Politics
2027: Why Hon. Midala Balami Must Go, as Youths in Hawul and Asikira/Uba Federal Constituency Reject ₦500,000 as Sallah Gift

2027: Why Hon. Midala Balami Must Go, as Youths in Hawul and Asikira/Uba Federal Constituency Reject ₦500,000 as Sallah Gift
By: Dr. James Bwala
The youths of Hawul and Askira/Uba Federal Constituency have expressed significant regret over their decision to vote for Hon. Midala Balami of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) as their representative in the Green Chamber. This sentiment stems from perceived unfulfilled campaign promises and a lack of tangible development projects within the constituency since his assumption of office. Many youths feel marginalized, claiming that their concerns regarding education, employment, and infrastructure remain largely unaddressed.
This disillusionment reflects a broader trend among Nigerian youth, who increasingly demand accountability and effective representation from their elected officials. The initial optimism accompanying Balami’s election has given way to frustration due to inadequate legislative performance and limited engagement with constituents’ needs. While legal disputes affirmed his election victory, these judicial endorsements have done little to alleviate grassroots dissatisfaction. Consequently, the youths’ regret underscores the urgent need for responsive governance that prioritizes community development and inclusivity.
The youth’s declaration that Hon. Midala Balami must not represent them again in 2027 reflects a growing dissatisfaction with political leadership and representation. This sentiment underscores the critical importance of responsive governance, where elected officials are expected to address the evolving needs and aspirations of their constituents. Young people, as a dynamic demographic, demand accountability and tangible progress, which they feel has been lacking under Hon. Balami’s tenure. Such discontent is emblematic of broader challenges in democratic participation, where trust between representatives and the represented is paramount.
This call for change highlights the role of youth engagement in shaping political futures. The rejection of a previously favored representative suggests an increased political awareness among young voters who prioritize performance over loyalty or tradition. It also indicates their desire for leaders who embody transparency, inclusivity, and innovation—qualities necessary for addressing contemporary socio-economic issues. As such, the youths’ stance serves as a potent reminder that political legitimacy hinges on continued relevance and responsiveness to constituent demands.
The youths in Hawul and Askira/Uba federal constituency who are insisting that Hon. Midala Balami should not represent them again by 2027 exemplify a critical shift toward active civic participation and heightened expectations from political figures. It emphasizes the need for politicians to maintain genuine engagement with younger populations to sustain democratic vitality and social cohesion. Failure to do so risks alienation of key demographics crucial for future governance and national development.
According to the youths, a senator from Osun State has revealed that Nigerian senators receive ₦2 billion while members of the House of Representatives collect ₦1 billion for constituency projects. Despite these substantial allocations, there is a glaring absence of tangible development within their constituencies. This disclosure highlights a critical discrepancy between funds disbursed and actual infrastructural or social improvements on the ground. Such revelations have intensified public scrutiny regarding transparency and accountability in legislative financial management.
The implications of this exposé are profound, as it underscores systemic challenges in governance and resource utilization within Nigeria’s political framework. The youths’ concerns reflect widespread disillusionment with elected officials who seem to prioritize personal enrichment over community development. This situation calls for robust mechanisms to monitor expenditure and ensure that constituency funds translate into meaningful progress. Ultimately, addressing these issues is essential for restoring public confidence and enhancing democratic governance.
READ ALSO: https://newsng.ng/how-shettimas-foreign-engagements-position-nigeria-among-progressive-nations/
Democracy in Northern Borno State appears to yield tangible benefits, particularly through the efforts of their representatives. However, only Hon. Betara Aliyu, the representative of Biu, Kwaya, Bayo, and Shani constituencies in southern Borno, seemed to have signed a deal to represent his constituency. His active involvement in legislative and developmental initiatives has brought noticeable dividends to his constituency, contrasting sharply with the other southern Borno representatives, who remain largely absent in representations of their people. This disparity underscores a broader issue within regional governance and resource allocation that affects equitable development.
