Connect with us

Politics

1999 constitution skewed in favour of the North – Eminent Nigerians

Published

on

1999 constitution skewed in favour of the North – Eminent Nigerians

1999 constitution skewed in favour of the North – Eminent Nigerians

By: Our Reporter

EMINENT Nigerians, including former Chief of Staff, Commodore Ebitu Ukiwe (retd); former Governor of Plateau State, Jonah Jang; Second Republic Senator, Professor Banji Akintoye; President-General of Ohaneze Ndigbo, Chief Nnia Nwodo; former Vice-Chairman of Arik Air, Senator Anietie Okon; Commodore Idongegist Nkanga, (retd); of PANDEF, the leader of Middle Belt Forum, Dr. Bitrus Pogu; former Minister, Prof. Yusuf Turaki and 121 others, yesterday, alleged that the 1999 constitution was skewed in favour of the North.

They also petitioned the United Nations Security Council, African Union, European Union, United States and the British Government on the need to urgently convoke a Sovereign National Conference to discuss the constitutionality of the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria and the 1914 Amalgamation of the Southern and Northern Nigeria within 90 days to save the people from oppression, stagnation and squalor.

The leaders said this after a meeting in Lagos.

The leaders, numbering 127, who spoke under the aegis of the Nigerian Indigenous Nationalities Alliance for Self-Determination, described the 1999 constitution as a fraud; an impunity, hijack and a confiscation of the sovereignties, powers and assets of the South and Middle Belt People of the country by those who clandestinely  designed it.

The statement reads: “We gather here this day as Accredited Delegates of the Constituent Component Nationalities of Nigeria, under the aegis of Nigerian Indigenous Nationalities Alliance for Self-Determination, being a Joint-Cooperation Framework for the Self-Determination Initiatives of the Southern and Middle-Belt of Nigeria on behalf of our Various Peoples and Interests, to Pronounce an end to our toleration of Nigeria’s Unitary Constitutional Order, Unilaterally Imposed and Forcefully Maintained by a Section of the Nigerian country, in negation of the federal basis upon which Nigeria became one political union at independence in 1960, and in brutal subjugation of our collective sovereignties currently being forcefully and fraudulently appropriated by the Nigerian State.

“We gather here today before the global community, to formally proclaim a sovereignty dispute in rejection of the further operation of the imposed, unity constitutional arrangements of Nigeria and in assertion of our inalienable right to self-determination.

“The History of the Colonial beginnings of Nigeria as a Commercial Venture of some Colonial Masters is too well-known to admit of any further repetitions here but suffice it to recall:

“That the manipulations that went into the Flawed Foundations laid in the 1914 Amalgamation of the Protectorates of Southern Nigeria with the Protectorate of Northern Nigeria, created a lopsided Union, locking the Diverse Peoples of Nigeria into one Political Union with two mortally opposed civilizations.

Also Read: Kashim Shettima: An epitomic genre from Borno

“That as Independence approached in 1960, the Diversities of the Various Peoples of the Nigerian Union Dictated the Adoption of the Federal Constitutional Model by the then three largely Autonomous Regions, (namely Eastern, Western and Northern Regions of Nigeria) as the Basis of entering Into Independence as one Political Union in 1960.

“That amidst the early strains of Post-Independence Nigeria arising mainly from the aforementioned Foundational and Pre-Independence manipulations by the Colonial Rulers of the Nigerian Union, the Military coups of 1966 Truncated the Federal Constitutional Basis of Nigeria and plunged the fledgling Union into a catastrophic 30-Month War with it’s Breakaway Eastern Region between 1967 and 1970, triggered by disputations around the terms of the Nigerian Union and leaving in its trail, human carnage in excess of 3million people and a fractured Union now resting on an Unworkable Unitary Constitutional Order Imposed in 1979, by the Fiat of the illicit “Federal Government” which emerged since the 1966 Collapse of the Federation of Nigeria, Forcefully Hijacking and Confiscating the Sovereignties of the Constituent Component Regions of Nigeria that Federated their Sovereignties in 1960.

