Connect with us

News

Procurement Act Review: NEFGAD Decries that Over 70% of Public Procurements Done in Bedrooms, Says Amendment of Act Long Overdue

Published

on

Procurement Act Review: NEFGAD Decries that Over 70% of Public Procurements Done in Bedrooms, Says Amendment of Act Long Overdue

By: Michael Mike

A public procurement advocacy group, Network for the Actualization of Social Growth and Viable Development (NEFGAD) has decried that 70 percent of procurement proceedings are being initiated and concluded in the bedrooms of privileged few in the country, even as it
commended the Federal Government over plan to review the public procurement Act 2007 for possible amendments.

The group in a statement, signed by its head of office, Mr Akingunola Omoniyi and made available to Saturday in Abuja. said President Bola Tinubu has again demonstrated courage and tact in tackling one of the most vicious enemies of the country’s growth and development.

Akingunola stressed that ‘’the current Public Procurement Act enacted about 15 years ago is due for review in line with global best practices and changing operational dynamics in the public contracting sector.”

He noted that the Public Procurement in Nigeria has become an ‘anything goes’ phenomenon whereby everything and anything is possible maintaining that the Public Procurement Act in its current form is creating veneer of legality to blatant procurement illegality.

Read Also: We Must Develop Our Agric Sector To Self-sufficiency, VP Shettima Tells Governors

He said: “The Act as it stands has been so bastardised to such an extent that restricted/selective tendency is now a norm rather than exception with more than 70 percent of procurement proceedings being initiated and concluded in the bedrooms of privileged few on whom the Act placed so much supervisory and regulatory responsibilities. The implication of this dastardly act is that 70 percent of the contract sum ended up under the same bedroom through which the procurement proceedings emanated as against solving critical national developmental problems.”

Akingunola emphasised that the Public Procurement Act is not creating any obstruction or impediment to development as what some self serving elements will want the people to beleif, the only timeline set out by the Procurement Act is the mandatory six weeks newspaper advertisement period for bid solicitation, and the wisdom in this is to promote competitiveness that will ensure economy and value for money, all other timeline and processes are at the discretion of procuring entities.

The statement further emphasised that for the country to be littered with over 11,000 abandoned federal projects alone under a regulated procurement system shows that it is the corrupt few that are now regulating their pockets.

‘’One of the major contributing factor for the bastardization of the procurement system in the country is that successive governments are in the habit of enforcing the Procurement Act in breach by the non constitution of the National Procurement Council and appointing Director General for the Bureau of Public Procurement (BPP) through the back door of non-competitive selection.

Akingunola admonished president Tinubu not to consider the distractive proposal of some people making the President head of National Procurement Council, noting that presidents all over the world only sit to discuss policies and programmes not with contractors to debate contracts either at weekly Federal Executive Council or as Chairman of a National Procurement Council.

He also advised the government to enslaved stiffer sanctions against rampant mis-procurement particularly reverse-procurement whereby procurement proceedings are initiated and sometimes concluded without cash backing.
End

Procurement Act Review: NEFGAD Decries that Over 70% of Public Procurements Done in Bedrooms, Says Amendment of Act Long Overdue

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

ISWAP scamper in disarray as NAF, ground troops repel attack on Banki in Bama LGA

Published

on

ISWAP scamper in disarray as NAF, ground troops repel attack on Banki in Bama LGA

By: Zagazola Makama

Fighters of the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP) reportedly fled in disarray on Friday after troops of Operation Hadin Kai, supported by the Nigerian Air Force (NAF), successfully repelled an attempted attack on a military base in Banki, Bama Local Government Area of Borno.

Security sources told Zagazola Makama that the insurgents launched the attack in the early hours of Friday, advancing in large numbers in an attempt to overrun the military formation.

The sources said the troops immediately engaged the terrorists in a fierce gun battle, effectively resisting the assault and preventing the insurgents from breaching the base.

According to the sources, while the exchange of fire was ongoing, the Nigerian Air Force scrambled an aircraft to provide aerial support to the ground troops.

“On sighting the approaching aircraft, the terrorists took to their heels and were seen scampering in disarray into nearby bushes to escape the superior firepower of the troops and the air component,” one of the sources said.

The sources added that the attempted attack was successfully foiled, forcing the insurgents to abandon the operation.

