National News
Lawmakers at ECOWAS Parliament Still in Fight Over Employment of Staff
Lawmakers at ECOWAS Parliament Still in Fight Over Employment of Staff
By Michael Mike
The controversy surrounding the recent employment by the Economic Committee of West African States (ECOWAS) is not over yet as lawmakers at it’s parliament have rejected a motion to present the outcome of the Ad-hoc committee setup to review allegations of nepotism in the exercise.
The lawmakers registered their protestation against the committee headed by Nigerian Senator Ali Ndume, at the plenary session of the 2nd Ordinary Session of the ECOWAS Parliament, in Lome, Togo while alleging that the Speaker of Parliament, Sidie Mohamed Tunis constituted the review committee without recourse to parliament.
The lawmakers noted that it was against the rules of parliament for the recruitment exercise to have gone ahead after it was voted to be suspended in the last parliamentary session when allegations of favouritism were raised.
Hon Awaji-Inombek Abiante who moved a point of order said that the report of the Ad-hoc Committee as set up by the Bureau was given the mandate to work without recourse to its adoption by the Plenary as such was illegal in its entirety.
This position was supported by Nigeria’s Senator Smart Adeyemi, who drew the Speaker’s attention to the adverse implication of the exercise.
Adeyemi said, “when actions are taken that are not in conformity with the spirit and the content of the documents that are supposed to guide us I think Mr. Speaker let us accept that something was done wrong. We should be courageous to say that, but for you to say that you prefer the decision that was not in conformity with the law, as an infringement to the modalities of the Parliament, in fact, the contrary is the case, if we go ahead to accept what is not properly done then the integrity of Parliament itself will be questioned.
“It means that as we are here, somebody can take a decision on our behalf without consulting us. Mr. Speaker with due respect to your position, I personally like you, I respect you, but this decision is not in intent and spirit of the document before us.”
Another lawmaker, Hon. Samson Ahi from Ghana argued that the formation of the Ad-hoc Committee was against the rules of parliament.
He said. “I just want to find out from you Mr. Speaker, are you saying that with the consultation of the Bureau you constituted an Ad-hoc Committee and after that, you gave them a mandate to work without the approval of the entire house, is that what you are saying?
“My understanding is that you can constitute the committee, alright, but it is subject to the approval by the entire members before they can legally work. If you and your Bureau can constitute a committee and they start working without recourse to members before you present your report, then I think there is something wrong with what you have done.”
Also, Nigeria’s Hon. Abdullahi Kamba noted that the Bureau has no right or powers to take the decision and that they should have reverted back to Plenary to form an Ad-hoc committee.
He said: “Not them as the Bureau forming the Committee, it is wrong, and for that matter, I hope that whatever report the Ad-hoc committee has should not be read here, we should form the committee today so that they can start work.”
Responding to the backlash, the Chairman of the Ad-hoc Committee, Senator, Ali Ndume said “I am standing here because of the Ad-hoc committee that was formed and vested with powers to investigate on the matters raised by our high Commissioner from Nigeria and also the First Deputy Speaker on the purported irregularities in recruitment which was suspended.
“Our mandate as at that time and now did not lift the ban for the suspension that was the decision that was taken at the Plenary.
“On behalf of the other colleagues that undertook this Ad-hoc job, we didn’t look for the job. In fact in my own case I was in my local government because we were on recess and I was mourning my father; then the Speaker called me to say that there is an issue that came up that is eating the system which was true as at that time and that he needed some members as a committee to immediately look into the matter and report. “
He added that: “We have a mission but now I am embarrassed by the observation of abnormalities. I am not looking for this job and I am sure our other colleagues are not looking for this job. I am also sure that even if a new committee has to be formed it has to be members of this ECOWAS, and I don’t think they are looking for the job either and I don’t think any of us cannot do this job.
“I was thinking that members will hear me out or hear the committee or even adopt if there is abnormality because I know the situations where normally if the head of the institution takes a decision that decision is not questioned, but it looked into with the view of ratifying it.”
