National News
Lawmakers at ECOWAS Parliament Still in Fight Over Employment of Staff
Lawmakers at ECOWAS Parliament Still in Fight Over Employment of Staff
By Michael Mike
The controversy surrounding the recent employment by the Economic Committee of West African States (ECOWAS) is not over yet as lawmakers at it’s parliament have rejected a motion to present the outcome of the Ad-hoc committee setup to review allegations of nepotism in the exercise.
The lawmakers registered their protestation against the committee headed by Nigerian Senator Ali Ndume, at the plenary session of the 2nd Ordinary Session of the ECOWAS Parliament, in Lome, Togo while alleging that the Speaker of Parliament, Sidie Mohamed Tunis constituted the review committee without recourse to parliament.
The lawmakers noted that it was against the rules of parliament for the recruitment exercise to have gone ahead after it was voted to be suspended in the last parliamentary session when allegations of favouritism were raised.
Hon Awaji-Inombek Abiante who moved a point of order said that the report of the Ad-hoc Committee as set up by the Bureau was given the mandate to work without recourse to its adoption by the Plenary as such was illegal in its entirety.
This position was supported by Nigeria’s Senator Smart Adeyemi, who drew the Speaker’s attention to the adverse implication of the exercise.
Adeyemi said, “when actions are taken that are not in conformity with the spirit and the content of the documents that are supposed to guide us I think Mr. Speaker let us accept that something was done wrong. We should be courageous to say that, but for you to say that you prefer the decision that was not in conformity with the law, as an infringement to the modalities of the Parliament, in fact, the contrary is the case, if we go ahead to accept what is not properly done then the integrity of Parliament itself will be questioned.
“It means that as we are here, somebody can take a decision on our behalf without consulting us. Mr. Speaker with due respect to your position, I personally like you, I respect you, but this decision is not in intent and spirit of the document before us.”
Another lawmaker, Hon. Samson Ahi from Ghana argued that the formation of the Ad-hoc Committee was against the rules of parliament.
He said. “I just want to find out from you Mr. Speaker, are you saying that with the consultation of the Bureau you constituted an Ad-hoc Committee and after that, you gave them a mandate to work without the approval of the entire house, is that what you are saying?
“My understanding is that you can constitute the committee, alright, but it is subject to the approval by the entire members before they can legally work. If you and your Bureau can constitute a committee and they start working without recourse to members before you present your report, then I think there is something wrong with what you have done.”
Also, Nigeria’s Hon. Abdullahi Kamba noted that the Bureau has no right or powers to take the decision and that they should have reverted back to Plenary to form an Ad-hoc committee.
He said: “Not them as the Bureau forming the Committee, it is wrong, and for that matter, I hope that whatever report the Ad-hoc committee has should not be read here, we should form the committee today so that they can start work.”
Responding to the backlash, the Chairman of the Ad-hoc Committee, Senator, Ali Ndume said “I am standing here because of the Ad-hoc committee that was formed and vested with powers to investigate on the matters raised by our high Commissioner from Nigeria and also the First Deputy Speaker on the purported irregularities in recruitment which was suspended.
“Our mandate as at that time and now did not lift the ban for the suspension that was the decision that was taken at the Plenary.
“On behalf of the other colleagues that undertook this Ad-hoc job, we didn’t look for the job. In fact in my own case I was in my local government because we were on recess and I was mourning my father; then the Speaker called me to say that there is an issue that came up that is eating the system which was true as at that time and that he needed some members as a committee to immediately look into the matter and report. “
He added that: “We have a mission but now I am embarrassed by the observation of abnormalities. I am not looking for this job and I am sure our other colleagues are not looking for this job. I am also sure that even if a new committee has to be formed it has to be members of this ECOWAS, and I don’t think they are looking for the job either and I don’t think any of us cannot do this job.
“I was thinking that members will hear me out or hear the committee or even adopt if there is abnormality because I know the situations where normally if the head of the institution takes a decision that decision is not questioned, but it looked into with the view of ratifying it.”
Ndume said: “Distinguish colleagues, I don’t want it to put my personal interest but because of the interest of the workers, if not I will not present the report, I will not continue with illegality, you have to decide.”
The Speaker of Parliament, Tunis moved that the recruitment process be suspended indefinitely, a decision which seems to have infuriated Senator Edwin Snowe from Liberia who walked out of the plenary in protest of the deferment.
