Connect with us

Columns

Building Unity, Character and strength in the Borno council after the election, series…….1

Published

on

My Binoculars: Of partisan politicians, defection, lack of consultations and the pending rebellion of young people against the present unproductive political order

Building Unity, Character and strength in the Borno council after the election, series…….1

Now that the team has been assembled, what next?

By: Sam Kayode

In my closing campaign discuss, I congratulated everyone in advance for choosing wisely. It was a kind of spiritual pronouncement in line with my conviction of positive thinking which I share with Chairman Dauda Ilya. I am an ardent believer in the Nigerian Union of Journalist (NUJ) and what it stands for. I have never known any union that protects his own since I started practicing three decades ago. That is why I used to wonder why some seemingly renegade proprietors will establish their media outfits and forbid their staff from their rights of application to be members. You should never allow any media owner stop you from learning the ropes of being a thorough bred practitioner through the NUJ. It’s the NUJ that will transform you from an ordinary writer to a journalist.

Hear this, in some states in Nigeria, the NUJ is like a professional pool where organizations send their students on industrial attachment to go learn how to become reporters. They don’t just go to media houses but the nuj has also been recognized as a training ground. In a place like “iwe irohin” house in Abeokuta, students learn so much by being attached to officials like the chair or secretary of the council for instance. They teach them the job and they are present in every news conferences watching and learning how to ask and generate news from news makers. They learn how to walk or talk differently from an ordinary writer and how to be real gentlemen forbidden from physical fights you find in some other unions in Nigeria. They study the ethics and other trainings taught in journalism schools. There is a professional bliss in the air not just the air of cheap wedding parties which ours has been known for after a paltry sum of N15,000.  Or a situation in which street urchins take over the compound and litter the place like ours. 

In sane climes, devoid of insurgency, the only people that come to unwind have their section and they comport themselves decently or be thrown out. Outsiders or shop owners have no right to tell us how to run the place by hiding behind our generators to smoke weed even in broad daylight. They are given instructions and they obey naturally, choosing their favorite food vendor because of the way colleagues in the Exco comport themselves. The nuj is not the place for open drug taking or free meetings. People pay for the usage of every space for meetings. Meetings under the tree has its price. The one in the hall has its price. Even for parking cars inside the first half, non members should pay as much as N50 and we issue tickets. And that is why you need a security guard who will collect our revenue and remit to the union account on a daily basis. That is the only way we can begin to pick up in this post insurgency era. You will be shocked about how many 50 naira you can make in a day because people will be sure their cars cannot be stolen especially when we have paved the place with interlocking tiles.

Also Read: https://dailypost.ng/2022/10/08/iswap-kills-8-boko-haram-members-seizes-large-quantities-of-ammunition/

We must be able to eliminate a certain category of people from using our space for weddings by moving the price upwards by 100 percent if we are serious about revenue. Members too whose nuclear family must marry can be given rebates that would be decided by congress. If using the space becomes 30k, then we will not be patronized by battalions but well controlled crowds of decent people we can control. We can ask members to pay only 10 percent of that which is 3,000 for a specific number of years. And we build more toilets for nawojians that would be our eyes in the first half. Others too will have their toilets to avoid the excuse of getting into our half.

