National News
The Kano Model: How Faith Leaders Can Fight Disinformation in Nigeria and West Africa
The Kano Model: How Faith Leaders Can Fight Disinformation in Nigeria and West Africa
By Senator Iroegbu
In an era where falsehoods outpace truth, Nigeria and its Sahel neighbours find themselves on a perilous digital battleground. Disinformation threatens democracy, national security, and social harmony across West Africa. False narratives, amplified by social media and coordinated networks with ties to external powers, undermine elections, stoke ethnic tensions, and corrode public trust in democracy and institutions.
As Nigeria approaches the 2027 elections, this menace has assumed sharper geopolitical contours. External powers and their allies in the Sahel have weaponised information to justify coups, weaken democracies, and polarise opinion. Yet the most potent antidote to this weaponised falsehood may not lie in new laws or sophisticated algorithms—it may reside in the pulpit, the minaret, and the palace.
Last month in Kano, a historic moment unfolded. Sheikh Ibrahim Khalil, Chairman of the Kano State Council of Ulama, declared that spreading fake news is a sin in Islam, equating it with fabricating lies—an act forbidden by the Qur’an. “Islam forbids the fabrication of lies. Therefore, creating and spreading fake news is prohibited,” he said. He made this declaration at a two-day fact-checking workshop organised by Alkalanci, a Hausa-language platform dedicated to countering misinformation. The event, attended by Islamic scholars, imams, and representatives of His Highness, the Emir of Kano, Muhammad Sanusi II, was more than a media literacy session—it was a moral awakening.
Representing the Emir, Alhaji Abbas Dalhatu reminded participants that even Prophet Suleiman verified reports before acting, as recorded in the Qur’an. The message was unmistakable: truth verification is not a Western construct but a divine injunction. This gathering reframes the battle for truth as a moral, civic, and spiritual duty, placing religious and traditional leaders at the heart of national resilience.
Religious and traditional leaders—imams, pastors, and traditional rulers—wield immense influence across Nigeria and West Africa. When they speak, millions listen. Their voices reach deeper into citizens’ hearts than any government circular or press release could. Harnessing this moral authority to promote truth, critical thinking, and responsible information sharing could be transformative. Imagine Friday sermons and Sunday homilies urging congregants to verify stories before forwarding them. Picture traditional rulers collaborating with fact-checking organisations to dispel rumours before they ignite conflict. This approach fuses cultural authenticity with digital resilience—a uniquely African response to a global problem. By rooting fact-checking in faith and tradition, truth becomes not just a civic virtue but a sacred obligation.
Across the Sahel, disinformation has evolved into a weapon of war. In Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger, false narratives spread through encrypted platforms and foreign-funded networks have justified coups, vilified democratic institutions, and fostered hostility toward neighbouring states like Nigeria and ECOWAS. These campaigns, often orchestrated by external actors seeking geopolitical leverage, prey on citizens by exploiting anti-Western sentiments, poverty, and religious/ethnic mistrust. Left unchecked, they could destabilise Nigeria’s fragile unity and sow doubt ahead of the 2027 elections. This is not just Nigeria’s problem—it’s regional. A coordinated response based on the Kano Model could combat this epidemic of falsehood and ensure stability across the Sahel.
Nigeria’s most effective response must mobilise faith-based and traditional networks. The Kano initiative offers a blueprint for building collective immunity against falsehood. To protect democracy and stability, Nigeria must replicate the model nationwide by conducting fact-checking and media literacy workshops for clerics, traditional and youth leaders, ensuring that religious and cultural figures become trusted guardians of truth. Media literacy should be institutionalised by integrating digital ethics and information verification into religious education, civic studies, and community training so truth-telling becomes as routine as prayer or civic duty. Collaboration with fact-checking platforms must deepen to debunk falsehoods in local languages, ensuring truth reaches the grassroots. Promoting responsible digital citizenship is equally vital—citizens must learn to pause, verify, and reflect before sharing information online, understanding that misinformation is not only harmful but sinful and unpatriotic.
