Connect with us

Politics

Nigeria: The Politics of the Hunger Protest and the Wrong Move for the Government’s Attention

Published

2 years ago

on

Nigeria: The Politics of the Hunger Protest and the Wrong Move for the Government's Attention

Nigeria: The Politics of the Hunger Protest and the Wrong Move for the Government’s Attention

By: Dr. James Bwala

In the legendary 1955 film Rebel Without a Cause, three middle-class teenagers unexpectedly commit three separate crimes and then claim their acts were due to the fact that they were frustrated with their parental situations. In real life, a rebellion sociology definition refers to when an individual rebuffs goals and means that are accepted by a society and replaces them with goals and means that are not accepted by the society. This claim is corroborated by the definition by Robert K. Merton, which defines rebellion as when an individual replaces goals, as well as means, that are accepted by their society with goals, as well as means, that are not accepted by their society. He also defines rebellion as being more extreme than retreatism.

The August 1–10 announcement of a peaceful protest was like the classical film Rebel without a Cause; in this case, however, I can say, Protest without a Cause. Although the protest was tagged as ‘Hunger Protest’, with a promise of a peaceful movement, the resulting end clearly indicated that more than issues of hunger, the protest has its own agenda to achieve beyond the surface to which it was organized. Political protest is defined as a variety of methods used by individuals and groups to express dissatisfaction with the current political system, often involving mass activism outside of traditional parliamentary channels, such as demonstrations, boycotts, and civil disobedience. What the organizers said is that the protest is going to be peaceful. But what we saw from day one to day five of this protest was the sociology definition in Robert K. Morton’s words: rebellion. 

How can someone explain the sense of burning our national flag and raising the flag of another country or the military flag in democratic settings with a call for military intervention if the real reason behind the protest is hunger? 

Hunger is defined by the United Nations as periods when people experience severe food insecurity, meaning that they go for entire days without eating due to a lack of money, access to food, or other resources. However, what we saw during this period is that hunger is more complicated than empty bellies. It interconnects issues of poverty, inequality, conflict, climate change, gender discrimination, weak government and health systems, etc., all of which play a role in driving hunger. 

From the discussions arising on matters of the protest, the display and interplay of issues give a reflection of the kind of society that we are living in. A society where we have all failed to look beyond ourselves and our contributions to where we are currently living and choose to shift blame is typical of a Nigerian, who sees nothing wrong with his or her action or inaction but dares to condemn the actions of others. I have lived closer to one of the biggest internally displaced persons, the IDP camp in Maiduguri, and I got the figures of persons living at that camp standing at 38,000 in population. More than 12,000 households and that camp called “Bakassi IDP Camp” in Maiduguri gave me an understanding of the definition of hunger by the United Nations. 

I have traveled far and wide in my work as a reporter. I have visited places affected by Boko Haram conflicts and banditry, especially in the Northeast, Northwest, and Central Nigeria. I have visited a few places in the southeast and south-south parts of the country, and I have been home in the southwest part of the country for the last two decades of my journey in the journalism mines field. I have seen the results of poverty and what our protesters tagged as the lead in the 10-day protests as the days count. In all these, I have learned lessons about the resilience of our people in the face of hunger. That hunger is the issue for this protest was something far from the truth, and still, I cannot comprehend why it has to be about the Tinubu administration. This is not about the hunger protest; it is about a political interest, and this is the wrong move to get the government’s attention. 

READ ALSO:https://newsng.ng/umth-how-professor-ahidjos-transformation-agenda-impacted-the-information-unit/

Many Nigerians have been brainwashed not to see anything good about the Tinubu administration but hunger and hardship in the land. They have seen nothing in the speech made by the president. They described the speech as empty because, according to them, it did not define what they had expected. Most of them speaking have held government’s offices at certain levels in their careers and have enjoyed government’s scholarship in one way or another. In their own eyes, what they have done or contributed is good enough to position them to criticize the government today. They never see their actions or inaction in the past as contributing to the mass neglect of their duties that informed and brought us to where we are today. 

I have the opportunity to speak with some high-level citizens who share their views and support for the protest. In our discussions, the list of those who supported the protest includes over 30 individuals. Some of them are friends of the president. I believe if they wanted to see the president, they could do so without stress. I do not know why they would stand so far and support or acknowledge the protest when they can easily approach the president and inform or give him advice that can move the nation forward. I could not be convinced, knowing the positions they held in the past, that their voices could not matter at this time and that only by supporting or nodding heads at the protest could they be heard. 

