Connect with us

News

Panel Absolves Military of Reuters’ Allegation of 10,000 Forced Abortion, Children Massacre

Published

on

Panel Absolves Military of Reuters’ Allegation of 10,000 Forced Abortion, Children Massacre

By: Michael Mike

The Special Independent Investigative Panel on Human Rights Violation in Counter-Insurgency Operations in North-East Nigeria (SIIP-North East) on Friday submitted its report to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC).

The panel was set up by NHRC to investigate Reuters’ allegations of human rights violation in the North Eastern region of the country by the Nigerian Army in its ongoing operations against insurgency in the area.

In the report of the seven-member panel chaired by a retired Justice of the Supreme Court, Justice Abdu Aboki, received by the Executive Secretary of the NHRC, Dr. Tony Ojukwu, the Nigerian military was absolved of the allegation of forced illegal abortions and massacre of children as alleged by Reuters, a foreign media agency.

According to the report presented by the General Counsel to the Panel, Mr. Hillary Ogbona, who is also the Senior Human Right Adviser to the NHRC boss: “The panel did not find evidence that the Nigerian Armed Forces committed a systematic, secret, or policy-driven abortion in the North-East to the tune of 10,000 abortions”.

The report said, the Panel found that, the Nigerian military had no agreement with any civilian healthcare institution to forcibly and illegally terminate pregnancies in the North-East.

Part of the report stated that: “There was no evidence before the panel to prove that. The panel found probability, based on witness testimony, that the NGO, Medecins San Frontieres (MSF) was engaged in abortion procedures for some years in the North East through its medical facilities that it operated”.

For smuggled, poisoned, and shot, which was also alleged by Reuters, Ogbona said, the panel did not find the Military culpable for the massacre of children in Kukawa, in Dasarua, in Abagano, and in many parts of Marte.

The report said, the panel found the military culpable of infanticide and the killing of community members in a village of Adisawe, in Marte local government area of Borno State, on the 16th of June, 2016, and that, the panel received witness testimonies, including those of survivors and relations of the deceased.

In terms of war on women, the SIIP-North-East also absolved the military, stating that the panel did not find that the Nigeria Armed Forces specifically targeted women in military camps or in IDP camps, adding that it did not find evidence to that effect.

“Rather, the panel found evidence from military sources and civilian sources, especially women and girls who are still in military custody and who have left internal displaced camps, that the military took care of them while they were in camps. A lot of them gave birth to children while they were in camps as well, and we saw evidence of all of those”, the report added.

The panel, in its recommendations contained in the report urged the Federal Government to compensate the victims of the killings in Abisare in Marte Local Government within 90 days of the receipt of the report.

It also recommended that the NHRC should work out a compensation regime and recommend same to the Federal Government within a period of 30 days from the receipt of the report and that, Nigerian Armed Forces and other appropriate authorities to constitute a Court Martial to prosecute suspected officers and men of the Defunct 8 Task Force Division, Monguno who were operational in Abisare, Marte Local Government of Borno State in June 2016 or other units of the Nigerian Armed Forces who were operational at the location within the same period.

The Panel also recommended the retirement of suspected officers and men of the Defunct 8 Task Force Division, Monguno who were operational in Abisare, Marte in June 2016 or other units of the Nigerian Armed Forces who were operational at the location within the same period.

It advised the Borno state Government to provide basic social facilities such as schools, hospitals and recreational centres in the recovered communities, especially in Kukawa and environs, ensuring
that children in the communities have access to basic education and adequate social development.

It also advised that the Borno state government develop and execute within six months of the submission of the report, in collaboration with the Nigerian Armed Forces and the UN System, a contextual standard of assessment of security situations in post-conflict communities prior to initiating the return of communities as well as a comprehensive economic and social empowerment programme for women recovering from conflict in the state.

The panel also recommended the strengthening of the mandate of the NHRC to play an oversight, monitoring and reporting roles in integrating human rights principles in the counter-insurgency operations and the rehabilitation, detention and prosecution of terrorist suspects, among others.

