News
Nigeria Reaffirms Commitment to Regional Agricultural Integration
Nigeria Reaffirms Commitment to Regional Agricultural Integration
By: Michael Mike
Nigeria’s Minister of Agriculture and Food Security, Senator Abubakar Kyari, has called for stronger regional coordination to boost agricultural productivity, enhance trade, and protect the environment across West Africa.
He made the call in Abuja on Wednesday at the opening of the ECOWAS Initiative on Economic Integration through Trade, Environment and Agriculture—an interlinked series of policy dialogues convened by the ECOWAS Commission.
The meetings brought together the Directorates of Trade, Environment and Agriculture, along with ministers, development partners and technical experts from across the region.
Kyari noted that the engagements are crucial for shaping the policies and systems that determine the economic trajectory of West Africa.
He stressed that agriculture, trade and environmental management must be treated as one interconnected system, noting that agricultural goods constitute a significant portion of West Africa’s intra-regional trade but remain vulnerable to climate shocks, land degradation and water scarcity.
He said: “With agriculture driving regional trade and the environment sustaining our productivity, none of these sectors can function in isolation,” urging member states to strengthen mechanisms that support farmers and deepen market integration.
Kyari highlighted ongoing efforts at both regional and continental levels to promote predictable, rules-based trade, referencing the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) and the ECOWAS Trade Liberalisation Scheme (ETLS) as vital tools for expanding market access.
He also reaffirmed the importance of the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP) and ECOWAS’ own agricultural blueprint, ECOWAP, which has guided regional planning since 2005. Both frameworks, he said, align with the African Union’s Agenda 2063 vision for food security and economic transformation.
Nigeria, he added, has established its Agriculture Sector Working Group to coordinate national agricultural development under the Post-Malabo CAADP commitments and ahead of the Kampala Declaration (2026–2035). The platform brings together government agencies, researchers, private sector players, farmer organisations, civil society groups, and development partners to harmonise planning and track accountability.
The Minister while reflecting on his personal history with the regional bloc, recalled serving 25 years ago on the Nigerian team that helped set up the ECOWAS Parliament, where he became the body’s first Questor. He described Nigeria’s role in hosting the Parliament as a point of national pride and a symbol of the country’s enduring commitment to regional integration.
He noted that Nigeria is pursuing comprehensive reforms through the National Agricultural Technology and Innovation Policy (NATIP), which links technology, farmer support, market efficiencies and institutional changes under one framework. As NATIP approaches its midterm review, Nigeria is working to align it with upcoming regional commitments under the Kampala Declaration.
This week’s ECOWAS sessions are expected to address issues central to food production, including fertilizer quality control, soil health interventions, and a regional fertilizer market strategy. The technical follow-up meetings on ECOWAP implementation will continue into early December.
Kyari described fertilizer as the “single most expensive but most impactful input” for African farmers, warning that poor quality fertilizer or high prices directly threaten regional food output. He underscored the need for harmonized standards and stronger quality enforcement across West Africa.
He also disclosed that Nigeria recently launched the Nigerian Farmers Soil Health Scheme, which provides soil-specific nutrient guides, enhances fertilizer use efficiency, and establishes a national soil-health data platform. The initiative is expected to strengthen domestic food production and support regional coordination.
He noted that agriculture contributes more than 25 percent of Nigeria’s GDP and remains the country’s largest employer, Kyari noted. He argued that strengthening Nigeria’s agricultural sector inevitably boosts food resilience and market opportunities across the region.
The minister reiterated President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s commitment to making food security a central pillar of Nigeria’s national agenda, adding that the administration’s focus aligns with ECOWAS’ broader goal of a self-sufficient and economically integrated West Africa.
Kyari emphasized that achieving the region’s aspirations will require active participation from farmers, pastoralists, youth, women, private sector players, researchers and civil society groups. He urged member states to intensify policy coordination, upgrade standards and expand knowledge-sharing.
“West Africa’s strength will be defined by the strength of its collaboration,” he said, pledging Nigeria’s continued commitment to shared regional goals.
