News
Edo 2024: Time to End the Hopeless and Helpless Technocratic and MoU Mirage,
Edo 2024: Time to End the Hopeless and Helpless Technocratic and MoU Mirage,
By Augustine Osayande
As the Edo 2024 elections approach, there is a growing call to move beyond the current technocratic leadership and Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs) that have dominated the developmental space of the state in the past eight years. Many critics, including this writer, have long argued that the administration of Governor Godwin Obaseki failed to deliver meaningful progress for the state. The so-called technocratic and MoU approach has become a mirage, offering promises of development that remain unfulfilled for the people of Edo State.
As Governor Godwin Obaseki’s tenure draws to a close, the people of Edo State are left with a pressing question: what were the tangible outcomes of the numerous MoUs signed during his administration?
One notable MoU was with China Harbour Engineering Company Limited (CHEC) for the development of the Gelegele Seaport and other transport infrastructure. This ambitious project promised to be a game-changer for Edo’s economy by enhancing the state’s connectivity and boosting trade. Yet, the public remains eager to see whether these promises have translated into visible progress or if they remain unfulfilled aspirations.
Similarly, the partnership with Sunora Foods was heralded as a transformative initiative aimed at attracting $100 million in foreign direct investment and creating 25,000 jobs. This MoU raised h4opes for significant agro-economic development. However, it is crucial for Edo citizens to assess whether these projections have materialized into real opportunities for employment and economic growth in the state.
Another significant MoU was signed with the Aig-Imoukhuede Foundation and the Private Sector Health Alliance of Nigeria (PSHAN) to improve healthcare delivery. Healthcare is a critical area of public concern, and the impact of this agreement on the quality and accessibility of healthcare services in Edo is something that residents will undoubtedly scrutinize.
The MoU with Oando Clean Energy Limited for the deployment of electric buses to enhance the state’s transportation system was a bold step towards sustainable development. Yet, with Obaseki’s tenure ending, there is a lingering question of whether these green initiatives have taken root or if they remain at the planning stage.
In the agricultural sector, the MoU with Heifer International Ltd and Amo Farm Sieberer Hatchery Ltd aimed to boost the poultry value chain in Edo. This initiative was expected to enhance food security and create jobs, but how far these goals have been met remains to be seen.
Edo State’s partnership with SIEMENS for economic development, and the tripartite deal involving the Chinese Government and Yongxing Steel Company to bolster vocational and technical education, were both touted as forward-thinking initiatives designed to strengthen the state’s human capital and industrial base. However, Edo citizens are still waiting to see the concrete benefits of these partnerships.
The agreement with Radisson Hotel Group for a N19.6 billion world-class hotel project promised to enhance the state’s hospitality industry and attract tourism. The potential for economic growth through such investments is immense, but residents are eager to know if these projects are on track or have stalled.
Furthermore, the MoU with EHA Clinics to improve primary healthcare delivery and the partnership with LAPO Microfinance Bank for the disbursement of N300 million to MSMEs across the 18 Local Government Areas were both aimed at uplifting the socio-economic standards of the state. As Obaseki’s administration concludes, the effectiveness and reach of these initiatives will likely be a key measure of his legacy.
Ultimately, while Governor Obaseki’s administration has signed numerous MoUs with the promise of transformative change across various sectors, the real test lies in the execution and visible outcomes of these agreements. As Edo State looks towards the future, its citizens deserve a transparent assessment of these initiatives to understand their true impact on the state’s development.
With few days to the end of Obaseki’s eight-year administration, it is crystal clear that this model has not effectively addressed the fundamental challenges facing the state, such as poverty, unemployment, inadequate infrastructure, and poor public services. The technocratic governance has resulted in policies that are disconnected from the realities of everyday citizens, creating a sense of hopelessness and helplessness among the populace.
Another prominent characteristic of the outgoing Obaseki administration has been the reluctance of many Senior Special Assistants (SSAs) and Special Advisers (SAs) to recognize that good governance and quality leadership are not bound by political party lines. Instead of embracing constructive criticism as a tool for improvement, these officials often resort to dismissive behavior, targeting those who offer guidance or critique.
This approach fails to acknowledge a fundamental truth: effective governance benefits everyone, not just members of a specific political party. When a government prioritizes the delivery of democratic dividends—such as improved infrastructure, better public services, robust economic growth, and enhanced living standards—the positive impact is felt across the entire population, transcending party affiliations.
