Connect with us

Uncategorized

Nigeria Spends $600m Importing Palm Oil Despite Vast Production Potential

Published

on

Nigeria Spends $600m Importing Palm Oil Despite Vast Production Potential

By: Michael Mike

Nigeria is spending about $600 million annually importing palm oil and its derivatives, despite being one of the crop’s natural homes and having the potential to become a major global producer and exporter, an industry stakeholder has disclosed.

The development, described as a major reversal of Nigeria’s fortunes in the oil palm industry, has raised fresh concerns over the country’s dependence on imports for a commodity it once produced in significant quantities for the international market.

The stakeholder, Lawal Olusola Lawal, who spoke at the unveiling of his book: “Trade Protectionism Disguised as Climate Advocacy: Why Europe is Demonizing the Oil Palm Tree,” said Nigeria had historically contributed about 45 per cent of global vegetable oil demand, but had since lost its competitive position following years of neglect and inadequate investment.

He said the country currently produces only about half of the palm oil required for domestic consumption, leaving a substantial supply deficit that is being met through imports.

“It is very disheartening that the commodity we used to sell to others is what we are now importing back into the country to augment our local production,” he said.

According to him, Nigeria’s import bill for palm oil and palm oil products stood at about $600 million in 2025, representing foreign exchange that could have been retained in the economy through increased domestic production and processing.

He said the problem went beyond the importation of crude palm oil, noting that Nigeria also imports many of the industrial derivatives required by manufacturers.

“About 100 per cent of the industrial derivatives used in industries, including the production of creamers, noodles and other products, are not being produced in Nigeria,” he said.

He attributed the situation largely to the failure to develop the country’s oil palm value chain beyond primary production.

The stakeholder argued that oil palm should no longer be viewed simply as a crop for producing cooking oil, stressing that the industry could support a broad manufacturing ecosystem and generate employment across several sectors.

According to him, oil palm produces numerous commercially valuable products, creating opportunities in food production, cosmetics, manufacturing, machinery, waste recycling and other industries.

He said the crop could produce different forms of oil for food and industrial applications, while its waste products could also be converted into other commercially useful materials.

“If we have a working industry, you have people working in the production of machinery, people collecting waste materials and turning them into other products,” he said.

He cited the experiences of Indonesia and Malaysia, which have developed their oil palm sectors into major sources of employment, export earnings and rural development.

The countries, he said, had demonstrated how investment in oil palm could lift millions of people out of poverty while generating substantial foreign exchange.

The stakeholder, who had earlier authored another book “How to Build Generational Wealth Through Oil Farming in Bigeria” dedicated to solving the nation’s oil palm production plight put the global palm oil market at about $300 billion, arguing that Nigeria should be taking advantage of the huge international market rather than using scarce foreign exchange to import products that can be produced locally.

He also disclosed that Nigeria was importing palm oil from neighbouring countries, further illustrating the extent of the country’s production deficit.

The development comes despite Nigeria’s favourable climate and long history of oil palm cultivation.

The stakeholder said the country had the land, climate and human resources required to regain its position but had failed to take advantage of those natural advantages.

Asked where Nigeria went wrong, he gave a blunt assessment: “One of the ways we got it wrong is negligence.”

He called for renewed investment in plantations, improved seedlings, modern processing facilities, access to affordable financing, research and development, and policies capable of attracting private-sector investment into the industry.

Lawal also urged policymakers to approach oil palm as an integrated industrial value chain rather than simply an agricultural commodity.

The revival of the sector, he argued, could help Nigeria reduce its import bill, conserve foreign exchange, create millions of jobs and ultimately return the country to the global export market.

For Nigeria, which once played a dominant role in the international oil palm trade, the shift from selling palm oil to the world to buying it from neighbouring countries is increasingly becoming a symbol of the wider challenge facing the country’s agricultural and manufacturing sectors.

The industry stakeholder maintained that reversing the trend remained possible, but warned that it would require sustained investment and an end to the neglect that allowed Nigeria to lose ground to countries that have successfully turned oil palm into a major economic engine.

Nigeria Spends $600m Importing Palm Oil Despite Vast Production Potential

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Uncategorized

Troops arrest three Fulani men in Plateau after farmer’s killing

Published

on

Troops arrest three Fulani men in Plateau after farmer’s killing

By: Zagazola Makama

Troops of Sector 6, Operation ENDURING PEACE (OPEP), have arrested three persons during a raid on two Fulani settlements in Bachi community, Riyom Local Government Area of Plateau State.

