Connect with us

Feature

Economic reforms: How did President Tinubu uniquely reshape Nigeria’s economy?

Published

on

Economic reforms: How did President Tinubu uniquely reshape Nigeria’s economy?

By: Dr Abolade Agbola

In a few months, the economic reforms of the government of President Tinubu will be three years old, while the government will be on the last lap of its four-year first-term mandate.

The President’s statement at his inauguration on the 29th May 2023, that “the fuel subsidy was gone,” ushered in a series of reforms that reshaped the economy. Two weeks after the President’s inauguration, the Central Bank unified the multiple exchange rates on 14th June 2023 and transitioned from a rigid, multi-layered exchange rate system to a unified, “willing buyer-willing seller” managed float regime.

The Presidential Committee on Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms was constituted in July 2023 to draft a new tax and fiscal law. In March 2024, the Central Bank announced a new threshold for bank capital, requiring banks to increase their minimum share capital by the March 31, 2026, deadline to strengthen the financial system against impending economic shocks following the reforms and support the nation’s economic growth target of $ 1 trillion in GDP by 2030. Nigeria has had several foreign exchange market reforms, but the most profound ones are the transition from the Import licensing scheme to the Second-Tier Foreign Exchange market in 1986, following the deregulation and liberalization of the economy, and the massive devaluation of the currency in 1994. The uniqueness of the 2023 reforms lay in their timing, at the dawn of the administration, and in complementary policies such as the floating of the Naira following the abolition of multiple exchange rates, thus allowing the market to achieve equilibrium simultaneously in the pricing of petrol and the Naira.

The fuel subsidy removal led to a price increase for petrol from N200 per litre in May 2023 to between N1,200 and N1,300 per litre in early 2025. The floating of the Naira and unification of multiple exchange rates led to the currency’s massive devaluation from N460: $1 on 29th May 2023 to N1,700: $1 by November 2024. The post-subsidy removal and Naira floatation in the economy led to high inflation and a decline in household consumption. According to the World Bank, 56% of Nigerians (over 113 million people) living below the poverty line in 2023 are projected to reach 61% (139 million) by 2025.

Today, the Naira is stabilizing at about N1,400: $1, while petrol has fallen to about N880 per litre, and inflation has receded to 15.15%, with prospects of getting to a single digit before the end of 2026. A single-digit inflation rate will take a substantial number of people out of poverty as the mystery index declines alongside the receding inflationary spiral, as policies that foster job creation, reduce price volatility, and stimulate economic growth are implemented.

Nigeria was on the brink of economic collapse in 2023. Most of the sub-nationals were unable to pay salaries. There was no budget for fuel subsidy from 1st June 2023. The external reserves of US$34.39 billion in May 2023 were barely adequate to finance 6.5 months of imports of goods and services and 8.8 months of imports of goods only. JP Morgan, a global financial institution, later claimed that the previous administration actually left Nigeria with a net reserve of $3.7 billion, rather than $34.39 billion. In May 2023, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) had a foreign currency liability to foreign airlines of approximately $2.27 billion due to the airlines’ inability to repatriate their ticket sales revenue. Nigeria’s foreign reserves stood at $45.21 billion as of December 2025. In fact, the country experienced significant trade surpluses, with reports indicating around N6.69 trillion (Exports: N22.81tn, Imports: N16.12tn) as at the third quarter of 2025, driven by rising crude oil and non-oil exports, such as refined petroleum, despite some fluctuations and policy impacts, highlighting economic restructuring towards diversification.

Nigeria’s economic decline, which compelled the latest reforms, began in 2014, when crude prices began plummeting from their peak of $114 per barrel. Nigeria had two recessions in 4-year intervals, the 2016 recession, when the price of crude oil fell to $27 per barrel due to a U.S. shale oil-inspired glut. The other recession in 2020 was a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, when crude oil prices dropped to $17 per barrel amid worldwide lockdowns aimed at containing it. The economy was rebounding in 2022 when the Russia-Ukraine war disrupted the global commodity supply chain and triggered another round of economic crises.