Our fight against disinformation cannot be a one-time effort, and we must be prepared to adapt our strategies as the threat evolves. We must continuously educate Nigerians on the geopolitical dimensions of disinformation and strengthen independent media. By doing so, we can ensure that our citizens are informed, vigilant, and far harder to manipulate.
The lessons from Kano are not just for Nigeria. They resonate across West Africa, where democracies face similar vulnerabilities. The region’s stability depends on its ability to immunise citizens against the poisons of falsehood. By anchoring truth in spiritual and communal values, Nigeria can lead a regional movement where faith becomes the firewall against foreign propaganda and internal division. This is a battle we must fight together, and the clerics of Kano have shown us the way.
Sheikh Khalil’s pronouncement transforms the fight against fake news from a technical challenge into a moral crusade. When verification becomes worship and fact-checking becomes an act of faith, information warfare meets an adversary it cannot easily defeat: the human conscience guided by truth. The workshop in Kano may have seemed modest—a few dozen clerics gathered for two days—but history often turns on such quiet revolutions. By awakening moral authorities to the dangers of disinformation, it has lit a spark that could protect not only Nigeria’s democracy but also the integrity of the entire Sahel.
As the 2027 elections approach and the Sahel remains unstable, the task before Nigeria’s leaders—political, religious, and traditional—is straightforward. This is not merely about regulating speech or policing the internet; it is about defending truth itself, the foundation upon which democracy, peace, and unity stand. The clerics of Kano have shown the way. The question now is whether the rest of Nigeria—and indeed West Africa—will follow. The battle for truth has found its warriors. May their voices multiply.
Senator Iroegbu is a security, geopolitics and development analyst. Email: Senator.iroegbu@yahoo.co.uk
The Kano Model: How Faith Leaders Can Fight Disinformation in Nigeria and West Africa
National News
FG Declares October 1 Public Holiday as Nigeria Mark’s 66th Independence Anniversary
FG Declares October 1 Public Holiday as Nigeria Mark’s 66th Independence Anniversary
By: Michael Mike
The Federal Government has declared Thursday, October 1, 2026, a public holiday to commemorate Nigeria’s 66th Independence Anniversary.
The Minister of Interior, Dr. Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo, announced the declaration on behalf of the Federal Government in a statement issued on Wednesday by the Permanent Secretary of the Ministry, Dr. Magdalene Ajani.
The minister congratulated Nigerians at home and abroad, urging citizens to use the anniversary to reflect on the nation’s journey since independence and renew their commitment to building a more united, peaceful and prosperous country.
Tunji-Ojo emphasised the importance of peace and stability to national development, calling on Nigerians to emulate the patriotism and love for country demonstrated by the nation’s founding fathers.
He said Nigeria’s diversity remains a major strength and expressed optimism that a better and more prosperous nation is achievable through collective determination.
“As we celebrate 66 years of our independence, we should always remember that there is hope for our country and our diversity is our strength, and our collective determination remains the foundation upon which a stronger and more prosperous nation will be built,” the minister said.
The minister also reaffirmed the Federal Government’s commitment to the Renewed Hope Agenda of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, stating that the administration would continue working towards a better Nigeria for all citizens.
He urged Nigerians to make the Independence anniversary an opportunity to demonstrate unity, patriotism, peaceful coexistence and mutual respect, while honouring the sacrifices of the country’s past heroes.
Tunji-Ojo further assured citizens that the Federal Government remains committed to strengthening national security, improving public safety and creating an environment where Nigerians can live, work and pursue their legitimate aspirations with confidence.
Nigeria gained independence from British colonial rule on October 1, 1960, and will mark its 66th Independence Anniversary on Thursday.
The minister wished Nigerians a happy 66th Independence Anniversary.
FG Declares October 1 Public Holiday as Nigeria Mark’s 66th Independence Anniversary
National News
AT 3RD AFRICA MINERALS STRATEGY GROUP HIGH-LEVEL ROUNDTABLE
AT 3RD AFRICA MINERALS STRATEGY GROUP HIGH-LEVEL ROUNDTABLE
President Tinubu Rallies Aggressive Alliance To Guard Africa’s Mineral Wealth
** *Charges continent to stop exporting wealth, start profiting from its own resources
** *Says Africa’s future being fashioned from minerals must have room for continent’s ambition
By: Our Reporter
President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has called for a fresh continental push to end the historical exploitation of Africa’s critical mineral resources, urging African nations to unite and halt the export of raw materials.
