International
Biden hits Russia with sanctions, shifts troops to Germany
Biden hits Russia with sanctions, shifts troops to Germany
President Joe Biden hit back Thursday against Russia’s invation of Ukraine, unleashing robust new sanctions, ordering the deployment of thousands of additional troops to NATO ally Germany and declaring that America would stand up to Russia’s Vladimir Putin.
As for the Russian president, Biden said: “He’s going to test the resolve of the west o see if we stay together. And we will.”
Targeting Russia’s financial system, Biden said, the United States will block assets of large Russian banks, i mpose export controls aimed at the nation’s high-tech needs and sanction its business oligarchs.
The president said the U.S. also will be deploying additional forces to Germany to bolster NATO after the invation of Ukraine, which is not a member of the defense organization. Some 7,000 additional U.S. troops will be sent.
Some U.S. lawmakers — and Ukrainian officials — called on Biden to do more.
“There is more that we can and should do,” said Sen Bob Menendez, D-N.J., the chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, pointing to the possibility of removing Russian banks from the SWIFT international banking system and sanctioning Putin personally. “Congress and the Biden administration must not shy away from any options.”
Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell expressed support Thursday for Biden’s latest moves but also urged Biden to apply maximum pressure on Putin. McConnell said the top four congressional leaders in the House and Senate received a classified briefing from the president late Thursday.
“We’re all together at this point and we need to be together about what should be done,” McConnell said. “But I have some advice: Ratchet the sanctions all the way up. Don’t hold any back.”
White House deputy national security adviser Daleep Singh stressed that the Biden administration valued closed coordination with allies and avoiding even the perception of hurting ordinary Russian citizens as they roll out sanctions. He declined to detail a circumstance in which Biden might approve cutting the Russians off from SWIFT or target Putin directly.
“When we consider which sanctions to apply, we’re not cowboys and cowgirls pressing a button to impose costs,” Singh said. “We follow a set of principles. We want the sanctions to be impactful enough to demonstrate our resolve, and to show that we have the capacity to deliver overwhelming costs to Russia.”
Biden declared that Putin, who has referred to the collapse of the Soviet Union as the “greatest geopolitical catastrophe” of the past century, is looking beyond Ukraine.
“He has much larger ambitions,” Biden said. “He wants to, in fact, reestablish the former Soviet Union. That’s what this is about.”
The penalties announced Thursday fall in line with the White House’s insistence that it would hit Russia’s financial system and Putin’s inner circle, while also imposing export controls that would aim to starve Russia’s industries and military of U.S. semiconductors and other high-tech products.
“Putin is the aggressor,” Biden said. “Putin chose this war, and now he and his country will bear the consequences.”
But Biden, for now, held off imposing some of the most severe potential sanctions, including cutting Russia out of the SWIFT payment system, which allows for the transfers of money from bank to bank around the globe.
Biden announced the sanctions at the White House while Ukraine’s government reported mounting casualties inflicted by Russian forces attacking from the east, north and south.
Oil and natural prices have already surged over concerns that Russia — an energy production behemoth — will slow the flow of oil and natural gas to Europe. Biden, however, acknowledged the sanctions are “going to take time” to have their effect on the Russian economy.
Biden added that after Russia’s “brutal assault” against Ukraine it would be a mistake to allow Putin’s actions to go unanswered. He said if they did, “the consequences for America would be much worse.”
“America stands up to bullies, we stand up for freedom,” Biden said. “This is who we are.”
Biden spoke hours after holding a virtual meeting with the leaders of Britain, Canada, France, Italy and Japan. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, European Council President Charles Michel and NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg also joined the meeting.
The president also met with his national security team in the White House Situation Room as he looked to flesh out U.S. moves in the rapidly escalating crisis.
The White House said Biden would meet Friday morning with other NATO heads of state “in an extraordinary virtual summit to discuss the security situation in and around Ukraine.”Vice president Kamala Harris will meet virtually with leaders of eastern flank NATO members, including nations like Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania that gained independence when the Soviet Union broke up in 1991.
While Biden described the sanctions as severe, Ukrainian officials urged the U.S. and West to go further.
“We demand the disconnection of Russia from SWIFT, the introduction of a no-fly zone over Ukraine and other effective steps to stop the aggressor,” Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said in a tweet.
The Biden administration, however, has shown some reluctance to cut Russia from SWIFT, at least immediately, because of concerns the move could also have enormous ramifications for Europe and other Western economies. Biden, answering questions from reporters, appeared to push a decision on SWIFT to European allies.
“It is always an option but right now that’s not the position that the rest of Europe wishes to take,” Biden said. He also contended that the financial sanctions he announced would be more damaging to Russia.
READ ALSO: INEC Redeploys 186 Staff, Ahead Of 2023 Election
The Belgium-headquartered system allows for tens of millions of transactions daily among banks, financial exchanges and other institutions. The U.S. notably has previously blocked Iran from the system because of its nuclear program.