The operation, conducted on Sept. 13, 2026, followed a manhunt for criminal elements responsible for the killing of a farmer at Fang community in Riyom LGA on Sept. 12.

During the raid at Baggat and Shong 2 Fulani hamlets, troops arrested three residents identified as Anas Usman, Nuhu Mohammad and Haruna Ahmed.

Security sources said the three suspects are not necessarily the perpetrators of the killing, but their arrest is part of efforts to mount pressure on local Fulani leaders to assist security agencies in identifying and producing those responsible for the crime.

The suspects are currently in custody for further investigation and intelligence exploitation.

Troops arrest three Fulani men in Plateau after farmer’s killing

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Talata Mafara Attack: ISN Demands Intelligence Overhaul, Special Courts to Crush Banditry

Published

on

Talata Mafara Attack: ISN Demands Intelligence Overhaul, Special Courts to Crush Banditry

The Institute of Security, Nigeria (ISN) has called for a fundamental overhaul of Nigeria’s approach to terrorism, banditry and kidnapping, warning that criminal groups are becoming increasingly organised and capable of challenging the authority of the state.

The institute made the call while reacting to the reported invasion of Talata Mafara market in Zamfara State, where non-state actors allegedly imposed a ₦50 million levy and demanded 100 livestock, giving residents a seven-day ultimatum.

The ISN said the development exposed the need for security agencies to move beyond reactive operations and adopt stronger intelligence-led strategies capable of identifying and dismantling criminal networks before they launch attacks.

In a statement signed by its Deputy President and Chief Executive Officer, Barr. Adebayo Akinade, the institute said the activities of terrorists and bandits were no longer limited to isolated attacks but increasingly involved the control of economic activities, collection of illegal levies and disruption of legitimate livelihoods.

It warned that such activities could gradually establish a parallel system of criminal authority in affected communities if left unchecked.

The institute consequently urged the Federal and state governments to establish a coordinated security framework bringing together federal security agencies, state security outfits and vetted community guards.

It also called for the creation of a National Security Fusion Centre, supported by state-level fusion desks, to facilitate real-time intelligence sharing and faster responses to emerging threats.

According to the ISN, security agencies should penetrate criminal networks operating around markets, cattle-rustling routes and illicit livestock value chains while targeting the logistics and financial structures sustaining banditry.

It recommended regulated livestock markets and improved tracking systems to prevent stolen cattle from being absorbed into legitimate commercial channels.

The institute further proposed special courts for terrorism, kidnapping and banditry cases, arguing that a faster judicial process would strengthen the fight against organised criminal groups.

It urged the government to deploy modern technologies, including forest geo-fencing, livestock tracking, drones and citizen-reporting platforms, alongside improved tactical mobility and air surveillance.

The ISN also called for a two-hour rapid-response mechanism in vulnerable areas and increased investment in night-vision equipment and other specialised capabilities.

Beyond security operations, the institute advocated stronger community-based early-warning systems and local peace and security forums involving traditional rulers, farmers, market unions, faith organisations and civil society groups.

It urged citizens to report threats rather than surrendering to ransom and illegal levy demands, while encouraging communities to document attacks and preserve evidence for investigations and prosecution.

The institute said professional training in terrorism studies, intelligence management and counter-banditry operations should be strengthened as part of efforts to build a more effective national security architecture.

The ISN reaffirmed its readiness to support government and security agencies through research, training, policy advisory services and professional certification, saying a coordinated response was essential to restoring public confidence and protecting national development.

Talata Mafara Attack: ISN Demands Intelligence Overhaul, Special Courts to Crush Banditry

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

2026 Peace and Dialogue Awards: IPCR, Ufuk Foundation Call for Collective Investment in Peace

Published

on

2026 Peace and Dialogue Awards: IPCR, Ufuk Foundation Call for Collective Investment in Peace

By: Michael Mike

The Director-General of the Institute for Peace and Conflict Resolution (IPCR), Dr. Joseph Ochogwu, has called on governments, businesses, civil society organisations, religious and traditional institutions, communities and individuals to invest deliberately in peacebuilding, warning that the cost of conflict far exceeds the resources required to prevent it.

Ochogwu made the call on Thursday, September 10, 2026, while delivering a lecture titled “Investing in Peace: A Collective Responsibility for Everyone” at the 2026 Peace and Dialogue Awards organised by the Ufuk Dialogue Foundation Nigeria in collaboration with the IPCR in Abuja.

He said the awards should go beyond recognising individuals and organisations contributing to peacebuilding, stressing that Nigeria must begin to treat peace as an investment requiring consistent resources, planning and accountability.

