News
Why the New IGP Must Protect the Integrity of Police Promotions as Nigerians Are Watching
Why the New IGP Must Protect the Integrity of Police Promotions as Nigerians Are Watching
…Some Officers Climb the Ladder, Others Take the Elevator….
By: Zagazola Makama
There are many roads to promotion in the Nigeria Police Force. Some are long, winding and filled with hardship. They pass through insurgency-ravaged communities in Borno, bandit-infested forests in Zamfara, kidnapping hotspots in Niger State and dangerous highways where officers routinely place their lives on the line.
Recent revelations published by TheCable have reopened an uncomfortable conversation within the Nigeria Police Force and among members of the public: Is promotion in the Force still governed primarily by merit and institutional procedures, or is proximity to political power becoming an increasingly valuable qualification?
The controversy stems from reports that Femi Gbajabiamila, Chief of Staff to President Bola Tinubu, wrote two separate letters to the Police Service Commission (PSC) requesting special promotion for eight police officers attached to political office holders, including officers attached to the President.
One of the letters, dated February 20, 2026, reportedly contained the names of three officers, while another listed five officers.
The recommendations sought the elevation of one officer from Assistant Commissioner of Police (ACP) to Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP), while others were recommended for promotion from Chief Superintendent of Police (CSP) to Assistant Commissioner of Police (ACP).
According to the report, the officers were recommended on account of their “exemplary leadership qualities, gallantry, teamwork and general performance.” Nobody disputes that these are admirable qualities.
Indeed, they are precisely the qualities expected of every police officer. Yet that is where the debate begins.
Across police formations nationwide, many officers quietly wonder whether gallantry has suddenly become more visible when displayed within the corridors of power than when demonstrated on the frontlines.
For decades, Nigerian police officers have worked under difficult conditions. Many have fought insurgents in the North-East. Others have pursued armed bandits through forests and mountains. Some have lost colleagues in violent confrontations with criminals. Many have spent years separated from their families while serving in high-risk operational environments.
Yet promotion has traditionally followed a structured process involving service records, examinations, seniority, performance assessments and recommendations through established channels.
That is why the reported intervention by a political office holder has generated concern.
Not necessarily because the officers involved are unqualified. Rather, because many fear the precedent it may establish.
One senior officer, speaking anonymously, observed that if recommendation letters from political offices become an accepted route to accelerated promotion, many officers may begin to reassess what constitutes career excellence.
“The officer risking his life in a remote operational base may start wondering whether his greatest mistake was choosing a dangerous posting instead of a strategic attachment,” he said.
The remark was delivered with humour. Its implications are anything but amusing.
The controversy revolves largely around the provisions of the Police Service Commission Act. Section 6 of the Act clearly assigns responsibility for appointments and promotions of police officers, excluding the Inspector-General of Police to the Police Service Commission.
The same legislation states that the Commission shall not be subject to the direction, control or supervision of any authority or person in the exercise of those responsibilities.
It was argued that while the President may issue directives relating to broad policy matters affecting the Commission, the law was deliberately designed to shield personnel decisions from external influence. A professional police force therefore cannot thrive if promotions become susceptible to political pressure.
This is not merely a legal issue. It is a question of institutional credibility. Every disciplined organisation depends on the confidence of its members. An officer who spends years serving in difficult and dangerous environments must believe that hard work, competence and sacrifice remain the principal pathways to advancement.
Once that belief weakens, morale inevitably suffers. Many retired officers argue that the greatest threat to any institution is not always external. Sometimes it is the gradual erosion of confidence in the fairness of internal processes.
The controversy has also revived memories of a similar debate within the military.
It will be recalled that President Tinubu’s aide-de-camp, Nurudeen Yusuf, reportedly rose from Lieutenant Colonel to Colonel in January 2025 and was subsequently to be elevated to Brigadier-General through what was described as a special presidential promotion. The proposal reportedly generated significant disquiet within military circles before plans for the decoration were shelved.
The latest revelation however, revives questions that have refused to go away.