“That the Prevailing 1999 Constitution of Nigeria which was a wholesale adoption of the 1979 edition via Decree No.24 of 1999, revalidated and reinforced the aforementioned Hijack and confiscation of the Sovereignties, Powers and Assets of the Four Erstwhile Federating Regions by the aforementioned Illicit Federal Government of Nigeria which by Decrees, fractured the Four Regions into 36 States, that are completely emasculated by a 68-Item Federal Exclusive Legislative List that Comprehensively strip the Federating States of All Key Economic Assets and Governmental Powers, thereby creating a totally dysfunctional, corruption-prone, over-centralized system that has failed in every respect, manifesting in Gross Insecurity, Decayed Infrastructure and Mass Impoverishment such that Nigeria, with its Vast Human and Material Resource Endowments, has now emerged as the poverty capital of the world as well as the Global Leading Example of a failed state.

“There is a countrywide consensus against the Unitary Constitutional Arrangements Imposed incrementally on Nigeria by a combination of Guile, Brute Force and Impunity between 1966 and 1999 now codified by the 1999 Constitution. This countrywide consensus had manifested in Several Unilateral Regional and Joint Multi-Regional Actions in Repudiation and Rejection of the Unitary 1999 Constitution of Nigeria:

“The first indication was when in year 2000, the 12 contiguous states of the far North, Simultaneously Imposed and began to implement Sharia in their 3 Domains against the express provision of the 1999 Constitution which in Section 10, forbids the adoption of any state religion. This translates to a unilateral secession from the Secular Union of Nigeria.

“Between 2005 and 2006, a Sovereign Conference of the Ethnic Nationalities of Nigeria, Convened by the Pro-National Conference Organizations (PRONACO), Deliberated exhaustively and produced A Draft Peoples’ Constitution 2006, which had the potential of restoring Nigeria to it’s damaged Federal Foundations. Though Ignored by successive federal governments in Nigeria, that draft became the New Federating consensus against the Prevailing Unitary Constitutional Order in Nigeria.

“It is pertinent to note that across all the Regions of Nigeria, various Socio-Cultural and Ethnic-Interests Vanguard Organizations have also been vehement in expressing the Constitutional Grievances of their own People, (some even violently), thus on the Yoruba side, we have the Afenifere, the Yoruba Elders Council (YCE), Agbekoya, the Yoruba Liberation Command, (YOLICOM), YWC and many more including the ILANA OMO OODUA which now aggregates Several Yoruba Self-Determination Initiatives across the World.

“In the Eastern part of Southern Nigeria, we have Ohanaeze, Movement for the Survival of the Ijaw Ethnic Nationality in the Niger Delta (MOSIEND); Ijaw National Congress, (INC); Ijaw Youth Council (IYC); PANDEF, Midwest Movement, the Niger Delta Peoples Volunteer Force, (NDPVF), MEND, MASSOB, IPOB, others. In the Middle-Belt, we have the Middle-Belt Forum, (MBF), MBC, SOKAPU, CONAECDA and many others.

“Several notable Statesmen in Nigeria including Generals Olusegun Obasanjo and Yakubu Gowon, both (former Heads of State) have lent their voices to the urgent imperative of the Fundamental Reworking of the Damaged Constitutional Basis of Nigeria, warning that any further delay may lead to the catastrophic collapse of the Distressed Nigerian Union.

“Nigeria’s Former Defence Minister, Lt. Gen. Theophilus Danjuma, (retd) had also urged the Indigenous Peoples of Nigeria facing the Ethnic Cleansing Onslaught of the Murderous invaders to defend themselves and their lands in the face of obvious collusion of the Federal Government of Nigeria and its Armed Forces with the Fulani invaders. In the aftermath of the October 2020 #EndSARS Protests many, including the Nigerian Christian Elders Forum (NCEF) now insist that Nigeria needs to be renegotiated.

“On specific constitutional grievances touching on the sovereignties of the constituent components of the federation of Nigeria, the leaders opined that:

“The claim in the Preamble to the 1999 Constitution that ‘We the People’ Firmly and Solemnly Resolved to live in One Political Union and that we Enacted and Gave Ourselves the 1999 Constitution, is self-evidently false as the Decree No 24 of 1999 by which the so-called 1999 Constitution was Promulgated, outlined step-by-step, the Process by which the author of the 1999 Constitution, the Armed Forces Provisional Ruling Council, came about the Document it labeled “the 1999 Constitution. This is a criminal usurpation of the sovereignties of the constituent components whose Exclusive Right it is to make for themselves the Constitution by which they will federate and be governed, as an incident of their sovereignty.

Even by the admission of the 1999 Constitution at Section 14(2)(a), “Sovereignty Belongs to the People, from whom, Government, through this Constitution Derive all its Powers and Authority.

