News
U.S. Supreme Court to hear argument on Biden immigration enforcement policy
U.S. Supreme Court to hear argument on Biden immigration enforcement policy
The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday is set to consider whether President Joe Biden’s administration can implement guidelines challenged by two conservative-leaning states of shifting immigration enforcement toward public safety threats.
This the court said in a case testing executive branch power to set enforcement priorities.
The justices will hear the administration’s bid to overturn a judge’s ruling in favor of Texas and Louisiana that vacated U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) guidelines narrowing the scope of those who can be targeted by immigration agents for arrest and deportation.
The Democratic president’s policy departed from the hard-line approach of his Republican predecessor, Donald Trump, who sought to broaden the range of immigrants subject to arrest and removal.
Biden campaigned on a more humane approach to immigration but has been faced with large numbers of migrants crossing the U.S.-Mexico border.
The guidelines, announced by Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas in September 2021, prioritised apprehending and deporting non-U.S. citizens who pose a threat to national security, public safety or border security.
In a memo, Mayorkas called the guidelines necessary because his department lacks the resources to apprehend and seek the removal of every one of the estimated 11 million immigrants living in the United States illegally.
Mayorkas cited the longstanding practice of government officials exercising discretion to decide who should be subject to deportation and said that a majority of immigrants subject to deportation “have been contributing members of our communities for years.’’
Biden’s administration, saying fewer detentions and deportations have encouraged more illegal border crossings.
The top Republican in the U.S. House of Representatives, Kevin McCarthy, earlier called on Mayorkas to step down and said the House may try to impeach him when Republicans formally take control of the chamber in January.
Republican state attorneys general in Texas and Louisiana sued to block the guidelines after Republican-led legal challenges successfully thwarted other Biden administration attempts to ease enforcement.
Their lawsuit, filed in Texas, argued that the guidelines ran counter to provisions in immigration laws that makes it mandatory to detain non-U.S. citizens who have been convicted of certain crimes or have final orders of removal.
U.S. District Judge Drew Tipton, a Trump appointee, ruled in favor of the challengers, finding that while immigration agents could on a case-by-case basis act with discretion the administration’s guidelines were a generalised policy that contravened the detention mandate set out by Congress.
“Whatever the outer limits of its authority, the executive branch does not have the authority to change the law,’’ Tipton wrote.
After the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in July declined to put that ruling on hold, Biden’s administration turned to the Supreme Court.
The justices on a 5-4 vote declined to stay Tipton’s ruling, with conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett joining liberal justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson in dissent. The justices did not provide reasons for their disagreement.
Biden’s administration has told the Supreme Court that Texas and Louisiana lack the proper legal standing to challenge the guidelines because the states had not suffered any direct harm as a result of the policy.
The states countered that they would be harmed by having to spend more money on law enforcement and social services as a result of an increase in non-U.S. citizens present within their borders due to the guidelines.
The administration also told the justices that the guidelines do not violate federal immigration law and that the mandatory language of those statutes does not supersede the longstanding principle of law enforcement discretion.
A decision is expected by the end of June.
News
Nigeria Moves to Reinforce Global Diplomatic Presence with Deployment of 25 Ambassadors
Nigeria Moves to Reinforce Global Diplomatic Presence with Deployment of 25 Ambassadors
By: Michael Mike
Nigeria is poised to deepen its diplomatic footprint worldwide as the Federal Government concludes arrangements to deploy a new batch of 25 ambassadors to strategic missions abroad, marking a significant step in the country’s renewed foreign policy drive.
The spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Kimiebi Ebienfa, disclosed this on Friday in Abuja while briefing journalists on key developments within the ministry and Nigeria’s ongoing diplomatic engagements.
He revealed that the process has advanced considerably, with the government already securing over 25 formal acceptances—known in diplomatic circles as agrément—from host countries. The approvals signal that the receiving nations have completed due diligence and formally consented to the appointment of Nigeria’s nominees.
Describing the development as a critical milestone, Ebienfa announced that a high-level induction programme for the envoys has been scheduled to hold from April 26 to 29, 2026. He said the exercise would serve as a strategic orientation platform, preparing the ambassadors for the complex demands of representing Nigeria’s interests abroad.
“We have received more than 25 agreements from countries where ambassador-designates have been sent. With the induction programme scheduled for later this month, deployment will commence immediately after the exercise,” he stated.
