News
Al-Shabaab weighs political pathway amid internal debate over Taliban model
Al-Shabaab weighs political pathway amid internal debate over Taliban model
By Zagazola Makama
A growing debate within Al-Shabaab’s media and ideological ecosystem over whether the Somali jihadist organisation could eventually follow a path similar to that of the Taliban in Afghanistan is raising questions about the group’s long-term strategic direction and the future of Somalia’s counter-insurgency campaign.
The emerging discussion is significant because it goes beyond the group’s traditional propaganda narrative. For the first time, elements associated with Al-Shabaab’s information network are openly examining the possibility of negotiations, political engagement and eventual interaction with the international community.
One of the figures associated with Al-Shabaab-affiliated media, identified by the alias Eng. Kurtun Hassan, has published two articles examining the possibility of a political transition and the lessons the group could draw from developments in Afghanistan.
The articles do not, on their own, constitute a formal declaration by Al-Shabaab. However, they have attracted attention because they raise substantive questions about whether an insurgent organisation that has spent nearly two decades fighting the Somali government could eventually seek a negotiated political settlement.
According to intelligence reporting cited by security sources, elements within the Al-Shabaab leadership may have already begun considering negotiations with the Federal Government of Somalia.
The reports indicate that discussions are allegedly being conducted around the possibility of using trusted foreign actors as intermediaries between Al-Shabaab and the Somali government.
The reported approach appears to be cautious, with the group allegedly waiting for what its leadership considers favourable political and security conditions before making any public announcement.
This is particularly important because Al-Shabaab has historically rejected the legitimacy of the Somali federal government and has sought to overthrow the existing political order through armed struggle. Any decision by senior commanders to explore negotiations would therefore represent a major departure from the organisation’s established strategy.
Security analysts, however, caution that exploratory contacts or internal discussions should not be confused with a final organisational decision.
Al-Shabaab is a complex organisation with military commanders, religious figures, financiers, clan-linked networks, political actors and an extensive propaganda apparatus. Differences within these components could influence whether any future negotiations gain the support of the wider leadership.
The Taliban experience appears to be an important reference point in the debate. After decades of conflict in Afghanistan, the Taliban eventually entered negotiations with the United States and other international actors before returning to power in Kabul in August 2021 following the collapse of the Afghan government.
For some within Al-Shabaab’s ideological and political circles, the Taliban experience may be viewed as evidence that an insurgent movement can move from armed opposition to political authority without necessarily disappearing as an organisation.
This could explain why developments in Afghanistan are reportedly receiving increased attention among senior Al-Shabaab members and sympathisers.
Sources indicate that members of the group are studying issues including governance, security structures, military organisation, public administration and economic production in Afghanistan. The interest is reportedly not limited to Afghanistan.
Developments in Syria are also being monitored, particularly questions surrounding armed groups, territorial control, governance structures and the transition from insurgency to political administration. The comparisons are significant because they suggest that sections of Al-Shabaab may be considering the question of what comes after insurgency.
Perhaps the most important aspect of the emerging discussion is the reported debate in areas under Al-Shabaab influence over whether the group could transform itself from an armed insurgent organisation into a governing authority.
In locations including Jilib, Bu’aale and Kunyoo Barrow, discussions are reportedly becoming increasingly open among members and sympathisers. The central question is reportedly whether Al-Shabaab possesses the organisational structures necessary to administer territory on a broader scale if it eventually abandons or reduces its armed campaign.
Supporters of the idea reportedly point to the organisation’s existing taxation systems, courts, security structures, religious administration and mechanisms for regulating economic activity in areas where it exercises influence. Some members are also said to compare Al-Shabaab’s organisational capabilities with armed factions that emerged during the Syrian conflict.
The argument reportedly being advanced by some sympathisers is that Al-Shabaab has developed a more coherent administrative structure than several other jihadist and insurgent organisations and could therefore potentially transform that structure into a political system.
Such claims, however, remain part of an internal ideological debate and should not be interpreted as evidence that a political transition has already been approved.
Al-Shabaab remains one of the most significant jihadist organisations operating in Africa.
Its strength is difficult to determine with precision because of the clandestine nature of the organisation and the movement of fighters between combat, logistical and support roles.
Some intelligence estimates put its overall membership at approximately 20,000, including about 12,000 armed combatants. The organisation also maintains a sophisticated financial system.
