Connect with us

News

NHRC Flags Implementation Gaps, Moves to Reset Human Rights Strategy

Published

on

NHRC Flags Implementation Gaps, Moves to Reset Human Rights Strategy

By: Michael Olugbode

The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) on Friday launched a comprehensive review of its 2024–2027 Strategic Plan, admitting that while significant progress has been made in expanding human rights protection across Nigeria, implementation gaps, weak monitoring systems and limited institutional capacity continue to hinder the full realization of its mandate.

The Commission said the mid-term assessment marks a decisive effort to recalibrate its strategy midway into the four-year plan, with a renewed focus on improving access to justice, strengthening accountability and enhancing protection for vulnerable and marginalized groups.

Opening a consultative stakeholders’ meeting on the presentation of the Mid-Term Review of the Strategic Plan in Abuja, the Executive Secretary of the Commission, Tony Ojukwu (SAN), described the exercise as a critical turning point in determining whether the Commission is delivering on its promises to Nigerians.

He said the review was not intended as a routine appraisal but as an opportunity to honestly assess achievements, confront implementation challenges and adopt practical measures that would strengthen the Commission’s performance over the remaining period of the strategic plan.

“The consultation offers an opportunity for constructive dialogue. Your contributions and recommendations will enrich the review findings and guide implementation during the remainder of the Strategic Plan,” Ojukwu told participants drawn from government institutions, development partners, civil society organisations, the diplomatic community and the media.

He explained that the NHRC Strategic Plan, which runs from 2024 to 2027, was designed as the Commission’s roadmap for building a stronger institution capable of delivering better services, expanding access to justice and protecting the rights of all Nigerians, especially those most vulnerable to abuse and discrimination.

According to him, the mid-term review showed encouraging institutional commitment, with all departments and units at the Commission’s headquarters as well as its offices in the 36 states actively participating in implementing the plan.

However, he acknowledged that the assessment also exposed areas requiring urgent attention.

Among the key concerns identified are the need to strengthen implementation mechanisms, improve monitoring and reporting systems, build institutional capacity and ensure more efficient use of limited resources.

Ojukwu said addressing these shortcomings would be critical to improving the Commission’s effectiveness and ensuring that its interventions produce measurable results for citizens.

He noted that the findings of the review provide a strong foundation for repositioning the Commission to respond more effectively to Nigeria’s evolving human rights challenges.

The Executive Secretary also praised the commitment of staff, state coordinators and partners whose contributions made the review possible, urging stakeholders to use the consultation to provide frank recommendations that would shape the next phase of implementation.

The review comes at a time when concerns over human rights, access to justice and the protection of vulnerable populations remain central to national discourse, with increasing calls for stronger institutions capable of responding to emerging challenges.

The review, which assessed implementation from January 2024 to December 2025, found that all 36 state offices and 20 headquarters departments and units participated in the exercise, collectively recording 90,627 implementation outputs against 160 validated performance indicators. State offices accounted for 48,980 outputs, representing 54 per cent of the total, while headquarters contributed 41,647 outputs, or 46 per cent, underscoring broad institutional participation in implementing the Commission’s strategic agenda.

According to the report, the Commission recorded its strongest performance in the areas of protecting vulnerable populations and promoting human rights education and awareness. These two strategic priorities alone accounted for nearly three-quarters of all implementation outputs, reflecting the Commission’s sustained focus on safeguarding vulnerable groups, expanding public awareness of human rights and improving access to justice across the country. Other areas, including economic, social and cultural rights, access to justice and treaty reporting, posted moderate achievements, while specialized areas such as research, resource mobilisation and knowledge management were identified as requiring greater attention during the remaining implementation period.

The evaluation also highlighted disparities in implementation across state offices and headquarters departments, attributing the variations largely to differences in operational mandates, programme portfolios and institutional capacity rather than organisational effectiveness. It recommended targeted resource allocation to lower-performing strategic priorities, stronger monitoring and evaluation systems, improved data quality assurance, continuous capacity building for state offices and the institutionalisation of periodic management dashboards to support evidence-based decision-making.

The consultative meeting is expected to validate the review findings and produce recommendations that will guide the Commission’s work through the final phase of its 2024–2027 Strategic Plan, as it seeks to deepen public confidence and strengthen the protection of human rights across the country.

