Politics
Between the politics and comedy of Nigerian religious leaders
Between the politics and comedy of Nigerian religious leaders
Dr. James Bwala
The politics and religion of Nigeria are a theater of absurdity. Religious leaders in Nigeria frequently mix partisan politics with pulpit preaching. High-profile clerics from both major faiths use their religious platforms to endorse candidates, campaign for specific ballot tickets, and reduce national elections to religious headcounts, often ignoring good governance in favor of sectarian loyalty. I have read, watched, and heard about respected individuals, particularly across the Nigerian faithful—Christians and Muslims—taking to the pulpits or, on any given opportunity, across society, to demonstrate foolishness. I never want to join issues with whatever debate is ongoing within the Nigerian space, whether on traditional platforms, religious views, or the political landscape. However, while observing these trends, I chose to draw our attention to wherever we think we are going as Christians, Muslims, or traditional believers in Nigeria. I see the platform that established this theatrical battleground in our lives as citizens of a great nation. And here we must all come to understand that it benefits no one.
Politics, often deemed one of the most perilous concepts in human experience, demands a critical and profound reflection to truly grasp its implications. It is not just a word or an abstract idea; it speaks more about the intricate interplay of leadership and followership across diverse religious, traditional, and ethnic backgrounds—this essentially encompasses every facet of society. In fact, this universality makes politics in democratic governance extremely complex, expensive, and frequently bewildering even to those who are so involved in its practice. The chameleonic nature of politics, its propensity for self-serving manipulation, and its enduring influence on social structures call for a careful examination, particularly through the lens of Nigerian political realities since the nation’s return to democracy in 1999.
From the outset, politics is about power: who wields it matters, how it is acquired is key, and how it is exercised is very vital. The dynamics of politics go far and beyond the formal institutions and electoral processes; they permeate everyday interactions, decisions, and negotiations among individuals and communities. For example, in democratic societies such as ours, politics ostensibly serves as the mechanism through which diverse interests are reconciled and governance is carried out but not transparently and equitably. Yet the practical dimension often reveals a different story. However, through the lenses, we know that this is marked by intrigue, division, and exploitation. This duality renders politics simultaneously captivating and dangerous. The danger lies not only in overt conflict but also in subtler forms of manipulation and exclusion, which breed mistrust and instability.
The Nigerian context of politics vividly illustrates these tensions. Since the return of democracy or political rule in 1999, the political atmosphere in Nigeria has been characterized by visible ‘shapes and twists,’ referencing the multifaceted and sometimes contradictory practices that define political engagements across the country. From Lagos to Sokoto and Borno to Lagos again, the influence of politics has been unmistakable, shaping the social and economic life of Nigerians in profound ways. It is important to note that politics in Nigeria has often transcended its institutional boundaries to become a tool wielded by clerics, traditional rulers, and various opportunists who understand and manipulate it for personal gain. These actors exploit their positions of trust and authority within communities, utilizing politics as a means of consolidating influence or furthering agendas that may not align with democratic ideals or national unity.
In Nigeria, religion occupies a particularly significant role in the political arena, a situation made more complex by the country’s deep religious diversity. Political actors have frequently exploited this diversity, turning religion into a weapon for division rather than a foundation for coexistence. Figures such as Gumi, Jingir, and Dachemo symbolize how religious leaders can stir societal tensions, often under the protective umbrella of political maneuvering. Politics has afforded these figures the latitude to influence public opinion and exacerbate divisions without facing substantial restrictions or accountability. This phenomenon exemplifies the potent intersection between religion and politics, where the latter facilitates an environment conducive to “divide and rule” strategies.
The phrase “divide and rule” encapsulates a political tactic that has been evident throughout Nigerian history and remains alarmingly relevant today. It refers to the deliberate fostering of division among groups to maintain control and prevent unified opposition. In Nigeria, this strategy manifests in various forms, from ethnic and religious polarization to regional favoritism and patronage networks. An illustrative incident is the comment attributed to the governor of Katsina, Malam Dikko Umaru Radda, who reportedly sought to discriminate against civil servants based on faith. Such statements reveal the pernicious impact of political divisions, which not only undermine social cohesion but also threaten the equitable distribution of resources and opportunities. Ironically, Katsina State’s funding largely derives from federal allocations sourced from the oil revenues of states with populations of differing faiths, underscoring the interconnectedness of Nigeria’s socio-economic fabric and the folly of sectarian posturing.