Are Nigeria’s security institutions drifting toward a culture in which proximity to political power increasingly influences career progression? Or are these isolated incidents being misunderstood? Whatever the answer, perception matters. And perception, rightly or wrongly, is often more powerful than official explanations. The average police officer does not read legal opinions. He observes outcomes.
He watches who gets promoted, how quickly it happens and what circumstances surround the process. If he concludes that some officers are operating on a faster track, resentment may follow. That is why many stakeholders believe the issue deserves careful handling by the new Inspector-General of Police.
At a time when the Force is striving to improve professionalism, discipline and public confidence, few issues are more sensitive than promotion. Every rank earned should command respect. Every promotion should inspire confidence. Every officer should believe that the rules apply equally to all.
This is why many Nigerians believe the new IGP faces a challenge that goes beyond crime-fighting. He must protect the credibility of the promotion system.
He must convince officers that career progression is determined by professionalism, competence and sacrifice rather than access to corridors of power.
Otherwise, the message being sent across the Force may be difficult to ignore. Why spend years chasing criminals in forests when a posting close to political power appears capable of performing miracles for one’s career?
Why endure hardship postings when proximity may be more rewarding than performance?
Such questions may be uncomfortable, but they are increasingly being asked.
The truth is that institutions are weakened not only by corruption or insecurity. They are weakened when their members begin to suspect that rules apply differently depending on who is involved. The Nigeria Police Force cannot afford that perception.
Whether fair or unfair, that perception alone can damage an institution. The new IGP would therefore be wise to remember one important fact. Nigerians are watching. More importantly, police officers are watching.
And in an institution built on discipline and hierarchy, nothing attracts attention quite like a fast-moving elevator in a building where everyone else is climbing the stairs.
Why the New IGP Must Protect the Integrity of Police Promotions as Nigerians Are Watching
News
Nigeria, India Sign Landmark Human Rights Pact, Fagbemi Backs Stronger Institutional Independence
Nigeria, India Sign Landmark Human Rights Pact, Fagbemi Backs Stronger Institutional Independence
…AGF pledges justice ministry’s support for implementation, demands practical safeguards for citizens in AI era
By: Michael Mike
Nigeria and India have signed a bilateral agreement to strengthen human rights protection, institutional capacity and access to justice, with the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Prince Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, pledging the Federal Government’s support for its implementation.
Fagbemi, who described the agreement as a strategic partnership between the two countries, said its success would ultimately be measured by its impact on ordinary citizens, particularly vulnerable and marginalised groups seeking justice.
The agreement, executed between the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) of Nigeria and its Indian counterpart, is designed to deepen institutional cooperation, facilitate knowledge transfer, promote technical exchanges and strengthen operational capacity in addressing human rights violations.
The Attorney-General gave the government’s position on Tuesday in Abuja when he received a joint delegation of the two commissions at the Federal Ministry of Justice, describing the partnership as timely, particularly in an increasingly interconnected world where effective human rights protection requires stronger legal frameworks, institutional collaboration and respect for the rule of law.
The development followed a high-level engagement between the two commissions and the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), at the Supreme Court Complex, Abuja, on Monday, as part of a two-day working visit by the Indian delegation.
The Nigerian delegation was led by the Executive Secretary of NHRC, Chief Tony Ojukwu, SAN, OFR, while the Indian delegation was headed by the Chairperson of India’s NHRC, Justice V. Ramasubramanian, accompanied by the Commission’s Joint Secretary, Mr. Samir Kumar.
Fagbemi said the partnership brought together two major democracies with shared common-law traditions, diverse populations and dynamic constitutional frameworks, expressing satisfaction with the thematic areas identified for cooperation under the agreement.
He specifically highlighted access to justice and the protection of digital rights as critical areas requiring urgent attention, particularly as emerging technologies, including Artificial Intelligence, continue to reshape society and create new human rights concerns.
According to him, both countries must develop legal safeguards to protect data privacy, prevent algorithmic bias and safeguard civic space, while ensuring that technological advancement does not undermine fundamental freedoms.