For years, Al-Shabaab has generated substantial revenue through taxation, extortion, illegal economic activities, checkpoints, commercial transactions and other sources.
Some assessments have placed its annual revenue at more than $100 million, although such estimates are difficult to independently verify. That financial strength has been one of the major factors sustaining the group’s insurgency.
However, the organisation has increasingly come under financial pressure as the Somali government, regional forces and international partners have intensified efforts to disrupt its revenue networks.
The targeting of financial facilitators, restrictions on money transfers and operations against taxation and extortion networks have reportedly complicated the group’s ability to maintain its previous level of financial freedom.
This could become an important factor in any future strategic decision by Al-Shabaab’s leadership.
The reported debate also comes against the background of continuing military pressure on Al-Shabaab. Somali security forces, supported by international and regional partners, have conducted sustained operations against the group, targeting its commanders, logistics networks, training facilities and territorial positions.
Although Al-Shabaab has demonstrated considerable resilience and retains the ability to launch attacks, conduct assassinations and impose influence over parts of rural Somalia, the conflict has also placed significant pressure on the organisation.
For the group’s leadership, the strategic calculation may therefore be changing. An insurgent movement can survive for many years without necessarily achieving its political objective. But maintaining an armed campaign indefinitely requires manpower, money, territorial access, popular support and the ability to replace commanders and fighters lost in combat.
The emergence of discussions about negotiations could therefore reflect a reassessment of whether military confrontation alone can deliver the group’s desired political outcome.
One of the most sensitive elements of the intelligence reporting is the suggestion that sections of Al-Shabaab may be reassessing its transnational jihadist ideology. For nearly two decades, Al-Shabaab has presented itself as part of the wider global jihadist movement. Its affiliation with Al-Qaeda has given the group an international ideological dimension beyond the Somali conflict.
Any decision to move towards a political settlement would therefore raise a fundamental question: Can Al-Shabaab participate in Somalia’s political system while maintaining the ideological framework that has justified its armed campaign?
This could become the most difficult issue in any negotiations. A political transition would potentially require compromises on governance, constitutional arrangements, security, territorial control and relations with the international community.
It could also generate internal resistance from commanders and hard-line ideological elements who regard negotiations with the Somali government as unacceptable.
The danger of overinterpreting the signals
Despite the significance of the emerging debate, security officials and analysts would need to exercise considerable caution.Al-Shabaab has an extensive propaganda apparatus capable of deliberately generating narratives designed to influence governments, local communities and international audiences.
Discussions about negotiations could therefore have multiple purposes. They could reflect a genuine internal strategic debate. They could be an attempt to test public reaction.
They could also represent efforts to create divisions within the Somali government or encourage the perception that the group is politically stronger than it actually is.
Another possibility is that pragmatic elements within the organisation are exploring political options while hard-line commanders remain committed to armed jihad. For that reason, the publication of articles by Al-Shabaab-affiliated writers should not automatically be treated as an official policy statement.
What would negotiations mean for Somalia?
If the intelligence reporting is eventually corroborated and Al-Shabaab formally agrees to negotiations, the consequences would be profound. For the Somali government, negotiations could offer an opportunity to reduce violence, expand state authority and encourage defections from the insurgency. But negotiations could also create serious political and security challenges.
The government would have to determine whether former fighters could be integrated into security institutions, whether political participation could be offered to former insurgents and how victims of Al-Shabaab violence would be addressed.
There would also be difficult questions surrounding justice, accountability and the future of commanders accused of serious crimes.
For neighbouring countries and international partners, any political transition would require careful monitoring to ensure that Al-Shabaab does not simply use negotiations to reorganise, rebuild its financial networks and emerge in a different form.
The emerging debate therefore represents an important intelligence and political development, but not yet a confirmed breakthrough.The most significant indicator would be whether the reported internal discussions eventually translate into an official decision by Al-Shabaab’s senior leadership.
That would require more than media articles or discussions among sympathisers.
It would likely become visible through changes in the group’s public messaging, contacts with intermediaries, reductions in attacks, movement of senior commanders, instructions to field units and eventually direct engagement with the Somali government. Until such indicators emerge, the Taliban comparison should be treated as a strategic discussion rather than an established roadmap.
