News
Let Plateau breathe again: Governor Mutfwang confronts the painful truth about cattle rustling and violence
Let Plateau breathe again: Governor Mutfwang confronts the painful truth about cattle rustling and violence
By: Zagazola Makama
There are moments in the life of a troubled society when the most important thing a leader can do is speak a truth that many people would rather avoid. Not because the truth is convenient, popular or politically safe, but because refusing to confront it only allows more innocent people to die.
Governor Caleb Mutfwang’s recent warning against cattle rustling in Plateau State is one of those moments. His words were direct, uncomfortable and deserving of serious reflection: “You cannot rustle cows and bring death upon us. We will not accept it.”
That statement deserves to be heard beyond the political arena. It deserves to be discussed in villages, churches, mosques, community meetings, security formations and homes where parents are increasingly afraid of what the next day may bring.
For years, Plateau has been trapped in a cycle of violence, suspicion, reprisals and competing narratives. Communities have buried their loved ones, farmers have lost their livelihoods, pastoralists have watched their cattle disappear or die, and families on all sides have been forced to live with grief that no government statement can adequately heal.
Yet one painful reality has often been pushed to the margins of public discussion, the destruction of livelihoods, particularly through cattle rustling and attacks on livestock, has always become a trigger for deadly retaliation and a wider cycle of violence.
This does not excuse the killing of farmers in his farmland, the murder of civilians, attacks on villages or any other atrocity. It does not justify collective punishment or the targeting of an ethnic or religious community. It simply means that cattle rustling, where it occurs, must be recognised and confronted as a serious security and criminal justice problem, rather than dismissed as an incidental issue in a conflict that has already taken too many lives.
The cattle economy and the human cost of criminality
Zagazola Media Network has, over time, reported incidents and patterns involving the theft, killing and disappearance of livestock in parts of Plateau State. Our reports have drawn on incident accounts, photographs, videos and other material supplied to us.
Our records indicate that the scale of livestock losses reported by affected communities is substantial.
The issue cannot be reduced to an ethnic contest. A cow is not merely an animal to the person who owns it. For many pastoral families, livestock represents years of labour, accumulated savings, food, school fees, marriage arrangements and the security of an entire household. Losing dozens of cattle can mean losing the economic foundation of a family overnight.
Imagine a family that has spent generations building a herd, only to wake up one morning and discover that its animals have been stolen, maliciously poisoned or killed. Imagine the anger, helplessness and desperation that follow.
Now imagine that the loss is followed by threats, attacks and killings.
Also imagine investing in a farmland, spending millions of Naira then one Fulani herder will just come enter your farm and destroy everything. Leaving you with little or nothing.
That is how criminality can feed a wider conflict. A stolen animal can become the beginning of a reprisal. A destruction of farmland can become another trigger for revenge attack and the reprisal will then become an attack on a settlement. What you will continue to see an hear is another funeral, another displacement and another generation raised on bitterness.
This is the dangerous chain that Plateau must break. No community should be made to pay for the crimes of individuals. No farmer should be killed because of his identity. No pastoralist should be dispossessed because of his ethnicity. No family should be forced to flee its ancestral home because armed men have decided that violence is a legitimate means of settling disputes. The law must protect everyone, and the law must punish everyone who violates it.
A conflict that has been dangerously misdiagnosed
One of the greatest obstacles to peace in Plateau has been the tendency to explain the crisis through a single narrative while ignoring evidence that complicates that narrative. For too long, sections of public discourse have framed the violence almost exclusively through religious identity, often presenting every incident as proof of a systematic religious war against Christians. Claims have circulated that at-least 10 churches were being attacked on a daily basis and that Christians were routinely being killed inside their places of worship. Infact they will tell you that in Nigeria Christians were killed for killed for wearing the Cross. These are bunch of lies being told to the international communities. And that is why the complex conflict cannot be understood by turning every incident into evidence for a predetermined religious conclusion.
Plateau’s crisis involves multiple layers: criminality, cattle rustling, land and resource disputes, historical grievances, communal distrust, armed groups, revenge attacks, weak accountability and political manipulation. These factors interact, sometimes in ways that are difficult to separate. To insist that only one community suffers, or that only one side commits crimes, is to deny the pain of other innocent people. It also creates a climate in which perpetrators can hide behind the identity of their victims.
