News
Petition Seeks Probe of NEPC CEO Over Alleged Financial Misconduct, Abuse of Office, Nepotism
Petition Seeks Probe of NEPC CEO Over Alleged Financial Misconduct, Abuse of Office, Nepotism
…As New Allegations Add to Earlier Auditor-General Query Over N230.5 Million Foreign Travel Expenditure….
By Zagazola Makama
A petition has called on Nigeria’s anti-corruption, oversight and law enforcement agencies, ICPC, EFCC to launch an independent, impartial and comprehensive investigation into a series of allegations involving the Executive Director/Chief Executive Officer of the Nigerian Export Promotion Council (NEPC), Mrs. Nonye Ayeni.
The latest petition adds to earlier public concerns surrounding the NEPC boss following an audit query by the Office of the Auditor-General of the Federation (OAGF), details of which were previously reported by SaharaReporters, alleging breaches of Federal Government directives regulating official foreign travel amounting to N230.5 Million.
Despite undergoing investigations at various Nigeria’s anti graft agencies, corruption and abuse of office had persisted in the NEPC.
The latest petition, which stressed that all allegations should be investigated strictly in accordance with due process and the rule of law, urged investigators to determine the facts solely on the basis of credible evidence while ensuring that any individual against whom the allegations are not substantiated is fully exonerated.
According to the petition, the allegations relate to financial misconduct, abuse of office, administrative irregularities, nepotism, violations of the Public Service Rules and other actions allegedly affecting the administration of the Council.
One of the central allegations concerns the suspected diversion of approximately ₦500 million, said to represent about 20 per cent of the Council’s quarterly subvention intended to support Nigeria’s non-oil export sector.
The petition alleged that the funds were diverted through a coordinated arrangement involving certain Directors and State Coordinators, with portions of allocations to state offices allegedly transferred through a Bureau de Change operator for conversion into United States dollars before being remitted through an official in the Accounts Department.
It called on investigators to conduct a comprehensive forensic audit of the Council’s finances, including bank records, payment vouchers, electronic transactions, communication records and other financial documents, to establish whether such transactions occurred.
The petition also raised allegations of falsification of official service records, claiming that several Directors who ought to have retired from the Federal Public Service remained in office after their personnel records, including dates of birth, were allegedly altered.
It requested investigators to compare current personnel records with original employment documents, nominal rolls and historical service records to determine whether any unlawful alterations were made.
Another issue highlighted in the petition concerns the alleged irregular engagement of retired officers on contract appointments.
According to the petition, retired members of staff were allegedly re-engaged without transparent procedures and contrary to established Federal Public Service guidelines, with claims that some appointments were intended to favour individuals perceived to be loyal to the current management.
The petition requested a detailed review of all contract appointments involving retired officers to determine whether they complied with existing laws, regulations and Federal Government policies.
The petition further alleged that the NEPC Chief Executive sought blanket approval from the Honourable Minister of Industry, Trade and Investment to appoint External Directors of her choice.
According to the allegations, the approval was intended to facilitate the appointment or return of certain retired loyalists into strategic positions within the Council.
The petition urged investigators to examine all correspondence relating to the request and determine whether the process complied with applicable legal and administrative procedures.
The petition also alleged widespread nepotism and abuse of administrative authority, claiming that professionally qualified officers had been removed from positions consistent with their expertise and replaced by individuals allegedly selected on the basis of personal loyalty or ethnic affiliation rather than merit.
Among the examples cited was the alleged transfer of a professionally certified ICAN accountant from the Internal Audit Department to an operational unit unrelated to his professional qualifications, while another officer was reportedly appointed in his place.
It also alleged that the Council’s certified Procurement Officer was redeployed from the Procurement Unit to a state office and replaced by an officer who allegedly lacked the required professional procurement certification.
According to the petition, if established, such actions could amount to violations of the Public Service Rules and undermine merit-based administration.
The petition equally alleged that several substantive Directors had been denied office accommodation and administrative privileges ordinarily associated with their positions.