The northern Borno constituencies have experienced infrastructural improvements and increased political attention due to effective representation. Conversely, the southern areas suffer from neglect and lack of meaningful democratic engagement beyond Hon. Betara Aliyu’s contributions. This uneven distribution challenges the foundational democratic principle of equal representation and calls for more inclusive policies that address the continued stagnation in southern Borno by its own representatives.
The viral video depicting the rejection of Hon. Midala Balami’s Sallah gift of ₦500,000 by constituents, who expressed their dissent with the Hausa phrase “Bamayi,” meaning “We are not doing it again,” serves as a profound manifestation of political discontent. This incident underscores a significant disconnect between the elected representative and his electorate, highlighting the latter’s dissatisfaction with his performance in the Green Chamber. The outright refusal of monetary compensation symbolizes a deeper repudiation of his legitimacy and effectiveness as a public servant.
Such public displays of rejection are indicative of broader socio-political dynamics where citizens demand accountability and genuine representation rather than superficial gestures. The phrase “Bamayi” encapsulates a collective sentiment that transcends mere opposition; it reflects an active decision to withdraw support from Hon. Balami’s leadership. This event thus becomes emblematic of democratic engagement, wherein constituents assert their right to evaluate and respond critically to their representatives’ actions.
The viral video is not merely about rejecting financial aid but represents an emphatic declaration against perceived inadequate representation in governance structures. It challenges politicians to introspect on their roles and prioritize meaningful service delivery over tokenistic offerings.
Hon. Midala Balami, as the representative of the Askira-Uba/Hawul Federal Constituency, has received constituency allocations aimed at fostering development within these regions. However, there remains a pressing need for transparency regarding how these funds have been utilized to address the socio-economic challenges faced by the constituents. Constituency allocations are critical for local infrastructure, education, healthcare, and economic empowerment projects; thus, accountability in their deployment is essential to ensure tangible improvements.
The lack of detailed public information on Hon. Balami’s specific initiatives or projects funded by these allocations raises concerns among stakeholders and constituents alike. Given that effective governance requires openness and responsiveness to public inquiries, it is imperative that Hon. Balami provide a comprehensive explanation detailing his achievements or ongoing efforts in Hawul and Askira/Uba with respect to the constituency funds allocated to him. Such an explanation would not only enhance trust but also enable informed civic engagement within the constituency.
I am also a youth in this area. I believe that transparency concerning the management of constituency allocations by Hon. Midala Balami is crucial for democratic accountability and sustainable development in Hawul and Askira/Uba. Clear communication about fund utilization will foster confidence among constituents while promoting greater oversight of public resources.
James Bwala, PhD, writes from Abuja.
2027: Why Hon. Midala Balami Must Go, as Youths in Hawul and Asikira/Uba Federal Constituency Reject ₦500,000 as Sallah Gift
Politics
2027: Coalition embarks on grassroots mobilisation to oust APC in Gombe

2027: Coalition embarks on grassroots mobilisation to oust APC in Gombe
Some opposition party members in Gombe State under the auspices of Gombe State Working Group have called on its members to work together to achieve success in 2027 elections and unseat the All Progressives Congress (APC)-led government of Gov. Inuwa Yahaya.
Mr Jibrin Barde, Peoples Democratic Party (PDP)’s 2023 governorship candidate who stated this at a stakeholders’ meeting held in Gombe on Friday, said the coalition would only succeed when they work in unity and put personal interest aside.
Barde expressed optimism that the opposition coalition would defeat the ruling APC in the next general elections.
He emphasised the need for all members to embrace unity to achieve the lofty aspirations of their movement, stressing that harnessing collective strength of the coalition would help them achieve their goal.
He stated that the coalition movement was not about individuals, hence admonished the stakeholders to prioritise the collective interest of the fold above all else.
Barde described the APC government in Gombe as “incompetent and insensitive,” accusing it of failing to improve residents’ welfare and overall governance.
“The APC has failed in Gombe State and we can not allow them to continue their misrule which would further inflict pain on residents.
“We are here to bring better days and ensure a brighter future for all our citizens; this is why we want power to change the narrative for the good of the people,” he said.
Barde stressed the importance of mobilising grassroots politicians and leaders of thought to fortify the movement towards entrenching good governance in Gombe State.
