Connect with us

Feature

Amupiutated – In Touch, The Nation newspaper

Published

on

Amupiutated – In Touch, The Nation newspaper

By Sam Omatseye

The man in the nightmare of Atiku, Mark, Aregbesola and company must be one Nafiu Gombe. He was a sore thumb on creation day. That is, when the rains started to beat the coalition. He did not resign. No one has asked what the fellows in the Ralph Nwosu-led executive took from the army of occupation that Gombe did not get. They did not drop out for nothing. ADC was not formed for charity. It was no virgin asking for a rapist. The coalition of the wounded gave something. We want to know why and what.

We should also know why Gombe has not flinched. Did he get the offer and look the other way? Was he not ready to succumb for the cheap. What was the scale and character of the settlement?

Many media folks and reporters love the ADC folks too much to expose them? Maybe the few reporters and editors who want the truth ought to dig and soil their shovels. In Warri, in my boyhood years, we delighted in the phrase, “cheap article dey run belle.” It simply means, if you prefer to buy infested piece of food because it is cheap, a running stomach awaits you. ADC is in the belly of storm.

The ADC folks did not want to do the work of forming a political party. They settled for the aje butter formula. They want what is easy instead of what is true. They did not want to sweat, wait, get bruised, stumble and follow the narrow path. When they tried, they formed ADA. It sounded like a sister’s name. Then they learned it was a copycat. They did not know how to even name a party. So, they wanted a soup already cooked. Now they are having running stomach and they are blaming someone else who spent all day in the kitchen deploying heat and ingredients. What ADC has done is what Eleyinmi in Village Headmaster will call “nonsense and ingredients.”

Let us have some language lesson with the word ante bellum. It is latin, and we know lawyers have afflicted themselves with that ancient language. So, we can start with ante, and it means ‘before,’ ‘in front of’ or ‘prior to.’ Bellum means war or warfare. INEC chair Prof. Joash Amupitan has cleared the fog in his interview with Arise TV anchor Reuben Abati.

The folks in the ADC and their television lawyers are alien to this fact. When the Court of Appeal says the factions should revert to the status quo ante bellum, it means before the war in the ADC. So, when did the war in the ADC begin? Was it not when David Mark and his disciples browbeat the party executive to stand down? They did not resign a bloc. There is no constitutional recognition of group abdication. They did as individuals. Their trouble is with Gomb, who says it is his emilokan moment to be the party chairman.

ADC says he resigned. He said he did not. ADC is circulating what looks like a letter. It reads like a form. Did the ADC produce a stock letter for resignation whereby a person fills his name like a form? Everyone resigns for different reasons. But the letter in circulation looks like one written as though everyone must sign with the same reason and the same language. Even the handwriting in the same so-called letter is not consistent with a conflict of cursive and straight penmanship. Again, the letter was sent to INEC about four months after his purported resignation. Mariama Ba wrote a work titled: So Long a Letter. For ADC, so long a letter travels. We want to know if the ADC has the audacity to tender a forged letter in court; if, that is, Gombe’s denial is right. It will be defending a crime with a crime. It is also called double jeopardy. Fela would call it deady body get accident… Deady body break bone..Na double wahala for deady body and the owner of deady body.

The subplot of this drama is a battle of memory. Are they trying to play with the remembrance of things past, apologies to Marcel Proust. It is not like Proust which happened a long time ago. This is just months. Or is it like when Shakespeare says that they are making “a sinner of memory to credit a lie.”?

So, ante bellum means before that moment when the hostilities fomented, and it means before Mark was installed. Gombe never accepted Mark, and he believes he (Gombe)is the authentic chairman. That makes, in his lights, Mark a usurper.

Because the ADC folks are no respecters of the law, they have vowed to conduct their conventions and congresses, even though the court warned against any act on both sides. It means the folks are not serious. One Chidi Odinkalu said the professor – and Chidi is nowhere near a professor – who is INEC chair should not interpret the court verdict. A hollow man indeed he is. He wants Amupitan to go seek legal clarification in court. I know Chidi and his folks cannot write a manifesto yet, but who stops him and his ADC from going to court to seek same?

