Politics

Kashim Shettima: The Echoes on the Streets of New York

Published

3 weeks ago

September 24, 2026

Ochuwa Ibrahim

Kashim Shettima: The Echoes on the Streets of New York

By: Dr James Bwala

Sharp partisan divisions often shape public opinion about Nigeria’s political leadership. At home, critics of the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and Vice President Kashim Shettima frequently present the government as disconnected from the realities of ordinary Nigerians. They point to inflation, insecurity, unemployment and the rising cost of living as evidence that the administration’s policies have brought more hardship than relief. In this atmosphere, it is easy to assume that Nigerians living abroad share the same negative assessment.

However, the interaction between Vice President Kashim Shettima and Nigerians in the United States during the 2026 United Nations General Assembly presents a different narrative. The response of the Nigerian diaspora, particularly in New York, suggests that many Nigerians abroad are not merely critics observing from a distance. They are stakeholders who recognise the difficulty of reform, appreciate the direction of the government and remain willing to contribute their skills, resources and ideas to national development. The echoes from New York therefore carry an important message: despite legitimate concerns, the Tinubu-Shettima administration is beginning to inspire confidence among Nigerians who understand both Nigeria’s challenges and its enormous potential.

When Vice President Shettima called on Nigerians in the diaspora to support the administration’s efforts to transform the national economy, his appeal was met with a response that went beyond political slogans. It was an appeal for partnership. Nigerians living in the United States occupy important positions in medicine, technology, education, finance, engineering, business and public administration. Many have acquired knowledge and experience in countries with strong institutions and advanced economies. Shettima described the diaspora community as “the greatest resource of the future,” emphasising that their contribution to Nigeria extends beyond financial remittances. Their expertise, professional networks and understanding of global best practices are equally valuable.

Shettima described the diaspora community as “the greatest resource of the future”. This statement reflects a reality that Nigeria can no longer ignore. The country has millions of citizens living abroad, many of whom maintain strong emotional and economic ties with their homeland. They send money to their families, establish businesses, support hospitals and schools, invest in real estate and provide assistance during emergencies. More importantly, they possess intellectual capital that can support the transformation of Nigeria’s education, health, science, technology and agricultural sectors.

The Vice President’s message in New York was therefore persuasive because it recognised Nigerians abroad not as outsiders, but as partners in nation-building. Rather than treating the diaspora as a source of remittances alone, the government is seeking to engage them as participants in the country’s development. This approach is essential because national transformation requires more than government action. It requires cooperation among public institutions, private investors, professionals, civil society organisations and citizens at home and abroad.

One of the central arguments presented by Vice President Shettima was that the Tinubu administration inherited a difficult economic situation but chose to confront it through bold reforms. Since assuming office, President Tinubu has defended major decisions aimed at restructuring the Nigerian economy. These decisions, including the removal of fuel subsidies and changes in the foreign exchange system, have been controversial because of their immediate impact on households and businesses. Yet, supporters of the reforms argue that the previous system was financially unsustainable and incapable of delivering long-term prosperity.

A government should not be judged only by the discomfort created by reform but also by the problems the reform is designed to solve. Nigeria’s economy had suffered from weak public finances, distorted incentives, declining investor confidence and pressure on foreign exchange. Continuing with the old approach might have produced temporary political comfort, but it would not have addressed the underlying weaknesses. The courage to make difficult decisions is not enough by itself, but it is an essential first step towards economic recovery.

President Tinubu’s willingness to act without spending his early years blaming his predecessor is significant. In many developing democracies, governments often dedicate valuable time to explaining why previous administrations failed. While accountability is important, it must not become an excuse for inaction. The Tinubu and Shettima administration, choosing to take responsibility for the country’s situation, has placed the burden of performance on itself. The public is entitled to demand results, but it should also acknowledge the importance of leadership that accepts responsibility and attempts to correct structural problems.

According to the vice president, the reforms are already producing measurable improvements. He cited the increase in foreign reserves from approximately 3.9 billion dollars to more than 55 billion dollars, as well as economic growth of 4.45 per cent in the most recent quarter. These figures, if sustained and properly managed, can strengthen Nigeria’s capacity to meet its international obligations, stabilise the currency and attract investment. They may also improve the security of remittances sent by Nigerians abroad and protect the value of investments made by members of the diaspora.