“This is the fountain from which all other constitutional grievances flow and there is no other remedy to this particular grievance than an autochthonous process by which the constituent components will submit their peoples and their lands into a union, and also stipulate the terms of that union, to be ratified by referendums and plebiscites.”

1999 constitution skewed in favour of the North – Eminent Nigerians

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

2027: Coalition embarks on grassroots mobilisation to oust APC in Gombe

Published

on

2027: Coalition embarks on grassroots mobilisation to oust APC in Gombe

Some opposition party members in Gombe State under the auspices of Gombe State Working Group have called on its members to work together to achieve success in 2027 elections and unseat the All Progressives Congress (APC)-led government of Gov. Inuwa Yahaya.

Mr Jibrin Barde, Peoples Democratic Party (PDP)’s 2023 governorship candidate who stated this at a stakeholders’ meeting held in Gombe on Friday, said the coalition would only succeed when they work in unity and put personal interest aside.


Barde expressed optimism that the opposition coalition would defeat the ruling APC in the next general elections.


He emphasised the need for all members to embrace unity to achieve the lofty aspirations of their movement, stressing that harnessing collective strength of the coalition would help them achieve their goal.


He stated that the coalition movement was not about individuals, hence admonished the stakeholders to prioritise the collective interest of the fold above all else.


Barde described the APC government in Gombe as “incompetent and insensitive,” accusing it of failing to improve residents’ welfare and overall governance.


“The APC has failed in Gombe State and we can not allow them to continue their misrule which would further inflict pain on residents.
“We are here to bring better days and ensure a brighter future for all our citizens; this is why we want power to change the narrative for the good of the people,” he said.


Barde stressed the importance of mobilising grassroots politicians and leaders of thought to fortify the movement towards entrenching good governance in Gombe State.


Also speaking, Mr Adamu Modibbo, Social Democratic Party (SDP) chairman in the state, urged other political groups and residents to join the coalition to achieve inclusive governance for the state’s collective benefit.
Modibbo further urged opposition parties in the state yet to be part of the coalition to join the movement to fortify the coalition ahead of 2027.

For Labour Party chairman in the state, Mr Benjamin Abner, “this is the time to get the job done by mobilising massively to get new members and fortify ourselves for the task ahead.”


Abner urged party members to take membership drive seriously instead of waiting till 2027.


In a related development, Barde in company of Modibbo and other SDP stalwarts had on Thursday held similar meeting at Akko Local Government Area were they were received by mammoth crowd.

Barde urged the party supporters to embark on massive grassroots mobilisation across the LGA towards achieving the target of the coalition group in the state, adding that the APC was already scared of the coalition movement in the state.

2027: Coalition embarks on grassroots mobilisation to oust APC in Gombe

Continue Reading

Politics

Enemies at the Gate: The Manipulation of VP Shettima’s Statement at Adoke’s Book Launch

Published

on

VP Kashim Shettima

Enemies at the Gate: The Manipulation of VP Shettima’s Statement at Adoke’s Book Launch

By: Dr. James Bwala

In a democratic society, it is essential for leaders to express their opinions openly, but often, their words can be misinterpreted or manipulated for various reasons. Recently, Vice President Kashim Shettima made a statement at the book launch of former Attorney General Mohammed Adoke. This statement has drawn criticism and misrepresentation from some political opponents, particularly those who do not support President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s administration. Understanding why enemies of democracy would want to twist Shettima’s words is crucial in analyzing the current political climate in Nigeria. 

I took time to watch the mood and listen over and over to the words from the VP’s shared experiences. It is vital to recognize the broader context of politics in Nigeria. The country has faced significant challenges, including corruption, insecurity, and economic difficulties. Political opponents often seek to gain leverage by creating narratives that undermine the credibility of the current administration. By twisting Shettima’s statement, these adversaries aim to create a divide among the populace. They may hope that by sowing doubt about the vice president’s loyalty to President Tinubu, they can weaken the government’s stability and weaken support for their policies. 

Again, it is understandable that political rivals may deliberately misinterpret Shettima’s words to portray the Tinubu administration in a negative light. For instance, if they suggest that the vice president expressed disdain for a particular policy or decision, this can incite public outrage and foster resistance against the government. They understand that sensationalized narratives can easily spread, especially on social media, where misinformation can go viral. This manipulation creates a dangerous environment for democracy, where facts are overshadowed by distorted versions of events. 

