News
CIVIL SOCIETY, LEGAL EXPERTS BACK KING DAKOLO’S SUIT AGAINST SHELL’S UNJUST NIGER DELTA SELLOFF
CIVIL SOCIETY, LEGAL EXPERTS BACK KING DAKOLO’S SUIT AGAINST SHELL’S UNJUST NIGER DELTA SELLOFF
By: Michael Mike
A coalition of civil society organisations – Social Action Nigeria, the Health of Mother Earth Foundation (HOMEF), the International Working Group on Petroleum Pollution and the Just Transition in the Niger Delta (IWG), the Bayelsa State Non-Governmental Organisations Forum (BANGOF), HEDA Resource Centre, Kebetkache Women Development and Resource Centre, and others – stands in firm solidarity with His Royal Majesty, King Bubaraye Dakolo, Agada IV of Ekpetiama Kingdom and Chair of the Bayelsa State Council of Traditional Rulers, as the Federal High Court, Yenagoa, convenes today for the first hearing of the suit filed against Shell, the Minister of Petroleum Resources, the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC), and the Attorney General of the Federation.
The suit challenges Shell’s attempt to divest its onshore oil assets and exit the Niger Delta without first decommissioning obsolete infrastructure, remediating environmental damage, and compensating the Ekpetiama people for long-standing harm. It raises fundamental issues about the constitutional and environmental rights of the Niger Delta’s indigenous communities, Shell’s corporate liability, and the Nigerian government’s responsibility to protect its citizens.
A struggle for justice and dignity in the Niger Delta.
In the statement of claim, King Dakolo outlines how Shell’s operations in the Gbarain oil fields – located within the Ekpetiama Kingdom in Yenagoa Local Government Area of Bayelsa State -have led to massive oil spills, gas flaring, and the destruction of fishing and farming livelihoods. The community’s rivers, forests, and farmlands have been rendered toxic and unsustainable for life and livelihoods.
The plaintiffs argue that Shell’s planned divestment of its interest in the Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) without fulfilling its environmental obligations in accordance with the Nigerian Constitution and laws is illegal and unjust, and that the Nigerian state, through the Minister of Petroleum Resources, NUPRC, and the Attorney General, has failed in its duty to prevent such corporate evasion of responsibility.
King Dakolo and the Ekpetiama people seek to stop Shell’s planned divestment until Shell accounts for its environmental devastation, remediates polluted sites, decommissions obsolete infrastructure, and compensates the host communities affected by over six decades of irresponsible oil extraction.
This suit represents a stand for the rights of host communities and the rule of law in Nigeria. The plaintiffs are asking the court to:
- Declare that Shell’s proposed divestment without environmental remediation and decommissioning is unlawful;
- Compel the NUPRC and federal authorities to fulfill their constitutional and statutory responsibilities;
- Uphold the constitutional rights of affected communities under the Nigerian Constitution (right to life and dignity);
- Prevent the transfer of assets and liabilities to successor companies without legal and environmental accountability.
According to Barrister Chuks Uguru, lead counsel for the plaintiffs, “this action against SPDC, Shell Corporation, Renaissance Group, and federal agents is over the unlawful divestment of oil assets in Ekpetiama Kingdom whose members have the fundamental right to a clean and healthy environment under the Nigerian Constitution and the African Charter.”
Backed by facts: the Bayelsa Commission report
This case is grounded in the extensive findings of the Bayelsa State Oil and Environmental Commission (BSOEC), composed of experts from Europe, North America, and Africa. The Commission revealed that:
- Bayelsa State suffers from some of the worst oil pollution levels in the world, resulting from the operations of Shell and other international oil companies;
- Over 1.5 million people in Bayelsa are impacted by hydrocarbon pollution;
- Communities have been exposed to Chromium, benzene and other cancer-causing chemicals far exceeding World Health Organisation safety limits;
- Oil spills have contaminated nearly all primary water sources, forcing residents to rely on visibly polluted creeks and ponds;
- Soil samples revealed extremely high levels of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH), rendering lands unfit for agriculture;
- Air quality measurements near Shell facilities recorded particulate matter and soot far above permissible health thresholds;
- In some communities, fish stocks have declined by over 70%, impacting food security and livelihoods;
- Shell and other oil companies have failed to carry out proper decommissioning and cleanup, leaving rusting, leaking pipelines and abandoned wellheads that continue to pollute.
