Columns
Non-Teaching of CRK In Borno Schools And Rev Dikwa’s Faulty Narrative
Non-Teaching of CRK In Borno Schools And Rev Dikwa’s Faulty Narrative
By: Inuwa Bwala
I can never defend anybody over his or her roles in the contentious stoppage of the teaching of Christian Religious Knowledge CRK in Primary and Secondary schools across Borno state.
Not because I am a Christian, but because I believe that, a sound moral background to the education of every child, irrespective of religious belief is a sine qua non to proper upbringing.
I am aware that Christians in Borno state have resolved to fight for the restoration of the teaching of CRK to their children in Borno state.
Perhaps, this is one policy I may never be able to defend my late boss: the firmer Governor of Borno state, Mala Kachallah: during whose tenure the controversial policy was introduced and implemented.
I was in that Government as his S A Media, but had little or no say at all, when it was being mulled untill it metamorphosed into a state policy. One fact however remains that, those who wrote the script snd forced it on Mala Kachallah were not only insensitive to the feelings of fellow citizens who were Christians, but most uncharitable to the Government that pledged and swore to uphold the secularity of the Nigerian state.
Be that as it may, I read Reverend Musa Dikwa,’s submissions in an interview with Sahara Reporters and I must confess that, though I respect the person of the Reverend Father, I totally disagree with him over his postulations, to the effect that, former Borno State Governor, Senator Kashim Shettima introduced the controversial policy, during his stewardship as Governor of Borno state.
Reverend Dikwa may not be a good student of history, being a clergyman, so I will tend to pardon the mix ups in his narrative on the issue of the non teaching if Christian Religious Knowledge in Borno schools.
But I will not fail to caution against dragging people into unnecessary controversy at this period of our fragile political quest as a nation.
I speak from position of authority as an insider, but not a participant in the intrigues that gave birth to that policy: controversial, as it remains.
There emerged a group of Islamic fundamentalists around the year 2000 in Borno state, comprising of highly educated and influential individuals, who were bent on enforcing the principles of the Shariah law to the later.
They were the same people who drafted the Borno state version of the law and cajoled Governor Mala Kachallah into signing the law: albeit reluctantly.
The necessary instruments for the implementation of the law were not however put in place, but the same group recruited some boys, who went about dismantling all sculptures, erected at strategic points within the metropolis, under the guise of implementing Shariah law.
These were the same group that threatened to let hell loose, unless Governor Mala Kachallah implements the policy that forbids the teaching of CRK in state schools.
I stand to be corrected, but following trends of events in Borno state since that time, i have a very strong inkling that, the group was to later metamorphose into the dreaded Boko Haram.
Thise who are conversant with how the Government operated under Shettima can testify to the fact that he made attempts to reverse that policy, when he sent some of us out to try and pacify our Christian brothers who suffered some forms deprivations. It remains to Kashim Shettima’s credit that there was no single controversy involving his government.
I recall when the lands department attempted to regularize church building documents at a certain period, he assigned us to intervene and settled the matter, by letting the churches be, despite certain infractions in their papers
How Reverend Dikwa got his own narrative from is still baffling to me, just as it is unfair to the person of Kashim Shettima, the Presidential running mate of the All Progressives Congress, APC.
READ ALSO: https://dailypost.ng/2022/10/29/journalists-in-yobe-boycott-government-activities-over-alleged-intimidation-harassment/
As at the time the policy was introduced, I make bold to say kashim Shettima was still in the private sector, pursuing a career as a banker, and never envisaged becoming the Governor or even pursuing unpopular policies as that one remains.
Having worked with Kashim Shettima, I can attest to his liberalism when it comes to issues of religion. For the period I worked with him, he has never demonstrated any form of discrimination in his policies.
I wish to place on record, that, Kashim Shettima was the first Governor to give two slots to Christians as commissioners and sponsored the highest number of Christian pilgrims ever by the Borno state Government.
I am aware that he has already pencilled down several Christians he plans to send for the pilgrimage this year, even as a private citizen.
I dare say, that, while Reverend Dikwa’s jaundiced story may sound sweet in the ears of political opponents and merchants of crisis, the truth must always be told: especially by those whose job it is to tell the truth. My take.