Congratulations Comrades Abdulsalam and Timothy and other challenges

Gentlemen, sometimes it takes quiet prayers and then “wisdom”  which is an ingredient we all need to live in this short life we have before us to succeed. Without wisdom you will never be able to hold on to the philosophy of “truth”  which the NUJ and even the guild of editors stands upon. I am happy that chairman Dauda Ilya has been able to exercise his powers by the appointment of two more members to help them build this council with the help of congress to take us to where we should be. Of course one of them Abdulsalam is equally a lawyer, so our first law advise will be coming from within even before going after our recognized legal firm Ayuba Damo and partners who is presently handling the case of the known diabolic woman who’s boka has told her she will still get her way like she did with other excos. God forbid!! That restaurant rightly belongs to our gentlemen nawojians. They are our colleagues and have equal rights like all of us so nobody should second rate them as just women who must only be seen by lying to them about office meant for them. One of the reasons why the last Exco made so many mistakes was because they ignored the advices of these ladies. I was present when the promise of office was made yet they failed to deliver. Who does that to fellow colleagues? Any one who treats them as toys will surely go back to square one by loosing his next election. This is why I want to advise that the nawojians are given a temporary office space with a toilet they can repair and use until that woman is thrown out of their rightful place where they will equally be given competition so that they do not relapse in the type of food they serve to us in their office/restaurant. We need nothing less than ten assorted food outlets in our centre. Not the monopolistic restrictions which that woman is enjoying  as a result of dangerous manipulations from her. She can easily poison our members in one swoop if we do not bring in new vendors quickly before the year runs out. I don’t think we need to consult a nutritionist on how to go about it. Set up the press centre committee immediately comrades and let us reel out modalities to them. The Exco can then be able to see the mistakes of the committee if any. Their fundamental business would be generate more funds and report to congress on how much progress they have been making in bringing money.

Advise to the new executive

Comrades now that you have been sworn in, always remember that in this life, we cannot talk about wisdom without “knowledge” . You actually need knowledge of the profession to acquire wisdom. This is because wisdom is the principal ingredient you need to acquire knowledge.  It was because Solomon had robust knowledge about the God he was dealing with as a king that he quickly requested for wisdom when asked what he prefers as a gift from his creator. He actually choose wisdom instead of material things because he knew that wisdom should generate material things. Today there is no creed in the world that doesn’t know the story of Solomon the great King who walked the face of this Earth as enshrined in the Bible. Suleiman ended having both before leaving this world back to his Creator as alluded to by the Koran. That is my prayers for Comrade Dauda Ilya and his entire team. You will overflow with wisdom. And God will surely guide you on how to fix immediate needs of the council so that we can enjoy your first congress meeting before Christmas.

Exhausting the grace of the first 100days

There is no law that says the new executive must deliver something within the first 100 days. And this is about three months plus but with what happened to the last executive, nobody will tell them to hurry up. Some of us who have been special advisers of the NUJ at large just believe that you cannot as an Exco be able to make impact without taking care of the first things first within the first remarkable 100 days in the history of this centre. Some of the things you must fix within the first 100 days should be  security and welfare. 

Comrades the security arrangements of our press centre has been in a real mess. In spite of the raging insurgency, any Toyin, Dikko and Modu just comes into the place without checks. This is the height of wrongs we have tolerated for the last decade of Boko Haram. If we are not careful some renegade gunmen not related to Shekau or Mohammed Yusuf can walk into the administrative section and shoot our officials with a silencer pistol and walk back without no one knowing. This is worse than keeping a bed within the administrative place to service the concubines of previous Exco members. 

We are Primus inter Paris when it comes to the usage of even the toilets. None members no matter how beautiful should not be allowed to use our facilities without scrutiny. Even parties must be restricted only to a select group of people. When a non member pays 50,000 to use the lawn then he will be careful about the crowd that would be invited.

Last week Friday, I walked into the centre to eat the only health snap I am permitted to eat at the “akara”  joint of Comrade Sunday only to be encountered by a large crowd at the entrance. After eating my akara dinner, I tried to talk to the hangers on to leave the entrance which could not happen at any other centre but they looked at me like an irritant. That could only happen because there was no security to send them away.  We need a security architecture in our centre badly. It’s not a public place for all. It’s for us journalists. Can something be going on in the bar centre and urchins will just gather like that? How many journalists can even enter the resting place of the MDCAN or residency launge in UMTH and relax without them asking if they can help you? It doesn’t happen in any place I have visited except Maiduguri and someone will say it’s because of insurgency. Why did insurgency not stop some officials from selling our land worth N14 million and squandering same while one of them held up the keys to the only temporary office space for other Exco members including nawojians and used it for his guest house. This will surely be a topic for the future because a bed has no business in that administrative place when the secretary, treasurer or vice chair do not  have offices which they really deserve to have quiet time to work for us.