The permissiveness of Nigeria’s political system towards divisive rhetoric and self-serving actions points to deeper systemic issues. Politics, as practiced, often shields arrogance and impunity, allowing destructive narratives to proliferate while compromising democratic accountability. Nonetheless, this same political arena has proven to be a double-edged sword. History testifies that politics, while seductive in its initial appeal, inevitably exposes vulnerabilities and precipitates the downfall of many who wield it arrogantly. The metaphor of politics as initially sweet but ultimately bitter rings especially true for political office holders who experience the transition back to civilian life at the end of their tenure. The reality they confront is sobering: the power and privileges of office evaporate, leaving behind a life that is “never normal at all.” This truth serves as both a caution and a moral imperative for political actors to govern with humility and foresight.
To move Nigeria toward a healthier political culture, there must be a collective effort to reframe the understanding and practice of politics. Leaders should prioritize genuine service over self-interest, embrace inclusivity, and foster respect for diversity rather than exploiting it for short-term gains. Reform is essential not only in institutional mechanisms but also in the societal attitudes that allow politics to be hijacked by sectarianism and opportunism. Civil society, media, and grassroots movements all have roles to play in holding political actors accountable and promoting a politics that unites rather than divides.
Moreover, democratic governance must transcend mere electoral processes and embody principles that ensure transparency, justice, and equitable development for all citizens. Only then can politics reclaim its nobler purpose: to serve as the art of governance for collective well-being rather than a battlefield for personal ambition or communal discord.
The study of politics, particularly within the Nigerian experience, reveals a landscape fraught with contradictions and challenges. Its dangers lie not only in overt conflicts but also in subtle manipulations that exploit identity and power asymmetries. However, acknowledging these dangers provides the foundation for meaningful reform and transformation. Nigerian politics need not remain a domain of confusion, expense, and exploitation. With committed leadership, informed citizenry, and robust institutions, politics can once again become a force for unity, development, and democratic consolidation. The journey may be arduous, but the stakes—peace, prosperity, and dignity—demand no less. It is time for Nigerian leaders and citizens alike to learn from past mistakes and embrace a politics that truly serves the common good.
- James Bwala, PhD, writes from Abuja.
Between the politics and comedy of Nigerian religious leaders
Politics
PDP faults appointment of permanent secretaries in Gombe
PDP faults appointment of permanent secretaries in Gombe
The Peoples’ Democratic Party (PDP), Gombe State Chapter, has faulted the recent appointment of permanent secretaries by Gov Inuwa Yahaya of Gombe State.
This is contained in a press statement issued in Gombe on Tuesday by Mr Abdulkadir Dukku, the party’s State Publicity Secretary.
Dukku said that the party acknowledged the constitutional authority of Yahaya to appoint permanent secretaries under Section 208 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
According to him, the exercise of that authority should, however be guided by due process, merit, and the applicable Public Service Rules and other extant administrative regulations.
He stated that the PDP expressed concerns by reports that some long serving and qualified career officers were overlooked, while others reportedly drawn from institutions of higher learning and non-scheduled
services were appointed as permanent secretaries.
“The party does not contend that persons from outside the established career structure are automatically disqualified.
“However, where such appointments are made, the Government should clearly explain the legal and administrative basis, eligibility requirements, and procedures through which the affected persons entered the State Public Service and became eligible for appointment to
the position of permanent secretaries.”
The PDP publicity secretary called on the Gombe State government to disclose the broad criteria and procedures used in selecting the 19 permanent secretaries.
He further urged the state government to review any appointment where credible evidence of nepotism, favouritism, conflict of interest, or procedural irregularity was discovered.
PDP faults appointment of permanent secretaries in Gombe
Politics
Yilwatda at 58: Embrace Culture of Giving, APC Chairman Urges Nigerian Leaders
Yilwatda at 58: Embrace Culture of Giving, APC Chairman Urges Nigerian Leaders
By: Michael Mike
National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Prof. Nentawe Yilwatda, has challenged Nigerian leaders to make service to humanity and the culture of giving central to their leadership, insisting that political positions should translate into tangible improvements in the lives of ordinary citizens.
Yilwatda made the call on Saturday in Jalingo, Taraba State, where he marked his 58th birthday by sponsoring a medical and surgical outreach that reached thousands of residents across the state’s three senatorial districts.
Rather than holding a conventional birthday celebration, the APC chairman chose healthcare intervention as the centrepiece of his anniversary, saying the decision reflected his belief that leadership must be measured by its impact on the people.

The birthday programme, held at the Multipurpose Conference Hall of the Federal Medical Centre (FMC), Jalingo, also featured the commissioning of landmark projects at the medical centre.
Yilwatda said the choice of Taraba was deliberate, explaining that the intervention was designed to respond to the needs of underserved communities, particularly residents who struggle to access quality healthcare because of distance, poverty and other socioeconomic barriers.
He said the exercise followed a needs assessment carried out before the commencement of the programme and was deliberately spread across the state to ensure that beneficiaries were drawn from different parts of Taraba.
