National News
Rep. Ahmed Ja Babawo’s Boko Haram remarks are reckless, demoralising, and dangerous
Rep. Ahmed Ja Babawo’s Boko Haram remarks are reckless, demoralising, and dangerous
By: Zagazola Makama
The recent outburst by Rep. Ahmed Ja Babawo, the Member representing Chibok, Damboa, and Gwoza Federal Constituency in the National Assembly, claiming that Boko Haram is more sophisticated than the Nigerian Army, is not only irresponsible, it is an affront to the gallantry, sacrifices, and resilience of our Armed Forces.
At a time when our soldiers are battling against the most brutal form of asymmetric warfare, it is appalling that a sitting lawmaker would mount the podium of national representation to glorify terrorists and diminish the credibility of Nigeria’s military. In any serious democracy, such inflammatory rhetoric would be met with public censure, if not outright disciplinary measures.
Let us be clear: what Rep. Babawo has done is not advocacy. It is sabotage. He claimed terrorism is “returning to 2014.” Really? In 2014, over 17 local government areas in Borno State were completely overrun. Gwoza, the very heart of his constituency, was declared a “caliphate” by Boko Haram. Tens of thousands were displaced, entire communities levelled, and humanitarian camps stretched to the brink. Those were the days of daily suicide bombings in Maiduguri by Abubakar Shekau, military bases overrun, and territory actually held by terrorists.
That is not today’s reality. Today, none of those librated LGAs are taken back by the terrorists. None. Even the last IDP camp in Maiduguri “Muna” is scheduled to be closed within weeks, According to Governor Babagana Zulum. So far, over two million displaced people have been voluntarily and safely resettled by the Borno State Government, with massive investments in housing, infrastructure, schools, and health centres.
The locations the lawmaker mentioned Sabon Gari, Izge, Wajiroko have not experienced any form of mass displacement. What occurred were isolated, hit-and-run attacks targeting military formations, not civilians. These were tactical ambushes, not territorial seizures. No ground was lost, no civilian communities were overrun, and certainly no LGAs have been displaced. Even the loggers he claimed were slaughtered by Boko Haram, went beyond the parameters set up by the Military in search for firewood which exposed them to attacks.
But to hear Rep. Babawo tell it, Nigeria is once again on the brink of collapse.
This is not just exaggeration; it is a lie. And it is a dangerous one. It insults the blood of our fallen heroes. It diminishes the sweat of our deployed troops. It undermines the faith of our citizens in the very institutions designed to protect them. Worst of all, it gives psychological oxygen to the terrorists we are fighting. It emboldens them. It tells them their tactics are working. Who benefits from such a narrative? Certainly not the Nigerian people. Certainly not the grieving mothers of soldiers who died holding the line. Certainly not the children who now attend schools rebuilt in liberated communities.
The fact is that our troops under Operation Hadin Kai are doing an excellent job in the exceedingly difficult terrain. While the war is far from over, the Armed Forces and the government are still maintaining the momentum. The achievement of the troops of Operation Hadin Kai are vividly illustrated by the neutralization of over 567 terrorists, among them include over 51 top commanders of Boko Haram and ISWAP from February 2024 to date. These targeted assaults coupled with meticulous intelligence gathering resulted in the recovery of 492 assorted weapons, over 10,714 rounds of ammunition, and numerous high value items including general purpose machine guns, rifles, and various explosives.
The success of counter-terrorism activities extended beyond weapon captures. the military rescued over 2,225 civilians from terrorist enclaves. Additionally, more than 9,800 patrols, nearly 2,700 ambushes, and over 990 clearance and offensive operations were carried out, significantly weakening enemy strongholds and restoring safety to the civilian population. Also, through intensive interdiction NAF Air Component operations conducting 232 missions killing hundreds of the insurgents and destroying their logistics across 230 sorties, clocking more than 567 hours of flight time the air component remained a force multiplier in the fight.
Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) played a crucial role; the Nigerian Air Force UAV command executed 760 ISR missions totaling 6,674 flight hours, providing real-time intelligence and enabling precision strikes. This synergy of air and ground operations facilitated the arrest of over 161 terrorists’ logisticians and the surrender of an astounding 200,000 fighters along with their families, which marked a paradigm shift in the theatre’s counter-insurgency efforts.
Other Key activities was the successful conduct of Operation Desert Sanity III, aimed at degrading insurgent networks, coupled with the ongoing efforts in community stabilization. The resettlement of over 4,000 internally displaced persons (IDPs) in Kukawa after successful stabilization operations exemplifies the tangible peace dividends.