It claimed the affected Directors were perceived as outspoken officers who consistently advised management to comply with due process in the administration of Council affairs. Investigators were urged to determine whether such actions amounted to victimisation, abuse of administrative authority or unfair labour practices.
The petition also questioned the management of official foreign travel and estacode payments.
It alleged that estacode and other travel allowances were approved and paid to certain officials regarded as loyal to management for overseas trips they allegedly never undertook.
The petition requested investigators to examine travel approvals, immigration records, airline tickets, boarding records, passport entry and exit stamps, estacode payments and other related expenditure documents to verify whether public funds were improperly disbursed.
It also raised concerns over what it described as unusually high expenditure during official foreign trips, including alleged excessive spending on shopping and related expenses.
According to the petition, investigators should review travel approvals, estacode payments, procurement records, receipts and expenditure documents to determine whether public funds were properly utilised and whether all spending complied with financial regulations.
The petition further alleged that management frequently failed to properly delegate authority to appropriate Directors whenever the Chief Executive embarked on official domestic or international engagements.
According to the petition, this practice allegedly disrupted efficient administration and should be examined to determine compliance with established administrative procedures.
On staff welfare and workplace culture, the petition alleged that employees had complained of intimidation, abusive language, victimisation and an unwillingness by management to accept professional advice. It stated that the alleged conduct had created a hostile working environment that negatively affected staff morale and institutional performance.
The petition recommended that investigators independently verify these claims through interviews with serving and former members of staff. It also alleged inadequate engagement between the Council’s leadership and exporters, saying many stakeholders reportedly found it difficult to secure official meetings with the Chief Executive despite the Council’s statutory responsibility to support Nigeria’s export sector.
According to the petition, investigators should assess whether stakeholder engagement practices were consistent with the Council’s mandate and principles of good public administration. Another allegation contained in the petition was that the Chief Executive allegedly claimed that proceeds from the alleged financial misconduct were used to influence or obtain protection from certain public officials.
The petition urged investigators to independently determine whether such statements were made and, where necessary, investigate any individuals who may be implicated while ensuring due process.
As part of the requested investigation, the petition called for a forensic audit of the Council’s finances; examination of bank records, payment trails and electronic transactions; verification of personnel files, retirement records and nominal rolls; review of contract appointments involving retired officers; examination of procurement processes and foreign travel expenditures; verification of estacode payments against actual travel records; review of correspondence relating to appointments and approvals; interviews with staff, whistleblowers, exporters and other stakeholders; and assessment of compliance with the Public Service Rules, Financial Regulations, the Public Procurement Act and other applicable laws.
The petition stated that its objective was to promote transparency, accountability, integrity and the prudent management of public resources entrusted to the Nigerian Export Promotion Council for the development of Nigeria’s non-oil export sector.
It emphasised that all findings should be based solely on credible evidence, due process and the rule of law, adding that anyone found culpable should be held accountable in accordance with the law, while any person against whom the allegations were not substantiated should be fully exonerated.
Earlier Auditor-General Query
The fresh petition comes months after the Office of the Auditor-General of the Federation reportedly issued an audit query against Mrs. Ayeni over her official foreign travel expenditure during the 2024 fiscal year.
According to a report by SaharaReporters, the audit alleged that Mrs. Ayeni embarked on numerous international trips in 2024 at a total cost of ₦230,540,843, contrary to Federal Government directives aimed at reducing public expenditure.
The report said auditors found that the NEPC chief undertook four international trips in the first quarter of 2024, two trips in the second quarter, two in the third quarter and seven international trips in the fourth quarter.
The Auditor-General’s report reportedly cited Circular No. PRS080/ADM/GEN/I dated Sept. 18, 2023, and another directive dated Feb. 21, 2024, both issued by the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, which restricted publicly funded international travel by government officials to a maximum of two trips per quarter.