Officials in Europe have noted that the loss of SWIFT access by Russia could be a drag on the broader global economy. Russia has also equated a SWIFT ban to a declaration of war. And because the system cements the importance of the U.S. dollar in global finance, outright bans also carry the risk of pushing countries to use alternatives through the Chinese government or blockchain-based technologies.
Brian Frey, a former Justice Department prosecutor during the Trump administration, said while SWIFT is the primary messaging system for financial payments, “there are alternatives to the system” and cutting Russia off would create a “splashback and immediate problems for the international community.”
The sanctions include targeting Russia’s two largest banks, Sberbank and VTB Bank. The U.S. Treasury Department says the sanctions overall “target nearly 80% of all banking assets in Russia and will have a deep and long-lasting effect on the Russian economy and financial system.”
Individuals close to Putin were also targeted in the latest sanctions. They include former chief of staff Sergei Ivanov; Andrey Patrushev, a Putin ally who has held high-ranking positions at the state-owned Gazprom Neft; and former Deputy Prime Minister Igor Sechin, chairman of the management board of the oil company Rosneft.
Treasury also announced sanctions against Belarusian banks, the country’s defense industry and security officials over support for the Russian invation of Ukraine.
Biden said the export control measures he ordered would “impose severe cost on the Russian economy, both immediately and over time.” The measures will restrict Russia access to semiconductors, computers, telecommunications, information security equipment, lasers and sensors.
“We’re going to impair their ability to compete in a high-tech 21st century economy,” Biden said.
Meanwhile, Russia’s second-ranking diplomat in Washington, Minister Counselor Sergey Trepelkov, was expelled in retaliation for the Russian expulsion of the No. 2 U.S. diplomat in Moscow earlier this month, a senior State Department official said Thursday.
The expulsion was unrelated to the invation and is part of a long-running dispute between Washington and Moscow over embassy staffing, the official said.
International
Ecological Distress in the Horn of Africa: Ethio‑Egyptian Hydropower Relations and the Strategic Significance of Hydropower Investments
Ecological Distress in the Horn of Africa: Ethio‑Egyptian Hydropower Relations and the Strategic Significance of Hydropower Investments
By: Yechale Degu
Over the past two decades, Ethiopia has invested heavily on hydropower as a means to accelerate energy access, economic growth, and development and ensure control of its water resources. Though not without political costs affecting its diplomatic ties, hydropower was planned as a central pillar of the country’s energy security. Despite persistent domestic shortfalls in extending electricity to rural communities, the initiative has achieved notable success. Ethiopia has emerged as a regional hydroelectric hub, supplying power to nearly all neighboring states, with prospects for expansion beyond the region, generating significant hydro-dollar in return.
The hydropower strength more acquired following the completion of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) represents a landmark achievement, overcoming colonial-era restrictions that limited upstream countries such as Ethiopia in managing their water resources. The dam’s completion, financed largely through domestic means, marked a breakthrough against financial constraints imposed by global financial architectures over financing of controversial projects like GERD.

Withstanding sustained diplomatic challenges from Egypt, a country with deeper international entrenchment than Ethiopia, and its allies and organizations Egypt associated with such as Arab League/AR and Organization of Islamic Cooperation/OIC, Ethiopia emerge as a regional or continental hydropower. The dam becomes a new magna carta governing water relations for the future to come between Ethiopia and Egypt in particular and all Nile riparian states in general signaling the possible dominance of states in the head of the water systems.
Although Ethiopia constructed and filled the dam without any formal framework of agreement with downstream states such as Egypt, the hydropower rivalry between the two countries was largely settled following Ethiopia’s near completion and filling of the GERD in August 2024 and its inauguration on 9 September 2025. In this process, Ethiopia’s argument that the dam would not diminish the volume of water flowing to downstream countries gained political acceptance among diplomatic communities. Ultimately, Egypt, albeit reluctantly and painfully, acknowledged Ethiopia’s effective control over the Nile. However, the recent weather and environmental developments in the Horn of Africa/HoA will shape the Ethio-Egyptian water relations and put a question over the sustainability of hydropower investments as weather would affect the water volume and energy generations significantly.
The weather and environment intelligence report recently released by a USA based organization called Famine Early Warning Systems Network/FEWS-Net indicated that El Niño, a periodic warming of the ocean surface, related dryness is already emerging in the HoA. According to the report the HoA countries including Ethiopia has experienced a delayed and below-average rainfall season in the months between March to September. Prolonged dry spell is also expected in the months to come. The same report indicated that the Above-Average Temperatures Most Likely into Early 2027 increasing likelihood of extreme warm temperatures, affecting streams and water volumes. The region is expected to register a likely 0.5-3°C temperature rise and it will be hotter than typical level of temperature in the region. This significant rainfall deficits, rising temperature and dry spell is an indicative of drought conditions in the HoA and significantly shaping the Ethio-Egyptian relations and putting a strategic question over the sustainability of hydropower.

