Connect with us

News

Violent Extremism in West Africa and the Need for a New Strategy to Peace

Published

on

Violent Extremism in West Africa and the Need for a New Strategy to Peace

By: Michael Mike

The persistent threat of violent extremism in West African states, exacerbated by groups such as Boko Haram, ISWAP, and Al-Qaeda, necessitates a reevaluation of current strategies. The complexity of this issue, driven by factors such as widespread poverty, weak governance, political instability, and limited educational opportunities, calls for a comprehensive and multifaceted approach.

This article by Senator Iroegbu and Maureen Okpe, highlights the urgent need for a new strategy that addresses the socio-economic and political root causes of extremism, emphasizing the importance of community engagement, economic development, and inclusive governance in building a more resilient and peaceful West Africa.

Rising Extremism and Its Drivers
Violent extremism has long plagued West African countries, with groups such as Boko Haram and its splinter groups like the Islamic State in West Africa Province (ISWAP) and Ansaru, bandits, herdsmen, and Al-Qaeda spreading terror and destabilizing the region. Despite ongoing efforts by governments, international organizations, and civil society groups, the threat of violent extremism continues to grow, underscoring the need for a new, comprehensive strategy to tackle this pressing issue. West Africa has experienced a steady rise in violent extremist groups, driven by a complex web of interrelated factors. Key among these are: widespread poverty, which creates a fertile ground for extremist groups to exploit vulnerable populations, offering financial incentives in exchange for allegiance.

Other factors include weak governance and political instability that undermine state authority, providing opportunities for extremist groups to gain influence and territory. Historical and ongoing ethnic conflicts also contribute to the cycle of violence, as extremist groups manipulate these divisions to further their agendas. This is added to the fact that limited educational opportunities leave many youths without prospects for a better future, making them susceptible to radicalization.

Consequently, extremist groups have adeptly exploited these vulnerabilities to recruit disenfranchised youth and spread their toxic ideologies. By capitalizing on socio-economic grievances and offering a sense of belonging and purpose, these groups have managed to swell their ranks, leading to a surge in violence and instability across the region.
To this end, the persistent threat posed by these violent extremism in West Africa calls for a reevaluation of current approaches and the development of a new, multifaceted strategy. This strategy must go beyond traditional military responses and address the underlying socio-economic and political factors that fuel extremism. Key components should include economic development by investing in job creation and opportunities to alleviate poverty and provide alternatives to joining extremist groups. Also critical is the need for political reforms by strengthening governance and promoting political stability to restore public trust and diminish the appeal of extremist narratives.

It is therefore crucial to note that while violent extremism continues to challenge the stability and security of West African states, a comprehensive and inclusive strategy that addresses the root causes of extremism holds the promise of building a more peaceful and resilient region. These strategies could also include expanding access to quality education to empower youth and equip them with the tools to resist radicalization; and fostering dialogue and reconciliation within and between communities to bridge divides and promote social cohesion.

The Role of Peacebuilders, Peacebuilding and Conflict Prevention
In the face of the escalating threat of violent extremism in West Africa, a network of dedicated peacebuilders is working tirelessly to counteract extremist narratives and promote peaceful conflict resolution. Through grassroots initiatives, community engagement, and dialogue, these activists strive to address the root causes of violence and build a more peaceful and inclusive society.

One notable effort is the recent three-day training workshop held in Abuja, Nigeria, organized by the Research and Action for Peace Network (REcAP Network). This workshop, implemented by the West Africa Network for Peacebuilding (WANEP) in partnership with the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) and the Danish Refugee Council (DRC), and funded by the European Union (EU), focused on “Conflict Prevention, Violent Extremism, Crisis Management, and Peacebuilding.” The objective was to foster stronger community ties, promote dialogue and reconciliation, and cultivate a culture of peace and mutual understanding.

The three-day training featured various facilitators, including Dr. Bridget Osakwe, the Nigeria National Network Coordinator for WANEP-Nigeria; and Dr. Festus Kofi Aubyn, Regional Coordinator for Research and Capacity Building at WANEP-Regional. Others are: Ms. Edwige Dede Mensah, who discussed early warning response, negotiations, mediation, and dialogue on alternative dispute resolution; and Ms. Patience Ikpeh-Obaulo, Head of Programmes at WANEP-Nigeria, who facilitated sessions on Gender, Peace, and Security.

The project, which trained 20 participants, aims to establish a sustainable, inclusive, and effective regional network of experts specialized in peacebuilding and the prevention of conflicts and violent extremism. This network will operate across 18 countries in West Africa and the Lake Chad Basin, providing an interactive platform for regional cooperation and knowledge sharing.