He expressed hope that the Abuja engagements would help translate regional ambitions into functional systems capable of driving sustainable growth across the ECOWAS space.
Also, the Federal Government has expressed its readiness to support the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) Regional Action Plan to confront poor plastic waste disposal in the subregion.
Nigeria’s Minister of Environment, Balarabe Lawal, gave the promise at the opening ceremony of the validation of the ECOWAS Regional Action Plan on plastic management and the ECOWAS initiative towards economic integration through trade, environment and agriculture.
He said poor plastic waste disposal is posing major risks to food security in the ECOWAS sub-region.

Lawal said: “Across the ECOWAS sub-region, it has been estimated that over 2 million tonnes of plastic waste are generated annually, with a significant percentage ending up in waterways, drainage channels, ocean bodies or open dumps,” the minister said, adding that this poses major risks to food security, climate resilience, public health and economic livelihoods.
“The validation of this Regional Action Plan, therefore, provides us with a harmonised framework for: Transitioning to sustainable plastic production and consumption systems; Strengthening Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) mechanisms; Advancing circular economy value chains; Promoting regional standards, monitoring and compliance systems; and Supporting research, innovation and green job creation,” he said.

The Minister while acknowledging that the ECOWAS is championing an integrated approach that ensures trade policies, agricultural systems, environmental standards, and industrialisation, pledged that “Nigeria fully aligns with the objectives of this regional action plan.”
He said the Federal Ministry of Environment continues to strengthen national policies and regulatory frameworks, saying, “We remain committed to working collaboratively with all ECOWAS Member States to harmonise regional standards, promote knowledge exchange, and build capacity for effective implementation.”
Speaking at the opening ceremony of the meeting, the Vice President of the ECOWAS Commission, Mrs Damtien Tchintchibidja, referencing the 2024 FAO State of Food Security Report, said that 12% of the West African population is food insecure.
“The causes can be attributed to adverse effects of climate change, poor functioning of regional markets, policy incoherence, and restrictive trade policies, as well as conflicts,” she said, adding that the ECOWAS is committed to advancing regional strategies that promote renewable energy, sustainable land use, and resilience against climate shocks.

She said the ECOWAS Commission, through its Department of Economic Affairs and Agriculture, is implementing a portfolio of strategic projects aimed at strengthening industrial development, promoting trade, boosting agricultural productivity, improving food and nutritional security, and accelerating inclusive economic growth in all member states.
“These initiatives aim to give operational content to ECOWAS Vision 2050 and the broader objectives of the African Union’s Agenda 2063.”
She said, “Agriculture remains the backbone of our economies, employing millions and ensuring food security. Guided by the ECOWAS Agricultural Policy (ECOWAP), our interventions aim to modernize production, strengthen value chains, and promote agribusiness that is inclusive and competitive.
“Furthermore, we are advancing the West Africa Fertilizer and Soil Health initiatives, which are critical for improving productivity, restoring degraded lands, and ensuring sustainable food systems.
“By investing in soil health and fertiliser access, we are laying the foundation for resilient agriculture that can feed our people and create jobs for our youth and women,” she said.
Nigeria Reaffirms Commitment to Regional Agricultural Integration
News
Troops repel bandits’ attack in AgatuBenue
Troops repel bandits’ attack in Agatu
Benue
By Zagazola Makama
Troops of the Nigerian Army, in collaboration with the police, repelled an attack by suspected armed bandits on a joint patrol team in Agatu Local Government Area of Benue State.
Security sources said the incident occurred at about 9:00 a.m. on April 4, when the troops on routine patrol encountered the armed bandits.
According to the sources, the bandits opened fire on sighting the troops, leading to a gun duel.
“The troops responded decisively, forcing the bandits to retreat after a brief exchange of fire,” the source said.
The attackers reportedly fled through a nearby river, taking advantage of the difficult terrain.
The sources confirmed that no casualty was recorded among the troops during the encounter.
Following the incident, troops have intensified patrols and commenced combing operations in surrounding bushes to track down the fleeing suspects.
