Connect with us

News

THE NIGERIA POLICE: AN INSTITUTION OF SERIOUS CONCERN

Published

on

THE NIGERIA POLICE: AN INSTITUTION OF SERIOUS CONCERN

A Nine-Year Search For Truth . JUNE 2017 – JULY 2026 – AND STILL UNRESOLVED

By: Mrs Nnenna John-Anozie

Following my husband’s abduction in 2017, the police officers completely cut off every means of access to him. I could neither see him nor hear from him,and despite repeated efforts to establish his whereabouts and ensure his well being and safety, I was denied access to him. The police also failed to charge him before a court with any offence. Faced with the authorities refusal to disclose his whereabouts,their denial of access to him ,and their failure to produce him before a court ,I was left with no option but to institute an action for the enforcement of his fundamental rights at the High Court of Anambra State ,Idemili Judicial Division,Holden at Ogidi, being Suit No.HID/MISC. 47/2017, filed on 3 July 2017 before HIS LORDSHIP HON. JUSTICE .V.N.AGBATA.

On 24 July 2017,the Honourable Court presided over by His Lordship, Hon.Justice V.N. Agbata made an order directing as follows:
(a) That the Police are hereby ordered to charge my husband to court if a prima case is made against him or release him on bail.
(b) In the alternative,the Police are ordered to produce him in court on the next adjourned date of this suit and show cause why he can not be charged to court or released on bail.
Suit was adjourned to 19 September 2017 .
The Police did not comply,instead they subsequently put forward the claim that my husband had died.

Because this was never accompanied by the production of his body or any satisfactory account of his death,I returned to court and filed a motion on 20 October 2017,and prayed for an order of court compelling the police to produce his corpse for the purposes of a joint autopsy by the Government Doctor and Doctor chosen by his family,and thereafter ,for the police to release the said corpse to his family for a proper and decent burial .

On 16 April 2018, the court ordered the police to release the corpse to the members of his family for a burial since he was not charged and convicted of any offence.

Regrettably,however ,that order,too was not complied with.

Thus began a long and painful pattern: court orders were made,petitions were submitted ,investigations were initiated,and yet the fundamental question remained unanswered –

What happened to Chukwuemaka John Anozie ?

Upon realizing that nothing will come out of the matter in Anambra State,having made several efforts that proved abortive.I went to Force Headquarters Abuja and petitioned the Inspector General of Police seeking his intervention and thorough investigation to unravel the truth about my husband’s whereabouts and what happened to him?

What the Police Investigation Revealed

Following the petition to the IGP,an investigation was constituted and conducted by the X-Squad Unit at Force Headquarters .

That investigation produced findings and identified Sergeant Emeana Uzochukwu and Anthony Obiozor Ikechukwu as principal suspects in connection with the enforced disappearance of my husband.

Following the investigation,the Legal Department at Force Headquarters prepared a legal advise and charges, with the approval of the then DIG ,Force Criminal Investigation Department (FCID),Anthony Michael Ogbizi,in 2020.

Yet,despite these investigative findings,the officers identified in connection with my husband’s abduction and enforced disappearance were not charged or prosecuted.

There was another deeply troubling discovery .

A few days after my husband’s abduction,withdrawals began to be made from his bank account using his ATM card.The withdrawals continued until the account was completely depleted.

In other words,while my husband remained missing, our family properties had been taken,two vehicles had been removed from our home,a briefcase containing money ,important family documents, certificates and international passports had been taken,and money had been withdrawn from his bank account until the account was completely depleted

And for years ,even the case file containing the records of the investigation into his disappearance could not be accounted for.

It was not until July 2026, nine years after his disappearance ,that the case file was finally brought out and reportedly forwarded to the Attorney General of the Federation.

Yet,despite the investigation,the identification of suspects,the existence of court orders,preparation of charges and legal advise, no prosecution had taken place.

SEEKING JUSTICE : My Visit To The National Human Rights Commission And The End SARS Judicial Panel Proceedings in Abuja.

On 9 Oct 2020, I visited the NHRC in Abuja and met with the Chairman ,Mr Tony Ojukwu SAN. I narrated my ordeal to him and also lodged my petition with the commission.