Nevertheless, economic statistics must be interpreted responsibly. Growth in gross domestic product does not automatically mean that every household is better off. Foreign reserves can rise while citizens continue to struggle with high food prices. A stronger macroeconomic position must eventually translate into lower inflation, more employment, improved public services and greater purchasing power. The credibility of the administration will depend on whether the gains celebrated in official statements are felt in markets, homes, schools, hospitals and workplaces.

This is why the vice president’s engagement with the diaspora is important. Nigerians abroad can serve as an informed bridge between government claims and international standards. They understand the need for economic discipline, but they also know that reform must be accompanied by social protection, transparency and measurable improvements in living conditions. Their support should not be interpreted as unconditional approval. Rather, it should be considered a willingness to encourage what is working while demanding better performance where necessary.

The Dangote Refinery represents one of the developments frequently associated with Nigeria’s economic transformation. For many years, Nigeria exported crude oil while importing refined petroleum products. This contradiction placed pressure on foreign exchange and exposed citizens to supply disruptions and volatile prices. The successful operation of a large domestic refinery offers the possibility of reducing dependence on imports, strengthening local industry and creating jobs. It also demonstrates the importance of private-sector investment in areas that were previously dominated by government institutions.

The refinery alone will not solve all of Nigeria’s economic difficulties. Its benefits will depend on sound regulation, fair competition, reliable infrastructure and responsible pricing. However, it is an encouraging example of what can happen when Nigerian capital and entrepreneurial ambition are directed towards national production. Such projects can change the way the international community views Nigeria—from a country associated primarily with problems to one capable of undertaking complex industrial ventures.

The Vice President also highlighted the Nigeria Education Loan Fund, through which more than 1.29 million students in tertiary institutions have reportedly accessed approximately 125 billion naira since the programme began. Education is among the most important investments any government can make. A young and rapidly growing population needs access to quality education and practical skills if it is to become an asset rather than a burden. Without affordable higher education, many talented Nigerians will be excluded from opportunities simply because of their family income.

An effective student-loan system can expand access to tertiary education, but it must be managed with transparency and compassion. Students should not be trapped by unrealistic repayment conditions, while institutions must be held accountable for the quality of education they provide. The programme should also be accompanied by investments in vocational training, digital skills, research and innovation. Nigeria requires graduates who can create jobs, solve problems and compete in the global economy, not merely individuals holding certificates.

Security was another major issue addressed by the vice president. Nigeria continues to face terrorism, banditry, kidnapping, communal conflict and other forms of criminality. These challenges have damaged communities, discouraged investment and weakened public confidence. Shettima acknowledged that insecurity is not peculiar to Nigeria, but the fact that other countries face similar difficulties does not reduce the responsibility of the government to protect its citizens.

The administration must therefore combine military action with intelligence gathering, community engagement, judicial reform, border management and economic opportunities for vulnerable populations. He said security cannot be sustained by force alone. Citizens must trust security agencies, local communities must cooperate with authorities, and perpetrators must face justice. Young people who have no legitimate economic prospects are more vulnerable to recruitment by criminal groups. Consequently, security policy must be connected to education, employment and social development.

Perhaps the most important message from New York was the vice president’s call for national unity. Nigeria’s diversity is often portrayed as a permanent obstacle to progress, but diversity can also be a source of strength. The country’s many ethnic, religious and cultural communities possess different experiences and talents that can contribute to national development. The challenge is not diversity itself; the challenge is the use of identity for political manipulation and social division.

Shettima’s assertion that “whatever binds us together supersedes whatever divides us as a people” should be treated as a national principle. Nigerians may disagree about policies, parties and leaders, but they share a common interest in peace, prosperity and national stability. Constructive criticism is necessary in a democracy, but criticism should not become an excuse for undermining every national achievement. At the same time, appeals for unity should not be used to silence legitimate concerns. True unity is built through fairness, accountability and equal opportunity.

The applause and goodwill reported in New York should therefore be understood as a vote of encouragement, not a final verdict on the administration. Nigerians in the diaspora are capable of recognising progress while remaining aware of the hardships confronting families at home. Their response demonstrates that the government’s message can resonate beyond Nigeria when it is supported by credible reforms and sincere engagement.