Accordingly, he demanded an aggressive alliance among African countries to ensure the continent transitions from a mere supplier of raw minerals to a hub for local processing, manufacturing, and value addition.
The Nigerian leader made the call on Monday in New York, United States, during the AMSG High-Level Roundtable on Critical Minerals Development in Africa held on the sidelines of the ongoing 81st Session of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA).
Convened and chaired by President Tinubu, his deputy, Vice President Kashim Shettima, alongside AMSG Chairman and Nigeria’s Minister of Solid Minerals, Dr. Dele Alake, the high-level dialogue, themed, “From Resources to Wealth: Continental Cooperation for Mineral Value Addition, Data Sovereignty, Innovative Financing and Critical Minerals Security,” focuses on transforming the continent’s mineral wealth into sustainable economic growth.
In his address delivered by Senator Shettima at the Roundtable, the President told African leaders and other stakeholders that the continent cannot claim to be wealthy while its children wallow in poverty amid mines that enrich the world.
“For generations, Africa has furnished the materials of prosperity elsewhere. Our duty is to ensure that the future being fashioned from African minerals has room for African ambition,” he declared.
President Tinubu regretted that mineral-rich communities lack infrastructure, jobs, and a stake in their own wealth at a time when global demand for clean energy, AI, and advanced manufacturing has made Africa’s critical minerals—like cobalt, copper, lithium, and rare earth elements—indispensable to global supply chains and economic security.
The answer to such deprivation, he observed, “must be processing, refining, batteries, components, African technologies and competitive skills,” noting that “the worth of a mine must be counted in the lives it improves.
“Jobs, industries, infrastructure, technology transfer, African enterprise participation and prosperity retained across generations must measure our progress from resources to wealth,” he maintained.
The Nigerian leader warned, however, that no African country can achieve this alone, adding that competing through lower royalties, weaker local content, and excessive concessions will only weaken the continent’s negotiating power.
“Fragmentation leaves us exporting raw materials and buying finished goods at a premium. Cooperation gives our markets scale, our industries integration, our financing reach and our negotiations authority,” he said.
Back home, the President noted that Nigeria must require local value addition for new mining licenses, strengthen geological data and investor access, organize artisanal miners into cooperatives, combat illegal mining, and improve regulatory accountability
“Revenue rose from approximately ₦6 billion in 2023 to over ₦38 billion in 2024 and between ₦68.1 billion and ₦70 billion in 2025. Major foreign investment commitments and large-scale lithium processing capacity developed and commissioned in Nasarawa State demonstrate the possibilities,” he added.
He drew attention to his administration’s mining policy direction, which stipulates that minerals extracted in Nigeria must sustain Nigerian industries, workers, skills, and communities, saying ongoing reforms indicate that “firm terms can attract serious capital.”
Offering other African nations the Nigerian experience for adaptation across the continent, President Tinubu called for “reliable partnerships grounded in mutual benefit, shared responsibility, sovereign equality and respect for our priorities, with fair market access, industrial investment and technology partnerships that build African capabilities.”
He implored member countries of the AMSG to speak with one voice to promote Africa’s collective interest, insisting that reliability must never mean dependency, and partnership must never demand inequality.
On the Continental Integration and Economic Assurance Declaration adopted and signed at the Roundtable, the President said it must establish a predictable, investment-ready environment for Africa’s Strategic Mineral Corridors, harmonised policies, responsible investment and shared infrastructure.
He stated that the Declaration’s authority must survive the signing ceremony through a binding programme with timelines, financing, implementation and public accountability, even as he urged African nations to specify national and regional contributions; development finance institutions and sovereign investors to propose financing platforms.
