2027: Why Hon. Midala Balami Must Go, as Youths in Hawul and Asikira/Uba Federal Constituency Reject ₦500,000 as Sallah Gift

By: Dr. James Bwala

The youths of Hawul and Askira/Uba Federal Constituency have expressed significant regret over their decision to vote for Hon. Midala Balami of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) as their representative in the Green Chamber. This sentiment stems from perceived unfulfilled campaign promises and a lack of tangible development projects within the constituency since his assumption of office. Many youths feel marginalized, claiming that their concerns regarding education, employment, and infrastructure remain largely unaddressed.

This disillusionment reflects a broader trend among Nigerian youth, who increasingly demand accountability and effective representation from their elected officials. The initial optimism accompanying Balami’s election has given way to frustration due to inadequate legislative performance and limited engagement with constituents’ needs. While legal disputes affirmed his election victory, these judicial endorsements have done little to alleviate grassroots dissatisfaction. Consequently, the youths’ regret underscores the urgent need for responsive governance that prioritizes community development and inclusivity.

The youth’s declaration that Hon. Midala Balami must not represent them again in 2027 reflects a growing dissatisfaction with political leadership and representation. This sentiment underscores the critical importance of responsive governance, where elected officials are expected to address the evolving needs and aspirations of their constituents. Young people, as a dynamic demographic, demand accountability and tangible progress, which they feel has been lacking under Hon. Balami’s tenure. Such discontent is emblematic of broader challenges in democratic participation, where trust between representatives and the represented is paramount. 

This call for change highlights the role of youth engagement in shaping political futures. The rejection of a previously favored representative suggests an increased political awareness among young voters who prioritize performance over loyalty or tradition. It also indicates their desire for leaders who embody transparency, inclusivity, and innovation—qualities necessary for addressing contemporary socio-economic issues. As such, the youths’ stance serves as a potent reminder that political legitimacy hinges on continued relevance and responsiveness to constituent demands.

The youths in Hawul and Askira/Uba federal constituency who are insisting that Hon. Midala Balami should not represent them again by 2027 exemplify a critical shift toward active civic participation and heightened expectations from political figures. It emphasizes the need for politicians to maintain genuine engagement with younger populations to sustain democratic vitality and social cohesion. Failure to do so risks alienation of key demographics crucial for future governance and national development.

According to the youths, a senator from Osun State has revealed that Nigerian senators receive ₦2 billion while members of the House of Representatives collect ₦1 billion for constituency projects. Despite these substantial allocations, there is a glaring absence of tangible development within their constituencies. This disclosure highlights a critical discrepancy between funds disbursed and actual infrastructural or social improvements on the ground. Such revelations have intensified public scrutiny regarding transparency and accountability in legislative financial management.

The implications of this exposé are profound, as it underscores systemic challenges in governance and resource utilization within Nigeria’s political framework. The youths’ concerns reflect widespread disillusionment with elected officials who seem to prioritize personal enrichment over community development. This situation calls for robust mechanisms to monitor expenditure and ensure that constituency funds translate into meaningful progress. Ultimately, addressing these issues is essential for restoring public confidence and enhancing democratic governance. 

READ ALSO: https://newsng.ng/how-shettimas-foreign-engagements-position-nigeria-among-progressive-nations/

Democracy in Northern Borno State appears to yield tangible benefits, particularly through the efforts of their representatives. However, only Hon. Betara Aliyu, the representative of Biu, Kwaya, Bayo, and Shani constituencies in southern Borno, seemed to have signed a deal to represent his constituency. His active involvement in legislative and developmental initiatives has brought noticeable dividends to his constituency, contrasting sharply with the other southern Borno representatives, who remain largely absent in representations of their people. This disparity underscores a broader issue within regional governance and resource allocation that affects equitable development.

The northern Borno constituencies have experienced infrastructural improvements and increased political attention due to effective representation. Conversely, the southern areas suffer from neglect and lack of meaningful democratic engagement beyond Hon. Betara Aliyu’s contributions. This uneven distribution challenges the foundational democratic principle of equal representation and calls for more inclusive policies that address the continued stagnation in southern Borno by its own representatives.

The viral video depicting the rejection of Hon. Midala Balami’s Sallah gift of ₦500,000 by constituents, who expressed their dissent with the Hausa phrase “Bamayi,” meaning “We are not doing it again,” serves as a profound manifestation of political discontent. This incident underscores a significant disconnect between the elected representative and his electorate, highlighting the latter’s dissatisfaction with his performance in the Green Chamber. The outright refusal of monetary compensation symbolizes a deeper repudiation of his legitimacy and effectiveness as a public servant.