Shell, the largest operator, was named as a primary culprit.
“This divestment is a crude attempt by Shell to run away from the disaster it created,” said His Royal Majesty, King Bubaraye Dakolo. “We demand justice, not abandonment. Shell must clean up, compensate, and decommission. Only then can it leave.”
This is a test case for corporate accountability
The case has drawn broad support from national and international civil society groups concerned about environmental justice and a just energy transition.
“Shell wants to exit with profit, leaving behind toxic air, poisoned water, and broken communities,” said Dr. Isaac Asume Osuoka, Director of Social Action Nigeria. “We are here to say: no more. Planned onshore asset selloffs by transnational oil corporations must not become a license to flee environmental accountability in the Niger Delta extraction sites, which is home to human beings.”
“The Niger Delta cannot be a sacrificial zone for fossil fuel greed,” added Reverend Nnimmo Bassey, Executive Director of the Health of Mother Earth Foundation (HOMEF). “We stand in solidarity with King Dakolo and the people of Ekpetiama Kingdom in demanding that Shell pay for the damage it has done before it walks away.”
“The evidence is clear. Seventy years of fossil fuel production in Nigeria’s Niger Delta has destroyed ecosystems, economies, environments and human habitats. If just transition is to be more than just a slogan, clean up, restoration, and repair must be mandatory for oil companies divesting, before they up sticks and leave,” said Dr. Kathryn Nwajiaku‑Dahou, Director of the Politics and Governance Programme at ODI Global and co-Convener of the IWG.
International dimensions: precedent for transition justice
Developments in the Niger Delta, which contains the most polluted oil and gas production sites in the world world, have relevance for the global transition away from fossil fuels. That is why this case poses urgent questions about what a just transition means for communities here and others in the tropical regions of the Global South, which are at the frontlines of fossil extraction.
“This case sets a precedent in Nigeria, the Gulf of Guinea region, and globally,” said Professor Engobo Emeseh, Head of the School of Law at the University of Bradford, United Kingdom, speaking for the Legal and Justice Committee of the IWG. “It says clearly: there can be no just energy transition without corporate accountability, environmental restoration, and community consent.”
Call to the judiciary: uphold the law, defend the people
We call on the Federal High Court to act decisively to:
- Restrain Shell and its partners from finalising any asset sale or divestment until full compliance with environmental and human rights obligations is demonstrated;
- Compel regulators like the NUPRC to enforce the Petroleum Industry Act and protect host communities;
- Affirm the rights of indigenous peoples of the Niger Delta to clean environments, safe livelihoods, and full consultation.
“This is a crucial moment in Nigeria’s environmental and legal history,” according to Olanrewaju Suraju, Director of HEDA Resource Centre. “The court has a unique opportunity to uphold justice, protect the rule of law, and demonstrate that no corporation is above accountability in Nigeria.” - CIVIL SOCIETY, LEGAL EXPERTS BACK KING DAKOLO’S SUIT AGAINST SHELL’S UNJUST NIGER DELTA SELLOFF
News
NDLEA intercepts cocaine shipment from Brazil, detains ship, 20 Filipino crew members
NDLEA intercepts cocaine shipment from Brazil, detains ship, 20 Filipino crew members
By: Michael Mike
Barely six months after 10 Thai sailors and their ship were convicted and fined $4.3 million for bringing 32.9 kilogrammes cocaine into Nigeria, operatives of the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) have again intercepted another commodity laden vessel- MV Nord Bosporus marked 9760110 from the port of Santos in Brazil at the Apapa seaport in Lagos with no less than 20 kilogrammes of the Class A drug buried under its cargo.