Also speaking, Mr Adamu Modibbo, Social Democratic Party (SDP) chairman in the state, urged other political groups and residents to join the coalition to achieve inclusive governance for the state’s collective benefit.
Modibbo further urged opposition parties in the state yet to be part of the coalition to join the movement to fortify the coalition ahead of 2027.
For Labour Party chairman in the state, Mr Benjamin Abner, “this is the time to get the job done by mobilising massively to get new members and fortify ourselves for the task ahead.”
Abner urged party members to take membership drive seriously instead of waiting till 2027.
In a related development, Barde in company of Modibbo and other SDP stalwarts had on Thursday held similar meeting at Akko Local Government Area were they were received by mammoth crowd.
Barde urged the party supporters to embark on massive grassroots mobilisation across the LGA towards achieving the target of the coalition group in the state, adding that the APC was already scared of the coalition movement in the state.
2027: Coalition embarks on grassroots mobilisation to oust APC in Gombe
Politics
Enemies at the Gate: The Manipulation of VP Shettima’s Statement at Adoke’s Book Launch

Enemies at the Gate: The Manipulation of VP Shettima’s Statement at Adoke’s Book Launch
By: Dr. James Bwala
In a democratic society, it is essential for leaders to express their opinions openly, but often, their words can be misinterpreted or manipulated for various reasons. Recently, Vice President Kashim Shettima made a statement at the book launch of former Attorney General Mohammed Adoke. This statement has drawn criticism and misrepresentation from some political opponents, particularly those who do not support President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s administration. Understanding why enemies of democracy would want to twist Shettima’s words is crucial in analyzing the current political climate in Nigeria.

I took time to watch the mood and listen over and over to the words from the VP’s shared experiences. It is vital to recognize the broader context of politics in Nigeria. The country has faced significant challenges, including corruption, insecurity, and economic difficulties. Political opponents often seek to gain leverage by creating narratives that undermine the credibility of the current administration. By twisting Shettima’s statement, these adversaries aim to create a divide among the populace. They may hope that by sowing doubt about the vice president’s loyalty to President Tinubu, they can weaken the government’s stability and weaken support for their policies.



Again, it is understandable that political rivals may deliberately misinterpret Shettima’s words to portray the Tinubu administration in a negative light. For instance, if they suggest that the vice president expressed disdain for a particular policy or decision, this can incite public outrage and foster resistance against the government. They understand that sensationalized narratives can easily spread, especially on social media, where misinformation can go viral. This manipulation creates a dangerous environment for democracy, where facts are overshadowed by distorted versions of events.
In addition to undermining the current administration, twisting statements like Shettima’s story at the book launch can also serve to distract from pressing issues affecting the nation by redirecting public attention towards their evil intentions. This strategy benefits only those who wish to maintain the status quo or divert criticism from their inability to address significant societal challenges, and we see that coming from the coalators and their supporters. The manipulation of Vice President Shettima’s statement at Adoke’s book launch reflects a broader pattern of political maneuvering in Nigeria. Enemies of democracy often distort words to weaken the administration and distract the public from important issues. Understanding the motivations behind such actions is essential for citizens who wish to engage meaningfully in the democratic process. A well-informed public can differentiate between genuine concerns and politically motivated attacks, thereby strengthening democracy rather than undermining it.
READ ALSO:https://newsng.ng/the-plight-of-farida/
It is undeniable that the political landscape in Nigeria has been marked by a whirlwind of speculations and controversies. Despite the efforts of those who seek to undermine the current administration, both President Tinubu and his Vice President Kashim Shettima have shown a remarkable commitment to good governance. Their ability to navigate through political challenges is critical in ensuring that the focus remains on improving the lives of Nigerian citizens rather than getting lost in the distractions created by opponents.



The political climate is often filled with rumors and accusations that can easily divert attention from important governance issues. Some critics, often labeled as enemies of peace, thrive on chaos and uncertainty, hoping to fuel division and unrest. However, Tinubu and Shettima have demonstrated that they understand the nature of these challenges. They recognize that speculation can sometimes be a tool used to erode confidence in leadership. Instead of allowing these distractions to sway their decisions, they remain committed to their goals and the well-being of the nation.
