National News
NHRC Insists Violation of Human Rights by Military in the Northeast must be Punished
NHRC Insists Violation of Human Rights by Military in the Northeast must be Punished
… Compensations Paid to Victims
By: Michael Mike
The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) has said Nigerians must not lose sight of the fact that significant human rights violations did occur in the ongoing military counter-insurgency operation in the Northeast which calls for punishment for perpetrators and compensation to victims.
Speaking in Abuja at the opening of the Civil-Military Forum on the Recommendations and Findings of the Special Independent Investigative Panel on Human Rights Violations in Counter-Insurgency Operations in North-East Nigeria, the Chairman of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), Dr. Salamatu Husseini Suleiman insisted that that the military was not found involved in the forced abortion of over 10,000 pregnant women in the crisis torn Northeast region as reported by Reuters did not mean it never violated human rights of the people of the area.
Suleiman, who was represented by another member of the NHRC board, Kemi Asiwaju-Okenyodo noted that the purpose of the forum was to foster an open and constructive dialogue between the Nigerian Armed Forces, the National Human Rights Commission, and key stakeholders, and
work toward implementing the findings and recommendations of the Special Independent Investigative Panel (SIIP) on Human Rights Violations in Counter-Insurgency Operations in North-East Nigeria.
She also noted that: “The findings of the SIIP North-East, which were guided by a commitment to thorough investigation, impartiality, and transparency, have brought to light serious concerns regarding the conduct of military operations in the region. These concerns include, but are not limited to, the killing of civilians in Abisari, Borno State, and allegations of forced and illegal abortions and other grave violations.
“While some of the most serious allegations, including systematic abuses, were not substantiated by the panel’s investigation, we must not lose sight of the fact that significant human rights violations did occur. The killing of civilians in Abisari remains a grave violation that demands justice, accountability, and immediate action.”
She insisted that: “These are not abstract issues. These are real lives, real families, and real communities whose suffering must be acknowledged and addressed, “ adding that: “The recommendations of the panel provide a roadmap for addressing these violations, holding perpetrators accountable, and ensuring that similar violations do not occur in the future.”
Among the panel’s key recommendations are include Compensation for the victims of the Abisari killings with the Federal Government ensuring that the families and communities affected are provided adequate reparations; the prosecution of those responsible for these heinous acts through a Court Martial and the referral of retired officers for prosecution by the Attorney General of the Federation; Reforms aimed at strengthening accountability mechanisms within the military, including improved training on human rights and the development of standards for military engagement that prioritize civilian protection.
She said: “As we discuss these recommendations today, let us remember that the ultimate goal is not just to address past wrongs, but to ensure a future where the Nigerian military conducts its operations with full respect for human rights. We must work toward a military that is not only capable in its fight against insurgency but also committed to protecting the dignity and rights of every Nigerian, particularly those in conflict zones.”
She added that: “As we embark on these discussions, I urge all of us here today to reflect deeply on the findings and recommendations, and to think about the practical steps we can take to move from dialogue to action. We must be prepared to implement reforms, hold individuals accountable for violations, and build a culture of respect for human rights within the military.”
Suleiman noted that: “Together, we can ensure that justice is done, that victims are compensated, and that we pave the way for a future where human rights are safeguarded in all aspects of our military operations.”
The Executive Secretary of the Commission, Dr. Tony Ojukwu, on his part, explained that in the light of the findings by the panel, “this forum serves as a platform for us to engage in meaningful dialogue and explore ways to address these concerns. Our primary goal is to bring together the Nigerian military and the NHRC — to collectively reflect on these findings and discuss practical steps for the implementation of the panel’s recommendations.”
He said: “At the NHRC, we believe that upholding human rights is not just the responsibility of the government or human rights organizations; it is a shared duty among all of us. As the National Human Rights Commission, we are committed to promoting human dignity, ensuring accountability, and strengthening the rule of law. This forum will help guide our collective efforts toward ensuring that such violations are addressed, and that we build a military that respects the rights and dignity of all civilians in conflict zones.”
He noted that: “issues we are addressing today are not only about past violations but about ensuring that we create a future where human rights are central to the operations of the Nigerian Armed Forces. This will require commitment, transparency, and the willingness to learn and grow from our past experiences.
“I am confident that the discussions and decisions that will take place today will contribute to the reforms needed to ensure greater accountability within the military and to establish stronger protections for civilians in the North-East and other conflict areas of the country.”
NHRC Insists Violation of Human Rights by Military in the Northeast must be Punished
National News
Jungle Justice Is Murder, Not Justice — IGP Disu Orders Nationwide Crackdown on Mob Killings
Jungle Justice Is Murder, Not Justice — IGP Disu Orders Nationwide Crackdown on Mob Killings
By Zagazola Makama
The Inspector-General of Police, IGP Olatunji Rilwan Disu, has declared a firm war against jungle justice and mob action across Nigeria, directing Commissioners of Police in the 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory to treat every case of mob violence as homicide and investigate such incidents with the same seriousness accorded other killings.
