahi Zuru, SAN, has blamed weak governance, widespread poverty, social injustice and the erosion of community leadership for worsening insecurity and divisions in Nigeria, urging government and non-state actors to confront the underlying causes of the country’s challenges.

Zuru, who delivered the lead paper at a policy dialogue organised by the Institute for Peace and Conflict Resolution (IPCR) in Abuja, said the “Us versus Them” mentality thrived in societies where hatred, intolerance and social divisions had overwhelmed shared values and a sense of common humanity.

He warned that unless Nigeria addressed the governance failures and grievances fuelling social discontent, efforts to promote religious freedom, national cohesion and security would remain inadequate.

The dialogue, organised by the Network of Policymakers and Religious Leaders to Support Peace, Security and Reconciliation in Nigeria (NPMRL), was held on Friday under the theme, “Moving Beyond ‘Us versus Them’: Strengthening Local Governance, Security and Foreign Relations to Protect Freedom of Religion or Belief in Nigeria.”

Zuru traced the consequences of identity-based hatred to historical atrocities, including Nazi racial supremacy, the 1994 Rwandan genocide and the 1992 Bosnian conflict, arguing that intolerance undermined social cohesion and the moral foundations of society.

He said Nigeria’s worsening situation was linked to poor policy choices, persistent poverty, declining confidence in the justice system and the inability of political leadership to build consensus around national priorities.

According to him, weakened leadership among religious institutions, traditional rulers, community figures and other influential non-state actors has further contributed to the country’s governance and security challenges.

“The compromised and receding local leadership by both state and non-state actors … as well as moribund formal institutions of public policy and public authority and accountability are only responsible for the current state of hopelessness in our dear country today,” he said.

Zuru identified local government autonomy as a critical requirement for effective governance, particularly at the grassroots, urging the Federal Government to address the issue decisively.

He argued that stronger local government institutions would improve public policy delivery and enable communities to respond more effectively to their development and security needs.

He also challenged religious and community leaders to take greater responsibility for addressing intolerance, rebuilding trust and influencing young people positively.

With killings and displacement continuing in different parts of the country, he said community leaders must be prepared to speak truthfully to political authorities and help shape policies that respond to the country’s security and development challenges.

On national security, Zuru argued that terrorism, banditry and other forms of organised criminality had transnational dimensions, involving cross-border networks of recruitment, financing and other forms of support.

He said Nigeria could not effectively confront such threats in isolation and called for stronger bilateral and multilateral partnerships, particularly in intelligence gathering, military capacity and counter-insurgency operations.

“Therefore, clandestine and proactive diplomacy is mandatory for the success of every counter initiative meant to subdue these threats,” he said, adding that Nigeria needed genuine international partners willing to support its efforts against insecurity.

Zuru maintained that foreign relations should be treated as an important component of national security policy, given the cross-border character of extremist and criminal networks.

Earlier, the Director-General of IPCR, Dr Joseph Ochogwu, warned that divisive narratives presenting complex security challenges exclusively through religious identities could deepen mistrust and undermine national cohesion.

Ochogwu, said legitimate concerns about violations of freedom of religion or belief must be addressed without allowing public discourse to reinforce religious divisions.

He called for impartial security responses, inclusive governance, accountability for human rights violations and constructive engagement among religious leaders, policymakers and community institutions.

He said protecting religious freedom required more than constitutional guarantees, stressing the importance of effective institutions, consistent application of the law and mechanisms for preventing conflicts before they escalated.

Ochogwu also identified local governance, security governance and foreign relations as critical areas requiring stronger policy attention, urging stakeholders to translate dialogue into practical recommendations and measurable interventions.

He noted that Nigeria’s Constitution guaranteed freedom of thought, conscience and religion, prohibited the adoption of a state religion and protected citizens against discrimination on religious grounds.

The dialogue also featured Reverend John Joseph Hayab as discussant and brought together policymakers, religious leaders and other stakeholders to examine ways of strengthening religious freedom, security and peaceful coexistence.

The IPCR said the engagement was part of efforts to strengthen collaboration between religious leadership and public institutions in addressing conflict and promoting national reconciliation.

IPCR Dialogue: Zulu Blames Governance Failures, Hatred for Nigeria’s Deepening Insecurity