Politics
2027: Nigeria Needs Issue-Based Political Discourse and Genuine Leadership
2027: Nigeria Needs Issue-Based Political Discourse and Genuine Leadership
By: Dr James Bwala
Going through the pages of newspapers, the drama that is taking over Nigeria’s approaches to the 2027 presidential elections is disconcerting. The pattern that dominates the political landscape speaks less of the personalities falling over themselves as the days unfolded. Politicians are fixated more on personal attacks and partisan squabbles than on substantive discussions about national challenges and solutions. This trend is not only counterproductive but also detrimental to Nigeria’s democratic progress and socio-economic development. For a country grappling with profound insecurity, widespread poverty, and pervasive corruption, the electorate deserves leaders who prioritise meaningful dialogue about policies and governance rather than engage in divisive rhetoric and political mudslinging.
The current state of political discourse reveals a troubling shift away from issue-based debates towards an obsession with personalities and irrelevant vendettas. A glaring example is the recent exchange between supporters of President Bola Tinubu and former Vice President Atiku Abubakar. When an Atiku supporter lambasted President Tinubu by questioning the public’s knowledge of his father, it exposed not only the pettiness of political arguments but also their irrelevance to the electorate’s pressing concerns. Ironically, the same critic forgets that Atiku himself has little public discourse about his own paternal background, underscoring how such personal attacks add no value to the presidential contest. More importantly, the lineage or parentage of these candidates bears absolutely no relevance to their ability to govern Nigeria effectively or address the nation’s myriad problems. Yet, this shallow focus distracts from urgent national issues that demand serious attention.
Similarly, Tinubu’s supporters have largely resorted to celebratory chants like “On your mandate we shall stand” instead of articulating and showcasing the tangible achievements or policy successes under the Tinubu-Shettima administration. Such displays may cultivate loyalty among core supporters but do little to persuade undecided voters or sceptics who seek evidence of competent governance. What Nigerians require are detailed outlines of policy frameworks and measurable progress reports on security, economic reforms, healthcare, education, and anti-corruption efforts—outcomes that directly impact daily lives. The absence of these critical conversations speaks volumes about the superficiality permeating political campaigns.
The disturbing episode involving Bishop Onayinkon and the Sultan of Sokoto further exemplifies the politics of distraction. While these revered figures occasionally become embroiled in political controversies, the essential “table” where politicians should lay down concrete plans remains conspicuously empty. Whether in the ruling party or the opposition, there is scant evidence of genuine engagement with the core issues undermining Nigeria’s stability and prosperity. Instead, time and resources are expended on symbolic gestures or media-driven theatrics rather than strategic policymaking and governance innovation.
As the opposition coalition attempts to regroup, with Atiku and Peter Obi supporters exploring alliances like the new G-100 coalition, numerous questions arise. For the new G-100 coalition, numerous questions loom large. Can these groups, historically divided by ideology and political ambition, genuinely reconcile and formulate a cohesive governance blueprint? Or will their efforts devolve into another round of factionalism and power struggles that fail to address Nigeria’s fundamental needs? The success or failure of such coalitions will significantly influence Nigeria’s political trajectory, underscoring the imperative for unity premised on substantive policy alignment rather than mere electoral arithmetic.
Giving this background, the broader socio-political context cannot be ignored. Nigeria’s challenges are deeply entrenched and multifaceted. Insecurity remains pervasive, with insurgency, banditry, kidnappings, and communal conflicts destabilising communities and eroding citizens’ confidence in government protection. Simultaneously, poverty continues to ravage millions, with economic inequality starkly visible in urban slums and rural hinterlands alike. Corruption, the perennial cancer afflicting governance structures, persists despite institutional anti-corruption agencies’ existence, largely due to weak enforcement, political interference, and lack of transparency.
Regrettably, government bodies tasked with combating these challenges have yet to deliver tangible results that speak at the grassroots level. Public trust in institutions is waning, and this vacuum often fuels apathy or cynicism during elections. Adding to the complexity, grassroots conversations across Nigerian towns and villages reveal a palpable anxiety about the future. Voters whisper tentative plans, alliances, and expectations ahead of 2027, signifying both hope and uncertainty. These silent discourses often escape mainstream political narratives but are crucial indicators of public sentiment and priorities.