Training the next generation of peacebuilders: Osakwe highlighted the goal of the training, which is to engage 20 beginners who had no prior knowledge in peacebuilding. “The overall objective of the project is to strengthen the role of civil society, including regional, national, and community practitioners and researchers, in effective peacebuilding, crisis management, and the prevention of conflict and violent extremism in West Africa and the Lake Chad Basin. This enables more informed decision-making by policymakers,” she explained. She underscored the necessity of expanding peacebuilding efforts to include more practitioners and researchers who can apply their knowledge in various domains. According to her, the ultimate goal is to have more individuals practicing and studying peacebuilding, thereby broadening the reach and impact of these efforts.
Building knowledge and community resilience: Aubyn described knowledge as progressive, saying: “it is always good to acquire knowledge, but don’t keep it to yourself; it is always good to impart it”. According to him, “knowledge should be shared within communities and workplaces. We need to change, and that change doesn’t rest solely on the government.” Aubyn emphasized that peacebuilding knowledge should be disseminated at the community level and integrated into everyday practices and interactions. He pointed out that while the government plays a crucial role, community-driven initiatives are equally important in fostering sustainable peace.
The path forward and inclusive efforts: Despite these commendable efforts, peacebuilders face significant challenges. The complex web of factors driving violent extremism—poverty, political instability, ethnic tensions, and lack of access to education—requires comprehensive and coordinated approaches. Osakwe noted that expanding peacebuilding initiatives and bringing more practitioners and researchers into the field is essential for addressing these multifaceted issues effectively. The facilitators stressed on the central theme of the training was the importance of inclusive efforts in peacebuilding. Accordingly, the workshop aimed to build bridges between communities, promote dialogue and reconciliation, and create a culture of peace and understanding. By involving a diverse group of participants, including those without prior knowledge of peacebuilding, the project sought to cultivate a broad-based, grassroots movement for peace. They noted that the collaborative approach adopted by REcAP Network, WANEP, SIPRI, DRC, and the EU underscores the vital role of international partnerships in addressing violent extremism. Such partnerships bring together diverse perspectives and resources, enhancing the effectiveness of peacebuilding initiatives.

Challenges of Conflict Faced by West African Governments
Despite concerted efforts by West African governments to combat violent extremism, the challenges they face are immense. The region is plagued by weak governance, widespread corruption, porous borders, and limited resources, all of which significantly hinder the ability to effectively address the root causes of extremism and dismantle the networks of extremist groups operating in the region. Moreover, the transnational nature of violent extremism complicates efforts, making it difficult for individual countries to tackle the issue in isolation.

“When you look at the West African states, the Sahel, Lake Chad and even the coastal areas these places are involved with different levels of conflict. At the Sahel, we have aggravated conflict, in part of Nigeria and the Lake Chad basin we also have high-intensity conflict, what this is saying is that we are not doing much in terms of conflict prevention,” Aubyn noted.

Ungoverned Spaces: Ungoverned spaces have been a significant factor contributing to extremism in many West African states. These areas, often perceived as marginalized by the government, become breeding grounds for violent activities due to the lack of effective governance and security presence. Providing insight into the violence in Nigeria’s North East, Dr. Osakwe explained, “At the start of Boko Haram, it was initially perceived through the lens of religion, power struggles, and other factors. However, we now see banditry in the North West and farmer-herder conflicts in the North Central. “The crises differ in their ideologies,” Osakwe continued, “but one common factor is that these crises thrive in ungoverned spaces where government presence is minimal. In these areas, there are numerous identity issues and unresolved grievances.”
Osakwe emphasized that the perceived marginalization and lack of appropriate channels for addressing grievances exacerbate the situation. “A lot of people feel marginalized and do not have proper avenues to voice their concerns, leading to an escalation of violence and extremism,” she noted. This highlights the critical need for governments to establish stronger governance and security frameworks in these vulnerable areas to prevent the proliferation of extremist ideologies and violence.