A statement on Friday by the spokesman of the anti-narcotics agency, Femi Babafemi said the illicit drug consignment was discovered on board the vessel last Sunday by NDLEA officers who thereafter took the Master of the ship, Captain Quino Eugene Corpus and 19 other crew members who are all Filipinos into custody for investigation.
Babafemi said following the seizure and arrest of the crew members, the NDLEA filed an application for an order of court for the detention of the vessel and the 20 Filipinos on board for further investigation.

He disclosed that the motion ex-parte in suit number FHC/L/MISC/1306/25 was argued before Justice Musa Kakaki of the Federal High Court, Lagos, who on Thursday granted the application for an initial 14 days detention of the vessel, Capt. Corpus and 19 other Filipino crew members.
Babafemi said preliminary investigation revealed that this was the first time the vessel was coming to Nigeria and Africa as it’s been largely transporting coal between Colombia and Brazil while Captain Corpus has been barely three months with the ship.
He recalled that the agency had in a similar circumstance arrested 10 sailors who are nationals of Thailand on 13th October 2021 on board a vessel named MV Chayanee Naree for trafficking 32.9 kilogrammes of cocaine from Brazil into Nigeria through the Apapa seaport. Nine Nigerian suspects were also arrested along with the Thai crew members.
He said the 10 Thai sailors and the vessel were eventually convicted on Thursday 15th May 2025 by a Federal High Court in Lagos presided over by Justice Daniel Osiagor who also fined them $4.3 million.
In his reaction to the latest significant seizure of 20 kilogrammes cocaine on board MV Nord Bosporus, Chairman/Chief Executive Officer of NDLEA, Brig. Gen. Buba Marwa (rtd) commended the officers, men and women of the Apapa Strategic Command of the agency as well as the Directorate of Seaport Operations for their vigilance, diligence and professionalism.
Marwa said the cocaine seizure is not just an operational success but “a clear demonstration of our heightened capacity and unwavering resolve”, adding that “we will continue to tighten our grip on all entry and exit points, especially our seaports, which transnational criminal organisations have historically attempted to exploit.”
According to him, “Let this be an unambiguous message to every international drug cartel and every internal collaborator: Nigeria is not, and will never be, your space or your foothold. The NDLEA is operating with zero-tolerance, and we will not permit any illicit drug to pass through our borders, whether by air, land, or sea. You may scheme, you may attempt sophisticated concealment, but you will fail. Our intelligence network, collaboration with international partners, and the dedication of our officers are steps ahead of your nefarious activities.”
He reminded any Nigerian who chooses to collaborate with foreign syndicates in the illicit drug trade of the consequences their action.
He said: “You are not just committing a crime; you are betraying your nation’s future. The consequences of aiding and abetting drug trafficking will be severe and unrelenting. We are committed to using the full force of the law to dismantle your structures, seize your illicit assets, and secure your long-term incarceration.”
NDLEA intercepts cocaine shipment from Brazil, detains ship, 20 Filipino crew members
News
NHRC Announces Programmes for 16 Days of Activism on GBV
NHRC Announces Programmes for 16 Days of Activism on GBV
By: Michael Mike
The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) has announced its plans for the 2025 International 16 Days of Activism Against Gender-Based Violence.
The activities which commences on Monday, showed a sweeping nationwide plan and a renewed call for stronger protections for women and girls, as the Commission also marks its 30th anniversary.
Addressing journalists at a press briefing in Abuja, the Executive Secretary of NHRC, Dr. Tony Ojukwu said the anniversary provided an important moment to reflect on three decades of work advancing justice, dignity, and equality in Nigeria — while acknowledging that gender-based violence (GBV) remains one of the gravest human rights violations confronting the country.