The question should not be whether a victim is Berom, Mwaghavul, Fulani, Christian or Muslim. The question should be: who committed the crime, what evidence exists, and what must be done to prevent another killing? That is the foundation of justice which the government have ignored for a long timeZ
There is a dangerous belief in some quarters that attacking the economic livelihood of a rival community is a legitimate strategy for forcing that community out of an area. That belief is not a strategy for peace. It is a recipe for permanent conflict.
If cattle are stolen to impoverish pastoralists, the result is not justice for farmers. If farms are destroyed to punish pastoralists, the result is not security for farming communities. If villages are attacked to avenge the death of a relative, the result is not protection for the bereaved family.
It is the multiplication of suffering. The Fulani are not a single armed organisation. The Berom are not a single militia. The Mwaghavul are not collectively responsible for every criminal act committed in their areas. Every community contains innocent people whose greatest desire is to live, work, raise their children and enjoy the ordinary dignity of a peaceful society.
Criminals must not be allowed to speak in the name of entire communities. Those who steal cattle, those who kill farmers, those who organise attacks, those who provide weapons and those who finance violence must be treated as individuals answerable for their actions.
And this is why Governor Mutfwang’s warning matters. He has publicly acknowledged that cattle rustling is not a harmless or isolated activity. It can bring death and insecurity to the wider population.
His appeal must now be translated into action: investigate livestock theft, trace stolen animals, dismantle criminal markets, recover weapons and prosecute offenders without ethnic or political protection. In many cases the Fulani’s who destroyed farmlands were forced to pay compensations but hardly will any fulani be compensated for any attacks or stolen livestock by either the community or the Plateau state government. Though some were done secretly for political reasons.
Perhaps even more disturbing is the growing language of confrontation attributed to some actors on both sides of the conflict.
Reports of speeches at funerals and religious gatherings that encourage people to defend themselves through armed mobilisation, or appeals for money to acquire weapons, should alarm every responsible citizen.
A funeral should be a place to mourn the dead, comfort the bereaved and pray for peace. It should not become a recruitment ground for another round of violence.
A church, mosque or community gathering should be a place where people are reminded of the value of human life. Religious leaders who use their influence to glorify revenge, promote hatred or encourage armed confrontation are betraying the very moral responsibility entrusted to them.
There is a difference between calling for protection and encouraging vengeance.
Communities have a right to demand security. They have a right to report attacks, insist on investigations and ask the government to protect them. But no community has the right to organise unlawful armed groups, target civilians or punish innocent people for crimes they did not commit.
When young people are taught that revenge is honour, that another ethnic group is an enemy, or that the acquisition of weapons is the answer to insecurity, the future is being sacrificed to the anger of the present.
The young men being drawn into these cycles are not the only ones who will pay. Their mothers will cry. Their children will grow up without fathers. Their communities will lose productive hands. Their neighbours will become enemies.
And those who encouraged them from a safe distance will often be nowhere to be found when the bullets begin to fly.
Operation Rainbow must protect, not deepen the crisis
The Plateau State Government’s deployment of additional Operation Rainbow personnel is intended to strengthen community protection and restore confidence. That objective is important, particularly in communities that have endured repeated attacks. But every security arrangement must be governed by clear rules, professional discipline, effective supervision and accountability.
Operation Rainbow must not become a partisan instrument or an extension of the grievances of any community. Its personnel must protect civilians without discrimination, respond to threats impartially and hand suspects over for lawful investigation and prosecution.
Any allegation of abuse, complicity, unlawful detention, extortion, ethnic profiling or participation in violence must be investigated promptly.
A community-based security outfit can help build confidence if it is trusted by all communities. But if it is perceived as serving one side, it risks deepening the very divisions it was established to address. The same standard must apply to every security agency operating in Plateau. No uniform, political connection, religious identity or community affiliation should provide immunity for criminal conduct.
The governor’s warning that even security personnel or community members involved in cattle rustling would be pursued is particularly important. Security cannot be restored when those entrusted with protecting the people are suspected of participating in the criminal economy.
Zagazola and the uncomfortable duty of reporting
At Zagazola Media Network, we have tried to report these developments as they emerge, including incidents involving livestock theft, attacks on communities and the consequences of reprisal violence. We have published reports supported by photographs, videos and accounts from affected people. We understand that some of these reports have made certain individuals uncomfortable. We have been accused of speaking for the Fulani, labelled in different ways and criticised for drawing attention to incidents that some would prefer to remain outside public discussion. But journalism cannot be reduced to the obligation to protect one narrative.