I don’t think we need an urgent congress for an instant arrangement to be made for at least 2 security guards to take care of the press centre to start working immediately. One should be assigned the duty of manning the front gate during the day while others should take charge at night. This is one action that must take place before chairman Dauda ilya clicks 100 days in office. While I wait for secretary Chiroma to get my identity card from Abuja, i would gladly show him that of my newspaper or that of the govt house if he demands. And I will be allowed in. There is no Crime in him asking members to show some identification when in doubt. But as time goes on,both the night and day guards will be needing our support in making the place a safe one. 

A stitch in time saves nine. In as much as we don’t want our friends in the police or civil defense to send people there which they will gladly do for free, we should be able to organize ourselves and get “organized security”  for ourselves.  We must hit the ground running comrades.

Building Unity, Character and strength in the Borno council after the election, series…….1

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Columns

VP Kashim Shettima: Fate, Faith, and Lessons (1) 

Published

on

VP Kashim Shettima

VP Kashim Shettima: Fate, Faith, and Lessons (1) 

By: Dr. James Bwala

Vice President Kashim Shettima’s political trajectory is emblematic of the intricate interplay between fate, faith, and the lessons derived from Nigeria’s fraught political landscape. His ascent to the vice presidency amid a controversial Muslim-Muslim ticket underscores the delicate balance he must maintain in a deeply religious and ethnically diverse nation. This position has thrust him into debates about inclusivity and representation, compelling him to advocate for equitable power-sharing despite prevailing sectarian tensions.

Shettima’s public endorsement of a Southern Christian Senate President, even at the expense of perceived meritocracy, reflects his commitment to national unity over narrow religious or regional interests. Such gestures reveal an understanding that faith should foster cohesion rather than division—a lesson critical in Nigeria’s volatile sociopolitical climate. However, this idealism exists against a backdrop where governance often appears disengaged from citizens’ urgent needs. This disconnect between leadership and citizenry challenges Shettima to bridge the gap, urging him to align his actions with the foundational values of empathy and accountability that can steer Nigeria towards a more inclusive future.

Ultimately, Shettima’s experience illustrates how personal conviction and political pragmatism coalesce within leadership roles constrained by structural violence and historical grievances. His journey teaches that navigating Nigeria’s complexities demands not only strategic acumen but also an unwavering faith in dialogue and inclusivity as tools for lasting peace. In this context, Shettima’s leadership journey serves as a testament to the necessity of balancing personal beliefs with the broader imperative of fostering national unity. His efforts underscore a critical lesson: that sustainable governance in Nigeria hinges on leaders who prioritize collective well-being over entrenched divisions. His leadership demonstrates the critical importance of empathy and a genuine commitment to national progress in overcoming deep-seated challenges that threaten Nigeria’s stability. 

His ability to navigate these challenges with a focus on dialogue and inclusivity not only affirms his commitment to national progress but also exemplifies the potential for leadership that transcends personal and political divides. His leadership approach, characterized by a deliberate effort to embrace diversity and promote equitable representation, reflects an understanding that Nigeria’s future hinges on the strength of its unity. His vision for a unified Nigeria, though ambitious, is a necessary pursuit in a nation where historical divisions have too often been exploited for political gain. 

Shettima’s advocacy for equitable political representation, as evidenced by his controversial yet principled stance on promoting a Southern Christian Senate President to ensure balance and inclusivity, further illustrates his dedication to transcending religious and regional divides. This commitment to bridging divides is a testament to his belief in a Nigeria where leadership is defined by the ability to rise above entrenched sectarian loyalties and foster an environment of mutual respect and cooperation. Shettima’s approach is not merely theoretical; it is grounded in a pragmatic understanding of Nigeria’s complex political landscape and the pressing need for leaders who can navigate these intricacies with both wisdom and courage. 

The Vice President remained committed by prioritizing national unity and inclusivity, even when faced with potential backlash from entrenched interests. By demonstrating a willingness to engage with diverse communities and advocate for equitable representation, Shettima exemplifies how faith can be harnessed as a unifying force rather than a divisive tool. By prioritizing a leadership style that embraces diversity, Shettima challenges the status quo and inspires hope for a political culture that values cooperation over conflict. 