An example of their commitment to governance can be seen in their handling of economic issues. The economy of Nigeria has faced significant challenges, including inflation and unemployment. By focusing on policies that stimulate growth and create job opportunities, Tinubu and Shettima aim to instill a sense of optimism among the populace. Their administration has introduced initiatives aimed at improving infrastructure, supporting local businesses, and attracting foreign investments. Through these actions, they seek to create a stable environment that benefits all Nigerians.
The administration’s approach to security illustrates their commitment to addressing critical issues facing the country. With the rise in insecurity, such as banditry and insurgency, they have prioritized national security and sought to implement sustainable strategies that ensure the safety of citizens. They understand that a secure environment is fundamental for any form of governance and development. While there may be adversities and threats from those who wish to see the presidency falter, President Tinubu and Vice President Shettima remain focused on their mission. They recognize the political games at play and continue to prioritize good governance above all else. Their commitment to economic growth, security, and the betterment of Nigeria showcases a leadership that is determined to rise above distractions and deliver results for the people. By concentrating on these priorities, they aim to create a peaceful and prosperous Nigeria, defying those who oppose progress.
The role of a leader is often scrutinized by the public, especially when they share their past experiences. Kashim Shettima did so at the book launch. However, discussions emerging about the Vice President’s reflections on his time as the governor of Borno State under President Goodluck Jonathan are being twisted, manipulated, misused, and misinformed. Some are quick to interpret these reflections as signs of disloyalty to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. However, such interpretations often stem from misunderstanding or mischief rather than genuine criticism of the vice president’s intentions.
The efforts of those who seek to derail the Tinubu and Shettima administration are rooted in a desire for political power and influence. Critics often argue that their policies are ineffective or detrimental to the country. However, it is essential to assess the administration’s achievements and initiatives that aim to improve the lives of Nigerians. The persistent attempts to undermine the administration often backfire. Instead of weakening the resolve of Tinubu and Shettima, these efforts seem to galvanize their support base. The leaders have continued to engage with the public, emphasizing transparency and accountability, which are vital for restoring trust in government. While critics may proclaim failure, the growing support from various sectors of society indicates that many believe in the vision presented by this administration.

One could also consider that political dynamics are not fixed. Those days and now are not the same. The relationship between leaders can evolve based on the circumstances at hand. Historical examples from other countries demonstrate that past leaders have often supported each other while still advocating for their individual perspectives. For instance, leaders in various democratic nations have collaborated on initiatives even when they held different positions in government. The vice president’s memories and insights from his past governance do not imply disloyalty to President Tinubu. Instead, they reflect a commitment to learning from history and improving current governance practices. It is essential for the public to separate genuine discourse from mischief-driven narratives.
* James Bwala, PhD, writes from Abuja.
Enemies at the Gate: The Manipulation of VP Shettima’s Statement at Adoke’s Book Launch
Politics
Brazilian VP Visit: The leadership and humility in VP Kashim Shettima reaffirms the rich cultural heritage in Africa.

Brazilian VP Visit: The leadership and humility in VP Kashim Shettima reaffirms the rich cultural heritage in Africa.
By: Dr. James Bwala
Vice President Kashim Shettima’s act of opening the car door for Brazilian Vice President Geraldo Alckmin symbolizes a profound demonstration of humility not only in political leadership but also drawing from the cultural and religious agreement to give respect to one another and especially the elderly. Such gestures, though seemingly minor, convey respect and equality among dignitaries, breaking conventional barriers often associated with hierarchical power structures. This behavior challenges traditional perceptions of authority by emphasizing service over status.
The incident sparked mixed reactions online; while some critics argued that it was inappropriate for a high-ranking official to perform such a task, many praised Shettima’s conduct as an example of empathetic leadership. Humility in leadership fosters collaboration and mutual respect, qualities essential for effective diplomacy and governance. By prioritizing respectful interpersonal interactions, Shettima exemplifies how small acts can enhance diplomatic rapport and humanize political figures.