He said the Ministry of Justice expected the two commissions to produce actionable research and policy recommendations capable of addressing these emerging challenges.
Beyond emerging technologies, the Attorney-General stressed that Nigeria’s commitment to human rights must be reflected in the practical implementation of constitutional guarantees and international obligations, rather than merely in the existence of legal provisions.
He cited the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, which Nigeria domesticated through the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act, Cap. A9, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004, as a major instrument underpinning the country’s human rights jurisprudence.
The Charter provides important protections relating to non-discrimination, human dignity, fair trial and personal liberty, reinforcing the fundamental rights guaranteed under Nigeria’s Constitution.
Fagbemi maintained that the true measure of a country’s commitment to human rights was its ability to translate constitutional provisions into accessible institutions, accountable public authorities and an independent judiciary.
He assured the Indian delegation that the Federal Ministry of Justice fully supported the bilateral initiative and was prepared to facilitate technical engagements, joint legal reviews and policy consultations aimed at improving the efficiency of the justice sector.
The Attorney-General also used the engagement to reaffirm the institutional independence of Nigeria’s National Human Rights Commission, stressing that its autonomy was essential to its credibility and effectiveness.
He specifically drew attention to Section 6(3) of the National Human Rights Commission (Amendment) Act, 2010, which provides that the Commission, in exercising its statutory functions, shall not be subject to the direction or control of any other authority or person.
According to him, the administration has continued to respect and protect the Commission’s statutory independence, describing it as fundamental to institutional integrity.
He further noted that the relationship between the NHRC and the Federal Ministry of Justice had been characterised by constructive institutional synergy, mutual respect and a shared commitment to advancing human rights.
The Attorney-General commended Ojukwu and the Nigerian commission for spearheading the bilateral initiative, while expressing appreciation to the Indian delegation for bringing its expertise and institutional experience to the partnership.
Earlier, during Monday’s engagement with the Chief Justice of Nigeria, the Executive Secretary of NHRC Nigeria had emphasised the complementary responsibilities of the judiciary and national human rights institutions in protecting fundamental freedoms, upholding the rule of law and ensuring access to justice.
Ojukwu identified complaint management, Alternative Dispute Resolution, security sector accountability, comparative legal research, digital rights, Artificial Intelligence ethics and environmental justice as priority areas for cooperation between both countries.
The Chief Justice reaffirmed the commitment of the Nigerian Judiciary to human rights protection and encouraged both commissions to exchange experiences and adopt best practices, particularly in strengthening safeguards for vulnerable groups, including women, children and persons with disabilities.
The Indian delegation described the engagement as significant to relations between the two countries, noting that the MoU represented a first-of-its-kind institutional partnership for India’s National Human Rights Commission.
The agreement is expected to promote sustained institutional exchanges, strengthen complaint-handling mechanisms, improve professional capacity and encourage comparative research into legal and policy approaches to human rights protection.
The partnership also comes at a time when national human rights institutions face increasing demands to address abuses linked to security operations, discrimination, environmental degradation, digital surveillance and the misuse of emerging technologies.
For Nigeria, the collaboration offers an opportunity to strengthen its human rights enforcement architecture through international knowledge-sharing while reinforcing the independence and operational effectiveness of its national commission.
Fagbemi, however, cautioned that the ultimate benchmark of the agreement must go beyond official engagements and institutional exchanges to deliver tangible improvements in the lives of citizens, especially those most vulnerable to violations and denied access to justice.
He wished the Indian delegation a productive stay in Nigeria and expressed confidence that the partnership would advance the shared commitment of both countries to human dignity, justice and the protection of fundamental rights.
Nigeria, India Sign Landmark Human Rights Pact, Fagbemi Backs Stronger Institutional Independence
News
NSCDC Strengthens Gender Policy Implementation, Trains Officers on SGBV, Digital Safety
NSCDC Strengthens Gender Policy Implementation, Trains Officers on SGBV, Digital Safety
By: Michael Mike
Corps partners SPRING, FCDO, TechHer to promote women’s participation in peacebuilding, tackle technology-facilitated violence
The Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) has intensified efforts to combat sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV), strengthen women’s participation in security decision-making and promote digital safety among young people through the implementation of its Gender Policy II.
