News
VP Shettima charges journalists on courage to serve as conscience of the nation
VP Shettima charges journalists on courage to serve as conscience of the nation
By: Our Reporter
The Vice President, Senator Kashim Shettima, has implored media professionals in Nigeria to be more focused on objectively speaking truth to power rather than antagonising the government.
Drawing the distinction between antagonism and speaking truth to power, he also urged members of the fourth estate of the realm to, as a matter of necessity, always strive to strike a balance between their allegiance to self and to truth.

Senator Shettima who gave the charge on Saturday during the Public Presentation of the Book, “Persona Non Grata,” authored by a seasoned journalist, Mr. Ismail Omipidan, at the Ladi Kwali Hall of the Abuja Continental Hotel, said the goal must hinge on serving a greater good and a deserving humanity.
“What must be spelt out is that there is a distinction between antagonising a government and speaking truth to power. The latter is driven by a noble principle to serve a greater good and a deserving humanity.
“The former, on the other hand, is usually a self-serving exercise that fades into futility, and that is not the end we should aspire to achieve with the information and ideas we labour to acquire and process in our line of work,” he stated.
Taking a leaf from “The Republic,” a Socratic dialogue, written by the Greek Philosopher, Plato, the Vice President pointed out that to really build a nation that can best be described as an ideal state, the intellectual class, especially the journalists, must be allowed to be the nation’s conscience.

Categorically, the VP told the journalists that apart from speaking truth to power, the nation also needs them, as media professionals, to serve as the country’s conscience.
He continued: “No political leader, however sincere their intentions, can excel beyond the scale of the knowledge at their disposal, and this is particularly telling in our political space.
“While we need an army of courageous media professionals to speak the truth to power, we also need them to serve as the conscience of the political institutions and individuals who influence the evolution of society, including the questions of our collective survival.”
VP Shettima however observed that the real courage required to serve as the conscience of the nation “lies in resisting compromise in one’s pursuit of truth.

“True courage is being able to tell the truth even in a congress of critics and bullies. The rush to partake in a smear campaign, even in the face of superior facts, is, of course, not an act of courage. This distinction sets courage apart from cowardice. It takes rare integrity to recognise the difference between the two “Cs”, he added.
Urging both leaders and media practitioners, as well as other well-meaning citizens to “aspire to learn where and when to draw the line between courage and cowardice,” the Vice President described the author of the book, Mr. Omipidan, as a journalist who “has shown that, in reporting the ups and downs of his nation, true allegiance isn’t to oneself, but to one’s society.
“This awakening has defined his kind—the realisation of what one truly aspires to accomplish in advocating for a nation that functions, a nation that cares, and a nation that’s accountable. You cannot solve a crime objectively by investigating the cause away from the crime scene,” he said.
Describing the book, “Persona Non Grata”, as “a declaration of the price of adhering to noble principles even in the face of corrupting temptation,” VP Shettima pointed out that the book is not “a record of the journey to being cancelled for telling uncomfortable truths.”