Shortly after the session, at a press conference, the Speaker of ECOWAS parliament accused lawmakers in the parliament of mischief and a deliberate misrepresentation of facts in order to garner the sympathy of constituents.
He said: “You will recall that in the last session in Abuja, Honourable Members raised the issue of recruitment in the ECOWAS Parliament, in fact the impression at that time was that there were a lot of malpractices regarding the recruitment exercises.
“When I got the information, I decided to set up an independent Ad-hoc Committee, headed by a very senior senator from Nigeria, Ali Ndume, to look at the whole situation and to determine whether in fact Nigerians were marginalized, and whether the process was transparent in line with our Supplementary Act in the staff regulations, and any other issues that may arise from their investigations.”
“They submitted their report to me and I called a Bureau meeting. We looked at the report, we adopted it by law and based on the fact that the committee found out that there was nothing wrong in the recruitment exercises, we decided to go ahead to discuss it, to now consider the Advisory Committee Report. The Advisory Committee is provided for in our Staff Regulations, their responsibility is more or less to look at shortlisting and interviews for staff members. The composition of that particular committee is clearly indicated in our Staff Regulations and how to determine who will be a member is already stated in the Staff Regulations. So it’s just a question of looking at the positions, like if they said the Director of Finance is a member, you look at the Parliament who is the Director of Administration you put the person there. It’s all clear in the Staff Regulations.
“By law and in line with the Supplementary Act we have done our part, but of course because the issue of recruitment initially came up from the Plenary I decided that the Chairman should also report to the Plenary for information purposes only, because the Law does not in any way require Plenary to deal with recruitment issues.
“If you look at the recruitment issues, a reference is made to the head of the institution, which is me, I am the Speaker. I am wearing two hats, one as the Head of Institution and the other as Speaker. So as Head of Institutions I can take decisions with regards to that, but then, I can say because colleagues in the Plenary actually raised the issue I needed to be very clear in my mind and to the public, that in fact the process was transparent and it was all done in line with the Law.
“What I am about to tell you especially for our Colleagues in Nigeria, because this is were there was a huge publicity about malpractices in the ECOWAS Parliament, I want the public to know that the Senator Ali Ndume report which will be given to you clearly exonerated the Parliament that from G to P4 Recruitment as ongoing at the ECOWAS Parliament is transparent and in line with the Staff Regulations and the Supplementary Act, that is very important I want the public especially our Nigerian Public to know, that there we no malpractices. Number two, that Nigerians were not marginalized at all in the whole process.
“As a matter of fact, out of ten positions from the report now that has been submitted to us by the Advisory Committee, 5 of them went to Nigeria, 1 to Sierra Leone, 1 to Senegal, 1 to Guinea Bissau, 1 to Niger and 1 to Ghana, and it also important and very important to inform the general public that 70% of this new recruitment came from the internal staff, that means people who have already been serving the ECOWAS Parliament,” the Speaker explained.
The speaker equally alleged that another reason for the row in parliament was because lawmakers are protesting a new administrative rule that takes away the prerogative to buy air tickets from lawmakers themselves and vested it in administration.
He noted that: “When I came to Parliament in 2018, we used to buy our own tickets then the Parliament would refund. They gave us a threshold for a return ticket, then in 2019, that is before I took over as Speaker, that changed completely because of an audit report which I don’t know the details of because by then I was not the Speaker.
“From then, tickets for MPs were not going to be bought by the MPs. When I took over in 2020 that’s what I inherited, but then in the last two years I have been Speaker there has always been agitations from Honourable Members that we should go back to what was obtained in 2018, or before I joined Parliament that MPs should be buying their own tickets.
“I have been resisting it for some time and resisting because I am one person that always believes in what the rule says.
“The reason why I had decided to encourage the idea of MPs buying their own tickets is because I looked at the budget circular, but then from the figures I saw the Parliament was spending more on tickets for MPs, and we were talking about cutting down cost.
“It will only be proper for me to toe the line of MPs for me to say let us try again this idea of buying our own tickets and see what will come out of it. But I must make it very clear, these are not just proposals, the law as it stands right now, is that Parliament was supposed to buy it.