Weak Governance and Corruption: Weak governance and rampant corruption are pervasive issues in many West African countries. Government institutions often lack the capacity and resources to enforce the rule of law effectively, which creates an environment where extremist groups can operate with relative impunity. Corruption further undermines public trust in government institutions, making it easier for extremist groups to exploit grievances and recruit disenfranchised individuals. The lack of accountability and transparency within government structures also means that funds meant for development and security are often misappropriated, exacerbating the conditions that give rise to extremism.
Porous Borders: The region’s porous borders facilitate the movement of extremist groups, weapons, and illicit goods, making it challenging for any single country to contain the spread of violence. Extremist groups like Boko Haram and Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) take advantage of these ungoverned spaces to establish safe havens and conduct cross-border attacks. The difficulty in securing these borders is compounded by the vast and often inhospitable terrain, which stretches the limited resources of border security agencies.
Limited Resources: Many West African countries face significant economic challenges that limit their ability to invest in comprehensive counter-extremism strategies. Limited resources mean that governments often focus on immediate security responses rather than long-term preventive measures. This reactive approach is insufficient to address the deeply rooted socio-economic issues that fuel extremism, such as poverty, unemployment, and lack of access to education. Without sufficient investment in development and social services, the underlying drivers of extremism remain unaddressed.
Transnational Nature of Extremism: The transnational nature of violent extremism poses a significant challenge to regional stability. Extremist groups operate across national borders, making it difficult for individual countries to combat them effectively. Coordinated regional responses are essential but often hampered by differing national interests, lack of trust between governments, and bureaucratic inefficiencies. The need for intelligence sharing, joint military operations, and harmonized policies is critical to disrupt the operations of extremist networks.
Early Warning Signs and Conflict Escalation: Dr. Aubyn, during his presentation on ‘Conflict and Conflict Prevention,’ emphasized the importance of recognizing and responding to early warning signs of conflict. He noted that conflicts in the region often come with early indicators that are neglected by authorities, leading to escalation. “For every conflict experienced in an environment, there have been early warning signs neglected by the authorities,” Aubyn stated. He highlighted the necessity of immediate and concerted efforts by relevant authorities to prevent situations from escalating into full-blown conflicts. He illustrated the varying levels of conflict across the region, from aggravated conflicts in the Sahel to high-intensity conflicts in parts of Nigeria and the Lake Chad Basin. “When you look at the West African states, the Sahel, Lake Chad, and even the coastal areas, these places are involved with different levels of conflict. At the Sahel, we have aggravated conflict; in part of Nigeria and the Lake Chad Basin, we also have high-intensity conflict. What this is saying is that we are not doing much in terms of conflict prevention.”
Deep-Rooted Grievances and Injustices: The challenges the region faces are complex and multifaceted. The rise of extremist groups, the proliferation of weapons, and the lack of economic opportunities have created a fertile ground for conflict. Deeply entrenched grievances and injustices further fuel extremism. Addressing these issues requires a coordinated, multi-dimensional approach that involves strengthening governance, reducing corruption, securing borders, and allocating sufficient resources to conflict prevention and resolution efforts.

The Need for a New Strategy
The threat of violent extremism in West Africa continues to evolve and spread, making the need for a new, comprehensive strategy more urgent than ever. By prioritizing prevention, community engagement, and international cooperation, West African governments can address the root causes of extremism and build a more peaceful and resilient society for future generations.

Evolving Conflict Dynamics: The nature of conflicts is constantly changing, requiring strategies that are adaptable and multifaceted. A purely military approach is insufficient; addressing the underlying grievances that drive individuals to join extremist groups is crucial. Dr. Bridget Osakwe emphasized the importance of community engagement, youth empowerment, education, and economic development as key pillars of prevention and intervention efforts. “The effectiveness of any peacebuilding strategy is only as good as the conflict analysis it is based on,” Osakwe stated. She underscored the need for the government to provide basic amenities for citizens, particularly in rural areas. “These individuals are only demanding their rights, which is not difficult to achieve,” she added.
Addressing Ungoverned Spaces: Osakwe highlighted that violent extremism thrives in ungoverned spaces. “In the North East, terrorism penetrated easily because extremists provided locals with their basic needs,” she explained. Recently, the government has recognized that purely military approaches are ineffective and has begun incorporating non-kinetic interventions. “All over the world, kinetic approaches have not worked. We need dialogues, conversations, and comprehensive conflict analysis to identify causes and necessary actions for intervention,” Osakwe emphasized. She urged for proactive measures to manage conflicts before they escalate. “We must think of missed opportunities within our environment and address them as early warning signs. Early response and inclusive processes are crucial,” she said.
Engaging the Youth: Dr. Festus Kofi Aubyn stressed the importance of engaging the youth, who constitute the majority of the population. “The youths today are not the youths of the 90s. Look at what happened in Kenya, where the youth opposed the government’s actions. We must not take the youth for granted,” he cautioned. Referring to the ENDSARS protest in Nigeria, he emphasized the need for the government to empower the private sector to create job opportunities for young people. “The government needs to invest in the economic system for the youth. The youth must be represented in decision-making processes to ensure their perspectives are considered,” Aubyn said. He warned that if the youth are excluded from economic opportunities and decision-making, civil unrest led by the youth is inevitable. “We are heading towards a pit if measures are not put in place to stem the tide,” he warned.
Broader African Context: Aubyn noted that the issues facing Nigeria are common across many African countries. “In the 1960s, there were fewer universities and less population pressure. Now, the population has more than doubled, but opportunities have not kept pace,” he observed. He highlighted the problem of older generations occupying positions that should be available to the youth. “This situation forces some young people to undertake dangerous journeys in search of better opportunities, illustrating the failure of our governments,” he concluded.
Proffering Solutions
Aubyn posited that proactive steps must be taken to prevent conflicts from escalating. “In terms of future responses, we need to invest more in conflict prevention and peacebuilding. Our attention has always been on reactive responses by defense and security forces, which do not address the root problems,” he stated. He called for greater investment in governance, especially on issues concerning the youth, such as unemployment and economic opportunities.

