News
CCS Supports Objective Security Reporting, Rejects Ethnic Double Standards in Addressing Criminality
PRESS STATEMENT
CCS Supports Objective Security Reporting, Rejects Ethnic Double Standards in Addressing Criminality
July 8, 2026
The Centre for Contemporary Studies (CCS), Abuja, expresses its support for the position articulated by security analyst and conflict reporter Zagazola Makama on the imperative of objective, fact-based reporting of criminal activities, irrespective of the ethnic, religious, or political identity of those involved.
CCS believes that the fight against insecurity in Nigeria can only succeed when the same standards of accountability are applied to all offenders without exception. Criminality does not become acceptable because it is committed by a member of one’s ethnic group, nor does violence become justifiable because it is wrapped in the language of communal defence.
The controversy generated by the identification of a suspected attacker involved in the attempted assault on the National Institute for Policy and Strategic Studies (NIPSS), Kuru, highlights a deeper national challenge: the tendency of some individuals and groups to support transparency only when it exposes those they consider opponents, while resisting the same transparency when facts implicate members of their own communities.
CCS maintains that objective reporting is not ethnic profiling. Where credible facts establish the identity, affiliation, or operational background of criminal actors, journalists and security analysts should not be intimidated into suppressing such information merely because it is politically inconvenient or socially uncomfortable. Selective outrage and selective accountability only deepen mistrust and prolong conflict.
For years, Nigerians have demanded that security reports accurately identify perpetrators of violence. That demand must remain consistent. Whether the perpetrators are Fulani bandits, Berom militias, Irigwe militias, Mwaghavul militias, or any other armed criminal group, the truth must be reported and the law must take its course.
The Centre also commends the professionalism and courage of security personnel who successfully repelled the attempted attack on NIPSS and continue to defend strategic national institutions under difficult circumstances. Their sacrifices deserve public recognition and support.
CCS wishes to emphasize that no community in Nigeria possesses a monopoly on either victimhood or criminality. Across the country, millions of law-abiding citizens from every ethnic and religious background desire peace, security, and justice. Equally, criminal elements exist across communities and must be confronted without bias or sentiment.
Nigeria cannot defeat insecurity if citizens judge crimes based on the identity of the perpetrator rather than the nature of the offence. A criminal remains a criminal regardless of ethnicity. An armed attacker remains an armed attacker regardless of religion. A murderer does not become a hero because he belongs to a particular community.
The Centre therefore calls on the media, civil society organisations, community leaders, and the general public to uphold a single standard of justice and accountability. The protection of criminals through ethnic, religious, or political narratives undermines national security and weakens efforts to build lasting peace.
CCS stands firmly for truth, accountability, and equal justice under the law. We support all responsible efforts to expose criminality wherever it exists and reject every attempt to shield offenders from scrutiny because of their identity.
There must be no sacred cows in the fight against insecurity. There must be no shielding of criminals. Justice must remain blind to ethnicity, religion, and politics.
Yusuf Musa
Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
Centre for Contemporary Studies (CCS), Abuja &
Capt. Kabir Aminu (Rtd.)
Director, Security and Strategic Studies
Centre for Contemporary Studies (CCS), Abuja
CCS Supports Objective Security Reporting, Rejects Ethnic Double Standards in Addressing Criminality
News
Athena Raises Alarm Over ‘Shrinking Democratic Space’ as EFCC Action, Campaign Fees Trigger Electoral Concerns
Athena Raises Alarm Over ‘Shrinking Democratic Space’ as EFCC Action, Campaign Fees Trigger Electoral Concerns
By: Michael Mike
Concerns over Nigeria’s electoral environment have intensified following warnings by the Athena Election Observatory that recent actions by public institutions, though within their legal mandates, could undermine confidence in democratic competition if not guided by stronger safeguards.
The election monitoring body, in a statement on Thursday, cautioned that the exercise of state power during election periods must be balanced with the need to protect political participation, institutional neutrality and public trust.
The warning comes after the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) restricted access to an account belonging to the Osun State Government on Aug. 5, as part of an investigation into alleged diversion of public funds — a move that attracted controversy because it occurred just days before the Aug. 15 Osun governorship election.
The Osun State Government has denied any wrongdoing.
President Bola Tinubu later directed the EFCC to take steps to reverse the restriction, while maintaining that the anti-graft agency remained independent.
Athena described the President’s intervention as a significant corrective action but said the episode exposed a deeper institutional challenge: the need for public agencies to anticipate how the timing and impact of their decisions may affect perceptions of electoral fairness.
The group stressed that anti-corruption investigations must not be suspended because of elections, noting that public resources must remain protected and institutions must continue to perform their statutory duties. However, it argued that actions capable of affecting an election environment require exceptional judgement, transparency and safeguards against unintended political consequences.
According to the Observatory, “legal authority should be accompanied by necessity, proportionality, transparency and safeguards against avoidable electoral disruption.”
The group’s concerns extended beyond the Osun development to controversial campaign advertising fees announced by Abia and Anambra States, which it said could create financial barriers capable of limiting political competition.
In Abia State, campaign advertising permit charges reportedly introduced by the state signage agency require presidential candidates to pay ₦200 million, governorship candidates ₦150 million, senatorial candidates ₦100 million, House of Representatives candidates ₦50 million and State House of Assembly candidates ₦20 million.
Anambra State has also announced advertising permit fees of ₦50 million for presidential candidates, ₦20 million for senatorial candidates, ₦5 million for House of Representatives candidates and ₦1.5 million for State House of Assembly candidates.
The regulations reportedly cover not only traditional outdoor advertisements such as billboards and posters but also branded materials, public address systems, rallies and other campaign-related activities.
Athena argued that while state governments have the authority to regulate public spaces, environmental standards and outdoor advertising, such powers must not become tools for imposing additional hurdles on electoral participation.
The group highlighted the financial implications of the Abia charges, noting that the fees consume a substantial portion of candidates’ legally permitted campaign spending limits under the Electoral Act 2026.
It pointed out that a ₦20 million permit fee for a State House of Assembly candidate represents one-fifth of the ₦100 million statutory expenditure limit for that election, before candidates spend money on campaign materials, logistics, mobilisation and other activities.
The Observatory warned that such requirements could disproportionately affect smaller political parties and less wealthy candidates, potentially strengthening the influence of money in politics rather than reducing it.
“Campaign expenditure limits are intended to restrain the influence of money and promote fair competition,” the group said, arguing that state-imposed political fees that consume a significant portion of those limits work against that objective.
Athena maintained that Nigeria’s democratic framework is built on the principle that elections should be governed by transparent and uniform rules, rather than additional conditions created by administrative authorities.
It called on Abia and Anambra States to withdraw candidate-specific campaign advertising fees and instead apply ordinary advertising regulations that are content-neutral and applicable to all users of public spaces.
The organisation also urged the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to issue national guidance clarifying that state and local regulatory powers cannot be used to introduce new conditions for participation in elections conducted under the Constitution and Electoral Act.
Athena said its position was not based on the interests of any political party, candidate or government involved in the controversies, but on protecting the integrity of Nigeria’s democratic institutions.
“Accountability, regulation and democratic competition should reinforce one another,” the group said. “Administrative power must not shrink democratic space.”
The warning comes as Nigeria approaches a new cycle of major elections, with civil society organisations increasingly urging state institutions to ensure that enforcement actions, regulations and administrative decisions are applied in ways that preserve public confidence in the neutrality of government institutions.
Athena Raises Alarm Over ‘Shrinking Democratic Space’ as EFCC Action, Campaign Fees Trigger Electoral Concerns
News
Berom Militia Killed four Fulani Harders, shots 25 Cattle in Fresh Attack in Plateau’s Riyom
Berom Militia Killed four Fulani Harders, shots 25 Cattle in Fresh Attack in Plateau’s Riyom
By Zagazola Makama
Four herders have been brutally killed and two others injured in a deadly attack by suspected Berom militia in Wereng Community of Riyom Local Government Area of Plateau State.