After my visit,the End SARS protests subsequently commenced and led to the constitution of a panel of inquiry by the Federal Government to address related human rights violations.

Between 2020 and 2022, I appeared before the End SARS Judicial Panel of Inquiry in Abuja, hoping that the panel would finally provide a forum through which the truth about my husband’s disappearance could emerge.

The panel issued several orders directing the police to ensure the appearance of officers who were respondents in the proceedings and who had been implicated in my husband’s enforced disappearance .

They repeatedly failed to appear .

The proceedings were adjourned repeatedly -no fewer than twelve times over the course of two years .

The police failed to summon the officers ,and none of them appeared before the panel throughout the proceedings .

The panel also issued directives requiring my husband to be produced or an explanation to be given concerning his whereabouts. Those directives were not complied with.

The Panel further ordered Mr.Ochogwu, then CP Legal ,to personally appear and ensure the production of my husband’s case file and other documents relating to the investigation. The Panel reiterated this order on five separate occasions during the adjourned sittings, yet that order was not complied with .

Eventually,after two years of proceedings ,the panel concluded its work without resolving the central questions surrounding my husband’s disappearance .

Actions Taken After the Panel’s Closure To Continue My Quest For Justice.

With the matter still unresolved ,another petition was submitted to the Office of the Inspector General of Police on 22 November,2023 through Falana and Falana Chambers .

Following that petition,the Office of the Inspector General, directed that the matter be reopened for further investigation ,not only into my husband’s abduction and disappearance involving officers of the Nigeria Police Force ,but also into the disappearance of the case file from the Legal Department .

The matter was subsequently reassigned to Mr.Chinedu of the IGP Monitoring Team for further investigation.
Again,however,requests for relevant documents and investigative records were not complied with, and the matter once more went dormant.
I again wrote a letter through my lawyer Vincent Adodo, dated 8th April 2025, to the Inspector General of Police,requesting, pursuant to the Freedom of information Act 2011,the release of the case file and reports of several investigations concerning my husband’s disappearance ,both to me and to the Attorney General of the Federation.
The Inspector General of Police Kayode Egbetokun refused to release the requested documents.
This refusal persisted despite the fact that investigations had already been conducted ,a legal advise and charges had been prepared, and a subsequent judgment of the Federal High Court ordered the release of the relevant documents.

I was therefore left with no option but to return to court.

The Federal High Court Judgment

I subsequently instituted Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/865/2025 Nnenna Anozie v. Inspector General of Police, before the Federal High Court ,Abuja seeking among other reliefs,an order of Mandamus compelling the IGP to release the certified true copies of the investigation records and legal advise concerning my husband’s abduction and disappearance .

The suit was heard before Hon. Justice Binta Nyako.
In the suit , I also sought an order directing that the indicted officers be handed over to the Attorney General of the Federation for prosecution before the appropriate court..

Despite being served with the court processes and hearing notices,the police failed to appear to defend the case.

On September 24,2025 ,Hon. Justice Binta Nyako of the Federal High Court,Abuja delivered judgment in Suit No.FHC/ABJ/CS/865/2025 in my favour, granting the reliefs sought and awarding ₦2Million in compensation for the violation of my right to information .

At that point ,I believed that after eight years of struggle,the judgment would finally open the door to accountability and access to the records concerning my husband’s disappearance

I was Wrong

Despite being served with the judgment and the relevant orders ,the Inspector General of Police did not comply.

Following the continued non-compliance by the police under the then IGP Kayode Egbetokun, my lawyer caused Form 48-Notice of Consequences of Disobedience to Court Order and Form 49-Notice of Committal to the Correctional Centre to be issued and served on the IGP.

Notwithstanding the judgment of the Court,and steps taken to enforce it ,the order remained unimplemented until the removal of the then Inspector-General of police from office on 24 February 2026.

Following the appointment of the present Inspector-General of Police Olatunji Rilwan Disu, contempt proceedings were initiated in respect of the continued non-compliance with the judgment.

Then,on July 24, 2026, during subsequent court proceedings ,I was informed by my lawyer that the police had filed a Notice of Compliance stating that my husband’s case file and related documents had finally been forwarded to the Attorney-General of the Federation.