Ndume said: “Distinguish colleagues, I don’t want it to put my personal interest but because of the interest of the workers, if not I will not present the report, I will not continue with illegality, you have to decide.”
The Speaker of Parliament, Tunis moved that the recruitment process be suspended indefinitely, a decision which seems to have infuriated Senator Edwin Snowe from Liberia who walked out of the plenary in protest of the deferment.
Shortly after the session, at a press conference, the Speaker of ECOWAS parliament accused lawmakers in the parliament of mischief and a deliberate misrepresentation of facts in order to garner the sympathy of constituents.
He said: “You will recall that in the last session in Abuja, Honourable Members raised the issue of recruitment in the ECOWAS Parliament, in fact the impression at that time was that there were a lot of malpractices regarding the recruitment exercises.
“When I got the information, I decided to set up an independent Ad-hoc Committee, headed by a very senior senator from Nigeria, Ali Ndume, to look at the whole situation and to determine whether in fact Nigerians were marginalized, and whether the process was transparent in line with our Supplementary Act in the staff regulations, and any other issues that may arise from their investigations.”
“They submitted their report to me and I called a Bureau meeting. We looked at the report, we adopted it by law and based on the fact that the committee found out that there was nothing wrong in the recruitment exercises, we decided to go ahead to discuss it, to now consider the Advisory Committee Report. The Advisory Committee is provided for in our Staff Regulations, their responsibility is more or less to look at shortlisting and interviews for staff members. The composition of that particular committee is clearly indicated in our Staff Regulations and how to determine who will be a member is already stated in the Staff Regulations. So it’s just a question of looking at the positions, like if they said the Director of Finance is a member, you look at the Parliament who is the Director of Administration you put the person there. It’s all clear in the Staff Regulations.
“By law and in line with the Supplementary Act we have done our part, but of course because the issue of recruitment initially came up from the Plenary I decided that the Chairman should also report to the Plenary for information purposes only, because the Law does not in any way require Plenary to deal with recruitment issues.
“If you look at the recruitment issues, a reference is made to the head of the institution, which is me, I am the Speaker. I am wearing two hats, one as the Head of Institution and the other as Speaker. So as Head of Institutions I can take decisions with regards to that, but then, I can say because colleagues in the Plenary actually raised the issue I needed to be very clear in my mind and to the public, that in fact the process was transparent and it was all done in line with the Law.
“What I am about to tell you especially for our Colleagues in Nigeria, because this is were there was a huge publicity about malpractices in the ECOWAS Parliament, I want the public to know that the Senator Ali Ndume report which will be given to you clearly exonerated the Parliament that from G to P4 Recruitment as ongoing at the ECOWAS Parliament is transparent and in line with the Staff Regulations and the Supplementary Act, that is very important I want the public especially our Nigerian Public to know, that there we no malpractices. Number two, that Nigerians were not marginalized at all in the whole process.
“As a matter of fact, out of ten positions from the report now that has been submitted to us by the Advisory Committee, 5 of them went to Nigeria, 1 to Sierra Leone, 1 to Senegal, 1 to Guinea Bissau, 1 to Niger and 1 to Ghana, and it also important and very important to inform the general public that 70% of this new recruitment came from the internal staff, that means people who have already been serving the ECOWAS Parliament,” the Speaker explained.
The speaker equally alleged that another reason for the row in parliament was because lawmakers are protesting a new administrative rule that takes away the prerogative to buy air tickets from lawmakers themselves and vested it in administration.
He noted that: “When I came to Parliament in 2018, we used to buy our own tickets then the Parliament would refund. They gave us a threshold for a return ticket, then in 2019, that is before I took over as Speaker, that changed completely because of an audit report which I don’t know the details of because by then I was not the Speaker.
“From then, tickets for MPs were not going to be bought by the MPs. When I took over in 2020 that’s what I inherited, but then in the last two years I have been Speaker there has always been agitations from Honourable Members that we should go back to what was obtained in 2018, or before I joined Parliament that MPs should be buying their own tickets.
“I have been resisting it for some time and resisting because I am one person that always believes in what the rule says.
