Politics
Of Nigeria and Britain: Between Vice President Shettima and Kemi Badenoch
Of Nigeria and Britain: Between Vice President Shettima and Kemi Badenoch
By: Dr. James Bwala
The recent conversation between Nigerian Vice President Kashim Shettima and UK politician Kemi Badenoch highlights the complexity of national identification and the responsibilities associated with heritage. Shettima’s condemnation of Badenoch’s harsh remarks about Nigeria emphasizes an important facet of leadership: the necessity to cultivate pride in one’s origins, particularly among public personalities. His bold proposal that Badenoch “remove the Kemi from her name” if she is not proud of her Nigerian heritage exemplifies a larger debate over leaders’ accountability to their native country.
Contrasting Badenoch’s words with those of Rishi Sunak reinforces Shettima’s claim; Sunak has maintained a positive narrative about his Indian origin, demonstrating the critical role that leaders have in shaping perceptions. While Badenoch affirms her right to discuss personal experiences and criticisms about Nigeria, leaders must strike a balance between open speech and constructive patriotism. This occurrence prompts contemplation on how people in positions of power manage their dual identities while representing their country on global forums.
Shettima not only defends Nigeria’s image but also stimulates a broader discussion about leaders’ roles in creating a balanced narrative that recognizes both challenges and accomplishments within their cultural heritage. In this context, Shettima’s leadership goes beyond criticism; it represents a challenge to leaders to engage in dialogues that not only solve concerns but also celebrate the rich tapestry of their cultural landscapes.
Shettima’s approach emphasizes the necessity of leaders functioning as both critics and ambassadors, inspiring positive change and harmony in their communities. Shettima’s approach urges leaders to accept a dual role in which they may be forthright about difficulties while still serving as guardians of hope and progress for their countries. Shettima emphasizes the importance of leaders constructively addressing their legacy with a feeling of duty that extends beyond personal complaints.
In light of this, Shettima’s remark is a heartbreaking reminder of the power leaders wield in influencing perceptions and instilling national pride. Shettima’s nuanced approach calls for a contemplative and forward-thinking leadership style, one that recognizes the complexity of identity while working to bridge gaps and encourage inclusivity. Shettima’s leadership calls on other leaders to reconsider their roles as cultural guardians capable of influencing global perceptions and fostering a sense of collective identity.
Shettima’s challenge to Badenoch’s narrative not only preserves Nigeria’s integrity but also establishes a precedent for leaders to engage in productive debates that foster understanding and mutual respect. Shettima’s gentle correction of Badenoch highlights the significance of respectful discussion and a shared commitment to truth in creating an environment in which traditional narratives are not only preserved but also embraced. In doing so, Shettima shows the role of a leader who views constructive criticism as a tool for empowerment rather than alienation, arguing for narratives that are both introspective and globally relevant.
Shettima navigates this difficult subject by emphasizing the importance of a balanced depiction of one’s background as well as acknowledging the different experiences that define individual identities. Shettima displays a leadership style that promotes constructive engagement over divisive language by creating an environment conducive to dialogue among various viewpoints.
In response to Badenoch’s statements, Shettima underlined the significance of respecting and enjoying one’s ancestry while engaging in constructive criticism. Shettima underscores the idea that constructive criticism should try to enhance rather than denigrate by drawing parallels with leaders such as Rishi Sunak, who appreciate their past without dismissing it. By contrasting Badenoch’s complaints with Rishi Sunak’s pleasure in his Indian background, Shettima effectively advocates for a balanced discourse that recognizes the complexity of one’s cultural story while calling for development and reform.
While this has created significant disagreement among Nigerians, many support Shettima’s approach. This support is due to a sense of national pride and a desire for constructive criticism rather than disparagement. Shettima’s claim that Badenoch’s words denigrate her Nigerian ancestry resonates with residents who believe that criticism should be based on love and a desire to improve, rather than contempt.
The divergent responses of Shettima and Badenoch illustrate opposing views on national identity. While Badenoch stresses corruption and insecurity in Nigeria, which are unquestionably important issues, many Nigerians believe her approach lacks nuance and fails to recognize the country’s potential. Supporters think that displaying achievements with criticisms promotes a more fair discussion about Nigeria’s future.
Nigerians’ support for Shettima demonstrates a shared desire for unity and pride in their country. Instead of perpetuating negative preconceptions, they argue for an approach that stimulates debate and seeks solutions. In this setting, supporting Shettima is interpreted as opposing external narratives that do not truly reflect Nigeria’s intricacies. Nigerians who support Shettima are not only defending their country’s image but also arguing for a more dignified narrative that embraces Nigeria’s rich cultural legacy and growth.