Declaring the Roundtable open, the Nigerian leader spearheaded an aggressive alliance to retain the continent’s mineral wealth, saying, “Africa’s power resides in its people, markets and ingenuity. No outsider will organise our continent or place our industrial interests above their own. We must integrate our markets, mobilise African capital and negotiate with one voice wherever our interests converge.
“Our industrial growth can strengthen global prosperity, the energy transition and secure supply chains. Minerals confer no automatic prosperity; vision, investment and industry must earn it. Political will must turn mineral promise into enduring African wealth.”
Earlier, Chairman of the AMSG and Nigeria’s Minister of Minister of Solid Minerals, Mr. Dele Alake, said the group is proposing a Continental Integration and Economic Assurance Declaration (CIEAD) as a landmark continental framework designed to establish a unified architecture for Africa’s critical and solid minerals value chains.
He said the strength of the gathering reflected the journey and progress made in Africa’s solid minerals sector as manifested in the growth of the Africa Minerals Stategy Group (AMSG).
Alake urged African countries that have yet to join the group to do so in the bid to ensure synergy of efforts, ideas and resources needed for Africa’s natural resources.
He observed that Africa’s minerals ambitions cannot be realised by policy implementation alone as fully integrated partnership designed across financial transactions and infrastructure development as the way forward.
On his part, Kenya’s Minister of Blue Economy and Maritime Affairs, Mr. Hassan Ali Joho, underscored the importance of domestic resource mobilisation as a catalyst for solid mineral development in Africa and beyond.
He added that for members of the AMSG to achieve holistic transformation, members must stay transparent, competitive and work towards greater alignment of licensing procedure while respecting the sovereignty of member states of the group.
There were also contributions from representatives of the governments of Liberia, Chad and Tanzania, among other stakeholders.
AT 3RD AFRICA MINERALS STRATEGY GROUP HIGH-LEVEL ROUNDTABLE
National News
ECOWAS Court Turns to Media as Enforcement Gap Threatens Impact of Regional Justice
ECOWAS Court Turns to Media as Enforcement Gap Threatens Impact of Regional Justice
…Abuja workshop seeks to strengthen judicial reporting and public accountability over Member States’ compliance with court decisions
By: Michael Mike
The ECOWAS Community Court of Justice is seeking to strengthen the role of journalists in holding Member States accountable for implementing its judgments, as concerns persist over the enforcement of decisions issued by the regional judicial institution.
The President of the Court, Hon. Justice Ricardo Claudio Monteiro Gonçalves, made the call at the opening of a three-day training workshop for journalists from ECOWAS Member States, urging participants to use their media platforms to draw attention to governments’ obligations under regional treaties.
He said the Court’s existing enforcement mechanism places responsibility for executing its judgments on Member States, but described the level of compliance as below expectation.
“Let me also urge you to use your media platforms to engage Member States on the need to faithfully implement the decisions of the Court in accordance with their treaty obligations,” Gonçalves said.
His remarks placed the spotlight on a central challenge facing regional justice: ensuring that judicial decisions translate into practical outcomes for individuals and communities.
The ECOWAS Community Court of Justice serves as a regional judicial institution within the Economic Community of West African States, with jurisdiction that includes human rights cases involving Member States.
Its judgments can address allegations of human rights violations and provide remedies to applicants. However, enforcement depends on mechanisms involving national authorities rather than the Court independently executing its own decisions.
Under Article 24 of the Court’s Supplementary Protocol, judgments are enforced through a writ of execution submitted by the Chief Registrar to the relevant Member State, where execution proceeds according to domestic civil procedure rules.
The Court has also explained in its jurisprudence that Member States have obligations to comply with its judgments, while its own authority to directly enforce those decisions is limited.
This arrangement makes cooperation between the regional institution and national authorities an important part of the enforcement process. Differences in domestic procedures, institutional capacity and the implementation of regional legal instruments can affect how judgments are carried out.
The Court has identified enforcement as an area requiring stronger coordination with national institutions. In 2026, it held bilateral engagements with national authorities in countries including Guinea, Sierra Leone and Nigeria to discuss compliance, institutional cooperation and practical enforcement challenges.