Rather than standing on the floor of the National Assembly to push for better soldier welfare, increased military recruitment, or more funding for equipment and surveillance, Rep. Babawo has chosen the path of alarmism. When was the last time he sponsored a bill to improve military pensions? Or advocated for increased defence procurement? Or even visited the frontline to see the real work being done?
In truth, this lawmaker and others like him are not offering solutions. They are offering sensationalism. They prefer soundbites to statecraft. They peddle despair while brave men and women fight daily to bring hope.This trend must end.
National security should never be politicised. Insecurity should never be weaponised for relevance or clout. It is a disservice to the nation, and a betrayal of those who fight in our name.
What is required now is synergy between the military, National Assembly, the police, intelligence agencies, and local authorities. It is the failure of this synergy that has left the Nigerian Army overstretched, deployed to 36 states for duties that ought to be handled by other security agencies. It is not the fault of the military that they are made to respond to every internal threat, no matter how minor. That is a structural problem, not a tactical one.
The Nigerian Police Force must step up. They must be equipped, trained, and repositioned to handle internal security so the military can focus on their primary role. But instead, the military dislodges terrorists, only to be told to “hold the ground” indefinitely, while the civil institutions that should take over are nowhere to be found.
This model is unsustainable. To win this war, we must empower our military, reform our police, and harmonise our security architecture. Governors must also evolve innovative local solutions and ensure good governance that fosters peace.
What we do not need is a politician who sees headlines in the blood of his own people, who shouts fire where there is none, and who declares defeat while our troops continue to win. What happened in Izge was an example. Five terrorists were killed while weapons were recovered but the politicians chose to report that one captain was killed without mentioning the casualties of the terrorists.
The Nigerian Armed Forces are not the enemy. They are the backbone of peace. They are the custodians of our sovereignty. They are the reason Chibok, Damboa, Konduga, Bama, Gwoza and many other LGAs are still standing today. Therefore, to glorify Boko Haram’s “sophistication” over them is not patriotism it is treasonous talk wrapped in cowardice.
This is the time to rally behind our military not ridicule them. This is the time for facts, not fearmongering. And this is the time for lawmakers to act like leaders, not megaphones for terrorists.
The war is not over, but we are not in 2014. Anyone saying otherwise is either ignorant, complicit, or both.
Zagazola Makama is a Counter Insurgency Expert and Security Analyst in the Lake Chad Region.
Rep. Ahmed Ja Babawo’s Boko Haram remarks are reckless, demoralising, and dangerous
National News
Civil Society Groups Slam Tinubu, National Assembly Over Budget Re-enactment, Demand Fiscal Transparency
Civil Society Groups Slam Tinubu, National Assembly Over Budget Re-enactment, Demand Fiscal Transparency
By: Michael Mike
A coalition of Nigerian civil society organisations has accused President Bola Tinubu and the National Assembly of breaching constitutional and fiscal laws through the repeal and re-enactment of the 2024 and 2025 Appropriation Acts, warning that the actions undermine transparency and democratic accountability.
In a statement issued in Abuja, under the platform Nigerian Economy Civil Society Action, the groups described the development as a dangerous abuse of fiscal process, alleging that billions of naira were spent without prior legislative approval.
The organisations expressed outrage that eighteen days after the presentation of the federal executive budget, neither the Budget Office of the Federation nor the National Assembly had made the budget documents publicly available. They said the absence of published budget details prevented citizens from scrutinising government spending and participating meaningfully in the budgeting process.
According to the groups, the situation was worsened by the repeal and re-enactment of the 2024 and 2025 Appropriation Acts without public hearings or access to the revised documents. They argued that the move violated constitutional provisions which require legislative approval before any public funds are expended.
The coalition noted that the 2024 Appropriation Act, which originally expired at the end of December 2024, was controversially extended by the National Assembly to mid-2025 and later to December 2025. They alleged that despite the extensions, the executive failed to implement the budget as approved before seeking to repeal and re-enact it with an increased expenditure figure, raising the total budget size from ₦35.05 trillion to ₦43.56 trillion.
Describing the process as unprecedented, the groups argued that increasing a budget after its lifespan had ended had no basis in Nigerian law. They maintained that the spending of additional public funds without prior authorisation amounted to a constitutional violation, noting that Nigeria was not operating under a declared fiscal emergency at the time.
On the 2025 budget, the organisations faulted the decision to revise expenditure figures at the end of the fiscal year rather than through a mid-year review, which they said is the globally accepted practice. They rejected claims by the National Assembly that the repeal and re-enactment were intended to align Nigeria’s budgeting process with international best practices.
The groups cited provisions of the Constitution and the Fiscal Responsibility Act which mandate transparency, legislative oversight, and public disclosure of government financial decisions. They said the continued refusal to publish budget documents violated these laws and eroded public trust.