Nevertheless, the fact that such a discussion is reportedly taking place within Al-Shabaab’s own media environment is noteworthy.
After nearly two decades of armed conflict, the organisation may be confronting the same strategic question that has faced several long-running insurgencies: whether victory can ultimately be achieved through continued warfare or whether survival and political influence require a transition into a different kind of movement.
For Somalia, that question could become one of the most consequential developments in the country’s long-running fight against Al-Shabaab.
At present, however, the evidence points to an emerging internal debate not a confirmed decision by Al-Shabaab to abandon armed jihad or enter negotiations. Further intelligence and independent corroboration will be required before such a strategic shift can be established with confidence.
Al-Shabaab weighs political pathway amid internal debate over Taliban model
EU, Nigeria Expand Cooperation on Migration, Security with €112m Support
By: Michael Mike
The European Union (EU) and Nigeria have reaffirmed their commitment to strengthening cooperation on migration management, security and regional stability, with the EU committing a combined €112 million to support migration-related and security initiatives in the country.
The commitment was highlighted during a visit by the European Commissioner for Internal Affairs and Migration, Mr Magnus Brunner, to Abuja on Tuesday, where he held high-level meetings with key Nigerian government officials.
Brunner met with the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu; Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Mr Lateef Fagbemi (SAN); Minister of Interior, Hon. Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo; and Minister of Humanitarian Affairs and Poverty Reduction, Dr Bernard Doro.
The EU said €66 million had recently been allocated to fund new migration-related projects, while another €26 million would support security interventions, including efforts to curb the proliferation of small arms and drug trafficking.
It also disclosed that it had adopted its first bilateral assistance measure to Nigeria under the European Peace Facility, committing €20 million to support the country’s counterterrorism efforts.
The development comes against the backdrop of growing cooperation between Nigeria and European institutions on migration management, particularly following the signing of the EU-Nigeria Readmission Agreement.
According to the EU, the partnership has recorded improvements in recent years through collaboration between Nigerian authorities and European agencies, including Europol, Eurojust and Frontex.
Brunner said the growing relationship reflected the importance Europe attached to Nigeria as a strategic partner in Africa.
“Nigeria is a key partner for Europe, and our ties are steadily growing stronger. Together we are turning dialogue into action: more security, better migration management, joining forces to bring results.
“We are turning the huge potential of our partnership into mutual benefit,” he said.
The EU said the visit also provided an opportunity to review the broader relationship between both sides, advance cooperation on shared priorities and explore areas of engagement beyond migration and security.
It noted that Nigeria and the EU shared a commitment to multilateralism and a rules-based international order, adding that their partnership had continued to expand in scope.
The relationship has gained further momentum following the eighth EU-Nigeria Ministerial Meeting held in Abuja in March, with the participation of the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Kaja Kallas.
The EU also highlighted the role of Team Europe, comprising the EU and its member states, in implementing its Global Gateway investment strategy in Nigeria through projects spanning several sectors.
It said Nigeria’s strategic position in West Africa and its wider regional influence made it an important partner in advancing regional economic cooperation, security, migration management and trade.
The commissioner’s visit is expected to further consolidate the partnership and lay the groundwork for deepe
EU, Nigeria Expand Cooperation on Migration, Security with €112m Support
News
DSS Intercept Weapons Shipment from Niger Republic, Recover 21 AK-47 Rifles, Four PKT Machine Guns in Sokoto
DSS Intercept Weapons Shipment from Niger Republic, Recover 21 AK-47 Rifles, Four PKT Machine Guns in Sokoto
By: Zagazola Makama
The Department Of State Security Service (DSS) have intercepted a large consignment of weapons and ammunition allegedly being smuggled from the Niger Republic to armed bandits operating in north-western Nigeria.
The interception, which took place on Tuesday, November 10, at Dawakawa in Goronyo Local Government Area of Sokoto State, followed a security operation targeting suspected weapons trafficking networks across the Nigeria-Niger border.
Security sources said the suspected smugglers were allegedly attempting to transport the weapons into Nigeria using camels, apparently exploiting remote routes and difficult terrain to evade security surveillance.
The operation led to the recovery of 21 AK-47 rifles, four PKT machine guns and 825 magazines.
The interception represents a significant disruption of an alleged cross-border weapons supply network suspected of facilitating the operations of armed bandit groups in the North-West.