From all indications, a critical juncture lies ahead. The political actors have a clear choice: continue with self-serving battles and distractions that risk further destabilising Nigeria’s fragile democracy, or rise above partisan bickering to offer authentic leadership grounded in ideas, solutions, and national interest. Nigerians deserve a “full table” of ideas—a comprehensive agenda addressing insecurity, poverty alleviation, systemic corruption, economic diversification, infrastructure development, education reform, and social cohesion. Without this, the elections risk becoming a mere spectacle of personalities rather than a genuine exercise in democratic renewal.
The fact remains that the 2027 Nigerian presidential elections must transcend the current culture of personal attacks and symbolic posturing. For Nigeria to progress, politicians must shift focus from criticising each other’s lineage or engaging in hollow celebrations to presenting substantive plans that respond to the nation’s critical challenges. The electorate deserves leaders who speak boldly about what they can contribute to Nigeria’s development and who demonstrate commitment to transparent governance and inclusive growth. Only through such a transformation in political discourse can Nigeria hope to build a more secure, prosperous, and united future. The days ahead will reveal whether Nigerian politicians choose to build bridges or deepen divisions—but the stakes could not be higher for the country and its people.
- James Bwala, PhD, writes from Abuja.
- 2027: Nigeria Needs Issue-Based Political Discourse and Genuine Leadership
Politics
Kashim Shettima: Dirty Datti and his Tinubu cap theory
Kashim Shettima: Dirty Datti and his Tinubu cap theory
By: Dr James Bwala
The controversy surrounding Vice President Kashim Shettima’s political symbolism has recently gained renewed attention following remarks by Datti Baba Ahmed, who questioned Shettima’s authenticity by asserting that he does not wear the Asiwaju cap—a potent emblem associated with political allegiance to President Tinubu and his Renewed Hope agenda. Baba Ahmed further challenged observers to enquire why Shettima refrains from donning this symbolic headgear and cited purported advice from Marabouts discouraging him from doing so.
Well, let’s just say that politics is here again and big men lie for cheap gains. Datti Baba Ahmed did not do his homework well to start attacking Nigeria’s vice president, Kashim Shettima, for not wearing President Tinubu’s cap as he alleged. Let me also assure Malam Datti Baba Ahmed, the Mauritanian boy from a Marabouts clan, that the APC is not a cult organisation that requires marabouting to see vision, and Kashim Shettima is not a figure that pretends loyalty or demonstrates such by constantly following what others choose to do for themselves.
The dirty Datti theory and claims overlook the visible reality. VP Shettima indeed wears the Asiwaju cap at public events and actively promotes the administration’s vision for national renewal, thereby aligning himself with Tinubu’s political identity. While Dattigan’s style reveals a deeper struggle over narrative control and political loyalty within Nigeria’s evolving power dynamics, he often misses the point when he makes attempts on Nigeria’s vice president, Kashim Shettima. We know his history and respect his family, but he keeps dragging them into his political mud. Attacking Shettima will only open a can of worms about the dirty Mauritanian journey to Nigeria, something we do not want to discuss out of respect for the larger Baba Ahmed’s family.
However, there is a debate regarding Shettima’s use of the Asiwaju cap. Datti wants to draw that it transcends mere fashion, and it encapsulates questions of symbolism, representation, and perceived commitment to a collective political project. Contrary to Datti Baba Ahmed’s assertions, Vice President Shettima’s actions represent more than just the act of wearing a cap. His consistent public appearances as Nigeria’s vice president demonstrate not only his visible endorsement of President Tinubu’s Renewed Hope agenda but also challenge the notion that only wearing Asiwaju’s cap speaks loyalty.
