News
Wawa Barracks Is Not a Genocide Camp: Inside Nigeria’s Multi-Agency Counter-Terrorism Detention System
Wawa Barracks Is Not a Genocide Camp: Inside Nigeria’s Multi-Agency Counter-Terrorism Detention System
By: Zagazola Makama
Amid viral social media claims alleging “genocide by unlawful detention” and “secret execution of detainees” at the Wawa Military Cantonment in Niger State, findings by Zagazola Investigation reveal a very different reality: Wawa is not a secret torture camp, but one of Nigeria’s three structured, multi-agency detention and investigation hubs used for handling suspects arrested in terrorism-related operations.
The claims have gained traction on some fringe advocacy platforms. But investigation by Zagazola Investigation, involving interviews with senior security officials, lawyers involved in terrorism prosecutions, and independent monitors, shows a much different reality one backed by documentation, video, pictures, court records, and multilateral oversight.

Contrary to online report, the facility does not hold individuals simply for political dissent or IPOB sympathy. Instead, those kept at Wawa are individuals classified as high-risk terrorism suspects, already screened, investigated and recommended for prosecution under federal anti-terrorism law.
Rather than a clandestine “genocide camp,” Wawa Cantonment operates as one of the federally designated holding centres for terrorism suspects awaiting trial transferred from the Northeast joint operations theatre. Its detainees are not randomly arrested civilians, they are individuals classified after investigation as high-risk Boko Haram / ISWAP or other related terrorism suspects to be prosecuted under the Terrorism Prevention Act (2011, 2013, amended 2022).
The centre of the process is the Joint Investigation Centre (JIC), a multi-agency counterterrorism facility established to: “hold, screen, investigate and categorize suspected terrorists arrested by frontline units.”

They are screened and investigated by the Complex Casework Group( CCG) represented from Nigerian Army, Nigeria Police Force, Department of State Services, Defence Intelligence Agency NSCDC, NDLEA, Immigration and Office of Attorney General.
The CCG, a team of federal lawyers, vets every file and determines those that will be sent to sent to Kainji/Giwa for trial, those that will be rehabilitated through Operation Safe Corridor and those that required to be reintegrated are handed over to Borno State Government. Biometric data, case files, and legal opinions accompany every transfer.
After preliminary arrest at the frontline: Suspect is transferred to JIC with exhibits and initial report, Case file opened, investigators from multiple agencies interview the suspect, Federal High Court grants remand order for detention.
Therefore, contrary to online claims of torture and starvation, JIC operates under internationally monitored guidelines:
Zagazola found out that the inmate were fed three meals daily, with supplements for malnourished suspects Medical care
On-site clinic, referral to UMTH and 7 Div Hospital. TB cases are isolated and treated
while all detainees are issued new clothing, underwear, toiletries Psychosocial wellbeing
TV in cells, physical exercise times, library and skills acquisition.

While family link restoration message delivered to families through ICRC. Notably, children detained with mothers receive basic education, while adults undergo skills training: tailoring, cap-making, poultry, fish farming, barbing.
Senior Military official overseeing JIC operations: “We do not have authority to detain indefinitely. Every person here is under a court-issued remand order. We investigate; lawyers decide. We do not sentence.”
Barr. Ahmed Mainasara, federal terrorism prosecutor (AGF delegation): said There are no secret trials. We conduct legal reviews, issue remand orders, and ensure suspects’ rights are respected. The public simply does not understand the process.”
“Genocide requires intent to wipe out a people. Detention and prosecution of terrorism suspects is lawful. The word genocide is being misused for propaganda.”Mainasara said.
He said that the trial for terrorism cases are held inside military locations because witnesses and investigators cannot be exposed publicly. It is a security necessity, not secrecy.”he said.
ICRC representative, (name withheld): “We have unrestricted access to all detainees. Any claim that these places are ‘off the books’ is false.”
The narrative circulating online claims that hundreds were secretly executed.
Security officials clarified to Zagazola Investigation: “About 200 suspects have been tried and sentenced, not executed. Many are serving long sentences in Kainji Correctional Facility.” Court records reviewed include: FHC/ABJ/CR/21/2019, FHC/KNJ/CR/42/2022, among others.