The Government and Military leadership, the report said, should implement robust protections for whistle-blowers who report human rights abuses within the military, ensuring they are safeguarded from retaliation and that, the Nigerian Military should ensure that all military operations are conducted without discrimination based on race, ethnicity, religion, or other statuses, respecting the human rights of all individuals involved.

Ogbona said, the panel’s report which took 18 months of thorough investigations, testimonies of 199 witnesses and visit to 20 field locations to produce would not only stand the test of time in terms of its thoroughness, but also in terms of the fact that the panel made almost good of a hopeless situation.

Speaking earlier, the chairman of the panel, Justice Abdu Aboki, said the challenges of conducting an investigation in a volatile environment as well as the non-appearance of Reuters and a few other key institutions made the Panel worked longer and more extensively, broadening its investigations and reach.

He revealed that the reporr include analyses of documentations and records received from state hospitals and the Nigerian military and several aspects of the investigative processes that would be instrumental in framing human rights accountability mechanism as well as the criminal justice system in Nigeria.

Aboki, who said the report is informative and would serve as a guide or future reference material for future Panels, highlighted the non-appearance of Reuters and the lack of cooperation from the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) as major challenges faced by the panel in the course of its investigation.

He called for the implementation of the recommendations contained in the report by the NHRC, the Federal and State governments, the Nigerian military, UN Agencies and NGOs working in the region.

Receiving the report, the NHRC boss said, the report embodies months of dedicated work in response to allegations of gross violations of human rights against the Nigerian Armed Forces reported in December 2022 by Reuters.

In the three-part report, he said, Reuters alleged that the Nigerian Military conducted illegal and forced termination of 10,000 pregnancies, extrajudicial killing of children, and the violation of the rights of women through targeted attacks during counter-insurgency operations in the North-East.

In response to the grave concerns, the NHRC, empowered by Sections 5 and 6 of the NHRC Act which gives it the mandate to receive complaints, investigate human rights violations in Nigeria and make appropriate determination and compensation to victims of human rights violations, established the independent panel to conduct a thorough and unbiased investigation.

The work of the panel, he said reflects a major contribution by the NHRC in ongoing efforts to ensure accountability and uphold human rights standards in Nigeria and assured of the commitment of the Commission to justice, transparency, and accountability to any form of human rights violation associated with conflict and insurgency.

He said, the findings and recommendations of the Panel, which offer both clarity and a call for action will instigate and inspire multi-stakeholder partnerships in humanitarian response in the North-East.

“They underscore the complexities and human costs of counter-insurgency operations in Nigeria’s North-East and provide a blueprint for meaningful reform. They highlight the urgent need for transparency within our security forces and the establishment of mechanisms to protect civilians.

“As part of our commitment to ensuring the panel’s recommendations are fully realized, the NHRC will be embarking upon series of public consultations and conversations on the report.

“The first of this series will be taking place in Maiduguri next week. We plan to host similar forums in Damaturu and Yola. In December, NHRC plans to host a Civil-Military Forum where the report and its implementation strategies will be discussed with all stakeholders.

“Additionally, the NHRC will work closely with military and medical institutions to foster respect for human rights in humanitarian situations. The NHRC is committed to ensuring that citizens of Abisari community identified in the report receive compensation and will continue to work with the military and the Office of the Attorney General to ensure that justice is served.

“The NHRC will liaise with our UN partners to propose human rights-based programs focused on the resettlement and reintegration of returnees and vulnerable populations, including children affected by conflict”, he added.

Ojukwu also said, the Commission is dedicated to actively monitoring progress and ensuring that every recommendation of the panel is pursued to the fullest.

It would be recalled that, in December 2022, Reuters published “Nightmare in Nigeria,” a three-part investigative report alleging series of systematic gross human rights violations by the Nigerian military during counter-insurgency operations in the North-East region.