Vice President Kashim Shettima embodies a rich cultural heritage that is deeply rooted in the Kanuri ethnic identity and lineage from the historic El-Kanemi dynasty. This background not only shapes his personal character but also informs his political demeanour and leadership style, distinguishing him as a well-cultured personality within Nigeria’s complex socio-political landscape. Contrary to some criticisms levelled by figures such as Datti Baba Ahmed, who question Shettima’s prolonged tenure and political relevance, it is essential to recognise that Shettima’s identity transcends mere political positioning; it reflects a profound connection to his cultural roots and values. Shettima’s modernist approach to life and relationships that prioritise self-reliance and rational governance over traditional mystical practices did not align with Datti Baba Ahmed’s claims, which often hold sway in certain northern Nigerian communities, where the “Yan”bori Marabouting culture breathes.
The partnership between Bola Tinubu from the South West and Kashim Shettima from the North East symbolises more than just a political alliance of cap wearing; it represents an intentional fusion of diverse regional identities aimed at fostering national unity. This north-south alliance not only bridges ethnic and regional divides but also showcases a shared commitment to progressive governance grounded in cultural authenticity and mutual respect. Moreover, Shettima’s commitment to cultural integrity and pragmatic leadership underscores the strength of the Tinubu-Shettima partnership as a model for inclusive governance that respects Nigeria’s diverse ethnic fabric while advancing a forward-looking political agenda. This cultural authenticity, combined with a pragmatic and forward-thinking leadership style, enables Shettima to navigate the complexities of Nigerian politics without resorting to traditional or mystical shortcuts, thereby reinforcing his image as a modern statesman rooted in Kanuri heritage.
This synergy between Tinubu and Shettima not only exemplifies the political maturity needed to address Nigeria’s complex ethno-regional dynamics but also highlights how leaders grounded in their cultural identities can collaboratively drive national progress without succumbing to divisiveness or archaism.
- James Bwala, PhD, writes from Abuja
- Kashim Shettima: Dirty Datti and his Tinubu cap theory
Politics
2027: Borno will never witness another Gubio tragedy
2027: Borno will never witness another Gubio tragedy
By: Dr. James Bwala
The recent ambush on Hon. Mustapha Gubio’s convoy, the All Progressives Congress (APC) governorship candidate in Borno State, by suspected ISWAP terrorists along the Gubio–Kareto–Damasak road has reignited fears about the ongoing insurgency in northeastern Nigeria. This incident not only highlights the security challenges that political figures face in areas plagued by militant violence but also brings back haunting memories of a similar tragedy from 2011.
Back then, another governorship candidate from Borno, the late Fannami Gubio, tragically lost his life on what became known as “Black Friday,” a day marred by political violence and chaos. The recurrence of such attacks reveals a disturbing trend where violent extremist groups disrupt political processes, aiming to undermine governance and democratic engagement.
The mixed reactions from news vendors and local communities reflect the complicated relationship between fear, resilience, and political involvement in conflict-affected regions. This latest attack serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing instability in Borno State and the pressing need for stronger security measures to protect not just political figures but also the wider civilian population caught in the crossfire of insurgency.
This incident underscores the persistent threat posed by ISWAP in the area and highlights the crucial need for continuous military vigilance and community collaboration to prevent such attacks from derailing the democratic process. In light of these events, it’s essential for both the government and security agencies to ramp up their efforts to dismantle terrorist networks in Borno State, ensuring that political activities can continue without the shadow of violence or intimidation looming over them.
The attack on Thursday highlights the persistent challenges that political figures in Borno State are grappling with, as insurgent groups like ISWAP take advantage of security weaknesses to disrupt elections and instill fear in both candidates and voters. This troubling trend of repeated assaults along vital routes, such as the Gubio–Kareto–Damasak road, not only jeopardizes the safety of political leaders like Mustapha Gubio but also hampers crucial transportation and economic activities. This situation calls for a robust strategy that tackles the underlying causes of insurgency, encourages socio-economic growth, and promotes inclusive governance to pave the way for lasting peace in Borno State.
To strengthen these efforts, it’s essential for the government to improve intelligence gathering and foster community engagement initiatives that empower local residents to become vigilant partners in security. This approach can help shrink the operational space for insurgents like ISWAP. To genuinely protect the democratic process and safeguard candidates like Mustapha Gubio, security agencies must not only react quickly to attacks but also adopt proactive measures that incorporate local intelligence and community collaboration to prevent future threats.