He recommended Omipidan’s book to both practising and aspiring journalists, as well as any professional seeking “to find a balance between their allegiance to self and to truth” as a cautionary tale that “will inspire sobering reflections even within Nigeria’s media ecosystem.
“The man on whose invitation we gather here today must not go down in our history as either a persona non grata or a provocateur. He has been an essential pillar of our interactions as a nation and has helped determine the direction our society is headed. Each of us, therefore, must not fail in the performance of our duty to fill this moral vacuum,” he further stated.
In his welcome remarks, the Chief Host of the book launch, Minister of Marine and Blue Economy, Alhaji Isiaka Adegboyega Oyetola, thanked Vice President Shettima “for taking time out of his demanding schedule to attend the book launch.
He said the book is a compilation of the vast experiences of the author, his work in the private and public sectors.
According to him, the book speaks volumes about the author’s strength of character, resilience and commitment that defines his personal and professional judgement, as well as integrity in journalism.
“The title of the book, “Persona Non Grata,” states his curiosity and rightly so. As I delve into the pages it became apparently clear that he put his mind and soul into his work. It is not just a professional memoir, it is a profound commentary of the complexities of power and unforeseen forces that shape public perception,” Oyetola stated.
On his part, the book reviewer, and the Editor of Saturday Tribune, Mr. Lasisi Olagunju, said Omipidan’s book has 31 short chapters with the foreword written by Farouk Gberugi.
He said that he has taken time to read the book from the title page to all the pages that chronicle the author’s early life, and his many experiences.
In his vote of thanks, the author of the book, Ismail Omipidan, thanked the Vice President for honouring his invitation.
He recalled the first time he discussed with him ten years ago about writing a book, and the VP told him: “You have not seen anything yet; what are you writing about?”
Omipidan said he accepted to work with Oyetola when he was the Governor of Osun State because he is a man of honesty and integrity.
Among others who made brief remarks about the author were the Director-General of the Federal Radio Corporation of Nigeria (FRCN), Dr. Mohammed Bulama, who recalled Omipidan’s days as a journalist in Borno State where he enjoyed the protection of the Vice President, and former President of the Guild of Editors, Funke Egbemode, who recounted her experience with him as a colleague in the newsroom at the Sun newspaper.
VP Shettima charges journalists on courage to serve as conscience of the nation
News
Plateau government finally admits attack on Fulani traders when suddenly silence is no longer an option
Plateau government finally admits attack on Fulani traders when suddenly silence is no longer an option
By: Zagazola Makama
Something rather unusual happened in Plateau today. The Plateau State Government actually condemned an attack on Fulani traders.
Yes, Fulani traders, although the official statement carefully introduced them as simply “traders,” perhaps because mentioning the word Fulani might make the incident slightly more uncomfortable for some people.
The attack on traders returning from the Kara Livestock Market in Bukuru left one person dead and seven others injured after their vehicle came under gunfire.
The government’s reaction is welcome. But it also leaves one wondering: Why does the government seem to become more interested in an attack only after it has become impossible to pretend it did not happen?
For years, the public has watched a familiar script unfold. An attack happens. Nobody wants to talk too much about it. Then there is a reprisal. Suddenly, the state becomes extremely concerned, press statements appear. Condolences are issued. The Governor personally visits the scene and tells them, “Nobody can take over your land,” while security agencies are urged to act. And the reprisal becomes the headline.
The government’s statement referred to the victims as “traders.” Nothing wrong with that, technically. But everyone knows who these particular traders were. They were peaceful Fulani pastoralists returning from a livestock market. So why the linguistic gymnastics? Is “Fulani” now one of those dangerous words that must be handled with protective gloves? If the victims had been identified as members of the Berom or Mwaghavul community, would their identity have been equally inconvenient?
And there’s this funny thing about the information ecosystem and propaganda platforms in Plateau. When the incident occurred, many Plateau-based platforms were quick to circulate claims pointing accusing fingers at Fulani militia attacking locals, with some calling for quick intervention. Then the narrative was convenient.
But when subsequent information reportedly pointed in another direction, including allegations involving suspected Berom militia, the same enthusiasm disappeared. The microphones became silent. And, rather mysteriously, the internet developed a severe case of selective mutism. The same platforms that had been shouting suddenly discovered the beauty of silence. The headlines vanished. The outrage suddenly lost its urgency. They pretended not to see the attack again. Why? Because the victims are Fulani.
Apparently, when the suspected attacker is Fulani, everyone becomes an investigative journalist. When the allegation points elsewhere, everyone suddenly remembers the importance of waiting for security agencies to investigate.
It is almost as if somebody is waiting for the second half of the tragedy because it fits the preferred narrative better.
Of course, there is another subject that nobody seems particularly enthusiastic about discussing: “cattle rustling”. And somehow, the subject continues to receive considerably less attention from government of Plateau state. On a daily basis, hundreds of livestock are allegedly stolen from Fulani herders in Plateau by militia groups. Hundreds of others are killed on a daily basis.
And here is the script: “You attack a pastoralist, steal his cattle, destroy his livelihood and then act surprised when the community becomes angry and carries out a reprisal. You then subsequently use the anger generated by that crime as proof that the original victim was the aggressor.” You will even hear some of the youth leaders always saying, “Just because they kill their cows, does that give him the right to attack us?” Let’s simply rearrange the chronology of the crimes in Plateau. If a Fulani person commits a crime today, he must face the law and pay heavy compensation. Infact, the Governor had issued a directive that any herder caught destroying farmland should be nutrialised.
But on the contrary, If a Berom person or any plateau local commits a crime by attacking a Fulani and killing their livestock, the next day, women will protest his arrest and demand that he must be released. In fact, the new name for criminals in Berom communities is “Defenders of the Land.”
At the same time, if a Mwaghavul person commits a crime, he must not face the law. And if any journalist should carry the report like Zagazola, ahh, that one is the spokesperson of the bandits. In this context, who are the bandits?
The innocent people that suffered the initial attack that led to the arrest of the Mwaghavul militia. In many Plateau communities, criminality means patriotism because the criminal belongs to the Berom ethnic group.
The government’s condemnation of the Bukuru attack is therefore welcome. But condemnation alone is not enough. If they really want to end this madness, they must also identify the attackers and take them out. They must expose anyone financing violence through stolen livestock or other criminal proceeds.
Most importantly, the government must resist the temptation to treat justice as a popularity contest. The question should never be, “Which community do we want to defend?”
Because if the state continues to condemn only the violence that fits its preferred narrative, then everybody will eventually become an expert at playing victim while the criminals quietly continue doing business.
Plateau government finally admits attack on Fulani traders when suddenly silence is no longer an option
News
Police invite NDC candidate over alleged display of firearm at political gathering
Police invite NDC candidate over alleged display of firearm at political gathering
By: Zagazola Makama
KANO — The Kano State Police Command has invited the New Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) candidate, Hon. Aminu Abdullahi Warkal, for questioning over an alleged display of a firearm during a political gathering.
The command disclosed this in a statement issued by its spokesperson, CSP Abdullahi Haruna Kiyawa, on Monday, Oct. 5, 2026.
According to the statement, the command came across a video circulating on social media during its routine cyber patrol, in which Warkal was allegedly seen displaying what appeared to be a pump-action firearm.
The police said the allegation, if established, could constitute a violation of the Firearms Act and raise public-safety concerns, particularly in the context of political activities.

