Connect with us

News

ECOWAS AT A CROSSROADS AS TOURAY ENDS FOUR-YEAR ERA

Published

on

ECOWAS AT A CROSSROADS AS TOURAY ENDS FOUR-YEAR ERA

By Michael Olukayode

The departure of Dr Omar Alieu Touray as President of the ECOWAS Commission closes a four-year chapter in the history of West Africa’s foremost regional organisation, but it also opens one of its most uncertain.

Touray, a Gambian diplomat who took charge of the Commission in 2022, leaves office after presiding over a period in which the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) was tested by military coups, worsening insecurity, economic pressures and, most significantly, the withdrawal of Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger from the regional bloc.

The formal handover of the Commission’s statutory leadership is scheduled for Monday, August 31, in Abuja, bringing the Touray era to a close and ushering in a new leadership at a defining moment for the 51-year-old organisation.

His exit is therefore more than a routine change of guard. It provides an opportunity to assess not only the record of his administration but also the direction of an organisation that has been fundamentally altered during his tenure.

Created in Lagos on May 28, 1975, ECOWAS was conceived principally as an instrument for economic integration. Over five decades, however, it developed into much more than a trading bloc, assuming responsibilities in peacekeeping, conflict resolution, democratic governance, humanitarian intervention, health, infrastructure and regional security.

Touray inherited this expansive institution in 2022 at a time when many of its traditional assumptions were already under strain.

His four years in office would subsequently be dominated by a succession of political and security crises that tested the limits of ECOWAS’s authority and its ability to hold its members together.

A presidency defined by turbulence

The most consequential development of the Touray years was the rupture with the Sahelian states.

Following military takeovers, Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger increasingly came into confrontation with ECOWAS over the restoration of constitutional government, sanctions and the bloc’s approach to regional security.

The crisis eventually resulted in the three countries withdrawing from ECOWAS and strengthening their alternative regional arrangement under the Alliance of Sahel States.

For an organisation whose central philosophy has been regional integration, the departure of three member states represented perhaps the most serious institutional setback in its history.

It also exposed the limits of ECOWAS’s traditional approach to political crises.

The organisation had established itself as one of Africa’s strongest regional defenders of constitutional government, using diplomatic pressure and sanctions to discourage military takeovers.

But the recent coups demonstrated that the authority of regional institutions could not be taken for granted.

The sanctions imposed on military regimes generated criticism in some quarters, with concerns that the economic consequences were being felt by ordinary citizens. At the same time, ECOWAS faced the difficult argument that failing to respond to unconstitutional changes of government could encourage further military interventions.

Touray’s administration was consequently forced to navigate a difficult balance between defending regional democratic principles and preserving the cohesion of the community.

What ECOWAS built before Touray

Yet the difficulties of the past four years should not obscure the broader record of ECOWAS.

Since 1975, the organisation has achieved considerable progress in bringing West African countries closer together.

The free movement regime remains one of its most visible achievements. Millions of citizens across the region have benefited from arrangements that facilitate travel, residence and economic activity across national borders.

The ECOWAS Trade Liberalisation Scheme and the Common External Tariff have similarly provided a framework for expanding intra-regional commerce and moving the region towards a common market.

The organisation has also played a historic role in peace and security.

Through ECOMOG, ECOWAS intervened in devastating conflicts in Liberia and Sierra Leone, demonstrating that the regional bloc could mobilise collectively when national crises threatened wider regional stability.

Its responsibilities later expanded to mediation, conflict prevention, peacebuilding and the defence of constitutional order.

In infrastructure and energy, ECOWAS has promoted regional projects aimed at connecting economies that were separated by colonial-era boundaries. The West African Power Pool, for instance, represents an attempt to make electricity a regional rather than purely national resource.

The organisation has also developed regional cooperation in agriculture, health and humanitarian affairs.

Under Touray, these areas remained part of the Commission’s agenda.

The implementation of the ECOWAS Vision 2050 continued, with emphasis on regional integration, trade, mobility, youth employment, agriculture, healthcare and development.