After nine years, the case file had finally moved.

But my husband is still missing and his whereabouts remain unknown.

The File may have moved ,But Justice has not.

The Police’s stated forwarding of the case file to the Attorney General of the Federation has not brought this matter to a resolution .

The Office of the Attorney General of the Federation has,to date ,taken no action on the cases file reportedly forwarded to it.
I have therefore been placed in the extraordinary position of having to pursue a case concerning my missing husband while being denied access to the very investigative records generated in that case.
And so,after nine years of petitions ,investigations, court orders,panel proceedings ,legal representations and litigation ,the questions with which this journey began remain the same:

The passage of time has not diminished the pain,it has deepened it.

Emeana Uzochukwu and Anthony Obiozor Ikechukwu owe me, my children, our families, and the Nigerian public answers about Chukwuemeka John Anozie’s whereabouts and what happened to him, and must be brought forth to provide answers.

I want my children to have answers about their father.

They have grown up without the presence of their father and without the certainty of knowing what happened to him

The Nigeria Police Force bears responsibility for accounting for the investigation into my husband’s enforced disappearance, the handling and custody of the case file, the actions and omissions of its officers following his disappearance .

The rule of law must be upheld ,and the law must take its course

Mrs Nnenna John-Anozie

THE NIGERIA POLICE: AN INSTITUTION OF SERIOUS CONCERN

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

EU, Nigeria Expand Cooperation on Migration, Security with €112m Support

Published

on

EU, Nigeria Expand Cooperation on Migration, Security with €112m Support

By: Michael Mike

The European Union (EU) and Nigeria have reaffirmed their commitment to strengthening cooperation on migration management, security and regional stability, with the EU committing a combined €112 million to support migration-related and security initiatives in the country.

The commitment was highlighted during a visit by the European Commissioner for Internal Affairs and Migration, Mr Magnus Brunner, to Abuja on Tuesday, where he held high-level meetings with key Nigerian government officials.

Brunner met with the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu; Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Mr Lateef Fagbemi (SAN); Minister of Interior, Hon. Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo; and Minister of Humanitarian Affairs and Poverty Reduction, Dr Bernard Doro.

The EU said €66 million had recently been allocated to fund new migration-related projects, while another €26 million would support security interventions, including efforts to curb the proliferation of small arms and drug trafficking.

It also disclosed that it had adopted its first bilateral assistance measure to Nigeria under the European Peace Facility, committing €20 million to support the country’s counterterrorism efforts.

The development comes against the backdrop of growing cooperation between Nigeria and European institutions on migration management, particularly following the signing of the EU-Nigeria Readmission Agreement.

According to the EU, the partnership has recorded improvements in recent years through collaboration between Nigerian authorities and European agencies, including Europol, Eurojust and Frontex.

Brunner said the growing relationship reflected the importance Europe attached to Nigeria as a strategic partner in Africa.

“Nigeria is a key partner for Europe, and our ties are steadily growing stronger. Together we are turning dialogue into action: more security, better migration management, joining forces to bring results.

“We are turning the huge potential of our partnership into mutual benefit,” he said.

The EU said the visit also provided an opportunity to review the broader relationship between both sides, advance cooperation on shared priorities and explore areas of engagement beyond migration and security.

It noted that Nigeria and the EU shared a commitment to multilateralism and a rules-based international order, adding that their partnership had continued to expand in scope.

The relationship has gained further momentum following the eighth EU-Nigeria Ministerial Meeting held in Abuja in March, with the participation of the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Kaja Kallas.

The EU also highlighted the role of Team Europe, comprising the EU and its member states, in implementing its Global Gateway investment strategy in Nigeria through projects spanning several sectors.

It said Nigeria’s strategic position in West Africa and its wider regional influence made it an important partner in advancing regional economic cooperation, security, migration management and trade.

