News
SOUTHERN BORNO STATE WHERE RELIGION AND ETHNICITY TEAR AN OPPRESSED PEOPLE APART.By:A.G.Abubakar
SOUTHERN BORNO STATE WHERE RELIGION AND ETHNICITY TEAR AN OPPRESSED PEOPLE APART.
By:A.G.Abubakar
The Ubuntu which is a Zulu philosophy of unity of purpose doesn’t seem to hold among the ethnic nationalities of Southern Borno. The philosophy is rendered as “Umuntu, Ngumuntu, Ngabuntu” which literally translates as “i am because we are”, or put differently to mean ” a person is a person through other people “. The import of both underscore the importace of unity of purpose among people in forging progress. This spirit of togetherness has but vanished among the people, as they pull in different directions, at a time they needed to turn the socioeconomic and political fortunes of the region around. No thanks, to ethno-religious factors and the inequitable manner succussive state governments treated the zone.
The present version of Borno State was created in 1991 after Yobe was curved out. Before then it was part of the defunct North Eastern State, comprising today’s Adamawa, Bauchi, Taraba, Gombe and Yobe states. The North East State was highly diverse in terms of faiths and ethnicnationalities. Maiduguri, the then state capital was a laid back and accomodating metropolis. Non of the ethnic groups namely; Fulani, Hausa, Bachama, Mumuye, Tera, Mandara, Tangale, Marghi, Bolewa, Babur, Bura Chibok ,etc tried to lord it on each other.
The Kanuri power was diluted. Across the state too Muslims, Christians and the various ethnic groups that made up the state (NE) lived in peace with minimal distrust. People like Minso Gadzama, Azi Nyako, Bello Kirfi, Abubakar Umar, Maina Waziri, Ibrahim Biu, Gujbawu, Yerima Balla, Shehu Awak, etc were collectively united in moving the NE state forward.
A spirit that resonated with Borno state’s current mantra thus becoming the “Home of Peace and Hospitality”; a mantra, now turned on it’s head, so it seems. Three decades down the line Borno State had turned out to be one of the most inequitable in the Nigerian federation. The state as configured in 1991 gave the muslim Kanuri absolute dominance that literally made smaller ethnic groups and the Christian religion punching bags. With a reduced surface area the Kanuri is able to exert absolute political and economic control over the rest with impunity. This, they do through both tacit and overt policies including divide and rule along fault lines such as ethnic, religious differences and cultural affinity.
The overt discriminatory policies started with the late Musa Dagash’s circulars nos.CSC/2/89, Ref: BO/CSC/459/5.2/1 of 17th April 1989 and CSC/3/89, Ref:BO/CSC/459/S.15/5 of 21st April 1989 respectively. The import of the circulars was to place embargo on the recruitment and promotion of Southern Borno indigenes in the the Borno State service. Their crime was that they came from the wrong region, besides they were considered “too many” in the civil service which called for decimation. Dagash then was incharge of the State’s Civil Service Commission.
The discriminatory practice didn’t stop there, as successive governments in the state found it difficult to equitably include Southern Borno people in state nominations for Federal appointments. People from the zone have to struggle on their own or through friends to secure places. Nominations for appointments as ambassadors, Chairmen and/or board memberships are exclusive preserve of the Kanuri.The attrition or the blocking tactics didn’t end with appointive opportunities; this has been extended to religion especially the non Muslim folks. Government’s posture towards the non Muslim community in state has become a source of concern for lovers of the state and her future. Today, the state would find it expidient to train Arabic teachers but not CRK.
Government too could provide state resources in support of mosques/Islamiyya but did so minimally for non Muslim worship centers. And in matters of career progression, non Muslim folks in the state civil service are not having it easy, compared to their Muslim counterparts from the same South. These and many more are sure recipes for instability, given the centrality of religion and ethnic identity in the lives of our people. Unfortunately in their quest for redress the Christian faithfuls tend to elienate the very southern Borno Muslim brothers, they should ordinarily join hands with, through omissions or commissions. First they overlook historical realities. Realities of inter and intra ethnic interactions across Southern Borno and indeed the Kanuri nation. Second, Islamic values have a binding characteristics that shape perception among the faithfuls. They see themselves as one Ummah. Thus it becomes naive to expect equal levels of reaction or despair among the Muslim and Christian groups in Southern Borno regarding the government’s widespread inequalities.
