Connect with us

News

NIGCOMSAT Fires Back: No Manipulation in NIGCOMSAT-2A, 2B Deal

Published

on

NIGCOMSAT Fires Back: No Manipulation in NIGCOMSAT-2A, 2B Deal

By: Michael Mike

Satellite firm challenges bid-rigging claims, says BPP rules guided multi-billion-naira procurement

The Nigerian Communications Satellite Limited (NIGCOMSAT) has thrown out allegations of manipulation in the procurement of the NIGCOMSAT-2A and NIGCOMSAT-2B satellites, declaring that the multi-billion-naira exercise was subjected to uniform technical, financial, security and compliance scrutiny in line with public procurement rules.

The satellite operator, in a detailed response to a September 18 report by Daily Post, rejected suggestions that the procurement was structured to favour particular bidders, describing the publication as a combination of “unverified assertions and selective accounts” that could give a false impression of a compromised process.

NIGCOMSAT’s defence comes amid scrutiny of the procurement of the two satellites, which the company described as a critical component of Nigeria’s digital infrastructure and communications security architecture.

The company insisted that no bidder was given preferential treatment, stressing that every participant was assessed against the same requirements under applicable procurement laws, guidelines and procedures of the Bureau of Public Procurement (BPP).

It said the successful bidders were not selected on the basis of a single technical or financial criterion but emerged from an overall assessment covering technical responsiveness, financial compliance, delivery capacity, project risks, security considerations and long-term value to the Federal Government.

“The successful bidders emerged from that overall assessment, not from the preference or influence of any individual or interest group,” NIGCOMSAT said.

The company also rejected an apparent argument that a bidder’s previous contractual relationship with NIGCOMSAT or performance under an earlier contract should have translated into an automatic advantage in the new competition.

According to the satellite firm, previous participation in government contracts does not confer an entitlement to future awards, adding that failure to win a fresh competitive procurement could not, on its own, constitute evidence of manipulation.

NIGCOMSAT maintained that each procurement exercise must be judged on its own evaluation criteria and the evidence presented by competing bidders.

The company said interpreting the non-selection of a previous contractor as proof of wrongdoing would undermine the principle of competitive procurement.

It further pushed back against issues raised about the administration of the organisation, revealing that its current management inherited a salary structure that had remained unchanged for 17 years.

NIGCOMSAT said it had initiated steps to review the structure through the relevant government approval channels.

It also disclosed that management was working to resolve outstanding obligations associated with official assignments while tightening internal procedures governing authorisation and reimbursement.

A significant part of NIGCOMSAT’s response centred on the selection of Hughes Network Systems’ JUPITER platform, with the company rejecting what it called speculative conclusions drawn from reported Chapter 11 proceedings involving Hughes Satellite Systems.

NIGCOMSAT said the report did not demonstrate that the proceedings had impaired Hughes Network Systems’ technical capacity, contractual obligations or ability to deliver the ground infrastructure required under the satellite programme.

It argued that the financial or corporate circumstances of a related entity could not automatically be transferred to the specific company involved in the procurement without evidence establishing an impact on its ability to perform the contract.

“A reported corporate or financial development involving a related entity does not, on its own, establish that NIGCOMSAT’s procurement decision was defective,” the company said.

NIGCOMSAT said any assessment of the deal should instead be based on technical evaluation, contractual due diligence and verified evidence.

The satellite company challenged any bidder or interested party with substantive objections to the procurement to invoke the statutory mechanisms provided for procurement reviews.

Rather than using media reports to challenge the outcome, it urged parties with legitimate grievances to pursue the formal channels established under the procurement framework.

NIGCOMSAT, however, acknowledged the media’s role in scrutinising public institutions and government expenditure, saying such scrutiny remained important in a democracy.

But it insisted that reporting on sensitive public procurements should be grounded in accuracy, balance and a proper understanding of the processes involved.

Beyond the controversy, NIGCOMSAT said the NIGCOMSAT-2A and NIGCOMSAT-2B programme was designed to strengthen Nigeria’s strategic communications infrastructure.

The company said the satellites would help improve communications resilience and extend broadband services to underserved communities while supporting national security, education, healthcare, broadcasting and other sectors of the economy.

Given the strategic and financial implications of the project, NIGCOMSAT said it had incorporated technical, financial, legal and project-continuity safeguards into the procurement and implementation framework.

The company consequently stood by both the integrity of the procurement process and its outcome, declaring that external pressure and commercial interests would not be allowed to compromise the project.