This vision aligns with the notion that true leadership requires courage to enact meaningful change and a dedication to principles that transcend immediate political expediency. By fostering an inclusive political environment, Shettima not only highlights the potential for faith to act as a bridge across divides but also demonstrates an understanding that true progress in Nigeria hinges on leaders who are willing to prioritize long-term national stability over short-term political gains, a sentiment echoed by those who champion the need for leaders who embody both integrity and a vision for inclusive governance. 

READ ALSO: https://newsng.ng/national-orthopaedic-hospital-jalingo-gets-chief-medical-director/

Shettima’s approach to governance, marked by a deliberate effort to balance religious and regional representation, serves as a testament to his belief in the power of inclusive politics to foster national cohesion. By navigating the complex interplay of religion and politics with a focus on fairness and representation, Shettima underscores the potential for faith to facilitate dialogue and mutual respect among Nigeria’s diverse populace. Shettima’s efforts to promote inclusivity and balance in political appointments, as evidenced by his advocacy for a Southern Christian Senate President despite potential controversy, reflect his commitment to fostering national unity and countering religious bias. Shettima’s vision for governance, therefore, emphasizes the importance of transcending religious and regional biases to create a political landscape where diverse voices contribute to national development. 

His advocacy for equitable representation is a pragmatic approach to addressing the historical imbalances that have often fueled distrust and division among Nigeria’s ethnic and religious groups. His leadership philosophy, thus, not only challenges the status quo but also aims to redefine the political narrative by fostering an environment where every Nigerian feels represented and valued. Shettima’s leadership, therefore, becomes a beacon of hope in a political landscape often marred by division and distrust. 

In this context, Shettima’s leadership is not only a reflection of his personal beliefs but also a strategic response to the broader challenges of religious bigotry and political imbalance in Nigeria. His approach, as observed in his recent initiatives, is a testament to his belief that sustainable progress can only be achieved through genuine collaboration and understanding among Nigeria’s multifaceted communities. Shettima’s endeavors, as highlighted by his leadership style, underscore a profound understanding that true progress in Nigeria is contingent upon dismantling the barriers of division and fostering a culture of cooperation and mutual respect among its citizens. His advocacy of balanced initiatives has sparked significant discussion, illustrating his willingness to prioritize national unity over parochial interests.

Shettima’s efforts to promote inclusivity and balance in political representation highlight his commitment to addressing the deep-seated issues of religious and ethnic division, demonstrating a leadership style that prioritizes unity over divisiveness. Shettima’s vision for a more cohesive Nigeria is not without its challenges, yet it reflects a strategic foresight that prioritizes long-term stability over short-term gains. His dedication to fostering a more inclusive political landscape is further reinforced by his efforts to engage with leaders across different regions and religious affiliations, promoting dialogue as a means to bridge the gaps that have long hindered national cohesion. 

His actions resonate with a broader vision for a united Nigeria, where diversity is celebrated as a strength rather than perceived as an obstacle to progress. His approach, rooted in both fate and faith, suggests that leadership can transcend entrenched divisions by embracing a broader vision of national identity that is inclusive and equitable for all citizens. 

* James Bwala, PhD, writes from Abuja.

VP Kashim Shettima: Fate, Faith, and Lessons (1) 

Continue Reading

Columns

2027: SDP, El-Rufai, and the refuge of lies

Published

on

2027: SDP, El-Rufai, and the refuge of lies

2027: SDP, El-Rufai, and the refuge of lies

By Dr. James Bwala

Governor Uba Sani of Kaduna state and the former senator representing Kaduna Central, Senator Shehu Sani, have severally revealed in their various commentaries and interviews with journalists the kind of person the former governor of Kaduna state, Malam Nasir El-Rufai, is and what he represents within and outside the political circles. Many who had also come across such pieces of writing or articles written about the former Kaduna state governor, Malam Nasir El-Rufai, have either aired their sentiments or held their reservations about the person of El-Rufai. Those of us who were born and brought up in Kaduna State can agree or disagree with Governor Uba Sani and Senator Shehu Sani on their conclusion of the person of El-Rufai. But certainly, one thing we may all agree on is better put in the words of Nigeria’s former head of state and president, Olusegun Obasanjo, when he described the Man-El-Rufai in his book, “My Watch,” Vol. 2, pages 110-112.  “El-Rufai has a penchant for lying, disloyalty..’.