The administration must now convert the goodwill of the diaspora into practical partnerships. It should create transparent channels for diaspora investment, simplify business registration, protect property rights, improve consular services and develop programmes that connect professionals abroad with institutions at home. Nigerians in the diaspora, for their part, should move beyond commentary and participate actively through investment, mentorship, research collaboration and advocacy.

The echoes on the streets of New York are significant because they challenge the assumption back home and on the minarets of the opposition-led positions.

*James Bwala, PhD, writes from Abuja.

Kashim Shettima: The Echoes on the Streets of New York

Politics

Community Food Banks: A Necessary Step Toward Food Security in Nigeria

Published

17 hours ago

October 16, 2026

News Net Global

Community Food Banks: A Necessary Step Toward Food Security in Nigeria

Community Food Banks: A Necessary Step Toward Food Security in Nigeria

By: Dr. James Bwala

Food insecurity and malnutrition remain among the most urgent challenges facing Nigeria. Although the country possesses considerable agricultural potential, millions of Nigerians still struggle to obtain adequate and nutritious food. Vulnerable groups—including children, pregnant women, lactating mothers, persons with disabilities, widows, and low-income households—are particularly affected. Rising living costs, insecurity, unemployment, displacement, and disruptions in agricultural production have further intensified the crisis.

It is against this background that the First Lady of Nigeria, Senator Oluremi Tinubu, CON, called on state governors to establish functional community food banks in each of their three senatorial districts. The call, made during the presentation of food items to the wife of the Katsina State Governor, Hajiya Zulaihat Dikko Radda, is timely and important. Community food banks can serve as practical, locally accessible mechanisms for supporting vulnerable Nigerians, reducing malnutrition, and strengthening the country’s food security system. However, for the program to succeed, state governments must demonstrate genuine commitment, transparency, effective coordination, and sustainable funding.

The food distribution in Katsina State was conducted under the Food Outreach Scheme of the Renewed Hope Initiative (RHI). Representing the First Lady, the wife of the Vice President, Hajiya Nana Shettima, announced that Katsina had become the 30th beneficiary of the scheme, following successful distributions to 29 states and the Federal Capital Territory. The achievement demonstrates the expanding reach of the initiative and its commitment to ensuring that federal interventions are not limited to a few regions or communities.

Launched in March 2024 under the Social Investment Programme of the Renewed Hope Initiative, the Food Outreach Scheme provides nutritional support to persons with disabilities, widows, and other vulnerable groups. Its purpose is not merely to distribute food items but also to ease household hardship and improve family well-being. In an economy where many families are forced to reduce the quantity and quality of food they consume, such interventions can prevent hunger from developing into severe malnutrition and other social problems.

The First Lady explained that the intervention is sustained through the generosity of two partners who provide two truckloads of food items every month. This support allows the initiative to assist two states monthly. The partnership reflects the value of cooperation between government and private stakeholders in responding to humanitarian challenges. Nevertheless, charitable contributions alone cannot meet Nigeria’s long-term food needs. They should complement, rather than replace, strong public policies that promote agricultural productivity, social protection, employment, and affordable access to nutritious food.

The announcement of the completion of the nationwide rollout of the National Community Food Bank Program is also significant. The program is designed to combat child malnutrition and support pregnant women and lactating mothers, who require adequate nutrition for healthy pregnancies, safe childbirth, and proper child development. Children who suffer from malnutrition may experience stunted growth, weak immunity, poor learning outcomes, and reduced productivity later in life. Addressing malnutrition early is therefore not only a humanitarian responsibility but also an investment in Nigeria’s future human capital.

Community food banks can make nutritional support more accessible and responsive to local needs. National and zonal programs may provide essential assistance, but their reach can be limited by distance, administrative bottlenecks, insecurity, and inadequate knowledge of local conditions. A food bank located within a community can identify vulnerable households more effectively and respond to emergencies more quickly. It can also coordinate with traditional rulers, religious institutions, women’s groups, health workers, civil society organizations, and local authorities to ensure that assistance reaches those who genuinely need it.