The use of camels to transport the weapons highlights the increasingly unconventional methods employed by criminal networks to move arms and ammunition across porous border corridors.
The development also underscores the importance of sustained intelligence surveillance coordinated border security operations in preventing the movement of illicit weapons from neighbouring countries into Nigeria.
The recovered weapons are expected to provide security agencies with valuable leads towards identifying the suppliers, transporters and intended recipients of the consignment.
Zagazola report that several border communities along the Nigeria–Niger Republic frontier have emerged as vulnerable corridors for cross-border arms trafficking, bandit movements and other criminal activities, raising concerns over the security of Nigeria’s North-West.
The affected areas include Illela, Sabon Birni, Isa, Gudu and Tangaza in Sokoto State; Jibia, Kaita, Mai’Adua and Kongolam in Katsina; Zurmi and Shinkafi in Zamfara; as well as Kamba and Arewa Dandi in Kebbi State.
Security concerns around these border regions are linked to porous boundaries, informal trading networks and difficult-to-monitor rural terrain, which criminal networks like Bandits, Lakurawa and Boko Haram exploit for illicit activities.
The development reinforces the need for enhanced border surveillance, intelligence-sharing and coordinated operations to dismantle cross-border weapons supply networks.
Security agencies must also target the financiers and suppliers behind the trafficking networks rather than focusing solely on couriers.
DSS Intercept Weapons Shipment from Niger Republic, Recover 21 AK-47 Rifles, Four PKT Machine Guns in Sokoto
INEC Proposes Democratic Freedoms Compact to Safeguard 2027 Elections
…NHRC warns of political intimidation, arbitrary arrests, hate speech; EU pledges support for protection of civic space
By: Michael Mike
The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has proposed a Democratic Freedoms Compact to safeguard fundamental human rights, protect civic space and strengthen public confidence ahead of the 2027 general election.
The proposed compact is designed to guarantee freedom of expression, association and political participation, promote inclusiveness, ensure electoral transparency and accountability, and prevent violence, intimidation and other human rights violations throughout the electoral process.
INEC Chairman, Prof. Joash Amupitan, SAN, unveiled the proposal in a keynote address delivered on his behalf by Dr Hassan Umar at the 2026 Civil Society and Human Rights Defenders Forum on the State of Human Rights in Abuja on Wednesday.
The forum, organised by the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) in collaboration with the European Union (EU), was themed, “Protecting Human Rights in Civic and Political Spaces in the 2027 Elections.”
Amupitan said the credibility of the 2027 elections would be determined not only by the conduct of voting and collation of results but also by the extent to which Nigerians could freely express their opinions, associate, campaign and participate in the political process without fear, discrimination or violence.
He warned that regular elections alone could not sustain democracy if citizens were denied the freedom to express dissenting views, organise, criticise government policies and hold public institutions accountable.
To address these concerns, the INEC chairman said the proposed compact would establish a framework for institutional conduct built around six critical commitments: protection of fundamental freedoms, inclusive participation, transparent elections, accountability for human rights violations, peaceful political competition and constructive engagement among stakeholders.
He called for stronger collaboration among INEC, the NHRC, security agencies, civil society organisations and the media to monitor, document and respond to violations before, during and after the elections.
Amupitan reaffirmed the commission’s commitment to conducting credible elections, ensuring equal treatment of political parties and candidates, strengthening transparency and promoting inclusive participation.
On the contentious issue of electronic transmission of election results, he maintained that the Electoral Act 2026 provided for electronic transmission, while INEC had developed guidelines to address possible technical and communication challenges.
He urged political parties, civil society organisations and other stakeholders to familiarise themselves with the commission’s guidelines and regulations to avoid misinterpretation of the procedures governing result transmission.
The INEC chairman also placed responsibility on security agencies to protect voters, candidates, election officials, observers and journalists, insisting that security personnel must operate professionally and impartially.
He said their presence at polling units and other electoral locations should reassure citizens and create a safe environment for participation rather than generate fear or intimidation.
Earlier, Executive Secretary of the NHRC, Chief Anthony Ojukwu, warned that Nigeria’s democratic space was facing mounting challenges that required urgent intervention as the country approached the 2027 general election.