He said: “For 30 years, the Commission has remained a steadfast voice for accountability and human rights. This year’s campaign gives us the opportunity not only to reflect on our journey but to intensify the fight against all forms of violence, especially against women and girls.”
The 16 Days of Activism — observed annually from November 25 to December 10 — is part of a global movement launched in 1991 by the Centre for Women’s Global Leadership. It links the International Day for the Elimination of Violence Against Women with Human Rights Day, symbolizing that violence against women is a direct violation of human rights.
Ojukwu noted that Nigeria remains committed to this global call.
He said: “Gender-based violence is unacceptable in every form. These 16 days remind us that survivors must be heard, supported, and protected.”
This year’s programme, one of the NHRC’s most extensive yet, includes coordinated activities across all 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory.
According to Ojukwu, the activities are designed to strengthen prevention, improve accountability, and reinforce protection structures nationwide.
Marking its 30-year milestone, the NHRC urged the National Assembly to pass legislation creating special constituencies for women — a long-standing proposal aimed at improving female representation in public office.
“Denying affirmative action is itself a form of violence against women,” the Commission emphasized. “Empowerment must include political participation.”
The Commission also highlighted multiple empowerment programmes conducted in partnership with local and international organisations. These include:Support for over 60 survivors of sexual and gender-based violence under the EU/UNDP Spotlight Initiative; Financial grants for vulnerable women in collaboration with the Taipei Trade Office; Economic empowerment for more than 100 indigent women through the Thelma Lion Foundation; Distribution of sewing machines, grinding machines, and hair dryers to over 300 women through partnerships with National Assembly members; Ongoing collaboration with the Dorothy Njemanze Foundation to support SGBV survivors.
Ojukwu said: “These interventions are meant to strengthen the socio-economic resilience of women and reduce vulnerabilities.”
He reassured Nigerians that the commission will continue to carry out its mandate with fairness and impartiality.
He said: “We will not allow gender-based violence or any human rights violation to go unaddressed. Every complaint matters, and every perpetrator must be held accountable.”
As the 16-day campaign begins, Ojukwu called on government institutions, traditional and religious leaders, civil society groups, the private sector, and individuals to join in the fight to end violence against women.
“Awareness is not enough,”Ojukwu said. “We must turn commitments into action and build a Nigeria where women and girls can live free from fear, discrimination, and harmful practices.”
NHRC Announces Programmes for 16 Days of Activism on GBV
News
IPCR: Livestock Sector Now Sits at the Heart of Nigeria’s Ecosystem
IPCR: Livestock Sector Now Sits at the Heart of Nigeria’s Ecosystem
By: Michael Mike
The Institute for Peace and Conflict Resolution (IPCR) has said the livestock sector now sits “at the heart of Nigeria’s conflict ecosystem,” influencing local economies, intergroup relations, and national security.
While Nigeria has produced multiple livestock policies over the years, speakers at the Policy Review Meeting of the Network of Policy Makers for the Support of Peace, Security and Reconciliation in Nigeria organized by IPCR in partnership with King Abdullah Bin Abdullaziz International Centre for Interreligious and Intercultural Dialogue (KAICIID), agreed that the country’s biggest challenge is not policy creation but policy implementation.
The Executive Secretary of IPCR, Dr. Joseph Ochogwu said: “Policies exist, but they often die before they leave the shelf,” echoing past criticisms that Nigeria has become a “graveyard of unimplemented policies.”
He warned that the farmer–herder conflict has evolved into a complex risk system shaped by climate pressures, land scarcity, population growth, trans-border migration, and weak governance structures. Without coordinated action, these pressures threaten to overwhelm already stretched local and national institutions.
He stressed that the success of livestock reforms will depend on effective coordination between federal ministries, state governments, local authorities, and community actors.
He said: “When institutions operate in silos, conflict fills the gap. But when federal, state, and local structures move in alignment, policy becomes a stabilizing tool.”