The First Lady was right to stress that federal and zonal interventions alone would not be sufficient to address the scale of the challenge. Nigeria’s population is large, and vulnerability is distributed across urban, rural, and displaced communities. State governments are closer to their people and are therefore better positioned to understand local patterns of hunger and malnutrition. They can identify communities affected by flooding, insecurity, drought, displacement, or economic hardship and design food-bank operations accordingly.

For this reason, every state should establish functional food banks in its three senatorial districts, rather than creating facilities that exist only on paper. A functional food bank must have adequate storage, reliable transportation, trained personnel, transparent management, and a clear system for identifying beneficiaries. It should maintain proper records of food inflows and outflows, monitor the quality and expiry dates of supplies, and establish mechanisms for receiving complaints. Without these safeguards, food banks could become vulnerable to diversion, politicization, or unequal distribution.

Transparency must be at the heart of the program. Food assistance should be distributed according to need, not political affiliation, ethnic identity, religious background, or personal connections. State governments should publish basic information about the quantities of food received, the communities covered, and the number of beneficiaries reached. Independent monitors, civil society organizations, community leaders, and the media should be allowed to observe and report on the process. Such openness would build public trust and discourage corruption.

Beneficiary selection also requires careful attention. While widows and persons with disabilities are important target groups, the program should include households facing extreme poverty, internally displaced persons, elderly people living alone, orphaned children, and families affected by conflict or natural disasters. Pregnant women and lactating mothers should be linked not only to food support but also to antenatal care, nutrition education, immunization, and other health services. Similarly, children receiving food assistance should be connected to schools, primary healthcare centers, and child-protection programs where appropriate.

Food banks should also support local agriculture. State governments can purchase a significant portion of their supplies from local farmers, cooperatives, and small-scale food processors. This approach would create a reliable market for farmers while ensuring that food assistance contributes to local economic development. Staple foods such as grains, legumes, tubers, vegetable oil, and fortified products can be sourced locally when quality and supply requirements are met. Such a model would help connect emergency food assistance with agricultural production and rural livelihoods.

The intervention in Katsina State illustrates how federal and state-level efforts can work together. Governor Dikko Umaru Radda described the event as a day of hope and renewed commitment to the welfare of the people. He noted that the intervention demonstrated the federal government’s resolve to reach vulnerable Nigerians at all levels and complemented the state government’s efforts to improve citizens’ well-being. This cooperation is essential because food insecurity cannot be solved by one level of government acting alone.

The governor also stated that his administration, in line with President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Agenda, is investing in education, healthcare, and agriculture. These sectors are closely connected to food security. Education improves household earning capacity and increases awareness of healthy nutrition. Healthcare helps prevent and treat illnesses associated with malnutrition. Agriculture increases food availability and creates employment. When these areas are strengthened together, emergency support can gradually give way to greater household self-reliance.

Security is equally important. Food cannot be produced, transported, or distributed effectively in communities where farmers fear attacks, roads are unsafe, or markets are disrupted. Governor Radda’s statement that his administration is supporting security agencies with necessary equipment highlights the link between security and food security. Insecurity has forced many farmers away from their fields, destroyed livelihoods, displaced families, and increased dependence on humanitarian aid. Governments must therefore protect farming communities, secure transportation routes, and create conditions that allow agricultural activity to resume safely.

At the same time, political leaders should ensure that food interventions remain focused on public welfare. Food distribution programs must not be used merely as instruments of political mobilization. Although Governor Radda urged Katsina residents to support the ruling party for continuity in governance and development, the success of the food-bank program should be measured by its impact on hunger, nutrition, accountability, and household resilience—not by political loyalty. Public resources and humanitarian assistance belong to the people and must serve all eligible citizens.

The appreciation expressed by Hajiya Zulaihat Dikko Radda to Senator Oluremi Tinubu is understandable. The Renewed Hope Initiative has continued to support women, persons with disabilities, widows, and other vulnerable groups through various social programs. Such interventions offer relief to families facing difficult circumstances. However, they should be implemented as part of a broader national strategy rather than as isolated acts of generosity. Nigeria requires a coordinated system that combines food banks, social safety nets, school feeding, agricultural support, maternal healthcare, nutrition education, and employment opportunities.