We all know about government: the office, authority, or function of governing. Governing: having control over or ruling over oneself. We all understand governance as the activity of governing. Accordingly, governance is a set of decisions and processes made to reflect social expectations through the management or leadership of the government (by extension, under liberal democratic ideals, the will of ‘the people’ as they rule themselves). There are many issues implicit in this set of relationships whose core revolves around the notion of citizenship, as this defines the body politic over which claims of self-rule apply. 

In the most general sense, we have the difference between a liberal democratic view that the government (state) serves citizens who have a natural claim to services as a benefit and right of citizenship on the one hand and, on the other, the counter-enlightenment view often associated with fascism: that the citizen must serve the state and has no rights other than those granted by the state. In what may be called the American model of citizenship, which, through our system of government practice, is a broadly endowed set of rights representing potential claims for benefits as defined by the state, what constitutes a valid claim by citizens is contested, and then the question of who qualifies to have claims met is debated. This offers us an opportunity to understand a number of pressing issues hotly contested: what is the proper role of government, who should have the right to make claims, how exclusionary or inclusive we should be as a society, how are rights defined and defended, to name but a few. 

It was supposed to be a peaceful protest, as the organizers have told us. But what we saw on the streets on the first of August was nothing short of rebellion. They said it was hijacked, but who hijacked it? In what I saw on the streets, strong young men who do not qualify under the definition of hunger are those on the streets. In what I saw on the streets are young men who are raising another country’s flag other than my country’s flag. What I saw on the streets were the young men who were burning my country’s flag and chanting for military intervention. I ran through the streets and talked to some people within the bracket of hunger as defined by the United Nations; they are the onlookers and those who are praying that this does not escalate to a situation where we could not have a country to call our own because some disgruntled fools are let loose on our streets for political score cards in the name of hunger protest. 

Dr. James Bwala, PhD, writes from Abuja.

Nigeria: The Politics of the Hunger Protest and the Wrong Move for the Government’s Attention

Related Topics:
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

2027 VP Certificate of Return: The Triumphant Shettima

Published

49 minutes ago

on

July 17, 2026

By

Vice President, Kashim Shettima


2027 VP Certificate of Return: The Triumphant Shettima

By: Dr James Bwala

The formal presentation of the All Progressives Congress (APC) vice-presidential nomination certificate to Vice President Kashim Shettima by President Bola Tinubu at the State House in Abuja marks a historic moment in Nigeria’s political landscape. This event is not merely ceremonial; it signifies the consolidation of a strategic political partnership and underscores the indispensable role of the vice presidency in national governance and electoral calculations. The critics who have underestimated the political significance of the vice-presidential office, relegating it to a position of symbolic presence confined to social functions, must now reconsider their stance. Vice President Kashim Shettima emerges not only as a formidable political figure but also as a master in governance, diplomacy, and relationship building, making him the ideal running mate for the 2027 presidential election.

The fallacy that Shettima serves only as a figurehead or mere attendee at weddings and funerals fails to appreciate the sophisticated political dynamics underlying such social engagements. In the complex web of Nigerian politics, public appearances at community events are far from trivial. They represent critical opportunities for leaders like Shettima to forge bonds, nurture trust, and demonstrate empathy with various constituencies. This aspect of grassroots engagement is very important for political sustainability and electoral success, especially in a nation as ethnically and regionally diverse as Nigeria.

READ ALSO: https://newsng.ng/kashim-shettima-the-imperative-of-agricultural-revitalization-and-the-case-for-the-niger-deltas-agrarian-future/

Vice President Shettima’s approach over the past three years under President Tinubu’s administration exemplifies a transformative model of vice-presidential leadership. Unlike his predecessors, who often remained distant or disengaged from the public beyond official duties, Shettima has established himself as the most sociable and accessible vice president in Nigeria’s recent history. His consistent presence across the six geopolitical zones—attending significant social, religious, and cultural events—reflects a profound understanding of Nigeria’s sociopolitical fabric. This strategy has enabled him to cultivate a broad base of support that transcends ethnic and regional divides, an asset invaluable to any national campaign.