“We need a paradigm shift in our government structures, institutions, and ways of doing things. Otherwise, we are heading for danger,” Aubyn warned. He emphasized Nigeria’s potential role as a leader in Africa, urging the country to take decisive action to improve governance and address the challenges it faces.

Coordinated Regional Efforts: To effectively tackle violent extremism, West African governments must enhance their collaboration, not only within the region but also with international partners. This includes sharing intelligence, coordinating military efforts, and harmonizing policies to disrupt the operations of extremist networks. Additionally, investing in socio-economic development to address the underlying causes of extremism—such as poverty, unemployment, and lack of education—remains critical.
Investing in Socio-Economic Development: A holistic approach to combating violent extremism involves not just immediate security measures but also long-term strategies aimed at promoting good governance, economic development, and social cohesion. Governments need to invest in education, healthcare, and infrastructure to create opportunities for their citizens. By addressing the socio-economic disparities that extremists exploit, governments can reduce the appeal of extremist ideologies.
Building Resilient and Inclusive Societies: Ultimately, building resilient and inclusive societies where grievances can be addressed through dialogue and peaceful means is essential. This requires a holistic approach that combines immediate security measures with long-term strategies aimed at promoting good governance, economic development, and social cohesion. Engaging communities in peacebuilding efforts, promoting dialogue and reconciliation, and ensuring that all segments of society feel represented and heard are crucial steps towards achieving lasting peace and stability in West Africa.

Participants’ Takeaways

The workshop and training sessions left a lasting impact on the participants, who shared their key takeaways and insights:

Ayebaebi Ruth Moses, Member, Women and Girls with Albinism Network: “The workshop on capacity building, conflict prevention, peacebuilding, and countering violent extremism provided participants with valuable insights and practical tools to address the complex challenges of conflict and violence in their communities. By investing in capacity-building initiatives and promoting inclusive and participatory peacebuilding processes, stakeholders can work together to build resilient communities that are better equipped to prevent and resolve conflicts non-violently. Moving forward, it is essential to continue engaging with stakeholders and taking a holistic approach to peacebuilding and countering violent extremism to promote sustainable peace and security.”

Amb. Salihu Honest Gode, AMAC Student President: “My key takeaway from the REcAP Training was learning strategies to combat misinformation and disinformation. I was inspired by the focus on promoting diversity and equity, which aligns with my goal of creating an inclusive platform for open dialogue and skill-building workshops. I plan to apply the knowledge gained from the training to enhance my efforts in empowering youths by conducting step-down training to pass on the knowledge acquired.”

Susan Oluwatosin Michael, Director, Women Peace and Security, BBFORPEACE: “The REcAP Workshops provided valuable insights into effective conflict resolution. Among the key learnings, I found the following particularly thought-provoking: Readiness for peace, whereas external actors, no matter how skilled, cannot impose peace if conflicting parties are not willing to settle. While ensuring readiness for peace is essential, comprehensive and ongoing conflict analysis is also crucial for successful peacebuilding. Neglecting it can result in ineffective strategies and responses, therefore, anticipating crises should be paramount. Crises are not sudden events but rather the result of insufficient information or analysis. Early warning systems should gather data and trigger timely and appropriate responses.“

Earnest Oche, Youth Network for Community and Sustainable Development: ” For me, I learned that conflict is a clash of interest between two or more parties that perceive their interests or goals as incompatible. These groups can be small or large, communities, or states. When people’s goals are not compatible, conflict will likely occur. Perception matters greatly—the way we receive information or view a particular subject or situation is crucial. In dealing with conflict, we must analyze the situation critically to understand it thoroughly and propose better solutions that benefit both parties involved. In peacebuilding, one must be an excellent analyst to avoid taking sides and exacerbating the conflict. The training has given me a clearer picture of how to handle conflicts at various stages and manage any disputes within my community.”