The anticipated distribution to Osun, Ogun, and Akwa Ibom States indicates that the Food Outreach Scheme will continue to expand. As more states become beneficiaries, lessons from Katsina and previous distributions should be carefully documented. Program managers should evaluate whether food reached the intended beneficiaries, whether the quantities were sufficient, whether rural communities were adequately covered, and whether the intervention produced measurable improvements in household nutrition. Evidence-based evaluation will help the government improve the scheme and use resources more efficiently.

Ultimately, the success of the National Community Food Bank Program will depend on sustained political will. Governors must move beyond verbal support and allocate funds for the establishment and maintenance of food banks in their senatorial districts. They should develop clear operating guidelines, establish independent oversight, and work with communities to create reliable distribution networks. The federal government, for its part, should provide technical assistance, promote national standards, coordinate partners, and ensure that states are supported without encouraging duplication or waste.

Nigeria has the human and agricultural resources to overcome food insecurity, but these resources must be organized through effective institutions and responsible leadership. Community food banks will not solve every problem, but they can provide an important safety net for people facing hunger and malnutrition. More importantly, they can serve as platforms for connecting vulnerable families to healthcare, agricultural opportunities, education, and social protection.

* James Bwala, PhD, writes from Abuja.

Community Food Banks: A Necessary Step Toward Food Security in Nigeria

Politics

2027: Tinubu deserves another term, Group mobilises Northeast for re-election

Published

1 day ago

October 16, 2026

Ochuwa Ibrahim

2027: Tinubu deserves another term, Group mobilises Northeast for re-election

A group under the auspices of Tinubu Must Go Again (TMGA) 2027 on Thursday took their campaign to Yola in Adamawa State to rally support for President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s re-election for a second term tenure.

Speaking at the rally in Yola Prof. Sheriff Almuhajir, TMGA’s National Coordinator described the turnout as a demonstration of the president’s support base in the North-East.

He said the gathering was part of efforts to counter claims that President Tinubu lacked sufficient support in Northern Nigeria ahead of the 2027 presidential election.

“The rally was organised voluntarily to demonstrate support for the president and communicate the administration’s reform agenda to Nigerians.

“We are here to inform Nigerians that Northern Nigeria understands the history of this country and the trajectory of its development.

“Nigeria was built through the contributions of leaders from different regions, and we believe the country must remain united,” he said.

He said the campaign believed the policies being pursued by the president would help lay the foundation for sustainable growth.

Almuhajir also highlighted President Tinubu’s contributions to the political advancement of Northern politicians, saying the president had supported three candidates from the region, two of whom were from Adamawa State.

According to him, the gesture reflected the president’s willingness to support the political aspirations of leaders from the North.

“As you can see thousands of young men and women marched for more than a kilometre in support of the campaign, while members of the public expressed solidarity along the route.

“We knew the president enjoyed support in Yola, but we did not expect this massive turnout,” he said.

Mustapha Ribadu, Secretary, All Progressive Congress (APC) in Adamawa, said they are committed to mobilising their people in support of Tinubu’s second-term ambition.

According to him, they will vote for APC from top to bottom aim to transform the country.

Dr Raymond Chidama, Deputy Chairman of the APC in Adamawa appreciated the organisers for choosing Adamawa as a starting point for the mobilisation drive.

According to him, the Yola rally was part of its nationwide strategy to engage young people, women, professionals and community leaders ahead of the 2027 election.

He called on the party supporters to get ready with their voters cards to vote for the party to come 2027 general elections.

The rally began from Unity flyover to Lamido Cinema.

2027: Tinubu deserves another term, Group mobilises Northeast for re-election

Politics

Atiku vs Shettima: Eight Years in the Vice Presidency Versus Less Than Four—Who Made the Bigger Impact?

Published

1 day ago

October 16, 2026

News Net Global

Atiku vs Shettima: Eight Years in the Vice Presidency Versus Less Than Four—Who Made the Bigger Impact?

Atiku vs Shettima: Eight Years in the Vice Presidency Versus Less Than Four—Who Made the Bigger Impact?