The ability to emotionally connect with people through shared experiences at weddings, funerals, and other communal gatherings creates a lasting impact that goes beyond superficial visibility. It stirs a deeper level of connection, fostering loyalty and goodwill towards the leadership. Shettima’s sensitivity to these moments has rendered him not just a political figurehead but a trusted representative of the people, fulfilling the crucial role of bridging government and citizenry. Such engagement is fundamental to democratic governance and a testament to his political acumen.

READ ALSO: https://newsng.ng/kashim-shettima-the-imperative-of-agricultural-revitalization-and-the-case-for-the-niger-deltas-agrarian-future/

The lessons gleaned from Shettima’s network-building efforts reveal a nuanced grasp of power and influence unique for effective leadership. Politics, especially in a federal system like Nigeria’s, requires more than policy expertise; it demands strategic alliances and interpersonal relationships. Shettima’s success in cultivating friendships and collaborations among diverse political actors has strengthened both his profile and the APC’s reach. This extensive networking capacity reinforces his suitability as a vice-presidential candidate who can unite various factions and present a cohesive front in the 2027 elections.

The significance of Shettima’s receipt of the certificate of return extends beyond personal triumph; it symbolises the resilience of democratic processes within the APC and the broader Nigerian polity. Despite detractors and so-called “wishy-washers” who sought to undermine his candidature, the vice president’s nomination confirms the party’s confidence in his leadership qualities and electoral appeal. It sends a clear message that the vice-presidency is a vital component of executive power and electoral strategy—a partnership essential for steering Nigeria towards stability and progress.

READ ALSO: https://newsng.ng/kashim-shettima-the-imperative-of-agricultural-revitalization-and-the-case-for-the-niger-deltas-agrarian-future/

In addition, Shettima’s persona as the “people’s vice president” and “Jagoran Arewa” (Leader of the North) impact deeply with the northern electorate and beyond. His background and proven track record furnish him with the legitimacy and moral authority to address regional concerns while maintaining national unity. This dual appeal is critical in a country where ethnic and regional identities profoundly shape political allegiances. His ability to balance these identities within the framework of national integration positions him as a unifying figure capable of advancing inclusive governance.

Critics who diminish the vice-presidential role overlook the institutional and constitutional responsibilities that the office entails. The vice president is not merely a standby official but an active participant in policymaking, governance, and representation. Shettima’s tenure has demonstrated commitment to these responsibilities, often spearheading initiatives and representing the presidency on critical domestic and international platforms. This proactive stance challenges outdated perceptions and elevates the office’s relevance in contemporary Nigerian politics.

READ ALSO: https://newsng.ng/kashim-shettima-the-imperative-of-agricultural-revitalization-and-the-case-for-the-niger-deltas-agrarian-future/

Vice President Kashim Shettima’s presentation of the APC vice-presidential nomination certificate is a landmark achievement that validates his political stature and strategic importance. His journey from perceived marginalisation to political prominence showcases the power of relationship-building, empathy, and visionary leadership. 

As Nigeria approaches the 2027 presidential elections, Shettima stands as a testament to the evolving nature of the vice presidency—one characterised by active governance, broad-based support, and commitment to the nation’s unity and progress. The triumph of Shettima is not just a personal victory; it is a collective affirmation that strong, socially engaged leadership at all levels of government is indispensable for Nigeria’s democratic future. Congratulations to the people’s vice president and Jagoran Arewa on this well-deserved milestone.

*James Bwala, PhD, writes from Abuja.

2027 VP Certificate of Return: The Triumphant Shettima

Continue Reading

Politics

The Fear Of Shettima: Atiku, Amaechi Draws New Blueprint to Battle Tinubu in 2027

Published

5 days ago

on

July 13, 2026

By

Vice President, Kashim Shettima

The Fear Of Shettima: Atiku, Amaechi Draws New Blueprint to Battle Tinubu in 2027

Dr, James Bwala

As Nigeria hurtles towards the 2027 general elections, a palpable tension underlines the political landscape. Behind closed doors, strategic alignments and calculated meetings signal a brewing contest not just between the established parties but within their ranks as well. Central to this unfolding drama is the All Progressives Congress (APC) presidential ticket’s choice of Kashim Shettima as Bola Tinubu’s running mate—a development that has stirred considerable anxiety among key opposition players, particularly within the African Democratic Congress (ADC). From the grapevine, the opposition’s focus is less on Tinubu himself and more on the formidable political threat posed by Vice President Kashim Shettima. This was further examined on how Atiku Abubakar and Rotimi Amaechi are crafting a new political blueprint to counter this threat, reshaping Nigeria’s electoral battlefield well before votes are cast in 2027.