As part of their demands, the civil society organisations called on the National Assembly to halt all unappropriated spending, warning that such actions could constitute grounds for impeachment. They also demanded a firm commitment from the President to comply strictly with constitutional spending limits.
The coalition further urged the immediate publication of the 2026 budget estimates and the re-enacted 2024 and 2025 Appropriation Acts on official government platforms, alongside renewed guarantees of citizen participation in fiscal decision-making.
The statement was jointly signed by the Centre for Social Justice, Africa Network for Environment and Economic Justice, Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre, BudgIT, PRIMORG, PLSI and other advocacy groups.
Civil Society Groups Slam Tinubu, National Assembly Over Budget Re-enactment, Demand Fiscal Transparency
National News
UN Urges Nigerian Authorities to Protect Civilians, Schools After Fresh Niger State Attacks
UN Urges Nigerian Authorities to Protect Civilians, Schools After Fresh Niger State Attacks
By: Michael Mike
The United Nations has called on Nigerian authorities to urgently strengthen the protection of civilians and educational institutions following a wave of violent attacks in Niger State and neighbouring areas that left dozens of people dead and many others abducted.
The UN Resident and Humanitarian Coordinator in Nigeria, Mohamed Fall, issued the appeal after assailants attacked a crowded market in Kasuwan Daji, Borgu Local Government Area of Niger State on January 3.
Reports indicate that more than 30 people were killed in the attack, while an undetermined number of victims were taken away by the attackers. Market stalls and residential buildings were also torched during the raid.
Security incidents were also reported in Agwara Local Government Area of Niger State, as well as in parts of Kwara and Ondo states, with casualties including deaths and kidnappings. The renewed violence has heightened fears among residents already grappling with prolonged insecurity across the region.
Agwara local government area has remained a flashpoint for attacks on civilian targets. In November 2025, armed groups abducted more than 300 people during an assault on Saint Mary’s Catholic School in the area. Although the victims were later released, the incident drew national and international condemnation and renewed attention to the vulnerability of schools in conflict-affected communities.
Describing the recent attacks as serious violations of human rights, the UN official stressed that assaults on civilians, particularly women and children, erode the right to life and disrupt access to education. He warned that continued attacks on schools threaten children’s safety and undermine efforts to keep them in classrooms.
The United Nations extended condolences to families who lost relatives in the attacks and wished those injured a speedy recovery. It also called for the immediate release of all abducted persons and urged Nigerian authorities to ensure that those responsible are brought to justice in line with national and international legal standards.
Reaffirming its stance on education in emergencies, the UN reminded Nigeria of its commitment to the Safe Schools Declaration, which aims to protect schools from military use and violent attacks. The organisation noted that recent incidents highlight the urgent need to translate these commitments into concrete action.
The UN said it remains ready to work with federal and state authorities to improve civilian protection and promote safer learning environments amid Nigeria’s ongoing security challenges.
UN Urges Nigerian Authorities to Protect Civilians, Schools After Fresh Niger State Attacks
National News
Nigeria Faces Rising Cocaine and Heroin Trafficking from Brazil and Europe
Nigeria Faces Rising Cocaine and Heroin Trafficking from Brazil and Europe
By: Zagazola Makama
Nigeria is increasingly facing a severe public security challenge as Brazilian hard drugs, particularly cocaine and heroin, continue to inundate the country’s ports, airports, and border corridors. The recent case of the Brazilian vessel MV San Antonio, intercepted at Apapa Port in Lagos carrying 25.5 kilograms of cocaine, is emblematic of a broader trend of transnational drug trafficking that links Latin American production hubs to West African transit zones and ultimately to European consumer markets.
This phenomenon is neither isolated nor new, but rather a symptom of systemic weaknesses in global and regional law enforcement, as well as Nigeria’s strategic vulnerabilities. The movement of Brazilian cocaine into Nigeria is facilitated by highly sophisticated criminal networks, often led by organized syndicates such as the Primeiro Comando da Capital (PCC). This group, historically rooted in Brazil, has expanded its reach globally, leveraging logistical expertise, clandestine shipping routes, and advanced concealment methods to circumvent law enforcement.
In the MV San Antonio case, cocaine was hidden within a bulk sugar consignment, a method indicative of meticulous planning and an understanding of Nigeria’s import screening vulnerabilities. Such concealment illustrates the deliberate targeting of legitimate trade routes, which are difficult to monitor comprehensively due to high volumes of maritime traffic, understaffed customs units, and limited technological infrastructure.