The government was reluctant to depreciate the Naira in response to economic realities, given its populist and leftist inclinations. The consequence was the near collapse of the economy by the time the 2023 elections were held. The government borrowed massively with the intent of spending its way out of the recession. Nigeria’s total public debt was N77 Trillion, or $108 billion, when President Tinubu was sworn in on the 29th May 2023.

The debt profile had risen to N160 trillion ($111 billion) by the end of 2025, a moderate growth given the significant depreciation of the currency and the vast improvement in the country’s fortunes in the past two years.
Nigeria had intermittently grappled with rent, creating multiple exchange rates since 1986, when the corrupt-laden import license scheme gave way to currency auctions using the Dutch auction method. In 1986, amid the crude oil price meltdown, Nigerians rejected the IMF loan after a debate instigated by the military to carry the people along with the options available at the time for addressing the nation’s economic crisis. The objective of the IMF/World Bank-backed policy was to diversify the oil-dependent economy, reduce imports, privatize state firms, devalue the Naira, and foster private-sector growth to combat worsening economic conditions, such as inflation and debt overhang. In 2023, at its zenith, the rent reached N300 for every dollar sold by the central bank, creating artificial advantages in the market and enabling a few to extract wealth without effort.

No wonder President Tinubu remarked while campaigning that if the multiple exchanges remain for one day after he is sworn in as President, it means he is benefiting from the fraud, and added, “God forbid.”

Fuel price regulation started with the Price Control Act of 1977. The fuel subsidy was introduced around 1986, when we designated fuel stations into two categories. The station that sells to commercial vehicles offers subsidized prices, while the one that sells to private vehicles charges market rates. The arrangement collapsed, and the subsidy regime crept in.

Just as in 2023, Nigeria undertook a massive devaluation of the Naira and the removal of petroleum subsidies in 1994 during the era of General Sanni Abacha. The Naira was devalued from N22 to N80 per dollar in 1994, following the near-collapse of the economy after the annulment of the 12th June 1993 elections and a protracted period of low crude oil prices, which reached $16 per barrel in 1994. Almost simultaneously, the government removed some fuel subsidies and established the Petroleum Trust Fund, headed by the late President Muhammadu Buhari as Chairman, to manage projects funded by part of the removed subsidies.

According to CBN data, inflation rose from 57.03% in 1994 to 72.83% in 1995 due to the policy. The inflationary rate declined to 29.26% in 1996, and 8.52% in 1997, and 9.99% in 1998.

The reforms by President Tinubu in 2023, following the floatation of the Naira and the removal of the fuel subsidy, created a similar inflationary spiral. Inflation rate rose from 22.41% in May 2023 to 28.92% in December 2023, marking a 21-year high. The surge in inflation peaked at 34.80% by December 2024. The year-on-year inflation, however, declined to 15.15% by December 2025, indicating improving price stability as we approach the third year of the reforms.

There is no doubt that inflation will recede to single digits before the end of 2026 as the trigger factors (petrol prices and exchange rates) are now determined by market forces.

The reforms of President Tinubu in 2023 were unique in several ways. The courage to embark on both fuel subsidy removal and floatation of the Naira simultaneously at the dawn of the regime amounted to front-loading the expected and inevitable policy pains for gains that will manifest as the administration winds down its first term in office. What is certain after discounting for possible, unpredictable global headwinds such as commodity price volatility, the pandemic, climate change, and supply chain disruptions, to name a few, is that the economy will continue to improve as we approach the election year.

The trend will certainly play a key role in the 2027 elections. Unlike the 1994 subsidy removal and devaluation of the Naira, during which a portion of the fuel subsidy removal benefits was allocated to the Petroleum Trust Fund(PTF), the benefits of the 2023 policy actions were equitably and transparently shared among the three tiers of government, thereby strengthening the fiscal position of the federating units.