The FEWS‑Net report, though primarily directed at humanitarian actors such as World Food Program/WFP to prompt immediate interventions in response to rising temperatures and declining rainfall, the issue extends far beyond humanitarian concerns. It constitutes a fundamental driver of instability and a critical factor shaping future investments and reliance on hydropower. In addition to exacerbating humanitarian crises and inflating food prices, the projections underscore that climate‑induced reductions in water availability could reignite hydropower rivalries between lower and upper Nile riparian states. These climatic conditions are likely to intensify Ethiopia‑Sudan‑Egypt tensions over the Nile, as reflected in recent complaints by Sudan and Egypt regarding water releases from GERD. While the GERD can generate near‑optimal hydropower without causing significant downstream deficits under wet, average, or short‑term drought scenarios, this balance can be disrupted during prolonged dry seasons in Ethiopia and the wider HoA. Egypt, in particular, may seize upon such environmental developments not as temporary misfortunes but as strategic opportunities to reintroduce drought‑contingent operating principles into diplomatic negotiations.
Compounding the ecological pressures in the HoA are the high‑intensity conflicts in Ethiopia’s three northern regions, where the government has alleged that Egypt is playing a critical role and declared persona non grata over one Egyptian diplomat who ordered to leave in 48 hours on October 1, 2026. Therefore, these environmental stresses are likely to reignite regional controversies at a time of heightened tension and looming conflict in Northern Ethiopia, particularly between the Cooperation of Ethiopian People’s Forces for Survival and the federal government. The convergence of ecological strain, political instability and tit-for-tat actions between Ethiopia and Egypt one expelling the diplomat of the other carries significant security implications for Ethiopia and the wider HoA. Egypt, in this context, may exploit the situation to exert diplomatic and coercive pressure on the Ethiopian government, seeking operating agreements over Nile and GERD that include concessions favorable to its interests.
The prevailing environmental trends and ecological pressures in the HoA underscore the urgency of a strategic shift away from over‑reliance on hydropower investments toward a diversified energy portfolio that is less vulnerable to climatic variability. It signal the need to reconsider development pathways that depend heavily on electricity generated from water sources. While hydropower will remain a cornerstone of the global renewable energy transition, its reliability is increasingly undermined by climate change‑induced shifts in hydrological cycles, imparting new dimensions to its strategic significance.
For Ethiopia, this ecological distress raises critical questions about the sustainability of its heavy reliance on hydropower and highlights the necessity of diversifying national energy sources. Pursuing a balanced energy mix strategy, supported by adaptive planning and management, will be essential to ensure hydropower continues to play a pivotal role in the country’s power infrastructure while meeting the rising national demand.
Climate change has triggered significant shifts in hydrological patterns, profoundly affecting the hydropower rivalry between Ethiopia and Egypt and raising broader questions about the reliability of hydropower investments across Africa, particularly in Ethiopia. Diplomatic tensions between the two states over water access and control are increasingly shaped by environmental and climatic dynamics. Concerns are mounting that the previously near‑settled hydropower rivalry will re-surface due to escalating ecological pressures. These developments have the potential to fundamentally alter relations between upper and lower riparian states and heighten the strategic importance of the Nile River. Egypt, framing the Nile as a matter of national security, has repeatedly issued televised warnings that any disruption of water flows would be regarded as an ‘act of war.’ This extension of the Nile discourse from civilian politics to military commitments underscores the gravity of the regional security threat as a result of environmental distress. In light of recent environmental and climatic shifts, Egypt is likely to intensify efforts to re‑internationalize the Nile issue, presenting itself as a vulnerable downstream state while pursuing a diplomatic campaign against Ethiopia. The objective would not necessarily be to compel Ethiopia to relinquish its upstream dominance or release additional water, but rather to impose greater political and reputational constraints on Ethiopia’s exercise of its headwater rights.
In conclusion, extreme weather events are expected to disrupt streamflow and create significant variability in water volumes, leading to substantial reductions in availability. In this context, any future water allocation treaties between Ethiopia and the major downstream states should avoid rigid prescriptions of fixed allocations. Given the region’s environmental vulnerabilities, such agreements must be guided by adaptive strategies that prioritize flexibility and responsiveness to hydrological variability in the headwaters. This approach stands in contrast to colonial‑era frameworks that imposed predictable spheres of utilization while disregarding the impacts of environmental fluctuations. A modern treaty framework should therefore embed adaptive principles, ensuring that water governance reflects ecological realities rather than static allocations.