Intelligence sources told Zagazola Makama that troops of Sector 6 under Operation Enduring Peace responded at about 2:00 p.m. on Aug. 6 following reports of gunshots around Wereng Community.

On arrival, the troops combed the area and discovered the bodies of three herders, while two other victims were found with gunshot wounds and rescued.
The sources said the troops also found that 14 cattle had been killed during the attack, while another 11 cattle sustained gunshot injuries.
Preliminary investigations indicated that the affected herders were from Gwarim Community in Riyom Local Government Area and were allegedly attacked by suspected Berom militia operating from Angwan Wereng Community.

The bodies of the deceased were recovered by the troops, while the injured herders were evacuated to the Jos University Teaching Hospital (JUTH) for medical treatment.
Security sources said troops have intensified efforts to identify and apprehend those responsible for the attack.
They added that security personnel have continued to dominate the area to prevent any reprisal attack and maintain law and order as investigations into the incident continue.
Berom Militia Killed four Fulani Harders, shots 25 Cattle in Fresh Attack in Plateau’s Riyom
News
CP calls on residents to support security agencies in Yobe
CP calls on residents to support security agencies in Yobe
By: Yahaya Wakili
Yobe State Commissioner of Police, CP Usman Kanfani JJibrin, PSC, MSPSP, SM. ICM has called on residents of Yobe State to continue supporting security agencies by providing timely, credible, and actionable information.
He said the prevailing peace and security in the state can only be sustained through mutual trust, collaboration, and coordinated efforts among all security agencies.
CP Usman Kanfani Jibrin revealed this while receiving the newly posted state commandant of the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC), CC Hassan Owuna, at his office.
He maintained that the command’s unwavering commitment to fostering stronger inter-agency collaboration through intelligence-led policing, joint security building, and other coordinated strategies aimed at preventing and combating crime, protecting critical national assets, and ensuring the safety of lives and property across the state.
Earlier, the NSCDC Yobe State Commandant, CC Hassan Owuna, reaffirmed his commitment to strengthening the existing partnership between the police command and the NSCDC in Yobe State.
He emphasised the need for sustained cooperation, intelligence sharing, and operational synergy among security agencies to effectively address emerging security challenges and enhance public safety.
CC Owuna expressed appreciation for the warm reception accorded to him and his members of his management team.
CP calls on residents to support security agencies in Yobe
-
News2 years agoRoger Federer’s Shock as DNA Results Reveal Myla and Charlene Are Not His Biological Children
-
Opinions4 years agoTHE PLIGHT OF FARIDA
-
News1 year agoFAILED COUP IN BURKINA FASO: HOW TRAORÉ NARROWLY ESCAPED ASSASSINATION PLOT AMID FOREIGN INTERFERENCE CLAIMS
-
News2 years agoEYN: Rev. Billi, Distortion of History, and The Living Tamarind Tree
-
Opinions5 years agoPOLICE CHARGE ROOMS, A MINTING PRESS
-
ACADEMICS2 years agoA History of Biu” (2015) and The Lingering Bura-Pabir Question (1)
-
Columns2 years agoArmy University Biu: There is certain interest, but certainly not from Borno.
-
Politics1 year ago2027: Why Hon. Midala Balami Must Go, as Youths in Hawul and Asikira/Uba Federal Constituency Reject ₦500,000 as Sallah Gift