By: Dr James Bwala

Comparing the records of former Vice President Atiku Abubakar and Vice President Kashim Shettima requires more than political slogans, partisan loyalty, or emotional arguments. It demands an examination of their backgrounds, preparation for public service, roles in government, influence on national policy, and impact on the North-east region. Having worked as a journalist in both Maiduguri, Borno State, and Yola, Adamawa State, I have had the opportunity to interview both men, observe them closely, study their public records, and listen to ordinary Northerners discuss their leadership. These experiences have shaped my view that Kashim Shettima’s less than four years as vice president demonstrate stronger preparation, broader governmental experience, and a more visible commitment to regional development than Atiku Abubakar’s eight years in the same office.

This comparison acknowledges Atiku Abubakar’s political importance and Atiku Abubakar’s political importance or personal accomplishments. He remains a major figure in Nigerian politics and a former vice president who played a significant role in the country’s transition to civilian rule in 1999. However, political prominence should not be confused with effective leadership. A leader should be judged by the institutions he strengthens, the opportunities he creates, the infrastructure he supports, and the long-term direction he provides for the people he serves.

Atiku Abubakar remarkably rose from the Nigeria Customs Service to the position of deputy comptroller-general. His advancement within approximately nine years has often attracted public discussion and controversy, particularly because other officers with strong qualifications reportedly spent decades in the service without attaining similar heights. While questions surrounding his career progression deserve proper historical and institutional examination, the larger issue is what he did with the influence he gained after leaving the Customs Service and becoming vice president.

Atiku served as vice president from 1999 to 2007 under President Olusegun Obasanjo. The office of vice president in Nigeria is constitutionally limited, but Atiku was widely regarded as one of the most powerful vice presidents in the country’s history. He had substantial political influence, maintained a strong network across the country, and was deeply involved in the administration’s economic and political affairs. However, influence without a clear developmental legacy raises serious questions.

During those eight years, several industries and public enterprises that had historically supported the Northern economy continued to decline or collapsed. The textile industry, agricultural processing, manufacturing, and other productive sectors struggled to survive. Many communities that had depended on these industries experienced unemployment, declining commerce, and growing poverty. The question is not whether one individual – we should not blame one individual for every national failure. Rather, the question is whether a powerful vice president from the North-east used his influence to articulate and implement a clear development strategy for the region.

In my view, the answer is no.

The condition of major roads in the North-east during and after that period further illustrates the problem of inadequate long-term planning. The Gombe–Yola road, for example, became a symbol of neglect for many travellers. Those who used the road before subsequent administrations began rehabilitation projects experienced hardship that went beyond inconvenience. The road affected trade, education, healthcare, transportation, and family connections across the region. During journeys through the North-east, I have listened to travellers express anger and frustration over the condition of the road. Their complaints were not abstract political arguments; they were based on daily experiences.

A vice president may not directly control every road project, but a politically influential vice president can draw attention to neglected areas, influence national priorities, and build consensus around regional development. Atiku’s eight years in office provided sufficient time to establish a durable framework for the economic transformation of the North-east. Yet the region did not receive the kind of industrial revival, infrastructure expansion, or coordinated economic planning that its population required.

The contents of President Olusegun Obasanjo’s memoirs and his public comments about Atiku have also contributed to the controversies surrounding the former vice president. Those disagreements revealed the tensions within the administration and raised concerns about accountability, trust, and the use of political power. Although political memoirs are often shaped by personal perspectives, they remain important documents for assessing the relationship between leaders and understanding how government functioned during that period.

It is possible to acknowledge Atiku Abubakar as a devoted father and husband while questioning his record as a national leader. Private virtues and public performance are not always the same. A person may be admirable in family life but ineffective in public office. In evaluating a vice president, however, the central concern must be the impact of his public service on the nation.

Kashim Shettima presents a different profile. Before entering the public spotlight, he obtained a master’s degree and developed a reputation as a serious reader and student of public affairs. His academic preparation and intellectual interests were evident in his speeches and public engagements. More importantly, his experience was built gradually through several levels of responsibility.

Before becoming governor of Borno State, Shettima served as commissioner in several ministries, including education, finance, agriculture, local government, and health. This range of assignments exposed him to different aspects of public administration. He gained experience in budgeting, social services, agriculture, local governance, and healthcare. Such exposure is important because effective national leadership requires an understanding of how different sectors interact.