The commissioner’s visit is expected to further consolidate the partnership and lay the groundwork for deepe

EU, Nigeria Expand Cooperation on Migration, Security with €112m Support

Continue Reading

News

DSS Intercept Weapons Shipment from Niger Republic, Recover 21 AK-47 Rifles, Four PKT Machine Guns in Sokoto

Published

on

DSS Intercept Weapons Shipment from Niger Republic, Recover 21 AK-47 Rifles, Four PKT Machine Guns in Sokoto

By: Zagazola Makama

The Department Of State Security Service (DSS) have intercepted a large consignment of weapons and ammunition allegedly being smuggled from the Niger Republic to armed bandits operating in north-western Nigeria.

The interception, which took place on Tuesday, November 10, at Dawakawa in Goronyo Local Government Area of Sokoto State, followed a security operation targeting suspected weapons trafficking networks across the Nigeria-Niger border.

Security sources said the suspected smugglers were allegedly attempting to transport the weapons into Nigeria using camels, apparently exploiting remote routes and difficult terrain to evade security surveillance.

The operation led to the recovery of 21 AK-47 rifles, four PKT machine guns and 825 magazines.

The interception represents a significant disruption of an alleged cross-border weapons supply network suspected of facilitating the operations of armed bandit groups in the North-West.

The use of camels to transport the weapons highlights the increasingly unconventional methods employed by criminal networks to move arms and ammunition across porous border corridors.

The development also underscores the importance of sustained intelligence surveillance coordinated border security operations in preventing the movement of illicit weapons from neighbouring countries into Nigeria.

The recovered weapons are expected to provide security agencies with valuable leads towards identifying the suppliers, transporters and intended recipients of the consignment.

Zagazola report that several border communities along the Nigeria–Niger Republic frontier have emerged as vulnerable corridors for cross-border arms trafficking, bandit movements and other criminal activities, raising concerns over the security of Nigeria’s North-West.

The affected areas include Illela, Sabon Birni, Isa, Gudu and Tangaza in Sokoto State; Jibia, Kaita, Mai’Adua and Kongolam in Katsina; Zurmi and Shinkafi in Zamfara; as well as Kamba and Arewa Dandi in Kebbi State.

Security concerns around these border regions are linked to porous boundaries, informal trading networks and difficult-to-monitor rural terrain, which criminal networks like Bandits, Lakurawa and Boko Haram exploit for illicit activities.

The development reinforces the need for enhanced border surveillance, intelligence-sharing and coordinated operations to dismantle cross-border weapons supply networks.

Security agencies must also target the financiers and suppliers behind the trafficking networks rather than focusing solely on couriers.

DSS Intercept Weapons Shipment from Niger Republic, Recover 21 AK-47 Rifles, Four PKT Machine Guns in Sokoto

Continue Reading

News

INEC Proposes Democratic Freedoms Compact to Safeguard 2027 Elections

Published

on

INEC Proposes Democratic Freedoms Compact to Safeguard 2027 Elections

…NHRC warns of political intimidation, arbitrary arrests, hate speech; EU pledges support for protection of civic space

By: Michael Mike

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has proposed a Democratic Freedoms Compact to safeguard fundamental human rights, protect civic space and strengthen public confidence ahead of the 2027 general election.

The proposed compact is designed to guarantee freedom of expression, association and political participation, promote inclusiveness, ensure electoral transparency and accountability, and prevent violence, intimidation and other human rights violations throughout the electoral process.

INEC Chairman, Prof. Joash Amupitan, SAN, unveiled the proposal in a keynote address delivered on his behalf by Dr Hassan Umar at the 2026 Civil Society and Human Rights Defenders Forum on the State of Human Rights in Abuja on Wednesday.

The forum, organised by the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) in collaboration with the European Union (EU), was themed, “Protecting Human Rights in Civic and Political Spaces in the 2027 Elections.”

Amupitan said the credibility of the 2027 elections would be determined not only by the conduct of voting and collation of results but also by the extent to which Nigerians could freely express their opinions, associate, campaign and participate in the political process without fear, discrimination or violence.

He warned that regular elections alone could not sustain democracy if citizens were denied the freedom to express dissenting views, organise, criticise government policies and hold public institutions accountable.

To address these concerns, the INEC chairman said the proposed compact would establish a framework for institutional conduct built around six critical commitments: protection of fundamental freedoms, inclusive participation, transparent elections, accountability for human rights violations, peaceful political competition and constructive engagement among stakeholders.