These engagements form part of broader efforts to improve the implementation of decisions across the region.
Gonçalves said limited public understanding of the Court’s mandate, procedures, jurisdiction and judgments was partly linked to gaps in media coverage.
He stressed that journalists need a sound understanding of the institution’s composition, structure and legal responsibilities to communicate its work accurately.
The president said the workshop was designed to improve judicial reporting and establish a network of journalists across the ECOWAS region who would report regularly on the Court’s activities.
“This training is, therefore, very important for the Community Court of Justice,” he said.
He expressed confidence that contributions from the Court’s Registry and Research Departments, alongside technical experts in journalism and judicial reporting, would help achieve the initiative’s objectives.
The workshop is expected to strengthen participants’ ability to explain court proceedings, interpret judgments and communicate the implications of regional judicial decisions to the public.
The media training comes amid continuing institutional efforts to improve compliance with ECOWAS Court judgments through closer engagement with national enforcement authorities.
In February 2026, the Court convened a meeting with Nigerian authorities on the status of enforcement of its decisions. Similar engagements in Sierra Leone and Guinea focused on cooperation, identifying implementation challenges and strengthening coordination between the Court and national institutions.
A further regional meeting of Competent National Authorities was scheduled in Cotonou, Benin, in June 2026, as part of efforts to develop a collaborative framework for enforcement.
The initiatives reflect the importance of national institutions in carrying out regional judgments and the need for more consistent procedures across jurisdictions.
Against this background, the Court’s engagement with journalists introduces a public communication dimension to its compliance efforts, encouraging media professionals to explain the obligations arising from judgments and report on implementation.
The training brought together journalists drawn primarily from national broadcast media organisations across 12 ECOWAS Member States.
The participating countries are Benin, Cabo Verde, Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Guinea-Bissau, Guinea, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Senegal, The Gambia, Togo and Nigeria.
The initiative forms part of the Court’s Annual Cascade Workplan and is aligned with its Strategic Plan 2026–2030.
In particular, it supports Strategic Goal 4, which focuses on transparency, stakeholder engagement and strategic accountability, as well as Strategic Objective 4.2, which seeks to strengthen platforms for regular engagement with stakeholders.
Through the training, the Court aims to expand public awareness of its work and encourage sustained reporting on its judgments and activities.
For the participating journalists, the task extends beyond covering courtroom proceedings to explaining what decisions mean, which institutions are responsible for implementation and what progress is being made in giving effect to the Court’s rulings.
ECOWAS Court Turns to Media as Enforcement Gap Threatens Impact of Regional Justice
…Abuja workshop seeks to strengthen judicial reporting and public accountability over Member States’ compliance with court decisions
By: Michael Mike
The ECOWAS Community Court of Justice is seeking to strengthen the role of journalists in holding Member States accountable for implementing its judgments, as concerns persist over the enforcement of decisions issued by the regional judicial institution.
The President of the Court, Hon. Justice Ricardo Claudio Monteiro Gonçalves, made the call at the opening of a three-day training workshop for journalists from ECOWAS Member States, urging participants to use their media platforms to draw attention to governments’ obligations under regional treaties.
He said the Court’s existing enforcement mechanism places responsibility for executing its judgments on Member States, but described the level of compliance as below expectation.
“Let me also urge you to use your media platforms to engage Member States on the need to faithfully implement the decisions of the Court in accordance with their treaty obligations,” Gonçalves said.
His remarks placed the spotlight on a central challenge facing regional justice: ensuring that judicial decisions translate into practical outcomes for individuals and communities.
The ECOWAS Community Court of Justice serves as a regional judicial institution within the Economic Community of West African States, with jurisdiction that includes human rights cases involving Member States.
Its judgments can address allegations of human rights violations and provide remedies to applicants. However, enforcement depends on mechanisms involving national authorities rather than the Court independently executing its own decisions.
Under Article 24 of the Court’s Supplementary Protocol, judgments are enforced through a writ of execution submitted by the Chief Registrar to the relevant Member State, where execution proceeds according to domestic civil procedure rules.
