Politics
Kashim Shettima: When Dino Maleya and Reno Omokri sing for a drop of grains
Kashim Shettima: When Dino Maleya and Reno Omokri sing for a drop of grains
By: James Bwala
Dino Melaye has always had a flamboyant attitude, both in his private and professional life. We just hope that he matures to be as white as the beard that sat on his chins. A sign that he should have reached adulthood by the time he was meant to. The identical white beard was resting on his colleague, Reno Omokri and the identical bird was also scanning the political firmament of Nigeria for a grain on the sand.
According to Hussaini Yola in a video that went viral during Atiku’s visit to Yola before the campaigns, claimed that he (Hussaini) and Dino Melaye were friends, who used to taking weeds and recently, the most disgraced Nigerian senator in the country’s political history has come out to prove to the world that Indeed, Hissaini Yola has spoken the truth. This makes it normal for Dino Melaye to stand on a political podium to denigrate himself once more, when he lacks the words to tell the people to sell his Boss’s candidature ahead of the February 25, 2023 general elections.
The video of Dino Melaye at one of the campaign rallies, playing his typical role of a wayward boy who abandoned his mother’s upbringing in order to embrace shame, leaving his mother wondering what she had given birth to, was rather mocking to the entire Kogi west, which he had previously represented.

Many people laughed as they remembered the disgusting situation when Dino Malaye knew he had run out of things to say to persuade the public about the candidate he was standing for and, like a child who had given up on a fight, ran home hurt and barked. His speeches further put the PDP on a tray like he did with the groundnut on his head in one of his moments to mock himself.
Dino Melaye goes into further detail about his reasons for remaining a perpetual student during his days at the Ahmadu Bello University in Zaria. No thanks to ‘Alfarma’. Instead of emulating Kashim Shettima’s speech to the Emir of Daura and continuing to inform the rally attendees about the APC’s strategy for appealing to the Nigerian people, he took the incorrect path, acting in a charlatan-like manner. He has readily defines that there are several ways to distinguish an intelligent personality from a shrinking marginal cost that Dino Melaye has shaped himself into. Whether he agrees with the realities that distinguish him from Kashim Shettima or not, the reality that Dino Malaye watches movies while Kashim Shettima studies books is the foundation on which they function.
However, Reno Omokri, who is his cousin in politics and is traveling to London to gain recognition for the PDP, seems to be feeding the white people with anecdotes about onions and cucumbers rather than waiting for them to inquire about events in Nigeria. In a video that is currently circulating, Reno discussed the kidnapping of the Chibok girls and claimed Kashim Shettima was responsible.
He was referring to the kidnapping of the 276 Chibok School Girls by Boko Haram in the southern Borno region of northeastern Nigeria’s Chibok local government area. Prior to this, Senator Dino Melaye, the PDP spokesman, had insulted Senator Kashim Shettima in relation to the kidnapping of the Chibok girls by terrorists who were still exalting their triumphs in battle some 14 years after Mohammed Yusuf’s execution that marked the beginning of the insurgency.

Senator Kashim Shettima maintains his composure throughout all of this, allowing them to state what they have heard and read from people that are neither now in Borno nor have access to the stories of what actually transpired. But the moment has come for mediocre people like those who openly show their ignorance about the incident or who purposely chose to make Kashim Shettima the scapegoat in this militarized expedition that ended the hopes and dreams of several people who are still held captive.
READ ALSO: https://newsng.ng/nbbf-the-voice-of-jacob-and-the-hand-of-esau/
When Kashim Shettima vowed to speak up, he was restrained because he knew that if he did, heads will roll for revealing what he knew about the conflict and the role that politics played in the Chibok Girls’ kidnapping by the ruling party at the time.