Reporting the suffering of innocent Fulani pastoralists does not mean endorsing violence against farmers. Reporting the killing of Berom civilians does not mean supporting attacks on Fulani settlements. Reporting cattle rustling does not mean excusing murder or collective punishment.
Our position is simple: no innocent person should be killed, displaced, dispossessed or dehumanised because of who they are.
The responsibility of journalism is to document, question, verify and expose. It is not to manufacture enemies or provide propaganda for those who profit from division. We also recognise that allegations, however disturbing, must be tested against evidence. The seriousness of the Plateau crisis demands responsible reporting, not exaggeration, selective outrage or unverified claims.
The dangerous temptation to wait for foreign intervention
There are also those who have increasingly looked towards foreign governments, particularly the United States and Israel, as though an external power can resolve the deep-seated grievances and criminal networks operating within Plateau. International attention can be useful. It can encourage accountability, humanitarian support and diplomatic pressure where necessary. But no foreign government can build lasting peace in Plateau on behalf of its people.
No American politician can reconcile neighbours who refuse to speak to one another. No foreign military can permanently resolve a local cattle theft dispute. No international statement can replace the work of investigating a murder, recovering stolen livestock, prosecuting an armed criminal or rebuilding trust between communities.
Foreign governments will pursue their own interests. Their statements may change with domestic politics, elections and strategic calculations. The people who will remain in Plateau after the international headlines disappear are the people who live there today.
They will still have to share roads, markets, schools, farms, water sources and neighbourhoods.
That is why the solution must begin at home.
Plateau must reject the politics of victimhood when it is used to excuse violence. It must reject propaganda that turns every disagreement into a religious war. It must reject leaders and influencers who inflame tensions while ordinary people bear the consequences. The people must also demand accountability from their own political, traditional, religious and community leaders. Nobody should be above criticism simply because they speak the language of a particular group.
There is no moral authority in condemning violence committed by another community while justifying violence committed by one’s own.
A leader cannot demand justice for victims from one side and remain silent when innocent people from another side are killed. A religious figure cannot preach compassion in public while encouraging hatred behind closed doors. A politician cannot call for peace during the day and mobilise ethnic resentment at night.
The same moral standard must apply to everyone.
If a Fulani pastoralist destroys farmlands, he must face the law. If a Berom or Mwaghavul individual steals cattle, he must face the law. If a herder kills a farmer, he must be prosecuted. If a farmer or militia member kills a pastoralist, he must also be prosecuted.
If a security operative facilitates cattle rustling, that operative must be investigated and punished. If a community leader finances armed violence, that leader must not be shielded by influence or identity. Justice that is selective is not justice. It is another form of provocation.
The state must not allow any individual or organisation to turn the suffering of Plateau people into a business, a political advantage or a platform for personal recognition.
The people who profit from the conflict are not necessarily the people who bury the dead.
Plateau is approaching a dangerous crossroad
The warning signs should not be ignored.
When communities begin to see one another as permanent enemies, when young people are mobilised around ethnic and religious hostility, when funerals become platforms for threats, when weapons are celebrated as symbols of courage and when every attack is answered with another attack, a state begins to lose the social foundations that hold it together. Plateau must not be allowed to become another prolonged theatre of war.
The North-East has shown Nigeria the terrible cost of allowing armed extremism, revenge, criminal economies and communal distrust to take root. Generations have been affected. Families have been displaced. Towns and villages have been destroyed. Enormous public resources have been spent trying to restore what violence took away.
Plateau still has an opportunity to prevent such a future. But that opportunity will disappear if those who preach hatred are allowed to dominate the public conversation. The state needs security operations, but it also needs justice. It needs arrests, but it also needs credible prosecutions. It needs community protection, but it also needs reconciliation. It needs political leadership, but it equally needs citizens who refuse to be manipulated. Above all, it needs an end to the criminal activities that keep supplying fresh reasons for retaliation.
Let Plateau breathe again
Governor Mutfwang’s words should become a standard against which every political leader, community leader, security operative, religious figure and citizen is judged.
When he says, “You cannot rustle cows and bring death upon us,” he is speaking to a reality that can no longer be ignored. But the message must go further.
You cannot kill a farmer and expect peace. You cannot steal a pastoralist’s cattle and expect him to feel secure. You cannot burn a home and expect its occupants to forget. You cannot murder innocent people and hide behind religion. You cannot encourage young men to take up arms and then pretend to be shocked when they return in body bags. You cannot demand justice for your own people while denying it to your neighbours.