Building a Better Future – A Call to Action
The challenges faced by West African citizens and governments in combating violent extremism are immense and multifaceted. Addressing these challenges requires a comprehensive and coordinated approach that involves strengthening governance, securing borders, investing in socio-economic development, promoting regional collaboration, and engaging communities, especially the youth. By taking these steps, West African countries can begin to address the root causes of extremism and build a more peaceful and resilient future for their citizens.

The efforts of peacebuilders in West Africa represent a crucial step towards combating violent extremism. By empowering individuals and communities with knowledge and strategies for conflict prevention and peacebuilding, these initiatives create a more stable and harmonious region. The success of these efforts depends on continued support from governments, international organizations, and local communities. Through sustained collaboration and commitment, it is possible to build a future where peace and security prevail over violence and extremism.

In a nutshell, the rising extremism in West Africa underscores the critical need for a holistic and coordinated strategy to combat this menace. The insights from the REcAP workshop, alongside the testimonies of dedicated peacebuilders, highlight the importance of addressing the root causes of extremism through comprehensive conflict analysis, proactive governance, and socio-economic development. By fostering regional collaboration, empowering communities, and prioritizing youth engagement, West African states can work towards mitigating the threat of violent extremism and building a more stable and secure future for their citizens. The collective efforts of governments, international organizations, and civil society are pivotal in realizing this vision of peace and resilience.

Violent Extremism in West Africa and the Need for a New Strategy to Peace

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Nigeria Tightens War on Plastic Waste, Makes Producers Responsible for End-of-Life Products

Published

on

Nigeria Tightens War on Plastic Waste, Makes Producers Responsible for End-of-Life Products

…NESREA unveils 2026 regulations as country generates 2.5m tonnes of plastic waste annually

By: Michael Mike

The Federal Government has unveiled new regulations to tackle Nigeria’s growing plastic waste crisis, placing greater responsibility on producers, importers and other businesses for the recovery and proper management of plastic products after use.

The National Environmental (Plastic Waste Control) Regulations, 2026, unveiled by the National Environmental Standards and Regulations Enforcement Agency (NESREA), seek to move the country from a “make, use and throw away” system to a circular economy based on recovery, recycling and resource efficiency.

Nigeria generates an estimated 2.5 million tonnes of plastic waste annually, much of which ends up in drains, waterways and communities, contributing to environmental degradation, flooding and public health concerns.

Speaking at the Stakeholder Implementation Dialogue and inaugural multi-stakeholder roundtable on “Less Plastic in Water,” the Director-General of NESREA, Prof. Innocent Barikor, said the regulations marked a shift from policy formulation to implementation.

“Today is significant because it marks a transition from policy intention to implementation,” he said.

Barikor said the success of the regulations would ultimately be measured by cleaner communities and waterways, increased plastic recovery, stronger recycling markets and greater accountability by producers.

At the centre of the new framework is the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) principle, under which producers, importers and other businesses placing plastic products on the Nigerian market are expected to take responsibility for their products throughout their life cycle, including their recovery and environmentally sound management after use.

The regulations cover producers, importers, retailers, consumers, recyclers and waste managers, while introducing requirements relating to plastic shopping bags, recycled content and recycling facilities.

Certain plastic shopping bags below 80 microns in thickness are subject to regulation, while PET packaging will be required to contain at least 25 per cent recycled PET by January 2028, rising to 50 per cent thereafter.

Recycling facilities must also comply with prescribed environmental standards, while the production of plastics containing prohibited toxic substances will attract sanctions.

Businesses operating within regulated activities are required to obtain the necessary permits and registrations within the stipulated compliance period. Violations may attract financial penalties and, where applicable, imprisonment and personal liability.

The Chairman of the NESREA Governing Board, Hon. Garba Datti Muhammad, described plastic pollution as a major threat to waterways, livelihoods, communities and public health, stressing that effective implementation would require cooperation among government, industry, Producer Responsibility Organisations, recyclers, subnational authorities, development partners and citizens.

Barikor also identified the strengthening of the National Producer Registry as critical to enforcement, investment planning and measuring environmental performance.

“Data should not be viewed merely as an administrative requirement; it is the foundation upon which producer accountability, investment decisions, recovery systems and credible environmental outcomes can be built,” he said.

The government acknowledged the importance of plastics to healthcare, food preservation, agriculture, manufacturing and other sectors, stressing that the objective was not to eliminate plastic but to curb irresponsible production, consumption and disposal.