The West African Health Organisation also continued regional cooperation in disease surveillance and emergency preparedness. The distribution of 30 medical ambulances to member states was among the practical interventions highlighted during the period.

These initiatives underline an important point: the Touray presidency cannot be measured only by the political crises that dominated headlines.

The unfinished business

But ECOWAS’s long history also contains a catalogue of unfinished ambitions.

The proposed single currency, the Eco, remains unrealised despite decades of planning.

Intra-regional trade remains below its potential, while traders and travellers continue to face cumbersome border procedures, non-tariff barriers, delays and other obstacles.

Regional agreements are frequently undermined by weak implementation at the national level, reflecting the continuing tension between national sovereignty and regional integration.

Security is perhaps the most pressing unresolved challenge.

Despite years of cooperation, terrorism and violent extremism have continued to devastate parts of the Sahel and threaten to spread towards coastal West Africa.

The emergence of the Alliance of Sahel States has added another layer to the security equation, with countries that once operated within ECOWAS now pursuing a separate political and security path.

What Touray leaves behind

It is against this background that Touray’s departure acquires significance.

He leaves behind an ECOWAS that is still one of Africa’s most important regional institutions, but one that is no longer the same organisation he inherited in 2022.

The region has become more politically fragmented. Trust between some member states and the regional institution has weakened. The security environment has deteriorated, while the organisation’s traditional mechanisms for responding to political crises have been subjected to unprecedented scrutiny.

Yet the institution itself has survived.

Touray’s final months in office were marked by farewell engagements with regional leaders, including Côte d’Ivoire’s President Alassane Ouattara, as he prepared to hand over after four years at the helm.

His departure thus offers a moment for both reflection and recalibration.

The incoming leadership will inherit the responsibility of protecting the achievements accumulated since 1975 while addressing the weaknesses that have become increasingly apparent.

It will have to restore confidence in ECOWAS as an institution that delivers tangible benefits to ordinary West Africans, rather than one perceived principally through the lens of sanctions and political disputes.

It will also face the delicate question of relations with Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger and whether the fractures created during the Touray years can eventually be narrowed.

A new test for an old institution

The central question confronting ECOWAS after Touray is no longer simply how to deepen integration.

It is how to keep West Africa together in an era of growing political fragmentation.

The organisation has demonstrated over the past five decades that regional cooperation is possible. It has made movement across borders easier, established mechanisms for trade and created a regional framework for responding to conflict and political instability.

But the events of the past four years have shown that institutions alone cannot guarantee unity.

The next leadership will therefore be judged not merely by the number of protocols it adopts or summits it convenes, but by whether it can rebuild trust, improve regional security, remove barriers to commerce and make integration meaningful to citizens.

Touray leaves at a crossroads.

His four-year tenure will be remembered for an ECOWAS that confronted some of its deepest crises since its creation—and for an organisation that emerged from those crises smaller in membership, more politically divided and facing a fundamental question about its future.

The end of the Touray era is, therefore, not simply the end of one administration. It is the beginning of a new test of whether ECOWAS can turn its historic achievements into a renewed project of West African unity.

ECOWAS AT A CROSSROADS AS TOURAY ENDS FOUR-YEAR ERA

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Nigeria, India Sign Landmark Human Rights Pact, Fagbemi Backs Stronger Institutional Independence

Published

on

Nigeria, India Sign Landmark Human Rights Pact, Fagbemi Backs Stronger Institutional Independence

…AGF pledges justice ministry’s support for implementation, demands practical safeguards for citizens in AI era

By: Michael Mike

Nigeria and India have signed a bilateral agreement to strengthen human rights protection, institutional capacity and access to justice, with the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Prince Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, pledging the Federal Government’s support for its implementation.

Fagbemi, who described the agreement as a strategic partnership between the two countries, said its success would ultimately be measured by its impact on ordinary citizens, particularly vulnerable and marginalised groups seeking justice.

The agreement, executed between the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) of Nigeria and its Indian counterpart, is designed to deepen institutional cooperation, facilitate knowledge transfer, promote technical exchanges and strengthen operational capacity in addressing human rights violations.