The operation is part of ongoing efforts by the military to curb banditry and sustain peace in the area.
Troops repel bandits’ attack in Agatu
Benue
News
Six more top bandit leaders eliminated alongside Ado Allero’s son in Zamfara offensive
Six more top bandit leaders eliminated alongside Ado Allero’s son in Zamfara offensive
By Zagazola Makama
Additional details have emerged on the identities of notorious bandit leaders eliminated during the recent military offensive in Tsafe Local Government Area of Zamfara State, where the son of feared kingpin Ado Allero and scores of fighters were neutralised.
At the heart of the operation was the elimination of Kachalla Iliya Sarki, the son of Ado Allero, alongside more than 65 fighters and several high-ranking commanders who had long orchestrated attacks, kidnappings, and cattle rustling across Zamfara and neighbouring states.

For years, the forests of Tsafe, Shinkafi, and Zurmi have served as operational bases for heavily armed groups, with Allero’s network emerging as one of the most feared. The death of his son, widely regarded as a rising figure within the hierarchy, is not just a tactical success, it is a symbolic strike at the core of the group’s command structure.
Security sources confirmed that the offensive, which targeted multiple camps in Munhaye and surrounding forest enclaves, led to the elimination of several key commanders.

Among them was Kachalla Biyabiki, a notorious kidnapping kingpin linked to numerous abductions in the western Tsafe axis. Intelligence indicated he had at least 10 victims in captivity at the time of his death, with ransom negotiations ongoing.
Also killed was Kachalla Dogon Bete, a feared field commander known for leading violent raids on rural communities and coordinating cattle rustling operations.
Other commanders neutralised include Kachalla Dan Bakolo, believed to be responsible for arms supply and logistics; Kachalla Na’Isa, a sub-commander involved in enforcement operations; Kachalla Yellow, linked to reprisal attacks; and Kachalla Mudi, associated with kidnapping activities along rural transit routes.

Together, these figures formed a critical part of the operational backbone of banditry in the Tsafe–Shinkafi corridor.
“These individuals were key actors within the network. Their neutralisation has disrupted command and control structures in the area,” a security source said.
The offensive, which targeted multiple camps in Munhaye and surrounding forest enclaves, also resulted in the destruction of hideouts and recovery of weapons and other logistics.
However, security experts warn that the killing of such high-profile figures—particularly the son of Ado Allero—may provoke retaliatory attacks by fleeing elements seeking revenge.
Troops have consequently intensified clearance operations, aerial surveillance, and aggressive patrols across Tsafe, Shinkafi, and adjoining areas to prevent regrouping and forestall possible reprisals.
Efforts are ongoing to track down remaining loyalists and dismantle residual cells operating within the wider Zamfara-Katsina forest corridor.
In Zamfara’s forests, where power shifts quickly and alliances are fluid, today’s victory can only be secured by tomorrow’s vigilance.
Six more top bandit leaders eliminated alongside Ado Allero’s son in Zamfara offensive
News
Why truth, not narratives, will end the killings in Plateau’s endless cycle of bloodshed
Why truth, not narratives, will end the killings in Plateau’s endless cycle of bloodshed
By Zagazola Makama
In Plateau State, the sound of gunfire is no longer shocking. It is expected. What follows each incident has also become predictable outrage, media attention, blames and accusations, as well as a rush to frame the tragedy within familiar narratives.
The latest reports of miners lynched by unknown gunmen have once again drawn national and international attention. Youth leaders, clerics, and advocacy groups are already describing the incident in sweeping terms, some branding it as genocide.
But beneath the headlines lies a more complicated and more troubling reality. Plateau is not witnessing isolated acts of violence. It is caught in a deeply entrenched cycle of reprisals, where attacks and counter-attacks have become the norm, and where truth is often buried beneath sentiment and selective narratives.
In the early hours of April 3, troops responded to a distress call from Sabongida village in Jos South Local Government Area. What they found was grim: the lifeless, beheaded body of a 30-year-old herder, identified as Shafiyu, lying in the bush. Security sources indicated that the killing was allegedly carried out by suspected Berom youths. Before the shock of that incident could settle, retaliation came swiftly.