At the centre of the 2027 electoral chessboard lies the ADC’s conscious strategy to challenge the APC from both inside and outside traditional power structures. The party’s recent activities unveil a concerted attempt to recalibrate Nigeria’s political dynamics, particularly in the North, where the influence of Kashim Shettima is most pronounced. The narrative emerging from the discreet yet intense meetings involving Atiku Abubakar and other political heavyweights underscores the gravity with which the opposition views Shettima’s ascendancy. This fear is not merely individual or symbolic; it is reflective of a deeper recognition that Shettima represents a rejuvenated force capable of galvanising northern politics in favour of the APC’s continuity.

To appreciate why Shettima evokes such apprehension, one must examine his political trajectory and the implications of his vice-presidential nomination. Kashim Shettima, former governor of Borno State and a stalwart within the APC, commands significant respect and influence in the northern geopolitical zones. His governance record in Borno State, marked by efforts to combat insurgency and foster development amid adversity, has elevated him beyond mere party politics to a symbol of resilience and leadership. Aligning with Tinubu, a southern powerbroker, Shettima crafts a cross-regional ticket designed to bridge Nigeria’s ethno-political divides—a factor that considerably strengthens their presidential bid’s appeal.

It is precisely this potent combination that has galvanised opposition figures like Atiku Abubakar, Amaechi, and their allies to devise meticulous plans aimed at counterbalancing Shettima’s rise. Their behind-the-scenes meetings—such as Atiku’s engagement with Senator Abdullaziz Abubakar Yari and Amaechi’s consultations with political heavyweights like Aminu Waziri Tambuwal and Abubakar Malami—reflect a deliberate effort to consolidate northern interests under alternative leadership. These alliances betray an understanding that cracking the APC’s grip on northern votes necessitates presenting credible and relatable candidates who can align with the electorate’s aspirations.

The opposition’s tactical moves extend beyond mere coalition-building. There is a clear orchestration of information campaigns targeting Shettima’s political and personal history meant to erode his public image. By deploying media platforms with carefully curated narratives, the opposition seeks to undermine Shettima’s credibility, thereby diluting the APC’s combined ticket strength. This strategic attack underscores a keen political calculation: that diminishing Shettima’s influence is the key to destabilising Tinubu’s overall electoral equation. It is telling that these efforts focus primarily on Shettima rather than Tinubu, highlighting the vice-presidential candidate’s important role in this contest.

This intense focus on Shettima also exposes evolving trends in Nigerian politics, where the vice-presidential candidate’s profile increasingly affects electoral outcomes. Traditionally, presidential candidates have dominated public discourse, but Shettima’s selection signals a shift—showcasing how regional representation, personal charisma, and security credentials can decisively sway voter sentiment. The opposition’s acknowledgement of this reality by tailoring their strategies accordingly reflects a nuanced understanding of Nigeria’s complex electoral calculus.

However, it is necessary to recognise that the opposition’s blueprint is not merely reactionary but also visionary. The alliances being put in place with certain APC stalwarts and influential figures across the political spectrum, Atiku and Amaechi are attempting to forge a broader coalition transcending ethnic, religious and party lines. This approach aims to neutralise the APC’s hegemonic hold by offering a compelling alternative that speaks to national unity and inclusive governance. Such a vision could impact powerfully with an electorate weary of entrenched partisanship and yearning for effective leadership.

Critics may argue that this intense preoccupation with Shettima risks overshadowing substantive policy debates and reducing the election to personality clashes. While this concern merits consideration, it is important to recognise that Nigerian politics historically intertwines personalities with policy, given the country’s diverse socio-political fabric. Hence, electoral strategies naturally gravitate towards leveraging influential individuals who embody broader ideological and regional narratives. In this context, the opposition’s emphasis on Shettima is a pragmatic response to the realities of Nigerian electoral politics, not an aberration.

The proactive steps being taken by the ADC and its allies demonstrate a mature political strategy rooted in early engagement and organised planning. By initiating conversations and stakeholder engagements well ahead of 2027, they are positioning themselves to avoid last-minute surprises and build momentum over time. This long-term approach contrasts with episodic and reactionary campaign tactics seen in past elections, underscoring a strategic evolution within Nigeria’s opposition circles.

