Connect with us

News

Nigeria Should End Production of Fossil Energy to Achieved Planned Net Zero Carbon Emission in 2060- Climate Activists

Published

on

Nigeria Should End Production of Fossil Energy to Achieved Planned Net Zero Carbon Emission in 2060- Climate Activists

Nigeria Should End Production of Fossil Energy to Achieved Planned Net Zero Carbon Emission in 2060- Climate Activists

By Michael Mike

Nigeria has been asked to stop her carbon capture agenda but rather give priority to ending production of fossil energy as the key to achieving the planned net zero carbon emission by 2060.

A text of a press conference organised by the Glasgow Action Team, jointly addressed by Climate Activists Jonah Gbemre, Murphy Akiri and Jake Hess on World Bank’s investment in Carbon Capture in Nigeria in Commemoration of 2022 World Habitat Day, read that: “In his speech at the last UN Climate talks, President Buhari announced that Nigeria would become net zero by 2060,” while disclosing that “the government is looking for partners, technology, and finance to make cleaner and efficient use of all available resources for a more stable transition in energy markets.”

The Climate activists stated that it is crucial that the technologies to be deployed to achieve net zero carbon emission are scientifically proven, given the number of false solutions that are promoted by greenwashing lobbyists and financiers.

They argued that Nigeria, as a major oil producer, wants to prolong the status quo as much as possible, noting that: “Last year, the vice president wrote an article denouncing growing calls for fossil fuel divestment. Nigeria’s climate policy heavily relies on so-called ‘carbon sinks’—meaning the country plans to keep burning fossil fuels, but supposedly remove the emissions after they’ve been produced (presumably through Carbon Capture and Storage and other unrealistic solutions, like planting trees).”

They however insisted that: “The risk of carbon capture and storage is that it provides a pretext to continue burning fossil fuels instead of switching to clean energy. The science is clear that we need to rapidly transition away from fossil fuels if we want to achieve a safe climate for all. Obviously, the fossil fuel industry doesn’t want to do that—so they tell us to give them money for carbon capture instead.

The climate activists claimed that: “Carbon capture is a totally unproven solution. In a recent op-ed co-authored by an MIT scientists Charles Harvey and Hurt House they detailed how carbon capture has failed in the USA and distracted from real solutions. No wonder the World Bank’s climate action plan makes a few passing references to it, using weasel words to the effect that carbon capture “may” be a solution—that’s the Bank’s way of acknowledging there’s absolutely no proof of concept for the idea.”

They added that: “The science is clear: The world is on a countdown to climate catastrophe if it does not cut carbon emissions. It’s now or never. The World Bank is a major investor of public money into energy projects and sets the norms for other multilateral lenders and crowds in private finance, so it is essential that those running the World Bank acknowledge the real-world impacts of its funding.”

They recommended that: “A Future Fit World Bank must genuinely help to reduce carbon emissions by shifting financing from fossil fuels to renewables and help ensure that new infrastructure benefits local communities and prepares workforces to operate a clean economy.”

The activists said to achieve this the World Bank must: “Stop using public money to bankroll dirty polluters. Sign the Glasgow Clean Energy statement before the next COP and leave fossil fuels in the ground. Close loopholes allowing private lenders and asset managers to continue extracting and exploiting fossil fuels.

“Align all policies, programmes and projects into a 1.5-degree roadmap with poverty alleviation at its heart. Prioritise investment in Global South renewable energy projects, with civil society input, toward publicly owned, democratically controlled systems that serve the common good instead of private profit.

“Stop hoarding reserves and mobilise $1 trillion in new, genuinely green finance.
Move away from an extractive model of financing towards delivering a just transition, through investments which benefit people on the poverty line instead of the 1%. Evaluate impact through the lens of sustainability, equity and justice. Actively champion an independent body to restructure sovereign debt.

“Raise ambitions so that half of all World Bank financing is on climate adaptation and mitigation, given the scale and urgency of the crisis. Candidates for World Bank Leadership should be accountable and committed to scientific evidence.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

FG, Ohanaeze Outlaw ‘Eze Ndigbo’ Titles Abroad Amid Rising Diplomatic Tensions

Published

on

FG, Ohanaeze Outlaw ‘Eze Ndigbo’ Titles Abroad Amid Rising Diplomatic Tensions

By: Michael Mike

The Federal Government has moved to curb the controversial installation of “Eze Ndigbo” in foreign countries, backing a sweeping decision by Ohanaeze Ndigbo Worldwide and South East traditional rulers to abolish the practice outside Igboland, following a series of international incidents that have strained Nigeria’s diplomatic relations.

Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu, delivered the government’s position at the high-level Imeobi meeting of Ohanaeze in Enugu on Thursday, describing the proliferation of Igbo “kings” in the diaspora as a growing embarrassment to Nigeria and a trigger for avoidable conflicts abroad.

She warned that while diaspora communities are free to promote their culture, attempts to replicate traditional rulership structures in foreign lands have repeatedly sparked tensions with host authorities and local populations.

The latest flashpoint occurred in East London, where the coronation of Solomon Ogbonna Eziko ignited violent protests. The unrest led to the destruction of property, attacks on foreign-owned businesses, and clashes with security forces, after locals interpreted the installation as a challenge to South Africa’s traditional authority system.

South African institutions, including the Eastern Cape House of Traditional and Khoi-San Leaders and the Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs, declared the coronation illegal, underscoring the diplomatic sensitivity of such actions.

Nigeria’s foreign missions quickly distanced themselves from the development, with officials clarifying that the event was merely cultural and not a recognized monarchy. The Nigerian Embassy in Pretoria subsequently issued an apology and urged citizens to maintain a low profile.

Odumegwu-Ojukwu revealed that similar tensions had surfaced in Accra in 2025, where protests against Nigerians escalated over the same issue. She led a diplomatic delegation to calm the situation, engaging directly with John Mahama and other key stakeholders.

According to her, the intervention of the Ghanaian president was pivotal in diffusing tensions, as he reaffirmed his country’s commitment to ECOWAS protocols on free movement and rejected calls for xenophobic actions against Nigerians.

The minister stressed that such crises place Nigerian lives, businesses, and diplomatic standing at risk, insisting that urgent measures were necessary to prevent further escalation.

In response, Ohanaeze Ndigbo Worldwide has formally proscribed the conferment and use of “Eze Ndigbo” titles outside Igboland. President-General of the organization, Azuta Mbata, declared that any individual assuming such a title abroad does so without the backing of the Igbo people.

He disclosed that the group would notify state governments and Nigerian missions globally of the decision and is working with traditional rulers to establish sanctions for violators, including community-level enforcement through hometowns and town unions.

The Federal Government has pledged to reinforce the directive through its diplomatic channels, signaling a coordinated effort to prevent further international disputes linked to cultural misrepresentation.

The development marks a decisive shift by both the government and Igbo leadership to separate cultural expression from traditional authority in diaspora settings, amid growing concern over the global implications of local customs.

FG, Ohanaeze Outlaw ‘Eze Ndigbo’ Titles Abroad Amid Rising Diplomatic Tensions

Continue Reading

News

Africa, France Move to Reset Economic Ties at Nairobi Summit

Published

on

Africa, France Move to Reset Economic Ties at Nairobi Summit

By: Michael Mike

African leaders and their French counterparts are set for a critical engagement next month as Kenya and France prepare to host the Africa Forward Summit: Africa–France Partnerships for Innovation and Growth in Nairobi, amid growing calls for a new model of cooperation that delivers real economic impact for the continent.

The summit, scheduled for May 11–12, 2026, will convene top political leaders including Emmanuel Macron and William Ruto, alongside African Heads of State, investors, development partners, civil society groups, and youth representatives.

A Business Forum on May 11 is expected to drive private sector engagement and set the tone for the main summit, where discussions will centre on investment, innovation, and long-term economic collaboration.

Organisers said the summit is designed to move beyond diplomatic symbolism, focusing instead on actionable partnerships in key sectors such as healthcare, agriculture, digital technology, energy, and infrastructure—areas considered vital to Africa’s transformation.

For countries like Nigeria, the outcomes could be significant, offering pathways to attract investment, create jobs, and strengthen economic resilience at a time of global uncertainty.

The summit comes against the backdrop of evolving relations between Africa and France, marked by increasing demands from African nations for more equitable and transparent partnerships.

Historically, France has maintained strong political, economic, and military ties with several African countries, particularly in West and Central Africa. However, in recent years, these relationships have come under scrutiny, with critics calling for an end to perceived imbalances and a shift toward mutual respect and shared benefits.

At the same time, Africa’s global relevance has risen, driven by its growing population, expanding markets, and strategic importance in global supply chains. This has intensified competition among global powers seeking influence on the continent, prompting France to recalibrate its engagement strategy.