There were no immediate reports of casualties as security forces have commenced assessment and clearance operations in the area.

Banki, a border town near Cameroon in Bama LGA, remains one of the key frontline locations in the ongoing counter-insurgency campaign in Borno.

ISWAP scamper in disarray as NAF, ground troops repel attack on Banki in Bama LGA

Continue Reading

News

Freight forwarders protest arbitrary shipping charges at Apapa ports

Published

on

Freight forwarders protest arbitrary shipping charges at Apapa ports

By: Zagazola Makama

The National Association of Government Approved Freight Forwarders (NAGAFF) has raised concerns over what it described as arbitrary and unilateral increases in shipping charges by some shipping companies at the Apapa ports in Lagos.

The grievances were contained in a letter addressed to the Executive Secretary of the Nigerian Shippers Council, Park Lane, Apapa, and copied to the Commissioner of Police, Ports Authority Police (Western Command), Apapa.

The letter, titled “Administrative Overreach: The Non-Consensual and Arbitrary Increase of Shipping Charges in Breach of Established Procedure and Protocol,” was received at about 2:30 p.m. on March 12.

Following the complaint, the Commissioner of Police, Ports Authority Police Western Command, Apapa, convened a meeting with the leadership of NAGAFF to discuss the issue.

Those in attendance included Mr Bert Okeke, Secretary and representative of the NAGAFF Chairman, Alhaji Ibrahim Tanko; Mr Uche Nwabude, Operational Head; and Chief Raf Nwoye, Technical Director at the association’s headquarters, alongside eight other members.

During the meeting, the NAGAFF leaders expressed dissatisfaction over the alleged immediate and unilateral upward review of shipping charges by some companies without prior notification to freight forwarders and other service users.

They described the development as a breach of established procedures guiding port operations and trade facilitation.

In her response, the Commissioner of Police, Ports Authority Police Western Command, commended the association for following due process by engaging relevant stakeholders and bringing the matter to the attention of authorities.

She urged the union leaders to remain law-abiding and advised them to notify the police and obtain approval before embarking on any picketing or protest actions.

The police chief also encouraged the association to suspend any planned industrial action pending efforts by the Nigerian Shippers Council to mediate and resolve the dispute.

She further called for sustained synergy, collaboration and consolidation between the police and stakeholders in the maritime sector to ensure smooth trade facilitation at the ports.

The meeting ended at about 3:25 p.m.

Freight forwarders protest arbitrary shipping charges at Apapa ports

Continue Reading

News

“When two elephants fight, it is the grass that suffers”- The Case of Iran Israel United States Conflict

Published

on

“When two elephants fight, it is the grass that suffers”- The Case of Iran Israel United States Conflict

By: Michael Mike

From the ancient Persian world to the Swahili coast of Africa, the story of Iran is not merely political—it is civilizational. The current conflict therefore raises questions not only about power, but about history, justice and humanity itself.

In Africa, a well-known proverb captures a timeless truth: “When two elephants fight, it is the grass that suffers.” Across the wider African continent, this saying reminds us that when powerful actors collide, it is ordinary people—families, children and communities—who bear the greatest cost.

Today, as tensions escalate across West Asia and military strikes attributed to the United States and Israel target the Islamic Republic of Iran, the world is witnessing a confrontation that extends far beyond the calculations of geopolitics.

To strike Iran is not merely to confront a modern state. It is to challenge one of the oldest living civilizations on Earth—a civilization whose cultural, intellectual and spiritual influence has shaped vast regions of the world for more than three thousand years.

A Civilization Older Than the Modern World

Long before the modern geopolitical map of the Middle East existed, the Iranian plateau had already produced organized states, complex administrative systems and vibrant intellectual traditions.

From the Achaemenid Empire of Cyrus the Great to the flourishing cultural centers of Shiraz and Isfahan, Persian civilization helped shape literature, science, philosophy and political thought across the Mediterranean world, Central Asia and the Indian Ocean basin.

Unlike many later imperial powers whose expansion relied on colonization, resource extraction and the brutal transatlantic slave trade, Persia’s historical influence travelled largely through knowledge, trade and cultural exchange.

This legacy of interaction links Iran not only to Asia but also to Africa.

The Persian Handshake with Africa

Centuries before European colonial powers partitioned the African continent, Persian merchants were already sailing the monsoon winds of the Indian Ocean toward the Swahili coast.

