Connect with us

News

China Reaffirms One-China Principle, Criticizes Taiwan’s Foreign Engagements and Calls for Media Caution in Nigeria

Published

2 hours ago

on

China Reaffirms One-China Principle, Criticizes Taiwan’s Foreign Engagements and Calls for Media Caution in Nigeria

By: Michael Mike

China has strongly reiterated its One China principle, insisting that Taiwan is an inseparable part of its territory, while criticizing recent international engagements involving Taiwan’s leadership and foreign media interactions, including visits by Nigerian journalists to Taipei-linked institutions.

The remarks were made during a policy briefing that combined historical arguments, diplomatic assertions, and warnings directed at international media over Taiwan-related reporting.

At the centre of the statement was the recent overseas diplomatic activity of Taiwan’s President Lai Ching-te, including a visit to Eswatini where he met members of the royal household. Beijing described the visit as part of efforts to expand Taiwan’s international presence and advance separatist objectives. Taiwan, however, continues to operate its foreign engagements as part of its self-governing system, maintaining unofficial relations with a limited number of countries.

Chinese officials also raised concerns over recent interactions between a small group of Nigerian journalists and Taiwan’s external affairs representatives, as well as discussions around strengthening Taiwan’s trade presence in Nigeria. Beijing argued that such engagements challenge established diplomatic arrangements between China and countries that recognize the One China principle.

China’s position is rooted in what it describes as centuries of historical governance over Taiwan. Officials cited early administrative links dating back to imperial China, arguing that the island has long been under Chinese jurisdiction in historical records.

Speaking at an occasion in Abuja, the Counselor, Embassy of the People’s Republic of China in Nigeria Ms.Dong Hairong’s speech. referenced key Second World War-era agreements, including the Cairo Declaration (1943) and the Potsdam Proclamation (1945), which stated that territories taken by Japan, including Taiwan, should be returned to China following Japan’s defeat. Beijing maintains that Japan’s surrender and subsequent acceptance of these terms legally confirmed Taiwan’s restoration to Chinese sovereignty.

She said following the Chinese civil war and the establishment of two rival administrations in 1949, the government of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) asserted itself as the sole legal authority representing China. The opposing government retreated to Taiwan, leading to the long-standing political separation across the Taiwan Strait.

She also cited United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 (1971) as a decisive legal foundation for its position. The resolution recognized the People’s Republic of China as “the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations” and expelled representatives of Chiang Kai-shek’s administration.

She argued that this resolution establishes the One China principle in international law and leaves no room for “two Chinas” or “one China, one Taiwan.” According to Beijing, more than 180 countries—including Nigeria—maintain diplomatic relations with China based on this framework.

She reaffirmed that national reunification remains a central long-term objective, describing it as part of the broader “national rejuvenation” strategy.

She accused Taiwan’s ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) of promoting “de-Sinicization” and separatist policies, while Taiwan continues to insist on its democratic governance and separate political system.

She noted that despite political tensions, policies encouraging cross-strait exchanges in trade, culture, education, and youth engagement are in place. She also referenced past evacuations of Taiwan residents from crisis zones with Chinese diplomatic assistance as evidence of practical cooperation between both sides.

The briefing placed strong emphasis on Nigeria’s relationship with China, noting that diplomatic ties established in 1971 were built on Nigeria’s recognition of the One China principle.

She stated that Nigeria has consistently affirmed that it recognizes the People’s Republic of China as the sole legitimate government of China and considers Taiwan part of Chinese territory. This position, it said, forms the foundation of bilateral relations.

While also highlighting expanding economic cooperation with Nigeria and Africa, including infrastructure projects and trade initiatives aimed at strengthening South–South relations. Recent developments include Chinese-supported regional institutions in Abuja and tariff reductions for African exports entering the Chinese market.

The Chinese official urged Nigerian journalists and international media organisations to adhere strictly to the One China framework in their reporting.

She cautioned against describing Taiwan in terms that imply statehood or recognizing official diplomatic titles inconsistent with Beijing’s position, warning that such portrayals could undermine diplomatic relations.

She said Beijing stance is based on historical records, international agreements, and United Nations resolutions, while Taiwan continues to operate as a self-governing entity with its own political system and foreign relations network.

A public affairs analyst and political strategist, Segun Showunmi, said Nigeria’s continued support for the One-China Principle remains central to the growth of diplomatic, economic and strategic relations between Nigeria and China in an increasingly multipolar world.

In a paper titled “The One-China Principle and the Next Phase of China–Nigeria Relations in an Emerging Multipolar World,” Showunmi argued that the relationship between both countries was built on mutual trust, sovereign respect and non-interference, principles he said have strengthened cooperation over the decades.