These violations, the Reuters said, are targeted women and children, involving mass abortions and systematic killings of women and children.

Panel Absolves Military of Reuters’ Allegation of 10,000 Forced Abortion, Children Massacre

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crime

Troops neutralise three terrorist kingpins in Sokoto ambush

Published

on

Troops neutralise three terrorist kingpins in Sokoto ambush

By: Zagazola Makama

Troops of Operation FANSAN YAMMA (OPFY) have neutralised three notorious terrorist kingpins during a successful ambush operation in Sabon Birni Local Government Area (LGA) of Sokoto State.

Zagazola Makama report that the operation was conducted on July 25 between Mallamawa and Mazau villages in the Tsamaye/Mai Lalle District of the LGA.

During the operation, the troops neutralised the terrorists identified as Kachalla Nagomma, Gurmu and Ali Yar Daribiyar, and recovered three AK-47 rifles with magazines and a motorcycle.

Sources told Zagazola that the terrorists and their foot soldiers were in the area to collect ransom and illegal levies imposed on residents when they were ambushed by the troops.

The source said the operation has triggered widespread relief and jubilation among residents of Mai Lalle, Tsamaye, Rimaye and nearby communities across Sabon Birni and Goronyo LGAs.

“These terrorists have long tormented the communities with killings, kidnappings and extortion, so this success is a huge morale boost for the people,” the source added.

The troops have continued to intensify kinetic and non-kinetic efforts in synergy with other security agencies and local vigilante groups.

The military has urged members of the public to continue providing credible and timely information to assist the troops in sustaining momentum against criminal elements.

Troops neutralise three terrorist kingpins in Sokoto ambush

Continue Reading

News

Amnesty International must stop defending dangerous falsehoods in the name of free speech

Published

on

Amnesty International must stop defending dangerous falsehoods in the name of free speech

By: Zagazola Makama

Once again, Amnesty International has taken a predictable but deeply troubling stance, this time, condemning the lawful detention of a social media influencer, Ghali Isma’il, who is facing charges over a false and provocative video announcing the death of Nigeria’s sitting President. In its hasty and one-sided statement, Amnesty labeled the Department of State Services’ (DSS) action as “a clear demonstration of abuse of power.” This knee-jerk condemnation reeks not only of bias but of a dangerous disregard for the responsibility that comes with free speech.

It’s important to remember that the Nigerian authorities are acting within the bounds of the law. Ghali Isma’il appeared before a competent magistrate and is being tried for spreading false information an issue of concern to public safety and stability. The viral video claiming the President’s death by poisoning, however unfounded and provocative, point to the need for responsible speech, especially in a period when misinformation can quickly escalate tensions or cause panic.

Let’s be clear: no one is above the law. Isma’il was not whisked away to a secret cell. He was arraigned before a competent magistrate court in Abuja and is being tried according to the laws of the land. The charges spreading false information with intent to cause public alarm and inciting disaffection against the government are not political fabrications.

They are legitimate concerns, especially when tied to a video falsely claiming that President Bola Tinubu had died after being poisoned, and presented with an air of certainty that could spark panic in a country already battling complex security and economic challenges.

If this is what Amnesty International classifies as “freedom of expression,” then the organization must clarify where it draws the line between speech and sabotage. Are we now to accept that individuals can publish death hoaxes about national leaders and peddle wild, fabricated conspiracy theories under the guise of digital activism? Would Amnesty extend this same compassion if the target were a leader in Europe or America?

Is it truly free speech when falsehoods threaten public order or incite unrest? Would Amnesty International hold the same stance if similar misinformation targeted leaders in other parts of the world? These are complex issues with no easy answers, but it is crucial that we weigh the right to expression against the potential harm caused by reckless or deliberately false content.