The inequitable distribution of PTF projects among the federating units remains a recurring point of criticism of the initiative. Monthly allocations to the 36 states and 774 local councils increased from roughly ₦458.81 billion in May 2023 to over ₦991 billion by June 2025, representing a 116% increase in some periods.

The improved FACC allocation to the states may be one of the reasons for the cordial relationship between most of the state governors and the federal government, as the states were able to execute many projects to fulfill their campaign promises.

Another unique foresight of the government in implementing the 2023 reforms is the recapitalization of banks to strengthen financial institutions, as the Naira weakens amid a spike in inflation. The massive devaluation of the Naira in 1994 led to a wave of bank failures some years later.

According to Central Bank reports, by 1998, 20 distressed banks had had their licenses revoked, with dire consequences for the economy. The 2024 banking recapitalization, ending March 2026, which gave banks a 24-month window to shore up their capital, was a masterstroke to strengthen the financial system, build stronger, more resilient banks to withstand Naira depreciation shocks, and foster sustainable economic growth and development.

The brand-new set of tax and fiscal laws delivered by the Presidential Committee on Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms became operational on the 1st of January 2026.

The law aims to remove all barriers to business growth in Nigeria and further diversify the economy by enhancing its revenue profile, weaning the nation from reliance on crude oil export revenue.

The laws are to enhance revenue collection efficiency, ensure transparent reporting, and promote the effective utilization of tax and other revenues to boost citizens’ tax morale, foster a healthy tax culture, and drive voluntary compliance.

The government, after protracted negotiations with labour unions, reviewed the national minimum wage in July 2024, from ₦30,000 to ₦70,000 per month, to mitigate the impact of inflation, one of the most debilitating unintended consequences of the reforms. The government, in a proactive move, promulgated the National Minimum Wage Amendment Act 2024 to shorten the minimum wage review period from 5 years to 3 years, meaning that the next formal review is due in 2027.

There are several other projects and programmes aimed at repositioning the economy, such as the massive divestment of onshore oil assets in 2024 by International Oil Companies (IOCs) to indigenous Nigerian firms, which has increased crude oil production from 1.1mbarrel per day in 2023 to around 1.44million barrels per day (mbpd) in 2025. The speedy conclusion of the transfer deals and the rework of the assets is crucial to the actualization of the government’s target of daily production of 2.5m barrels per day in 2026 and the turnaround of the economy for another era of sustainable growth and development.

There is also the deployment of 2,000 high-quality tractors with trailers, ploughs, harrows, sprayers, and planters in 2025 as part of the government’s commitment to inject 2000 tractors annually to improve farming efficiency and reverse the poor mechanization of our farms. Nigeria, with a land area of 92m hectares, of which 34m hectares is arable, has less than 50,000 tractors, which is dismally low and significantly responsible for our food insecurity.

In conclusion, there is no doubt that the President and his team have done many things differently, such as the audacious simultaneous removal of the fuel subsidy and the unification of the multiple exchange rates, the floatation of the Naira, new fiscal and tax laws, the recapitalization of banks, and the minimum wage review.

These are comprehensive monetary, fiscal, and structural reforms that are delivering changes, transitioning our country from a restricted, inefficient, or crisis-prone economy to a more open, market-oriented, and competitive one. The pains uploaded upfront at the inception of the regime are giving way to discernible gains and unprecedented reset of the economy for sustainable growth and development. Our nation is poised to enter another era of pervasive economic boom, having emerged from the bust cycle that began in 2014 stronger.

A solid framework for replicating the economic boom of 2005 to 2014 has been laid by adopting market-determined exchange rates and fuel prices, and by ramping up crude oil production. The government must evolve pragmatic trade and investment policies to mitigate some of the unintended consequences of the reforms, such as dwindling household consumption, escalating inequalities, and the percentage of people living below the poverty line, while protecting local industries, attracting foreign investment, boosting job creation, and enhancing the standard of living of the people. Nigeria is no doubt set for another era of sustainable growth and development.