Military top official overseeing the facilities, told Zagazola that the detention facility in Wawa Barracks, Niger State, is not an illegal facility as alleged. It is backed by a Remand Order issued by the Federal Government through the Federal Ministry of Justice for the continued detention of suspects such as high-profile Boko Haram terrorists, bandit leaders and members of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) pending the conclusion of their cases.
“The Nigerian Army’s role is purely to provide security and ensure the safety of the facility, its personnel and all individuals lawfully detained pending the completion of their trials. The trial of suspects in the facility is conducted by the Department of Public Prosecution (DPP) under the supervision of the Federal Ministry of Justice.
“These proceedings are transparently conducted in collaboration with the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), as well as the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). They are also regularly attended by other International Non-Governmental Organizations (INGOs), human rights observers and relevant stakeholders, ensuring strict adherence to the rule of law and international standards.
“Contrary to the false narrative being circulated, the outcomes of these trials are always made public through the media, reflecting the government’s commitment to accountability and transparency.
Zagazola Investigation found no evidence supporting claims of genocide, secret executions or unlawful detention at Wawa Cantonment. Instead, Nigeria operates a structured, multi-agency, court-regulated system that includes humanitarian oversight arguably one of the most transparent counter-terrorism detention models in Sub-Saharan Africa.
While detention timelines need improvement and more terrorism courts are required, the narrative of mass killing and genocide inside Wawa is false, and unsupported by evidence.
Zagazola Makama is a Counter Insurgency Expert and Security Analyst in the Lake Chad Region
Wawa Barracks Is Not a Genocide Camp: Inside Nigeria’s Multi-Agency Counter-Terrorism Detention System
News
EU, Nigeria Expand Cooperation on Migration, Security with €112m Support
EU, Nigeria Expand Cooperation on Migration, Security with €112m Support
By: Michael Mike
The European Union (EU) and Nigeria have reaffirmed their commitment to strengthening cooperation on migration management, security and regional stability, with the EU committing a combined €112 million to support migration-related and security initiatives in the country.
The commitment was highlighted during a visit by the European Commissioner for Internal Affairs and Migration, Mr Magnus Brunner, to Abuja on Tuesday, where he held high-level meetings with key Nigerian government officials.
Brunner met with the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu; Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Mr Lateef Fagbemi (SAN); Minister of Interior, Hon. Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo; and Minister of Humanitarian Affairs and Poverty Reduction, Dr Bernard Doro.
The EU said €66 million had recently been allocated to fund new migration-related projects, while another €26 million would support security interventions, including efforts to curb the proliferation of small arms and drug trafficking.
It also disclosed that it had adopted its first bilateral assistance measure to Nigeria under the European Peace Facility, committing €20 million to support the country’s counterterrorism efforts.
The development comes against the backdrop of growing cooperation between Nigeria and European institutions on migration management, particularly following the signing of the EU-Nigeria Readmission Agreement.
According to the EU, the partnership has recorded improvements in recent years through collaboration between Nigerian authorities and European agencies, including Europol, Eurojust and Frontex.
Brunner said the growing relationship reflected the importance Europe attached to Nigeria as a strategic partner in Africa.
“Nigeria is a key partner for Europe, and our ties are steadily growing stronger. Together we are turning dialogue into action: more security, better migration management, joining forces to bring results.
“We are turning the huge potential of our partnership into mutual benefit,” he said.
The EU said the visit also provided an opportunity to review the broader relationship between both sides, advance cooperation on shared priorities and explore areas of engagement beyond migration and security.
It noted that Nigeria and the EU shared a commitment to multilateralism and a rules-based international order, adding that their partnership had continued to expand in scope.
The relationship has gained further momentum following the eighth EU-Nigeria Ministerial Meeting held in Abuja in March, with the participation of the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Kaja Kallas.
The EU also highlighted the role of Team Europe, comprising the EU and its member states, in implementing its Global Gateway investment strategy in Nigeria through projects spanning several sectors.
It said Nigeria’s strategic position in West Africa and its wider regional influence made it an important partner in advancing regional economic cooperation, security, migration management and trade.
The commissioner’s visit is expected to further consolidate the partnership and lay the groundwork for deepe
EU, Nigeria Expand Cooperation on Migration, Security with €112m Support
News
DSS Intercept Weapons Shipment from Niger Republic, Recover 21 AK-47 Rifles, Four PKT Machine Guns in Sokoto
DSS Intercept Weapons Shipment from Niger Republic, Recover 21 AK-47 Rifles, Four PKT Machine Guns in Sokoto
By: Zagazola Makama
The Department Of State Security Service (DSS) have intercepted a large consignment of weapons and ammunition allegedly being smuggled from the Niger Republic to armed bandits operating in north-western Nigeria.