For a fact, Muslims from the South may not be faring any better but the religion and cultural affinity have numbing effect, especially when they stretch far back in history. The relationships among some of the groups predate the 19th century Islam (in action) and Christianity in parts of Borno during the 1920s. Early Churches include the CBM established in Garkida and then Waka in 1927 under the defunct Borno province. was in 1923 and came to Waka in 1927.
It is therefore obvious that the feeling may not be the same in terms of intensity. In specific terms, the Marghi (Damboa), the Mandara, the Babur enclave of Babur-Bura, the Tera, and the Fulani (in their midst) may feel less grudge towards the Kanuri. Not so good a development but that is the reality. Realities that should be born in mind in building a united front in the South in checkmating the powers that be, from the continued exploitation of this fault lines. The reality of Southern Borno is not a black and white issue which calls for contextual appreciation of the challenges. Internal wrangling, name calling and aggression as a strategy can only be counterproductive. Referring to each other as being slaves to the status quo, sycophants, sell outs, ignorant, enemies of progress for not sharing a stand amounts to shooting oneself in the foot. Worse still, the defeatist attempt by some elite Christians to railroad Borno South into the Middle Belt region.
The frustrations may be justified or even palpable, but it’s a defective strategy. For, it will solve one problem especially the Christian faithfuls but constitute a new challenge for their Muslim brothers (the unwilling co-travellers) in the new environment in all its complexities. The way forward is for the christian South to appreciate its relative size which is about 15 to 20 percent of the state population. It can not therefore force its way through.
The faithfuls should engage and educate/ engage the ethnic minority and Muslim brothers to collectively rise against marginalisation and uneven development in Borno State. Building such a consensus however requires being realistic and open, away from wishful thinking and blackmail. The current posture by some to the effect that ” you are either with us or against us” doesn’t help much. Peculiar problems born out of injustice should be presented and treated as such; and brought into sharper focus and context.
The battle requires numbers and a critical mass as such everyone counts.The Muslim and the Christian, the informed and the uninformed, the wise and the foolish, the enlightened and the unenlightened, the educated and the uneducated, all have a place. The reality is, they are not only in the same boat but are facing the same storm! They will have to depend on each other to prevail. Let’s all come clean. agbarewa@gmail.com
SOUTHERN BORNO STATE WHERE RELIGION AND ETHNICITY TEAR AN OPPRESSED PEOPLE APART.
By:A.G.Abubakar
News
S. Targets Nigeria’s Livestock Sector in Fresh Trade Push
S. Targets Nigeria’s Livestock Sector in Fresh Trade Push
By: Michael Mike
The United States has launched a fresh drive to deepen agricultural trade and investment with Nigeria, deploying American expertise, technology and private-sector partnerships to unlock opportunities in the country’s livestock industry.
The initiative, unveiled under the Freedom 250 programme of the U.S. Mission to Nigeria, signals a renewed push by Washington to expand two-way commercial relations with Africa’s largest economy, with livestock development emerging as a major area for cooperation.
The programme brought American livestock development expert, Dr. Gregg BeVier, to Nigeria from August 10 to 13 for a series of engagements with Nigerian policymakers, agribusiness leaders, young entrepreneurs and livestock-sector stakeholders.
BeVier’s mission centred on one of the critical challenges confronting Nigeria’s agricultural economy: how to raise livestock productivity through improved technology, animal husbandry, private investment and stronger links between producers and markets.

