Politics
2027: Will a potential leadership swap be the case for Senator Abubakar Kyari in Borno?
2027: Will a potential leadership swap be the case for Senator Abubakar Kyari in Borno?
By: Dr. James Bwala
Senator Abubakar Kyari, currently serving as the Minister of Agriculture, is leaving an indelible mark on Nigeria’s agricultural sector. He has championed initiatives aimed at enhancing food security and ensuring self-sufficiency. Kyari’s policies have included programs to provide farmers with access to technology, financial assistance, and training—critical elements that empower rural communities. With agriculture as the backbone of Borno’s economy, Kyari’s experience could be instrumental in furthering Zulum’s vision for the state if he emerges as the next governor. Echoes in Borno suggest that for the state to thrive post-2027, a collaborative approach that combines the strengths of both Zulum and Kyari may be necessary. Should they decide to exchange roles, the transition would be smoother, as both are committed to the same overarching goal: the revitalization of Borno’s economy through agricultural reform and infrastructural development.
Zulum’s governance has already laid a robust foundation for agricultural growth, but the complexities involved in managing agricultural reform require a leader like Kyari, who has extensive experience navigating federal-level policies and initiatives. His role as the Minister of Agriculture means he has acquired a wealth of knowledge regarding agricultural best practices, access to funding, and partnerships that could be invaluable for Borno’s development. Agriculture is not just vital for sustenance in Borno; it is a linchpin for broader economic stability. The ongoing crisis in the region has significantly impacted farming activities, leading to food insecurity and high unemployment rates. By leveraging Kyari’s expertise and Zulum’s local knowledge and commitment, a leadership swap could allow for an innovative agricultural roadmap tailored to the unique challenges faced by Borno.
READ ALSO: https://newsng.ng/2027-is-senator-kaka-shehu-lawan-the-right-choice-for-borno/
Senator Abubakar Kyari’s initiatives have consistently emphasized modern farming techniques, crop diversification, and sustainable practices that could enhance productivity in Borno’s primarily subsistence farming. With Zulum’s focus on infrastructure improvements, such as roads and irrigation systems, Kyari continuing in the steps of Zulum could create an enabling environment for farmers, ensuring that they can efficiently bring their products to market. A key tenet of Kyari’s approach has been empowering farmers through technology and resources. Should Kyari take on the role of governor, he could implement large-scale programs designed to introduce advanced farming technologies, thus improving yields and reducing losses caused by pests and unpredictable weather patterns. For instance, utilizing data analytics and remote sensing technology can help farmers better understand weather patterns, optimize planting schedules, and manage crops more effectively. Also, Kyari’s insights into financial assistance programs could facilitate greater access to credit for farmers in Borno. This could alleviate one of the major barriers to agricultural investment, allowing farmers to acquire the necessary tools and inputs to enhance production and, therefore, increasingly contribute to the local economy.
While the prospect of a leadership swap may seem advantageous from an operational standpoint, the political dynamics within Borno State must also be considered. Both Zulum and Kyari have established significant political capital and support bases. Their alignment on critical issues can help unify their supporters and facilitate effective governance. Politics in Nigeria is often fraught with challenges, including party loyalties and factionalism. A seamless transition of power between Zulum and Kyari could send a powerful message about cooperation and shared goals, potentially fostering a more stable political environment in Borno. This stability would be crucial for attracting investment and partnerships necessary for economic growth.
As 2027 approaches, it is imperative for both leaders to articulate their visions for Borno. A partnership built on mutual respect and a common purpose can galvanize support from the populace, investors, and international aid organizations. Whether Kyari remains in his ministerial role or assumes the governorship, a strategic alignment with Zulum ensures that the innovative agricultural reforms initiated under his ministry can continue to flourish. In addition to agriculture, the synergy between these two leaders could also extend to other sectors, including education and healthcare. A well-rounded approach that addresses multiple facets of community life will ultimately yield the highest dividends for the people of Borno.