The outreach began on August 3 at Takum General Hospital before moving to the Federal University Teaching Hospital, Wukari; First Referral Hospital, Sunkani, in Ardo-Kola Local Government Area; General Hospital, Bali; General Hospital, Gembu; and finally FMC Jalingo.
Thousands of residents received medical attention during the exercise, while hundreds of patients requiring surgical intervention were also attended to.
For Yilwatda, however, the intervention was more than a birthday gesture. It was a statement about the kind of leadership he believes Nigeria needs at a time when citizens are increasingly demanding that those entrusted with public responsibility deliver measurable benefits to society.

“Leadership is about service,” he said, urging political office holders and other public leaders to see giving back to society not as an occasional gesture but as an important component of their responsibility to the people.
He said Nigeria could only achieve sustainable development when its institutions were strong and when the welfare of citizens remained at the heart of governance.
Yilwatda also reaffirmed his personal commitment to service, declaring that his overriding ambition was to make his life useful to humanity.
“Every day that I live, the vision is: let it be useful to humanity,” he said.
The intervention attracted commendation from the Taraba State Government, with Governor Agbu Kefas describing the initiative as a timely demonstration of compassion and responsible leadership.
Kefas commended Yilwatda for choosing Taraba as the venue for his birthday celebration and, more importantly, for converting the occasion into an opportunity to provide healthcare to residents across the state.
He described the medical and surgical outreach as a significant intervention, particularly for residents who might otherwise have been unable to afford or access specialised medical services.
The governor also underscored the importance of partnerships between governments, institutions and individuals in addressing the needs of vulnerable citizens.
Minister of Health and Social Welfare, Prof. Muhammad Ali Pate, equally praised Yilwatda for making healthcare the focus of his 58th birthday celebration.
Pate said the decision to mark the occasion in the North-East, particularly Taraba, carried significance, noting that healthcare remained one of the most effective avenues for improving human welfare and strengthening national unity.
He described the health sector as a critical foundation for national development, stressing that no society could make meaningful progress without a healthy population.
The minister commended the Taraba State Government, the National Assembly and residents of the state for supporting and embracing the intervention.
The host of the celebration, Dr. Aisha Adamu Mohammed, said the choice of FMC Jalingo further demonstrated a commitment to strengthening medical excellence and improving healthcare delivery.
She described the projects commissioned at the medical centre and the outreach as important contributions to ongoing efforts to expand access to quality healthcare in Taraba.
The ceremony culminated in the cutting of Yilwatda’s 58th birthday cake and the commissioning of the projects at FMC Jalingo.
But beyond the ceremony and birthday symbolism, the anniversary carried a broader message: that leadership should not be defined merely by the office occupied, the privileges attached to it or the political influence it confers, but by the lives touched and the problems solved.
For Yilwatda, turning 58 was therefore not simply an occasion to celebrate another year of life. It was an opportunity to give, serve and demonstrate his conviction that public leadership ultimately finds its greatest meaning in humanity.
Yilwatda at 58: Embrace Culture of Giving, APC Chairman Urges Nigerian Leaders
Politics
2027: Nigeria Needs Issue-Based Political Discourse and Genuine Leadership
2027: Nigeria Needs Issue-Based Political Discourse and Genuine Leadership
By: Dr James Bwala
Going through the pages of newspapers, the drama that is taking over Nigeria’s approaches to the 2027 presidential elections is disconcerting. The pattern that dominates the political landscape speaks less of the personalities falling over themselves as the days unfolded. Politicians are fixated more on personal attacks and partisan squabbles than on substantive discussions about national challenges and solutions. This trend is not only counterproductive but also detrimental to Nigeria’s democratic progress and socio-economic development. For a country grappling with profound insecurity, widespread poverty, and pervasive corruption, the electorate deserves leaders who prioritise meaningful dialogue about policies and governance rather than engage in divisive rhetoric and political mudslinging.
The current state of political discourse reveals a troubling shift away from issue-based debates towards an obsession with personalities and irrelevant vendettas. A glaring example is the recent exchange between supporters of President Bola Tinubu and former Vice President Atiku Abubakar. When an Atiku supporter lambasted President Tinubu by questioning the public’s knowledge of his father, it exposed not only the pettiness of political arguments but also their irrelevance to the electorate’s pressing concerns. Ironically, the same critic forgets that Atiku himself has little public discourse about his own paternal background, underscoring how such personal attacks add no value to the presidential contest. More importantly, the lineage or parentage of these candidates bears absolutely no relevance to their ability to govern Nigeria effectively or address the nation’s myriad problems. Yet, this shallow focus distracts from urgent national issues that demand serious attention.