While the immediate response to the recent attack was commendable, it’s evident that without ongoing and coordinated efforts that blend military vigilance with community resilience and development programs, such incidents will keep undermining the stability of Borno State. Achieving lasting peace in Borno State hinges on ensuring that military actions are paired with continuous community engagement and socio-economic development initiatives that address the root issues exploited by insurgent groups.
James Bwala, PhD, writes from Abuja
2027: Borno will never witness another Gubio tragedy
Politics
APC received 5000 decampees in Yobe
APC received 5000 decampees in Yobe
By: Yahaya Wakili
Yobe State All Progressives Congress (APC) has received 5,000 decampees from various political parties across the Yobe South Senatorial District (Zone B).
The All Progressives Congress receives defectors from the New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP), Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), and African Democratic Congress (ADC). The decampments are drawn from the Nangere, Fika, Potiskum, and Nangere local government areas.

Governor Mai Mala Buni CON, COMN, of Yobe State, ably represented by his deputy, Hon. Idi Barde Gubana (Wazirin Fune), assured those who shifted their loyalty to APC would be treated equally with the old members, adding that the APC believes in one Nigeria.
He appreciated the All Progressives Congress (APC) supporters for their commitment to the growth of the party, which, according to him, enhanced service delivery to the people of the state.
The governor expressed delight at receiving the decampments from the various political parties into the All Progressives Congress (APC), the ruling party in the state and Nigeria in general.
The state party chairman, Alhaji Mohammed Gadaka (Madakin Gudi), called on the people of the other political parties to join the APC to move Yobe state forward and assured to carry the new members along in all the party activities.
Hajiya Budu Lawan, the APC women’s leader in the state, promised that women in Yobe state would come out in mass to support and vote for the APC in the upcoming general election.
Hon. Musa Gulani, the state youth leader, expressed his appreciation for the youth in Zone B, adding that youth in Yobe state would vote for APC from top to bottom in the 2027 general election.
The APC governorship candidate, Alhaji Baba Mallam Wali mni (BMW), ably represented by his running mate, Hon. Sale Samanja, said, “If elected in 2027, we would uphold the legacies of Governor Mai Mala Buni. “
Hon. Yakubu Shehu Damagum (alias Yakubu Doctor), State chairman of the New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP), said, “I left the party last year due to some circumstances, but I didn’t join the APC officially till today.”
He said, “The reason behind my defection is that I watched the development strides in Yobe state under the APC administration of Governor Mai Mala Buni, and there is no need to continue fighting with the ruling party, because a small party in Yobe state has no impact.”
Abba Balube, a former chairman of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) from the Fune local government area, revealed that he decided to leave the ADC completely because of the bad leadership and because there is no respect in the party.
Ali DPO, former chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Potiskum local government area, said he joined APC, the ruling party in the state, because of Governor Mai Mala Buni’s transparency, especially the equal sharing of the developmental projects and employment across the state. The event ended up with the presentation of plagues to decampers.
APC received 5000 decampees in Yobe
-
News2 years agoRoger Federer’s Shock as DNA Results Reveal Myla and Charlene Are Not His Biological Children
-
Opinions5 years agoTHE PLIGHT OF FARIDA
-
News1 year agoFAILED COUP IN BURKINA FASO: HOW TRAORÉ NARROWLY ESCAPED ASSASSINATION PLOT AMID FOREIGN INTERFERENCE CLAIMS
-
News2 years agoEYN: Rev. Billi, Distortion of History, and The Living Tamarind Tree
-
Opinions5 years agoPOLICE CHARGE ROOMS, A MINTING PRESS
-
ACADEMICS3 years agoA History of Biu” (2015) and The Lingering Bura-Pabir Question (1)
-
Columns3 years agoArmy University Biu: There is certain interest, but certainly not from Borno.
-
Politics1 year ago2027: Why Hon. Midala Balami Must Go, as Youths in Hawul and Asikira/Uba Federal Constituency Reject ₦500,000 as Sallah Gift