READ ALSO: https://newsng.ng/2027-is-senator-kaka-shehu-lawan-the-right-choice-for-borno/
While supporters laud Kyari’s reputation as a diligent public servant. Comments on the Borno social media platform challenge his commitment to the welfare of his constituents. Critics assert that his ministerial role has distanced him from grassroots issues, thereby limiting his grasp of local needs. However, despite these criticisms, Kyari’s wealth of experience in governance, epitomized through his various roles within both legislative and executive arms of government, positions him uniquely in the political arena in Borno. Indeed, one of the most significant aspects of Kyari’s public persona is his established reputation as a dedicated public servant. His diligence is reflected in his numerous positions within the government. From a member of the House of Representatives to a senator in the red chamber, and further to his roles as a commissioner, chief of staff, and currently, a minister, Kyari’s journey through various levels of governance has endowed him with a rich tapestry of experience that few can rival. This extensive exposure provides him with insights into the intricacies of political processes and the frameworks necessary for effective governance.
Supporters often cite his track record in addressing critical issues affecting his constituents as a testament to his effectiveness, but critics think otherwise. For instance, during his tenure in the National Assembly, Kyari was known for advocating policies aimed at enhancing local infrastructure and improving educational facilities. His involvement on various committees allowed him to champion projects that directly impacted the welfare of his constituents. This reputation as a diligent public servant resonates with the ethos appeal in political communication—the belief that he genuinely cares about the people he represents.
However, the criticisms leveled against him cannot be overlooked. Detractors argue that the elevation of Kyari to ministerial positions may have inadvertently distanced him from the grassroots realities experienced by the people he seeks to serve. They contend that engaging in high-level discussions and decision-making in the capital can lead to a disconnect from the day-to-day challenges facing individuals in Borno. Critics suggest that such detachment could stifle his ability to accurately address the nuanced needs of his constituents. The pathos appeal is evident here; there exists an emotional undertone in these arguments suggesting that true leadership lies in the ability to empathize with and respond to the immediate concerns of the populace.
READ ALSO: https://newsng.ng/2027-is-senator-kaka-shehu-lawan-the-right-choice-for-borno/
Nevertheless, it is crucial to recognize that governance, especially in a nation as diverse as Nigeria, requires a delicate balance between high-level policymaking and grassroots engagement. Kyari’s extensive experience across various levels of government could render him particularly adept at bridging these two worlds. His understanding of the bureaucratic machinery and his strategic approach to governance could facilitate the implementation of solutions that resonate with both policymakers and the affected communities. With a reputation built on both ethos and logos, Kyari may possess the capacity to analyze issues critically and formulate effective responses.
His wealth of experience allows him to draw upon a robust network of contacts and resources, which can be vital for addressing local issues more effectively. His established relationships within both governmental and party structures can often expedite project approvals and financial allocations to the local level. This intersection of experience and connections reinforces the argument that he may indeed be capable of addressing local needs even from a distance. In addition, the perspectives of the people in Borno—often called the grassroots—provide incredible insights into Kyari’s influence. He has managed to maintain a bond with his constituents, who speak highly of him across various platforms. The rhetorical strategies he employs often appeal to the values and aspirations of these constituents, resonating deeply with their experiences and hopes for progress. Such engagement is necessary for any leader aspiring to mobilize support for initiatives that enhance community welfare. The people of Northern Borno especially see in him a reflection of their struggles, aspirations, and resiliency, making him an integral part of their political narrative and identity.
As we examine Senator Kyari’s trajectory and the surrounding discourse, it becomes clear that positioning him as the potential “Messiah” of Borno politics is not without its complexities. While critics voice legitimate concerns regarding his potential disconnect from grassroots issues, it is equally essential to acknowledge the transformative potential of experienced leaders in navigating the labyrinth of governance. Kyari’s journey suggests that while he may face challenges comprehensively understanding everyday concerns, his extensive experience endows him with tools to devise solutions that transcend individual issues. This moment in Borno politics calls for leaders who can synthesize their experiences into actionable policies that resonate with the needs of the people. In a nation grappling with multifaceted challenges—from education and healthcare to security and economic development—leaders like Kyari, who straddle the divide between policy and practice, are invaluable. The question remains whether he can harness his experience and public support to advocate effectively for the needs of his people, thus fulfilling the expectations set before him.