He called for stronger collaboration among INEC, the NHRC, security agencies, civil society organisations and the media to monitor, document and respond to violations before, during and after the elections.

Amupitan reaffirmed the commission’s commitment to conducting credible elections, ensuring equal treatment of political parties and candidates, strengthening transparency and promoting inclusive participation.

On the contentious issue of electronic transmission of election results, he maintained that the Electoral Act 2026 provided for electronic transmission, while INEC had developed guidelines to address possible technical and communication challenges.

He urged political parties, civil society organisations and other stakeholders to familiarise themselves with the commission’s guidelines and regulations to avoid misinterpretation of the procedures governing result transmission.

The INEC chairman also placed responsibility on security agencies to protect voters, candidates, election officials, observers and journalists, insisting that security personnel must operate professionally and impartially.

He said their presence at polling units and other electoral locations should reassure citizens and create a safe environment for participation rather than generate fear or intimidation.

Earlier, Executive Secretary of the NHRC, Chief Anthony Ojukwu, warned that Nigeria’s democratic space was facing mounting challenges that required urgent intervention as the country approached the 2027 general election.

Ojukwu identified political intimidation, arbitrary arrests, harassment of journalists and human rights defenders, hate speech, restrictions on civic participation and the exclusion of vulnerable groups as threats capable of undermining the credibility of the electoral process.

He said the commission convened the forum at a defining moment in Nigeria’s democratic journey, with the presidential and National Assembly elections scheduled for January 16, 2027, and governorship and State Houses of Assembly elections to follow on February 6.

According to him, the timing was particularly significant because political campaigns were already gathering momentum across the country, making the protection of civic and political freedoms increasingly urgent.

He stressed that democracy was not sustained by elections alone but by the freedom citizens enjoyed between elections to speak without fear, assemble peacefully, associate without obstruction and choose their leaders without intimidation.

Citing Sections 14, 39 and 40 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, Ojukwu said sovereignty belonged to the Nigerian people, while constitutional guarantees protected freedom of expression, association and peaceful assembly.

He also referenced the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, which guarantees citizens the right to participate freely in the governance of their country.

The NHRC boss expressed concern that civil society organisations, journalists and human rights defenders continued to operate in an increasingly difficult environment characterised by harassment, arbitrary arrests and the potential misuse of laws, including provisions of the Cybercrimes Act.

He further raised concerns over political and voter intimidation, exclusionary nomination fees that could prevent women, young people and persons with disabilities from contesting elections, hate speech, incitement and the apparent absence of accountability for electoral offences.

Ojukwu warned that failure to prosecute electoral offenders could encourage impunity and embolden perpetrators to undermine the electoral process.

He disclosed that the commission had established a comprehensive human rights monitoring architecture to track political developments and election-related violations as campaigns intensified.

The mechanisms include a Human Rights Situation Dashboard, a human rights advisory and an Election Situation Room designed to monitor intimidation, suppression of political participation, harassment of journalists and other oversight actors, as well as violations of fundamental freedoms.

He said the commission was finalising an advisory on protecting political space and the right to participation in Nigeria, describing it as a flagship contribution to strengthening human rights protection during the forthcoming elections.

The advisory follows earlier interventions by the commission, including its February 2025 advisory on the protection of freedom of expression, which raised concerns about the interpretation and possible misuse of the Cybercrimes Act.

Ojukwu also disclosed that the commission was documenting violations, preparing cases for investigation and engaging INEC, security agencies, the National Peace Committee and other relevant institutions to strengthen accountability.

He said the NHRC’s Election Situation Room would remain operational throughout the electoral period, while election-focused dashboards and bulletins would be published regularly to provide information on human rights developments.

The commission, he added, would deploy monitors to identified hotspots and establish legal aid partnerships to respond to violations during and after the elections.

He announced that the forum would be transformed into a structured platform for sustained engagement between the commission and civil society organisations, with quarterly meetings, early-warning information sharing and rapid-response mechanisms.