READ ALSO:https://newsng.ng/umth-how-professor-ahidjos-transformation-agenda-impacted-the-information-unit/
This collective mood reflects a deeper desire by Nigerians to recover their narrative and exercise control over how their country is seen on a global scale. This shift to a more positive and self-determined narrative is critical for instilling national pride and encouraging residents to actively participate in the country’s progress. This change towards empowerment and self-representation is critical to redefining Nigeria’s position in the international arena.
I believe that this movement is about instilling in Nigerians a sense of ownership and responsibility to address their own difficulties while enjoying their triumphs, rather than simply responding to external criticism. Simultaneously, this support for Shettima’s position demonstrates a rising awareness among Nigerians of the importance of constructively engaging with their country’s difficulties rather than letting external criticism define their identity. This expanding consciousness is evident in public discourse, which is increasingly emphasizing constructive criticism and collaborative attempts to address national concerns.
Indeed, Kemi Badenoch’s recent utterances on Nigeria have raised serious worries about her potential disloyalty to Britain. Badenoch’s criticism of Nigeria, notably her categorization of northern sections as terrorist havens, appears to emphasize political expediency over a thorough understanding of her country. Such disparaging remarks not only alienate a sizable segment of the Nigerian diaspora but also indicate a readiness to abuse her background for personal advantage. This action could imply that if she can easily betray her native nation, she may also discard British ideals when politically expedient.
I am afraid that this pattern of denunciation may reflect a wish to disassociate herself from Nigeria’s poor image and appeal to British voters. However, this raises concerns about her honesty and loyalty. The “double agent dilemma” suggests that voters may interpret her comments as evidence of underlying disloyalty. Ultimately, Badenoch’s rhetoric may indicate that she is more concerned with political ambition than with defending the principles connected with any nation.
Her stance, marked by the strategic denunciation of her roots, could be interpreted as a tactical strategy to strengthen her position in British politics at the expense of true commitment. Such actions may give British residents the impression that her commitment is more motivated by personal ambition than by national loyalty. This view may weaken trust among constituents, who expect constant commitment to their country’s interests.
This loss of trust could have serious consequences for her political future, as people may look for leaders whose commitment is seen as absolute and steadfast. This sense of opportunism may cause voters to wonder whether her commitment is actually to the country she serves or whether it is only for her personal progress in the political scene. This doubt about her motives may lead people to gravitate toward candidates whose commitment to national interests is unquestionable.
* Dr. James Bwala, PhD, writes from Abuja.
Of Nigeria and Britain: Between Vice President Shettima and Kemi Badenoch
Politics
I’ll run inclusive governance, sustain Fintiri’s achievements, if elected governor- Galadima
I’ll run inclusive governance, sustain Fintiri’s achievements, if elected governor- Galadima
Alhaji Tijjani Galadima, a governorship aspirant under the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Adamawa State has pledged to be fair, just while ensuring people-centred leadership, if elected governor in the 2027 general elections.
Galadima who is the immediate past Executive Secretary of the Petroleum Technology Development Fund (PTDF) gave the assurance during a stakeholders’ engagement in Yola.
He commended the administration of President Bola Tinubu, describing the administration’s policies as impactful on national development.
According to him, his administration and that of Tinubu would work together and continue to impact positively across the grassroots.
Galadima further lauded Gov. Ahmadu Fintiri for his visionary leadership adding that his achievements have created a strong foundation for growth.
He added that his administration would also focus on continuity, unity, inclusive governance, stressing that no segment of the state would be left behind under his leadership.
Galadima thanked party members and supporters for their encouragement and loyalty, assuring them that their confidence in him would not be misplaced.
Earlier, in his address, Kevin Peter, Galadima’s campaign Director-General said, Galadima is qualified to be the next Governor of Adamawa because of his experience and leadership capacity needed to move the state forward.
He called on the party delegates and the electorates to support Galadima’s ambition to succeed.
In their separate remarks, Prof. Maxwell Gidado and Lilian Steven, party Stalwarts expressed optimism that Galadima would consolidate on the achievements of the present administration if elected governor.
They said Galadima is a leader with the vision and competence to deliver quality governance and improve the living conditions of citizens across the state.
I’ll run inclusive governance, sustain Fintiri’s achievements, if elected governor- Galadima
2027: Between President Tinubu And Vice President Kashim Shettima
By: Dr. James Bwala
In the realm of political discourse, especially during the critical periods leading up to general elections, rumors and speculative reports often emerge, attempting to sway public perception and influence outcomes. One such instance is the recent report by the Nigerian Tribune Newspapers on May 17, 2026, suggesting intensified efforts within the ruling establishment to replace Vice President Kashim Shettima amid internal political consultations. This narrative, which paints a picture of discord and impending change in the vice-presidential slot, is not only baseless but also misleading. In reality, Vice President Kashim Shettima remains a steadfast pillar in the administration’s strategy for the 2027 general elections, working in unison with President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to deliver victory for the All Progressive Congress (APC).