Disu, in a strong-worded public address, on Sunday said no Nigerian, community, vigilante group or association had the legal authority to arrest, try, convict or execute another person on the basis of suspicion, accusation, rumour or social media evidence.
The IGP’s declaration comes amid renewed public concern over cases in which suspected criminals are subjected to beatings, burning, stabbing and other forms of extrajudicial punishment before security agencies can intervene.
He said the Police Force would no longer regard such incidents as mere community disputes or spontaneous public reactions, but as serious criminal offences requiring full investigation and prosecution.
“Jungle justice is murder. It is not justice. It is a crime, and the Nigeria Police Force will treat it as such,” Disu said.
The police chief stressed that Nigeria operates under the rule of law and not mob rule, warning that no citizen or group has the constitutional authority to determine the guilt of another person or impose punishment outside a competent court.
‘Nobody has the right to take another person’s life’
According to the IGP, Sections 33, 34 and 36 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, guarantee fundamental rights including the right to life, dignity and fair hearing.
He said those rights remain applicable even when a person is suspected of committing a serious crime.
Disu argued that the growing practice of gathering around an alleged criminal, beating the person and sometimes killing him or her before the police arrive represents a direct assault on the country’s justice system.
He said an accusation does not amount to proof of guilt. A person shouting “thief”, a viral video, a photograph circulated online or an allegation made by a member of the public, he maintained, cannot replace a police investigation or judicial determination.
“The law presumes everybody innocent until proven guilty in a court of law, not in the street, not by a mob, not by a phone video because you saw him in video,” he said.
The IGP cited the March 2025 killing of 16 travellers in Uromi, Edo State, as a painful reminder of the consequences of mob justice.
The victims, who were reportedly travelling from Rivers State towards Kano, were intercepted after local security personnel found locally made weapons in their vehicle. The situation escalated after they were suspected of being kidnappers, resulting in the mob attack that claimed 16 lives. Police subsequently arrested suspects in connection with the incident.
The incident generated nationwide outrage and renewed calls for stronger action against mob killings. Amnesty International also called for a transparent investigation into the Uromi killings, describing the incident as a brutal lynching.
The IGP said Nigeria had witnessed several disturbing cases in which individuals were killed over allegations that were either unverified or subsequently found to be mistaken.
He referenced cases involving students accused of stealing phones, travellers mistaken for criminals, and young people attacked over allegations of blasphemy or ritual activities.
Such cases, he said, demonstrate the deadly consequences of allowing rumours and accusations to substitute for evidence.
The warning is particularly significant in an era where videos and allegations can spread rapidly across social media platforms.
A short video clip can be shared thousands of times within minutes, while an accusation attached to it can quickly become accepted as fact before investigators establish what actually happened.
Disu made clear that the police investigation would not stop with the individual who physically killed the victim.
He directed police commands to identify and prosecute ringleaders, instigators and other participants whose actions contributed to the mob violence, where the evidence supports criminal liability.
The IGP said investigators would use video recordings, eyewitness accounts, community intelligence and forensic evidence to reconstruct incidents and identify those involved.
The implication is that the traditional excuse of “I did not touch him” may not necessarily shield a person whose conduct amounts to criminal participation. Those who plan, incite, encourage or facilitate mob action may face investigation for conspiracy or other offences, depending on the facts and applicable law.
In one of the strongest elements of his warning, the IGP also addressed people who record mob attacks on their phones.
He said filming incidents, circulating the videos, mobilising crowds or preventing security personnel from rescuing a suspect could attract criminal consequences where such conduct amounts to an offence.
The warning is significant because videos of mob killings have increasingly become part of the evidence available to investigators.
Rather than helping perpetrators escape, such recordings can potentially provide investigators with a trail of evidence showing who was present, who attacked the victim, who encouraged the crowd and who prevented intervention.
The IGP therefore warned Nigerians against assuming that remaining behind a camera automatically removes them from criminal responsibility.
Police officers who look away will also face consequences. Disu’s directive was not directed exclusively at civilians.
He also placed responsibility on police officers who fail to intervene when mob action is taking place.
The IGP warned that officers who stand by, look away or fail to take reasonable action to protect a suspect from a violent crowd could face disciplinary measures.
This aspect of the directive is particularly important because the responsibility to protect life remains central to policing. A suspect may eventually be convicted. A suspect may eventually be acquitted. But while the investigation and trial are ongoing, the state remains responsible for protecting that person’s life and dignity.
Disu therefore told officers that protecting life was not an optional responsibility attached to wearing the police uniform.