Similarly, Tinubu’s supporters have largely resorted to celebratory chants like “On your mandate we shall stand” instead of articulating and showcasing the tangible achievements or policy successes under the Tinubu-Shettima administration. Such displays may cultivate loyalty among core supporters but do little to persuade undecided voters or sceptics who seek evidence of competent governance. What Nigerians require are detailed outlines of policy frameworks and measurable progress reports on security, economic reforms, healthcare, education, and anti-corruption efforts—outcomes that directly impact daily lives. The absence of these critical conversations speaks volumes about the superficiality permeating political campaigns.
The disturbing episode involving Bishop Onayinkon and the Sultan of Sokoto further exemplifies the politics of distraction. While these revered figures occasionally become embroiled in political controversies, the essential “table” where politicians should lay down concrete plans remains conspicuously empty. Whether in the ruling party or the opposition, there is scant evidence of genuine engagement with the core issues undermining Nigeria’s stability and prosperity. Instead, time and resources are expended on symbolic gestures or media-driven theatrics rather than strategic policymaking and governance innovation.
As the opposition coalition attempts to regroup, with Atiku and Peter Obi supporters exploring alliances like the new G-100 coalition, numerous questions arise. For the new G-100 coalition, numerous questions loom large. Can these groups, historically divided by ideology and political ambition, genuinely reconcile and formulate a cohesive governance blueprint? Or will their efforts devolve into another round of factionalism and power struggles that fail to address Nigeria’s fundamental needs? The success or failure of such coalitions will significantly influence Nigeria’s political trajectory, underscoring the imperative for unity premised on substantive policy alignment rather than mere electoral arithmetic.
Giving this background, the broader socio-political context cannot be ignored. Nigeria’s challenges are deeply entrenched and multifaceted. Insecurity remains pervasive, with insurgency, banditry, kidnappings, and communal conflicts destabilising communities and eroding citizens’ confidence in government protection. Simultaneously, poverty continues to ravage millions, with economic inequality starkly visible in urban slums and rural hinterlands alike. Corruption, the perennial cancer afflicting governance structures, persists despite institutional anti-corruption agencies’ existence, largely due to weak enforcement, political interference, and lack of transparency.
Regrettably, government bodies tasked with combating these challenges have yet to deliver tangible results that speak at the grassroots level. Public trust in institutions is waning, and this vacuum often fuels apathy or cynicism during elections. Adding to the complexity, grassroots conversations across Nigerian towns and villages reveal a palpable anxiety about the future. Voters whisper tentative plans, alliances, and expectations ahead of 2027, signifying both hope and uncertainty. These silent discourses often escape mainstream political narratives but are crucial indicators of public sentiment and priorities.
From all indications, a critical juncture lies ahead. The political actors have a clear choice: continue with self-serving battles and distractions that risk further destabilising Nigeria’s fragile democracy, or rise above partisan bickering to offer authentic leadership grounded in ideas, solutions, and national interest. Nigerians deserve a “full table” of ideas—a comprehensive agenda addressing insecurity, poverty alleviation, systemic corruption, economic diversification, infrastructure development, education reform, and social cohesion. Without this, the elections risk becoming a mere spectacle of personalities rather than a genuine exercise in democratic renewal.
The fact remains that the 2027 Nigerian presidential elections must transcend the current culture of personal attacks and symbolic posturing. For Nigeria to progress, politicians must shift focus from criticising each other’s lineage or engaging in hollow celebrations to presenting substantive plans that respond to the nation’s critical challenges. The electorate deserves leaders who speak boldly about what they can contribute to Nigeria’s development and who demonstrate commitment to transparent governance and inclusive growth. Only through such a transformation in political discourse can Nigeria hope to build a more secure, prosperous, and united future. The days ahead will reveal whether Nigerian politicians choose to build bridges or deepen divisions—but the stakes could not be higher for the country and its people.
- James Bwala, PhD, writes from Abuja.
- 2027: Nigeria Needs Issue-Based Political Discourse and Genuine Leadership
-
News2 years agoRoger Federer’s Shock as DNA Results Reveal Myla and Charlene Are Not His Biological Children
-
Opinions4 years agoTHE PLIGHT OF FARIDA
-
News1 year agoFAILED COUP IN BURKINA FASO: HOW TRAORÉ NARROWLY ESCAPED ASSASSINATION PLOT AMID FOREIGN INTERFERENCE CLAIMS
-
News2 years agoEYN: Rev. Billi, Distortion of History, and The Living Tamarind Tree
-
Opinions5 years agoPOLICE CHARGE ROOMS, A MINTING PRESS
-
ACADEMICS2 years agoA History of Biu” (2015) and The Lingering Bura-Pabir Question (1)
-
Columns2 years agoArmy University Biu: There is certain interest, but certainly not from Borno.
-
Politics1 year ago2027: Why Hon. Midala Balami Must Go, as Youths in Hawul and Asikira/Uba Federal Constituency Reject ₦500,000 as Sallah Gift