The emergence of Kashim Shettima as Bola Tinubu’s running mate has profoundly reshaped the dynamics of Nigeria’s 2027 presidential race. The opposition’s fear, centred on Shettima rather than Tinubu, is a testament to the vice-presidential candidate’s political capital and symbolic weight. Atiku Abubakar’s and Rotimi Amaechi’s engagement in intricate political manoeuvres and alliance-building exemplify a sophisticated blueprint designed to counter the APC’s strengthened ticket. This evolving scenario highlights the changing nature of Nigerian politics, where regional representation, personal influence, and strategic coalition-building will likely determine electoral success. 

As the 2027 elections approach, Nigerian voters and political observers alike should watch closely how these behind-the-scenes calculations translate into public campaigns and ultimately shape the nation’s democratic trajectory. The battle against Shettima—and by extension, the APC—has only just begun, promising a fiercely contested and consequential electoral season ahead.

* James Bwala, PhD, writes from Abuja.

The Fear Of Shettima: Atiku, Amaechi Draws New Blueprint to Battle Tinubu in 2027

Continue Reading

Politics

Kashim Shettima: When Loyalty Pays

Published

6 days ago

on

July 11, 2026

By

Vice President, Kashim Shettima

Kashim Shettima: When Loyalty Pays

By: Dr James Bwala

In Nigerian politics, loyalty is frequently tested, and the allegiance of political actors can sway as swiftly as public opinion. Yet, amidst this volatility, we stood, and our steadfastness not only shaped the trajectory of Tinubu and Shettima’s alliances but also solidified the very foundation of their successful leadership during the last three years of the administration. Vice President Kashim Shettima’s emergence again as President Bola Tinubu’s running mate for the 2027 elections is a vivid testament to his strategic stewardship, loyalty and partnership. If there are any lessons we learnt from VP Kashim Shettima, they are his calmness in the face of a storm. 

READ ALSO: https://newsng.ng/special-report-when-governor-zulum-announces-government-plans-to-employ-50-youths-each-across-27-local-governments-in-borno/

VP Kashim Shettima epitomises the indispensable pillar of Tinubu’s ticket, embodying resilience, dedication, and a vision that transcends mere political expediency. His journey together with Tinubu is not just a political coincidence but a deliberate and principled alliance—a bond forged through trials, mutual respect, and shared aspirations for Nigeria’s future.

For the gravity of Kashim Shettima’s role in the Tinubu ticket, it is essential to understand the context within which their partnership flourished. Nigerian politics, much like any other democratic system, is riddled with factionalism, shifting loyalties, and the constant jockeying for power and influence. Against this backdrop, many politicians have allied themselves opportunistically, aligning only when it benefits their immediate ambitions. 

And during those days even those of us who are learning to hold the robes, some of us, have given way. By contrast, my unwavering support for Shettima over the years and in those trying moments has never wavered, even when circumstances appeared unfavourable. This constancy is not simply a matter of personal affinity but a calculated commitment grounded in conviction and trust—qualities that are rare and invaluable in Nigerian political circles, as my brother and friend Hon. Yunus Mairami, who has been following my articles, penned in his few lines with prayers that swell my emotions. 

READ ALSO:https://newsng.ng/special-report-when-governor-zulum-announces-government-plans-to-employ-50-youths-each-across-27-local-governments-in-borno/

For me, Kashim Shettima’s significance on this ticket extends beyond his political stature or the formal title he now holds as vice president. He symbolises the “life of the Tinubu ticket” because he brings more than just electoral advantage; he brings a narrative of resilience and authenticity. When the path appeared uncertain, when scepticism about the Muslim-Muslim ticket permeated political discourse, and when other politicians scrambled to reposition themselves in pursuit of favour, I remained resolutely by Shettima’s side. Not because I thought this day would come, but I knew it would come, and here we are. 

This was not naive optimism but a deliberate stance anchored in deep belief—not only in his character but also in the strategic soundness of our coalition. Political battles are often likened to storms, and while many sought shelter amid the tempest, we chose to stand firm on a solid ground of trust and shared purpose. The biblical story of King David and his men in the Cave of Adullam serves as an apt metaphor for this loyalty. David’s companions who endured hardship alongside him in the cave were those who ultimately ascended with him to the palace. 