The political landscape of Nigeria in 2027 presents a complex narrative of opportunism and strategic repositioning, epitomized by Nasir el-Rufai’s calculated maneuvers within the Social Democratic Party (SDP). El-Rufai’s persistent party-hopping demonstrates the pragmatic nature of Nigerian political elites, who prioritize personal interests over substantive national transformation. This phenomenon reveals a systemic problem where political leaders view party affiliations as tactical instruments rather than platforms for genuine societal progress. The strategically orchestrated political realignments, particularly el-Rufai’s mobilization of opposition leaders under the SDP banner, underscore a deeper malaise in Nigerian democratic practice. His attempts to reconstruct political narratives reflect a calculated approach to maintaining relevance in an increasingly volatile political environment. The persistent manipulation of electoral dynamics suggests a continued reliance on rhetorical strategies designed to obscure fundamental governance challenges.

In 2027, the political landscape in Nigeria continues to be shaped by complex dynamics involving several players, notably the Social Democratic Party (SDP) and prominent figures like Nasir El-Rufai.  This piece explores the intersection of political strategies, governance, and the pervasive influence of misinformation, encapsulated in the idea of a “refuge of lies.” The SDP has historically positioned itself as a party dedicated to social justice, democracy, and economic advancement. However, as 2027 unfolds, it faces significant challenges that threaten its credibility and electoral viability. One critical issue is the party’s struggle to maintain a clear and honest narrative amid a climate of misinformation. 

In recent years, the proliferation of social media has allowed for rapid dissemination of both information and falsehoods, leading to confusion among voters. The SDP must navigate this reality by championing transparency and engaging with citizens on the ground to rebuild trust. Nasir El-Rufai, the former governor of Kaduna State, also plays a pivotal role in this narrative. Known for his controversial approaches to governance, El-Rufai’s political maneuvers often stir debate. His strategies, ranging from economic reforms to security initiatives, highlight the necessity of truthful discourse in politics.

In a political climate where misinformation can skew public perception, El-Rufai’s successes and failures must be viewed through a lens of honesty. The SDP could benefit by aligning its objectives with truthfulness, demonstrating how effective governance relies on accurate and factual communication. The “refuge of lies” refers to the tendency of some political actors to resort to deceitful tactics to gain an advantage. This can involve making exaggerated claims about achievements or downplaying failures to manipulate public opinion. This practice erodes the foundation of democracy, as voters are left with distorted views of their leaders and their policies. 

Throughout 2027, as both the SDP and El-Rufai navigate their agendas, it is crucial to foster an environment where integrity prevails over deception. Voter education campaigns that promote critical thinking and fact-checking can combat the effects of misinformation. Indeed, the interplay between the SDP, Nasir El-Rufai, and the concept of the “refuge of lies” presents a critical moment for Nigeria’s political future. It emphasizes the importance of truthfulness in governance and the need for political accountability. As the country approaches the next electoral cycle, the challenges posed by misinformation demand urgent action. A commitment to transparency and integrity from both the SDP and political leaders like El-Rufai can foster a healthier democratic process, ultimately benefiting the electorate and the nation as a whole.

Ultimately, the 2027 political landscape for the SDP and its co-travellers under the umbrella called “A Coalition” represents a refuge of lies, where political survival trumps meaningful democratic engagement. El-Rufai’s maneuvers exemplify a broader pattern of political opportunism that undermines the potential for substantive national renewal. As Nigerian voters navigate these complex political terrains, the imperative for critical engagement and systemic accountability becomes increasingly paramount. Voters are left to discern between the rhetoric of change and the reality of recycled political tactics. The electorate’s skepticism is further fueled by a political climate where promises of reform are frequently overshadowed by entrenched interests and the perpetuation of power dynamics that favor the political elite over ordinary citizens. The entrenched cycle of political defections and alliances, as evidenced by El-Rufai’s maneuvers, highlights a stark reality where the pursuit of power supersedes the commitment to national development. 

