News
Nigeria’s Budget Should Build Lives, Not Fund Luxury – ActionAid
Nigeria’s Budget Should Build Lives, Not Fund Luxury – ActionAid
By: Michael Mike
ActionAid Nigeria has called on the Federal Government and state governments to redirect public spending from what it described as “prestige projects” and excessive government luxuries to investments that directly improve the lives of Nigerians, saying the country’s limited resources should be deployed to sectors with the greatest social impact.
The organisation made the call on Sunday while reacting to President Bola Tinubu’s recent directive to state governors to stop constructing unnecessary flyovers in areas without traffic congestion and instead focus on projects that address the needs of citizens.
In a statement signed by its Country Director, Dr. Andrew Mamedu, ActionAid Nigeria said the President’s comments should spark a broader national debate on public finance and the need to prioritise people-centred development over projects driven by political visibility.
According to the organisation, while infrastructure remains important, Nigeria’s challenge lies in a pattern of public expenditure that often favours prestige over citizens’ welfare.
It noted that with millions of Nigerians grappling with economic hardship, every naira of public funds should deliver measurable benefits.
ActionAid therefore urged governments at all levels to review spending on projects and activities it considers to have limited public value, including unnecessary prestige projects, luxury acquisitions, oversized official delegations, excessive local and foreign travel, and discretionary expenditures that lack transparency and accountability.
The organisation cited figures from the Budget Office of the Federation showing that President Tinubu and Vice President Kashim Shettima are proposed to receive a combined ₦9.36 billion in the 2026 budget for local travel, foreign travel, food and refreshments.
It, however, observed that the allocation does not necessarily represent the total cost of official trips, noting that expenses for accompanying officials and operational support are often captured separately in the budgets of other government agencies.
ActionAid argued that reducing the proposed allocation by half would free about ₦4.68 billion, which could be redirected to critical public services.
It estimated that such savings could finance approximately 62 three-classroom school blocks, 208 solar-powered boreholes and five fully equipped primary healthcare centres, based on recently published government project costs.
Mamedu said Nigeria’s budget should reflect the country’s development priorities rather than government extravagance.
“This is not merely a question of reducing expenditure; it is about changing national priorities. Every unnecessary luxury purchase represents classrooms that were never built. Every unjustifiable trip represents medicines that never reached a primary healthcare centre.
“Every unaccounted security vote represents communities that continue to live in fear without knowing how public resources intended for their protection were spent. Every prestige project that fails to address citizens’ needs represents another missed opportunity to reduce poverty and inequality. Public budgets are moral documents. They reveal whose interests governments choose to protect,” he said.
The organisation maintained that Nigeria’s development challenge is not the absence of resources but the choices governments make in allocating them.
It called on federal and state governments to prioritise spending on quality education, primary healthcare, water and sanitation, food security, climate resilience and social protection.
ActionAid also urged authorities to reduce the cost of governance by cutting unnecessary official travel, luxury purchases and oversized government delegations, while strengthening transparency and accountability in discretionary public spending, including security-related expenditure without compromising national security.
The organisation further advocated that infrastructure projects should be selected based on evidence, community needs and measurable development outcomes rather than political considerations, while calling for greater citizen participation in budget planning, implementation and monitoring.
It stressed that the true measure of governance is not the number of monuments erected but the number of lives transformed through improved education, healthcare, safe water, decent livelihoods and opportunities for citizens.
Nigeria’s Budget Should Build Lives, Not Fund Luxury – ActionAid
News
Athena Raises Alarm Over ‘Shrinking Democratic Space’ as EFCC Action, Campaign Fees Trigger Electoral Concerns
Athena Raises Alarm Over ‘Shrinking Democratic Space’ as EFCC Action, Campaign Fees Trigger Electoral Concerns
By: Michael Mike
Concerns over Nigeria’s electoral environment have intensified following warnings by the Athena Election Observatory that recent actions by public institutions, though within their legal mandates, could undermine confidence in democratic competition if not guided by stronger safeguards.