The truth about leadership and loyalty is that those who remain steadfast during moments of obscurity and struggle deserve to share in the rewards of victory. Although they said this principle does not reflect the Nigerian system, I believe this principle guides my relationship with Shettima. He never forgets. Our alliance was not forged out of convenience or fleeting advantage but through shared battles and unyielding faith. Such loyalty is not blind allegiance; it is a recognition of genuine leadership and an affirmation of enduring values.

READ ALSO: https://newsng.ng/special-report-when-governor-zulum-announces-government-plans-to-employ-50-youths-each-across-27-local-governments-in-borno/

I met critics, a lot of them, on this journey, who asked me about the viability of the Muslim-Muslim ticket in the Nigerian political reality, given the country’s complex religious and ethnic diversity. They argue that such a pairing risks alienating significant constituencies and igniting tensions. I have stood on the ground that, if it did not happen in 2023, it will not happen in 2027 because Nigeria is more than a religious chessboard. Today, we celebrate again the selection of Shettima as Tinubu’s running mate. This is a strategic masterstroke that defies simplistic interpretations based solely on identity politics. It is a testament to the maturity and vision of both leaders, signifying a commitment to unity, national integration, and the transcendence of divisive narratives. Shettima’s track record in the last three years demonstrates his capacity for effective governance and resilience in the face of adversity. These qualities make him not just a symbol of loyalty but an embodiment of a competent and courageous leader. 

The political landscape in Nigeria demands partnerships that are rooted in trust and mutual respect rather than transactional calculations. The political arena is deeply impacted by intrigue, shifting allegiances, and often self-serving manoeuvres. In such an environment, Shettima’s steadfastness provides a stable anchor for the Tinubu campaign. When many doubted his place on the ticket, and when internal forces applied pressure to reconsider the alliance, my support never faltered. This is the hallmark of a loyal soldier—one who does not waver in the face of adversity but remains committed to the cause and the leader. Such loyalty is not merely symbolic; it is a strategic asset that strengthens the ticket’s cohesion and credibility.

READ ALSO: https://newsng.ng/special-report-when-governor-zulum-announces-government-plans-to-employ-50-youths-each-across-27-local-governments-in-borno/

The role of loyalty in political success cannot be overstated. Historical and contemporary examples alike illustrate that the most enduring political triumphs are often those built on relationships of trust and shared sacrifice. Loyalty fosters unity, mitigates internal divisions, and galvanises collective effort towards common goals. In the case of Tinubu and Shettima, this loyalty is not unidirectional. Shettima himself has publicly acknowledged the steadfastness of his supporters and allies, recognising that political victories are the product of collaborative dedication. This mutual recognition fortifies the partnership, enhancing its resilience against external pressures and internal dissent.

The congratulatory messages I have received from many quarters underscore a broader recognition of Shettima’s important role on Tinubu’s ticket. His selection and the affirmations are not mere pleasantries but reflections of the political community’s acknowledgement of his contributions and potential. The prayers for me to be among the recipients of a victory award signify solidarity and confidence in the shared journey towards electoral success. It is a collective endorsement of the values of loyalty, perseverance, and principled leadership that Shettima embodies. Such communal validation reinforces the argument that Shettima is indeed the lifeblood of the Tinubu ticket. I salute the President for the courage and belief he has in Kashim Shettima. 

READ ALSO: https://newsng.ng/special-report-when-governor-zulum-announces-government-plans-to-employ-50-youths-each-across-27-local-governments-in-borno/

The emergence of Vice President Kashim Shettima as President Tinubu’s running mate for the 2027 elections is a historic and strategically sound development. It is the culmination of a loyal partnership forged through mutual respect, shared struggles, and an unwavering belief in a common vision for Nigeria. Against the backdrop of political opportunism and uncertainty, Shettima stands out as a figure of integrity and resilience—qualities that are indispensable for sustaining a successful political alliance and for guiding Nigeria towards stability and progress. 

Loyalty nourishes leadership and ensures that those who endure together triumph together. With Vice President Kashim Shettima, the Tinubu ticket is not merely positioned to win an election; it is poised to lead Nigeria with a united and purposeful heart. I congratulate him now and always, confident that our shared commitment will yield victory and a lasting legacy come 2027.

Kashim Shettima: When Loyalty Pays

Continue Reading

Trending

Verified by MonsterInsights