The unfounded claims surrounding the so-called “Shettima issue” are the new kite the enemies of this partnership between President Tinubu and Vice President Kashim Shettima are trying to sell in their continuous attempts to dismantle the progress already achieved and reaffirm their continuous lack of ideas over what made Tinubu and Shettima’s partnership thick. While they are entitled to their own beliefs and strategies, the renewed vision and partnership between the president and vice president for a stronger, unified Nigeria stand tall and shine constantly in position like a northern star.
READ ALSO: https://newsng.ng/apc-2027-will-consensus-enforce-anti-party-as-a-result-of-collapses-in-internal-democracy/
While they failed in their imaginations, we build. The context and motivations behind the propagation of such misleading reports are not far-fetched. Nigerian politics, characterized by fierce competition and complex alliances, is often marred by misinformation aimed at destabilizing governing coalitions. Reports insinuating a potential replacement of Vice President Shettima seemingly emerge from rival political interests who seek to fracture the APC’s front in the crucial northern regions where Shettima wields significant influence. By casting doubt on the vice president’s position, these reports aim to sow confusion among supporters and create fissures within the party’s grassroots structure. However, looking closely at the facts and recent developments reveals no basis for these rumors.
Vice President Kashim Shettima’s role in the current administration has been instrumental—not only as a vice president but, more importantly, as a strategic leader who mobilizes support across the North. His roots and connections in this region have proven invaluable in consolidating the party’s influence and outreach, especially now. Since assuming office, Shettima has consistently demonstrated loyalty to President Tinubu’s administration and an unwavering commitment to the broader national agenda. The assertion that internal consultations are targeting his removal contradicts observable realities and official statements from both the presidency and the APC leadership, all of which underscore unity and forward momentum.
READ ALSO: https://newsng.ng/apc-2027-will-consensus-enforce-anti-party-as-a-result-of-collapses-in-internal-democracy/
The idea that high-level consultations and behind-the-scenes political maneuvers are underway to replace Shettima ignores the transparent and collaborative nature of the Tinubu-Shettima partnership. Both leaders have publicly reiterated their dedication to working together towards the success of the upcoming 2027 elections. Their collaboration is rooted not only in political expediency but also in a shared vision of governance, economic development, and national cohesion. This synergy has been evident in various policy implementations and campaigns aimed at fostering growth and stability, dispelling any notion that their alliance is fragile or conditional.
The vice president’s focus remains resolute on positioning the APC for electoral success. His active engagement with party stakeholders, community leaders, and electorates across the northern geopolitical zones confirms his central role in the campaign apparatus. Efforts to undermine this position are not only premature but counterproductive. It would be illogical for the ruling party to disrupt a winning formula, particularly when Shettima’s involvement is critical to maintaining the party’s stronghold in strategically vital states. This consistency in leadership and messaging helps sustain public confidence and project an image of stability, both domestically and internationally.
READ ALSO: https://newsng.ng/apc-2027-will-consensus-enforce-anti-party-as-a-result-of-collapses-in-internal-democracy/
President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s administration has consciously prioritized the cultivation of a leadership team grounded in trust, competence, and mutual respect. The strength of the partnership between Tinubu and Shettima lies in their complementary attributes—Tinubu’s political acumen and national stature combined with Shettima’s grassroots connections and regional influence form a formidable alliance. This relationship is not merely transactional but built on a shared commitment to delivering on the promises of a new Nigeria—a nation defined by inclusivity, prosperity, and democratic consolidation.
Critics and opponents who propagate the “Shettima issue” narrative must consider the potential consequences of their actions. Spreading falsehoods undermines not only the individuals involved but also the democratic process itself. Political maturity dictates that differences and challenges be addressed through dialogue and institutional mechanisms rather than through sensationalist media narratives or unsubstantiated claims. The APC, under the leadership of Tinubu and Shettima, exemplifies this maturity by focusing on policy priorities and voter engagement rather than succumbing to divisive distractions.
READ ALSO: https://newsng.ng/apc-2027-will-consensus-enforce-anti-party-as-a-result-of-collapses-in-internal-democracy/
Importantly, the renewed hope for a stronger Nigeria encapsulated in the Tinubu-Shettima vision is one that transcends individual positions or political convenience. It is a collective aspiration for national growth, peace, and stability that resonates deeply with the citizenry. Their joint campaign promises reflect commitments to infrastructural development, job creation, security enhancement, and education reform—areas that directly affect the lives of millions of Nigerians. To suggest instability within the leadership based on unfounded reports is to disregard the tangible progress and strategic planning underway.