The interception, which took place on Tuesday, November 10, at Dawakawa in Goronyo Local Government Area of Sokoto State, followed a security operation targeting suspected weapons trafficking networks across the Nigeria-Niger border.
Security sources said the suspected smugglers were allegedly attempting to transport the weapons into Nigeria using camels, apparently exploiting remote routes and difficult terrain to evade security surveillance.
The operation led to the recovery of 21 AK-47 rifles, four PKT machine guns and 825 magazines.
The interception represents a significant disruption of an alleged cross-border weapons supply network suspected of facilitating the operations of armed bandit groups in the North-West.
The use of camels to transport the weapons highlights the increasingly unconventional methods employed by criminal networks to move arms and ammunition across porous border corridors.
The development also underscores the importance of sustained intelligence surveillance coordinated border security operations in preventing the movement of illicit weapons from neighbouring countries into Nigeria.
The recovered weapons are expected to provide security agencies with valuable leads towards identifying the suppliers, transporters and intended recipients of the consignment.
Zagazola report that several border communities along the Nigeria–Niger Republic frontier have emerged as vulnerable corridors for cross-border arms trafficking, bandit movements and other criminal activities, raising concerns over the security of Nigeria’s North-West.
The affected areas include Illela, Sabon Birni, Isa, Gudu and Tangaza in Sokoto State; Jibia, Kaita, Mai’Adua and Kongolam in Katsina; Zurmi and Shinkafi in Zamfara; as well as Kamba and Arewa Dandi in Kebbi State.
Security concerns around these border regions are linked to porous boundaries, informal trading networks and difficult-to-monitor rural terrain, which criminal networks like Bandits, Lakurawa and Boko Haram exploit for illicit activities.
The development reinforces the need for enhanced border surveillance, intelligence-sharing and coordinated operations to dismantle cross-border weapons supply networks.
Security agencies must also target the financiers and suppliers behind the trafficking networks rather than focusing solely on couriers.
DSS Intercept Weapons Shipment from Niger Republic, Recover 21 AK-47 Rifles, Four PKT Machine Guns in Sokoto
News
INEC Proposes Democratic Freedoms Compact to Safeguard 2027 Elections
INEC Proposes Democratic Freedoms Compact to Safeguard 2027 Elections
…NHRC warns of political intimidation, arbitrary arrests, hate speech; EU pledges support for protection of civic space
By: Michael Mike
The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has proposed a Democratic Freedoms Compact to safeguard fundamental human rights, protect civic space and strengthen public confidence ahead of the 2027 general election.
The proposed compact is designed to guarantee freedom of expression, association and political participation, promote inclusiveness, ensure electoral transparency and accountability, and prevent violence, intimidation and other human rights violations throughout the electoral process.
INEC Chairman, Prof. Joash Amupitan, SAN, unveiled the proposal in a keynote address delivered on his behalf by Dr Hassan Umar at the 2026 Civil Society and Human Rights Defenders Forum on the State of Human Rights in Abuja on Wednesday.
The forum, organised by the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) in collaboration with the European Union (EU), was themed, “Protecting Human Rights in Civic and Political Spaces in the 2027 Elections.”
Amupitan said the credibility of the 2027 elections would be determined not only by the conduct of voting and collation of results but also by the extent to which Nigerians could freely express their opinions, associate, campaign and participate in the political process without fear, discrimination or violence.
He warned that regular elections alone could not sustain democracy if citizens were denied the freedom to express dissenting views, organise, criticise government policies and hold public institutions accountable.
To address these concerns, the INEC chairman said the proposed compact would establish a framework for institutional conduct built around six critical commitments: protection of fundamental freedoms, inclusive participation, transparent elections, accountability for human rights violations, peaceful political competition and constructive engagement among stakeholders.
He called for stronger collaboration among INEC, the NHRC, security agencies, civil society organisations and the media to monitor, document and respond to violations before, during and after the elections.
Amupitan reaffirmed the commission’s commitment to conducting credible elections, ensuring equal treatment of political parties and candidates, strengthening transparency and promoting inclusive participation.