Let us also not forget that this is not Ghali Isma’il’s first brush with dangerous disinformation. He has repeatedly posted bizarre claims including that former U.S. President Donald Trump was compelling Nigeria to repatriate terrorists into the country and quoting the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Yusuf Tugger, who never mentioned such in his interview. Yusuf said they are ex- convict from Venezuela but Ismail, said they are “Terrorists” . When does free speech become reckless speech? When does falsehood become a threat to national peace and cohesion? This calls for a measured discussion on when speech crosses into dangerous territory especially when it influences public perception and stability.

Moreover, one must ask: where was Amnesty International when ISWAP terrorists released gruesome videos of mass executions? Where was Amnesty when bandits kidnapped and murdered citizens or when IPOB loyalists torched police stations and killed security personnel? The silence or muted response from Amnesty International in those cases raises questions about consistency and priorities. Their silence in the face of these atrocities is deafening. Yet, whenever the Nigerian state acts to preserve order and prevent chaos, Amnesty rushes in with a press release always siding with the provocateur.

Ultimately, the right to free speech must be exercised responsibly. Supporting lawful limits when speech could threaten national peace isn’t a contradiction to human rights but a recognition of their importance in a complex society.

Amnesty International faces an important question: will it stand as a defender of genuine human rights and democratic stability, or does it risk becoming a platform that inadvertently enables disinformation that jeopardizes it?

This double standard is becoming increasingly apparent to Nigerians. The right to free speech must be protected, yes but it must also be exercised with responsibility. Defending lies that threaten national unity under the cloak of human rights advocacy is not activism; it is sabotage.

Amnesty International must decide: is it here to protect Nigeria’s democracy or to shield those who exploit social media to endanger it?

Zagazola Makama is a Counter Insurgency Expert and Security Analyst in the Lake Chad Region

Amnesty International must stop defending dangerous falsehoods in the name of free speech

Continue Reading

News

Abuja property mogul raises alarm over FCTA’s MoU with developers

Published

on

Abuja property mogul raises alarm over FCTA’s MoU with developers

By: Michael Mike

Managing Director, Abuja Technology Village Free Zone Company Limited, Yohana Dyelkop has raised an alarm over a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) purportedly signed by the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) and some property developers.

The businessman, who expressed this concern at a news conference on Saturday in Abuja, said he was worried by media reports about the said land development MoU.

He said media reports recently indicated that the Ministry of the Federal Capital Territory had sealed an agreement with some local and foreign investors to develop 200 hectares of land in the Abuja Technology Village.

According to him, the reports specifically allege that the MoU has purportedly been signed between FCTA and two organisations, Mag International Links Limited and the National Agency for Science and Technology (NASENI).

Dyelkop said that government’s genuine efforts to attract foreign investment, especially property developers, was commendable but it was expedient to clarify that Abuja Technology Village has numerous plots across various districts.

He warned that his properties: Plots 22 and 23, C17 Industrial Area 2, Pyakasa Village, Airport Road, are located within the area earmarked for the allocation.

“Unless the MoU explicitly excludes these plots, any agreement covering them would be unlawful,” he stressed.

Dyelkop warned that the prospective developers should steer clear of his land as they are subjects of ongoing litigation, adding that cases of land grabbing and encroachment were rampant in the FCT.

According to him, his company has officially written to the parties involved expressing its concern about the MoU, warning them and the prospective investors to steer clear of his properties and avoid possible contempt of court.

“We are concerned about news reports regarding an MoU between the entities and the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) for the purpose of land development.

“Specifically, Plots 22 and 23, C17 Industrial Area 2, Pyakasa Village, Airport Road, are subject to ongoing litigation, with the Hon. Minister as a defendant.

“All parties have been served with a court order, and unless the MoU explicitly excludes these plots, any agreement covering them would be unlawful,” he added.

The real estate mogul, who is also the National Chairman of a political group, “Better Opportunities With Tinubu (BOWT) 2027, called for caution and respect for the rule of law to avoid denting President Bola Tinubu’s image.

Abuja property mogul raises alarm over FCTA’s MoU with developers

Continue Reading

Trending

Verified by MonsterInsights