Particular attention is being paid to single-use plastics and sachet water, which millions of Nigerians rely on because of its affordability. Officials said alternatives must therefore be environmentally sustainable, affordable and accessible to vulnerable populations.

The “Less Plastic in Water” initiative is part of the Plastic Reboot Nigeria Project, a five-year programme supported by the Global Environment Facility and implemented by the United Nations Environment Programme.

The Minister of Environment, Balarabe Lawal, represented by the Permanent Secretary, Alhaji Salihu Aminu Usman, said stronger implementation of EPR could stimulate investment in recycling, expand markets for recovered materials and create jobs.

He urged stakeholders to view discarded plastics not simply as waste but as potential raw materials for new industries.

Barikor stressed that tackling plastic pollution required coordinated action, saying: “No ministry can solve the plastic problem, no agency can solve it, no company can solve it.”

He warned that the regulations would only have meaning if backed by effective enforcement.

“A regulation without enforcement is merely a wish,” he said.

The focus now shifts to implementation, including producer registration, enforcement of EPR obligations, monitoring, improved waste recovery, investment in recycling infrastructure and the development of viable alternatives to avoidable single-use plastics.

If effectively enforced, the 2026 regulations could mark a significant shift in Nigeria’s environmental policy by making producers more accountable for the full life cycle of their products while transforming plastic waste into an economic resource.

Nigeria Tightens War on Plastic Waste, Makes Producers Responsible for End-of-Life Products

Continue Reading

News

Group Demands Transparency, EIAs Over JBS’ $2.5bn Nigeria Investment

Published

on

Group Demands Transparency, EIAs Over JBS’ $2.5bn Nigeria Investment

By: Michael Mike

The Environmental Rights Action/Friends of the Earth Nigeria (ERA/FoEN) has demanded full disclosure of the agreement between the Federal Government and global meat-processing giant JBS over its proposed $2.5 billion investment in Nigeria, warning that the project must not proceed without rigorous environmental and multi-sectoral scrutiny.

The environmental rights organisation said it was not opposed to foreign investment, job creation or industrial development, but insisted that the proposed JBS project must be subjected to transparent negotiations, independent environmental assessments and effective regulatory oversight to ensure that Nigerians and host communities do not bear the cost of the investment.

Deputy Executive Director of ERA/FoEN, Mariam Bassey-Olson, said the controversy surrounding the proposed investment should not be framed as a choice between development and opposition to foreign capital.

She said the critical issue was the nature of the investment, its terms, the resources it would require and its potential consequences for Nigeria’s farmers, communities, environment and food system.

“When people hear a company is coming to Nigeria and is bringing $2.5 billion, our first reaction is fantastic jobs, investment, infrastructure and development. But before we celebrate the numbers, we need to pause and ask a fundamental question: what exactly is this investment?” she said.

The proposed project reportedly involves the establishment of six facilities — three poultry, two beef and one pork processing plants — a scale ERA/FoEN said demands comprehensive scrutiny because of its potential implications for land ownership, livestock production, water resources, biodiversity, agriculture, local markets and food security.

Bassey-Olson said the debate was fundamentally about Nigeria’s control over its food system and whether local farmers and communities would retain meaningful economic opportunities as large-scale industrial production expands.

“This is about our land, our livestock, our people, our communities, our biodiversity, our farmers, our feed, our water, our markets, our food security and our food sovereignty,” she said.

She stressed that ERA/FoEN was not opposed to investment, arguing that foreign capital could support development when governed by policies that prioritise public interest.

“We are not against investment. We are not anti-investment. We are saying investment must have a people’s face. Investment must protect public interests,” she said.

The organisation consequently demanded the immediate publication of the agreement or Memorandum of Understanding between JBS and the Nigerian government, saying the public should be able to examine the conditions attached to a project of such magnitude.

Bassey-Olson said ERA/FoEN had sought details of the proposed investment since 2024 but that the agreement had remained outside the public domain.

“We want to know the terms of this investment. What does it mean for our people? What lands have been allocated? Have Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) been done? What will happen to our water? What will happen to the economy? Where will the land be sourced from?” she asked.

She argued that making the agreement public would not undermine the investment but would instead strengthen confidence in the government’s handling of the project.

“If you have something and you are coming to help the people as you claim, you should be very open in sharing whatever you have with the people,” she said.

The organisation also raised concerns over the possible regional consequences of a large-scale industrial meat operation in Nigeria, arguing that pollution, emissions, wastewater management and other environmental impacts could affect communities and ecosystems beyond the immediate project locations.