Kashim Shettima’s gesture goes beyond mere etiquette; it reflects an intentional embodiment of humility that contributes positively to international relations. His action serves as a reminder that leadership grounded in humility can bridge cultural divides and promote unity among global leaders.
I think those backlashing the vice president over his demonstrative humility fail to take a closer look at Kashim Shettima’s cultural and traditional upbringing. In many Nigerian communities, especially in the Northeast where Shettima hails from, cultural norms emphasize respect and humility as essential virtues. The phrase “Bakon Ka Annabin Ka,” which translates to “Your visitor is also your prophet,” encapsulates this ethos, underscoring the importance of honoring guests and valuing their presence regardless of status. This proverb reflects a deep-seated tradition of hospitality intertwined with reverence, which likely informs Shettima’s comportment.
From an academic perspective, understanding political figures through the lens of their sociocultural backgrounds provides richer insights into their behavior and leadership style. Demonstrative humility, often misunderstood in contemporary politics as weakness or insincerity, can instead be interpreted as an authentic expression rooted in cultural values. Thus, criticisms against Shettima overlook how his demeanor aligns with longstanding societal expectations that prioritize respectfulness and deference within communal interactions.
READ ALSO: https://newsng.ng/the-plight-of-farida/
By appreciating this cultural context, one can better comprehend how Shettima’s actions resonate with the constituents who share these traditional values. This appreciation fosters a more nuanced dialogue about leadership qualities that transcend mere political performance, highlighting the intricate interplay between personal heritage and public service. In this light, the backlash against his humility appears less as a critique of personal character and more as a misunderstanding of the cultural narrative that shapes his public persona. Such misinterpretations not only risk alienating leaders from their communities but also diminish the richness of cultural diversity in political discourse.
The cultural dimensions that inform leaders like Shettima to act as such are very rare. We can cultivate a more inclusive political environment that celebrates diversity and encourages genuine understanding across different societal norms. Recognizing the depth of cultural influences allows for a more empathetic and informed evaluation of leadership, where actions are seen not just in isolation but as part of a larger tapestry of inherited wisdom and community values. This perspective invites a shift from superficial judgments towards a deeper appreciation of how cultural heritage informs and enriches the leadership landscape. It is through this lens of cultural appreciation that we can begin to see humility not as a weakness, but as a profound strength that fosters unity and respect within diverse communities.
For emphasis sake, the act of Vice President Kashim Shettima exemplifies the deep-rooted humility embedded within African heritage and culture, particularly in the context of respecting elders. The Brazilian vice president, being an elderly man, received from Shettima a gesture that goes beyond mere protocol; it reflects a cultural ethos where reverence for age and status is paramount. Such humility is not only a personal virtue but also a communal value, central to African traditions where respect forms the foundation of social interactions. This behavior aligns with Shettima’s well-documented philosophy of humble service and consideration for others, which has been highlighted as characteristic of his leadership style.
Those who dismiss these actions as insignificant or contrary to African values either misunderstand or lack the humaneness intrinsic to this culture. In essence, Shettima’s conduct reaffirms the rich cultural heritage that prioritizes dignity and respect in interpersonal relations.
* James Bwala, PhD, writes from Abuja.
Brazilian VP Visit: The leadership and humility in VP Kashim Shettima reaffirms the rich cultural heritage in Africa.
-
News1 year ago
Roger Federer’s Shock as DNA Results Reveal Myla and Charlene Are Not His Biological Children
-
Opinions3 years ago
THE PLIGHT OF FARIDA
-
Opinions4 years ago
POLICE CHARGE ROOMS, A MINTING PRESS
-
News1 year ago
EYN: Rev. Billi, Distortion of History, and The Living Tamarind Tree
-
Columns1 year ago
Army University Biu: There is certain interest, but certainly not from Borno.
-
ACADEMICS1 year ago
A History of Biu” (2015) and The Lingering Bura-Pabir Question (1)
-
Opinions1 year ago
Tinubu,Shettima: The epidemic of economic, insecurity in Nigeria
-
Politics11 months ago
Kashim Shettima: Of Sentiments, Their Opinions, and the 21 billion Naira VP’s Official Resident