They cannot form a party. They cannot take over a party. They cannot settle everyone. They cannot interpret a court decision. They cannot write a manifesto as yet. They cannot obey court order. They are busy playing a club of political retirees without knowing it. They even have representatives abroad. Maybe they should ask for that task one of their stars, Rabiu Kwakwanso, who has been barred for terror reasons from the United States. He, too, should go to the Hague. Chidi should be his attorney for top dollar. ADC can pay.

They see themselves in ADC as a kaleidoscope of our politics. ADC glitters but no gold. Real gold takes a lot of digging. They should ask the president how he did his work. Some of the ADC men like Rauf know it.

Tinubu started his work years ago, and his political career in this republic began with the Alliance for Democracy. He did not found it but he ran from its grassroots to be governor. Just like his tour as president, he started with crisis. He did not cry. Rather he tackled the foes. One group was the elders of the Afenifere who wanted to lord it over him. They wanted to make him a marionette. They tried to impose Ganiyu Dawodu, who almost purloined his victory for Funsho Williams. He did not cry but worked within the party to get it back. They wanted to control Tinubu, his policies, his appointees. He defeated them. The trojan Babatunde Raji Fashola (SAN), who was Tinubu’s chief of staff tells for my upcoming book an incident when he banged the table in his office about not ceding an inch to them. The other battle was with Obasanjo, who planted spies and worms in the AD, wanted to weaken the party for the 2007 polls, a story told with Pathos by Olawale Oshun in his book The Kiss of Death. Tinubu did not cry like ADC about OBJ trying to kill his party. Neither did he compromise. He manoeuvred and blindsided and ambushed the general by forming the Action Congress. The stealth and imagination that led to the formation of AC reads like the story of witchcraft. But the details must not be unveiled here until my book tells it blow by blow. It was a political thriller. Even OBJ cannot tell it in public to save his ego. And some of those who took part in the scheme did not know who was pulling the strings and why. In an interview with one of them, he confessed, “But I was not aware.”

Yet, in the 2003 elections, when other states fell in the Southwest to the OBJ shenanigans, Lagos State was left unscathed. How did Tinubu ride the Tiger to his destination and the tiger was thankful and only growled away. Both beast and rider waved goodbye. He was going to beat the tiger later and reinforce the image of the last man standing.

Even if OBJ did sweep the Southwest states for his men, the same Tinubu did not weep. He went to work and the states, Edo, Oyo, Ogun, Osun, Ekiti, Ondo, all became progressives. In a famous Fashola line, they came back “one by one by God.”

After that, Tinubu pitched for the centre. No one can doubt that he was the architect and spirit behind the fall of PDP with Jonathan’s ouster. In one sweep, he redeemed Buhari and ended what was dreamed as a dynasty for 60 years.

Emilokan and Olule came as a war cry from Abeokuta. He beat his party leaders. Not strange to him. He did that in Lagos with Afenifere. He had said in Yoruba that they who wanted to scuttle his ambition with fuel and currency scarcity did not know the way home. The rest is history.

The ADC folks are crying because Amupitan obeyed the law. They were Amupiutated and they are crying. No legs to kick and hands to blow. The Supreme Court has not ruled, yet they are taking the laws into their hands. They plan to scare us by catastrophising the situation. They are imagining hell because they have no power to fight. They boasted over FCT polls that it would be bellwether of their popularity. How hard they fell.

As the cliché goes, you cannot make an omelette without breaking an egg. They want it served hot. It invokes Herman Melville’s classic novel Moby Dick where an ambitious amputee captain goes to sea to avenge of a white whale.

Amupiutated – In Touch, The Nation newspaper

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Feature

The Quiet Architect: Dambazau’s Legacy of Institutional Reform

Published

on

The Quiet Architect: Dambazau’s Legacy of Institutional Reform

By Mohammed Manga

Under the ancient baobab of Zazzau at dusk, where generations have weighed wisdom, the elders teach that “you do not judge a farm by the bustle of its clearing, but by the fullness of its barn at harvest.”

They also say, “A well is not praised because it was dug deep, but because it never runs dry when the people thirst.”
Such is the test of a nation. Not the elegance of its declarations or the flourish of its ceremonies, but whether its systems endure, its processes are fair, and the ordinary citizen can find dignity without knowing someone at the top. The true measure of a state is what works when no one is watching.