According to Ochogwu, global military expenditure exceeded $2.4 trillion in 2024, while peacebuilding expenditure remained below $60 billion, representing about 2.5 per cent of military spending.

He questioned why trillions of dollars could be mobilised for conflict and military expenditure while significantly smaller amounts remained difficult to commit to conflict prevention and peaceful societies.

Ochogwu said the message was consistent with the 2026 International Day of Peace and International Day of UN Peacekeepers, but noted that the IPCR had further domesticated it as “Invest in Peace for Everyone, Everywhere, Everyday.”

“Peace cannot be a seasonal product for September 21st; it must be deliberate, daily, and for all,” he said.

He identified early-warning systems, peace education, youth employment, interfaith literacy, justice reform, community mediation, psychosocial healing, and greater participation of women and young people as key areas requiring investment.

The IPCR Director-General noted that the benefits of peacebuilding were often measured by conflicts that never occurred, making its returns less visible than conventional security spending.

He stressed that peacebuilding interventions must reflect the specific causes of conflicts in different parts of Nigeria. He identified extremism in the North-East, banditry in the North-West and North-Central, resource-related conflicts across the Middle Belt, separatist agitation in the South-East and urban fragility as major security and conflict challenges.

He also said West Africa and the Sahel were facing a convergence of violent extremism, unconstitutional political transitions, farmer-herder tensions and climate-induced displacement.

“A blanket approach will fail,” he warned, urging policymakers to develop interventions based on the specific drivers of conflict in each community and region.

Ochogwu also linked economic development to sustainable peace, saying the Federal Government’s economic reforms under the Renewed Hope Agenda could contribute directly and indirectly to peacebuilding.

He said job creation, poverty reduction and addressing economic vulnerabilities could help prevent communities and young people from becoming susceptible to conflict and violent mobilisation.

“Economic renewal is not a separate track; it is the bedrock on which peace is sustained,” he said.

He identified a perception gap, fragmentation of interventions, funding misalignment and the absence of effective mechanisms for tracking peace expenditure and its impact as major obstacles to peace investment.

According to him, less than 0.5 per cent of the budgets of Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) were coded for peacebuilding, while corporate social responsibility (CSR) spending rarely reached peacebuilding initiatives.

He therefore called for a system to track who invests in peace, how much is invested, where resources are deployed and the results achieved.

Ochogwu warned that failure to invest in peace carries significant economic and humanitarian consequences. He cited an estimated $19.1 trillion global economic cost of violence in 2024, equivalent to about 13.5 per cent of global GDP.

He added that every dollar not invested in conflict prevention could ultimately cost significantly more in humanitarian response and reconstruction.

According to him, farmer-herder conflicts had resulted in losses estimated at more than $14 billion over five years, while infrastructure damage in the North-East had exceeded $9 billion, with about 2.2 million people displaced.

“The cost of not investing in peace far exceeds the cost of investing in it,” he said.

To address the challenges, Ochogwu proposed a five-point compact aimed at making peacebuilding a shared responsibility across Nigerian society.

He called for the speedy implementation of the National Peace Policy, the establishment of a National Peace Investment Fund, legislation for a minimum three per cent peacebuilding allocation across relevant MDAs, and stronger coordination and early-warning responsibilities for the IPCR.

He also proposed committing at least one per cent of CSR expenditure to peacebuilding initiatives, including mediation centres, school peace clubs, early-warning technology and youth employment programmes in vulnerable communities.

The IPCR boss urged faith, traditional and community leaders to institutionalise interfaith dialogue and community-level dispute-resolution mechanisms in every ward, saying vulnerable communities often need trusted local mediators more than externally organised workshops.

He further called for stronger action against hate speech and disinformation, the generation of locally relevant evidence and the development of a Peace Investment Tracker Dashboard at the IPCR.

Ochogwu urged individuals and communities to make peace part of their daily conduct by avoiding escalation, accommodating neighbours, reporting early-warning signs and mentoring vulnerable young people.

“Peace must become everyone’s business,” he said.

The Chairperson of the 2026 Peace and Dialogue Awards, Inspector-General of Police Olatunji Rilwan Disu, NPM, also said peace and democracy were mutually reinforcing, stressing the importance of peaceful engagement in strengthening Nigeria’s democratic development.

2026 Peace and Dialogue Awards: IPCR, Ufuk Foundation Call for Collective Investment in Peace

Continue Reading

Trending

Verified by MonsterInsights