‘Take suspected criminals to the police’
The IGP appealed to Nigerians to redirect their anger and frustration through lawful channels.
He urged anyone who suspects another person of committing a crime to immediately alert the police or the nearest security agency rather than attempting to punish the suspect.
He also called on community leaders, religious leaders, market associations and other influential groups to use their platforms to discourage mob violence.
According to him, community vigilance should complement law enforcement, not replace it.
A responsible community member, he said, should help the police identify a suspected criminal, preserve evidence and provide information—not become judge, jury and executioner.
The IGP’s intervention comes at a time when public frustration over insecurity, criminality and delays in the justice system can easily translate into demands for immediate punishment.
In many communities, jungle justice is sometimes rationalised as a response to the belief that criminals will escape justice if handed over to the authorities. But the police chief rejected that logic.
He acknowledged the frustration created by crime and the slow pace of justice but maintained that the answer to institutional weakness is reform and stronger enforcement, not extrajudicial killing.
A society cannot simultaneously demand respect for the rule of law while allowing crowds to determine who deserves to live or die.
Disu’s declaration is strong, but its ultimate impact will depend on enforcement.
The police will have to demonstrate that cases of mob justice can be investigated with the same determination applied to other homicide cases.
Investigators will have to identify suspects from often chaotic scenes, preserve digital evidence, obtain witness statements, establish individual culpability and work with prosecutors to build cases capable of surviving judicial scrutiny.
There is also the question of police response.
Where officers arrive early enough to prevent a mob killing, their intervention can mean the difference between a criminal investigation and a homicide investigation. Where officers fail to act, the IGP’s promise of disciplinary action will therefore be closely watched.
Perhaps the most important message from the IGP is that criminal responsibility does not necessarily begin only when the fatal blow is delivered.
It can begin with the decision to mobilise the crowd. It can begin with incitement. It can involve preventing the police from taking custody of a suspect. It can involve encouraging the attackers.
And, depending on the evidence and the law applicable to the particular conduct, it can extend to other forms of participation in the offence. The police are therefore drawing a new line around mob violence:
If you suspect someone, report them.
If you have evidence, submit it. If the person is arrested, allow the law to take its course.
But if a crowd gathers and turns an accusation into a death sentence, the people involved should not expect the law to describe the killing as “community justice.” It will be investigated as a crime.
The central message of IGP Disu’s declaration is ultimately about the kind of country Nigeria wants to be. One system of justice cannot operate in the courtroom while another operates on the street. The court must remain the place where guilt is established.
The police must remain the institution responsible for investigating crime. Citizens must remain witnesses, complainants and partners in crime prevention not executioners.
And communities must understand that protecting themselves from criminals does not require them to become criminals themselves.
The Uromi killings demonstrated the catastrophic consequences of allowing suspicion to become collective punishment. The IGP’s latest directive is an attempt to ensure that such incidents are neither normalised nor dismissed as spontaneous expressions of public anger.
The message from the police chief is therefore unequivocal: Jungle justice is not justice.
Mob action is not a court. A viral video is not a conviction. An accusation is not a death sentence.
And where a mob takes a person’s life, the police will treat the incident not as justice served, but as a crime to be investigated and prosecuted.
Jungle Justice Is Murder, Not Justice — IGP Disu Orders Nationwide Crackdown on Mob Killings
National News
NHRC Boss Honoured for Victim-Centred Human Rights Push
NHRC Boss Honoured for Victim-Centred Human Rights Push
…UTA rewards Ojukwu for compensation, restorative justice, empowerment of rights-abuse victims
By: Michael Mike
The Executive Secretary of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), Chief Tony Ojukwu, has been honoured with the 2026 UTA International Humanitarian Award for championing a victim-centred approach to human rights protection, including compensation, economic empowerment and restorative justice for victims of violations.
The United Towns Agency for North-South Cooperation (UTA), Nigeria Chapter, presented the award to Ojukwu in Abuja on Thursday as part of activities marking World Humanitarian Day 2026.
The recognition, according to UTA, was in acknowledgement of Ojukwu’s sustained efforts to promote human dignity, expand access to justice and protect vulnerable and marginalised Nigerians.
Rather than limiting the response to documenting violations, the interventions highlighted by UTA focused on helping victims recover and rebuild their lives through economic empowerment, compensation and restorative support.
The initiatives also include transitional and restorative justice programmes in the North-East and efforts to improve access to justice for poor and marginalised persons.
The recognition comes against the backdrop of Nigeria’s continuing humanitarian and human rights challenges arising from conflict, displacement, poverty and other forms of vulnerability.
Under Ojukwu’s leadership, the NHRC has increasingly positioned victims at the centre of its interventions, pursuing not only accountability for violations but also remedies, restoration and practical support for affected persons.