The audit also reportedly referred to the March 12, 2024 circular signed by the Chief of Staff to the President, Mr. Femi Gbajabiamila, which suspended publicly funded foreign trips from April 1, 2024, except where expressly approved.
According to SaharaReporters, the audit alleged that Mrs. Ayeni continued embarking on numerous foreign trips despite the restrictions and questioned whether several of the journeys met the test of necessity or relevance to the statutory mandate of the NEPC.
Among the examples cited was an alleged payment of ₦16.8 million for airfare and estacode to attend the opening of a Zenith Bank branch in Paris, France, an event which the auditors reportedly questioned on the grounds that it was allegedly unrelated to the Council’s official mandate.
The audit also reportedly raised concerns over overlapping travel schedules involving trips to Las Vegas, Abu Dhabi, Ghana and Qatar within closely connected dates, questioning whether all the events could have been attended as claimed and whether excess estacode, if any, was refunded.
According to SaharaReporters, the Office of the Auditor-General recommended that the entire ₦230.54 million spent on the disputed foreign trips be recovered and refunded to government coffers, describing the expenditure as inconsistent with government financial regulations and fiscal discipline measures introduced by the Tinubu administration.
Though the spokesperson for the Nigerian Export Promotion Council, Mr. Aliu Seidu Sadiq, denied the previous allegations and disputed the claim that the Chief Executive undertook foreign trips amounting to the figure stated in the audit report, the matter was still under investigation.
Mrs. Ayeni and the Nigerian Export Promotion Council had not publicly responded to the latest allegations contained in the petition at the time of filing this report while efforts to obtain comments from Mrs. Nonye Ayeni and the NEPC before publication were unsuccessful.
Zagazola Media Network
News
Nigeria, India Sign Landmark Human Rights Pact, Fagbemi Backs Stronger Institutional Independence
Nigeria, India Sign Landmark Human Rights Pact, Fagbemi Backs Stronger Institutional Independence
…AGF pledges justice ministry’s support for implementation, demands practical safeguards for citizens in AI era
By: Michael Mike
Nigeria and India have signed a bilateral agreement to strengthen human rights protection, institutional capacity and access to justice, with the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Prince Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, pledging the Federal Government’s support for its implementation.
Fagbemi, who described the agreement as a strategic partnership between the two countries, said its success would ultimately be measured by its impact on ordinary citizens, particularly vulnerable and marginalised groups seeking justice.
The agreement, executed between the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) of Nigeria and its Indian counterpart, is designed to deepen institutional cooperation, facilitate knowledge transfer, promote technical exchanges and strengthen operational capacity in addressing human rights violations.
The Attorney-General gave the government’s position on Tuesday in Abuja when he received a joint delegation of the two commissions at the Federal Ministry of Justice, describing the partnership as timely, particularly in an increasingly interconnected world where effective human rights protection requires stronger legal frameworks, institutional collaboration and respect for the rule of law.
The development followed a high-level engagement between the two commissions and the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), at the Supreme Court Complex, Abuja, on Monday, as part of a two-day working visit by the Indian delegation.
The Nigerian delegation was led by the Executive Secretary of NHRC, Chief Tony Ojukwu, SAN, OFR, while the Indian delegation was headed by the Chairperson of India’s NHRC, Justice V. Ramasubramanian, accompanied by the Commission’s Joint Secretary, Mr. Samir Kumar.
Fagbemi said the partnership brought together two major democracies with shared common-law traditions, diverse populations and dynamic constitutional frameworks, expressing satisfaction with the thematic areas identified for cooperation under the agreement.
He specifically highlighted access to justice and the protection of digital rights as critical areas requiring urgent attention, particularly as emerging technologies, including Artificial Intelligence, continue to reshape society and create new human rights concerns.
According to him, both countries must develop legal safeguards to protect data privacy, prevent algorithmic bias and safeguard civic space, while ensuring that technological advancement does not undermine fundamental freedoms.
He said the Ministry of Justice expected the two commissions to produce actionable research and policy recommendations capable of addressing these emerging challenges.