Such public displays of rejection are indicative of broader socio-political dynamics where citizens demand accountability and genuine representation rather than superficial gestures. The phrase “Bamayi” encapsulates a collective sentiment that transcends mere opposition; it reflects an active decision to withdraw support from Hon. Balami’s leadership. This event thus becomes emblematic of democratic engagement, wherein constituents assert their right to evaluate and respond critically to their representatives’ actions.

The viral video is not merely about rejecting financial aid but represents an emphatic declaration against perceived inadequate representation in governance structures. It challenges politicians to introspect on their roles and prioritize meaningful service delivery over tokenistic offerings.

Hon. Midala Balami, as the representative of the Askira-Uba/Hawul Federal Constituency, has received constituency allocations aimed at fostering development within these regions. However, there remains a pressing need for transparency regarding how these funds have been utilized to address the socio-economic challenges faced by the constituents. Constituency allocations are critical for local infrastructure, education, healthcare, and economic empowerment projects; thus, accountability in their deployment is essential to ensure tangible improvements. 

The lack of detailed public information on Hon. Balami’s specific initiatives or projects funded by these allocations raises concerns among stakeholders and constituents alike. Given that effective governance requires openness and responsiveness to public inquiries, it is imperative that Hon. Balami provide a comprehensive explanation detailing his achievements or ongoing efforts in Hawul and Askira/Uba with respect to the constituency funds allocated to him. Such an explanation would not only enhance trust but also enable informed civic engagement within the constituency.

I am also a youth in this area. I believe that transparency concerning the management of constituency allocations by Hon. Midala Balami is crucial for democratic accountability and sustainable development in Hawul and Askira/Uba. Clear communication about fund utilization will foster confidence among constituents while promoting greater oversight of public resources.

James Bwala, PhD, writes from Abuja.

2027: Why Hon. Midala Balami Must Go, as Youths in Hawul and Asikira/Uba Federal Constituency Reject ₦500,000 as Sallah Gift

Bagare calls on APC supporters to continue to give support for the party in Yobe

By: Yahaya Wakili

The All Progressives Congress (APC) chairman stakeholder of Nangere local government area of Yobe state, Alhaji Aliyu Saleh Bagare, the Madakin Tikau, has called on the party supporters in the area to always continue to support the party.

Alhaji Aliyu Saleh Bagare, who is also the former Deputy Governor of Yobe State, started this when the former APC leaders of 11 wards in Nangere local government area paid him a Sallah homage in his residence at Potiskum.

He said, “His Excellency, Governor Mai Mala Buni, CON, and the state party chairman and other party executives are not in Nigeria; they were in Saudi Arabia to perform hajj, and I assure them that as soon as they return, they will sit down and discuss their problems.”

Also speaking at the occasion, the state party executive, Alhaji Abdu Dagazurwa (alias Abdu Visual), assured the former party leaders to be patient; very soon things will be normalized, Inshallah.

He maintained that the All Progressives Congress (APC) is the party that everybody is rushing to join because of its justice and honesty in governance.

Earlier, speaking, the former chairman of Chillariye ward, Malam Umaru Muhammed, said they were at the residence of the chairman stakeholder to pay him a Sallah homage. He said, since they left the leadership of the party, they are still supporting the party 100%.

The chairman stakeholder of APC Nangere local government area, Alhaji Aliyu Saleh Bagare, also received a strong long-term member of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Alhaji Sule Dan Ladi, who shifted his loyalty to APC. 

Bagare assures him that the door of the APC is always open to everybody who is willing to join the party, and they will carry everybody along like the member of the party before.

Bagare calls on APC supporters to continue to give support for the party in Yobe

The journey in two years: Tinubu and Shettima’s leadership fosters a narrative of progress that challenges opposition skepticism while positioning Nigeria favorably on the global map.

By: Dr. James Bwala

The past two years of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and Vice President Kashim Shettima have been characterized by a blend of commendations and criticisms, reflecting the complexities of governance in Nigeria. Their administration has navigated significant challenges, with both leaders striving to assert their roles amid public scrutiny and political opposition. While Tinubu’s leadership is often viewed through the lens of his extensive political experience, Shettima brings a background as a former governor and senator, contributing to the executive’s multifaceted roles in providing good governance to Nigerians. 

Despite efforts to consolidate power and implement policy initiatives, their tenure has faced notable backlash. Opposition parties have criticized frequent foreign trips by both leaders as wasteful expenditures that may detract from domestic governance priorities during times of economic hardship. These critiques underscore the delicate balance between international diplomacy and internal accountability.