Plateau does not belong to one ethnic group, one religion or one political interest. It belongs to all its people. Its future cannot be built by pushing one community out, impoverishing another or silencing those who have lost loved ones.
The farmer must be able to return to his farm without fear. The pastoralist must be able to move and protect his lawful livelihood without fear. Children must attend school without hearing gunshots. Traders must travel without being kidnapped. Families must sleep without wondering whose home will be attacked before dawn.
That is not too much to ask. It is the minimum obligation of a functioning society.
The people of Plateau must now make a choice: allow the merchants of hatred to determine their future, or reject them and reclaim their state.
Let the stolen cattle be recovered. Let the killers be arrested. Let the weapons be taken out of circulation. Let those who finance violence be exposed. Let every victim receive justice, regardless of identity. Let religious and traditional leaders become voices of restraint. Let security agencies protect all communities without fear or favour. And let the people stop rewarding those who turn their pain into propaganda.
The dead cannot return. But the living can still be saved.
Plateau has buried enough people. Its villages have endured enough fear. Its children have inherited enough bitterness. The next generation deserves something better than a conflict whose causes are repeatedly denied, manipulated or exploited. Let Plateau breathe again. Let its people choose life over revenge, justice over impunity, truth over propaganda and peace over the politics of endless bloodshed.
Zagazola is a Counter Insurgency Expert and Security Analysts in the Lake Chad Region
Let Plateau breathe again: Governor Mutfwang confronts the painful truth about cattle rustling and violence
News
EU, Nigeria Expand Cooperation on Migration, Security with €112m Support
EU, Nigeria Expand Cooperation on Migration, Security with €112m Support
By: Michael Mike
The European Union (EU) and Nigeria have reaffirmed their commitment to strengthening cooperation on migration management, security and regional stability, with the EU committing a combined €112 million to support migration-related and security initiatives in the country.
The commitment was highlighted during a visit by the European Commissioner for Internal Affairs and Migration, Mr Magnus Brunner, to Abuja on Tuesday, where he held high-level meetings with key Nigerian government officials.
Brunner met with the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu; Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Mr Lateef Fagbemi (SAN); Minister of Interior, Hon. Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo; and Minister of Humanitarian Affairs and Poverty Reduction, Dr Bernard Doro.
The EU said €66 million had recently been allocated to fund new migration-related projects, while another €26 million would support security interventions, including efforts to curb the proliferation of small arms and drug trafficking.
It also disclosed that it had adopted its first bilateral assistance measure to Nigeria under the European Peace Facility, committing €20 million to support the country’s counterterrorism efforts.
The development comes against the backdrop of growing cooperation between Nigeria and European institutions on migration management, particularly following the signing of the EU-Nigeria Readmission Agreement.
According to the EU, the partnership has recorded improvements in recent years through collaboration between Nigerian authorities and European agencies, including Europol, Eurojust and Frontex.
Brunner said the growing relationship reflected the importance Europe attached to Nigeria as a strategic partner in Africa.
“Nigeria is a key partner for Europe, and our ties are steadily growing stronger. Together we are turning dialogue into action: more security, better migration management, joining forces to bring results.
“We are turning the huge potential of our partnership into mutual benefit,” he said.
The EU said the visit also provided an opportunity to review the broader relationship between both sides, advance cooperation on shared priorities and explore areas of engagement beyond migration and security.
It noted that Nigeria and the EU shared a commitment to multilateralism and a rules-based international order, adding that their partnership had continued to expand in scope.
The relationship has gained further momentum following the eighth EU-Nigeria Ministerial Meeting held in Abuja in March, with the participation of the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Kaja Kallas.
The EU also highlighted the role of Team Europe, comprising the EU and its member states, in implementing its Global Gateway investment strategy in Nigeria through projects spanning several sectors.
It said Nigeria’s strategic position in West Africa and its wider regional influence made it an important partner in advancing regional economic cooperation, security, migration management and trade.