The Attorney-General gave the government’s position on Tuesday in Abuja when he received a joint delegation of the two commissions at the Federal Ministry of Justice, describing the partnership as timely, particularly in an increasingly interconnected world where effective human rights protection requires stronger legal frameworks, institutional collaboration and respect for the rule of law.

The development followed a high-level engagement between the two commissions and the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), at the Supreme Court Complex, Abuja, on Monday, as part of a two-day working visit by the Indian delegation.

The Nigerian delegation was led by the Executive Secretary of NHRC, Chief Tony Ojukwu, SAN, OFR, while the Indian delegation was headed by the Chairperson of India’s NHRC, Justice V. Ramasubramanian, accompanied by the Commission’s Joint Secretary, Mr. Samir Kumar.

Fagbemi said the partnership brought together two major democracies with shared common-law traditions, diverse populations and dynamic constitutional frameworks, expressing satisfaction with the thematic areas identified for cooperation under the agreement.

He specifically highlighted access to justice and the protection of digital rights as critical areas requiring urgent attention, particularly as emerging technologies, including Artificial Intelligence, continue to reshape society and create new human rights concerns.

According to him, both countries must develop legal safeguards to protect data privacy, prevent algorithmic bias and safeguard civic space, while ensuring that technological advancement does not undermine fundamental freedoms.

He said the Ministry of Justice expected the two commissions to produce actionable research and policy recommendations capable of addressing these emerging challenges.

Beyond emerging technologies, the Attorney-General stressed that Nigeria’s commitment to human rights must be reflected in the practical implementation of constitutional guarantees and international obligations, rather than merely in the existence of legal provisions.

He cited the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, which Nigeria domesticated through the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act, Cap. A9, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004, as a major instrument underpinning the country’s human rights jurisprudence.

The Charter provides important protections relating to non-discrimination, human dignity, fair trial and personal liberty, reinforcing the fundamental rights guaranteed under Nigeria’s Constitution.

Fagbemi maintained that the true measure of a country’s commitment to human rights was its ability to translate constitutional provisions into accessible institutions, accountable public authorities and an independent judiciary.

He assured the Indian delegation that the Federal Ministry of Justice fully supported the bilateral initiative and was prepared to facilitate technical engagements, joint legal reviews and policy consultations aimed at improving the efficiency of the justice sector.

The Attorney-General also used the engagement to reaffirm the institutional independence of Nigeria’s National Human Rights Commission, stressing that its autonomy was essential to its credibility and effectiveness.

He specifically drew attention to Section 6(3) of the National Human Rights Commission (Amendment) Act, 2010, which provides that the Commission, in exercising its statutory functions, shall not be subject to the direction or control of any other authority or person.

According to him, the administration has continued to respect and protect the Commission’s statutory independence, describing it as fundamental to institutional integrity.

He further noted that the relationship between the NHRC and the Federal Ministry of Justice had been characterised by constructive institutional synergy, mutual respect and a shared commitment to advancing human rights.

The Attorney-General commended Ojukwu and the Nigerian commission for spearheading the bilateral initiative, while expressing appreciation to the Indian delegation for bringing its expertise and institutional experience to the partnership.

Earlier, during Monday’s engagement with the Chief Justice of Nigeria, the Executive Secretary of NHRC Nigeria had emphasised the complementary responsibilities of the judiciary and national human rights institutions in protecting fundamental freedoms, upholding the rule of law and ensuring access to justice.

Ojukwu identified complaint management, Alternative Dispute Resolution, security sector accountability, comparative legal research, digital rights, Artificial Intelligence ethics and environmental justice as priority areas for cooperation between both countries.

The Chief Justice reaffirmed the commitment of the Nigerian Judiciary to human rights protection and encouraged both commissions to exchange experiences and adopt best practices, particularly in strengthening safeguards for vulnerable groups, including women, children and persons with disabilities.

The Indian delegation described the engagement as significant to relations between the two countries, noting that the MoU represented a first-of-its-kind institutional partnership for India’s National Human Rights Commission.

The agreement is expected to promote sustained institutional exchanges, strengthen complaint-handling mechanisms, improve professional capacity and encourage comparative research into legal and policy approaches to human rights protection.