Dino Melaye and Reno Omokri both held positions as a legislator and an assistant to the president respectively at this time. Can they describe the steps they took to prevent the charlatans from kidnapping the Chibok Girls for ransom to Nigerians? Or would they claim, in their capacity as legislator and advisor, that they are unaware that the military withdrew within three days prior to the incident and Nigerian Journalists working in Maiduguri had reported from a letter released by the insurgents about their intention to attack Chibok town on the specified date? Who is the military’s commander? Shettima or Jonathan?
When the crime was committed and 276 Chibok girls were abducted, what action did these committed people take in the form of legislation and assistance to support the government of Borno state at the time, led by Kashim Shettima, in order to exert pressure on the federal government, led by President Goodluck Jonathan, to secure the release of these innocent schoolgirls whose future they used to trade in political games?
Why are they looking to Kashim Shettima as a scapegoat when they know that it was actually the federal government’s failing that caused the situation? With only three days’ warning, journalists in Borno state have already reported for the Daily Trust, Nigerian Tribune, Leadership Newspaper, and a large number of other publications from other media outlets.
Reno in London was quoting a letter purportedly written by Nysome Wike, who is currently the governor of Rivers state and was previously the state’s minister of education, to the Borno administration. However, he never informed his audience about the federal government’s actions at the time when the media accurately reported the approaching risks according to the attackers’ estimates of time. It takes about one and a half hours to go from Maiduguri, the capital of Borno state, to Chibok, which is only 117 kilometers away.
President Goodluck Jonathan’s administration saw the Boko Haram battle as a potential Hollywood blockbuster. Dino Malaye and Reno Omokri, who are currently trending on the topic, never found a cause to support the government of Borno state at the time. In some places around the world and on political platforms today, they are consuming the remains of blood, death, and ashes.
Kashim Shettima: When Dino Maleya and Reno Omokri sing for a drop of grains
Politics
2027: Tinubu, Shettima, Uba Sani, and the APC flag-off campaign in Kaduna
2027: Tinubu, Shettima, Uba Sani, and the APC flag-off campaign in Kaduna
By: Dr. James Bwala
The claim that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has abandoned Northern Nigeria is not merely inaccurate; it is a politically manufactured narrative that collapses under the weight of evidence. It is a convenient slogan for those seeking to convert legitimate public concerns into partisan resentment, but it is not a fair representation of the administration’s record. The most authoritative rebuttal has come from within the region itself: Governor Uba Sani of Kaduna State, who, at the All Progressives Congress Presidential Campaign Council flag-off, offered a chronological and data-driven account of the interventions of the Tinubu-Shettima administration in Kaduna and across the North-West.
Governor Sani’s presentation deserves serious attention because it shifts the debate from emotion to evidence. Rather than relying on general claims or political rhetoric, he identified concrete programs, infrastructure projects, economic measures, and social interventions undertaken by the administration. His account demonstrated that the Federal Government’s engagement with Northern Nigeria has been substantial, strategic, and historically significant. Anyone still insisting that President Tinubu has abandoned the region must therefore confront the record instead of repeating a politically attractive falsehood.
Governance should be judged by policies and outcomes, not by social media complaints. Northern Nigeria, like every other part of the country, faces serious challenges: insecurity, poverty, unemployment, food inflation, weak infrastructure, and limited access to social services. These problems did not begin with the Tinubu administration, nor can they be eliminated overnight. However, the existence of difficulties does not prove abandonment. In fact, the appropriate question is whether the government has responded to those difficulties with meaningful interventions. Governor Sani’s exposition shows clearly that it has.
One of the most important elements of the Tinubu administration’s intervention is its attention to infrastructure. The Northwest has historically suffered from inadequate road networks, poor transport connectivity, and limited industrial infrastructure. These deficiencies have restricted trade, increased transportation costs, weakened agricultural value chains, and isolated communities. Under President Tinubu, however, major road and transport projects have received renewed attention. Federal road rehabilitation, the development of strategic transport corridors, and efforts to improve links between commercial centers have been incorporated into a broader economic agenda.