According to him, Nigeria formally embraced the One-China Principle in 1971 when diplomatic relations were established with Beijing, recognizing the government of the People’s Republic of China as the sole legitimate representative of China.

He traced the roots of the policy to the 1949 Chinese revolution led by Mao Zedong, noting that successive Chinese leaders transformed the doctrine into a central pillar of China’s foreign policy and international engagement.

Showunmi stated that Nigeria’s consistency on the issue created confidence between both nations, resulting in significant Chinese investments in infrastructure and strategic sectors across the country.

He highlighted projects such as the Abuja–Kaduna Railway, Lagos–Ibadan Railway, airport terminal expansions, road construction, telecommunications development, power projects and the Lekki Deep Sea Port as examples of Chinese-backed interventions that have contributed to Nigeria’s infrastructure modernization.

According to him, China has emerged as a major economic alternative for African countries seeking development partnerships without stringent political conditions, adding that Nigeria has also benefited from expanded trade opportunities, technology transfer, educational cooperation and diplomatic coordination in multilateral institutions.

The analyst, however, argued that the next phase of China–Nigeria relations must move beyond symbolic diplomatic solidarity to a more structured and strategic partnership capable of supporting industrialization and long-term development.

He called for the establishment of a China–Nigeria Strategic Economic Council to coordinate industrial policy, energy transition planning, artificial intelligence, critical minerals and advanced manufacturing.

Showunmi also urged the Nigerian government to negotiate stronger local content provisions in Chinese-funded projects to ensure the development of indigenous engineering expertise and domestic supply chains.

On his part, the Director of the Abuja School of Social and Political Thoughts and Dean of the Faculty of Law at Ave Maria University, Prof. Sam Amadi, urged African states to carefully calibrate their foreign policy on the One-China question, warning against formal diplomatic engagement with Taiwan while advocating continued trade within defined limits.

Speaking at a media salon on the One-China Principle held at the China General Chamber of Commerce in Nigeria, Amadi said the distinction between the One-China principle and One-China policy is often misunderstood in international diplomacy.

“The One-China principle and One-China policy are clear, but difficult to operationalise,” he said, adding that while the terms appear similar, “from a diplomatic perspective, they look the same, but they’re not exactly the same.”

The former foreign affairs adviser under President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua explained that the One-China principle, as advanced by Beijing, asserts that there is only one China, governed by the Communist Party of China, and that Taiwan is part of China under eventual reunification.

He noted that many countries adopt what he described as “strategic ambiguity,” allowing them to recognize Beijing officially while still maintaining informal economic and trade relations with Taiwan.

“The problem has always been: how do you acknowledge Beijing’s claim and deal with the real-world situation of engaging with Taiwan?” he said.

Amadi argued that Africa’s traditional emphasis on territorial integrity aligns broadly with China’s position, but acknowledged that modern diplomatic and economic realities complicate strict interpretations.

“Africa has a history with keeping territories intact… internal disagreement should not be taken to represent separate statehood,” he said.

However, he warned against what he termed “sovereignty for rent,” describing situations where diplomatic recognition is exchanged for economic or political incentives.

“One of the things Taiwan is doing is what we call sovereignty for rent—you pay, you acknowledge our sovereignty,” he said.

Outlining policy options, Amadi said African states currently fall into different camps ranging from full alignment with Beijing to mixed and ambiguous engagement strategies.

“My position is that African countries should never have diplomatic engagement with Taiwan, but should calibrate trade agreements carefully,” he stated, emphasizing the need for consistency with the One-China framework while acknowledging global economic realities.

China Reaffirms One-China Principle, Criticizes Taiwan’s Foreign Engagements and Calls for Media Caution in Nigeria

Related Topics:
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Zulum: Consensus Remains Preferred Option for APC Primaries in Borno

Published

1 hour ago

on

May 15, 2026

By

Zulum: Consensus Remains Preferred Option for APC Primaries in Borno

By: Our Reporter

Borno State Governor, Babagana Umara Zulum, has called on aspirants seeking various elective positions under the All Progressives Congress (APC) and party stakeholders to adopt consensus as the preferred mode for candidate emergence ahead of the party primaries.

The APC primary elections are scheduled to commence on Friday, 15 May, with the House of Representatives primaries and climax on Saturday, 23 May, with the presidential primaries.

Governor Zulum made the call on Thursday during a critical stakeholders’ meeting held at the Multipurpose Hall of the Government House in Maiduguri, stressing that consensus remains the most viable option for strengthening party unity.

“Let me start by appreciating all our stakeholders for the support and commitment to advancing the course of our great party, APC, and our administration,” Zulum said.

“As we prepare for the party primaries, which will commence on Friday, I want to remind all our aspirants contesting various elective positions that consensus is the best and most viable option for the party in our state. However, if we are unable to arrive at a consensus, we will go for direct primaries,” he added.