As Heraclitus observed, “No man ever steps in the same river twice, for it is not the same river and he is not the same man.” Institutions are those rivers. They must keep flowing even when personalities change, lest society run dry.

Nigeria, at 66, stands at a historic confluence. As the Yoruba say, “Bi omi ba ku, a fi oju ana e wo” — when water dries up, we study its former path. Our own path is instructive.

Long before amalgamation, governance in these territories had form and fidelity. In the Sokoto Caliphate, the Emir led, the Waziri administered, and the Alkali dispensed justice. In Oyo, the Alaafin ruled, but the Oyomesi checked his authority. Colonialism disrupted these indigenous systems, and independence tasked us with building modern institutions from near scratch.

Yet, as Professor Claude Ake warned, “the state in Africa has tended to become privatized.” To return it to the people, as the Igbo adage reminds us, “one finger cannot lift a load.” We need builders, not just occupants.

Global experience illuminates the path. Lee Kuan Yew transformed Singapore by insisting that “we have to re-invent ourselves continuously.” Malaysia transformed its commodity-based economy into an industrial powerhouse by disciplining its bureaucracy.

Botswana built one of Africa’s most trusted public services by insulating its institutions from patronage. Rwanda rebuilt its judiciary after conflict by enforcing case timelines. The United Arab Emirates transformed desert outposts into efficient service hubs by measuring service delivery and publishing results.

As Dag Hammarskjöld taught, “It is more noble to give yourself completely to one individual than to labour diligently for the salvation of the masses.” Institution-building demands that same level of dedication.

It is at the level of everyday encounters with the state, where dignity is either affirmed or denied, that public trust is won or lost. Citizens may applaud macroeconomic reforms, but they ultimately judge government by the courtesy they encounter at the counter and the reliability of services when no one is watching.

Viewed through this lens, the public service career of Lt.-Gen. Prof. Abdulrahman Bello Dambazau, a soldier, scholar, reformer and diplomat, offers a compelling case study.
His story began not in power, but in preparation. Born on March 14, 1954, in Zaria, he received his early education at Barewa College before proceeding to the Nigerian Defence Academy as a member of the 17 Regular Combatant Course. He was commissioned as a second lieutenant in June 1977.

He refused to let khaki limit his pursuit of knowledge. He earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Criminal Justice, a Master of Arts degree and a Master of Education degree from Kent State University in the United States, as well as a PhD in Criminology from the University of Keele in the United Kingdom. He thus became Nigeria’s first Chief of Army Staff to hold a PhD.

For 33 unbroken years, he served with distinction. His career included appointments as Aide-de-Camp to the Chief of Army Staff in 1979; commander of Military Police units; Special Investigator from 1984 to 1985; Registrar of the Nigerian Defence Academy from 1993 to 1999; Chief Instructor at the Infantry Centre and School; Directing Staff at the National War College; General Officer Commanding (GOC), 2 Division, Ibadan, from 2007 to 2008; and Chief of Army Staff from 2008 to 2010.

Along that path, he laid the foundation for the Counter-Terrorism and Counter-Insurgency Centre in Jaji and authored five seminal books, including Criminology and Criminal Justice. His academic distinctions included serving as a Senior Fellow at the University of Massachusetts, Boston, and an Associate at Harvard University’s Weatherhead Center for International Affairs. He also served as Chairman of the University Advancement Centre at the University of Ibadan.

He currently serves as Pro-Chancellor and Chairman of the Governing Council of Capital City University, Kano.
In November 2015, President Muhammadu Buhari called him to what was perhaps his most challenging assignment: Minister of Interior.

He inherited four agencies where morale was low and public cynicism was high: the Nigeria Immigration Service, the Nigeria Prisons Service (now the Nigerian Correctional Service), the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps, and the Federal Fire Service.

Many regarded it as a thankless ministry. He treated it as a laboratory for reform.
What does a scholar do with such a portfolio? He chose systems over slogans.
First, he professionalised the service. He introduced comprehensive reforms aimed at creating seamless pathways for career progression, training, appointments and promotions.

Second, he digitised operations. He introduced biometric systems, digitalised the international passport process, deployed Advance Passenger Information in collaboration with INTERPOL, and advocated local passport production to reduce costs and strengthen the security of the national database.