On the contentious issue of electronic transmission of election results, he maintained that the Electoral Act 2026 provided for electronic transmission, while INEC had developed guidelines to address possible technical and communication challenges.
He urged political parties, civil society organisations and other stakeholders to familiarise themselves with the commission’s guidelines and regulations to avoid misinterpretation of the procedures governing result transmission.
The INEC chairman also placed responsibility on security agencies to protect voters, candidates, election officials, observers and journalists, insisting that security personnel must operate professionally and impartially.
He said their presence at polling units and other electoral locations should reassure citizens and create a safe environment for participation rather than generate fear or intimidation.
Earlier, Executive Secretary of the NHRC, Chief Anthony Ojukwu, warned that Nigeria’s democratic space was facing mounting challenges that required urgent intervention as the country approached the 2027 general election.
Ojukwu identified political intimidation, arbitrary arrests, harassment of journalists and human rights defenders, hate speech, restrictions on civic participation and the exclusion of vulnerable groups as threats capable of undermining the credibility of the electoral process.
He said the commission convened the forum at a defining moment in Nigeria’s democratic journey, with the presidential and National Assembly elections scheduled for January 16, 2027, and governorship and State Houses of Assembly elections to follow on February 6.
According to him, the timing was particularly significant because political campaigns were already gathering momentum across the country, making the protection of civic and political freedoms increasingly urgent.
He stressed that democracy was not sustained by elections alone but by the freedom citizens enjoyed between elections to speak without fear, assemble peacefully, associate without obstruction and choose their leaders without intimidation.
Citing Sections 14, 39 and 40 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, Ojukwu said sovereignty belonged to the Nigerian people, while constitutional guarantees protected freedom of expression, association and peaceful assembly.
He also referenced the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, which guarantees citizens the right to participate freely in the governance of their country.
The NHRC boss expressed concern that civil society organisations, journalists and human rights defenders continued to operate in an increasingly difficult environment characterised by harassment, arbitrary arrests and the potential misuse of laws, including provisions of the Cybercrimes Act.
He further raised concerns over political and voter intimidation, exclusionary nomination fees that could prevent women, young people and persons with disabilities from contesting elections, hate speech, incitement and the apparent absence of accountability for electoral offences.
Ojukwu warned that failure to prosecute electoral offenders could encourage impunity and embolden perpetrators to undermine the electoral process.
He disclosed that the commission had established a comprehensive human rights monitoring architecture to track political developments and election-related violations as campaigns intensified.
The mechanisms include a Human Rights Situation Dashboard, a human rights advisory and an Election Situation Room designed to monitor intimidation, suppression of political participation, harassment of journalists and other oversight actors, as well as violations of fundamental freedoms.
He said the commission was finalising an advisory on protecting political space and the right to participation in Nigeria, describing it as a flagship contribution to strengthening human rights protection during the forthcoming elections.
The advisory follows earlier interventions by the commission, including its February 2025 advisory on the protection of freedom of expression, which raised concerns about the interpretation and possible misuse of the Cybercrimes Act.
Ojukwu also disclosed that the commission was documenting violations, preparing cases for investigation and engaging INEC, security agencies, the National Peace Committee and other relevant institutions to strengthen accountability.
He said the NHRC’s Election Situation Room would remain operational throughout the electoral period, while election-focused dashboards and bulletins would be published regularly to provide information on human rights developments.
The commission, he added, would deploy monitors to identified hotspots and establish legal aid partnerships to respond to violations during and after the elections.
He announced that the forum would be transformed into a structured platform for sustained engagement between the commission and civil society organisations, with quarterly meetings, early-warning information sharing and rapid-response mechanisms.
According to him, the arrangement would facilitate coordination between the NHRC’s Situation Room and the Civil Society Election Situation Room, strengthen protection for individuals targeted for exercising their rights and ensure that stakeholders are held accountable for their commitments.
He said the forum would also adopt an outcome statement containing recommendations and a roadmap to guide its activities before, during and after the 2027 elections.
Ojukwu urged civil society organisations and human rights defenders to take ownership of the proposed framework, stressing that they were not spectators in the electoral process but essential partners in defending democracy.
He also acknowledged legislative efforts to strengthen the commission’s mandate and improve the legal protection of human rights defenders, expressing optimism that the reforms would create a more enabling environment for their work.
The NHRC executive secretary maintained that election-related violations must attract consequences, warning that the absence of accountability would weaken public confidence and encourage further abuses.