NHRC Flags Implementation Gaps, Moves to Reset Human Rights Strategy

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

‎NSCDC Arrests, Detains 24 Personnel in Conn election with Death of 37 Alleged Miners in Custody

Published

on

‎NSCDC Arrests, Detains 24 Personnel in Conn election with Death of 37 Alleged Miners in Custody

By: Michael Mike

‎As Nigeria mourns the unfortunate death of 33 suspected illegal miners in Niger State, Commandant General of the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC), Professor Ahmed Audi has given assurance that due process, transparency and accountability will be strictly followed in the investigation of 24 personnel of the Corps currently held in custody of the NSCDC, adding that every single personnel found culpable will face the full weight of internal disciplinary measures and the law.

‎As against the initial figure of 21 personnel, the Corps Public Relations Officer, Babawale Afolabi, while parading the officers and men at the Corps Headquarters disclosed that three more personnel identified have also been placed on suspension thereby bringing the number of personnel detained in relations to the death to 24 personnel.

‎The Spokesman explained,
‎ “in a swift and decisive joint operation conducted in conjunction with the Commandant General’s Special Investigation Squad (SIS) all officers and men of the Niger State Command linked to the gross misconduct have since  on the 17th September 2026 been  taken into protective  custody at the National Headquarters, Abuja, where they are undergoing rigorous interrogation and administrative disciplinary action, so as to make them available for the Presidential Independent Investigation Committee and other investigation panels for further investigation and possible prosecution.”

‎According to him, in solemn demonstration of our grief, institutional remorse, and absolute disapproval of this incident, the Commandant General has ordered that the NSCDC flag be flown at half-mast across all formations for three days, starting from Sunday , 20th September, 2926 to signal our collective mourning and our unwavering resolve to purge the system of bad eggs.

‎The PRO quoted the Commandant General who said, “as a Corps built on integrity, professionalism, discipline, and absolute respect for the rule of law, we do not condone unprofessional conduct, high-handedness, or any action that undermines the fundamental rights of citizens or the sacred trust reposed in us.”

‎He pledged on behalf of the service to continue to keep the public abreast on the outcome of the investigation, adding that the leadership of the NSCDC remains unwavering in its commitment to transparency, human rights protection, and professional ethics.

‎In furtherance, he appreciated the patience and understanding of Nigerians during the internal re-evaluation.

‎Names of the officers held in the custody in connection with the event as:

‎1. Commandant Subaru Siyaka Aniviye (SN: 3465) – suspended NSCDC Niger State Commandant

‎2.DCC. Ajayi Philips (SN: 19546) – HOD Intelligence and Investigation *(Remark: Lack of supervision)

‎3. DCC. John Agrahau Chagwa (SN: 1571)  HOD Operations Remark: lack of supervision

‎4. DCC. Obafemi Elvis (SN: 26234)

‎5. ACC. Stephen Tsado (SN: 19057) – O/C Legal

‎6. CSC. Oluwadare Sunday (SN: 12648)

‎7. CSC. Annas Shittu Lamino (SN: 28882)

‎8. SC. Usman Isah Ndamaka (SN: 70016)

‎9. DSC. Aminu Sule Garba (SN: 66281)

‎10. DSC. Musa Marafa (SN: 66580)

‎11. DSC. Isah Sulaiman (SN: 44377)

‎12. ASCI. Hassan Muhammad (SN: 56218)

‎13. ASCI. Alhassan Muhammad (SN: 14232)

‎14. Aliyu Sallah (SN: 67130) – Guard Duty

‎15. IC. Abdullahi Sale (SN: 41683) –

‎16. IC. Mohammed N. Sonfada (SN: 74351)

‎17. Mohammed Jiya

‎18. Sale Adamu (SN: 46400) –

‎19. Haruna Muhammed (SN: 52659)

‎20. CCA. Baba Muhamma (SN:44273)

‎21. CAI. Isah Sanusi (SN: 78586)

‎22. CAI. Liman Abubakar (SN: 72017)

‎23. CAI. Bala Usman (SN: 76178)

‎24. CAI. Ahmed Wushishi (SN: 70502)

‎NSCDC Arrests, Detains 24 Personnel in Conn election with Death of 37 Alleged Miners in Custody


Continue Reading

News

Group Demands Probe into Death of Nigerian Academic in South Africa

Published

on

Group Demands Probe into Death of Nigerian Academic in South Africa

By: Michael Mike

Speak Out for Justice Advocacy Ltd/Gte (SOJA) has called for a full, independent and transparent investigation into the death of a 51-year-old Nigerian academic, Dr Ayodele Temidayo Odularu, who was reportedly found dead at her residence in South Africa’s Eastern Cape Province on August 16.

The rights advocacy organisation made the demand in a statement issued on Sunday by its Founder and Executive Director, Hameed Ajibola Jimoh, amid concerns raised by Odularu’s family over the circumstances surrounding her death.