The election monitoring body, in a statement on Thursday, cautioned that the exercise of state power during election periods must be balanced with the need to protect political participation, institutional neutrality and public trust.
The warning comes after the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) restricted access to an account belonging to the Osun State Government on Aug. 5, as part of an investigation into alleged diversion of public funds — a move that attracted controversy because it occurred just days before the Aug. 15 Osun governorship election.
The Osun State Government has denied any wrongdoing.
President Bola Tinubu later directed the EFCC to take steps to reverse the restriction, while maintaining that the anti-graft agency remained independent.
Athena described the President’s intervention as a significant corrective action but said the episode exposed a deeper institutional challenge: the need for public agencies to anticipate how the timing and impact of their decisions may affect perceptions of electoral fairness.
The group stressed that anti-corruption investigations must not be suspended because of elections, noting that public resources must remain protected and institutions must continue to perform their statutory duties. However, it argued that actions capable of affecting an election environment require exceptional judgement, transparency and safeguards against unintended political consequences.
According to the Observatory, “legal authority should be accompanied by necessity, proportionality, transparency and safeguards against avoidable electoral disruption.”
The group’s concerns extended beyond the Osun development to controversial campaign advertising fees announced by Abia and Anambra States, which it said could create financial barriers capable of limiting political competition.
In Abia State, campaign advertising permit charges reportedly introduced by the state signage agency require presidential candidates to pay ₦200 million, governorship candidates ₦150 million, senatorial candidates ₦100 million, House of Representatives candidates ₦50 million and State House of Assembly candidates ₦20 million.
Anambra State has also announced advertising permit fees of ₦50 million for presidential candidates, ₦20 million for senatorial candidates, ₦5 million for House of Representatives candidates and ₦1.5 million for State House of Assembly candidates.
The regulations reportedly cover not only traditional outdoor advertisements such as billboards and posters but also branded materials, public address systems, rallies and other campaign-related activities.
Athena argued that while state governments have the authority to regulate public spaces, environmental standards and outdoor advertising, such powers must not become tools for imposing additional hurdles on electoral participation.
The group highlighted the financial implications of the Abia charges, noting that the fees consume a substantial portion of candidates’ legally permitted campaign spending limits under the Electoral Act 2026.
It pointed out that a ₦20 million permit fee for a State House of Assembly candidate represents one-fifth of the ₦100 million statutory expenditure limit for that election, before candidates spend money on campaign materials, logistics, mobilisation and other activities.
The Observatory warned that such requirements could disproportionately affect smaller political parties and less wealthy candidates, potentially strengthening the influence of money in politics rather than reducing it.
“Campaign expenditure limits are intended to restrain the influence of money and promote fair competition,” the group said, arguing that state-imposed political fees that consume a significant portion of those limits work against that objective.
Athena maintained that Nigeria’s democratic framework is built on the principle that elections should be governed by transparent and uniform rules, rather than additional conditions created by administrative authorities.
It called on Abia and Anambra States to withdraw candidate-specific campaign advertising fees and instead apply ordinary advertising regulations that are content-neutral and applicable to all users of public spaces.
The organisation also urged the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to issue national guidance clarifying that state and local regulatory powers cannot be used to introduce new conditions for participation in elections conducted under the Constitution and Electoral Act.
Athena said its position was not based on the interests of any political party, candidate or government involved in the controversies, but on protecting the integrity of Nigeria’s democratic institutions.
“Accountability, regulation and democratic competition should reinforce one another,” the group said. “Administrative power must not shrink democratic space.”
The warning comes as Nigeria approaches a new cycle of major elections, with civil society organisations increasingly urging state institutions to ensure that enforcement actions, regulations and administrative decisions are applied in ways that preserve public confidence in the neutrality of government institutions.