Beyond emerging technologies, the Attorney-General stressed that Nigeria’s commitment to human rights must be reflected in the practical implementation of constitutional guarantees and international obligations, rather than merely in the existence of legal provisions.
He cited the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, which Nigeria domesticated through the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act, Cap. A9, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004, as a major instrument underpinning the country’s human rights jurisprudence.
The Charter provides important protections relating to non-discrimination, human dignity, fair trial and personal liberty, reinforcing the fundamental rights guaranteed under Nigeria’s Constitution.
Fagbemi maintained that the true measure of a country’s commitment to human rights was its ability to translate constitutional provisions into accessible institutions, accountable public authorities and an independent judiciary.
He assured the Indian delegation that the Federal Ministry of Justice fully supported the bilateral initiative and was prepared to facilitate technical engagements, joint legal reviews and policy consultations aimed at improving the efficiency of the justice sector.
The Attorney-General also used the engagement to reaffirm the institutional independence of Nigeria’s National Human Rights Commission, stressing that its autonomy was essential to its credibility and effectiveness.
He specifically drew attention to Section 6(3) of the National Human Rights Commission (Amendment) Act, 2010, which provides that the Commission, in exercising its statutory functions, shall not be subject to the direction or control of any other authority or person.
According to him, the administration has continued to respect and protect the Commission’s statutory independence, describing it as fundamental to institutional integrity.
He further noted that the relationship between the NHRC and the Federal Ministry of Justice had been characterised by constructive institutional synergy, mutual respect and a shared commitment to advancing human rights.
The Attorney-General commended Ojukwu and the Nigerian commission for spearheading the bilateral initiative, while expressing appreciation to the Indian delegation for bringing its expertise and institutional experience to the partnership.
Earlier, during Monday’s engagement with the Chief Justice of Nigeria, the Executive Secretary of NHRC Nigeria had emphasised the complementary responsibilities of the judiciary and national human rights institutions in protecting fundamental freedoms, upholding the rule of law and ensuring access to justice.
Ojukwu identified complaint management, Alternative Dispute Resolution, security sector accountability, comparative legal research, digital rights, Artificial Intelligence ethics and environmental justice as priority areas for cooperation between both countries.
The Chief Justice reaffirmed the commitment of the Nigerian Judiciary to human rights protection and encouraged both commissions to exchange experiences and adopt best practices, particularly in strengthening safeguards for vulnerable groups, including women, children and persons with disabilities.
The Indian delegation described the engagement as significant to relations between the two countries, noting that the MoU represented a first-of-its-kind institutional partnership for India’s National Human Rights Commission.
The agreement is expected to promote sustained institutional exchanges, strengthen complaint-handling mechanisms, improve professional capacity and encourage comparative research into legal and policy approaches to human rights protection.
The partnership also comes at a time when national human rights institutions face increasing demands to address abuses linked to security operations, discrimination, environmental degradation, digital surveillance and the misuse of emerging technologies.
For Nigeria, the collaboration offers an opportunity to strengthen its human rights enforcement architecture through international knowledge-sharing while reinforcing the independence and operational effectiveness of its national commission.
Fagbemi, however, cautioned that the ultimate benchmark of the agreement must go beyond official engagements and institutional exchanges to deliver tangible improvements in the lives of citizens, especially those most vulnerable to violations and denied access to justice.
He wished the Indian delegation a productive stay in Nigeria and expressed confidence that the partnership would advance the shared commitment of both countries to human dignity, justice and the protection of fundamental rights.
Nigeria, India Sign Landmark Human Rights Pact, Fagbemi Backs Stronger Institutional Independence
News
NSCDC Strengthens Gender Policy Implementation, Trains Officers on SGBV, Digital Safety
NSCDC Strengthens Gender Policy Implementation, Trains Officers on SGBV, Digital Safety
By: Michael Mike
Corps partners SPRING, FCDO, TechHer to promote women’s participation in peacebuilding, tackle technology-facilitated violence
The Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) has intensified efforts to combat sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV), strengthen women’s participation in security decision-making and promote digital safety among young people through the implementation of its Gender Policy II.