The governor further emphasized his commitment to democratic principles, assuring stakeholders that no candidate would be imposed on any constituency.

“As a democrat, I will not force any candidate on a particular constituency, but rather encourage us to continue consultations with stakeholders for consensus candidates to emerge,” Zulum stated.

He urged aspirants to reflect on the past, project better opportunities in the future and maintain party loyalty, noting that those who may not secure tickets in the 2027 elections could still have chances ahead.

Governor Zulum also announced that aspirants who voluntarily withdraw from contests would be considered for appointments and other opportunities at both the federal and state levels.

To facilitate consultations across the state, the governor constituted zonal consultative committees headed by the Deputy Governor, Umar Usman Kadafur, for the Southern Zone; APC Deputy National Chairman (North), Ali Bukar Dalori, for the Central Zone; and Senator Mohammed Tahir Monguno for the Northern Zone.

Governor Zulum also formally presented the APC consensus governorship candidate, Mustapha Gubio, to stakeholders, fulfilling the promise he made during the high-level stakeholders’ meeting held on 25 April.

APC Deputy National Chairman, Hon Ali Bukar Dalori, and State Chairman of the Party, Hon. Bello Ayuba, all re-echo the need for consensus as the means of primary election in the state.

They emphasized that consensus will strengthen party cohesion and unity in the run-up to the 2027 general elections.

The meeting was attended by prominent personalities, including Deputy Governor Umar Usman Kadafur, the APC consensus Gubernatorial candidate, Engr Mustapha Gubio, APC Deputy National Chairman (North), Hon. Ali Bukar Dalori, Former Governor, Senator Maina Ma’aji Lawan, Senators Mohammed Tahir Monguno, Mohammed Ali Ndume, and Kaka Shehu Lawan SAN, serving and former members of the House of Representatives, APC state chairman, former Nigerian Ambassador to China, Amb. Baba Ahmed Jidda, Speaker, Borno State House of Assembly, and other members of the House.

Others include the Secretary to the state government, the acting Chief of Staff, the Commissioner’s designate, Special Advisers, Local Government Chairmen, APC party executives, and other stakeholders.

Zulum: Consensus Remains Preferred Option for APC Primaries in Borno

Continue Reading

News

Justice Crack’s bail plea suffers setback as two lawyers clash in court over representation

Published

1 hour ago

on

May 15, 2026

By

Justice Crack’s bail plea suffers setback as two lawyers clash in court over representation

By: Michael Mike

The bail application filed by
Chidiebere Justice Mark, popularly known as Justice Crack, on Thursday suffered a setback at the Federal High Court in Abuja after two lawyers, Femi Balogun and Marshall Abubakar, clashed over who to represent him.

Justice Joyce Abdulmalik had, on May 4, fixed today for hearing of Mark’s bail request shortly after he was arraigned by the Department of State Services (DSS) and pleaded not guilty to a three-count charge.

The adjournment followed an application by Mark’s lawyer, Marshall Abubakar, who told the court of the need to admit his client to bail pending trial.

The DSS had, in the charge marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/253/2026, sued Crack, as sole defendant over alleged cybercrime offences linked to a viral video concerning the Nigerian Army.

Mark was alleged to have circulated a false information and publication of materials capable of causing public unrest.

The defendant, who was reportedly arrested by the Nigerian Army, was accused of publishing the viral video and accompanying statements through his X handle, @JusticeCrack, alleging inadequate feeding of Nigerian soldiers.

When the case was called on Thursday, Leyii Abueh, from the Federal Ministry of Justice, informed the court that the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) had taken over the matter from the DSS in line with the relevant section of the law.

However, things took a dramatic twist as Femi Balogun and Abubakar stood up to announce appearance for the same Crack.

Balogun told the court that he was briefed by Mark’s family to take up the case.

He notified the court about the defence bail application already filed.

However, Abubakar stood his ground, insisting that he was the defendant’s lawyer, who had been appearing in the case and he had not been disengaged from handling Crack’s matter.

Justice Abdulmalik then asked the defendant to identify his lawyer and Mark pointed at Balogun.

Against this development, Abubakar applied to withdraw all the processes he filed in respect of the case, including the bail application which Balogun had relied on.

The judge struck out the processes filed by Abubakar and adjourned until May 18 for hearing of the fresh bail application.

Justice Crack’s bail plea suffers setback as two lawyers clash in court over representation

Continue Reading

News

Nigeria, Germany Deepen Strategic Partnership €65 Million Development Package, €300 Million Credit Facility and Expanded Economic Cooperation Announced

Published

1 hour ago

on

May 15, 2026

By

Nigeria, Germany Deepen Strategic Partnership €65 Million Development Package, €300 Million Credit Facility and Expanded Economic Cooperation Announced

By: Michael Mike

Nigeria and Germany have reinforced their long-standing development and economic partnership with new commitments spanning financial cooperation, private sector investment, skills development, energy transition, agriculture, and digital transformation.