The Africa Forward Summit is seen as part of that reset—an attempt to reposition France as a partner in innovation and sustainable development rather than a traditional power broker.

The timing is also significant as it feeds into preparations for the upcoming G7 Summit, where Africa’s economic future, climate challenges, and development financing are expected to dominate discussions.

Analysts said the Nairobi meeting could serve as a testing ground for how Africa and its international partners engage moving forward—shifting from aid-driven relationships to investment-led cooperation.

With unemployment rising and infrastructure gaps widening across many African economies, expectations are high that the summit will produce concrete commitments rather than broad declarations.

Diplomatic missions in Abuja have indicated that further details will be unveiled at a press briefing, but stakeholders are already positioning the summit as a defining moment in reshaping Africa–Europe relations.

If successful, the Africa Forward Summit could mark a turning point—signaling a transition from historic ties to future-focused partnerships built on innovation, shared prosperity, and measurable outcomes.

Africa, France Move to Reset Economic Ties at Nairobi Summit

.

Continue Reading

News

Experts Sound Alarm Over Unregulated AI in Nigeria’s Healthcare System

Published

on

Experts Sound Alarm Over Unregulated AI in Nigeria’s Healthcare System

By: Michael Mike

Growing adoption of artificial intelligence in Nigeria’s healthcare sector is outpacing regulatory safeguards, raising concerns among experts who warned that without urgent oversight, the technology could deepen inequality and expose patients to new risks.

This warning took centre stage at a policy dialogue titled “AI in Healthcare: Risk or Asset?”, held Thursday at the French Institute in Abuja, where stakeholders from government, medicine, and development circles examined the expanding role of AI in health service delivery.

Speakers at the forum acknowledged that AI is already transforming diagnostics, laboratory systems, and patient management. However, they cautioned that Nigeria’s regulatory environment has yet to catch up with the speed of innovation.

Director of the French Institute, Thierry Vapentin, set the tone for the discussions, describing the platform as a space to confront emerging global issues through open debate. He stressed the importance of interrogating both the opportunities and ethical dilemmas posed by AI in critical sectors like healthcare.

Delivering a policy perspective, Dr. Anthony Ayeke of the European Union Delegation noted that while AI could significantly improve access and efficiency in healthcare delivery across Africa, blind reliance on automated systems could undermine professional judgment and patient safety. He emphasized that human oversight must remain central in all AI-driven processes.

In his intervention, the CEO of Premier Health Systems Consults, Dr. Niyi Osamiluyi argued that Nigeria urgently needs a clearly defined ethical and regulatory framework to guide AI deployment. He outlined key principles including transparency, inclusiveness, accountability, data protection, and auditability, warning that failure to assign responsibility for AI outcomes could create dangerous accountability gaps.

The issue of data integrity also featured prominently. Joshua Kojalo highlighted ongoing government-backed digital health initiatives, particularly mobile applications designed to expand access to health insurance. However, he warned that overdependence on foreign datasets could embed bias into local systems, potentially excluding vulnerable populations. He called for deliberate investment in locally generated data to ensure fairness and accuracy.

From an operational standpoint, Dr. Temitope Agbana, Co-founder of AIDX Medical, shared field experiences demonstrating AI’s impact on laboratory efficiency, noting that automated systems have significantly increased processing capacity. Despite these gains, he maintained that technology must remain a support tool rather than a substitute for human expertise, stressing that no AI system is entirely error-proof.

Equity concerns dominated the latter part of the discussion, with Dr. Chimezie Anyakora, CEO of Bloom Public Health, warning that weak regulation could leave already disadvantaged communities exposed to the harshest consequences of technological failure. He cautioned that without deliberate safeguards, AI could reinforce existing healthcare disparities rather than bridge them.

Participants agreed that Nigeria risks creating a two-tier healthcare system where advanced AI-driven services are accessible only to the wealthy, while rural and low-income populations are left behind.

The forum concluded with a strong consensus that Nigeria must act swiftly to establish robust regulatory frameworks, invest in capacity building, and ensure inclusive access. Experts stressed that while AI holds immense potential to transform healthcare delivery, its benefits will only be realized if innovation is matched with responsibility.

Without decisive action, they warned, the same technology that promises progress could ultimately widen the gap it seeks to close.

Experts Sound Alarm Over Unregulated AI in Nigeria’s Healthcare System

Continue Reading

Trending

Verified by MonsterInsights