In addition to undermining the current administration, twisting statements like Shettima’s story at the book launch can also serve to distract from pressing issues affecting the nation by redirecting public attention towards their evil intentions. This strategy benefits only those who wish to maintain the status quo or divert criticism from their inability to address significant societal challenges, and we see that coming from the coalators and their supporters. The manipulation of Vice President Shettima’s statement at Adoke’s book launch reflects a broader pattern of political maneuvering in Nigeria. Enemies of democracy often distort words to weaken the administration and distract the public from important issues. Understanding the motivations behind such actions is essential for citizens who wish to engage meaningfully in the democratic process. A well-informed public can differentiate between genuine concerns and politically motivated attacks, thereby strengthening democracy rather than undermining it. 

READ ALSO:https://newsng.ng/the-plight-of-farida/

It is undeniable that the political landscape in Nigeria has been marked by a whirlwind of speculations and controversies. Despite the efforts of those who seek to undermine the current administration, both President Tinubu and his Vice President Kashim Shettima have shown a remarkable commitment to good governance. Their ability to navigate through political challenges is critical in ensuring that the focus remains on improving the lives of Nigerian citizens rather than getting lost in the distractions created by opponents. 

The political climate is often filled with rumors and accusations that can easily divert attention from important governance issues. Some critics, often labeled as enemies of peace, thrive on chaos and uncertainty, hoping to fuel division and unrest. However, Tinubu and Shettima have demonstrated that they understand the nature of these challenges. They recognize that speculation can sometimes be a tool used to erode confidence in leadership. Instead of allowing these distractions to sway their decisions, they remain committed to their goals and the well-being of the nation. 

An example of their commitment to governance can be seen in their handling of economic issues. The economy of Nigeria has faced significant challenges, including inflation and unemployment. By focusing on policies that stimulate growth and create job opportunities, Tinubu and Shettima aim to instill a sense of optimism among the populace. Their administration has introduced initiatives aimed at improving infrastructure, supporting local businesses, and attracting foreign investments. Through these actions, they seek to create a stable environment that benefits all Nigerians. 

The administration’s approach to security illustrates their commitment to addressing critical issues facing the country. With the rise in insecurity, such as banditry and insurgency, they have prioritized national security and sought to implement sustainable strategies that ensure the safety of citizens. They understand that a secure environment is fundamental for any form of governance and development. While there may be adversities and threats from those who wish to see the presidency falter, President Tinubu and Vice President Shettima remain focused on their mission. They recognize the political games at play and continue to prioritize good governance above all else. Their commitment to economic growth, security, and the betterment of Nigeria showcases a leadership that is determined to rise above distractions and deliver results for the people. By concentrating on these priorities, they aim to create a peaceful and prosperous Nigeria, defying those who oppose progress. 

The role of a leader is often scrutinized by the public, especially when they share their past experiences. Kashim Shettima did so at the book launch. However, discussions emerging about the Vice President’s reflections on his time as the governor of Borno State under President Goodluck Jonathan are being twisted, manipulated, misused, and misinformed. Some are quick to interpret these reflections as signs of disloyalty to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. However, such interpretations often stem from misunderstanding or mischief rather than genuine criticism of the vice president’s intentions. 

The efforts of those who seek to derail the Tinubu and Shettima administration are rooted in a desire for political power and influence. Critics often argue that their policies are ineffective or detrimental to the country. However, it is essential to assess the administration’s achievements and initiatives that aim to improve the lives of Nigerians. The persistent attempts to undermine the administration often backfire. Instead of weakening the resolve of Tinubu and Shettima, these efforts seem to galvanize their support base. The leaders have continued to engage with the public, emphasizing transparency and accountability, which are vital for restoring trust in government. While critics may proclaim failure, the growing support from various sectors of society indicates that many believe in the vision presented by this administration. 

One could also consider that political dynamics are not fixed. Those days and now are not the same. The relationship between leaders can evolve based on the circumstances at hand. Historical examples from other countries demonstrate that past leaders have often supported each other while still advocating for their individual perspectives. For instance, leaders in various democratic nations have collaborated on initiatives even when they held different positions in government. The vice president’s memories and insights from his past governance do not imply disloyalty to President Tinubu. Instead, they reflect a commitment to learning from history and improving current governance practices. It is essential for the public to separate genuine discourse from mischief-driven narratives. 

* James Bwala, PhD, writes from Abuja.

Enemies at the Gate: The Manipulation of VP Shettima’s Statement at Adoke’s Book Launch

Continue Reading

Politics

Brazilian VP Visit: The leadership and humility in VP Kashim Shettima reaffirms the rich cultural heritage in Africa.