The renewed collaboration was reaffirmed during high-level bilateral engagements and the signing of a Summary of Record in Abuja, where both governments reviewed progress in ongoing programmes and agreed on expanded areas of cooperation aimed at strengthening Nigeria’s reform and development agenda.

Nigeria’s Minister of Budget and Economic Planning, Senator Abubakar Atiku Bagudu, described the partnership as a key milestone in Nigeria–Germany relations, noting that it reflects shared priorities anchored on mutual respect, sustainable development, and inclusive economic growth.

He expressed Nigeria’s appreciation to the Government of Germany, including the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy, KfW Development Bank, GIZ, and other implementing partners, for what he described as constructive and forward-looking negotiations.

A major outcome of the engagements is Germany’s commitment of approximately €65 million in new financial and technical cooperation across agreed priority sectors. In addition, both countries discussed a proposed €300 million export credit guarantee framework, designed to mobilize private investment and expand long-term financing for strategic infrastructure and development projects in Nigeria.

Officials from both sides said the financing arrangements are intended not only to provide direct support but also to unlock broader capital flows into key sectors of the Nigerian economy.

The expanded partnership prioritizes agricultural transformation, climate and energy transition, skills development, health systems strengthening, and inclusive economic growth.

German institutions and private sector actors including Siemens and SAP played a visible role in the engagement, showcasing ongoing projects in Nigeria. Siemens highlighted its involvement in energy sector skills development and power infrastructure-related initiatives, while SAP presented digital solutions aimed at modernizing tax administration and strengthening Nigeria’s digital governance systems.

The German delegation, led by Africa Director at BMZ, Mr. Philip Knill, also referenced ambitions to support large-scale skills development programmes, including proposals aimed at training up to one million Nigerians in technical, digital, and vocational competencies to enhance productivity and employment outcomes.

Both sides acknowledged Nigeria’s ongoing economic reforms under the Renewed Hope Agenda, including macroeconomic stabilization efforts, energy sector reforms, healthcare transformation, and initiatives to improve the investment climate and stimulate private sector-led growth.

Knill expressed confidence in Nigeria’s reform trajectory, describing the country as a key partner in Africa with significant potential for industrial expansion, agricultural modernization, and energy transition.

Nigeria, in turn, reaffirmed its commitment to ensuring that all agreed programmes are nationally owned, properly coordinated, and aligned with long-term development frameworks, including the National Development Plan 2026–2030 and Agenda 2050.

As part of the broader engagement, German officials undertook field visits and technical discussions with Nigerian ministries and agencies, including energy infrastructure sites and development programme locations.

They highlighted existing cooperation outcomes, noting that joint Nigeria–Germany programmes have already supported hundreds of thousands of smallholder farmers, improved access to training, and strengthened thousands of small and medium-sized enterprises across the country. These interventions, they said, have contributed to increased incomes and improved productivity in key sectors.

In the energy sector, both sides discussed ongoing efforts to expand generation capacity and improve transmission systems, with Germany expressing readiness to continue supporting Nigeria’s power sector reforms and renewable energy ambitions.

A key feature of the engagement was the emphasis on development cooperation as a catalyst for private sector investment, innovation, and job creation. Officials stressed that future cooperation must go beyond aid, focusing instead on leveraging private capital and building sustainable economic partnerships.

Knill also noted the importance of strengthening economic ties between Europe and Africa in the context of global instability, including conflicts, supply chain disruptions, and climate-related challenges.

Both governments described the agreements not as an endpoint, but as the beginning of deeper implementation-focused cooperation.

German officials emphasized a “signing today, implementation tomorrow” approach, underscoring the importance of translating agreements into measurable development outcomes. Nigeria echoed this position, reaffirming its commitment to ensuring effective coordination and delivery of agreed programmes.

The renewed Nigeria–Germany partnership marks a significant step in strengthening bilateral cooperation across economic, technological, and development sectors. With fresh financing commitments, expanded private sector involvement, and a shared focus on structural reforms and human capital development, both countries say they are positioning the partnership for greater impact in the years ahead.

The engagement is expected to accelerate ongoing programmes and open new pathways for investment, innovation, and sustainable growth across Nigeria’s priority sectors, particularly energy, agriculture, digital economy, and skills development.

Nigeria, Germany Deepen Strategic Partnership €65 Million Development Package, €300 Million Credit Facility and Expanded Economic Cooperation Announced

Continue Reading

Trending

Verified by MonsterInsights