READ ALSO: https://newsng.ng/2027-is-senator-kaka-shehu-lawan-the-right-choice-for-borno/
The notion of waiting for another “Messiah” for Borno remains a poignant consideration. While the allure of new political figures often offers hope, the reality is that transformative change often comes from leaders already entrenched in the system. Kyari’s depth of experience positions him uniquely not only to understand the challenges facing the people of Borno but also to navigate the intricate power dynamics at play in achieving meaningful change. The blending of historical context, present challenges, and future aspirations creates a compelling case for his potential leadership.
* James Bwala, PhD, writes from Abuja.
2027: Will a potential leadership swap be the case for Senator Abubakar Kyari in Borno?
Politics
ADC Declares Itself ‘Unstoppable Force,’ Accuses APC, INEC of Undermining Democracy
ADC Declares Itself ‘Unstoppable Force,’ Accuses APC, INEC of Undermining Democracy
By: Michael Mike
The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has declared itself an unstoppable political force, likening its rise to the certainty of the sun, while launching a scathing attack on the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) over what it described as growing threats to Nigeria’s democracy.
In its Secretariat report presented by the National Secretary of the party, lOgbeni Rauf Aregbesola
at the party’s 8th National Convention in Abuja on Tuesday, the ADC said no individual, group, or institution could determine its existence, insisting that its legitimacy stems from the will of Nigerians.
The party stressed that it was founded on constitutional guarantees of freedom of association and is driven by what it called widespread public frustration with economic hardship and governance failures.
Describing its mission as a “national rescue effort,” the ADC accused the APC-led administration of presiding over worsening economic conditions, including currency depreciation, rising fuel prices, and declining living standards.
According to the report, the naira’s fall from about N700 to the dollar in 2023 to roughly N1,400 currently represents a severe blow to an import-dependent economy. It also cited the sharp rise in petrol prices—from below N238 per litre to about N1,400—as a major driver of hardship, making transportation unaffordable for many workers.
The party further criticised the government’s handling of electricity supply, alleging that power conditions have deteriorated, with some areas receiving only a few hours of electricity daily.
On governance, the ADC used strong language, warning against what it described as “kakistocracy,” and accused the ruling party of attempting to weaken electoral accountability. It also faulted the administration’s education record, claiming the number of out-of-school children has increased to about 20 million, while multidimensional poverty affects over 130 million Nigerians.
The report argued that the current administration had failed to meet key promises and should be held accountable by voters.
The ADC also accused INEC of failing in its statutory duty by refusing to monitor its convention, describing the move as “dereliction of duty” and evidence of partisan bias.
Citing provisions of the Electoral Act, the party maintained that the commission is legally required to observe political party conventions, especially those involving leadership elections, candidate selection, or merger decisions.
It warned that any attempt to delegitimise its activities would undermine democratic norms and called on the international community to closely monitor developments in Nigeria’s political space.
Despite the tensions, the ADC expressed confidence in its growth, claiming it has rapidly evolved into a major opposition force within months of restructuring and coalition-building efforts.
The party reaffirmed its readiness to contest and provide leadership ahead of the 2027 general elections, urging Nigerians to support what it described as a movement to reclaim the country.
ADC Declares Itself ‘Unstoppable Force,’ Accuses APC, INEC of Undermining Democracy
Politics
2027: Of Shettima’s remarks And Atiku’s response
2027: Of Shettima’s remarks And Atiku’s response
By: Dr. James Bwala
I believe that interactions among top leaders often attract intense scrutiny and can influence public perception considerably. A recent episode involving former Vice President Atiku Abubakar and current Vice President Kashim Shettima provides a compelling case study on the intersection of respect, cultural values, and political discourse. Atiku’s claim of refusal to engage publicly with Kashim, labeling him as disrespectful, juxtaposed with Kashim’s assertion that his comments were merely political challenges devoid of personal offense, raises essential questions about the nature of respect in politics, especially within the cultural context of Northern Nigeria.