Its response effectively shifts the focus of the controversy from allegations of procurement manipulation to the documentary evidence underpinning the evaluation, award and due-diligence processes for a satellite programme expected to play a significant role in Nigeria’s digital and communications infrastructure.

NIGCOMSAT Fires Back: No Manipulation in NIGCOMSAT-2A, 2B Deal

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Nigeria, India Sign Landmark Human Rights Pact, Fagbemi Backs Stronger Institutional Independence

Published

on

Nigeria, India Sign Landmark Human Rights Pact, Fagbemi Backs Stronger Institutional Independence

…AGF pledges justice ministry’s support for implementation, demands practical safeguards for citizens in AI era

By: Michael Mike

Nigeria and India have signed a bilateral agreement to strengthen human rights protection, institutional capacity and access to justice, with the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Prince Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, pledging the Federal Government’s support for its implementation.

Fagbemi, who described the agreement as a strategic partnership between the two countries, said its success would ultimately be measured by its impact on ordinary citizens, particularly vulnerable and marginalised groups seeking justice.

The agreement, executed between the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) of Nigeria and its Indian counterpart, is designed to deepen institutional cooperation, facilitate knowledge transfer, promote technical exchanges and strengthen operational capacity in addressing human rights violations.

The Attorney-General gave the government’s position on Tuesday in Abuja when he received a joint delegation of the two commissions at the Federal Ministry of Justice, describing the partnership as timely, particularly in an increasingly interconnected world where effective human rights protection requires stronger legal frameworks, institutional collaboration and respect for the rule of law.

The development followed a high-level engagement between the two commissions and the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), at the Supreme Court Complex, Abuja, on Monday, as part of a two-day working visit by the Indian delegation.

The Nigerian delegation was led by the Executive Secretary of NHRC, Chief Tony Ojukwu, SAN, OFR, while the Indian delegation was headed by the Chairperson of India’s NHRC, Justice V. Ramasubramanian, accompanied by the Commission’s Joint Secretary, Mr. Samir Kumar.

Fagbemi said the partnership brought together two major democracies with shared common-law traditions, diverse populations and dynamic constitutional frameworks, expressing satisfaction with the thematic areas identified for cooperation under the agreement.

He specifically highlighted access to justice and the protection of digital rights as critical areas requiring urgent attention, particularly as emerging technologies, including Artificial Intelligence, continue to reshape society and create new human rights concerns.

According to him, both countries must develop legal safeguards to protect data privacy, prevent algorithmic bias and safeguard civic space, while ensuring that technological advancement does not undermine fundamental freedoms.

He said the Ministry of Justice expected the two commissions to produce actionable research and policy recommendations capable of addressing these emerging challenges.

Beyond emerging technologies, the Attorney-General stressed that Nigeria’s commitment to human rights must be reflected in the practical implementation of constitutional guarantees and international obligations, rather than merely in the existence of legal provisions.

He cited the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, which Nigeria domesticated through the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act, Cap. A9, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004, as a major instrument underpinning the country’s human rights jurisprudence.

The Charter provides important protections relating to non-discrimination, human dignity, fair trial and personal liberty, reinforcing the fundamental rights guaranteed under Nigeria’s Constitution.

Fagbemi maintained that the true measure of a country’s commitment to human rights was its ability to translate constitutional provisions into accessible institutions, accountable public authorities and an independent judiciary.

He assured the Indian delegation that the Federal Ministry of Justice fully supported the bilateral initiative and was prepared to facilitate technical engagements, joint legal reviews and policy consultations aimed at improving the efficiency of the justice sector.

The Attorney-General also used the engagement to reaffirm the institutional independence of Nigeria’s National Human Rights Commission, stressing that its autonomy was essential to its credibility and effectiveness.

He specifically drew attention to Section 6(3) of the National Human Rights Commission (Amendment) Act, 2010, which provides that the Commission, in exercising its statutory functions, shall not be subject to the direction or control of any other authority or person.

According to him, the administration has continued to respect and protect the Commission’s statutory independence, describing it as fundamental to institutional integrity.

He further noted that the relationship between the NHRC and the Federal Ministry of Justice had been characterised by constructive institutional synergy, mutual respect and a shared commitment to advancing human rights.

The Attorney-General commended Ojukwu and the Nigerian commission for spearheading the bilateral initiative, while expressing appreciation to the Indian delegation for bringing its expertise and institutional experience to the partnership.

Earlier, during Monday’s engagement with the Chief Justice of Nigeria, the Executive Secretary of NHRC Nigeria had emphasised the complementary responsibilities of the judiciary and national human rights institutions in protecting fundamental freedoms, upholding the rule of law and ensuring access to justice.