Tinubu and Shettima’s journey over two years reflects a complex dynamic where achievements coexist with public dissatisfaction. Their administration continues to grapple with managing perceptions while addressing Nigeria’s pressing socio-economic issues. The discourse around their governance reveals not only policy challenges but also broader questions about leadership efficacy in contemporary Nigerian politics. 

The presidential ticket of Bola Ahmed Tinubu and Kashim Shettima, both Muslims, initially sparked widespread debate in Nigeria due to concerns over its religious composition. Critics feared that the Muslim-Muslim ticket might exacerbate religious tensions or marginalize Christian communities. However, this apprehension has largely been countered by evidence demonstrating that the duo’s political journey has been marked by inclusivity and balanced governance. Rather than emphasizing religion, their leadership underscores competence and national unity, echoing historical precedents where shared religious identity did not hinder political success. 

Christian leaders under the National Solemn Assembly (NaSA) have publicly acknowledged a shift in perception regarding the ticket. Initial fears of religious oppression have given way to recognition of equitable representation within government appointments and policymaking processes. This evolving acceptance highlights how effective governance can transcend sectarian divides and foster national cohesion.

READ ALSO:https://newsng.ng/police-charge-rooms-a-minting-press/

Despite initial skepticism rooted in Nigeria’s complex religious landscape, the Tinubu-Shettima ticket exemplifies a promising model where leadership is defined by vision and inclusiveness rather than sectarian affiliation. Their journey thus far challenges entrenched biases against Muslim-Muslim tickets and reaffirms the primacy of competence over religion in Nigerian politics. This shift in perspective underscores the importance of evaluating political candidates based on their policies and ability to address national issues, rather than solely on their religious affiliations. 

The ongoing success of their administration serves as a testament to the potential for political unity and progress when leaders focus on shared goals rather than divisive identities. As their administration continues to navigate complex national challenges, the focus remains steadfast on economic development, security enhancement, and infrastructural growth, further reinforcing the narrative that effective leadership transcends religious affiliations. Their administration’s commitment to fostering inclusive growth and addressing the diverse needs of Nigeria’s populace continues to dismantle preconceived notions about religious exclusivity in governance. 

The call by the Concerned Northern Muslim Ummah for President Bola Tinubu to replace Vice President Kashim Shettima with a Northern Christian as running mate in the 2027 presidential election represents a misplaced political appeal rather than an objective solution to Nigeria’s complex political dynamics. While the group frames its demand as a pursuit of religious balance and national cohesion following the contentious Muslim-Muslim ticket of 2023, such an appeal risks reducing political representation to mere religious arithmetic, potentially exacerbating divisions instead of fostering genuine unity. 

This demand can be interpreted as an expression of coalition opposition cloaked in religious rhetoric. By urging Muslim aspirants to step aside for Christian candidates, the group implicitly politicizes religion as a tool for electoral bargaining rather than promoting inclusive governance based on merit and policy considerations. Hence, while religious inclusivity is important, politicizing it in this manner undermines democratic principles and may deepen identity-based cleavages under the guise of fairness. 

The emphasis on religious identity as a primary criterion for political appointments disregards the multifaceted challenges facing Nigeria, where effective leadership and governance should ideally transcend sectarian lines. In a nation grappling with economic challenges, security threats, and infrastructural deficits, prioritizing religious identity over competence and visionary leadership could detract from addressing the pressing needs of the populace. Instead, fostering a political environment where leaders are evaluated based on their ability to address systemic issues and drive progress is crucial for Nigeria’s development trajectory.

Contrary to the antics of opposition parties, President Bola Tinubu and Vice President Kashim Shettima have demonstrated commendable leadership that is gradually placing Nigeria on a transformative path. Despite criticisms and misinformation propagated by detractors, their administration has embarked on bold economic reforms aimed at stabilizing and revitalizing the Nigerian economy. For instance, Tinubu’s decisive removal of the fuel subsidy and realignment of the multiple exchange rate have been pivotal in curbing corruption and fostering fiscal responsibility. These policies reflect a strategic vision geared towards long-term national development rather than short-term populism.

Shettima’s active engagement in international forums such as the US-Africa Business Summit underscores Nigeria’s commitment to attracting foreign investment and enhancing infrastructure development. His diplomatic efforts complement Tinubu’s domestic policies by promoting agribusiness, energy innovation, and sustainable growth. Contrary to false claims suggesting Shettima’s disengagement from his duties, credible reports confirm his proactive role in advancing Nigeria’s interests abroad. Together, their leadership fosters a narrative of progress that challenges opposition skepticism while positioning Nigeria favorably on the global map.

* James Bwala, PhD, writes from Abuja.

The journey in two years: Tinubu and Shettima’s leadership fosters a narrative of progress that challenges opposition skepticism while positioning Nigeria favorably on the global map.