While respect and decorum are foundational values, particularly in traditional societies, political engagement demands a distinct understanding where robust debate and challenge are not only expected but necessary. Atiku, given his extensive experience, should recognize this distinction and refrain from conflating political contestation with personal disrespect.
READ ALSO: https://newsng.ng/2027-ishaya-malgwi-does-not-reflect-the-sentiments-or-intentions-of-northern-leadership-nor-the-stance-of-vice-president-kashim-shettima/
It is critical first to understand the cultural backdrop against which these statements were made. Northern Nigerian society places immense importance on respect, especially towards elders and those who hold traditional authority. In this context, respect is not merely a social nicety but a fundamental principle that preserves societal harmony and upholds long-standing customs. Atiku’s appeal to this cultural framework underscores a genuine concern for maintaining decorum in public discourse, reflecting a desire to keep political rivalry within respectful bounds. His position resonates with many who believe that politics should not erode the basic tenets of interpersonal respect that unify communities.
However, it is equally important to recognize that political arenas operate under somewhat different norms than traditional social settings. Politics inherently involves contestation, negotiation, and at times, confrontation. Public figures, especially those in leadership roles, are expected to engage vigorously with criticism and challenges, understanding that these encounters are part of the democratic process. VP Kashim Shettima’s response — framing his remarks as a call for transparency and accountability rather than a personal affront — exemplifies this political dynamic. In politics, questioning an opponent’s record or demanding clarification is not an act of disrespect but a fundamental exercise of democratic engagement designed to inform the electorate and hold leaders accountable.
READ ALSO: https://newsng.ng/2027-ishaya-malgwi-does-not-reflect-the-sentiments-or-intentions-of-northern-leadership-nor-the-stance-of-vice-president-kashim-shettima/
Atiku’s stance, which carefully separates political platforms from traditional ones, inadvertently blurs an important line. While it is true that traditional platforms emphasize honor and respect toward elders, contemporary political platforms must prioritize open dialogue and constructive criticism. By conflating the two realms, Atiku risks imposing cultural expectations that do not fully apply in the political sphere, which may inhibit honest debate. This conflation can be detrimental, as it discourages politicians from engaging transparently, fearing accusations of disrespect rather than focusing on the substance of their arguments.
Atiku’s considerable experience in Nigerian politics should provide him with a nuanced understanding of political etiquette—one that balances respect with the necessity for outspoken, even pointed, political discourse. Public officeholders should anticipate and accept challenges from their peers without interpreting them as personal attacks. VP Kashim Shettima’s comments, which called upon Atiku to specify his claims on mentorship of men in certain numbers, are a standard political maneuver aimed at fostering clarity and accountability. Such engagements are vital to democracy and should be welcomed rather than rebuffed.
READ ALSO: https://newsng.ng/2027-ishaya-malgwi-does-not-reflect-the-sentiments-or-intentions-of-northern-leadership-nor-the-stance-of-vice-president-kashim-shettima/
It is also worth considering the potential consequences of Atiku’s refusal to engage politically with Kashim Shettima. When senior politicians avoid direct discourse citing disrespect, it sets a precedent that political opponents cannot challenge each other robustly without incurring accusations of impropriety. This could stifle political debate, limit the electorate’s access to contrasting views, and ultimately weaken the democratic process. Healthy democracies thrive on transparent discussions where candidates and leaders openly articulate their policies, question one another’s records, and clarify positions without fear of personal reprisal.
Indeed, Kashim Shettima’s acknowledgment that his remarks were political rather than personal reflects a mature understanding of political culture. It signals a willingness to engage in substantive debate and an acceptance that political rivalry does not equate to personal enmity. This attitude should be encouraged among political leaders to foster an environment where ideas and policies take precedence over personal sensitivities. Such an environment is essential for the evolution of Nigeria’s democracy and the development of governance that truly serves the people.