Non-Teaching of CRK In Borno Schools And Rev Dikwa’s Faulty Narrative
Columns
Dadong: A Balanced Voice From Ungwan Rukuba
Dadong: A Balanced Voice From Ungwan Rukuba
By: Balami Lazarus
What does it take to be a public mouthpiece? That was the question I asked Comrade Dadong Solomon Antibas. My chats with him were a balanced interface. The answers can be found in the write-up for your review.
Democracy like ours has brought to the limelight public mouthpiece voices; some are weak and political, while others are strong, progressive, constructive, and fearless, demanding progress, growth, and development as dividends of good governance in a peaceful atmosphere.
Governments created by democratic processes are never left alone without citizens asking questions and demanding dividends of democracy for their community and the country at large.
Comrade Dadong Solomon Antibas is a Nigerian, law-abiding citizen. Antibas, a security expert and popular public mouthpiece on the Jos Plateau, has earned the confidence of the people of his community, Ungwan Rukuba, and most parts of the state over the years. For his community, he is their immediate mouthpiece who has been speaking on their plights, calling the attention of the government under the leadership of Governor Caleb Manasseh Mutfwang to do the needful.
Personality like Solomon Antibas’ public impression of him by some citizens of the state is all about seeking relevance and political appointments. “I have no interest whatsoever in any political appointment. My sincere concern for my dear country and my state, Plateau, is peace, progress, growth, and development for future generations.”
Nigerians should begin to speak out on good governance at all levels. Citizens are also responsible for failing to hold them accountable and demand good governance in terms of security, social amenities, and infrastructure.
Ungwan Rukuba is one of the wards in the Jos North Local Government Area. It is an integral part of the city center. Unfortunately, the peaceful Ungwan Rukuba became a flashpoint. The terrorist attack of March 29th, 2026, has put a scar of insecurity on the area.
On insecurity, he said that Mr. President Ahmed Bola Tinubu has failed Nigerians woefully. “Insecurity is a bone of contention. The federal government must take decisive measures on the insecurity challenges bedeviling the nation.”
My findings on Comrade Dadong Antibas revealed that he is not a public affairs commentator or an analyst but a progressive and active public mouthpiece, a voice of the voiceless.
For some, Dadong is attacking the government under the leadership of Governor Mutfwang. ” Is speaking the minds of citizens on bad governance and holding the government of Governor Caleb Manasseh Mutfwang a crime”?
Despite threats on Solomon Dadong, they have not deterred him from speaking for and on behalf of other citizens living in the state. “I have no other way to hold the government accountable than to publicly speak and constructively criticize the leadership’s voicing out feelings and lots of the people…In democracy, governments are made by the people, and as such, they must provide for the collective needs of the masses who voted them in.”
Comrade Antibas is one among the few indigenous people of Plateau who are outspoken and speak with passion and a patriotic mind for his state and Nigeria. “I will live and die in Nigeria speaking, advocating, demanding, and/or holding both federal and state governments accountable for good governance.”
Balami, Publisher/Columnist, 08036779290
Dadong: A Balanced Voice From Ungwan Rukuba
Columns
Facts for Understanding Capital Market Investment
Facts for Understanding Capital Market Investment
By: Balami Lazarus
I grew up in an academic environment where the language is the same: study well, have good grades and be what you desire to be in the future through academic discipline and training.
Many of my contemporaries and I were not spoken to in the language of trade and commerce. But here are some of us as businessmen, entrepreneurs, investors and in other business enterprises far from the academic language we were bred with.
There has never been a market like the capital market the world over where trade per day runs into billions of cash. While market capitalisation is in trillions. The case of the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE), now Nigerian Exchange Group, with its trade symbol (NGX) on the floor, is a good example.
Investing in the capital market is profitable for traders and short- and long-term investors. But understanding the market requires some basic facts, which are cash, knowledge, discipline and patience, important for investors to appreciate the market.
Recently a member of my social group came to me to seek my advice on what it takes to invest in the equity market (stock exchange). I was very candid with the fellow, informing him that he needs cash, knowledge, discipline and patience to invest in the capital market after having defined his position as an investor.
First an investor needs cash in his possession set aside to invest in the capital market, the gateway into the market. You can have the other three, but without cash you are not yet an investor.