Later that same day, armed men attacked an illegal mining site in Gyel village, Riyom Local Government Area. Three miners, including Samuel Davou, were killed in cold blood, while others fled for safety as troops moved in to secure the area. What might appear as separate incidents are, in reality, part of a continuous chain of violence, one feeding directly into the other.
Across Plateau, recent events reveal a troubling pattern that has defined the conflict for years.
On March 25, the body of Abdullahi Mohammed , a Fulani boy, was discovered in a shallow grave in Mangu Local Government Area, raising suspicions of targeted killing. On the same day in Riyom, irrigation farms belonging to several farmers were destroyed, by Fulani herdsmen, an act capable of provoking immediate retaliation.
Three days later, on March 28, gunmen assassinated Alhaji Bilyaminu Julde, a prominent Fulani community leader and Ardo of Gindiri, in Barkin Ladi. The attack, carried out at his residence, sent ignited tensions through the Fulani community and set off alarm bells across the state.
That same day, another flashpoint emerged in Riyom, where stray cattle destroyed farmlands in Tahoss village an incident that further strained relations between farmers and herders.
By April 2, violence had escalated again. In Bokkos Local Government Area, troops foiled an attack by suspected armed herders following a clash with vigilantes over grazing disputes. One vigilante sustained gunshot injuries.
Then came April 3, a day that encapsulated the crisis. Aside from the killing of the herder in Sabongida and the retaliatory attack on miners in Gyel, more killing were reported in Jos South.
On the same day, troops in Barkin Ladi recovered suspected rustled cattle reportedly taken by the Birom armed militia, while in Riyom, another Fulani youth was allegedly killed in an isolated attack. Each of these incidents is not just an entry in a security log. They are links in a chain, each one strengthening the justification for the next.
The Plateau conflict has increasingly been framed through singular lenses, often ethnic or religious. While these dimensions exist, they do not fully capture the complexity of what is happening on the ground. What emerges from security reports and field accounts is a cycle of reciprocal violence involving armed elements across communities. Fulani herders have been attacked and killed. Berom farmers and miners have also been targeted in deadly reprisals.
Yet, public discourse often pointing fongers only one side of the suffering.
This selective framing creates a dangerous distortion. It fuels anger, deepens divisions, and makes reconciliation even more difficult. More importantly, it prevents a clear understanding of the crisis one that is essential for any meaningful solution.
As observed by Simon Kolawole, the conflict has become a cycle of “attacks and counter-attacks, reprisals and counter-reprisals.”
In such an environment, violence becomes normalized. Communities begin to see retaliation not as a crime, but as justice.
Without accountability, peace remains elusive,”he said in his latest article, titled The Killing fields in plateau State.
In Plateau State, the search for peace has become a long, uncertain journey with no immediate destination in sight. Despite sustained military deployments and repeated calls for calm, deadly attacks continue to rage across communities, reinforcing a grim reality: this is a conflict deeply rooted in cycles of violence, mistrust, and silence.
For many residents, the first instinct after every attack is to look toward the government, Security forces and President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. Questions are asked why were the troops not there? Why was the intelligence not acted upon? Why are communities left exposed?
These concerns are valid. The primary responsibility of any government is the protection of lives and property. Yet, beneath these criticisms lies a difficult truth that is often left unspoken. In many cases, the same communities that demand protection are unwilling to confront the problem from within.
Across flashpoints in Riyom, Barkin Ladi, Bokkos, and Mangu, patterns have consistent which suggest that perpetrators of violence are not faceless outsiders operating in isolation. They are often known by name, by face, by affiliation. But they are rarely exposed. Instead, a culture of silence prevails. Fear, loyalty, and sometimes complicity prevent communities from identifying or handing over those responsible for attacks.
This silence creates a protective shield around perpetrators, allowing them to strike repeatedly without consequences. The result is a dangerous cycle: attacks occur, blame is assigned externally, and the real actors remain embedded within the communities.