Ojukwu identified complaint management, Alternative Dispute Resolution, security sector accountability, comparative legal research, digital rights, Artificial Intelligence ethics and environmental justice as priority areas for cooperation between both countries.

The Chief Justice reaffirmed the commitment of the Nigerian Judiciary to human rights protection and encouraged both commissions to exchange experiences and adopt best practices, particularly in strengthening safeguards for vulnerable groups, including women, children and persons with disabilities.

The Indian delegation described the engagement as significant to relations between the two countries, noting that the MoU represented a first-of-its-kind institutional partnership for India’s National Human Rights Commission.

The agreement is expected to promote sustained institutional exchanges, strengthen complaint-handling mechanisms, improve professional capacity and encourage comparative research into legal and policy approaches to human rights protection.

The partnership also comes at a time when national human rights institutions face increasing demands to address abuses linked to security operations, discrimination, environmental degradation, digital surveillance and the misuse of emerging technologies.

For Nigeria, the collaboration offers an opportunity to strengthen its human rights enforcement architecture through international knowledge-sharing while reinforcing the independence and operational effectiveness of its national commission.

Fagbemi, however, cautioned that the ultimate benchmark of the agreement must go beyond official engagements and institutional exchanges to deliver tangible improvements in the lives of citizens, especially those most vulnerable to violations and denied access to justice.

He wished the Indian delegation a productive stay in Nigeria and expressed confidence that the partnership would advance the shared commitment of both countries to human dignity, justice and the protection of fundamental rights.

Nigeria, India Sign Landmark Human Rights Pact, Fagbemi Backs Stronger Institutional Independence

Continue Reading

News

NSCDC Strengthens Gender Policy Implementation, Trains Officers on SGBV, Digital Safety

Published

on

NSCDC Strengthens Gender Policy Implementation, Trains Officers on SGBV, Digital Safety

By: Michael Mike

Corps partners SPRING, FCDO, TechHer to promote women’s participation in peacebuilding, tackle technology-facilitated violence

The Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) has intensified efforts to combat sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV), strengthen women’s participation in security decision-making and promote digital safety among young people through the implementation of its Gender Policy II.

The Commandant-General of the Corps, Prof. Ahmed Audi, stated this at a two-day Gender, Women, Peace and Security capacity-building training organised at the NSCDC College and Support Staff Service, Udege, Nasarawa State.

The training was organised in collaboration with Strengthening Peace and Resilience in Nigeria (SPRING), with support from the United Kingdom’s Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO).

Audi, who delivered his keynote address through a representative, said the policy provided a framework for mainstreaming gender considerations into the Corps’ operations, personnel management, leadership structure and community engagement.

He stressed the need for effective prevention and response to sexual and gender-based violence, including conflict-related abuses and technology-facilitated violence.

The Commandant-General also called for increased participation of women in peacebuilding and security decision-making, equal opportunities within the Corps and stronger partnerships with traditional institutions, government agencies, civil society organisations and development partners.

He urged commands and personnel, particularly Gender Desk Officers, to ensure effective coordination, timely reporting, appropriate referrals, monitoring and accountability in handling gender-related cases.

Audi described the implementation of the policy as a collective responsibility requiring sustained commitment across all levels of the Corps.

In a goodwill message, the Osu Ajiri of Edege Chiefdom, Alhaji Suleiman Ahmed Eko IV, commended the NSCDC for its presence in the community, saying its operations had strengthened the sense of security among residents, particularly farmers.

The traditional ruler pledged the support of his council in addressing gender-based violence, describing the protection of the community as a priority.

Earlier, the Commander of the College, ACG Jamilu Indabawa, said collaboration among relevant stakeholders was critical to achieving effective implementation of the gender policy.

The Gender Equality, Diversity and Social Inclusion Lead of SPRING, Mrs Amina Akano-Bello, said the training was designed to promote peaceful and resilient communities through early identification and response to gender-based violence, as well as the inclusion of women and young people in leadership.

Also, the NSCDC National Headquarters Gender Unit Adviser, DCC Ajet Kemi, provided participants with insights into the different forms of sexual and gender-based violence, their societal implications and preventive measures.

A retired Assistant Commandant-General, Ahmed Abodurin, who facilitated a session on institutional ethics in gender policy implementation, emphasised professionalism, accountability, gender sensitivity and adherence to institutional standards.