At the All-Africa Conference on Animal Agriculture in Abuja, the U.S. expert engaged officials of the Federal Ministry of Livestock Development and the Livestock Reforms and Implementation Committee on the potential of American private-sector partnerships to accelerate the transformation of Nigeria’s livestock industry.
The discussions were supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Foreign Agricultural Service, underscoring the commercial dimension of the new agricultural partnership.
BeVier joined American animal-husbandry companies at the U.S.-Nigeria Livestock and Feed Connect, a business-to-business platform designed to bring American and Nigerian companies together to explore partnerships, technology transfer and investment opportunities.
The initiative also took the conversation to young Nigerians, with BeVier engaging audiences through the network of American Spaces across Nigeria on opportunities for young people to participate in improving livestock productivity.
The U.S. Mission said the programme was designed to advance American prosperity by helping create a more favourable business environment in Nigeria, particularly in agriculture, while strengthening commercial ties between both countries.

The initiative forms part of the broader Commercial and Investment Partnership between Nigeria and the United States and reflects Washington’s growing emphasis on private-sector-led economic engagement.
For Nigeria, the renewed U.S. focus comes at a time when the livestock sector is increasingly viewed as central to food security, employment, rural development and the diversification of the economy away from dependence on oil.
Beyond livestock production itself, the partnership potentially opens opportunities across the wider agricultural value chain, including animal genetics, feed production, veterinary services, animal health, farm management, processing and agribusiness finance.
The U.S. Mission said the programme would also build on existing people-to-people initiatives, including the International Visitor Leadership Program (IVLP) and the Young African Leaders Initiative (YALI), while creating new networks that could lead to future Fulbright and IVLP opportunities focused on agricultural finance and trade.
The choice of livestock as a major area of engagement is significant given the scale and complexity of Nigeria’s agricultural market, where productivity gaps, limited access to modern technology and finance, animal health challenges and weak value-chain linkages have constrained the sector’s ability to meet rising domestic demand.
The American intervention is therefore positioned not merely as an exchange of expertise but as an attempt to connect Nigerian demand with American technology, investment and business capacity.
BeVier brings more than three decades of experience in livestock and agribusiness to the initiative. He is the Chief Operating Officer of ST Genetics and Chief Executive Officer of Fast Genetics and previously managed the livestock portfolio at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation as a Senior Program Officer.
He has also served in senior positions in major livestock and animal-health organisations, including as president of PIC and in leadership roles at Premium Standard Farms and Merial.
With academic qualifications spanning agricultural science, animal science, veterinary medicine and business administration from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, BeVier’s participation gives the initiative a strong commercial and technical dimension.
The U.S. Mission’s latest move comes against the backdrop of efforts by both Nigeria and the United States to expand economic relations beyond traditional areas of cooperation.
Rather than focusing solely on aid or development assistance, the Freedom 250 initiative places trade, investment, private enterprise and technical expertise at the centre of the relationship.
For Nigeria’s livestock industry, the immediate challenge will be converting the new diplomatic and business engagement into actual investments, technology partnerships and measurable productivity gains.
But with American companies now being directly connected to Nigerian businesses and policymakers, the initiative could mark the beginning of a new phase in bilateral agricultural relations — one in which livestock becomes a significant bridge between U.S. commercial interests and Nigeria’s drive for food security, economic diversification and agricultural modernisation.
The U.S. Mission said the programme is intended to create lasting networks for future engagement, suggesting that the four-day programme could serve as an entry point for broader American participation in Nigeria’s agricultural economy.
For Washington, the opportunity is commercial. For Nigeria, the stakes are considerably bigger: transforming livestock from a largely underperforming agricultural subsector into a more productive, technology-driven industry capable of generating jobs, attracting investment and strengthening food security.
S. Targets Nigeria’s Livestock Sector in Fresh Trade Push
News
Nigeria Risks Missing China’s $18bn Export Window, Experts Warn
Nigeria Risks Missing China’s $18bn Export Window, Experts Warn
By: Michael Mike
Nigeria risks squandering a potentially transformative opening in the Chinese market unless it urgently fixes its production, processing and export capacity, stakeholders warned on Friday as China’s new zero-tariff regime opened a fresh $18 billion trade window between both countries.