Third, he humanised the correctional system. He pursued reforms aimed at reducing congestion involving awaiting-trial inmates, procured operational vehicles, initiated plans for model custodial centres with a capacity of 3,000 inmates, and helped midwife the new Correctional Act, shifting the emphasis from punishment to rehabilitation in line with the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, commonly known as the Nelson Mandela Rules.

Fourth, he revived neglected institutions. At the time, the Federal Fire Service reportedly had fewer than three functional fire trucks in Abuja. He oversaw efforts to revitalise the service, increasing its fleet to more than 40 modern fire trucks and water tankers. The reforms also included the establishment of six zonal headquarters and the reactivation of its training school.

Fifth, he institutionalised coordination. He established a Situation Room for emergency coordination, led the US-Nigeria Security Sector Reform Dialogue, conceptualised the Institute of Domestic Security for the strategic training of senior officers, and instituted the Interior Games to promote collaboration among agencies under the ministry.

Beyond his work in uniform, Dambazau’s commitment to public safety and justice extended to victim advocacy. As a criminologist, he founded the Foundation for Victims of Child Abuse and the Nigerian Society of Victimology, affirming that the supreme art of governance lies in preventing harm, often without fanfare.

Today, that same depth of preparation and demonstrated capacity for institution-building has taken him to Beijing as Nigeria’s Ambassador to China, one of the country’s most strategic diplomatic postings.

What, then, is the enduring lesson?
If a scholar in uniform could transform four agencies often dismissed as moribund into institutions that now touch millions of lives with dignity — issuing passports with fewer frustrations, responding to fires with greater capacity, and securing borders through data — what prevents us from replicating that quiet architecture elsewhere?

If effective processes can replace patronage in the Ministry of Interior, they can do the same in primary healthcare centres, where medicines must be traceable; in public schools, where promotions must be merit-based; in power distribution, where metering must be transparent; and in local councils, where budgets must be published.

This article is not a eulogy. It is a mirror held up to all who serve and all who exercise oversight: political officeholders who formulate policies; legislators charged with oversight; heads of agencies who steer the machinery of the state; permanent secretaries and directors who safeguard institutional memory; and our revered members of the Bench, who serve as guarantors of justice.

The question remains: Are we leaving our institutions better than we found them?
Nigeria does not need louder government. It needs stronger institutions — systems that deliver when no one is applauding and endure long after the individuals who built them have left.

As Einstein said, “Strive not to be a success, but rather to be of value.” And as Professor Ali Mazrui reminded us, “Africa’s greatest challenge is not the absence of ideas, but the absence of institutions to carry those ideas.”

May the lesson of the quiet architect endure: build quietly, reform boldly, and leave the ladder down for others to climb.
Mohammed Manga is a public policy analyst who writes on governance and subnational reforms. He can be reached via mohammed.manga.policy@gmail.com.

The Quiet Architect: Dambazau’s Legacy of Institutional Reform

Continue Reading

Feature

BETWEEN DESPERATION, MISCHIEF AND PROFESSOR ZULUM’S PASSION FOR TINUBU/SHETTIMA

Published

on

BETWEEN DESPERATION, MISCHIEF AND PROFESSOR ZULUM’S PASSION FOR TINUBU/SHETTIMA

By: Inuwa Bwala

I have refrained from lending my voice to the controversies surrounding some developments in Borno in the last few weeks, believing time will heal the wounds.
I wanted to also establish the truth or mischief, there in, so that I do not draw the wrong conclussions.

I have spent a week in Maiduguri, visiting and investigating some of the issues, and everything points to a calculated political mischief. I spoke to those I believe could give me an objective view from what I read in the social media and all were of the view that, it was a calculated distraction targeted at the governor in particular, not even the state govetnmeny.

At the end of it, it became obvious to me, that, the achievements of the Borno state governor, Professor Babagsna Umara Zulum, seem to overwhelmed event is arch rivals and have closed the doors of any meaningful opposition in Borno.

It is also apparent, that, the sustained, attempt by some social media and political hirelings, acting out the scripts of their failed paymaster politicians is a narrative that has long been envisaged.