This pattern of political maneuvering not only perpetuates a cycle of disillusionment among the electorate but also poses significant challenges to fostering a stable and transparent democratic process. The electorate’s growing disillusionment is exacerbated by political figures like El-Rufai, whose repeated party affiliations underscore a tactical play for power rather than a commitment to transformative leadership. The electorate’s skepticism is further fueled by a political climate where promises of reform are frequently overshadowed by entrenched interests and the perpetuation of power dynamics that favor the political elite over ordinary citizens. Such political maneuvering not only undermines the electorate’s trust but also perpetuates a cycle where substantial policy reform remains elusive. The strategic alignment of political figures with parties like the SDP, as advocated by El-Rufai, underscores a pervasive trend where political survival is prioritized over authentic governance reforms. Such a focus on political expediency rather than genuine reform efforts raises critical questions about the future of democracy in Nigeria and whether the electorate will continue to tolerate this cyclical betrayal.

The electorate’s growing disillusionment with these political machinations may eventually catalyze a demand for transparency and accountability, challenging leaders like El-Rufai to move beyond rhetoric and deliver tangible reforms. Given the electorate’s increasing frustration, it becomes imperative for political leaders to demonstrate a commitment to substantive policy changes rather than mere political posturing. The electorate’s demand for accountability is not only a call for action but also a test of the political will to transcend entrenched interests and foster genuine progress. The Social Democratic Party (SDP) must navigate these turbulent waters carefully, as its credibility hinges on distancing itself from the pervasive culture of political expediency that has long plagued the nation’s governance. 
READ ALSO: https://newsng.ng/southeast-crises-ipob-peddling-falsehood-disinformation-to-remain-relevant-army/

As the 2027 elections approach, the SDP’s challenge lies in convincing an increasingly skeptical public that it can break away from the entrenched practices of its predecessors and offer a viable alternative to the status quo. The party’s ability to present a cohesive and transparent platform will be crucial in dispelling the pervasive cynicism that has long characterized Nigerian politics. The party’s leadership must recognize that empty promises and shifting allegiances, as exemplified by political figures like El-Rufai, are no longer sufficient to secure the trust of a populace weary of recycled rhetoric and superficial alliances. The electorate’s skepticism is further fueled by figures like El-Rufai, whose frequent party shifts are seen as emblematic of political opportunism rather than a genuine commitment to reform. 

The challenge for the SDP will be to distinguish itself from figures like El-Rufai, whose political maneuvers have often been perceived as prioritizing self-interest over meaningful reform. To truly resonate with the electorate, the SDP must present a clear and consistent vision that starkly contrasts with the opportunistic tendencies of career politicians like El-Rufai. The SDP must focus on articulating policies that address the systemic issues of governance, resource mismanagement, and public disenchantment, rather than succumbing to the allure of temporary palliatives that have historically characterized political campaigns. The SDP’s commitment to integrity and reform will be tested as it navigates the complex landscape of Nigerian politics, where promises are often made with little intention of being fulfilled. The SDP must also remain vigilant against the allure of figures whose past actions, such as those of El-Rufai, have often contributed to the perpetuation of a political culture rooted in cynicism and self-preservation.  The SDP’s ability to build trust will hinge on its willingness to break away from the shadow of political figures like El-Rufai, whose influence often symbolizes a return to the entrenched power dynamics that many voters are eager to dismantle.

* James Bwala, PhD, writes from Abuja.

2027: SDP, El-Rufai, and the refuge of lies

Continue Reading

Columns

NNPCL Appointments: Ahmadu Musa Kida, Sahara Reporters, and Journalism Without Ethics

Published

on

Ahmadu Musa Kiɗa

NNPCL Appointments: Ahmadu Musa Kida, Sahara Reporters, and Journalism Without Ethics

By: Dr. James Bwala

The discourse surrounding Ahmadu Musa Kida and Sahara Reporters raises critical questions about the ethical standards in contemporary journalism. Kida, as a prominent figure in Nigerian sports administration, has become embroiled in controversies that reflect broader issues within the media landscape. Sahara Reporters, known for its investigative journalism, often blurs the lines between reporting and sensationalism, which can undermine public trust. This critique explores how such practices may detract from the credibility of journalism as a whole.