The warning came against the backdrop of China’s decision to remove tariffs on imports from African countries with diplomatic relations with Beijing, a move that Nigerian officials and trade experts said could dramatically expand the country’s access to one of the world’s largest consumer markets.
Chinese Ambassador to Nigeria, Yu Dunhai, disclosed in Abuja that bilateral trade between Nigeria and China reached $18 billion in the first half of 2026, while Chinese imports from Nigeria jumped by 80 per cent to $2.3 billion following the implementation of the zero-tariff policy on May 1.
But rather than celebrate the figures, speakers at an international seminar on the policy challenged Nigeria to confront the structural weaknesses that could prevent the country from turning preferential access into sustained export earnings, industrial growth and jobs.
The seminar, organised by the Centre for China Studies, brought together senior government officials, lawmakers, diplomats, manufacturers, farmers, exporters and academics to examine the implications of the Chinese initiative for Nigeria and Africa.
The emerging consensus was stark: China has opened the door, but Nigeria must first produce what the Chinese market wants, in the required quantity and quality.
Yu said the policy had already produced tangible benefits, with Nigeria recording significant savings on export tariffs.
He cited Nigerian sesame exports, saying every 100 tonnes now saves about $11,000 in tariff costs, while the country’s annual export of 7,000 tonnes of cattle bone granules could save nearly $450,000.
A single 23,000-tonne shipment of Nigerian liquefied propane, he added, saved approximately $300,000 in tax on the first day of the new regime.

Yet, the ambassador made clear that tariff elimination alone would not guarantee Nigerian success in the Chinese market.
“Meeting Chinese market standards and ensuring reliable supply volumes are essential for long-term success,” he said.
He urged Nigerian producers to improve quality, strengthen supply chains and move beyond the export of unprocessed commodities.
China, he said, was prepared to support Nigeria with technology, equipment and technical expertise, including partnerships for industrial parks and local processing.
The Director of the Centre for China Studies, Charles Onunaiju, delivered perhaps the strongest warning of the day, saying the preferential access could become another missed opportunity if Nigeria failed to reform its production and trade systems.
“Zero-tariff treatment for products coming from Africa is only the starting point, it’s not the finish line,” he said.
For Nigeria, the challenge is particularly significant because the country has repeatedly struggled to translate preferential access to foreign markets into large-scale export growth.
Onunaiju said African countries must address structural constraints, harmonise standards, improve customs procedures and strengthen regional integration under the African Continental Free Trade Area.
He argued that the Chinese initiative could provide Africa with the opportunity to become a major global manufacturing base, but only if countries build productive capacity rather than remain suppliers of raw materials.
“The opportunity of becoming the next workshop of the world is in Africa,” he said.
The Federal Government also used the forum to push its industrialisation agenda, insisting that Nigeria must stop treating the export of raw materials as the end point of economic activity.
The Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Dunoma Ahmed, said Nigeria’s central question should not simply be how much it could sell to China but how much value it could retain domestically.
“Our natural resources must become the starting point, not the end point, of economic activity,” he said.

He called for crude oil to feed petrochemical and downstream industries, agricultural commodities to support agro-processing and manufacturing, and solid minerals to drive mineral processing and industrial production.
“In other words, we must transition from exporting resources to exporting value,” he said.
Ahmed said Nigeria was seeking Chinese and other international investments that would produce factories, processing plants, technology centres, logistics networks and skilled employment.
For Nigeria, agriculture could become the biggest test of whether the Chinese policy delivers a structural change in exports.
The Minister of State for Agriculture and Food Security, Senator Aliyu Abdullahi, said the country had enormous opportunities in processed cassava, rice, spices, shea products, hibiscus, cashew, soybean products, fruits and vegetables.
But he warned that Nigeria could not expect to dominate the Chinese market by simply shipping more raw commodities.