Shettima did not enter executive leadership as a political novice. He served as governor of Borno State for eight years during one of the most difficult periods in the state’s history. The Boko Haram insurgency had devastated communities, displaced families, disrupted education, damaged infrastructure, and weakened the local economy. Governing Borno under those conditions required crisis management, political coordination, and sustained engagement with federal institutions and international partners.

No administration is without flaws, and Shettima’s tenure should not be treated as beyond criticism. Nevertheless, he inherited an exceptionally difficult security and humanitarian situation and remained engaged with the state’s recovery. His experience as governor gave him a practical understanding of the challenges facing ordinary citizens, particularly in the North-east. That experience also prepared him for national responsibilities in a way that cannot be measured merely by titles.

His subsequent service in the Senate further strengthened his legislative and national experience. In the Senate, he participated in debates on national issues and worked within the institutions responsible for lawmaking and oversight. By the time he became vice president, he had served as a banker, commissioner, governor, and senator. His career followed a clear progression through professional, executive, and legislative responsibilities.

As vice president, Shettima has operated in a difficult national environment marked by inflation, insecurity, unemployment, poverty, and pressure on household incomes. These challenges are not easy to resolve within a short period. However, in less than four years, his public activities have reflected a strong emphasis on regional integration, economic coordination, and engagement with development institutions.

The North-east Development Commission has been particularly important in this regard. The commission has supported projects and interventions across Bauchi, Borno, Yobe, Gombe, Taraba, and Adamawa. Roads, schools, health facilities, agricultural projects, and other infrastructure have received attention. It would be inaccurate to attribute every project directly to the vice president, but his political support and advocacy have helped keep the North-east’s development needs visible within the national agenda.

The Abuja–Jos–Maiduguri road project is another example of the scale of infrastructure being pursued. A road linking the Federal Capital Territory to major communities across the North and extending towards Maiduguri has significant implications for trade, mobility, security, and national integration. It represents a broader vision than isolated interventions. When major roads are completed, farmers can reach markets more easily, businesses can move goods at lower cost, students can access schools, and patients can reach hospitals more safely.

The difference between the two vice presidents is therefore not simply the number of years they spent in office. It is also the manner in which they used power and the developmental vision they brought to public service. Atiku’s eight years offered enough time and influence to create a transformative regional programme, yet the industrial and infrastructural decline experienced by the North remained largely unaddressed. Shettima, in less than four years, has promoted a more visible regional-development agenda through institutional support and national projects.

Critics may argue that comparing Atiku’s eight years with Shettima’s less than four years is unfair because the political, economic, and security circumstances of the two periods differ. That argument has merit. Nigeria in 1999 was emerging from military rule, while the present administration faces a different set of challenges. The powers of a vice president also depend heavily on the relationship with the president and the internal structure of the administration.

Nevertheless, context should not become an excuse for avoiding accountability. Every leader works within limitations, but leadership is demonstrated by the ability to identify priorities, mobilise resources, and create institutions that outlive an individual tenure. Time alone cannot guarantee success. A leader may serve for eight years and leave little lasting impact, while another may achieve meaningful progress in a shorter period.

The people of the North-east deserve evidence rather than political propaganda. Supporters of Atiku Abubakar should present concrete achievements from his eight years as vice president, particularly in the areas of industry, roads, employment, education, agriculture, and regional economic planning. Likewise, supporters of Kashim Shettima must continue to provide verifiable evidence of projects, funding, completion rates, and measurable benefits arising from current interventions. Political headlines are not substitutes for records.

My conclusion is that Kashim Shettima is the more prepared and institutionally experienced of the two leaders. His academic background, professional training, service as commissioner in several ministries, eight years as governor, and experience in the Senate gave him a stronger foundation for national leadership. His record as vice president, although still incomplete, has larger effects on the nation and especially the people of the North-east than the eight-year period in which the North-east has no experience of the fingers of government.

* James Bwala, PhD, writes from Abuja

Atiku vs Shettima: Eight Years in the Vice Presidency Versus Less Than Four—Who Made the Bigger Impact?