The commissioner’s visit is expected to further consolidate the partnership and lay the groundwork for deepe
EU, Nigeria Expand Cooperation on Migration, Security with €112m Support
News
DSS Intercept Weapons Shipment from Niger Republic, Recover 21 AK-47 Rifles, Four PKT Machine Guns in Sokoto
DSS Intercept Weapons Shipment from Niger Republic, Recover 21 AK-47 Rifles, Four PKT Machine Guns in Sokoto
By: Zagazola Makama
The Department Of State Security Service (DSS) have intercepted a large consignment of weapons and ammunition allegedly being smuggled from the Niger Republic to armed bandits operating in north-western Nigeria.
The interception, which took place on Tuesday, November 10, at Dawakawa in Goronyo Local Government Area of Sokoto State, followed a security operation targeting suspected weapons trafficking networks across the Nigeria-Niger border.
Security sources said the suspected smugglers were allegedly attempting to transport the weapons into Nigeria using camels, apparently exploiting remote routes and difficult terrain to evade security surveillance.
The operation led to the recovery of 21 AK-47 rifles, four PKT machine guns and 825 magazines.
The interception represents a significant disruption of an alleged cross-border weapons supply network suspected of facilitating the operations of armed bandit groups in the North-West.
The use of camels to transport the weapons highlights the increasingly unconventional methods employed by criminal networks to move arms and ammunition across porous border corridors.
The development also underscores the importance of sustained intelligence surveillance coordinated border security operations in preventing the movement of illicit weapons from neighbouring countries into Nigeria.
The recovered weapons are expected to provide security agencies with valuable leads towards identifying the suppliers, transporters and intended recipients of the consignment.
Zagazola report that several border communities along the Nigeria–Niger Republic frontier have emerged as vulnerable corridors for cross-border arms trafficking, bandit movements and other criminal activities, raising concerns over the security of Nigeria’s North-West.
The affected areas include Illela, Sabon Birni, Isa, Gudu and Tangaza in Sokoto State; Jibia, Kaita, Mai’Adua and Kongolam in Katsina; Zurmi and Shinkafi in Zamfara; as well as Kamba and Arewa Dandi in Kebbi State.
Security concerns around these border regions are linked to porous boundaries, informal trading networks and difficult-to-monitor rural terrain, which criminal networks like Bandits, Lakurawa and Boko Haram exploit for illicit activities.
The development reinforces the need for enhanced border surveillance, intelligence-sharing and coordinated operations to dismantle cross-border weapons supply networks.
Security agencies must also target the financiers and suppliers behind the trafficking networks rather than focusing solely on couriers.
DSS Intercept Weapons Shipment from Niger Republic, Recover 21 AK-47 Rifles, Four PKT Machine Guns in Sokoto
News
INEC Proposes Democratic Freedoms Compact to Safeguard 2027 Elections
INEC Proposes Democratic Freedoms Compact to Safeguard 2027 Elections
…NHRC warns of political intimidation, arbitrary arrests, hate speech; EU pledges support for protection of civic space
By: Michael Mike
The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has proposed a Democratic Freedoms Compact to safeguard fundamental human rights, protect civic space and strengthen public confidence ahead of the 2027 general election.
The proposed compact is designed to guarantee freedom of expression, association and political participation, promote inclusiveness, ensure electoral transparency and accountability, and prevent violence, intimidation and other human rights violations throughout the electoral process.
INEC Chairman, Prof. Joash Amupitan, SAN, unveiled the proposal in a keynote address delivered on his behalf by Dr Hassan Umar at the 2026 Civil Society and Human Rights Defenders Forum on the State of Human Rights in Abuja on Wednesday.
The forum, organised by the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) in collaboration with the European Union (EU), was themed, “Protecting Human Rights in Civic and Political Spaces in the 2027 Elections.”
Amupitan said the credibility of the 2027 elections would be determined not only by the conduct of voting and collation of results but also by the extent to which Nigerians could freely express their opinions, associate, campaign and participate in the political process without fear, discrimination or violence.
He warned that regular elections alone could not sustain democracy if citizens were denied the freedom to express dissenting views, organise, criticise government policies and hold public institutions accountable.
To address these concerns, the INEC chairman said the proposed compact would establish a framework for institutional conduct built around six critical commitments: protection of fundamental freedoms, inclusive participation, transparent elections, accountability for human rights violations, peaceful political competition and constructive engagement among stakeholders.
He called for stronger collaboration among INEC, the NHRC, security agencies, civil society organisations and the media to monitor, document and respond to violations before, during and after the elections.
Amupitan reaffirmed the commission’s commitment to conducting credible elections, ensuring equal treatment of political parties and candidates, strengthening transparency and promoting inclusive participation.