Odularu, a Nigerian academic and researcher associated with the University of Fort Hare, was reportedly found dead at her residence, with the university subsequently holding a memorial service in her honour.

While SOJA stressed that no competent authority had publicly established the cause or manner of her death, it said the uncertainty surrounding the circumstances made a credible investigation imperative.

The organisation cautioned against prematurely describing the death as murder, an attack or an act of xenophobic violence, insisting that such conclusions must be based on evidence.

However, SOJA argued that the absence of an established cause of death should not become a reason for the case to be closed without exhaustive investigation.

“An investigation must therefore neither manufacture a crime where none occurred nor dismiss a possible crime as a natural death without proper evidence,” the organisation said.

SOJA urged the South African Police Service, prosecutorial authorities, medico-legal officials and other relevant institutions to establish the precise medical cause of death and reconstruct the circumstances leading to Odularu’s death.

It specifically called for scrutiny of events at her residence before she was found dead, the circumstances in which she was last seen alive, and any evidence of forced entry, struggle, injury, poisoning, assault or other suspicious circumstances.

The organisation also demanded the preservation and examination of potentially crucial evidence, including CCTV footage, telephone records and electronic communications, as well as a proper post-mortem examination and toxicological or other forensic analyses where necessary.

It further urged investigators to establish whether anyone who had access to Odularu, communicated with her or visited her shortly before her death could provide information relevant to the investigation.

SOJA’s intervention comes against the backdrop of recurring concerns over the safety of Nigerians and other African nationals in South Africa, but the organisation said the broader context should not be used to predetermine the cause of Odularu’s death.

According to the group, investigators must examine all reasonable possibilities, including criminality, discrimination, xenophobic hostility, interpersonal conflict, accident and medical causes.

“Dr Odularu was a Nigerian citizen, but she was also a human being living and working within the jurisdiction of South Africa. Her nationality could never lawfully reduce the protection owed to her life, dignity and physical security,” SOJA said.

The organisation cited South Africa’s constitutional protection of the right to life and human dignity, as well as its obligations under international human-rights instruments, including the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

It also referred to South Africa’s Inquests Act 58 of 1959, which provides for inquests into deaths apparently resulting from causes other than natural causes.

SOJA maintained that the legal framework should be allowed to operate without interference where questions arise over whether a death was natural, accidental, suicidal, homicidal or otherwise unlawfully caused.

The organisation also turned its attention to the Nigerian government, urging the Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Nigeria’s diplomatic mission in South Africa to engage directly with Odularu’s family and establish the status of the investigation.

It called for appropriate consular assistance, regular communication with the family and diplomatic engagement where credible evidence eventually establishes that the death was connected to a crime, discrimination, xenophobic violence or other unlawful conduct.

“The Nigerian Government should not wait until public outrage subsides before seeking answers concerning the death of a Nigerian citizen abroad,” SOJA said.

The group also demanded that Odularu’s remains be treated with dignity and that her family be provided with appropriate information on the investigation, subject to lawful investigative restrictions.

It said any person found criminally responsible should face prosecution, while evidence of negligence or institutional failure should trigger appropriate accountability and corrective measures.

Conversely, SOJA said, if credible medical and investigative evidence establishes that the death was natural or accidental, that conclusion should be communicated on the basis of those findings.

The organisation stressed that the objective should not be to satisfy public curiosity but to establish the truth and ensure justice and accountability.

“Dr Ayodele Temidayo Odularu was not merely a statistic in an international news report. She was a daughter, sister, aunt, colleague, mentor, researcher and member of the Nigerian community whose life had value and whose death deserves a truthful account,” SOJA said.

It urged authorities to ensure that the circumstances surrounding her death do not remain unresolved, demanding “truth for the family, justice for Dr Ayodele Temidayo Odularu and accountability where wrongdoing is established.”

SOJA also called for stronger protection for Nigerians and other African nationals living and working in South Africa, stressing that nationality should never diminish the protection accorded to human life.

Group Demands Probe into Death of Nigerian Academic in South Africa

Continue Reading

News

THE NIGERIA POLICE: AN INSTITUTION OF SERIOUS CONCERN

Published

on

THE NIGERIA POLICE: AN INSTITUTION OF SERIOUS CONCERN

A Nine-Year Search For Truth . JUNE 2017 – JULY 2026 – AND STILL UNRESOLVED

By: Mrs Nnenna John-Anozie

Following my husband’s abduction in 2017, the police officers completely cut off every means of access to him. I could neither see him nor hear from him,and despite repeated efforts to establish his whereabouts and ensure his well being and safety, I was denied access to him. The police also failed to charge him before a court with any offence. Faced with the authorities refusal to disclose his whereabouts,their denial of access to him ,and their failure to produce him before a court ,I was left with no option but to institute an action for the enforcement of his fundamental rights at the High Court of Anambra State ,Idemili Judicial Division,Holden at Ogidi, being Suit No.HID/MISC. 47/2017, filed on 3 July 2017 before HIS LORDSHIP HON. JUSTICE .V.N.AGBATA.