He is an independent Horn of Africa security analyst and researcher and can be contacted at Ziyinyechale@gmail.com
Ecological Distress in the Horn of Africa: Ethio‑Egyptian Hydropower Relations and the Strategic Significance of Hydropower Investments
International
Akande Presents Credentials to Swedish King, Sets Stage for Stronger Nigeria-Sweden Ties
Akande Presents Credentials to Swedish King, Sets Stage for Stronger Nigeria-Sweden Ties
By: Michael Mike
Nigeria’s Ambassador to Sweden, Lola Akande, has formally assumed her diplomatic responsibilities in the Scandinavian country, presenting her Letters of Credence to King Carl XVI Gustaf at the Royal Palace in Stockholm.
The ceremony, held on Wednesday, marked the formal accreditation of Akande as Nigeria’s representative to the Kingdom of Sweden and opened a new phase in bilateral engagement between the two countries.
Akande was accorded ceremonial honours, including a corps marshal and formal procession, in keeping with Sweden’s diplomatic traditions, before presenting her credentials to the Swedish monarch.

The presentation of Letters of Credence is a key diplomatic procedure through which a receiving state formally recognises an ambassador as the accredited representative of the sending country.
Following the ceremony, a reception was held in Akande’s honour at the Nigerian House in Stockholm, bringing together members of the diplomatic community, government officials, business leaders and Nigerians resident in Sweden.
Those in attendance included ambassadors and members of the African diplomatic corps, officials of the Swedish Ministry for Foreign Affairs, members of the Corps of African Women Ambassadors, Swedish nationals, representatives of the Swedish business community and other invited guests.
The reception provided an opportunity to celebrate the ambassador’s accreditation and highlight the longstanding relationship between Nigeria and Sweden, as well as opportunities to deepen cooperation.
Areas identified for enhanced engagement include trade and investment, innovation, cultural exchange and people-to-people relations.
Akande’s formal accreditation comes as both countries continue to explore avenues for strengthening bilateral ties, with expectations that her tenure will promote closer engagement between Nigerian and Swedish institutions, businesses and communities.
The development also signals renewed diplomatic attention to the Nigerian community in Sweden and the broader prospects for expanding cooperation between Africa’s most populous country and the Nordic nation.
Akande Presents Credentials to Swedish King, Sets Stage for Stronger Nigeria-Sweden Ties
International
NIS enrols 2,296 Nigerians in first week of UK passport intervention
NIS enrols 2,296 Nigerians in first week of UK passport intervention
By: Michael Mike
The Nigeria Immigration Service (NIS) has enrolled 2,296 applicants in the first six operational days of its Special Passport Intervention Exercise in the United Kingdom, with the Manchester Centre recording the higher number of enrolments.
The exercise, which commenced on September 7, 2026, recorded 1,709 applicants at the Manchester Centre and 587 at the London Centre, as Nigerians with confirmed appointments continued to turn out for passport services.
Daily enrolment figures across the two centres stood at 245 on September 7, 401 on September 8, 396 on September 9, 429 on September 10, 406 on September 11 and 419 on September 12.
The Service said the sustained turnout reflected steady progress in the processing of applicants with confirmed appointments, adding that passport production and dispatch for those already enrolled had commenced and were progressing steadily.
As part of efforts to ensure effective oversight and quality service delivery, the Comptroller-General of the NIS, Kemi Nanna Nandap, undertook working visits to the intervention centres in Manchester and London.
The visits, according to the Service, were aimed at assessing the exercise firsthand, engaging with members of the Nigerian community and ensuring that the intervention provided efficient, responsive and seamless passport services to applicants.
The NIS said the exercise would continue at both centres, assuring applicants with confirmed intervention appointments of service.
The Service said it appreciates members of the Nigerian community in the UK for their patience, understanding and cooperation, urging all applicants to continue working with officials on the ground to ensure the smooth and efficient delivery of the intervention.
NIS enrols 2,296 Nigerians in first week of UK passport intervention
-
News3 years agoRoger Federer’s Shock as DNA Results Reveal Myla and Charlene Are Not His Biological Children
-
Opinions5 years agoTHE PLIGHT OF FARIDA
-
News1 year agoFAILED COUP IN BURKINA FASO: HOW TRAORÉ NARROWLY ESCAPED ASSASSINATION PLOT AMID FOREIGN INTERFERENCE CLAIMS
-
News3 years agoEYN: Rev. Billi, Distortion of History, and The Living Tamarind Tree
-
Opinions5 years agoPOLICE CHARGE ROOMS, A MINTING PRESS
-
ACADEMICS3 years agoA History of Biu” (2015) and The Lingering Bura-Pabir Question (1)
-
Columns3 years agoArmy University Biu: There is certain interest, but certainly not from Borno.
-
Politics1 year ago2027: Why Hon. Midala Balami Must Go, as Youths in Hawul and Asikira/Uba Federal Constituency Reject ₦500,000 as Sallah Gift