Receiving the award, Ojukwu described it as both an honour and a fresh call to humanitarian service.
“As a humanitarian myself, this award has stimulated me to do more,” he said.
He stressed the importance of placing victims, dignity and justice at the heart of human rights protection, particularly in a country facing complex humanitarian challenges.
UTA described the NHRC chief’s interventions as contributing to the advancement of human dignity and the protection of vulnerable populations.
The organisation is a United Nations-affiliated non-governmental organisation with consultative status with the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC).
The award ceremony attracted government officials, diplomats, humanitarian actors and other stakeholders.
The Vice President, Senator Kashim Shettima, was represented by the Director-General of the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA), Hajiya Zubaida Abubakar Umar.
Also present were representatives of the Zamfara State Governor; the Comptroller-General of the Nigeria Customs Service, Adewale Adeniyi; the Minister of Humanitarian Affairs and Poverty Alleviation, Bernard Doro; members of the diplomatic corps; UTA International Global Secretary-General, Dr. (Amb.) Eya Essif; and UTA-Nigeria Country President, Amb. Princess Abigail Amalaha.
The honour effectively places renewed attention on the humanitarian dimension of human rights protection in Nigeria, particularly the need to move from responding to violations to ensuring that victims receive justice, restitution and the means to regain sustainable livelihoods.
NHRC Boss Honoured for Victim-Centred Human Rights Push
National News
FG Declares Tuesday Holiday for Eid-ul-Mawlid, Charges Nigerians on Peace, Unity
FG Declares Tuesday Holiday for Eid-ul-Mawlid, Charges Nigerians on Peace, Unity
By: Michael Mike
The Federal Government has declared Tuesday, August 25, 2026, a public holiday to mark the 2026 Eid-ul-Mawlid, the anniversary of the birth of Prophet Muhammad, with the government urging Nigerians to turn the religious celebration into a renewed commitment to peace, unity and national cohesion.
The Minister of Interior, Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo, announced the declaration on behalf of the Federal Government in a statement issued on Friday by the ministry’s Permanent Secretary, Dr Magdalene Ajani.
The declaration gives Muslim faithful across the country a day to commemorate the occasion, while the minister urged Nigerians to look beyond the festivities and draw practical lessons from the life and teachings of Prophet Muhammad.
Tunji-Ojo identified compassion, humility and service to humanity as some of the values associated with the Prophet’s life, saying they were particularly relevant to Nigeria’s current quest for peace and national development.
“Every Eid ul Mawlid gives us reason to pause and draw lessons from a life defined by compassion, humility and service to others.
“These are qualities our nation needs now more than ever, and I encourage every Nigerian, not just our Muslim brothers and sisters, to reflect on them,” he said.
The minister called on Nigerians to use the occasion to pray for peace, unity and national cohesion, stressing that the responsibility for building and sustaining a peaceful nation rested on all citizens.
He also urged Muslim faithful and other Nigerians to celebrate responsibly, with restraint, mutual respect and consideration for people of different faiths and backgrounds.
According to him, the values of peaceful coexistence and respect for one another remained essential to strengthening the bonds that hold the country together.
Tunji-Ojo congratulated Muslims in Nigeria and across the diaspora on the celebration and wished them a peaceful and joyous Eid-ul-Mawlid.
He further reaffirmed the commitment of the President Bola Tinubu administration to protecting lives and property and promoting peace and stability across the country.
The minister urged citizens to support government and community efforts aimed at strengthening national unity, fostering peaceful coexistence and building a more stable and prosperous Nigeria.
The public holiday will therefore provide Muslim faithful with an opportunity to mark the religious occasion while joining other Nigerians in reflecting on the values of tolerance, compassion, service and peaceful coexistence highlighted by the Federal Government.
FG Declares Tuesday Holiday for Eid-ul-Mawlid, Charges Nigerians on Peace, Unity
-
News2 years agoRoger Federer’s Shock as DNA Results Reveal Myla and Charlene Are Not His Biological Children
-
Opinions5 years agoTHE PLIGHT OF FARIDA
-
News1 year agoFAILED COUP IN BURKINA FASO: HOW TRAORÉ NARROWLY ESCAPED ASSASSINATION PLOT AMID FOREIGN INTERFERENCE CLAIMS
-
News2 years agoEYN: Rev. Billi, Distortion of History, and The Living Tamarind Tree
-
Opinions5 years agoPOLICE CHARGE ROOMS, A MINTING PRESS
-
ACADEMICS2 years agoA History of Biu” (2015) and The Lingering Bura-Pabir Question (1)
-
Columns2 years agoArmy University Biu: There is certain interest, but certainly not from Borno.
-
Politics1 year ago2027: Why Hon. Midala Balami Must Go, as Youths in Hawul and Asikira/Uba Federal Constituency Reject ₦500,000 as Sallah Gift