To link Professor Babagana Umara Zulum, to the recent arrest of some individuals in Maiduguri for allegedly wearing T-shirts with the inscription “TINUBU MUST GO”, in particular, seems to give an alibi to the seeming mischievous intents of the schemers.

I obtained the full record of Zulum’s interview, in which he vowed to go after miscresnts, masquarading as interest groups, as well as criminals and drug addicts, threatening the wellbeing of citizens, with the full weight of the law.

Tried, as I did to establish any material evidence, or police atribution to him, neither official correspondence, that links the Borno State Government or Governor Zulum to, the said arrest led to a blank wall.

By now, I am sure, that, every right thinking person who carefully looks at the issues, is more likely to come to the same conclussion, as I did, to the effect that, the allegations against governor Zulum, were neither here nor there.

The Nigeria Police Force is a federal institution, that does not take instructions from Zulum, even as the chief security officer, because, it has its coomand structure, and operational schedules. To ascribe their action on every security action in Maiduguri to Governor Zulum is not only illogical, but most uncharitable.
It is mischief clothed in political activism, which seems to have been taken too far.

Professor Zulum, as perhaps everyone knows, means well for the people of Borno, and Nugeria. He has often taken risks in his efforts at checking lawlessness, thuggery and vandalism. I know, he derides any form of lawlessness, and often takes charge, in trying to calm frayed nerves.

He is on record as the only governor in Nigeria who has consistently said that he will not harass the opposition because his performance will speak for him, niw and in the future.

In Borno, opposition parties have always held their meetings, granted press interviews, and criticized government freely without any molestation.
It will seem out of place for the same man who tolerates direct criticism of his own government, to be accused of ordering an arrest over a T-shirt against the President?
There is no doubt about the fact that, govetnor Zulum has been very passionate about the Tinubu/Shettima ticket, but certainly will not extend that passion to ordering for such an action.

It may be true, that,”uneasy always lies the head that wears the crown, but Zulum does not have to carry this cross, about which he knows nothing.

I have asked him personally to tell ne how much he kniws about the incident and he confirmed that he did not know about the srrest, untill his attention was called to nedia reports about it. I have no cause to doubt him, especially when he swore to that effect.

Those peddling this narrative are are either doing so because they have no cogent message to take to the people of Borno, or are so obbessed with anything decent and progressive, to the extent of crucifying the man for an iffence he knew nothing about.
I have often said it, that no one can fault

Zulum’s achievenents in Borno, either in the quality of infrastructural development, human capacity development, resettlement, rehabilitation or recontruction.
It is evidential that he exudes a rare courageous leadership in the face of insurgency. In the absence of credible alternative to his style of leadership, it has become so fashionable for some people to atribute to him every real or imagined wrong.

Laughable snd infantile, as it serms, is the circulation of a clearly AI-generated image, purporting that the Governor said the APC will rig the 2027 elections and heavens will not fall. This is the height of desperation and political forgery. Everyone who knows Professor Zulum knows he is a professor with integrity. He has never and will never associate himself with election rigging or any illrgitmate pursuit. I will not have to defend

He won his elections in 2019 and 2023 with overwhelming, verifiable margins because the people of Borno love him, not because he rigged.

What I am witnessing is an emerging industry of calumny attempt to rubbish Zulum because his towering achievements have rendered the opposition irrelevant in Borno. They want to put him at the crnter of a national controversy, where there is those eho may have heard about him, but not prrviledged to mert him, will lump him with emerging reckless speakers.

The people of Borno and indeed Nigerians are by now aware, that, falsehoods and mischief cannot diminish the stature Governor Zulum has attained.
Such distractions, as seems to be unfolding in Borno may be normal and I advice the governor to
remain focused on governance and on delivering the Tinubu/Shettima mandate through performance, not persecution. He believes in the ballot, not in intimidation.
History will vindicate him, as always.
I come in peace.

BETWEEN DESPERATION, MISCHIEF AND PROFESSOR ZULUM’S PASSION FOR TINUBU/SHETTIMA

Continue Reading

Feature

Twelve years on: A tribute to Braimoh, Hedima and other fallen heroes

Published

on

Twelve years on: A tribute to Braimoh, Hedima and other fallen heroes

By Edward Gabkwet

The month of September 2026 marks 12 years since two Nigerian Air Force (NAF) pilots took to the skies on a mission from which one would never return, while the other would disappear into the uncertainty of war.