“The reason why I had decided to encourage the idea of MPs buying their own tickets is because I looked at the budget circular, but then from the figures I saw the Parliament was spending more on tickets for MPs, and we were talking about cutting down cost.
“It will only be proper for me to toe the line of MPs for me to say let us try again this idea of buying our own tickets and see what will come out of it. But I must make it very clear, these are not just proposals, the law as it stands right now, is that Parliament was supposed to buy it.
Lawmakers at ECOWAS Parliament Still in Fight Over Employment of Staff
National News
Civil Society Groups Slam Tinubu, National Assembly Over Budget Re-enactment, Demand Fiscal Transparency
Civil Society Groups Slam Tinubu, National Assembly Over Budget Re-enactment, Demand Fiscal Transparency
By: Michael Mike
A coalition of Nigerian civil society organisations has accused President Bola Tinubu and the National Assembly of breaching constitutional and fiscal laws through the repeal and re-enactment of the 2024 and 2025 Appropriation Acts, warning that the actions undermine transparency and democratic accountability.
In a statement issued in Abuja, under the platform Nigerian Economy Civil Society Action, the groups described the development as a dangerous abuse of fiscal process, alleging that billions of naira were spent without prior legislative approval.
The organisations expressed outrage that eighteen days after the presentation of the federal executive budget, neither the Budget Office of the Federation nor the National Assembly had made the budget documents publicly available. They said the absence of published budget details prevented citizens from scrutinising government spending and participating meaningfully in the budgeting process.
According to the groups, the situation was worsened by the repeal and re-enactment of the 2024 and 2025 Appropriation Acts without public hearings or access to the revised documents. They argued that the move violated constitutional provisions which require legislative approval before any public funds are expended.
The coalition noted that the 2024 Appropriation Act, which originally expired at the end of December 2024, was controversially extended by the National Assembly to mid-2025 and later to December 2025. They alleged that despite the extensions, the executive failed to implement the budget as approved before seeking to repeal and re-enact it with an increased expenditure figure, raising the total budget size from ₦35.05 trillion to ₦43.56 trillion.
Describing the process as unprecedented, the groups argued that increasing a budget after its lifespan had ended had no basis in Nigerian law. They maintained that the spending of additional public funds without prior authorisation amounted to a constitutional violation, noting that Nigeria was not operating under a declared fiscal emergency at the time.
On the 2025 budget, the organisations faulted the decision to revise expenditure figures at the end of the fiscal year rather than through a mid-year review, which they said is the globally accepted practice. They rejected claims by the National Assembly that the repeal and re-enactment were intended to align Nigeria’s budgeting process with international best practices.
The groups cited provisions of the Constitution and the Fiscal Responsibility Act which mandate transparency, legislative oversight, and public disclosure of government financial decisions. They said the continued refusal to publish budget documents violated these laws and eroded public trust.
As part of their demands, the civil society organisations called on the National Assembly to halt all unappropriated spending, warning that such actions could constitute grounds for impeachment. They also demanded a firm commitment from the President to comply strictly with constitutional spending limits.
The coalition further urged the immediate publication of the 2026 budget estimates and the re-enacted 2024 and 2025 Appropriation Acts on official government platforms, alongside renewed guarantees of citizen participation in fiscal decision-making.
The statement was jointly signed by the Centre for Social Justice, Africa Network for Environment and Economic Justice, Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre, BudgIT, PRIMORG, PLSI and other advocacy groups.
Civil Society Groups Slam Tinubu, National Assembly Over Budget Re-enactment, Demand Fiscal Transparency
National News
UN Urges Nigerian Authorities to Protect Civilians, Schools After Fresh Niger State Attacks
UN Urges Nigerian Authorities to Protect Civilians, Schools After Fresh Niger State Attacks
By: Michael Mike
The United Nations has called on Nigerian authorities to urgently strengthen the protection of civilians and educational institutions following a wave of violent attacks in Niger State and neighbouring areas that left dozens of people dead and many others abducted.