Lack of knowledge about a business or investments has made so many persons lose money worth millions.
This is typical with good number of Nigerians who attempted to start a business or invest in some going concerns without basic knowledge and understanding of the intricacies of these investments or businesses.
The information and technology age has
made acquiring knowledge very simple; therefore, understanding the stock market is easy these days.
Basically, the capital market depends on and responds to information, government policies, and economic and political happenings/events within and without, which most often determines the graphic movements of the primary market deals on the floor. ‘Bullish’ or ‘bearish’ simply means the plus or minus of the day’s transactions.
The need for monitoring of the market is important for traders and short-term investors. However, with knowledge and careful monitoring of the market, it is a suitable place for short-term gains for investors with multiple numbers of holdings in blue-chip companies like Dangote Cement, Bau Foods, Nestle, Aradel, Okumu Oil Palm, Zenith Bank, Guaranty Trust Bank and others. But for long-term investors, whether the market is bullish or bearish, his investment portfolio is for future use.
Investments like those of the capital market, discipline and being committed are necessary to build a strong, high-quality, profitable portfolio of a large number of holdings of units spread over listed companies of the stock exchange that come with capital appreciation and dividends. This is important, especially for long-term investors.
And the turn key in this type of investment is patience. Generally investments need patience for them to mature for harvest.
In stock market investment, patience plays a vital role in this business. Therefore, for an investor who lacks patience, the capital market is not a tuft for him and shall never be.
To navigate through this market, investors must at all times apply this formula and have it printed on their hearts. Cash = stock units over time + patience = capital apreciation/dividends.
Today there are changes in the exchange which have improved trading. The time of trade has been extended to transactions and payments (T+1). Other electronic applications to aid and encourage investors in the capital market in an attempt to boost the Nigerian economy.
Balami, Publisher/ Columnist 08036779290
Facts for Understanding Capital Market Investment
Columns
The ‘Hyenas’ and The Fear of Radical Changes
The ‘Hyenas’ and The Fear of Radical Changes
By: Balami Lazarus
Nigeria’s persistent security challenges, governance shortcomings, and societal stagnation were discoursed in a recent controversial work titled “Radical Approach: Ways of Ending the Menace of Insecurity in Nigeria,” which has sparked vehement reactions. These responses, saturated with insults and threats, underscore not only the resistance to transformative ideas but also reveal deeper cultural and psychological barriers inhibiting national progress.
Hyenas occupy a complex place symbolically and ecologically. Known for their powerful jaws capable of crushing bone and their fearsome appearance, hyenas possess attributes of strength and resilience. Ironically, the very qualities that should have crowned them kings of the jungle remain unrealized due to internal flaws—excessive fear and greed. This metaphor resonates profoundly with the Nigerian socio-political landscape. Many citizens and leaders embody these counterproductive traits, which sabotage collective progress. The ‘hyenas’ here are those resistant individuals who react aggressively to change, fearful of losing entrenched privileges or comfortable mediocrity.
Despite their natural capacities, hyenas do not kill their prey outright but feed until the victim is entirely consumed, a parallel to how corruption, insecurity, and dysfunctional governance gradually erode Nigeria’s potential. Nevertheless, because of this fear and greed, the true power of the hyenas remains dormant. Similarly, Nigerians possess enormous potential—humans and resources alike—but systemic fear of radical transformation prevents the nation from ascending to greatness.
Resistance to radical change is hardly unique to Nigeria; however, the scale and intensity of opposition here are particularly pronounced. The author of the initial work rightly posits that fundamental restructuring or amicable separation (balkanization) may be necessary to ensure peaceful coexistence among Nigeria’s diverse ethnic and regional groups. While this proposition unsettles many, it is grounded in historical precedents where developing nations embraced bold reforms, coupled with decisive policies and enforcement mechanisms, to dismantle corruption and oppression effectively.
For example, South Korea’s transformative journey from a war-ravaged country to a technological powerhouse was marked by radical government-led reforms, strict anti-corruption measures, and an unyielding commitment to national goals. Similarly, post-apartheid South Africa undertook sweeping constitutional and institutional reforms to redress systemic inequalities. These examples suggest that change without fear, and with a clear vision, is achievable. In Nigeria’s case, however, political leaders often prioritize personal gain over national interest, shielding corrupt practices from scrutiny and accountability—a scenario that foreign nationals sometimes benefit from more than average Nigerians.