READ ALSO: https://newsng.ng/2027-ishaya-malgwi-does-not-reflect-the-sentiments-or-intentions-of-northern-leadership-nor-the-stance-of-vice-president-kashim-shettima/
The response of former Vice President Atiku Abubakar and the stance of Vice President Kashim Shettima illustrates the tension between traditional values of respect and the vigorous nature of political engagement. While Atiku’s emphasis on decorum and cultural respect is commendable and reflective of his roots, it is imperative that he, and by extension all Nigerian politicians, differentiate between the expectations of traditional society and the requirements of political life. Political platforms demand open, sometimes confrontational dialogue that prioritizes truth and accountability over personal feelings.
Experienced politicians like Atiku should lead by example, demonstrating that respect in politics does not imply avoiding challenge but rather engaging with criticism constructively and without personalizing disputes. This distinction ensures that political debate remains vibrant and substantive, enriching Nigeria’s democratic culture. In this light, Kashim’s remarks represent the healthy functioning of political discourse, and Atiku’s response, though rooted in cultural sensibilities, would be better served by embracing the ethos of political respect—where contestation and honor coexist to strengthen governance and democracy. Thus, it is not disrespect but democracy in action as more of these would come to play as we head towards the 2027 election campaigns.
James Bwala, PhD, writes from Abuja.
2027: Of Shettima’s remarks And Atiku’s response
Politics
2027: Ishaya Malgwi does not reflect the sentiments or intentions of northern leadership nor the stance of Vice President Kashim Shettima.
2027: Ishaya Malgwi does not reflect the sentiments or intentions of northern leadership nor the stance of Vice President Kashim Shettima.
By: Dr. James Bwala
Insinuations by one, Mr. Ishaya Malawi, on the political happenings should be seen as the imaginations of his mindset. While he is free to make comments or statements as democratically allowed, there is a need for him to trade with caution, particularly in his attempts to drag the personality of the vice president, Kashim Shettima, into his imaginative sentiments. Recently, Mr. Ishaya Malgwi made an assertion suggesting that northern leaders might consider urging Vice President Kashim Shettima, GCON, to contest against President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, GCFR, under the banner of the All Progressives Congress (APC). This claim has sparked considerable debate and requires a measured response grounded in fact, loyalty, and an understanding of the current political trajectory of Nigeria under the APC administration. It is crucial to address this insinuation with clarity and responsibility to uphold the integrity of our democratic institutions and promote constructive political discourse.
Firstly, it is essential to establish that the suggestion by Mr. Malgwi does not reflect the sentiments or intentions of northern leadership nor the stance of Vice President Kashim Shettima himself. His Excellency, Vice President Kashim Shettima, is unequivocally loyal to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and firmly committed to the collective vision and mission of the APC government. The relationship between the president and the vice president is founded on mutual respect, shared goals, and a dedication to the welfare of Nigerians. To insinuate otherwise undermines not only their personal integrity but also the unity and progress of the ruling party.
READ ALSO: https://newsng.ng/umth-when-vp-kashim-shettima-acknowledges-ahidjo-and-hospital-staff-for-their-services-to-victims-of-maiduguri-bomb-blasts/
The APC government, since its inception, has been dedicated to fostering good governance, promoting inclusive development, and ensuring security and stability across the nation. Contrary to the portrayal of a fragmented administration, the APC operates as a cohesive entity working tirelessly to address the myriad challenges facing Nigeria. The claim that the APC is running parallel or competing governments within itself is unfounded and detrimental to the image of the administration both domestically and internationally. Such assertions risk sowing discord and confusion among citizens, detracting from the government’s focus on delivering tangible results.