On 24 July 2017,the Honourable Court presided over by His Lordship, Hon.Justice V.N. Agbata made an order directing as follows:
(a) That the Police are hereby ordered to charge my husband to court if a prima case is made against him or release him on bail.
(b) In the alternative,the Police are ordered to produce him in court on the next adjourned date of this suit and show cause why he can not be charged to court or released on bail.
Suit was adjourned to 19 September 2017 .
The Police did not comply,instead they subsequently put forward the claim that my husband had died.

Because this was never accompanied by the production of his body or any satisfactory account of his death,I returned to court and filed a motion on 20 October 2017,and prayed for an order of court compelling the police to produce his corpse for the purposes of a joint autopsy by the Government Doctor and Doctor chosen by his family,and thereafter ,for the police to release the said corpse to his family for a proper and decent burial .

On 16 April 2018, the court ordered the police to release the corpse to the members of his family for a burial since he was not charged and convicted of any offence.

Regrettably,however ,that order,too was not complied with.

Thus began a long and painful pattern: court orders were made,petitions were submitted ,investigations were initiated,and yet the fundamental question remained unanswered –

What happened to Chukwuemaka John Anozie ?

Upon realizing that nothing will come out of the matter in Anambra State,having made several efforts that proved abortive.I went to Force Headquarters Abuja and petitioned the Inspector General of Police seeking his intervention and thorough investigation to unravel the truth about my husband’s whereabouts and what happened to him?

What the Police Investigation Revealed

Following the petition to the IGP,an investigation was constituted and conducted by the X-Squad Unit at Force Headquarters .

That investigation produced findings and identified Sergeant Emeana Uzochukwu and Anthony Obiozor Ikechukwu as principal suspects in connection with the enforced disappearance of my husband.

Following the investigation,the Legal Department at Force Headquarters prepared a legal advise and charges, with the approval of the then DIG ,Force Criminal Investigation Department (FCID),Anthony Michael Ogbizi,in 2020.

Yet,despite these investigative findings,the officers identified in connection with my husband’s abduction and enforced disappearance were not charged or prosecuted.

There was another deeply troubling discovery .

A few days after my husband’s abduction,withdrawals began to be made from his bank account using his ATM card.The withdrawals continued until the account was completely depleted.

In other words,while my husband remained missing, our family properties had been taken,two vehicles had been removed from our home,a briefcase containing money ,important family documents, certificates and international passports had been taken,and money had been withdrawn from his bank account until the account was completely depleted

And for years ,even the case file containing the records of the investigation into his disappearance could not be accounted for.

It was not until July 2026, nine years after his disappearance ,that the case file was finally brought out and reportedly forwarded to the Attorney General of the Federation.

Yet,despite the investigation,the identification of suspects,the existence of court orders,preparation of charges and legal advise, no prosecution had taken place.

SEEKING JUSTICE : My Visit To The National Human Rights Commission And The End SARS Judicial Panel Proceedings in Abuja.

On 9 Oct 2020, I visited the NHRC in Abuja and met with the Chairman ,Mr Tony Ojukwu SAN. I narrated my ordeal to him and also lodged my petition with the commission.

After my visit,the End SARS protests subsequently commenced and led to the constitution of a panel of inquiry by the Federal Government to address related human rights violations.

Between 2020 and 2022, I appeared before the End SARS Judicial Panel of Inquiry in Abuja, hoping that the panel would finally provide a forum through which the truth about my husband’s disappearance could emerge.

The panel issued several orders directing the police to ensure the appearance of officers who were respondents in the proceedings and who had been implicated in my husband’s enforced disappearance .

They repeatedly failed to appear .

The proceedings were adjourned repeatedly -no fewer than twelve times over the course of two years .

The police failed to summon the officers ,and none of them appeared before the panel throughout the proceedings .

The panel also issued directives requiring my husband to be produced or an explanation to be given concerning his whereabouts. Those directives were not complied with.

The Panel further ordered Mr.Ochogwu, then CP Legal ,to personally appear and ensure the production of my husband’s case file and other documents relating to the investigation. The Panel reiterated this order on five separate occasions during the adjourned sittings, yet that order was not complied with .