Kaduna occupies a central position in the Northwest, serving as a gateway between the northern states and the Federal Capital Territory. Investment in the state therefore has consequences that extend beyond its borders. Improved roads and transport networks facilitate the movement of farm produce, connect manufacturers to markets, and reduce the cost of doing business. They also deepen national integration by linking communities that have too often remained economically disconnected. These are not symbolic gestures. They are foundational investments in the productive capacity of the region.
The administration’s transportation agenda also reflects a recognition that the North requires more than isolated projects. It needs an integrated system capable of supporting agriculture, industry, trade, and human mobility. Rail development, road construction, and logistics improvements are especially important in a region where long distances separate production zones from major markets. By strengthening these connections, the government is laying the groundwork for a more competitive Northern economy.
Agriculture is another area in which the administration’s policies directly address the realities of the region. Northern Nigeria possesses enormous agricultural potential, but that potential has been undermined by insecurity, inadequate storage, poor access to credit, weak processing capacity, and limited irrigation. President Tinubu’s agricultural initiatives seek to address some of these challenges through support for farmers, efforts to improve food production, and measures designed to strengthen agricultural value chains.
The importance of this approach cannot be overstated. It is not enough to tell farmers to produce more if they lack access to inputs, financing, equipment, storage facilities, and markets. Nor can food security be achieved by treating agriculture as a subsistence activity detached from industry. The proper strategy is to build a system in which farmers produce, processors add value, and markets distribute goods efficiently. Governor Sani’s account of federal interventions in Kaduna and the North-West indicates that this integrated vision is increasingly informing government policy.
Kaduna’s position as an agricultural and commercial hub makes it a natural beneficiary of such initiatives. Investments that improve farming, irrigation, processing, and transportation can create jobs, raise household incomes, and reduce dependence on imported food. They can also provide young people with alternatives to criminality and extremist recruitment. In this sense, agricultural development is not only an economic policy; it is also a security strategy.
The claim of abandonment is further weakened by the administration’s social investment programs. The removal of the petrol subsidy and other economic reforms created immediate hardship for many Nigerians, particularly low-income households. It would be dishonest to deny that these policies imposed significant pressure. Yet it would be equally dishonest to ignore the compensatory measures introduced by the government to cushion their effects. The administration has implemented initiatives involving conditional cash transfers, support for small businesses, student loans, food distribution, and assistance to vulnerable households.
Northern Nigeria, with its large population of poor and vulnerable citizens, has been a major beneficiary of these programs. These interventions may not solve every problem, but they demonstrate governmental responsiveness rather than indifference. A government that distributes relief materials, expands social protection, and supports small-scale enterprises cannot reasonably be described as having abandoned the people it serves.
The administration’s response to economic hardship must also be understood in the context of the difficult reforms it inherited. Nigeria’s fiscal position, debt burden, and energy subsidy system had become increasingly unsustainable. Maintaining the old structure might have postponed discomfort, but it would have deepened the country’s long-term crisis. President Tinubu chose reform over delay. The challenge now is to ensure that the gains from reform are translated into better living standards through accountable implementation, job creation, and effective social protection.
This distinction is important. Criticizing the pace or effectiveness of government programs is legitimate. Demanding transparency, stronger targeting, and better delivery are necessary. But criticism should not be falsely dismissed as inaction. Governor Sani’s evidence shows that the administration is active across multiple sectors and that its interventions are especially relevant to the needs of the North.
Security, perhaps more than any other issue, shapes public perception of government performance in Northern Nigeria. Terrorism, banditry, kidnapping, and communal violence have inflicted immense suffering on families, farmers, schools, and businesses. The government’s security record therefore deserves rigorous scrutiny. At the same time, it is essential to recognize the efforts being made to strengthen the armed forces, improve intelligence coordination, and support security operations.
Northern governors and communities have repeatedly acknowledged the complexity of the security crisis. It is not caused by a single factor, nor can it be resolved through military action alone. Poverty, ungoverned spaces, illicit arms trafficking, weak justice systems, and youth unemployment all contribute to insecurity. The federal government’s responsibilities include equipping security agencies and coordinating national responses, while state and local authorities must also improve community-level intelligence, policing, and social development.