Beyond the capacity-building exercise, the Corps partnered TechHer, an organisation promoting women’s advancement through technology, to extend digital safety awareness to schools in Udege.

The outreach, themed “Stop Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence”, educated students on the dangers of digital abuse, responsible online behaviour and measures for staying safe in digital spaces.

Representatives of the Federal Ministry of Interior, Nasarawa State Ministry of Women Affairs and Social Development, Nasarawa State Ministry of Justice and Gammuo International also delivered goodwill messages, reaffirming the importance of collective action in advancing gender equality, peace and security.

NSCDC Strengthens Gender Policy Implementation, Trains Officers on SGBV, Digital Safety

Continue Reading

News

Bank customer alleges N2.59m theft from two GTBank accounts

Published

on

Bank customer alleges N2.59m theft from two GTBank accounts

By: Michael Mike

A customer of Guaranty Trust Bank, Stella Adepegba, has accused the bank of negligence after fraudsters allegedly stole N2.59m from two accounts belonging to her and her daughter within 24 days.

Adepegba said the incidents occurred on October 8 and November 1, 2026, with the perpetrators allegedly transferring funds without authorisation or security notifications.

She accused the bank of failing to refund the money despite repeated complaints and assurances that the matter would be resolved.

According to her, the first incident involved her daughter, Victoria Adepegba, whose Child Saver’s Account was allegedly compromised on October 8 at about 8pm.

She explained that N2.507m was transferred through the Nigeria Inter-Bank Settlement System Instant Payment channel in four transactions, leaving less than N2,000 in the account.

Adepegba said N399,000, N398,000 and N220,000 were transferred to a Moniepoint account bearing the name Abdulmalik Idris, while another N1.49m went to a GoMoney account bearing the name Zainab Ibrahim.

She alleged that no debit alerts were received, adding that a GTBank employee informed her of the transactions and offered to block the account after the money had already been withdrawn.

The complainant said she reported the incident at the bank’s Kubwa branch in Abuja on October 9 and was instructed to document the unauthorised transactions.

However, she alleged that the bank subsequently sent an email attributing the transactions to compromised login credentials, an explanation she rejected.

Adepegba said another N80,000 was fraudulently transferred from her personal GTBank account on November 1 to a FairMoney account bearing the name Jamilu Ahmad, bringing the cumulative loss to N2.587m.

“GTB could not explain how the hackers successfully stole my money despite changing my account’s log-in details after the attack on my daughter’s account. The bank must refund the stolen funds and go after those who masterminded the fraud,” she said.

She insisted that her mobile phone, SIM card and ATM card were in her possession during both incidents, adding that she neither disclosed her banking credentials nor received OTP requests.

“The implication of these targeted attacks on my bank accounts is that no customer’s funds are safe with GTB, and if anything happens, the bank will not accept responsibility or offer any succour whatsoever,” she lamented.

She stated that a compliance officer, Innocent Ukatu, and the bank’s media consultant, Cornelius Onuoha, initially assured her that the complaint would be resolved.

Reacting to the incident, the Chief Communications Officer of Guaranty Trust Holding Company Plc, Mrs Oyinade Adegite, said the incidents had been investigated and feedback provided to the customer.

She attributed the compromise to customer-side security vulnerabilities, explaining that fraudsters increasingly deploy sophisticated phishing techniques to obtain banking credentials.

“Immediately this came up, it was escalated and investigated, and feedback has been given,” she said.

Adegite explained that customers could unknowingly compromise their accounts by clicking malicious links that install malware that can capture sensitive information.

“Now it’s a phishing link you might click on that sometimes would actually install malware on your phone,” she said.

She maintained that the bank had implemented the necessary security safeguards, including two-factor authentication, and insisted the compromise originated on the customer’s end.

“All the measures the bank has to put in place for us, 2FA, everything was done. So, the compromise came clearly from the customer,” she stated.

However, she expressed sympathy for the losses and said she would follow up on the second incident to explore possible intervention.

The allegations come amid regulatory scrutiny of Nigerian banks over consumer protection and compliance failures.

An earlier analysis of audited financial statements showed that Guaranty Trust Holding Company, GTBank’s parent company, incurred N383.65m in regulatory penalties in Nigeria in 2024.

The sanctions included N56m for consumer protection violations, N160.4m following a Central Bank of Nigeria mystery shopping exercise, N149.25m for compliance-related issues and bank email returns, and N18m following a foreign exchange examination.

Bank customer alleges N2.59m theft from two GTBank accounts

Continue Reading

Trending

Verified by MonsterInsights