Good governance is about serving the public interest and meeting the needs of the people, regardless of their political leanings. By fostering an environment where all feedback is valued and constructive dialogue is encouraged, leaders can drive forward policies and initiatives that truly serve the common good. It is essential for future administrations to recognize that inclusive leadership and accountability are key pillars of sustainable development, and that true success in governance is measured by the tangible improvements in the lives of all citizens, not just those who support a particular political ideology.
The call is now for a shift towards leadership that prioritizes inclusivity, grassroots engagement, and a people-centered approach, where decisions are made with direct input from the communities they affect. This change is seen as essential to break free from the cycle of unmet promises and to pave the way for a more hopeful and prosperous future for Edo State. Look
As Edo State gears up for the 2024 elections, the debate continues over the best path forward—whether to maintain the status quo or to embrace a new direction that truly reflects the needs and aspirations of its citizens. The call to end the “hopeless and helpless technocratic mirage” is a rallying cry for those seeking a leadership that not only speaks of change but delivers it in tangible, impactful ways.
Augustine Osayande PhD contributed this piece from Abuja via austinelande@yahoo.com
Edo 2024: Time to End the Hopeless and Helpless Technocratic and MoU Mirage,
News
Between Hope and History: What Nigerians Expect from Tegbe as Power Minister
Between Hope and History: What Nigerians Expect from Tegbe as Power Minister
By: Michael Olukayode
For decades, electricity has remained Nigeria’s most enduring national embarrassment. From military administrations to democratic governments, promises of stable power supply have come and gone with little to show beyond recurring darkness, collapsing grids, abandoned projects and rising public frustration.
Now, with the appointment of Joseph Olasunkanmi Tegbe as Minister of Power, expectations are once again rising. Yet unlike in previous eras, Nigerians are no longer impressed by ambitious declarations. They are demanding results.
The question confronting Tegbe is not whether he understands the scale of the crisis. It is whether he can succeed where many before him failed.
Nigeria’s electricity sector is littered with the ruins of grand promises.
From the Olusegun Obasanjo administration’s multi-billion dollar National Integrated Power Projects (NIPP), to the Goodluck Jonathan-era privatisation of generation and distribution companies, successive governments repeatedly promised that stable electricity was around the corner. Under former President Muhammadu Buhari, Nigerians were told that the Siemens-backed Presidential Power Initiative would revolutionise transmission and distribution. The current administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu also pledged sweeping reforms, improved generation and a more efficient market-driven electricity sector.
Yet millions of Nigerians still rely on generators as their primary source of power.
The irony remains painful: Africa’s largest economy continues to generate barely between 4,000 and 5,000 megawatts for over 200 million people, despite an installed capacity exceeding 13,000MW.
Entire industries have collapsed under the burden of self-generated electricity. Small businesses spend more on diesel than on salaries. Manufacturers complain of rising operational costs. Students study under torchlights. Hospitals struggle to preserve vaccines and operate life-saving equipment. For many Nigerians, electricity is not merely an infrastructure issue; it is the dividing line between poverty and productivity.
That is why Tegbe’s appointment comes with enormous pressure.
Unlike many previous political appointees in the sector, Tegbe comes into office with the image of a technocrat rather than a career politician. A chartered accountant and management consultant, he built his reputation in the private sector through years of corporate advisory work, investment strategy and institutional restructuring. He previously served as the Director-General and Global Liaison for the Nigeria-China Strategic Partnership, where he was credited with helping to deepen investment engagement between Nigeria and Chinese investors in infrastructure, manufacturing and industrial development initiatives.
Before that appointment, Tegbe had a long corporate career spanning consulting, finance and business transformation. He worked with multinational consulting firm Deloitte and later became a senior business strategist with extensive experience in public-private partnerships, governance systems and economic planning. Supporters argue that this background gives him a better understanding of the financial and structural complexities that have crippled Nigeria’s power sector for years.
His defenders also point to his record in economic coordination and institutional reforms, arguing that the electricity crisis is no longer just a technical problem but a management and governance challenge requiring strategic execution, investor confidence and policy discipline.
At his Senate screening, Tegbe outlined a reform agenda focused on improving gas supply, strengthening grid reliability, accelerating metering, enforcing accountability among distribution companies and restoring financial discipline across the sector.