Ojukwu identified political intimidation, arbitrary arrests, harassment of journalists and human rights defenders, hate speech, restrictions on civic participation and the exclusion of vulnerable groups as threats capable of undermining the credibility of the electoral process.
He said the commission convened the forum at a defining moment in Nigeria’s democratic journey, with the presidential and National Assembly elections scheduled for January 16, 2027, and governorship and State Houses of Assembly elections to follow on February 6.
According to him, the timing was particularly significant because political campaigns were already gathering momentum across the country, making the protection of civic and political freedoms increasingly urgent.
He stressed that democracy was not sustained by elections alone but by the freedom citizens enjoyed between elections to speak without fear, assemble peacefully, associate without obstruction and choose their leaders without intimidation.
Citing Sections 14, 39 and 40 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, Ojukwu said sovereignty belonged to the Nigerian people, while constitutional guarantees protected freedom of expression, association and peaceful assembly.
He also referenced the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, which guarantees citizens the right to participate freely in the governance of their country.
The NHRC boss expressed concern that civil society organisations, journalists and human rights defenders continued to operate in an increasingly difficult environment characterised by harassment, arbitrary arrests and the potential misuse of laws, including provisions of the Cybercrimes Act.
He further raised concerns over political and voter intimidation, exclusionary nomination fees that could prevent women, young people and persons with disabilities from contesting elections, hate speech, incitement and the apparent absence of accountability for electoral offences.
Ojukwu warned that failure to prosecute electoral offenders could encourage impunity and embolden perpetrators to undermine the electoral process.
He disclosed that the commission had established a comprehensive human rights monitoring architecture to track political developments and election-related violations as campaigns intensified.
The mechanisms include a Human Rights Situation Dashboard, a human rights advisory and an Election Situation Room designed to monitor intimidation, suppression of political participation, harassment of journalists and other oversight actors, as well as violations of fundamental freedoms.
He said the commission was finalising an advisory on protecting political space and the right to participation in Nigeria, describing it as a flagship contribution to strengthening human rights protection during the forthcoming elections.
The advisory follows earlier interventions by the commission, including its February 2025 advisory on the protection of freedom of expression, which raised concerns about the interpretation and possible misuse of the Cybercrimes Act.
Ojukwu also disclosed that the commission was documenting violations, preparing cases for investigation and engaging INEC, security agencies, the National Peace Committee and other relevant institutions to strengthen accountability.
He said the NHRC’s Election Situation Room would remain operational throughout the electoral period, while election-focused dashboards and bulletins would be published regularly to provide information on human rights developments.
The commission, he added, would deploy monitors to identified hotspots and establish legal aid partnerships to respond to violations during and after the elections.
He announced that the forum would be transformed into a structured platform for sustained engagement between the commission and civil society organisations, with quarterly meetings, early-warning information sharing and rapid-response mechanisms.
According to him, the arrangement would facilitate coordination between the NHRC’s Situation Room and the Civil Society Election Situation Room, strengthen protection for individuals targeted for exercising their rights and ensure that stakeholders are held accountable for their commitments.
He said the forum would also adopt an outcome statement containing recommendations and a roadmap to guide its activities before, during and after the 2027 elections.
Ojukwu urged civil society organisations and human rights defenders to take ownership of the proposed framework, stressing that they were not spectators in the electoral process but essential partners in defending democracy.
He also acknowledged legislative efforts to strengthen the commission’s mandate and improve the legal protection of human rights defenders, expressing optimism that the reforms would create a more enabling environment for their work.
The NHRC executive secretary maintained that election-related violations must attract consequences, warning that the absence of accountability would weaken public confidence and encourage further abuses.
He said: “When elections go without violence, it is because of the work done long before polling day. Work that is sometimes invisible to the public.”
He added that the protection of democracy required collective responsibility and sustained commitment from government institutions, political parties, security agencies, civil society and international partners.
Also speaking, the EU Ambassador and Head of Delegation to Nigeria and ECOWAS, Gautier Mignot, reaffirmed the European Union’s commitment to supporting Nigeria’s democratic institutions and protecting civic and political freedoms ahead of the 2027 general election.
Mignot described the forum’s theme as timely, particularly against the backdrop of reports of election-related violence, hate speech, political intimidation and restrictions on citizens’ fundamental rights.
He warned that such incidents could erode public trust in state institutions and discourage citizens from participating in the electoral process.