He said: “When elections go without violence, it is because of the work done long before polling day. Work that is sometimes invisible to the public.”
He added that the protection of democracy required collective responsibility and sustained commitment from government institutions, political parties, security agencies, civil society and international partners.
Also speaking, the EU Ambassador and Head of Delegation to Nigeria and ECOWAS, Gautier Mignot, reaffirmed the European Union’s commitment to supporting Nigeria’s democratic institutions and protecting civic and political freedoms ahead of the 2027 general election.
Mignot described the forum’s theme as timely, particularly against the backdrop of reports of election-related violence, hate speech, political intimidation and restrictions on citizens’ fundamental rights.
He warned that such incidents could erode public trust in state institutions and discourage citizens from participating in the electoral process.
The ambassador said free civic and political spaces, including independent media, peaceful assemblies, public forums and civil society organisations, were essential to ensuring credible, transparent and inclusive elections.
According to him, these spaces enable citizens to access information, debate public issues, scrutinise candidates and hold elected leaders and public institutions accountable without fear of censorship or retaliation.
He added that an open civic environment also allowed civil society organisations and active citizens to monitor election administration, track campaign promises and challenge government interference in the democratic process.
Mignot said weakening these safeguards could undermine citizens’ right to meaningful political participation and create opportunities for the suppression of opposition voices and manipulation of democratic rules.
He therefore urged all Nigerian stakeholders, including government institutions, political parties, civil society organisations and the media, to play their respective roles in ensuring a free, fair and credible electoral process.
The EU ambassador disclosed that the partnership with the NHRC had continued since 2024, when the first joint engagement provided a platform for human rights defenders to assess the state of human rights in Nigeria and develop collective responses to challenges confronting them.
He said the second engagement, held as part of activities marking the NHRC’s 30th anniversary, focused on reviewing the country’s human rights record over three decades and identifying emerging challenges requiring sustained intervention.
Mignot described the current forum as a continuation of the strategic partnership, adding that the EU was also preparing a new project with additional funding to deepen its collaboration with the commission.
He pledged that the EU delegation would carefully examine the recommendations and roadmap emerging from the forum and share them with its authorities and member states for further consideration.
He assured Nigeria that the EU and its member states would remain reliable partners in supporting democracy, good governance and the protection of human rights during what he described as a crucial period for the country’s democratic development.
In a goodwill message delivered on behalf of the Chairman of the Inter-Party Advisory Council (IPAC), Alhaji Yusuf Dantale, Prince Chinedu Obi urged political parties and their supporters to embrace issue-based campaigns, political tolerance and responsible communication.
IPAC cautioned against electoral violence, hate speech, voter suppression and political intimidation, stressing that political opponents must be regarded as competitors rather than enemies.
The council also advocated greater inclusion of women, young people and persons with disabilities in the electoral process, while urging security agencies and other relevant institutions to discharge their responsibilities with professionalism and impartiality.
Dantale said public confidence in the electoral system would ultimately depend on whether institutions could guarantee that votes counted and that Nigerians were able to exercise their democratic rights freely.
The forum brought together representatives of government institutions, diplomatic missions, political parties, civil society organisations, the media and human rights groups to assess the state of human rights in Nigeria and develop practical strategies for protecting civic and political freedoms ahead of the 2027 general election.
INEC Proposes Democratic Freedoms Compact to Safeguard 2027 Elections
-
News3 years agoRoger Federer’s Shock as DNA Results Reveal Myla and Charlene Are Not His Biological Children
-
Opinions5 years agoTHE PLIGHT OF FARIDA
-
News2 years agoFAILED COUP IN BURKINA FASO: HOW TRAORÉ NARROWLY ESCAPED ASSASSINATION PLOT AMID FOREIGN INTERFERENCE CLAIMS
-
Opinions5 years agoPOLICE CHARGE ROOMS, A MINTING PRESS
-
News3 years agoEYN: Rev. Billi, Distortion of History, and The Living Tamarind Tree
-
ACADEMICS3 years agoA History of Biu” (2015) and The Lingering Bura-Pabir Question (1)
-
Columns3 years agoArmy University Biu: There is certain interest, but certainly not from Borno.
-
Politics1 year ago2027: Why Hon. Midala Balami Must Go, as Youths in Hawul and Asikira/Uba Federal Constituency Reject ₦500,000 as Sallah Gift