“The question before us, therefore, is not ‘Can Nigeria export more?’ The question should be ‘Can Nigeria export better?’” he said.
He listed productivity, processing capacity, logistics, quality assurance, traceability, financing, storage and compliance with international standards as critical areas requiring urgent attention.
The minister said the government was expanding agro-processing through the Special Agro-Processing Zones programme, with projects launched or under development in Kaduna, Cross River, Ogun and Gombe states.
He also disclosed that a mechanisation programme involving 2,000 Belarusian tractors and equipment was being rolled out to boost agricultural production.
Chairman of the occasion and former Director-General of the National Institute for Policy and Strategic Studies, Jonathan Juma, urged Nigeria to learn from its experience under the African Growth and Opportunity Act, warning against allowing another preferential trade arrangement to pass without building the capacity to exploit it.
He challenged policymakers to look beyond Nigeria’s natural endowments and determine how they could be converted into competitive exports.
“Nigeria is a place where you can drop a seed, and without much care, harvest at the end of the day. What can we do with this? What can we offer the world? What can we offer to China?” he asked.
The warning was echoed by the Director overseeing the Office of the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Budget and Economic Planning, Dr Samson Ebimaro, who said Nigeria must strengthen infrastructure, logistics, financing, technology transfer and compliance with international standards.
He identified agriculture, agro-processing, solid minerals, manufacturing, leather and the creative industries as sectors capable of benefiting from the Chinese market.
The Chairman, House Committee on Nigeria-China Relations, Hon. Ja’afaru Yakubu, meanwhile, called for the removal of visa bottlenecks affecting Nigerian traders travelling to China.
He said easier movement of Nigerian businesspeople would enable more traders to establish direct relationships with Chinese buyers and expand the country’s participation in the market.
Yakubu said the National Assembly would continue engaging the Chinese Embassy on the issue, describing business mobility as an important component of deeper trade relations.
With China-Africa trade reaching a record $207 billion in the first half of 2026, the scale of the opportunity is significant.
But the Abuja seminar exposed the central dilemma confronting Nigeria: tariff barriers may have been removed, but production barriers remain.
For Nigeria, therefore, the real race is no longer simply to secure access to China.
It is to build the factories, farms, processing plants, standards, logistics systems and export capacity needed to ensure that when Chinese buyers open their doors, Nigeria has something competitive to sell.
Nigeria Risks Missing China’s $18bn Export Window, Experts Warn
News
Nestlé, FG Launch Nationwide Campaign Against Unsafe Water Michael Olugbode in Abuja
Nestlé, FG Launch Nationwide Campaign Against Unsafe Water Michael Olugbode in Abuja
By: Michael Mike
The Federal Government and Nestlé Nigeria Plc have launched a nationwide water quality advocacy campaign aimed at tackling unsafe drinking water and taking water safety education directly to communities across the country.
The initiative, being implemented in collaboration with the Organised Private Sector in Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (OPS-WASH), seeks to shift Nigeria’s water conversation from mere access and availability to the quality, safety and sustainability of water consumed by citizens.
The campaign was unveiled at a National Training of Trainers (ToT) workshop on the Water Quality Handbook, bringing together government officials, technical experts and other stakeholders to build a network of personnel capable of cascading water safety knowledge to states, local government areas and communities.
Representing the Minister of Water Resources and Sanitation, Engr. Prof. Joseph Utsev, at the event, Director Habu Jamilu said Nigeria could no longer afford fragmented interventions in water quality management, stressing the need for a unified national approach.
He described the Water Quality Handbook as a definitive technical guide designed to establish standard procedures across the water quality value chain.
According to him, the handbook covers source protection, household water handling, water testing, household water treatment, climate-related water quality challenges and channels for reporting water quality concerns to relevant authorities.
Utsev said the training represented a critical step towards converting the technical provisions of the handbook into practical knowledge that could be replicated across the country.