The Commandant-General of the Corps, Prof. Ahmed Audi, stated this at a two-day Gender, Women, Peace and Security capacity-building training organised at the NSCDC College and Support Staff Service, Udege, Nasarawa State.
The training was organised in collaboration with Strengthening Peace and Resilience in Nigeria (SPRING), with support from the United Kingdom’s Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO).
Audi, who delivered his keynote address through a representative, said the policy provided a framework for mainstreaming gender considerations into the Corps’ operations, personnel management, leadership structure and community engagement.
He stressed the need for effective prevention and response to sexual and gender-based violence, including conflict-related abuses and technology-facilitated violence.
The Commandant-General also called for increased participation of women in peacebuilding and security decision-making, equal opportunities within the Corps and stronger partnerships with traditional institutions, government agencies, civil society organisations and development partners.
He urged commands and personnel, particularly Gender Desk Officers, to ensure effective coordination, timely reporting, appropriate referrals, monitoring and accountability in handling gender-related cases.
Audi described the implementation of the policy as a collective responsibility requiring sustained commitment across all levels of the Corps.
In a goodwill message, the Osu Ajiri of Edege Chiefdom, Alhaji Suleiman Ahmed Eko IV, commended the NSCDC for its presence in the community, saying its operations had strengthened the sense of security among residents, particularly farmers.
The traditional ruler pledged the support of his council in addressing gender-based violence, describing the protection of the community as a priority.
Earlier, the Commander of the College, ACG Jamilu Indabawa, said collaboration among relevant stakeholders was critical to achieving effective implementation of the gender policy.
The Gender Equality, Diversity and Social Inclusion Lead of SPRING, Mrs Amina Akano-Bello, said the training was designed to promote peaceful and resilient communities through early identification and response to gender-based violence, as well as the inclusion of women and young people in leadership.
Also, the NSCDC National Headquarters Gender Unit Adviser, DCC Ajet Kemi, provided participants with insights into the different forms of sexual and gender-based violence, their societal implications and preventive measures.
A retired Assistant Commandant-General, Ahmed Abodurin, who facilitated a session on institutional ethics in gender policy implementation, emphasised professionalism, accountability, gender sensitivity and adherence to institutional standards.
Beyond the capacity-building exercise, the Corps partnered TechHer, an organisation promoting women’s advancement through technology, to extend digital safety awareness to schools in Udege.
The outreach, themed “Stop Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence”, educated students on the dangers of digital abuse, responsible online behaviour and measures for staying safe in digital spaces.
Representatives of the Federal Ministry of Interior, Nasarawa State Ministry of Women Affairs and Social Development, Nasarawa State Ministry of Justice and Gammuo International also delivered goodwill messages, reaffirming the importance of collective action in advancing gender equality, peace and security.
NSCDC Strengthens Gender Policy Implementation, Trains Officers on SGBV, Digital Safety
News
Bank customer alleges N2.59m theft from two GTBank accounts
Bank customer alleges N2.59m theft from two GTBank accounts
By: Michael Mike
A customer of Guaranty Trust Bank, Stella Adepegba, has accused the bank of negligence after fraudsters allegedly stole N2.59m from two accounts belonging to her and her daughter within 24 days.
Adepegba said the incidents occurred on October 8 and November 1, 2026, with the perpetrators allegedly transferring funds without authorisation or security notifications.
She accused the bank of failing to refund the money despite repeated complaints and assurances that the matter would be resolved.
According to her, the first incident involved her daughter, Victoria Adepegba, whose Child Saver’s Account was allegedly compromised on October 8 at about 8pm.
She explained that N2.507m was transferred through the Nigeria Inter-Bank Settlement System Instant Payment channel in four transactions, leaving less than N2,000 in the account.