The UN Resident and Humanitarian Coordinator in Nigeria, Mohamed Fall, issued the appeal after assailants attacked a crowded market in Kasuwan Daji, Borgu Local Government Area of Niger State on January 3.
Reports indicate that more than 30 people were killed in the attack, while an undetermined number of victims were taken away by the attackers. Market stalls and residential buildings were also torched during the raid.
Security incidents were also reported in Agwara Local Government Area of Niger State, as well as in parts of Kwara and Ondo states, with casualties including deaths and kidnappings. The renewed violence has heightened fears among residents already grappling with prolonged insecurity across the region.
Agwara local government area has remained a flashpoint for attacks on civilian targets. In November 2025, armed groups abducted more than 300 people during an assault on Saint Mary’s Catholic School in the area. Although the victims were later released, the incident drew national and international condemnation and renewed attention to the vulnerability of schools in conflict-affected communities.
Describing the recent attacks as serious violations of human rights, the UN official stressed that assaults on civilians, particularly women and children, erode the right to life and disrupt access to education. He warned that continued attacks on schools threaten children’s safety and undermine efforts to keep them in classrooms.
The United Nations extended condolences to families who lost relatives in the attacks and wished those injured a speedy recovery. It also called for the immediate release of all abducted persons and urged Nigerian authorities to ensure that those responsible are brought to justice in line with national and international legal standards.
Reaffirming its stance on education in emergencies, the UN reminded Nigeria of its commitment to the Safe Schools Declaration, which aims to protect schools from military use and violent attacks. The organisation noted that recent incidents highlight the urgent need to translate these commitments into concrete action.
The UN said it remains ready to work with federal and state authorities to improve civilian protection and promote safer learning environments amid Nigeria’s ongoing security challenges.
UN Urges Nigerian Authorities to Protect Civilians, Schools After Fresh Niger State Attacks
National News
Nigeria Faces Rising Cocaine and Heroin Trafficking from Brazil and Europe
Nigeria Faces Rising Cocaine and Heroin Trafficking from Brazil and Europe
By: Zagazola Makama
Nigeria is increasingly facing a severe public security challenge as Brazilian hard drugs, particularly cocaine and heroin, continue to inundate the country’s ports, airports, and border corridors. The recent case of the Brazilian vessel MV San Antonio, intercepted at Apapa Port in Lagos carrying 25.5 kilograms of cocaine, is emblematic of a broader trend of transnational drug trafficking that links Latin American production hubs to West African transit zones and ultimately to European consumer markets.
This phenomenon is neither isolated nor new, but rather a symptom of systemic weaknesses in global and regional law enforcement, as well as Nigeria’s strategic vulnerabilities. The movement of Brazilian cocaine into Nigeria is facilitated by highly sophisticated criminal networks, often led by organized syndicates such as the Primeiro Comando da Capital (PCC). This group, historically rooted in Brazil, has expanded its reach globally, leveraging logistical expertise, clandestine shipping routes, and advanced concealment methods to circumvent law enforcement.
In the MV San Antonio case, cocaine was hidden within a bulk sugar consignment, a method indicative of meticulous planning and an understanding of Nigeria’s import screening vulnerabilities. Such concealment illustrates the deliberate targeting of legitimate trade routes, which are difficult to monitor comprehensively due to high volumes of maritime traffic, understaffed customs units, and limited technological infrastructure.
It was revealed that these criminal networks operate through a complex value chain. The networks rely on intermediaries, “couriers,” and complicit port operators to facilitate the movement of narcotics from production centers in Brazil to consumer markets in Europe. Nigeria’s status as a populous West African nation with busy ports and an extensive informal economy makes it a particularly attractive node for transshipment.
Cocaine trafficking between Brazil and West Africa stretches back to at least three decade, Initially, West Africa played a minor role in the global cocaine trade, serving as a peripheral transit point. However, as cocaine cultivation in South America surged and European consumption increased, West African ports became strategic nodes.