The Commandant-General of the Corps, Prof. Ahmed Audi, stated this at a two-day Gender, Women, Peace and Security capacity-building training organised at the NSCDC College and Support Staff Service, Udege, Nasarawa State.
The training was organised in collaboration with Strengthening Peace and Resilience in Nigeria (SPRING), with support from the United Kingdom’s Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO).
Audi, who delivered his keynote address through a representative, said the policy provided a framework for mainstreaming gender considerations into the Corps’ operations, personnel management, leadership structure and community engagement.
He stressed the need for effective prevention and response to sexual and gender-based violence, including conflict-related abuses and technology-facilitated violence.
The Commandant-General also called for increased participation of women in peacebuilding and security decision-making, equal opportunities within the Corps and stronger partnerships with traditional institutions, government agencies, civil society organisations and development partners.
He urged commands and personnel, particularly Gender Desk Officers, to ensure effective coordination, timely reporting, appropriate referrals, monitoring and accountability in handling gender-related cases.
Audi described the implementation of the policy as a collective responsibility requiring sustained commitment across all levels of the Corps.
In a goodwill message, the Osu Ajiri of Edege Chiefdom, Alhaji Suleiman Ahmed Eko IV, commended the NSCDC for its presence in the community, saying its operations had strengthened the sense of security among residents, particularly farmers.
The traditional ruler pledged the support of his council in addressing gender-based violence, describing the protection of the community as a priority.
Earlier, the Commander of the College, ACG Jamilu Indabawa, said collaboration among relevant stakeholders was critical to achieving effective implementation of the gender policy.
The Gender Equality, Diversity and Social Inclusion Lead of SPRING, Mrs Amina Akano-Bello, said the training was designed to promote peaceful and resilient communities through early identification and response to gender-based violence, as well as the inclusion of women and young people in leadership.
Also, the NSCDC National Headquarters Gender Unit Adviser, DCC Ajet Kemi, provided participants with insights into the different forms of sexual and gender-based violence, their societal implications and preventive measures.
A retired Assistant Commandant-General, Ahmed Abodurin, who facilitated a session on institutional ethics in gender policy implementation, emphasised professionalism, accountability, gender sensitivity and adherence to institutional standards.
Beyond the capacity-building exercise, the Corps partnered TechHer, an organisation promoting women’s advancement through technology, to extend digital safety awareness to schools in Udege.
The outreach, themed “Stop Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence”, educated students on the dangers of digital abuse, responsible online behaviour and measures for staying safe in digital spaces.
Representatives of the Federal Ministry of Interior, Nasarawa State Ministry of Women Affairs and Social Development, Nasarawa State Ministry of Justice and Gammuo International also delivered goodwill messages, reaffirming the importance of collective action in advancing gender equality, peace and security.
NSCDC Strengthens Gender Policy Implementation, Trains Officers on SGBV, Digital Safety
News
Bank customer alleges N2.59m theft from two GTBank accounts
Bank customer alleges N2.59m theft from two GTBank accounts
By: Michael Mike
A customer of Guaranty Trust Bank, Stella Adepegba, has accused the bank of negligence after fraudsters allegedly stole N2.59m from two accounts belonging to her and her daughter within 24 days.
Adepegba said the incidents occurred on October 8 and November 1, 2026, with the perpetrators allegedly transferring funds without authorisation or security notifications.
She accused the bank of failing to refund the money despite repeated complaints and assurances that the matter would be resolved.
According to her, the first incident involved her daughter, Victoria Adepegba, whose Child Saver’s Account was allegedly compromised on October 8 at about 8pm.
She explained that N2.507m was transferred through the Nigeria Inter-Bank Settlement System Instant Payment channel in four transactions, leaving less than N2,000 in the account.