They arrived not as conquerors but as traders, scholars and cultural intermediaries.

From present-day Somalia to Mozambique, Persian traders established networks of commerce and intellectual exchange with the Swahili city-states. Maritime knowledge, architecture, poetry and urban culture travelled across these routes alongside textiles and spices.

The interaction was never one-sided. African societies reshaped and integrated these influences into their own traditions, creating a distinctive Afro-Asian cultural synthesis that still characterizes the region today.

Even the Kiswahili language, rooted in Bantu linguistic traditions, reflects centuries of interaction with Persian and other Indian Ocean cultures.

In this sense, the story of Iran is not distant from Africa—it is intertwined with it.

The Islamic Revolution and the Ethics of Defending the Oppressed

In 1979, Iran once again became the stage for a unique historical transformation.

The Islamic Revolution did not attempt to erase Iran’s ancient past. Instead, it sought to frame a deeply rooted civilization within a moral vision centered on justice, independence and the defense of the oppressed.

Imam Ruhollah Khomeini, the founder of the Islamic Republic, articulated a political philosophy that placed the protection of the Mustazafin—the oppressed and marginalized—at the heart of the revolution’s mission.

One of the most enduring expressions of this principle was his declaration of the last Friday of Ramadan as International Quds Day, inviting people around the world to remember the plight of the Palestinian people.

This ethical perspective continued under the leadership of Ayatollah Sayyid Ali Khamenei, who consistently framed the Palestinian question not merely as a geopolitical dispute but as a matter of moral responsibility and global justice.

For many observers, this unwavering support for Palestinian rights remains one of the central sources of tension between Iran and its adversaries.

Jerusalem: A Sacred City for Humanity

From the perspective of religious scholarship, Jerusalem—known in Arabic as Al-Quds—occupies a unique place in the spiritual geography of humanity.

It is sacred not only to Muslims but also to Christians and Jews.

Within its ancient walls stand some of the most revered sites of the Abrahamic traditions: Al-Aqsa Mosque, the Church of the Holy Sepulcher, and the Western Wall.

For scholars of comparative religion, Jerusalem represents not an exclusive possession but a shared spiritual heritage.

The respected Christian leader Archbishop Desmond Tutu once captured this moral principle in words that resonate across faith traditions:

“If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.”

The Human Question of Self-Defense

Against this historical and moral background, the present conflict raises difficult questions.

Reports from the early days of the war describe devastating strikes, including the bombing of an elementary school in which 168 children between the ages of eight and twelve reportedly lost their lives.

Such tragedies challenge the conscience of the international community.

Under what interpretation of international law can the killing of children be justified?
Under which definition of human rights can such actions be normalized?

History already offers troubling precedents. In Gaza, years of conflict have resulted in the deaths of tens of thousands of civilians.

Yet beyond statistics lies a simple human question.

If the Pope were assassinated in the Vatican, or if your own home were attacked and your father killed before your eyes, would any society remain silent?

Nations, like families, possess a natural instinct for self-defense. When confronted with aggression, the desire to resist is not extremism—it is dignity.

Strategic Consequences beyond Iran

The implications of this confrontation are unlikely to remain confined within Iran’s borders. History repeatedly shows that conflicts ignited in one part of the Middle East rarely remain geographically contained.

Military escalation against a major regional power such as Iran risks widening an already fragile landscape of instability across West Asia.

When the sovereignty of states can be openly violated and civilian infrastructure becomes a battlefield, the consequences rarely stop at a single frontier. They ripple outward—affecting regional security, global diplomacy and the fragile hopes of societies already burdened by decades of conflict.

Africa’s Moral Memory

For Africa, these questions are not abstract. The continent carries its own deep memory of colonial domination, resistance and the struggle for dignity.

The late South African leader Nelson Mandela expressed this moral connection clearly:

“We know too well that our freedom is incomplete without the freedom of the Palestinians.”

Mandela’s words remind us that justice is indivisible.

From Johannesburg to Nairobi, from Tehran to Jerusalem, the principle remains the same: when a people stand against oppression, they defend not only territory but human dignity.

Cultural Expert
Embassy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Abuja, Nigeria

“When two elephants fight, it is the grass that suffers”- The Case of Iran Israel United States Conflict

Continue Reading

Trending

Verified by MonsterInsights