The ambassador said free civic and political spaces, including independent media, peaceful assemblies, public forums and civil society organisations, were essential to ensuring credible, transparent and inclusive elections.
According to him, these spaces enable citizens to access information, debate public issues, scrutinise candidates and hold elected leaders and public institutions accountable without fear of censorship or retaliation.
He added that an open civic environment also allowed civil society organisations and active citizens to monitor election administration, track campaign promises and challenge government interference in the democratic process.
Mignot said weakening these safeguards could undermine citizens’ right to meaningful political participation and create opportunities for the suppression of opposition voices and manipulation of democratic rules.
He therefore urged all Nigerian stakeholders, including government institutions, political parties, civil society organisations and the media, to play their respective roles in ensuring a free, fair and credible electoral process.
The EU ambassador disclosed that the partnership with the NHRC had continued since 2024, when the first joint engagement provided a platform for human rights defenders to assess the state of human rights in Nigeria and develop collective responses to challenges confronting them.
He said the second engagement, held as part of activities marking the NHRC’s 30th anniversary, focused on reviewing the country’s human rights record over three decades and identifying emerging challenges requiring sustained intervention.
Mignot described the current forum as a continuation of the strategic partnership, adding that the EU was also preparing a new project with additional funding to deepen its collaboration with the commission.
He pledged that the EU delegation would carefully examine the recommendations and roadmap emerging from the forum and share them with its authorities and member states for further consideration.
He assured Nigeria that the EU and its member states would remain reliable partners in supporting democracy, good governance and the protection of human rights during what he described as a crucial period for the country’s democratic development.
In a goodwill message delivered on behalf of the Chairman of the Inter-Party Advisory Council (IPAC), Alhaji Yusuf Dantale, Prince Chinedu Obi urged political parties and their supporters to embrace issue-based campaigns, political tolerance and responsible communication.
IPAC cautioned against electoral violence, hate speech, voter suppression and political intimidation, stressing that political opponents must be regarded as competitors rather than enemies.
The council also advocated greater inclusion of women, young people and persons with disabilities in the electoral process, while urging security agencies and other relevant institutions to discharge their responsibilities with professionalism and impartiality.
Dantale said public confidence in the electoral system would ultimately depend on whether institutions could guarantee that votes counted and that Nigerians were able to exercise their democratic rights freely.
The forum brought together representatives of government institutions, diplomatic missions, political parties, civil society organisations, the media and human rights groups to assess the state of human rights in Nigeria and develop practical strategies for protecting civic and political freedoms ahead of the 2027 general election.
INEC Proposes Democratic Freedoms Compact to Safeguard 2027 Elections
EU, Nigeria Expand Cooperation on Migration, Security with €112m Support
DSS Intercept Weapons Shipment from Niger Republic, Recover 21 AK-47 Rifles, Four PKT Machine Guns in Sokoto
INEC Proposes Democratic Freedoms Compact to Safeguard 2027 Elections
Roger Federer’s Shock as DNA Results Reveal Myla and Charlene Are Not His Biological Children
THE PLIGHT OF FARIDA
FAILED COUP IN BURKINA FASO: HOW TRAORÉ NARROWLY ESCAPED ASSASSINATION PLOT AMID FOREIGN INTERFERENCE CLAIMS
-
News3 years agoRoger Federer’s Shock as DNA Results Reveal Myla and Charlene Are Not His Biological Children
-
Opinions5 years ago
THE PLIGHT OF FARIDA
-
News2 years agoFAILED COUP IN BURKINA FASO: HOW TRAORÉ NARROWLY ESCAPED ASSASSINATION PLOT AMID FOREIGN INTERFERENCE CLAIMS
-
Opinions5 years agoPOLICE CHARGE ROOMS, A MINTING PRESS
-
News3 years agoEYN: Rev. Billi, Distortion of History, and The Living Tamarind Tree
-
ACADEMICS3 years agoA History of Biu” (2015) and The Lingering Bura-Pabir Question (1)
-
Columns3 years agoArmy University Biu: There is certain interest, but certainly not from Borno.
-
Politics1 year ago2027: Why Hon. Midala Balami Must Go, as Youths in Hawul and Asikira/Uba Federal Constituency Reject ₦500,000 as Sallah Gift