One significant concern is the potential for misinformation when journalistic integrity is compromised. The sensationalist approach taken by some media outlets can lead to distorted representations of events or individuals, particularly in politically charged environments. This tendency not only affects the subjects of news stories but also shapes public perception and discourse. In this context, Kida’s experiences serve as a case study of how personal narratives are manipulated for broader agendas.

Moreover, ethical journalism necessitates accountability and transparency—principles that seem increasingly neglected by platforms like Sahara Reporters. The lack of rigorous fact-checking and adherence to ethical standards can result in harmful repercussions for individuals involved. As such, it is imperative for journalists to uphold their responsibilities not only to inform but also to respect the dignity of all parties involved in their stories.

The assertion by Saharareporters that Ahmadu Musa Kida will compromise Nigerian interests is a glaring example of unethical journalism. This claim not only lacks substantiation but also undermines the principles of responsible reporting. Ethical journalism, as outlined in various studies, emphasizes the necessity for accuracy and fairness. By making sweeping accusations without credible evidence, Saharareporters fails to uphold these standards and instead engages in sensationalism that could potentially harm Kida’s reputation and the broader Nigerian context.

Moreover, the ethical dilemmas faced by journalists in Nigeria are well documented, underscoring the challenges of maintaining integrity within a politically charged environment. The media’s role should be to inform rather than to defame; therefore, such reckless claims reflect a significant deviation from journalistic ethics. The consequences of this behavior can be profound, contributing to public distrust in media institutions and exacerbating existing societal tensions. 

READ ALSO: https://newsng.ng/tinubushettima-the-epidemic-of-economic-insecurity-in-nigeria/

Ultimately, it is imperative for media outlets like Sahara Reporters to adhere strictly to ethical guidelines. Responsible journalism requires rigorous fact-checking and an understanding of the complexities surrounding individuals like Ahmadu Musa Kida. Failing to do so not only tarnishes their credibility but also poses risks to national cohesion and integrity (Hile, 2024). Thus, it is essential for journalists in Nigeria to navigate their responsibilities with care and accountability.

The report by Sahara Reporters is indeed very sad for every practicing journalist who understands “MORALITY” in framing issues to influence public perception. It is only in Nigeria that one can go into media and start writing unsubstantiated news about the person they virtually know nothing about. 

Journalism, like any profession, is guided by ethics, which enjoin journalists to undertake investigations before writing about any personality. That was not the case when Sahara Reporters came up with their reportage about the appointment of Ahmadu Musa Kida as non-executive chairman of NNPC Limited. 

I need not say much about the person of Ahmadu Musa Kida here, but many Nigerians who came across him will agree that this personality without mincing words is the best thing that happened to the Tinubu administration in terms of appointments. His records at Total Oil speak volumes and are available for serious journalism research. His accelerated growth and rise to deputy managing director. A growth not due to Godfatherism but due to the highest degree of professionalism, owing to his result orientation and the value addition he put to bear in his capacity as their managing director, is straight for any debate. 

This is a hard-earned achievement, not through bootlicking or lobbying. He retired after thirty-five (35) years of meritorious service, but the organization had to retain him as a non-executive director. All these achievements were due to his hard work, dedication, honesty, and selfless service. 

To Nigeria Basketball, one need not be told of his landmark achievements from nowhere in the map of basketball. The Nigerian team (both men and women) started to exhibit brilliant performance. Nigeria became the first country to beat the USA on their home turf, which is highly unprecedented. At the Australia Olympics, America narrowly escaped humiliation on a global stage by Nigeria; this result was the encouragement, funding, and dedication of Ahmadu Musa Kida and his team. He remains a very good team player, an expert in the oil and gas sector, and beyond that, a truly outstanding nationalist who will not compromise the national interest of his country at the expense of anybody. I have known Ahmadu Musa Kida for several years, and I can attest to his patriotism, honesty, and dedication to duty in terms of taking all responsibility with the seriousness it deserves.

* James Bwala, PhD, writes from Abuja. 

NNPCL Appointments: Ahmadu Musa Kida, Sahara Reporters, and Journalism Without Ethics

Continue Reading

Trending

Verified by MonsterInsights