He urged participants to maximise the technical sessions and practical exercises, noting that the success of the national campaign would ultimately depend on effective transfer of knowledge from trained personnel to communities.
Speaking on the initiative, the National Coordinator and Global Head of OPS-WASH Nigeria, Dr. Nicholas Igwe, who represented Nestlé Nigeria at the event, said the company was deliberately broadening its approach to water stewardship beyond access to include quality, governance and sustainability.
Igwe disclosed that under Nestlé Nigeria’s Water Regeneration Project, the company had committed to providing about 270,000 cubic metres of water annually to 16 communities in one catchment area, while another catchment area covering eight communities was expected to receive about 130,000 cubic metres.
The combined intervention amounts to about 400,000 cubic metres of water annually, underscoring the scale of the company’s stated commitment to water regeneration and community development.
He said the project rests on four key pillars — water access, water quality, governance and sustainability — with the objective of ensuring that communities do not merely have water but have access to water that meets acceptable quality standards.
“People should not only have access to water; they should also understand and benefit from water that meets acceptable quality standards,” Igwe said.
He explained that community participation was central to the project, with communities involved at different stages, from design through implementation, in order to promote ownership and ensure that the benefits could be sustained beyond the intervention period.
The project also incorporates water harvesting initiatives aimed at supporting agricultural activities and contributing to food security.
Igwe said the Water Quality Handbook, launched in April 2026 with the support of the Federal Ministry of Water Resources and Sanitation, was designed to be more than a policy document.
He said its real value would be measured by its ability to reach ordinary Nigerians and equip them with practical knowledge about the water they consume.
“The objective is for people to know exactly what they drink and understand how water quality affects their health and even the economy,” he said.
According to him, the trainers being developed through the workshop would take the knowledge contained in the handbook to different states, local government areas and communities.
They would educate residents on the health and economic consequences of poor water quality, appropriate household practices and the importance of consuming safe water.
Igwe also challenged private-sector organisations to move beyond interventions at the federal level and ensure that their investments translate into measurable benefits for communities.
He called on state governors and state-level water and sanitation institutions to take ownership of the campaign and support its implementation when it reaches their respective states.
The training featured technical sessions designed to equip participants with practical knowledge of water quality management.
A goodwill message was delivered by the President of the Association of Professional Women Engineers in Nigeria (APWEN), Engr. Chinreye Igwegbe, who joined other stakeholders in advocating stronger professional and institutional collaboration in water management.
The partnership between the Federal Ministry of Water Resources and Sanitation, OPS-WASH and Nestlé Nigeria signals an increasing recognition that Nigeria’s water challenge extends beyond providing sources of supply.
The emerging priority is ensuring that the water reaching Nigerian households is safe, tested, properly handled and sustainable.
For millions of Nigerians who depend on vulnerable water sources, the success of the campaign could therefore determine whether access to water translates into genuine protection of public health — or merely access to water that may still pose risks.
Nestlé, FG Launch Nationwide Campaign Against Unsafe Water Michael Olugbode in Abuja
-
News2 years agoRoger Federer’s Shock as DNA Results Reveal Myla and Charlene Are Not His Biological Children
-
Opinions4 years agoTHE PLIGHT OF FARIDA
-
News1 year agoFAILED COUP IN BURKINA FASO: HOW TRAORÉ NARROWLY ESCAPED ASSASSINATION PLOT AMID FOREIGN INTERFERENCE CLAIMS
-
News2 years agoEYN: Rev. Billi, Distortion of History, and The Living Tamarind Tree
-
Opinions5 years agoPOLICE CHARGE ROOMS, A MINTING PRESS
-
ACADEMICS2 years agoA History of Biu” (2015) and The Lingering Bura-Pabir Question (1)
-
Columns2 years agoArmy University Biu: There is certain interest, but certainly not from Borno.
-
Politics1 year ago2027: Why Hon. Midala Balami Must Go, as Youths in Hawul and Asikira/Uba Federal Constituency Reject ₦500,000 as Sallah Gift