Bassey-Olson urged the African Union and other regional institutions to pay attention to major investments of this nature, warning that decisions taken by Nigeria could influence investment and environmental standards across Africa.

“If something is normalised in Nigeria, other countries will pick up and say, since Nigeria is our big brother, we should do it,” she said.

She further questioned the implications of JBS’ reported changes to previous climate commitments, insisting that Nigeria should assess the company’s environmental record and commitments before approving operations on such a large scale.

“If a company can backtrack, what does that mean for Nigeria?” she asked, stressing that enforceable environmental safeguards should take precedence over corporate assurances.

Also speaking, Joyce Brown, Director of Programmes at the Health and Modern Health Foundation, said concerns over the investment were informed partly by reports and controversies surrounding JBS’ environmental and socioeconomic record in some countries where it operates.

Brown said Nigeria should learn from experiences elsewhere and establish strong regulatory mechanisms capable of ensuring that the proposed investment generates broad-based economic benefits without imposing disproportionate costs on local communities, farmers or the environment.

“We want a situation where there are policies in place, there are structures in place that ensure that these sorts of investments are beneficial to the people,” she said.

She expressed particular concern over the absence, to the organisation’s knowledge, of evidence that Environmental Impact Assessments had already been conducted for the proposed facilities.

“So far, there is no evidence of any EIA conducted already,” Brown said.

She acknowledged reports that land had already been allocated in Niger State, but insisted that comprehensive environmental assessments should precede construction and large-scale operations.

According to her, EIAs would enable regulators and affected communities to identify potential impacts on land, water, ecosystems and livelihoods and establish appropriate mitigation measures before irreversible damage occurs.

Brown also demanded publication of the government-JBS agreement, saying experts in agriculture, environment, health and other relevant fields should be given access to the document for independent assessment.

“The agreement that JBS has signed with the Nigerian government is not in the public domain. This is something that should be available for experts across the various sectors to review, to ensure that we are not at the receiving end of any negative implications such a large-scale investment can have,” she said.

She maintained that the campaign was a demand for due diligence rather than a rejection of foreign capital, urging the government to examine JBS’ international track record and incorporate lessons from other jurisdictions into Nigeria’s regulatory framework.

Brown further called for a coordinated review involving all ministries, departments and agencies whose mandates could be affected by the project.

She questioned whether the approval process had adequately involved the ministries responsible for agriculture, environment, health and other relevant sectors, given that the project would extend beyond livestock production.

“This is something that different ministries and departments of Nigeria should come together to review before it is endorsed,” she said.

Brown also expressed concern that the process appeared to be driven largely by the Ministry of Livestock Development, arguing that the scale of the proposed investment warranted broader government participation.

“We do not know if the Ministry of Agriculture, the Ministry of Environment, the Ministry of Health and other relevant agencies are involved in the approval for JBS to start operations in Nigeria,” she said.

ERA/FoEN and its partners, while leading a parade on the National Assembly, called on the legislative house to exercise legislative oversight over the investment, insisting that the project should be examined against its implications for land, water resources, public health, agriculture, food security and the livelihoods of host communities.

“This is an investment that will take large expanses of land, that will affect water resources, that will affect the local communities and the people who live and depend on these environments, and it must be taken very seriously,” Brown said.

Group Demands Transparency, EIAs Over JBS’ $2.5bn Nigeria Investment

Continue Reading

News

Ughelli North: Egbo Responds To Transparency Call, Showcases Projects Across Council

Published

on

Ughelli North: Egbo Responds To Transparency Call, Showcases Projects Across Council

Ughelli North: Egbo Responds To Transparency Call, Showcases Projects Across Council

The Executive Chairman of Ughelli North Local Government Area, Olorogun (Barr.) Jaro Movudu Egbo, KSC, has responded to the transparency demands raised by the New Order Movement (NOM), highlighting a number of infrastructure and development projects executed or ongoing under his administration across the local government.

NOM had called on the council chairman to provide greater transparency and accountability on the utilisation of funds allocated to Ughelli North in 2026, particularly against the backdrop of the local government’s reported ₦18.29 billion budget.

The group had also demanded a detailed account of allocations received by the council, an update on projects being executed and greater engagement with stakeholders, insisting that residents deserved to see tangible benefits from public resources.

Responding to the concerns, Egbo pointed to what his administration described as “visible and measurable” achievements in infrastructure, healthcare, security, education, electricity, environmental sanitation and staff welfare.

According to him, the interventions are being implemented in line with the M.O.R.E. Agenda of Delta State Governor, Rt. Hon. Sheriff Oborevwori.