Also, it is important to contextualize the prevailing issues of unrest, insecurity, hunger, and dissatisfaction within a historical framework. These challenges are not novel to the Tinubu administration; rather, they are deep-rooted problems inherited from previous administrations, exacerbated over years by complex socio-economic and political factors. While the current government acknowledges these issues and is actively working toward sustainable solutions, it is misleading to suggest that these problems originated solely with the APC’s leadership. Political discourse should therefore be grounded in reality and aimed at constructive engagement rather than unfounded blame.
READ ALSO: https://newsng.ng/umth-when-vp-kashim-shettima-acknowledges-ahidjo-and-hospital-staff-for-their-services-to-victims-of-maiduguri-bomb-blasts/
Mr. Malgwi’s reputation for disseminating unsubstantiated claims and engaging in provocative rhetoric must also be considered when evaluating his recent comments. Political dialogue in Nigeria demands responsibility, accountability, and a commitment to truth. When individuals like Ishaya Malgwi resort to spreading misinformation or making baseless allegations, they do a disservice to the democratic process and undermine public trust in governance. It is imperative that criticism, when necessary, be based on factual evidence and delivered respectfully to enhance national cohesion.
In dispelling the notion that Vice President Kashim Shettima might run against President Tinubu, it is also pertinent to highlight the Vice President’s demonstrated loyalty and active involvement in advancing the administration’s agenda. Vice President Shettima’s role extends beyond mere symbolism; he is deeply engaged in policymaking, outreach, and implementation of government programs. His efforts have consistently aligned with the president’s policies, reflecting a harmonious partnership aimed at stabilizing and developing the nation. To drag his name into speculative and divisive narratives not only misrepresents his position but also risks damaging the political harmony essential for effective governance.
READ ALSO: https://newsng.ng/umth-when-vp-kashim-shettima-acknowledges-ahidjo-and-hospital-staff-for-their-services-to-victims-of-maiduguri-bomb-blasts/
Mr. Ishaya Malgwi should know that the political unity within the APC is pivotal for Nigeria’s progress. The party’s platform is built on principles of inclusivity, democracy, and national development. Internal cohesion ensures that the party can effectively address pressing national concerns such as economic revitalization, security challenges, infrastructure development, and social welfare. Attempts to insinuate internal contests or rivalries without substantial proof serve no purpose other than to destabilize the party and distract from its governance responsibilities.
The insinuation by Mr. Ishaya Malgwi regarding Vice President Kashim Shettima’s potential opposition to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu within the APC is baseless and misleading. It does not represent the views of northern leaders or reflect the reality of the administration’s internal dynamics. Vice President Shettima remains a loyal and integral part of the Tinubu-led government, which continues to pursue policies aimed at good governance and national development.
The APC is not a house divided; it is a government determined to unify Nigerians and drive the country forward. Political discourse should honor the principles of truth, respect, and constructive criticism to foster an environment conducive to Nigeria’s growth and stability. Mr. Malgwi and others must exercise caution and responsibility in their public statements to avoid unnecessary political agitation and focus instead on supporting efforts that uphold Nigeria’s democratic values and collective prosperity.
* James Bwala, PhD, writes from Abuja.
2027: Ishaya Malgwi does not reflect the sentiments or intentions of northern leadership nor the stance of Vice President Kashim Shettima.
-
News2 years agoRoger Federer’s Shock as DNA Results Reveal Myla and Charlene Are Not His Biological Children
-
Opinions4 years agoTHE PLIGHT OF FARIDA
-
News12 months agoFAILED COUP IN BURKINA FASO: HOW TRAORÉ NARROWLY ESCAPED ASSASSINATION PLOT AMID FOREIGN INTERFERENCE CLAIMS
-
News2 years agoEYN: Rev. Billi, Distortion of History, and The Living Tamarind Tree
-
Opinions4 years agoPOLICE CHARGE ROOMS, A MINTING PRESS
-
ACADEMICS2 years agoA History of Biu” (2015) and The Lingering Bura-Pabir Question (1)
-
Columns2 years agoArmy University Biu: There is certain interest, but certainly not from Borno.
-
Opinions2 years agoTinubu,Shettima: The epidemic of economic, insecurity in Nigeria