According to him, the arrangement would facilitate coordination between the NHRC’s Situation Room and the Civil Society Election Situation Room, strengthen protection for individuals targeted for exercising their rights and ensure that stakeholders are held accountable for their commitments.

He said the forum would also adopt an outcome statement containing recommendations and a roadmap to guide its activities before, during and after the 2027 elections.

Ojukwu urged civil society organisations and human rights defenders to take ownership of the proposed framework, stressing that they were not spectators in the electoral process but essential partners in defending democracy.

He also acknowledged legislative efforts to strengthen the commission’s mandate and improve the legal protection of human rights defenders, expressing optimism that the reforms would create a more enabling environment for their work.

The NHRC executive secretary maintained that election-related violations must attract consequences, warning that the absence of accountability would weaken public confidence and encourage further abuses.

He said: “When elections go without violence, it is because of the work done long before polling day. Work that is sometimes invisible to the public.”

He added that the protection of democracy required collective responsibility and sustained commitment from government institutions, political parties, security agencies, civil society and international partners.

Also speaking, the EU Ambassador and Head of Delegation to Nigeria and ECOWAS, Gautier Mignot, reaffirmed the European Union’s commitment to supporting Nigeria’s democratic institutions and protecting civic and political freedoms ahead of the 2027 general election.

Mignot described the forum’s theme as timely, particularly against the backdrop of reports of election-related violence, hate speech, political intimidation and restrictions on citizens’ fundamental rights.

He warned that such incidents could erode public trust in state institutions and discourage citizens from participating in the electoral process.

The ambassador said free civic and political spaces, including independent media, peaceful assemblies, public forums and civil society organisations, were essential to ensuring credible, transparent and inclusive elections.

According to him, these spaces enable citizens to access information, debate public issues, scrutinise candidates and hold elected leaders and public institutions accountable without fear of censorship or retaliation.

He added that an open civic environment also allowed civil society organisations and active citizens to monitor election administration, track campaign promises and challenge government interference in the democratic process.

Mignot said weakening these safeguards could undermine citizens’ right to meaningful political participation and create opportunities for the suppression of opposition voices and manipulation of democratic rules.

He therefore urged all Nigerian stakeholders, including government institutions, political parties, civil society organisations and the media, to play their respective roles in ensuring a free, fair and credible electoral process.

The EU ambassador disclosed that the partnership with the NHRC had continued since 2024, when the first joint engagement provided a platform for human rights defenders to assess the state of human rights in Nigeria and develop collective responses to challenges confronting them.

He said the second engagement, held as part of activities marking the NHRC’s 30th anniversary, focused on reviewing the country’s human rights record over three decades and identifying emerging challenges requiring sustained intervention.

Mignot described the current forum as a continuation of the strategic partnership, adding that the EU was also preparing a new project with additional funding to deepen its collaboration with the commission.

He pledged that the EU delegation would carefully examine the recommendations and roadmap emerging from the forum and share them with its authorities and member states for further consideration.

He assured Nigeria that the EU and its member states would remain reliable partners in supporting democracy, good governance and the protection of human rights during what he described as a crucial period for the country’s democratic development.

In a goodwill message delivered on behalf of the Chairman of the Inter-Party Advisory Council (IPAC), Alhaji Yusuf Dantale, Prince Chinedu Obi urged political parties and their supporters to embrace issue-based campaigns, political tolerance and responsible communication.

IPAC cautioned against electoral violence, hate speech, voter suppression and political intimidation, stressing that political opponents must be regarded as competitors rather than enemies.

The council also advocated greater inclusion of women, young people and persons with disabilities in the electoral process, while urging security agencies and other relevant institutions to discharge their responsibilities with professionalism and impartiality.

Dantale said public confidence in the electoral system would ultimately depend on whether institutions could guarantee that votes counted and that Nigerians were able to exercise their democratic rights freely.

The forum brought together representatives of government institutions, diplomatic missions, political parties, civil society organisations, the media and human rights groups to assess the state of human rights in Nigeria and develop practical strategies for protecting civic and political freedoms ahead of the 2027 general election.

INEC Proposes Democratic Freedoms Compact to Safeguard 2027 Elections

Continue Reading

Trending

Verified by MonsterInsights