One of the major projects highlighted by the chairman is the ongoing construction of an ultra-modern Ughelli North Local Government Secretariat Complex, designed to improve administrative efficiency and provide a conducive working environment for council workers.

He also noted that the construction of a modern gatehouse for the secretariat was nearing completion, while the Legislative Assembly Complex had been rehabilitated with executive furniture, modern cooling systems and dedicated electricity supply.

In the health sector, Egbo’s administration highlighted the ongoing construction of the Tobore Oborevwori Cottage Hospital and Maternal Health Centre, which is expected to include doctors’ and nurses’ quarters.

The council said the facility was part of efforts to improve access to quality healthcare services within the local government.

The administration also cited the development of organised multi-storey market stalls for traders and the construction of the Ughelli Court dual-court complex as part of its interventions to support commerce and strengthen access to justice.

On road infrastructure, the council disclosed that rehabilitation of the long-neglected Post Office Road was ongoing, involving concrete and asphalt overlay as well as improved drainage around the Ughelli High Court.

The chairman also highlighted interventions in the power sector, saying three 11/33 KVA transformers had been procured and installed in strategic communities to improve electricity supply.

Power was also restored to the council secretariat through extensive electrical rewiring, while solar energy systems, including daytime solar panels and solar-powered streetlights, were deployed, according to the council.

On security, Egbo said collaboration with security agencies had helped improve safety along previously troubled sections of the East-West Highway.

The council stated that security operations around the Ogor, Evwreni and Ohoror axis had significantly reduced incidents of kidnapping and armed robbery along the Evwreni-Uwheru and Uvwiamuge-Agbarho corridors.

The administration further disclosed that it donated a fully equipped patrol vehicle to the Police Mobile Force and constructed a new police post to strengthen security operations.

In education, the council said more than 300 school desks, uniforms, textbooks and writing materials had been distributed to pupils in public primary schools.

It added that the administration had partnered with the Delta State Universal Basic Education Board (SUBEB) to support teacher retraining and classroom rehabilitation.

On environmental sanitation, the council said it carried out extensive desilting and clearing of drainage channels along the East-West Road in Agbarho to reduce flooding, while also reviving the monthly environmental sanitation exercise.

The administration further pointed to improvements in staff welfare, including the settlement of outstanding financial claims and regular welfare incentives for members of the Nigeria Union of Local Government Employees (NULGE).

Several key offices within the council secretariat have also been renovated and furnished, while the council expanded its operational fleet with official vehicles for principal officers, a Toyota Hilux for the Chief Security Officer and an 18-seater bus for the council’s Press Unit.

Assembly Committee, Auditor-General Commend Council

Egbo further stated that the council’s financial records had been subjected to scrutiny by the Delta State House of Assembly Public Accounts Committee and the Auditor-General for Local Governments in the state.

According to him, following the scrutiny of the council’s accounts and financial activities, both the Public Accounts Committee and the Auditor-General for Local Governments commended the council for what they described as prudence and transparency in the management of its finances.

He said the commendations from the statutory oversight bodies further demonstrated his administration’s commitment to accountability and responsible management of public resources.

Egbo said the council had nothing to hide and remained prepared to subject its financial records and activities to appropriate oversight in accordance with the law.

Egbo Alleges NDC-Sponsored Negative Campaign

Egbo also alleged that the New Order Movement’s campaign against his administration was politically motivated, describing it as a negative campaign allegedly sponsored by Omoragbege, the National Democratic Congress (NDC) senatorial candidate for Delta Central.

According to Egbo, the objective of the alleged campaign was to discredit his administration and weaken the political standing of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Ughelli North ahead of the next general election.

He alleged that those behind the campaign believe that sustained attacks on his administration would erode public support for the APC and create an advantage for the NDC at the polls.

The council chairman, however, said he would not be distracted by what he described as politically motivated attacks, insisting that his administration would continue to focus on projects and programmes capable of improving the lives of residents.

He maintained that the achievements recorded by his administration were visible across various sectors and should speak for themselves, rather than being overshadowed by political campaigns.

The projects and interventions listed by the administration constitute its response to concerns over development and the utilisation of public resources in Ughelli North, with Egbo maintaining that his administration has continued to channel resources into projects and services with direct impact on residents.

Meanwhile, he reaffirmed his commitment to consolidating the achievements recorded so far through sustained investment in infrastructure, healthcare, education, security, youth empowerment and economic development.

Egbo pledged to continue providing transparent, responsive and people-centred governance, with the objective of positioning Ughelli North as a model of grassroots development in Delta State.

Ughelli North: Egbo Responds To Transparency Call, Showcases Projects Across Council

Continue Reading

Trending

Verified by MonsterInsights