There have been instances where youth leaders publicly blamed Fulani groups for atrocities even in cases where the victims themselves were Fulani. Such claims stretch logic and risk undermining credibility. The argument that a group would attack itself, rustle or poison its own livestock, and transport it into rival territory solely to assign blame raises fundamental questions.
While misinformation is a powerful tool in conflict, it cannot fully explain away patterns that are repeatedly documented by security agencies. These narratives, rather than promoting justice, deepen mistrust and inflame passions, making reconciliation more difficult.
This cycle has blurred the lines between victim and aggressor. Communities that mourn their dead today may be accused of launching attacks tomorrow. In such an environment, truth becomes contested, and justice becomes subjective. A herder is killed, reprisal follows.
Miners are attacked, revenge is planned.
Cattle are rustled, retaliation is inevitable. Each incident becomes both consequence and justification.
Intelligence gathering, the backbone of effective security operations depends heavily on local input. When communities withhold information, protect suspects, or distort facts, security agencies are left to operate in the dark.
This creates gaps that perpetrators exploit.
Blaming the government alone, without acknowledging this dynamic, presents an incomplete picture of the crisis.
Security forces have remained active, responding to distress calls, conducting patrols, and attempting to stabilize volatile areas. Yet, their presence has not been enough to stop the killings. The reality is that no amount of military deployment can fully secure a population that is unwilling to cooperate.
One of the most dangerous drivers of the conflict is impunity. For decades, perpetrators of violence in Plateau have rarely been brought to justice. Killings are recorded, condemned, and eventually forgotten until the next incident occurs.
Community, religious and youths leaders, who should serve as stabilizing forces, are increasingly unable to control armed youth groups. Such interventions are rare and often overshadowed by more powerful forces of anger and revenge. In many cases the leaders are the once directly fueling the crises and encouraging the youths to take up arms to carry out reprisals attacks.
The nature of the Plateau conflict makes it resistant to purely military solutions. This is not a conventional war with clear battle lines. It is a fragmented conflict driven by local grievances, economic competition, and historical mistrust.
Calls for heavy-handed interventions, including suggestions of foreign military involvement, fail to recognize this reality. Force alone cannot resolve a conflict that is rooted in social and communal dynamics.
If Plateau is to break free from this cycle, the first step must be honesty. The violence must be acknowledged for what it is a series of interconnected attacks involving multiple actors, not a one-sided campaign. Only then can meaningful solutions emerge.
This is not just a story of victims and aggressors. It is a story of a society caught in a loop of vengeance, where yesterday’s victim can become today’s perpetrator. Until the truth is confronted in its entirety without bias, without omission peace will remain elusive.
The government must move beyond reactive security measures and take decisive steps to address the root causes of the conflict. This includes ensuring accountability, strengthening intelligence capabilities, and facilitating genuine dialogue among communities.Equally important is the role of local leaders. They must rise above partisan interests and work actively to restrain their followers, promote peace, and reject all forms of violence regardless of who commits them.
Zagazola Makama is a Counter Insurgency Expert and Security Analyst in the Lake Chad Region
Why truth, not narratives, will end the killings in Plateau’s endless cycle of bloodshed
-
News2 years agoRoger Federer’s Shock as DNA Results Reveal Myla and Charlene Are Not His Biological Children
-
Opinions4 years agoTHE PLIGHT OF FARIDA
-
News12 months agoFAILED COUP IN BURKINA FASO: HOW TRAORÉ NARROWLY ESCAPED ASSASSINATION PLOT AMID FOREIGN INTERFERENCE CLAIMS
-
News2 years agoEYN: Rev. Billi, Distortion of History, and The Living Tamarind Tree
-
Opinions4 years agoPOLICE CHARGE ROOMS, A MINTING PRESS
-
ACADEMICS2 years agoA History of Biu” (2015) and The Lingering Bura-Pabir Question (1)
-
Columns2 years agoArmy University Biu: There is certain interest, but certainly not from Borno.
-
Opinions2 years agoTinubu,Shettima: The epidemic of economic, insecurity in Nigeria