Lawmakers at ECOWAS Parliament Still in Fight Over Employment of Staff
National News
From Ports to Food: How Partnership with China is Driving Nigeria’s Economic Transformation
From Ports to Food: How Partnership with China is Driving Nigeria’s Economic Transformation
By: Adeola Adelabu
For years, Nigeria’s conversations around economic transformation have been long on ambition but short on execution. Increasingly, however, a more pragmatic pattern is emerging, one defined by structured partnerships, targeted investments, and a growing emphasis on delivery. Nowhere is this shift more visible than in the evolving relationship between Nigeria and China.
As bilateral cooperation deepens, a broad portfolio of projects spanning infrastructure, manufacturing, and agriculture is beginning to reshape Nigeria’s economic trajectory. The emerging signal is clear: development is no longer being framed solely around policy intent, but around measurable outcomes.
A clear demonstration of this shift is the operational success of the Lekki Deep Sea Port. Developed in partnership with China Harbour Engineering Company (CHEC), the port stands as one of the most significant private-sector-led infrastructure investments in Nigeria in recent years. With over $1 billion in equity contribution by CHEC, the facility is now fully operational, easing port congestion, improving cargo handling efficiency, and strengthening Nigeria’s position as a maritime gateway for West Africa.
Beyond its infrastructure value, Lekki Deep Sea Port is increasingly seen as a case study in what structured international partnerships can deliver when aligned with domestic priorities. It highlights a key lesson: investment alone is not sufficient; execution, governance, and operational sustainability are what convert capital into national value.
However, infrastructure is only the starting point of industrial transformation. The next frontier lies in rebuilding Nigeria’s productive base, particularly in steel. No modern economy achieves industrial depth without a functioning steel industry, and this reality places renewed attention on the revival of the Ajaokuta Steel Company.
For decades, Ajaokuta has remained an unfulfilled potential. Yet, renewed collaboration involving Chinese technical and investment partners has reopened the possibility of repositioning it as a core pillar of Nigeria’s industrial ecosystem. A functional steel plant would reduce import dependency, lower production costs across sectors, and stimulate downstream industries such as construction, fabrication, and manufacturing.
The strategic logic is further reinforced by Nigeria’s resource endowment, particularly iron ore deposits in Itakpe, Lokoja and Ogun state. Combined with improving logistics infrastructure, including rail and inland transport corridors, the fundamentals for a viable steel value chain are present. What remains critical is execution discipline and sustained policy continuity over time.
If infrastructure and steel represent the backbone of industrialisation, agriculture represents its most immediate and socially visible impact. In a context where food inflation continues to pressure household incomes, interventions that directly affect food supply and pricing carry both economic and political significance. This is where the National Integrated Poultry Project becomes particularly consequential.
According to Joseph Tegbe, the project is designed to address structural constraints in Nigeria’s poultry value chain, particularly high feed costs and supply inefficiencies. By integrating large-scale poultry production with domestic cultivation of key feed inputs such as maize and soybean, the initiative directly targets the most significant cost drivers in the sector.
The economic rationale is straightforward: reducing feed costs lowers production costs, and lower production costs improve affordability for consumers. In practical terms, this is expected to translate into more accessible prices for eggs and poultry products, which remain critical sources of affordable protein for millions of Nigerian households.
The implications extend beyond consumers to producers. Poultry farmers, many of whom operate under volatile input pricing and thin margins, stand to benefit from more stable feed supply chains and reduced production costs. This could enhance profitability, encourage sector expansion, and strengthen resilience across the agricultural value chain.
The scale of ambition is significant. Pilot phases are scheduled for Kaduna and Oyo States, with plans for national expansion thereafter. Each integrated facility is expected to operate at industrial scale, housing up over one million layer birds alongside substantial broiler capacity, and collectively producing millions of eggs daily.
The programme is projected to generate tens of thousands of direct jobs and hundreds of thousands of indirect opportunities across farming, logistics, processing, and distribution.
Yet, Nigeria’s development history underscores an important caution: ambition does not automatically translate into impact. The country has seen several large-scale agricultural and industrial programmes falter due to weak coordination, inconsistent policy implementation, and limited accountability mechanisms.
This makes execution the defining variable. Clear timelines, institutional coordination, and measurable performance indicators will determine whether these initiatives become transformational or remain under-realised potential.