On the contentious issue of electronic transmission of election results, he maintained that the Electoral Act 2026 provided for electronic transmission, while INEC had developed guidelines to address possible technical and communication challenges.
He urged political parties, civil society organisations and other stakeholders to familiarise themselves with the commission’s guidelines and regulations to avoid misinterpretation of the procedures governing result transmission.
The INEC chairman also placed responsibility on security agencies to protect voters, candidates, election officials, observers and journalists, insisting that security personnel must operate professionally and impartially.
He said their presence at polling units and other electoral locations should reassure citizens and create a safe environment for participation rather than generate fear or intimidation.
Earlier, Executive Secretary of the NHRC, Chief Anthony Ojukwu, warned that Nigeria’s democratic space was facing mounting challenges that required urgent intervention as the country approached the 2027 general election.
Ojukwu identified political intimidation, arbitrary arrests, harassment of journalists and human rights defenders, hate speech, restrictions on civic participation and the exclusion of vulnerable groups as threats capable of undermining the credibility of the electoral process.
He said the commission convened the forum at a defining moment in Nigeria’s democratic journey, with the presidential and National Assembly elections scheduled for January 16, 2027, and governorship and State Houses of Assembly elections to follow on February 6.
According to him, the timing was particularly significant because political campaigns were already gathering momentum across the country, making the protection of civic and political freedoms increasingly urgent.
He stressed that democracy was not sustained by elections alone but by the freedom citizens enjoyed between elections to speak without fear, assemble peacefully, associate without obstruction and choose their leaders without intimidation.
Citing Sections 14, 39 and 40 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, Ojukwu said sovereignty belonged to the Nigerian people, while constitutional guarantees protected freedom of expression, association and peaceful assembly.
He also referenced the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, which guarantees citizens the right to participate freely in the governance of their country.
The NHRC boss expressed concern that civil society organisations, journalists and human rights defenders continued to operate in an increasingly difficult environment characterised by harassment, arbitrary arrests and the potential misuse of laws, including provisions of the Cybercrimes Act.
He further raised concerns over political and voter intimidation, exclusionary nomination fees that could prevent women, young people and persons with disabilities from contesting elections, hate speech, incitement and the apparent absence of accountability for electoral offences.
Ojukwu warned that failure to prosecute electoral offenders could encourage impunity and embolden perpetrators to undermine the electoral process.
He disclosed that the commission had established a comprehensive human rights monitoring architecture to track political developments and election-related violations as campaigns intensified.
The mechanisms include a Human Rights Situation Dashboard, a human rights advisory and an Election Situation Room designed to monitor intimidation, suppression of political participation, harassment of journalists and other oversight actors, as well as violations of fundamental freedoms.
He said the commission was finalising an advisory on protecting political space and the right to participation in Nigeria, describing it as a flagship contribution to strengthening human rights protection during the forthcoming elections.
The advisory follows earlier interventions by the commission, including its February 2025 advisory on the protection of freedom of expression, which raised concerns about the interpretation and possible misuse of the Cybercrimes Act.
Ojukwu also disclosed that the commission was documenting violations, preparing cases for investigation and engaging INEC, security agencies, the National Peace Committee and other relevant institutions to strengthen accountability.
He said the NHRC’s Election Situation Room would remain operational throughout the electoral period, while election-focused dashboards and bulletins would be published regularly to provide information on human rights developments.
The commission, he added, would deploy monitors to identified hotspots and establish legal aid partnerships to respond to violations during and after the elections.
He announced that the forum would be transformed into a structured platform for sustained engagement between the commission and civil society organisations, with quarterly meetings, early-warning information sharing and rapid-response mechanisms.
According to him, the arrangement would facilitate coordination between the NHRC’s Situation Room and the Civil Society Election Situation Room, strengthen protection for individuals targeted for exercising their rights and ensure that stakeholders are held accountable for their commitments.
He said the forum would also adopt an outcome statement containing recommendations and a roadmap to guide its activities before, during and after the 2027 elections.
Ojukwu urged civil society organisations and human rights defenders to take ownership of the proposed framework, stressing that they were not spectators in the electoral process but essential partners in defending democracy.
He also acknowledged legislative efforts to strengthen the commission’s mandate and improve the legal protection of human rights defenders, expressing optimism that the reforms would create a more enabling environment for their work.
The NHRC executive secretary maintained that election-related violations must attract consequences, warning that the absence of accountability would weaken public confidence and encourage further abuses.