Data show that by 2019, Nigeria, Ghana, and Sierra Leone had become prominent transit points for cocaine seized in Brazil. In 2021 alone, cultivation in Latin America reached record levels, and West Africa witnessed unprecedented seizures amounting to 24 tonnes, reflecting both the scale of trafficking and the intensification of smuggling efforts through the region. Intelligence indicates that traffickers exploit weak regulatory oversight, porous borders, and high demand in Europe to ensure a continuous flow of narcotics into the region.
The inflow of Brazilian hard drugs into Nigeria has profound security, economic, and social ramifications: The illicit trade fuels organized crime, armed gangs, and violent conflicts across Nigeria. Groups involved in smuggling often engage in kidnapping, terrorism, armed robbery, and inter-gang rivalries, contributing to the insecurity in the country. Drug proceeds are also frequently laundered through Nigeria’s informal economy and eventually funneled into formal financial institutions, undermining financial integrity and facilitating other criminal enterprises.
The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and ECOWAS have highlighted the nexus between drug trafficking and money laundering as a critical risk to economic stability. Increasing availability of cocaine and heroin exposes young people to addiction and associated social pathologies. Nigeria’s youth, particularly in coastal and urban areas, are highly vulnerable due to unemployment, weak social safety nets, and peer influence. The involvement of foreign vessels and nationals complicates enforcement and prosecution, potentially creating diplomatic tensions if due process is not meticulously followed. The reliance on multi-agency collaboration, including customs, NDLEA, and police, is essential but often hindered by bureaucratic inefficiencies.
Despite notable seizures like that of the MV San Antonio and airport arrests of Brazil-returnees concealing heroin and cocaine, systemic weaknesses persist: Apapa Port and Murtala Muhammed International Airport remain high-risk entry points due to inadequate scanning technology, insufficient manpower, and procedural bottlenecks. Smugglers exploit these gaps with increasingly sophisticated concealment methods. While intelligence-led operations have improved, Nigerian agencies still face challenges in real-time monitoring, cross-border data sharing, and predictive threat analysis.
Prosecuting transnational cases involves navigating complex legal frameworks, multiple jurisdictions, and ensuring adherence to human rights standards, especially for foreign nationals. The need for continued detention, as granted in the MV San Antonio case, illustrates both the procedural complexities and the necessity for investigative thoroughness.
The influx of Brazilian cocaine and heroin into Nigeria is a multidimensional threat, combining criminal sophistication, systemic vulnerabilities, and socio-economic consequences. The MV San Antonio seizure and similar interdictions draws attention to the gains of intelligence-led enforcement but also the urgent need for sustained investment in technology, regional collaboration, and strategic policy interventions.
Failure to act decisively risks entrenching Nigeria as a permanent hub for international drug trafficking, exacerbating violence, undermining economic stability, and threatening public health. Conversely, coordinated, evidence-based, and proactive measures can transform Nigeria from a vulnerable transit point into a resilient bulwark against the global narcotics trade.
Nigeria’s fight against transnational drug trafficking is not just a law enforcement challenge, it is a test of national governance, regional cooperation, and the country’s commitment to protecting its citizens and youth from the destructive consequences of illicit drugs.
Nigeria Faces Rising Cocaine and Heroin Trafficking from Brazil and Europe
-
News2 years agoRoger Federer’s Shock as DNA Results Reveal Myla and Charlene Are Not His Biological Children
-
Opinions4 years agoTHE PLIGHT OF FARIDA
-
News9 months agoFAILED COUP IN BURKINA FASO: HOW TRAORÉ NARROWLY ESCAPED ASSASSINATION PLOT AMID FOREIGN INTERFERENCE CLAIMS
-
Opinions4 years agoPOLICE CHARGE ROOMS, A MINTING PRESS
-
News2 years agoEYN: Rev. Billi, Distortion of History, and The Living Tamarind Tree
-
ACADEMICS2 years agoA History of Biu” (2015) and The Lingering Bura-Pabir Question (1)
-
Columns2 years agoArmy University Biu: There is certain interest, but certainly not from Borno.
-
Opinions2 years agoTinubu,Shettima: The epidemic of economic, insecurity in Nigeria