The Tinubu administration’s interventions in the North must therefore be evaluated within this broader framework. Security investments, infrastructure development, agricultural support, and social protection reinforce one another. A road that enables security access, a school that keeps children away from extremist influence, a farm-support program that restores livelihoods, and a social intervention that prevents destitution all contribute to stability. Development and security are not separate agendas; they are mutually dependent.
Governor Sani’s chronological presentation is particularly significant because it challenges the selective memory often deployed in political arguments. Critics sometimes isolate one unpopular policy or one period of hardship and present it as the totality of the administration’s record. Such an approach is intellectually weak. Responsible evaluation requires attention to the sequence of reforms, projects, and interventions over time. It requires examining what was inherited, what has been attempted, what has been completed, and what remains unfinished.
By setting out the government’s actions in chronological order, Governor Sani demonstrated that the engagement with Kaduna and the North-West did not consist of occasional political visits or empty promises. It involved sustained attention across infrastructure, agriculture, social welfare, transportation, and economic development. The cumulative effect of these measures is more important than any single announcement.
The governor’s testimony also carries political weight because he is not an outsider speaking about the North from a distance. He leads Kaduna State and understands the region’s needs, expectations, and frustrations. His assessment is based on direct experience with federal projects and programs. While his political affiliation naturally makes him supportive of the administration, dismissing his account solely on that basis would be an evasion. The relevant issue is whether the facts he cited can be verified. They can and should be.
Northern Nigerians are entitled to ask difficult questions of any government. They deserve better security, more jobs, lower food prices, functional schools, quality healthcare, and reliable infrastructure. Support for President Tinubu should not require silence about shortcomings. Indeed, constructive support should include honest demands for better performance. But those demands will lose credibility when they are built on demonstrably false claims.
The narrative of abandonment is particularly dangerous because it distorts public understanding and deepens regional resentment. It suggests that the federal government has deliberately ignored Northern Nigeria, despite the region’s central role in national politics, agriculture, security, and commerce. Such a narrative does not help citizens secure better governance. Instead, it encourages suspicion, erodes trust, and turns development into a competition of grievances.
What the North needs is not political victimhood but effective representation, informed advocacy, and measurable development. Governors, legislators, traditional leaders, civil society organizations, and citizens must continue to demand accountability. They must also distinguish between genuine gaps and fabricated accusations. Where projects are delayed, the government should be pressed to complete them. Where funds are mismanaged, those responsible should be held accountable. Where programs are poorly targeted, they should be redesigned. But the existence of unfinished work does not erase completed work, just as hardship does not prove abandonment.
- James Bwala, PhD, writes from Abuja.
2027: Tinubu, Shettima, Uba Sani, and the APC flag-off campaign in Kaduna
Politics
Delta Community Endorses Chukwuyenim for 2027 Assembly Election
Delta Community Endorses Chukwuyenim for 2027 Assembly Election
By: Michael Mike
A community in Delta State has endorsed Labour Party aspirant, Mr Ossamulu Chukwuyenim, for the Ndokwa/Ukwuani Federal Constituency seat in the House of Representatives ahead of the 2027 general election.
The endorsement was announced on Thursday during a virtual ceremony led by a community leader, Mr Ossai Nzekwe, popularly known as Okpala Uju of Umom from Unuaghulu, who called for leadership anchored on humility, respect for elders and commitment to community development.
The ceremony, held at Okpia Umuagulu in Ndokwa East Constituency, attracted stakeholders from Isitu, Umuagulu, Obeze, Ashaka, Ibusu, Ngwekaba and Umuedem villages.

Nzekwe said the endorsement reflected the community’s confidence in Chukwuyenim’s capacity to provide responsible leadership and effective representation at the National Assembly.