The command said Warkal was invited to its headquarters in Bompai, Kano, on the directive of the Commissioner of Police, CP Ibrahim Adamu Bakori.
The candidate is currently with the command’s State Intelligence Department (SID), where questioning and investigation into the circumstances surrounding the alleged display are ongoing.
The Commissioner of Police warned that the command would not tolerate unlawful conduct, violence or the display of weapons in ways capable of causing fear or threatening public peace, irrespective of the status of the person involved.
He urged political candidates, supporters and other stakeholders to conduct their activities peacefully and in accordance with the Electoral Act, firearms laws and other applicable legislation.
The command also reiterated its commitment to protecting lives and property and maintaining peace in Kano State before, during and after the political season.
The police have not indicated the outcome of the investigation, and the allegation against Warkal remains subject to the ongoing inquiry.
Police invite NDC candidate over alleged display of firearm at political gathering
News
Suspected Mwaghavul Militia Attack on Herders Reported in Mangu, Cattle Shot in Plateau
Suspected Mwaghavul Militia Attack on Herders Reported in Mangu, Cattle Shot in Plateau
By: Zagazola Makama
Suspected armed Mwaghavul militia members have reportedly attacked herders around Kombilin in Panyam District of Mangu Local Government Area of Plateau State, shooting an unspecified number of cattle.
Security sources told Zagazola Makama that the incident occurred at about 4:30 p.m. on Sunday, Oct. 4, 2026.
Preliminary reports indicated that the assailants, suspected to be members of a Mwaghavul militia group, targeted herders in the area and opened fire on their cattle.
The exact number of cattle killed or injured in the incident had yet to be established as details were still emerging.
The circumstances surrounding the attack, including whether any persons were injured or killed, remained unclear at the time of reporting.
Further details are being awaited as efforts continue to establish the full circumstances of the incident.
Suspected Mwaghavul Militia Attack on Herders Reported in Mangu, Cattle Shot in Plateau
-
News3 years agoRoger Federer’s Shock as DNA Results Reveal Myla and Charlene Are Not His Biological Children
-
Opinions5 years agoTHE PLIGHT OF FARIDA
-
News1 year agoFAILED COUP IN BURKINA FASO: HOW TRAORÉ NARROWLY ESCAPED ASSASSINATION PLOT AMID FOREIGN INTERFERENCE CLAIMS
-
News3 years agoEYN: Rev. Billi, Distortion of History, and The Living Tamarind Tree
-
Opinions5 years agoPOLICE CHARGE ROOMS, A MINTING PRESS
-
ACADEMICS3 years agoA History of Biu” (2015) and The Lingering Bura-Pabir Question (1)
-
Columns3 years agoArmy University Biu: There is certain interest, but certainly not from Borno.
-
Politics1 year ago2027: Why Hon. Midala Balami Must Go, as Youths in Hawul and Asikira/Uba Federal Constituency Reject ₦500,000 as Sallah Gift