Athena Raises Alarm Over ‘Shrinking Democratic Space’ as EFCC Action, Campaign Fees Trigger Electoral Concerns
News
Berom Militia Killed four Fulani Harders, shots 25 Cattle in Fresh Attack in Plateau’s Riyom
Berom Militia Killed four Fulani Harders, shots 25 Cattle in Fresh Attack in Plateau’s Riyom
By Zagazola Makama
Four herders have been brutally killed and two others injured in a deadly attack by suspected Berom militia in Wereng Community of Riyom Local Government Area of Plateau State.

Intelligence sources told Zagazola Makama that troops of Sector 6 under Operation Enduring Peace responded at about 2:00 p.m. on Aug. 6 following reports of gunshots around Wereng Community.

On arrival, the troops combed the area and discovered the bodies of three herders, while two other victims were found with gunshot wounds and rescued.
The sources said the troops also found that 14 cattle had been killed during the attack, while another 11 cattle sustained gunshot injuries.
Preliminary investigations indicated that the affected herders were from Gwarim Community in Riyom Local Government Area and were allegedly attacked by suspected Berom militia operating from Angwan Wereng Community.

The bodies of the deceased were recovered by the troops, while the injured herders were evacuated to the Jos University Teaching Hospital (JUTH) for medical treatment.
Security sources said troops have intensified efforts to identify and apprehend those responsible for the attack.
They added that security personnel have continued to dominate the area to prevent any reprisal attack and maintain law and order as investigations into the incident continue.
Berom Militia Killed four Fulani Harders, shots 25 Cattle in Fresh Attack in Plateau’s Riyom
News
CP calls on residents to support security agencies in Yobe
CP calls on residents to support security agencies in Yobe
By: Yahaya Wakili
Yobe State Commissioner of Police, CP Usman Kanfani JJibrin, PSC, MSPSP, SM. ICM has called on residents of Yobe State to continue supporting security agencies by providing timely, credible, and actionable information.
He said the prevailing peace and security in the state can only be sustained through mutual trust, collaboration, and coordinated efforts among all security agencies.
CP Usman Kanfani Jibrin revealed this while receiving the newly posted state commandant of the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC), CC Hassan Owuna, at his office.
He maintained that the command’s unwavering commitment to fostering stronger inter-agency collaboration through intelligence-led policing, joint security building, and other coordinated strategies aimed at preventing and combating crime, protecting critical national assets, and ensuring the safety of lives and property across the state.
Earlier, the NSCDC Yobe State Commandant, CC Hassan Owuna, reaffirmed his commitment to strengthening the existing partnership between the police command and the NSCDC in Yobe State.
He emphasised the need for sustained cooperation, intelligence sharing, and operational synergy among security agencies to effectively address emerging security challenges and enhance public safety.
CC Owuna expressed appreciation for the warm reception accorded to him and his members of his management team.
CP calls on residents to support security agencies in Yobe
-
News2 years agoRoger Federer’s Shock as DNA Results Reveal Myla and Charlene Are Not His Biological Children
-
Opinions4 years agoTHE PLIGHT OF FARIDA
-
News1 year agoFAILED COUP IN BURKINA FASO: HOW TRAORÉ NARROWLY ESCAPED ASSASSINATION PLOT AMID FOREIGN INTERFERENCE CLAIMS
-
News2 years agoEYN: Rev. Billi, Distortion of History, and The Living Tamarind Tree
-
Opinions5 years agoPOLICE CHARGE ROOMS, A MINTING PRESS
-
ACADEMICS2 years agoA History of Biu” (2015) and The Lingering Bura-Pabir Question (1)
-
Columns2 years agoArmy University Biu: There is certain interest, but certainly not from Borno.
-
Politics1 year ago2027: Why Hon. Midala Balami Must Go, as Youths in Hawul and Asikira/Uba Federal Constituency Reject ₦500,000 as Sallah Gift