“Our blessings upon Chukwuyenim reaffirm the importance of leadership rooted in humility, respect for our elders and a genuine commitment to the development of our community,” he said.
He described the endorsement as an expression of community support for the aspirant, adding that it was intended to promote effective representation in the 2027 elections.
Responding, Chukwuyenim thanked Nzekwe and other participants for their support, saying the endorsement reinforced his commitment to peace, unity and sustainable development across the constituency.
“Our vision is centred on a Ndokwa/Ukwuani where every community is habitable, inclusive and peaceful, with opportunities for our people to thrive,” he said.
He pledged to prioritise infrastructure, potable water, improved road networks, security, youth development and agricultural reforms if elected.
According to him, the proposed initiatives would strengthen social cohesion, improve living conditions and expand opportunities for residents across the constituency.
Chukwuyenim also pledged to uphold community values and pursue development programmes aimed at improving the welfare of his constituents.
The ceremony featured goodwill messages from traditional leaders and prayers for divine guidance, strength and success for the aspirant.
Delta Community Endorses Chukwuyenim for 2027 Assembly Election
Politics
2027: APC Deploys Diaspora Network to Fight Anti-Tinubu Narratives, Mobilise Re-election Support
2027: APC Deploys Diaspora Network to Fight Anti-Tinubu Narratives, Mobilise Re-election Support
By: Michael Mike
The All Progressives Congress (APC) has unveiled an international mobilisation and media offensive to defend President Bola Tinubu’s economic policies, counter negative narratives about his administration and rally support for his re-election in 2027, targeting Nigerians living across major countries in Africa, Europe, Asia, the Middle East and North America.
Under the plan, the party intends to activate its overseas chapters, deploy coordinated digital advocacy, establish a rapid-response mechanism to challenge misinformation, mobilise diaspora funding and encourage voter participation at home as it seeks to shape public perception of Tinubu’s first term ahead of the presidential election.
The Director of the PBAT/APC 2027 Presidential Campaign Council (PCC) Directorate of Diaspora Mobilisation, Hon. Abike Dabiri-Erewa, unveiled the strategy at a press briefing in Abuja, describing Nigerians abroad as an influential constituency whose financial contributions, professional expertise and international networks could be harnessed to support the administration.
The initiative signals the APC’s determination to make the diaspora an organised component of its re-election campaign, using Nigerians’ connections with relatives, communities and professional networks abroad to communicate the government’s position on its economic reforms and development agenda.
Dabiri-Erewa said the directorate would not limit its mobilisation to party members, but would also reach out to Nigerians abroad who were willing to participate in the campaign.
“Nigerians abroad are not outsiders. They are stakeholders. They are our doctors, nurses, engineers, students, traders, innovators and community leaders, who send over $20 billion annually back home in remittances,” she said.
She identified the mobilisation of APC diaspora chapters in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, South Africa, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, France, Germany, Australia, Turkey, India and Kazakhstan as a priority, alongside engagement with diaspora associations and community leaders.
At the centre of the strategy is a digital advocacy campaign tagged Operation Tell Your Story, through which supporters would receive short videos, infographics and other communication materials promoting the administration’s policies and achievements.
The campaign would address the foreign exchange reforms, foreign reserves, support for small businesses, housing programmes and opportunities for students, while seeking to counter claims the directorate considers misleading.
Dabiri-Erewa also announced plans for a rapid-response hub to provide data, fact-check claims and promote what she described as credible information about Nigeria’s investment climate, economic stabilisation and prospects under Tinubu.
“Our directorate will serve as a rapid-response hub in case of misinformation about Nigeria and the administration. We will provide credible data, fact-check and positive narratives about Nigeria’s investment climate, stabilisation of the economy and the future under President Tinubu,” she said.
The move comes amid continuing public debate over the administration’s economic reforms, particularly the removal of the petrol subsidy and changes to the foreign exchange system, which have had significant implications for households and businesses.