Group Captain Abdulrasheed Bamidele Braimoh and Wing Commander Chimda Hedima were flying an Alpha Jet aircraft, NAF 466, on a combat mission against Boko Haram terrorists in the Northeast when their aircraft went down near Kauri in Konduga Local Government Area of Borno State on September 12, 2014.

Hedima was subsequently captured and killed by the terrorists, while Braimoh has since been declared killed in action, in line with the provisions of the Armed Forces of Nigeria.

Twelve years later, their story deserves more than a passing mention. It deserves to be remembered. More importantly, it should compel us to confront an uncomfortable question: How much do Nigerians truly appreciate the men and women who stand between the nation and those who seek to destroy it?

Many would agree that we have become too accustomed to casualty figures involving soldiers killed or maimed, aircraft lost or another funeral taking place. This is a sad reality that risks making tragedies appear ordinary.

But it must not be so.

Behind every military or para-military casualty is the story of a child who will grow up without a parent, parents who will bury their sons or daughters, spouses who suddenly become widows or widowers, and comrades who must return to the battlefield knowing that the colleague who stood beside them yesterday will not be there tomorrow.

Oftentimes, Nigerians criticise military operations, especially when there are setbacks. Such criticism is understandable, particularly in a democratic society like ours. However, in the intensity of these arguments, we sometimes forget the men and women at the centre of these operations.

The pilot who straps himself into a combat aircraft does not know with certainty whether the mission will end with a safe landing. In the same way, the soldier or sailor who moves into a forward position cannot be certain that he or she will return home to family.

Yet, they proceed.

They serve with honour and courage, accepting the enormous burden and consequences that come with their duty. The willingness to place one’s life in danger for the survival and security of others is one of the noblest obligations a citizen can undertake.

Braimoh and Hedima did precisely that on September 12, 2014.

Nigeria’s counterterrorism and counterinsurgency efforts have produced heroes whose names are well known, as well as many others whose sacrifices have barely entered the national consciousness.

Some died in heroic battles, while others paid the supreme price in ambushes, improvised explosive device attacks or assaults on isolated outposts, with their stories receiving little national attention.

Neglecting the legacies of such heroes who paid the supreme price strikes at the heart of a nation’s sense of responsibility. A nation that ignores its fallen heroes risks losing its sense of national obligation, and the consequences of such neglect can extend far beyond the immediate grief of their families.

Honouring our heroes must therefore go beyond ceremonies associated with the annual Armed Forces Remembrance Day or occasions when their coffins are draped in the national flag.

There should be a permanent and accessible national record of Nigeria’s fallen military personnel. Their names, photographs and stories should be preserved. Their families should be recognised, and their sacrifices should form part of our national history.

Perhaps most importantly, young Nigerians should be taught that citizenship is not only about what one receives from the nation, but also about what some citizens have sacrificed for its survival.

As we evoke the memories of Group Captain Abdulrasheed Bamidele Braimoh and Wing Commander Chimda Hedima, we should also remember the many other Nigerian military and para-military personnel who have made the ultimate sacrifice.

Twelve years after NAF 466 disappeared from the skies over the Northeast, the memories of Braimoh, Hedima and many others should remind us that the fight against terrorism has never been merely about recovering lost territory or counting casualties.

It has always been about those who leave home in uniform, venture into dangerous environments so that others can remain safe, and sometimes do not return.

Today, let us pause and remember the pilots, soldiers, airmen, sailors and para-military personnel who sacrificed their lives for our safety. Let us also remember their families, who continue to live with their absence.

And let us remember that behind every military casualty is a Nigerian life given in the service of our nation.

May we never become so accustomed to the sacrifices of our Armed Forces and other security agencies that we cease to be moved by them.

May we never forget Braimoh, Hedima and the many others who went before and after them.

And may Nigeria always remain worthy of the sacrifices made in her defence.

Gabkwet, an Air Vice Marshal, writes from Abuja.

Twelve years on: A tribute to Braimoh, Hedima and other fallen heroes

Continue Reading

Trending

Verified by MonsterInsights