Eventually,after two years of proceedings ,the panel concluded its work without resolving the central questions surrounding my husband’s disappearance .

Actions Taken After the Panel’s Closure To Continue My Quest For Justice.

With the matter still unresolved ,another petition was submitted to the Office of the Inspector General of Police on 22 November,2023 through Falana and Falana Chambers .

Following that petition,the Office of the Inspector General, directed that the matter be reopened for further investigation ,not only into my husband’s abduction and disappearance involving officers of the Nigeria Police Force ,but also into the disappearance of the case file from the Legal Department .

The matter was subsequently reassigned to Mr.Chinedu of the IGP Monitoring Team for further investigation.
Again,however,requests for relevant documents and investigative records were not complied with, and the matter once more went dormant.
I again wrote a letter through my lawyer Vincent Adodo, dated 8th April 2025, to the Inspector General of Police,requesting, pursuant to the Freedom of information Act 2011,the release of the case file and reports of several investigations concerning my husband’s disappearance ,both to me and to the Attorney General of the Federation.
The Inspector General of Police Kayode Egbetokun refused to release the requested documents.
This refusal persisted despite the fact that investigations had already been conducted ,a legal advise and charges had been prepared, and a subsequent judgment of the Federal High Court ordered the release of the relevant documents.

I was therefore left with no option but to return to court.

The Federal High Court Judgment

I subsequently instituted Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/865/2025 Nnenna Anozie v. Inspector General of Police, before the Federal High Court ,Abuja seeking among other reliefs,an order of Mandamus compelling the IGP to release the certified true copies of the investigation records and legal advise concerning my husband’s abduction and disappearance .

The suit was heard before Hon. Justice Binta Nyako.
In the suit , I also sought an order directing that the indicted officers be handed over to the Attorney General of the Federation for prosecution before the appropriate court..

Despite being served with the court processes and hearing notices,the police failed to appear to defend the case.

On September 24,2025 ,Hon. Justice Binta Nyako of the Federal High Court,Abuja delivered judgment in Suit No.FHC/ABJ/CS/865/2025 in my favour, granting the reliefs sought and awarding ₦2Million in compensation for the violation of my right to information .

At that point ,I believed that after eight years of struggle,the judgment would finally open the door to accountability and access to the records concerning my husband’s disappearance

I was Wrong

Despite being served with the judgment and the relevant orders ,the Inspector General of Police did not comply.

Following the continued non-compliance by the police under the then IGP Kayode Egbetokun, my lawyer caused Form 48-Notice of Consequences of Disobedience to Court Order and Form 49-Notice of Committal to the Correctional Centre to be issued and served on the IGP.

Notwithstanding the judgment of the Court,and steps taken to enforce it ,the order remained unimplemented until the removal of the then Inspector-General of police from office on 24 February 2026.

Following the appointment of the present Inspector-General of Police Olatunji Rilwan Disu, contempt proceedings were initiated in respect of the continued non-compliance with the judgment.

Then,on July 24, 2026, during subsequent court proceedings ,I was informed by my lawyer that the police had filed a Notice of Compliance stating that my husband’s case file and related documents had finally been forwarded to the Attorney-General of the Federation.

After nine years, the case file had finally moved.

But my husband is still missing and his whereabouts remain unknown.

The File may have moved ,But Justice has not.

The Police’s stated forwarding of the case file to the Attorney General of the Federation has not brought this matter to a resolution .

The Office of the Attorney General of the Federation has,to date ,taken no action on the cases file reportedly forwarded to it.
I have therefore been placed in the extraordinary position of having to pursue a case concerning my missing husband while being denied access to the very investigative records generated in that case.
And so,after nine years of petitions ,investigations, court orders,panel proceedings ,legal representations and litigation ,the questions with which this journey began remain the same:

The passage of time has not diminished the pain,it has deepened it.

Emeana Uzochukwu and Anthony Obiozor Ikechukwu owe me, my children, our families, and the Nigerian public answers about Chukwuemeka John Anozie’s whereabouts and what happened to him, and must be brought forth to provide answers.

I want my children to have answers about their father.

They have grown up without the presence of their father and without the certainty of knowing what happened to him

The Nigeria Police Force bears responsibility for accounting for the investigation into my husband’s enforced disappearance, the handling and custody of the case file, the actions and omissions of its officers following his disappearance .

The rule of law must be upheld ,and the law must take its course

Mrs Nnenna John-Anozie

THE NIGERIA POLICE: AN INSTITUTION OF SERIOUS CONCERN

Continue Reading

Trending

Verified by MonsterInsights