Dabiri-Erewa acknowledged the hardship associated with the subsidy removal but defended the policy as a necessary intervention to address structural weaknesses in the economy.
“President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has decided not to manage our feelings, but to fix the system. And it takes a bold leader to do that,” she said.
She argued that Nigerians living abroad could help explain the rationale behind the reforms to their families and communities, particularly because of their understanding of the challenges associated with the previous foreign exchange arrangements.
However, the directorate’s strategy will face the challenge of persuading voters at home that the administration’s policies are delivering sufficient benefits to justify the economic sacrifices they have experienced. The effectiveness of the campaign will therefore depend not only on the reach of its messaging but also on the credibility of its claims and the administration’s record against measurable economic outcomes.
Beyond digital advocacy, the APC plans to mobilise diaspora contributions through structured fundraising platforms to finance campaign activities, voter education materials, town hall meetings and grassroots mobilisation.
Dabiri-Erewa said the proposed fundraising arrangements would emphasise transparency and accountability, but did not disclose the amount the directorate hopes to raise or provide details of the proposed platforms.
The fourth strand of the strategy would focus on voter education and homecoming mobilisation, with diaspora Nigerians encouraged to remind eligible relatives and community members to register, collect their Permanent Voter Cards and participate in the election.
The directorate also intends to use its overseas networks to encourage Nigerians abroad to return home, engage their communities and take part in the political process.
In a related appeal, Dabiri-Erewa called on the National Assembly to consider constitutional amendments that would allow Nigerians living abroad to vote in Nigerian elections.
She acknowledged that diaspora voting remained a subject of debate but expressed hope that lawmakers would address the issue, potentially expanding the formal participation of Nigerians abroad in the country’s electoral process.
Dabiri-Erewa, who also heads the Nigerians in Diaspora Commission (NiDCOM), said the commission had established a portal for registering Nigerians living outside the country and put the estimated diaspora population at more than 17 million.
She also urged Nigerians to monitor how state and local governments utilise increased allocations following the removal of the petrol subsidy, arguing that greater public revenue should be accompanied by accountability in spending.
Other members of the directorate backed the administration’s economic policies, acknowledging the hardship associated with the reforms while arguing that the intended benefits would take time to materialise. They highlighted investment, skills transfer, business partnerships and collaboration with government institutions as additional ways diaspora Nigerians could contribute to national development.
Dabiri-Erewa urged the media to support the directorate’s communication efforts, saying the campaign would focus on continuity, national development and Tinubu’s stated ambition to move Nigeria from reforms to prosperity.
With the 2027 election approaching, the APC’s strategy places diaspora mobilisation, digital communication and the battle over the interpretation of the administration’s economic record at the heart of its re-election effort. Whether the initiative translates into broader electoral support will ultimately depend on how Nigerians judge the government’s performance and whether the campaign can substantiate its claims with credible
2027: APC Deploys Diaspora Network to Fight Anti-Tinubu Narratives, Mobilise Re-election Support
-
News3 years agoRoger Federer’s Shock as DNA Results Reveal Myla and Charlene Are Not His Biological Children
-
Opinions5 years agoTHE PLIGHT OF FARIDA
-
News2 years agoFAILED COUP IN BURKINA FASO: HOW TRAORÉ NARROWLY ESCAPED ASSASSINATION PLOT AMID FOREIGN INTERFERENCE CLAIMS
-
Opinions5 years agoPOLICE CHARGE ROOMS, A MINTING PRESS
-
News3 years agoEYN: Rev. Billi, Distortion of History, and The Living Tamarind Tree
-
ACADEMICS3 years agoA History of Biu” (2015) and The Lingering Bura-Pabir Question (1)
-
Columns3 years agoArmy University Biu: There is certain interest, but certainly not from Borno.
-
Politics1 year ago2027: Why Hon. Midala Balami Must Go, as Youths in Hawul and Asikira/Uba Federal Constituency Reject ₦500,000 as Sallah Gift