He described traditional rulers, pastoralist associations, farmers’ groups, and religious leaders as “indispensable partners” in the process rather than observers brought in after decisions are made.
The session also addressed growing concerns around communal violence and allegations of targeted attacks against specific religious groups. Recent claims suggesting that Christians are being systematically exterminated in Nigeria have gained international attention.
Ochogwu acknowledged the emotional weight of such claims but cautioned against narratives not grounded in verified evidence.
“Nigeria’s security challenges stem from terrorism, banditry, resource competition, and historical grievances,” he said, while adding that: “These problems affect all groups, and they require collective solutions—not divisive interpretations.”
He emphasized that Nigeria must not allow any trajectory that resembles genocide or the destruction of any community, calling for stronger early-warning systems, improved regulation of pastoral mobility, and policies that prevent local tensions from escalating into large-scale atrocities.
Participants agreed that the partnership between policymakers and faith leaders is central to preventing violence. Religious institutions, they noted, have moral authority and grassroots influence that government structures often lack, particularly in rural communities most affected by the conflict.
“This network exists because peace is not a government-only project,” the convener said. “It must be built through a multi-layered alliance of policymakers, traditional institutions, and religious leaders.”
Ochogwu highlighted four areas requiring urgent action: Strengthening vertical and horizontal coordination across federal, state, and community levels; Embedding conflict-sensitive practices into all livestock policy implementation; Ensuring inclusive engagement involving farmers, pastoralists, women, youth, and local institutions and Institutionalizing evidence-based monitoring systems that track conflict hotspots and pastoral mobility using real-time data.
IPCR reaffirmed its commitment to supporting the Federal Government through conflict analysis, policy advisory services, mediation, and early-warning mechanisms. Its partnerships with KAICIID and other international bodies, it said, are aimed at ensuring that the outcomes of these dialogues translate into tangible impact at the community level.
Participants agreed that Nigeria stands at a critical moment. Transforming livestock policy into practical action, they said, is not only a matter of agricultural reform—it is a prerequisite for national stability.
Ochogwu said: “Moving from intention to impact is the only path to sustainable peace,” note”ing that: “Strengthening coordination in the livestock sector is ultimately strengthening Nigeria itself.”
Policymakers, diplomats, and leading clerics convened in Abuja on Friday for the Second Quarter Policy Review Dialogue of the Network of Policymakers and Religious Leaders, with a renewed push to transform Nigeria’s long-standing livestock policy from paper commitments into real, coordinated action.
The meeting, held at the Institute for Peace and Conflict Resolution (IPCR) headquarters, focused on the theme “From Policy to Practice: Strengthening Coordination and Implementation of Nigeria’s Livestock Policy.” It brought together government officials, faith leaders, security experts and community representatives who described the dialogue as a crucial step in tackling the persistent farmer–herder crisis and its broader security implications.
IPCR: Livestock Sector Now Sits at the Heart of Nigeria’s Ecosystem
-
News2 years agoRoger Federer’s Shock as DNA Results Reveal Myla and Charlene Are Not His Biological Children
-
Opinions4 years agoTHE PLIGHT OF FARIDA
-
Opinions4 years agoPOLICE CHARGE ROOMS, A MINTING PRESS
-
News2 years agoEYN: Rev. Billi, Distortion of History, and The Living Tamarind Tree
-
News7 months agoFAILED COUP IN BURKINA FASO: HOW TRAORÉ NARROWLY ESCAPED ASSASSINATION PLOT AMID FOREIGN INTERFERENCE CLAIMS
-
ACADEMICS2 years agoA History of Biu” (2015) and The Lingering Bura-Pabir Question (1)
-
Columns2 years agoArmy University Biu: There is certain interest, but certainly not from Borno.
-
Opinions2 years agoTinubu,Shettima: The epidemic of economic, insecurity in Nigeria