Encouragingly, recent engagements under the Nigeria–China Strategic Partnership indicate that over $20 billion in investment commitments have been mobilised across agriculture, mining, automotive manufacturing, and energy.
While this signals strong investor confidence, commitments must ultimately be judged by outcomes, jobs created, food prices reduced, industries strengthened, and productivity improved.
Taken together, the trajectory from Lekki Deep Sea Port to Ajaokuta Steel and the National Integrated Poultry Project reflects a more integrated approach to economic development, one that connects infrastructure, industry, and food systems within a single framework of cooperation. The Nigeria–China partnership is therefore evolving beyond diplomacy into an economic delivery platform. The real question is no longer about the scale of ambition, but the consistency of execution.
If Nigeria succeeds, the impact will be tangible: lower food costs, stronger industrial capacity, and expanded employment opportunities. If it fails, these initiatives risk joining a long list of unrealised development plans. Ultimately, the difference will be defined not by vision, but by execution.
Adeola Adelabu is the Lead, Media and Public Relations at the Nigeria–China Strategic Partnership (NCSP).
From Ports to Food: How Partnership with China is Driving Nigeria’s Economic Transformation
National News
Nigeria Launches Nationwide Drive to Safely Manage Small Battery Waste
Nigeria Launches Nationwide Drive to Safely Manage Small Battery Waste
By: Michael Mike
Nigeria has taken a major step toward tackling a fast-growing but often overlooked environmental threat with the launch of a national initiative to ensure the safe collection and recycling of small-sized waste batteries.
Unveiled at the Federal Ministry of Environment’s Green Building in Abuja, the programme introduces a structured system for the environmentally sound management of discarded household batteries—ranging from button cells in wristwatches to AA and AAA batteries in remote controls, as well as lithium-ion units powering mobile phones and other portable devices.
Speaking at the event, Minister of Environment, Balarabe Lawal, described the initiative as a decisive intervention to close a long-standing gap in Nigeria’s waste management system.
He noted that while large batteries such as those used in vehicles often attract recycling value, smaller batteries are routinely ignored and improperly disposed of, posing serious risks to both human health and the environment.

“These small-sized batteries are deceptively dangerous,” the minister said. “They are easily discarded, yet they contain toxic substances that can contaminate our soil, water, and food systems. This initiative is about protecting lives—especially those of women and children who are most vulnerable to the impacts of environmental pollution.”
At the core of the programme is the deployment of specially designed collection receptacles across strategic locations in the Federal Capital Territory, including markets, schools, offices, and motor parks. The goal is to make safe disposal accessible at the point of use, ensuring that hazardous battery waste does not end up in dumpsites or informal recycling channels.
The initiative is being implemented in partnership with the Alliance for Responsible Battery Recycling (ARBR), the Producer Responsibility Organisation for Nigeria’s battery sector under the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) framework.
Established in 2019, ARBR is tasked with coordinating the collection, transportation, and environmentally compliant recycling of battery waste nationwide.
Providing an overview of the project, ARBR representatives highlighted the growing volume of small battery waste driven by increased technology use and energy access across Nigeria. Despite their widespread use, these batteries often enter general waste streams at the end of their lifecycle, releasing hazardous materials such as cadmium, mercury, nickel, lithium, and lead into the environment.

“Collection is the foundation of environmentally sound management,” ARBR stated. “Without it, the entire value chain—from transportation and storage to treatment and recycling—breaks down. This project is designed to ensure that these batteries are captured early and directed into safe, regulated systems.”
Beyond collection, the programme establishes a coordinated downstream process involving the evacuation of collected batteries to central aggregation hubs, from where they will be transported to licensed recycling facilities, including export where necessary under national regulations. Key partners, including the Abuja Environmental Protection Board (AEPB) and the Waste Pickers Association of Nigeria (WAPAN), are expected to play critical roles in ensuring the system’s efficiency and sustainability.
The initiative is anchored on Nigeria’s National Policy on Battery Waste Management (2022) and the National Environmental (Battery Control) Regulations (2024), which mandate the responsible lifecycle management of batteries in line with global environmental standards.
In a goodwill message, the Director General of the National Environmental Standards and Regulations Enforcement Agency (NESREA), Prof. Innocent Barikor, described the launch as a strong demonstration of Nigeria’s commitment to meeting its obligations under international environmental agreements, including the Basel Convention on hazardous waste.