Those priorities are significant because Nigeria’s electricity crisis is no longer just about generation. The problems are systemic.
Generation companies complain of unpaid debts and inadequate gas supply. Distribution companies struggle with huge financial losses, weak infrastructure, electricity theft and poor revenue collection. Transmission infrastructure remains fragile and outdated, leading to frequent system collapses and stranded power capacity.
The national grid itself has become symbolic of institutional weakness. Grid collapses have repeatedly plunged large sections of the country into darkness, disrupting businesses and exposing the fragility of the system. Regulatory reports continue to show wide gaps between installed generation capacity and actual available electricity supply.
For many Nigerians, these recurring failures have destroyed public confidence.
Citizens openly question whether government officials genuinely intend to solve the crisis or merely manage it politically. Some blame corruption and weak regulation; others argue that decades of policy inconsistency and poor implementation are the real culprits.
That skepticism explains why Tegbe’s promises are being greeted with cautious optimism rather than celebration.
Still, his supporters believe he enters office with certain advantages. His experience in corporate restructuring and investment negotiations may prove useful in a sector desperate for efficiency, investor confidence and credible execution. But technical knowledge alone will not solve Nigeria’s electricity crisis.
What the sector requires most is political courage.
Any meaningful reform will involve difficult decisions: enforcing payment discipline, restructuring failing distribution companies, addressing subsidy distortions, improving tariff transparency, tackling electricity theft and compelling stronger private sector accountability. These reforms are politically sensitive because electricity affects every household and business in the country.
The minister must also confront the deeper institutional problem that has undermined previous reforms — weak governance.
Over the years, billions of dollars have reportedly been invested in power infrastructure with minimal impact on supply. Projects are often launched with fanfare only to disappear into bureaucratic delays, contractual disputes or funding crises. Nigerians have grown weary of ceremonial commissioning without measurable outcomes.
That is why measurable targets will matter more than speeches.
If Tegbe hopes to build public trust, Nigerians will expect clear timelines, transparent reporting and visible improvements in supply stability. Citizens want fewer excuses and more accountability. They want to know why power plants cannot get gas despite Nigeria’s enormous natural gas reserves. They want to know why transmission bottlenecks continue years after repeated intervention programmes. They want to know why estimated billing still persists despite promises of mass metering.
Most importantly, they want leadership that acknowledges that electricity is central to national development.
No serious industrial economy can thrive in darkness.
Countries that transformed their economies invested heavily in stable electricity infrastructure. Without reliable power, Nigeria’s ambitions for industrialisation, digital innovation, manufacturing growth and foreign investment will remain severely constrained.
The challenge before Tegbe therefore goes beyond fixing transformers or stabilising the grid. His real assignment is to restore credibility to a sector where public trust has nearly collapsed.
There are signs that structural reforms may finally be gaining momentum. The Electricity Act 2023 has opened the door for states to develop independent electricity markets, reducing overdependence on the fragile national grid. Several states are already moving toward decentralised power arrangements.
But Nigerians have heard reform language before.
What they seek now is evidence.
The success or failure of Tegbe’s tenure may ultimately depend on one simple question: can his administration deliver stable and predictable improvement, even if gradual?
If he succeeds, he could become the minister who finally begins the long-delayed transformation of Nigeria’s electricity sector.
If he fails, he risks joining a long list of officials whose promises disappeared into the darkness Nigerians know too well.
Between Hope and History: What Nigerians Expect from Tegbe as Power Minister
News
Gombe guber: APC clears Gwamna to contest in 2027
Gombe guber: APC clears Gwamna to contest in 2027
The All Progressives Congress (APC) has officially cleared Dr Jamil Isyaku Gwamna to participate in the forthcoming gubernatorial race in Gombe State.
This is contained in a press statement issued to journalists in Gombe on Saturday by Mr Ibrahim Sani Shawai, the media aide to Dr Gwamna.
According to the statement, the screening took place today at Kaduna State Governor’s Lodge, Plot 37,Jose Marti Street, Asokoro, Abuja and was
conducted in line with the provisions of the party’s constitution and internal guidelines governing the nomination process.
The statement read that the screening committee headed by Dr Benjamin Obi Nwoye stated that Gwamna had satisfactorily fulfilled all constitutional and procedural requirements necessary to participate in the party’s governorship process ahead of the upcoming elections.