Published

on

VP Kashim Shettima during the Brazilian VP visit

Brazilian VP Visit: The leadership and humility in VP Kashim Shettima reaffirms the rich cultural heritage in Africa.

By: Dr. James Bwala

Vice President Kashim Shettima’s act of opening the car door for Brazilian Vice President Geraldo Alckmin symbolizes a profound demonstration of humility not only in political leadership but also drawing from the cultural and religious agreement to give respect to one another and especially the elderly. Such gestures, though seemingly minor, convey respect and equality among dignitaries, breaking conventional barriers often associated with hierarchical power structures. This behavior challenges traditional perceptions of authority by emphasizing service over status. 

The incident sparked mixed reactions online; while some critics argued that it was inappropriate for a high-ranking official to perform such a task, many praised Shettima’s conduct as an example of empathetic leadership. Humility in leadership fosters collaboration and mutual respect, qualities essential for effective diplomacy and governance. By prioritizing respectful interpersonal interactions, Shettima exemplifies how small acts can enhance diplomatic rapport and humanize political figures.

Kashim Shettima’s gesture goes beyond mere etiquette; it reflects an intentional embodiment of humility that contributes positively to international relations. His action serves as a reminder that leadership grounded in humility can bridge cultural divides and promote unity among global leaders.

I think those backlashing the vice president over his demonstrative humility fail to take a closer look at Kashim Shettima’s cultural and traditional upbringing. In many Nigerian communities, especially in the Northeast where Shettima hails from, cultural norms emphasize respect and humility as essential virtues. The phrase “Bakon Ka Annabin Ka,” which translates to “Your visitor is also your prophet,” encapsulates this ethos, underscoring the importance of honoring guests and valuing their presence regardless of status. This proverb reflects a deep-seated tradition of hospitality intertwined with reverence, which likely informs Shettima’s comportment.

From an academic perspective, understanding political figures through the lens of their sociocultural backgrounds provides richer insights into their behavior and leadership style. Demonstrative humility, often misunderstood in contemporary politics as weakness or insincerity, can instead be interpreted as an authentic expression rooted in cultural values. Thus, criticisms against Shettima overlook how his demeanor aligns with longstanding societal expectations that prioritize respectfulness and deference within communal interactions. 

READ ALSO: https://newsng.ng/the-plight-of-farida/

By appreciating this cultural context, one can better comprehend how Shettima’s actions resonate with the constituents who share these traditional values. This appreciation fosters a more nuanced dialogue about leadership qualities that transcend mere political performance, highlighting the intricate interplay between personal heritage and public service. In this light, the backlash against his humility appears less as a critique of personal character and more as a misunderstanding of the cultural narrative that shapes his public persona. Such misinterpretations not only risk alienating leaders from their communities but also diminish the richness of cultural diversity in political discourse. 

The cultural dimensions that inform leaders like Shettima to act as such are very rare. We can cultivate a more inclusive political environment that celebrates diversity and encourages genuine understanding across different societal norms. Recognizing the depth of cultural influences allows for a more empathetic and informed evaluation of leadership, where actions are seen not just in isolation but as part of a larger tapestry of inherited wisdom and community values. This perspective invites a shift from superficial judgments towards a deeper appreciation of how cultural heritage informs and enriches the leadership landscape. It is through this lens of cultural appreciation that we can begin to see humility not as a weakness, but as a profound strength that fosters unity and respect within diverse communities.

For emphasis sake, the act of Vice President Kashim Shettima exemplifies the deep-rooted humility embedded within African heritage and culture, particularly in the context of respecting elders. The Brazilian vice president, being an elderly man, received from Shettima a gesture that goes beyond mere protocol; it reflects a cultural ethos where reverence for age and status is paramount. Such humility is not only a personal virtue but also a communal value, central to African traditions where respect forms the foundation of social interactions. This behavior aligns with Shettima’s well-documented philosophy of humble service and consideration for others, which has been highlighted as characteristic of his leadership style. 

Those who dismiss these actions as insignificant or contrary to African values either misunderstand or lack the humaneness intrinsic to this culture. In essence, Shettima’s conduct reaffirms the rich cultural heritage that prioritizes dignity and respect in interpersonal relations.

* James Bwala, PhD, writes from Abuja.

Brazilian VP Visit: The leadership and humility in VP Kashim Shettima reaffirms the rich cultural heritage in Africa.

Continue Reading

Trending

Verified by MonsterInsights