He emphasized that the rapid proliferation of battery-powered devices has created an escalating waste stream that demands urgent and coordinated regulatory action.
“This is not just a technical exercise,” Barikor said. “It is a declaration of intent that Nigeria is ready to protect public health and preserve its ecosystems through science-based and enforceable solutions.”
He further noted that the initiative builds on groundwork laid under the PROBAMET project, which helped map informal sector activities, identify infrastructure gaps, and raise awareness among stakeholders in the battery value chain.
Stakeholders at the event commended the Federal Ministry of Environment for its leadership, while also acknowledging the role of international development partners in providing technical and financial support for the project.
Experts say the initiative could also unlock economic opportunities by integrating informal waste collectors into formal systems and advancing Nigeria’s circular economy agenda—where waste is treated as a resource rather than a burden.
As the programme rolls out, officials are calling on Nigerians to adopt responsible disposal habits, stressing that the success of the initiative depends not only on infrastructure but also on public participation.
“Every battery properly disposed of is a life protected and an ecosystem preserved,” the minister said. “This is the beginning of a nationwide movement toward cleaner, safer environmental practices.”
The launch marks what stakeholders describe as a critical turning point in Nigeria’s approach to hazardous waste management, with expectations that the model could be expanded beyond the Federal Capital Territory to other parts of the country in the near future.
Nigeria Launches Nationwide Drive to Safely Manage Small Battery Waste
National News
US. Embassy Abuja Seals Landmark Tech Partnership with Ilorin Innovation Hub
US. Embassy Abuja Seals Landmark Tech Partnership with Ilorin Innovation Hub
By: Michael Mike
The U.S. Embassy Abuja has signed a three-year Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Ilorin Innovation Hub, launching its first public-private partnership outside the American Spaces Network and signaling a strategic expansion of U.S. engagement in Nigeria’s fast-growing technology ecosystem.
The agreement, formalized at a ceremony in Abuja, is set to deepen collaboration in artificial intelligence (AI), science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), as well as professional development, particularly targeting young innovators and tech professionals in Kwara State.

Speaking at the event, U.S. Embassy Public Diplomacy Counselor Lee McManis described the partnership as a significant step toward strengthening innovation-led economic ties between Nigeria and the United States. He noted that Kwara is steadily emerging as a technology hub, attracting growing interest from American companies eager to invest, compete, and collaborate within the region’s evolving digital economy.
Under the terms of the MOU, both parties will roll out a series of programs showcasing American leadership in technology and innovation. These initiatives will include business English training, STEM-focused education, and capacity-building workshops designed to align Nigerian talent with the demands of U.S. industries.
The partnership is also expected to create new pathways for knowledge exchange, entrepreneurship, and workforce development, reinforcing broader efforts to position Nigeria as a competitive player in the global tech landscape.
Officials say the initiative reflects a shared vision centered on innovation, education, and opportunity as drivers of sustainable economic growth. The collaboration is poised to not only empower local talent but also strengthen bilateral relations through practical, skills-based engagement.
With this move, the U.S. Embassy is extending its footprint beyond traditional platforms, embracing targeted partnerships that directly impact emerging innovation ecosystems across Nigeria.
US. Embassy Abuja Seals Landmark Tech Partnership with Ilorin Innovation Hub
-
News2 years agoRoger Federer’s Shock as DNA Results Reveal Myla and Charlene Are Not His Biological Children
-
Opinions4 years agoTHE PLIGHT OF FARIDA
-
News1 year agoFAILED COUP IN BURKINA FASO: HOW TRAORÉ NARROWLY ESCAPED ASSASSINATION PLOT AMID FOREIGN INTERFERENCE CLAIMS
-
News2 years agoEYN: Rev. Billi, Distortion of History, and The Living Tamarind Tree
-
Opinions4 years agoPOLICE CHARGE ROOMS, A MINTING PRESS
-
ACADEMICS2 years agoA History of Biu” (2015) and The Lingering Bura-Pabir Question (1)
-
Columns2 years agoArmy University Biu: There is certain interest, but certainly not from Borno.
-
Opinions2 years agoTinubu,Shettima: The epidemic of economic, insecurity in Nigeria