It was revealed that these criminal networks operate through a complex value chain. The networks rely on intermediaries, “couriers,” and complicit port operators to facilitate the movement of narcotics from production centers in Brazil to consumer markets in Europe. Nigeria’s status as a populous West African nation with busy ports and an extensive informal economy makes it a particularly attractive node for transshipment.
Cocaine trafficking between Brazil and West Africa stretches back to at least three decade, Initially, West Africa played a minor role in the global cocaine trade, serving as a peripheral transit point. However, as cocaine cultivation in South America surged and European consumption increased, West African ports became strategic nodes.
Data show that by 2019, Nigeria, Ghana, and Sierra Leone had become prominent transit points for cocaine seized in Brazil. In 2021 alone, cultivation in Latin America reached record levels, and West Africa witnessed unprecedented seizures amounting to 24 tonnes, reflecting both the scale of trafficking and the intensification of smuggling efforts through the region. Intelligence indicates that traffickers exploit weak regulatory oversight, porous borders, and high demand in Europe to ensure a continuous flow of narcotics into the region.
The inflow of Brazilian hard drugs into Nigeria has profound security, economic, and social ramifications: The illicit trade fuels organized crime, armed gangs, and violent conflicts across Nigeria. Groups involved in smuggling often engage in kidnapping, terrorism, armed robbery, and inter-gang rivalries, contributing to the insecurity in the country. Drug proceeds are also frequently laundered through Nigeria’s informal economy and eventually funneled into formal financial institutions, undermining financial integrity and facilitating other criminal enterprises.
The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and ECOWAS have highlighted the nexus between drug trafficking and money laundering as a critical risk to economic stability. Increasing availability of cocaine and heroin exposes young people to addiction and associated social pathologies. Nigeria’s youth, particularly in coastal and urban areas, are highly vulnerable due to unemployment, weak social safety nets, and peer influence. The involvement of foreign vessels and nationals complicates enforcement and prosecution, potentially creating diplomatic tensions if due process is not meticulously followed. The reliance on multi-agency collaboration, including customs, NDLEA, and police, is essential but often hindered by bureaucratic inefficiencies.
Despite notable seizures like that of the MV San Antonio and airport arrests of Brazil-returnees concealing heroin and cocaine, systemic weaknesses persist: Apapa Port and Murtala Muhammed International Airport remain high-risk entry points due to inadequate scanning technology, insufficient manpower, and procedural bottlenecks. Smugglers exploit these gaps with increasingly sophisticated concealment methods. While intelligence-led operations have improved, Nigerian agencies still face challenges in real-time monitoring, cross-border data sharing, and predictive threat analysis.
Prosecuting transnational cases involves navigating complex legal frameworks, multiple jurisdictions, and ensuring adherence to human rights standards, especially for foreign nationals. The need for continued detention, as granted in the MV San Antonio case, illustrates both the procedural complexities and the necessity for investigative thoroughness.
The influx of Brazilian cocaine and heroin into Nigeria is a multidimensional threat, combining criminal sophistication, systemic vulnerabilities, and socio-economic consequences. The MV San Antonio seizure and similar interdictions draws attention to the gains of intelligence-led enforcement but also the urgent need for sustained investment in technology, regional collaboration, and strategic policy interventions.
Failure to act decisively risks entrenching Nigeria as a permanent hub for international drug trafficking, exacerbating violence, undermining economic stability, and threatening public health. Conversely, coordinated, evidence-based, and proactive measures can transform Nigeria from a vulnerable transit point into a resilient bulwark against the global narcotics trade.
Nigeria’s fight against transnational drug trafficking is not just a law enforcement challenge, it is a test of national governance, regional cooperation, and the country’s commitment to protecting its citizens and youth from the destructive consequences of illicit drugs.
Nigeria Faces Rising Cocaine and Heroin Trafficking from Brazil and Europe
-
News2 years agoRoger Federer’s Shock as DNA Results Reveal Myla and Charlene Are Not His Biological Children
-
Opinions4 years agoTHE PLIGHT OF FARIDA
-
News9 months agoFAILED COUP IN BURKINA FASO: HOW TRAORÉ NARROWLY ESCAPED ASSASSINATION PLOT AMID FOREIGN INTERFERENCE CLAIMS
-
Opinions4 years agoPOLICE CHARGE ROOMS, A MINTING PRESS
-
News2 years agoEYN: Rev. Billi, Distortion of History, and The Living Tamarind Tree
-
ACADEMICS2 years agoA History of Biu” (2015) and The Lingering Bura-Pabir Question (1)
-
Columns2 years agoArmy University Biu: There is certain interest, but certainly not from Borno.
-
Opinions2 years agoTinubu,Shettima: The epidemic of economic, insecurity in Nigeria