The partnership also comes at a time when national human rights institutions face increasing demands to address abuses linked to security operations, discrimination, environmental degradation, digital surveillance and the misuse of emerging technologies.

For Nigeria, the collaboration offers an opportunity to strengthen its human rights enforcement architecture through international knowledge-sharing while reinforcing the independence and operational effectiveness of its national commission.

Fagbemi, however, cautioned that the ultimate benchmark of the agreement must go beyond official engagements and institutional exchanges to deliver tangible improvements in the lives of citizens, especially those most vulnerable to violations and denied access to justice.

He wished the Indian delegation a productive stay in Nigeria and expressed confidence that the partnership would advance the shared commitment of both countries to human dignity, justice and the protection of fundamental rights.

Nigeria, India Sign Landmark Human Rights Pact, Fagbemi Backs Stronger Institutional Independence

Continue Reading

News

NSCDC Strengthens Gender Policy Implementation, Trains Officers on SGBV, Digital Safety

Published

on

NSCDC Strengthens Gender Policy Implementation, Trains Officers on SGBV, Digital Safety

By: Michael Mike

Corps partners SPRING, FCDO, TechHer to promote women’s participation in peacebuilding, tackle technology-facilitated violence

The Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) has intensified efforts to combat sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV), strengthen women’s participation in security decision-making and promote digital safety among young people through the implementation of its Gender Policy II.

The Commandant-General of the Corps, Prof. Ahmed Audi, stated this at a two-day Gender, Women, Peace and Security capacity-building training organised at the NSCDC College and Support Staff Service, Udege, Nasarawa State.

The training was organised in collaboration with Strengthening Peace and Resilience in Nigeria (SPRING), with support from the United Kingdom’s Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO).

Audi, who delivered his keynote address through a representative, said the policy provided a framework for mainstreaming gender considerations into the Corps’ operations, personnel management, leadership structure and community engagement.

He stressed the need for effective prevention and response to sexual and gender-based violence, including conflict-related abuses and technology-facilitated violence.

The Commandant-General also called for increased participation of women in peacebuilding and security decision-making, equal opportunities within the Corps and stronger partnerships with traditional institutions, government agencies, civil society organisations and development partners.

He urged commands and personnel, particularly Gender Desk Officers, to ensure effective coordination, timely reporting, appropriate referrals, monitoring and accountability in handling gender-related cases.

Audi described the implementation of the policy as a collective responsibility requiring sustained commitment across all levels of the Corps.

In a goodwill message, the Osu Ajiri of Edege Chiefdom, Alhaji Suleiman Ahmed Eko IV, commended the NSCDC for its presence in the community, saying its operations had strengthened the sense of security among residents, particularly farmers.

The traditional ruler pledged the support of his council in addressing gender-based violence, describing the protection of the community as a priority.

Earlier, the Commander of the College, ACG Jamilu Indabawa, said collaboration among relevant stakeholders was critical to achieving effective implementation of the gender policy.

The Gender Equality, Diversity and Social Inclusion Lead of SPRING, Mrs Amina Akano-Bello, said the training was designed to promote peaceful and resilient communities through early identification and response to gender-based violence, as well as the inclusion of women and young people in leadership.

Also, the NSCDC National Headquarters Gender Unit Adviser, DCC Ajet Kemi, provided participants with insights into the different forms of sexual and gender-based violence, their societal implications and preventive measures.

A retired Assistant Commandant-General, Ahmed Abodurin, who facilitated a session on institutional ethics in gender policy implementation, emphasised professionalism, accountability, gender sensitivity and adherence to institutional standards.

Beyond the capacity-building exercise, the Corps partnered TechHer, an organisation promoting women’s advancement through technology, to extend digital safety awareness to schools in Udege.

The outreach, themed “Stop Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence”, educated students on the dangers of digital abuse, responsible online behaviour and measures for staying safe in digital spaces.

Representatives of the Federal Ministry of Interior, Nasarawa State Ministry of Women Affairs and Social Development, Nasarawa State Ministry of Justice and Gammuo International also delivered goodwill messages, reaffirming the importance of collective action in advancing gender equality, peace and security.