Adepegba said N399,000, N398,000 and N220,000 were transferred to a Moniepoint account bearing the name Abdulmalik Idris, while another N1.49m went to a GoMoney account bearing the name Zainab Ibrahim.
She alleged that no debit alerts were received, adding that a GTBank employee informed her of the transactions and offered to block the account after the money had already been withdrawn.
The complainant said she reported the incident at the bank’s Kubwa branch in Abuja on October 9 and was instructed to document the unauthorised transactions.
However, she alleged that the bank subsequently sent an email attributing the transactions to compromised login credentials, an explanation she rejected.
Adepegba said another N80,000 was fraudulently transferred from her personal GTBank account on November 1 to a FairMoney account bearing the name Jamilu Ahmad, bringing the cumulative loss to N2.587m.
“GTB could not explain how the hackers successfully stole my money despite changing my account’s log-in details after the attack on my daughter’s account. The bank must refund the stolen funds and go after those who masterminded the fraud,” she said.
She insisted that her mobile phone, SIM card and ATM card were in her possession during both incidents, adding that she neither disclosed her banking credentials nor received OTP requests.
“The implication of these targeted attacks on my bank accounts is that no customer’s funds are safe with GTB, and if anything happens, the bank will not accept responsibility or offer any succour whatsoever,” she lamented.
She stated that a compliance officer, Innocent Ukatu, and the bank’s media consultant, Cornelius Onuoha, initially assured her that the complaint would be resolved.
Reacting to the incident, the Chief Communications Officer of Guaranty Trust Holding Company Plc, Mrs Oyinade Adegite, said the incidents had been investigated and feedback provided to the customer.
She attributed the compromise to customer-side security vulnerabilities, explaining that fraudsters increasingly deploy sophisticated phishing techniques to obtain banking credentials.
“Immediately this came up, it was escalated and investigated, and feedback has been given,” she said.
Adegite explained that customers could unknowingly compromise their accounts by clicking malicious links that install malware that can capture sensitive information.
“Now it’s a phishing link you might click on that sometimes would actually install malware on your phone,” she said.
She maintained that the bank had implemented the necessary security safeguards, including two-factor authentication, and insisted the compromise originated on the customer’s end.
“All the measures the bank has to put in place for us, 2FA, everything was done. So, the compromise came clearly from the customer,” she stated.
However, she expressed sympathy for the losses and said she would follow up on the second incident to explore possible intervention.
The allegations come amid regulatory scrutiny of Nigerian banks over consumer protection and compliance failures.
An earlier analysis of audited financial statements showed that Guaranty Trust Holding Company, GTBank’s parent company, incurred N383.65m in regulatory penalties in Nigeria in 2024.
The sanctions included N56m for consumer protection violations, N160.4m following a Central Bank of Nigeria mystery shopping exercise, N149.25m for compliance-related issues and bank email returns, and N18m following a foreign exchange examination.
Bank customer alleges N2.59m theft from two GTBank accounts
-
News3 years agoRoger Federer’s Shock as DNA Results Reveal Myla and Charlene Are Not His Biological Children
-
Opinions5 years agoTHE PLIGHT OF FARIDA
-
News2 years agoFAILED COUP IN BURKINA FASO: HOW TRAORÉ NARROWLY ESCAPED ASSASSINATION PLOT AMID FOREIGN INTERFERENCE CLAIMS
-
Opinions5 years agoPOLICE CHARGE ROOMS, A MINTING PRESS
-
News3 years agoEYN: Rev. Billi, Distortion of History, and The Living Tamarind Tree
-
ACADEMICS3 years agoA History of Biu” (2015) and The Lingering Bura-Pabir Question (1)
-
Columns3 years agoArmy University Biu: There is certain interest, but certainly not from Borno.
-
Politics1 year ago2027: Why Hon. Midala Balami Must Go, as Youths in Hawul and Asikira/Uba Federal Constituency Reject ₦500,000 as Sallah Gift