Hence, it is not just a question of reform but an urgent call for a radical overhaul of the political, economic, and security frameworks—an overhaul that will inevitably provoke discomfort among the ‘hyenas’ who thrive on the status quo. Their hostility reflects a deeper anxiety about losing undue influence rather than genuine concern for national welfare.
Those who dare to voice radical solutions face fierce backlash. The insults, threats, and online harassment directed at the author of “Radical Approach” epitomize the perils confronting reformists. Such antagonism stems from a culture where free expression is often conflated with subversion and where critical voices are silenced through intimidation rather than engaged with constructively. This atmosphere breeds cynicism and self-censorship, retarding public discourse essential for democracy and progress.
The paradox lies in the fact that while politicians and vested interests propagate falsehoods to maintain their grip, genuine advocates of change are vilified. This creates a toxic environment where truth-tellers face social ostracism, leaving the masses bewildered about whom to trust. The condemnation of the author’s suggestion to either restructure or separate the country illustrates how deeply sensitive and contested the issue of national unity is—yet it also reveals the urgency to address unresolved grievances before they escalate into greater conflict.
It is crucial to emphasize that opinions, especially those anchored in personal conviction and aimed at national betterment, deserve respect and consideration, even if controversial. Democratic societies thrive on diverse viewpoints and vigorous debate. The author’s claim to persist as a ‘honey badger’—an animal known for fearless tenacity—symbolizes the courage required to confront entrenched systems and societal fears.
Change is seldom comfortable; it disrupts established norms and compels individuals to rethink identities and power structures. But without this discomfort, stagnation ensues, and nations risk eventual decline or disintegration. In Nigeria’s context, the failure to act decisively invites greater insecurity, economic hardship, and social unrest, ultimately threatening the very fabric of the nation.
To overcome the paralysis induced by fear and entrenched interests, Nigerians must collectively embrace the concept of radical but non-violent reform. The analogy of hyenas vividly encapsulates the paradox of strength hindered by fear and selfishness—a situation familiar to Nigeria today. The vehement backlash against radical proposals for restructuring or separation signals a collective unease but also highlights the necessity for bold action. History teaches us that radical change, enforced with fairness and resolve, is often the catalyst for national rebirth.
Nigeria stands at a crossroads. Will it continue to be prey to internal fears and greed, or will it muster the courage to embrace transformative ideas, no matter how uncomfortable they may seem? Advocates like the author of “Radical Approach” bear the burden and honor of challenging the status quo. Their persistence embodies hope that someday, rationality and justice will prevail over hostility and inertia.
In this pursuit, Nigerians must shed the fearful mindset that binds them and instead harness their inherent strengths—diversity, resilience, and youthful energy—to reclaim their destiny. Only then can the nation finally silence the cacophony of ‘hyenas’ and evolve into a stable, prosperous democracy worthy of its vast potential.
Balami, Publisher/Columnist 08036779290
The ‘Hyenas’ and The Fear of Radical Changes
-
News2 years agoRoger Federer’s Shock as DNA Results Reveal Myla and Charlene Are Not His Biological Children
-
Opinions4 years agoTHE PLIGHT OF FARIDA
-
News1 year agoFAILED COUP IN BURKINA FASO: HOW TRAORÉ NARROWLY ESCAPED ASSASSINATION PLOT AMID FOREIGN INTERFERENCE CLAIMS
-
News2 years agoEYN: Rev. Billi, Distortion of History, and The Living Tamarind Tree
-
Opinions5 years agoPOLICE CHARGE ROOMS, A MINTING PRESS
-
ACADEMICS2 years agoA History of Biu” (2015) and The Lingering Bura-Pabir Question (1)
-
Columns2 years agoArmy University Biu: There is certain interest, but certainly not from Borno.
-
Politics1 year ago2027: Why Hon. Midala Balami Must Go, as Youths in Hawul and Asikira/Uba Federal Constituency Reject ₦500,000 as Sallah Gift