The Court has also explained in its jurisprudence that Member States have obligations to comply with its judgments, while its own authority to directly enforce those decisions is limited.
This arrangement makes cooperation between the regional institution and national authorities an important part of the enforcement process. Differences in domestic procedures, institutional capacity and the implementation of regional legal instruments can affect how judgments are carried out.
The Court has identified enforcement as an area requiring stronger coordination with national institutions. In 2026, it held bilateral engagements with national authorities in countries including Guinea, Sierra Leone and Nigeria to discuss compliance, institutional cooperation and practical enforcement challenges.
These engagements form part of broader efforts to improve the implementation of decisions across the region.
Gonçalves said limited public understanding of the Court’s mandate, procedures, jurisdiction and judgments was partly linked to gaps in media coverage.
He stressed that journalists need a sound understanding of the institution’s composition, structure and legal responsibilities to communicate its work accurately.
The president said the workshop was designed to improve judicial reporting and establish a network of journalists across the ECOWAS region who would report regularly on the Court’s activities.
“This training is, therefore, very important for the Community Court of Justice,” he said.
He expressed confidence that contributions from the Court’s Registry and Research Departments, alongside technical experts in journalism and judicial reporting, would help achieve the initiative’s objectives.
The workshop is expected to strengthen participants’ ability to explain court proceedings, interpret judgments and communicate the implications of regional judicial decisions to the public.
The media training comes amid continuing institutional efforts to improve compliance with ECOWAS Court judgments through closer engagement with national enforcement authorities.
In February 2026, the Court convened a meeting with Nigerian authorities on the status of enforcement of its decisions. Similar engagements in Sierra Leone and Guinea focused on cooperation, identifying implementation challenges and strengthening coordination between the Court and national institutions.
A further regional meeting of Competent National Authorities was scheduled in Cotonou, Benin, in June 2026, as part of efforts to develop a collaborative framework for enforcement.
The initiatives reflect the importance of national institutions in carrying out regional judgments and the need for more consistent procedures across jurisdictions.
Against this background, the Court’s engagement with journalists introduces a public communication dimension to its compliance efforts, encouraging media professionals to explain the obligations arising from judgments and report on implementation.
The training brought together journalists drawn primarily from national broadcast media organisations across 12 ECOWAS Member States.
The participating countries are Benin, Cabo Verde, Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Guinea-Bissau, Guinea, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Senegal, The Gambia, Togo and Nigeria.
The initiative forms part of the Court’s Annual Cascade Workplan and is aligned with its Strategic Plan 2026–2030.
In particular, it supports Strategic Goal 4, which focuses on transparency, stakeholder engagement and strategic accountability, as well as Strategic Objective 4.2, which seeks to strengthen platforms for regular engagement with stakeholders.
Through the training, the Court aims to expand public awareness of its work and encourage sustained reporting on its judgments and activities.
For the participating journalists, the task extends beyond covering courtroom proceedings to explaining what decisions mean, which institutions are responsible for implementation and what progress is being made in giving effect to the Court’s rulings.
ECOWAS Court Turns to Media as Enforcement Gap Threatens Impact of Regional Justice
-
News3 years agoRoger Federer’s Shock as DNA Results Reveal Myla and Charlene Are Not His Biological Children
-
Opinions5 years agoTHE PLIGHT OF FARIDA
-
News1 year agoFAILED COUP IN BURKINA FASO: HOW TRAORÉ NARROWLY ESCAPED ASSASSINATION PLOT AMID FOREIGN INTERFERENCE CLAIMS
-
News3 years agoEYN: Rev. Billi, Distortion of History, and The Living Tamarind Tree
-
Opinions5 years agoPOLICE CHARGE ROOMS, A MINTING PRESS
-
ACADEMICS3 years agoA History of Biu” (2015) and The Lingering Bura-Pabir Question (1)
-
Columns3 years agoArmy University Biu: There is certain interest, but certainly not from Borno.
-
Politics1 year ago2027: Why Hon. Midala Balami Must Go, as Youths in Hawul and Asikira/Uba Federal Constituency Reject ₦500,000 as Sallah Gift