He said: “When elections go without violence, it is because of the work done long before polling day. Work that is sometimes invisible to the public.”
He added that the protection of democracy required collective responsibility and sustained commitment from government institutions, political parties, security agencies, civil society and international partners.
Also speaking, the EU Ambassador and Head of Delegation to Nigeria and ECOWAS, Gautier Mignot, reaffirmed the European Union’s commitment to supporting Nigeria’s democratic institutions and protecting civic and political freedoms ahead of the 2027 general election.
Mignot described the forum’s theme as timely, particularly against the backdrop of reports of election-related violence, hate speech, political intimidation and restrictions on citizens’ fundamental rights.
He warned that such incidents could erode public trust in state institutions and discourage citizens from participating in the electoral process.
The ambassador said free civic and political spaces, including independent media, peaceful assemblies, public forums and civil society organisations, were essential to ensuring credible, transparent and inclusive elections.
According to him, these spaces enable citizens to access information, debate public issues, scrutinise candidates and hold elected leaders and public institutions accountable without fear of censorship or retaliation.
He added that an open civic environment also allowed civil society organisations and active citizens to monitor election administration, track campaign promises and challenge government interference in the democratic process.
Mignot said weakening these safeguards could undermine citizens’ right to meaningful political participation and create opportunities for the suppression of opposition voices and manipulation of democratic rules.
He therefore urged all Nigerian stakeholders, including government institutions, political parties, civil society organisations and the media, to play their respective roles in ensuring a free, fair and credible electoral process.
The EU ambassador disclosed that the partnership with the NHRC had continued since 2024, when the first joint engagement provided a platform for human rights defenders to assess the state of human rights in Nigeria and develop collective responses to challenges confronting them.
He said the second engagement, held as part of activities marking the NHRC’s 30th anniversary, focused on reviewing the country’s human rights record over three decades and identifying emerging challenges requiring sustained intervention.
Mignot described the current forum as a continuation of the strategic partnership, adding that the EU was also preparing a new project with additional funding to deepen its collaboration with the commission.
He pledged that the EU delegation would carefully examine the recommendations and roadmap emerging from the forum and share them with its authorities and member states for further consideration.
He assured Nigeria that the EU and its member states would remain reliable partners in supporting democracy, good governance and the protection of human rights during what he described as a crucial period for the country’s democratic development.
In a goodwill message delivered on behalf of the Chairman of the Inter-Party Advisory Council (IPAC), Alhaji Yusuf Dantale, Prince Chinedu Obi urged political parties and their supporters to embrace issue-based campaigns, political tolerance and responsible communication.
IPAC cautioned against electoral violence, hate speech, voter suppression and political intimidation, stressing that political opponents must be regarded as competitors rather than enemies.
The council also advocated greater inclusion of women, young people and persons with disabilities in the electoral process, while urging security agencies and other relevant institutions to discharge their responsibilities with professionalism and impartiality.
Dantale said public confidence in the electoral system would ultimately depend on whether institutions could guarantee that votes counted and that Nigerians were able to exercise their democratic rights freely.
The forum brought together representatives of government institutions, diplomatic missions, political parties, civil society organisations, the media and human rights groups to assess the state of human rights in Nigeria and develop practical strategies for protecting civic and political freedoms ahead of the 2027 general election.
INEC Proposes Democratic Freedoms Compact to Safeguard 2027 Elections
-
News3 years agoRoger Federer’s Shock as DNA Results Reveal Myla and Charlene Are Not His Biological Children
-
Opinions5 years agoTHE PLIGHT OF FARIDA
-
News2 years agoFAILED COUP IN BURKINA FASO: HOW TRAORÉ NARROWLY ESCAPED ASSASSINATION PLOT AMID FOREIGN INTERFERENCE CLAIMS
-
Opinions5 years agoPOLICE CHARGE ROOMS, A MINTING PRESS
-
News3 years agoEYN: Rev. Billi, Distortion of History, and The Living Tamarind Tree
-
ACADEMICS3 years agoA History of Biu” (2015) and The Lingering Bura-Pabir Question (1)
-
Columns3 years agoArmy University Biu: There is certain interest, but certainly not from Borno.
-
Politics1 year ago2027: Why Hon. Midala Balami Must Go, as Youths in Hawul and Asikira/Uba Federal Constituency Reject ₦500,000 as Sallah Gift