According to him, the induction will go beyond ceremonial briefings, focusing on the practical realities of modern diplomacy, including bilateral engagement strategies, conduct and protocol in host countries, economic diplomacy, and alignment with Nigeria’s foreign policy priorities under President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.
He added that, in line with diplomatic tradition, spouses of the envoys would also participate in aspects of the programme, reflecting their supportive role in representing the country’s image and values overseas.
While most of the ambassador-designates are expected to proceed to their duty posts immediately after the induction, Ebienfa noted that a few postings may still be subject to final administrative clearances.
He noted that even if any of the ambassador-designates is rejected by the country to which he or she is posted, there is still room for reassignment to another country.
The imminent deployment is seen as a decisive move by the Federal Government to revitalise Nigeria’s diplomatic architecture, strengthen bilateral and multilateral ties, and position the country more assertively on the global stage amid shifting geopolitical and economic realities.
Nigeria Moves to Reinforce Global Diplomatic Presence with Deployment of 25 Ambassadors
News
FG Cracks Down on Fake Ambassadors, Criminalises Unauthorised Use of Diplomatic Titles
FG Cracks Down on Fake Ambassadors, Criminalises Unauthorised Use of Diplomatic Titles
By: Michael Mike
The Federal Government has moved decisively to protect the sanctity of Nigeria’s diplomatic system, declaring the unauthorised use of ambassadorial titles a criminal offence punishable under the law.
Raising alarm over what it described as a disturbing rise in impersonation and fraudulent conferment of diplomatic ranks, the spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Kimiebi Ebienfa, said the development has exposed the country to reputational risks and international embarrassment.
Speaking in Abuja on Friday, Ebienfa warned that only the President, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, possesses the constitutional authority to appoint and accredit ambassadors, stressing that any individual or group claiming otherwise is acting illegally.
He described as “worrisome” the activities of unscrupulous persons and organisations that confer ambassadorial titles on themselves or unsuspecting members of the public, often for financial gain or social influence.
According to him, such practices have no basis in Nigerian law or international diplomatic conventions and amount to outright impersonation.
“The Ministry has observed with grave concern the increasing trend of individuals usurping diplomatic titles and fraudulently presenting themselves as ambassadors. These actions are illegal and undermine the credibility of Nigeria’s foreign representation,” he said.
Ebienfa listed common violations to include the unauthorised use of titles such as “Ambassador” and “Diplomatic Envoy,” the issuance of fake diplomatic passports and identity cards, as well as the circulation of counterfeit vehicle plate numbers bearing official insignia.
He cautioned Nigerians against accepting such titles from unofficial bodies, warning that those who parade themselves as ambassadors based on such conferment are committing a criminal offence and risk prosecution.
In a key clarification, the ministry noted that while individuals may be appointed as brand ambassadors for commercial or promotional purposes, such recognition does not confer any legal or diplomatic status.
“Brand ambassadors remain what they are—representatives of products or services. They are not entitled to adopt or prefix the title ‘Ambassador’ to their names in a diplomatic sense,” he emphasised.
To enforce compliance, Ebienfa disclosed that the ministry is working closely with relevant security and regulatory agencies, including the Nigerian Immigration Service and the Federal Road Safety Corps, to identify, arrest, and prosecute offenders. The crackdown will also target the production and use of fake diplomatic documents and unauthorised number plates.
He reaffirmed the government’s commitment to preserving the integrity of Nigeria’s diplomatic service, warning that any act capable of misrepresenting the country on the global stage will not be tolerated.
“The Federal Government will continue to take firm actions against individuals or groups whose activities bring Nigeria into disrepute. The integrity of our diplomatic system is non-negotiable,” he said.
FG Cracks Down on Fake Ambassadors, Criminalises Unauthorised Use of Diplomatic Titles
News
Nigeria Accelerates Peace Reform Drive as Stakeholders Push for Adoption of National Peace Policy
Nigeria Accelerates Peace Reform Drive as Stakeholders Push for Adoption of National Peace Policy
By: Michael Mike
Nigeria has intensified efforts to establish a unified national framework for peacebuilding as top security and governance stakeholders convened in Abuja for the Second High-Level Expert Dialogue on the Draft National Peace Policy (NPP), aimed at overhauling the country’s fragmented conflict management system.