NSCDC Strengthens Gender Policy Implementation, Trains Officers on SGBV, Digital Safety

Continue Reading

News

Bank customer alleges N2.59m theft from two GTBank accounts

Published

on

Bank customer alleges N2.59m theft from two GTBank accounts

By: Michael Mike

A customer of Guaranty Trust Bank, Stella Adepegba, has accused the bank of negligence after fraudsters allegedly stole N2.59m from two accounts belonging to her and her daughter within 24 days.

Adepegba said the incidents occurred on October 8 and November 1, 2026, with the perpetrators allegedly transferring funds without authorisation or security notifications.

She accused the bank of failing to refund the money despite repeated complaints and assurances that the matter would be resolved.

According to her, the first incident involved her daughter, Victoria Adepegba, whose Child Saver’s Account was allegedly compromised on October 8 at about 8pm.

She explained that N2.507m was transferred through the Nigeria Inter-Bank Settlement System Instant Payment channel in four transactions, leaving less than N2,000 in the account.

Adepegba said N399,000, N398,000 and N220,000 were transferred to a Moniepoint account bearing the name Abdulmalik Idris, while another N1.49m went to a GoMoney account bearing the name Zainab Ibrahim.

She alleged that no debit alerts were received, adding that a GTBank employee informed her of the transactions and offered to block the account after the money had already been withdrawn.

The complainant said she reported the incident at the bank’s Kubwa branch in Abuja on October 9 and was instructed to document the unauthorised transactions.

However, she alleged that the bank subsequently sent an email attributing the transactions to compromised login credentials, an explanation she rejected.

Adepegba said another N80,000 was fraudulently transferred from her personal GTBank account on November 1 to a FairMoney account bearing the name Jamilu Ahmad, bringing the cumulative loss to N2.587m.

“GTB could not explain how the hackers successfully stole my money despite changing my account’s log-in details after the attack on my daughter’s account. The bank must refund the stolen funds and go after those who masterminded the fraud,” she said.

She insisted that her mobile phone, SIM card and ATM card were in her possession during both incidents, adding that she neither disclosed her banking credentials nor received OTP requests.

“The implication of these targeted attacks on my bank accounts is that no customer’s funds are safe with GTB, and if anything happens, the bank will not accept responsibility or offer any succour whatsoever,” she lamented.

She stated that a compliance officer, Innocent Ukatu, and the bank’s media consultant, Cornelius Onuoha, initially assured her that the complaint would be resolved.

Reacting to the incident, the Chief Communications Officer of Guaranty Trust Holding Company Plc, Mrs Oyinade Adegite, said the incidents had been investigated and feedback provided to the customer.

She attributed the compromise to customer-side security vulnerabilities, explaining that fraudsters increasingly deploy sophisticated phishing techniques to obtain banking credentials.

“Immediately this came up, it was escalated and investigated, and feedback has been given,” she said.

Adegite explained that customers could unknowingly compromise their accounts by clicking malicious links that install malware that can capture sensitive information.

“Now it’s a phishing link you might click on that sometimes would actually install malware on your phone,” she said.

She maintained that the bank had implemented the necessary security safeguards, including two-factor authentication, and insisted the compromise originated on the customer’s end.

“All the measures the bank has to put in place for us, 2FA, everything was done. So, the compromise came clearly from the customer,” she stated.

However, she expressed sympathy for the losses and said she would follow up on the second incident to explore possible intervention.

The allegations come amid regulatory scrutiny of Nigerian banks over consumer protection and compliance failures.

An earlier analysis of audited financial statements showed that Guaranty Trust Holding Company, GTBank’s parent company, incurred N383.65m in regulatory penalties in Nigeria in 2024.

The sanctions included N56m for consumer protection violations, N160.4m following a Central Bank of Nigeria mystery shopping exercise, N149.25m for compliance-related issues and bank email returns, and N18m following a foreign exchange examination.

Bank customer alleges N2.59m theft from two GTBank accounts

Continue Reading

Trending

Verified by MonsterInsights