Adepegba said N399,000, N398,000 and N220,000 were transferred to a Moniepoint account bearing the name Abdulmalik Idris, while another N1.49m went to a GoMoney account bearing the name Zainab Ibrahim.
She alleged that no debit alerts were received, adding that a GTBank employee informed her of the transactions and offered to block the account after the money had already been withdrawn.
The complainant said she reported the incident at the bank’s Kubwa branch in Abuja on October 9 and was instructed to document the unauthorised transactions.
However, she alleged that the bank subsequently sent an email attributing the transactions to compromised login credentials, an explanation she rejected.
Adepegba said another N80,000 was fraudulently transferred from her personal GTBank account on November 1 to a FairMoney account bearing the name Jamilu Ahmad, bringing the cumulative loss to N2.587m.
“GTB could not explain how the hackers successfully stole my money despite changing my account’s log-in details after the attack on my daughter’s account. The bank must refund the stolen funds and go after those who masterminded the fraud,” she said.
She insisted that her mobile phone, SIM card and ATM card were in her possession during both incidents, adding that she neither disclosed her banking credentials nor received OTP requests.
“The implication of these targeted attacks on my bank accounts is that no customer’s funds are safe with GTB, and if anything happens, the bank will not accept responsibility or offer any succour whatsoever,” she lamented.
She stated that a compliance officer, Innocent Ukatu, and the bank’s media consultant, Cornelius Onuoha, initially assured her that the complaint would be resolved.
Reacting to the incident, the Chief Communications Officer of Guaranty Trust Holding Company Plc, Mrs Oyinade Adegite, said the incidents had been investigated and feedback provided to the customer.
She attributed the compromise to customer-side security vulnerabilities, explaining that fraudsters increasingly deploy sophisticated phishing techniques to obtain banking credentials.
“Immediately this came up, it was escalated and investigated, and feedback has been given,” she said.
Adegite explained that customers could unknowingly compromise their accounts by clicking malicious links that install malware that can capture sensitive information.
“Now it’s a phishing link you might click on that sometimes would actually install malware on your phone,” she said.
She maintained that the bank had implemented the necessary security safeguards, including two-factor authentication, and insisted the compromise originated on the customer’s end.
“All the measures the bank has to put in place for us, 2FA, everything was done. So, the compromise came clearly from the customer,” she stated.
However, she expressed sympathy for the losses and said she would follow up on the second incident to explore possible intervention.
The allegations come amid regulatory scrutiny of Nigerian banks over consumer protection and compliance failures.
An earlier analysis of audited financial statements showed that Guaranty Trust Holding Company, GTBank’s parent company, incurred N383.65m in regulatory penalties in Nigeria in 2024.
The sanctions included N56m for consumer protection violations, N160.4m following a Central Bank of Nigeria mystery shopping exercise, N149.25m for compliance-related issues and bank email returns, and N18m following a foreign exchange examination.
Bank customer alleges N2.59m theft from two GTBank accounts
-
News3 years agoRoger Federer’s Shock as DNA Results Reveal Myla and Charlene Are Not His Biological Children
-
Opinions5 years agoTHE PLIGHT OF FARIDA
-
News2 years agoFAILED COUP IN BURKINA FASO: HOW TRAORÉ NARROWLY ESCAPED ASSASSINATION PLOT AMID FOREIGN INTERFERENCE CLAIMS
-
Opinions5 years agoPOLICE CHARGE ROOMS, A MINTING PRESS
-
News3 years agoEYN: Rev. Billi, Distortion of History, and The Living Tamarind Tree
-
ACADEMICS3 years agoA History of Biu” (2015) and The Lingering Bura-Pabir Question (1)
-
Columns3 years agoArmy University Biu: There is certain interest, but certainly not from Borno.
-
Politics1 year ago2027: Why Hon. Midala Balami Must Go, as Youths in Hawul and Asikira/Uba Federal Constituency Reject ₦500,000 as Sallah Gift