The dialogue, convened by the Institute for Peace and Conflict Resolution (IPCR) in partnership with the Office of Strategic Preparedness and Resilience (OSPRE) and Triple Peace Africa, brought together policymakers, security experts, academics, civil society leaders, and development partners to refine and advance the proposed national framework.
Opening discussions, the Director-General of IPCR, Dr. Joseph Ochogwu, said Nigeria’s worsening and interconnected security challenges make the adoption of a coherent peace policy both urgent and unavoidable.
He pointed to the persistence of insurgency in the Northeast, farmer-herder conflicts in the Northcentral, separatist tensions in the Southeast, and widespread banditry and kidnapping in the Northwest, warning that the cumulative impact of these crises continues to strain national cohesion.

According to him, the spread of small arms, coupled with weakening trust between communities and institutions, has further deepened insecurity and undermined local resilience mechanisms.
Ochogwu stressed that Nigeria can no longer depend on scattered and uncoordinated interventions, insisting that only a unified, evidence-driven framework can deliver sustainable peace outcomes.
“What we require now is a nationally owned system that coordinates all peacebuilding actors, eliminates duplication, and ensures that interventions are measurable, accountable, and impactful at community level,” he said.
He explained that the Draft National Peace Policy is the outcome of extensive nationwide consultations spanning all six geopolitical zones, incorporating input from traditional rulers, civil society organisations, academic experts, government institutions, and community stakeholders.
Describing the document as a strategic shift in approach, he said the policy is designed to reposition peacebuilding from reactive crisis response to a preventive and development-oriented system anchored on data, early warning, and institutional coordination.
A major gap the policy seeks to address, he noted, is the absence of a central coordinating structure for peace initiatives across the country, a situation he said has resulted in duplication of efforts, institutional competition, and inefficient use of resources.
The proposed framework, he added, will integrate peacebuilding into core sectors including security, justice, education, health, agriculture, and governance, ensuring a whole-of-government approach to conflict prevention and stability.
Ochogwu further highlighted that the policy aligns with global and regional frameworks such as the United Nations Sustaining Peace Agenda, the Sustainable Development Goals—particularly SDG 16 on peace, justice and strong institutions—the African Union’s Agenda 2063, and the ECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework.
He said this alignment reinforces Nigeria’s commitment to international best practices while positioning the country as a potential leader in structured peacebuilding across Africa.
Participants at the dialogue emphasised that the success of the policy will depend on strong political will, clear institutional roles, sustainable financing mechanisms, and effective coordination across all levels of government.

They warned that without decisive implementation structures, the policy risks becoming another well-crafted but inactive document.
Ochogwu urged stakeholders to take collective responsibility for the process, describing them as critical actors in shaping Nigeria’s peace architecture and cautioning against institutional silos that weaken national response systems.
He reaffirmed IPCR’s readiness to work with federal and state governments, peacebuilding agencies, civil society organisations, the private sector, and international partners to ensure the policy is finalised, adopted, and implemented without delay.
He maintained that Nigeria’s stability depends on deliberate and coordinated action, stressing that the time for policy adoption and implementation is now.
Analysts say the push for a National Peace Policy could mark a turning point in Nigeria’s conflict management strategy, shifting the country from reactive security responses to a more structured, preventive, and sustainable peace framework.
Nigeria Accelerates Peace Reform Drive as Stakeholders Push for Adoption of National Peace Policy
-
News2 years agoRoger Federer’s Shock as DNA Results Reveal Myla and Charlene Are Not His Biological Children
-
Opinions4 years agoTHE PLIGHT OF FARIDA
-
News12 months agoFAILED COUP IN BURKINA FASO: HOW TRAORÉ NARROWLY ESCAPED ASSASSINATION PLOT AMID FOREIGN INTERFERENCE CLAIMS
-
News2 years agoEYN: Rev. Billi, Distortion of History, and The Living Tamarind Tree
-
Opinions4 years agoPOLICE CHARGE ROOMS, A MINTING PRESS
-
ACADEMICS2 years agoA History of Biu” (2015) and The Lingering Bura-Pabir Question (1)
-
Columns2 years agoArmy University Biu: There is certain interest, but certainly not from Borno.
-
Opinions2 years agoTinubu,Shettima: The epidemic of economic, insecurity in Nigeria