The report by the Nigerian Tribune Newspapers alleging internal political turmoil regarding Vice President Kashim Shettima is not only inaccurate but dangerously misleading. Such narratives serve no constructive purpose and only detract from the significant work being done by the ruling administration to steer Nigeria towards a prosperous future. Vice President Kashim Shettima remains fully engaged and indispensable in the campaign to secure the APC’s victory in the upcoming elections. His partnership with President Bola Ahmed Tinubu is solid, visionary, and crucial to the realization of a new Nigeria. Those anticipating a change in this dynamic have already miscalculated the strength of this alliance and the determination of the leaders involved. The administration’s focus remains clear: to build a Nigeria that offers hope, opportunity, and progress for all its citizens.
* James Bwala, PhD, writes from Abuja.
2027: Between President Tinubu And Vice President Kashim Shettima
Yobe APC guber candidate calls for unity, urges Tumsa and others to withdraw
By: Yahaya Wakili
The All Progressives Congress (APC) gubernatorial candidate for Yobe state, Alhaji Baba Mallam Wali Fcan, mni, has called on the three remaining aspirants, Barr. Kashim Musa Tumsah, Engr. Mai Hajja, and Hon. Bashir Shariff Machina, to withdraw and come to unite and work as one family to move Yobe state forward.
Baba Mallam Wali made the call yesterday in Nguru town while thousands of APC supporters turned out en masse to welcome him since he became the gubernatorial candidate of the party. He said, “I am a native of Nguru, and since the restoration of democracy in 1999, this zone has never gotten such an opportunity, not even the deputy governor.”
He maintained that, before there were G-6, three had already withdrawn, and the first aspirant to step down was the former Senate President, Senator Ahmed Ibrahim Lawan GCON; secondly, Lawan Kolo; thirdly, the former inspector general of police, Usman Baba Alkali; and today, we thank God, Senator Ibrahim Mohammed Bomai stepped down, respectively.
Therefore, the 3 remaining aspirants, Kashim Tumsah, Engr. Mai Hajja, and Bashir Shariff Machina, I call on them; let them step down, come, and unite ourselves to work together to move Yobe State forward, adding that Yobe remains one indivisible political family under the APC.
The gubernatorial candidate hailed Senator Musa Mustapha, Senator Ahmed Ibrahim Lawan GCON, Senator Ibrahim Mohammed Bomai, Lawan Kolo, and former IGP Usman Baba Alkali for their maturity, patriotism, and commitment to party unity following their withdrawal from the 2027 governorship race.
“His Excellency, Governor Mai Mala Buni CON, COMN, is a strong politician; his political career has been marked by vast experience, national influence, and remarkable achievements. He is a national chairman and national secretary of our great party, APC, and up to now, he is a great and strong politician. I worked with him as the secretary to the government for 7 years; therefore, I learned so many things from him.
According to Wali, His Excellency Senator Ibrahim Geidam, FCAE, Minister of Police Affairs and the leader of Yobe State politics, exhibited a rare blend of leadership and pragmatic governance and is a masterclass in dedicated politics and public service. Therefore, I worked with these leaders, and I learned so many things from them.
Yobe APC guber candidate calls for unity, urges Tumsa and others to withdraw
One Killed, Two Injured in Suspected Terror Attack in Zamfara
Zulum: Borno Will Deliver Tinubu, APC Candidates in 2027 Elections
Cuba Accuses US of Building ‘False Case’ for Possible Invasion Amid Rising Tensions
Roger Federer’s Shock as DNA Results Reveal Myla and Charlene Are Not His Biological Children
THE PLIGHT OF FARIDA
FAILED COUP IN BURKINA FASO: HOW TRAORÉ NARROWLY ESCAPED ASSASSINATION PLOT AMID FOREIGN INTERFERENCE CLAIMS
-
News2 years agoRoger Federer’s Shock as DNA Results Reveal Myla and Charlene Are Not His Biological Children
-
Opinions4 years ago
THE PLIGHT OF FARIDA
-
News1 year agoFAILED COUP IN BURKINA FASO: HOW TRAORÉ NARROWLY ESCAPED ASSASSINATION PLOT AMID FOREIGN INTERFERENCE CLAIMS
-
News2 years agoEYN: Rev. Billi, Distortion of History, and The Living Tamarind Tree
-
Opinions4 years agoPOLICE CHARGE ROOMS, A MINTING PRESS
-
ACADEMICS2 years agoA History of Biu” (2015) and The Lingering Bura-Pabir Question (1)
-
Columns2 years agoArmy University Biu: There is certain interest, but certainly not from Borno.
-
Opinions2 years agoTinubu,Shettima: The epidemic of economic, insecurity in Nigeria