Responding shortly after the screening, Dr Gwamna expressed appreciation to the leadership of the APC for conducting what he described as a transparent, credible, and rigorous exercise aimed at strengthening internal democracy and ensuring quality leadership within the party.
“I am honoured to have successfully gone through this important constitutional process of our great party. This exercise further strengthens confidence in the democratic values and internal structures of the APC,” he stated.
Gwamna reaffirmed his determination to consolidate the developmental strides recorded in Gombe State under the leadership of Muhammadu Inuwa Yahaya, CON.
“Our vision is to ensure that, Gombe State works better for every citizen, regardless of background or status. We are committed to building on existing achievements while introducing new ideas that will further improve the lives of our people,” Gwamna added.
The APC governorship candidate also commended the performances of Governor Inuwa Yahaya and Bola Ahmed Tinubu, saying their leadership and developmental achievements have continued to strengthen public confidence in the APC at both state and national levels.
According to him, the visible progress recorded under the current administrations would further energise the party’s support base and make the APC’s campaign message more compelling to the people.
Gwamna also called on party members and supporters to remain united, disciplined, and focused, stressing that the success of the APC in Gombe State depends on collective effort, mutual respect, and a shared commitment to progress.
Gombe guber: APC clears Gwamna to contest in 2027
News
One killed, five injured during violent clash at peace meeting in Plateau
One killed, five injured during violent clash at peace meeting in Plateau
By: Zagazola Makama
A peace meeting between local residents and Fulani community members in Pankshin Local Government Area of Plateau State turned violent on Thursday, leaving one person dead and five others injured after youths allegedly attempted to disarm soldiers deployed to maintain security during the engagement.
Security sources told Zagazola Makama that the incident occurred at about 3:00 p.m. on May 7 at Mier village, where troops of Sector 8 under Operation Enduring Peace (OPEP), deployed at Fier guard post, had organised a stakeholders’ meeting aimed at easing tensions between locals and Fulani residents in the area.
The sources said the meeting was part of ongoing confidence-building and peace restoration efforts by security forces following recent incidents of communal violence, cattle rustling, reprisal attacks, and growing mistrust between farming and pastoral communities across parts of Plateau State.

According to the sources, the meeting was progressing peacefully before a group of agitated youths reportedly became hostile and attempted to forcefully seize the rifles of two soldiers providing security at the venue.
“The situation suddenly turned violent when some youths moved aggressively toward the troops and attempted to disarm two soldiers,” a security source said.
The source added that amid the struggle and confusion, one of the soldiers discharged his weapon in self-defence to prevent the mob from overpowering the troops.
Following the incident, one local resident sustained fatal injuries and was later confirmed dead, while four other civilians and one soldier were injured during the confrontation.
The injured persons were immediately evacuated to nearby medical facilities for treatment, while the corpse of the deceased was deposited at the General Hospital morgue in Pankshin.
Security operatives subsequently reinforced the area to prevent further breakdown of law and order, while efforts were intensified to calm tensions among residents.
The four youths who attacked the soldiers were arrested.
The latest violence occurred amid heightened security concerns and recurring communal clashes across Plateau State, where troops of Operation Enduring Peace have continued to conduct patrols, peace engagements, arrests, and intelligence-driven operations to contain reprisals and attacks involving armed militias, bandits, and cattle rustlers.
Military and community leaders have repeatedly urged residents to avoid taking the law into their hands and to cooperate with security agencies to sustain peace efforts across the state.
One killed, five injured during violent clash at peace meeting in Plateau
-
News2 years agoRoger Federer’s Shock as DNA Results Reveal Myla and Charlene Are Not His Biological Children
-
Opinions4 years agoTHE PLIGHT OF FARIDA
-
News1 year agoFAILED COUP IN BURKINA FASO: HOW TRAORÉ NARROWLY ESCAPED ASSASSINATION PLOT AMID FOREIGN INTERFERENCE CLAIMS
-
News2 years agoEYN: Rev. Billi, Distortion of History, and The Living Tamarind Tree
-
Opinions4 years agoPOLICE CHARGE ROOMS, A MINTING PRESS
-
ACADEMICS2 years agoA History of Biu” (2015) and The Lingering Bura-Pabir Question (1)
-
Columns2 years agoArmy University Biu: There is certain interest, but certainly not from Borno.
-
Opinions2 years agoTinubu,Shettima: The epidemic of economic, insecurity in Nigeria