Dr Abolade Agbola, DBA, MSc Ag Econs, FCS, FCIB, Managing Director of Lam Agro Consult Limited and Lam Business Solutions, is a Stockbroker, Banker, and Agribusiness Business Consultant .He writes from Lagos

Economic reforms: How did President Tinubu uniquely reshape Nigeria’s economy?

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Feature

The Satellite That Refused to Stand Still: Why Nigeria’s Space Asset Is Finally Coming Into Its Own

Published

on

The Satellite That Refused to Stand Still: Why Nigeria’s Space Asset Is Finally Coming Into Its Own

By Danjuma Amodu

For more than a decade, Nigeria has occupied a unique but under-celebrated position in Africa’s digital story. Since 2011, the country has operated its own communications satellite—an achievement few nations on the continent can claim. It placed Nigeria in a select league of countries with sovereign space-based communications infrastructure, a strategic asset capable of shaping everything from national security to broadband access. Yet for years, that satellite seemed to orbit in quiet contradiction: full of promise, but only partially woven into the fabric of everyday Nigerian life.

That contradiction is now being challenged.

When Jane Nkechi Egerton-Idehen assumed leadership of Nigerian Communications Satellite Limited in 2023, she stepped into an institution that reflected a broader pattern in Nigeria’s public infrastructure—significant capital investment without corresponding utilisation. The satellite’s broadcasting capacity was underused, its broadband services had lost commercial traction, and the organisation leaned heavily on government patronage. In a country where millions remained unconnected, the gap between capability and impact was glaring.

Her arrival coincided with a policy shift under President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, whose Renewed Hope Agenda placed digital infrastructure at the centre of economic transformation. That alignment of leadership and national policy created a narrow but critical window: the chance to reposition satellite technology not as a technical luxury, but as foundational infrastructure.

To understand the significance of what has followed, it is important to situate Nigeria’s satellite programme within a broader historical and economic context. Nigeria’s space ambitions date back to the early 2000s, driven by a recognition that terrestrial infrastructure alone could not solve the country’s connectivity challenges. Vast rural expanses, difficult terrain, and the high cost of fibre deployment meant that millions would remain excluded unless alternative technologies were deployed. Satellite offered that alternative—capable of reaching the unreached, connecting the disconnected, and doing so at scale.

But infrastructure, by itself, does not guarantee impact. It requires strategy, partnerships, and, crucially, a market.

What has changed in the past two years is not the satellite itself, but how it is being positioned. Under Egerton-Idehen’s leadership, NIGCOMSAT has shifted from a largely government-facing agency to a more commercially aware and partnership-driven enterprise. The expansion of television channels on its platform—from 45 to 150—and the growth of its audience from 2 million to 7 million Nigerians are not just statistics; they represent a deliberate effort to maximise existing capacity and prove relevance in a competitive media landscape.

Equally important is the organisation’s role in Nigeria’s Digital Switch Over, executed in partnership with the National Broadcasting Commission. For years, the transition from analogue to digital broadcasting has been slow and uneven. Satellite infrastructure, with its wide coverage and reliability, provides the backbone needed to accelerate that transition. In this sense, NIGCOMSAT is not merely a participant but an enabler of a long-delayed national reform.

Perhaps the most consequential shift, however, lies in connectivity. Nigeria’s digital divide is not just a technological issue; it is an economic and social fault line. Urban centres continue to attract investment in fibre and mobile networks, while rural communities remain underserved because the business case for traditional infrastructure is weak. By partnering with companies such as MTN Nigeria and IHS Towers, NIGCOMSAT is positioning satellite as a complementary layer—extending coverage to places where cables cannot easily go.

This has real-world implications. It means a rural clinic can access telemedicine services. It means a school in a remote community can connect to digital learning platforms. It means security agencies, including the Nigerian Navy, can maintain communication in environments where terrestrial networks fail. These are not abstract gains; they are practical interventions in some of Nigeria’s most persistent development challenges.

The introduction of the NIGCOMSAT Accelerator Programme in 2024 adds another dimension to this transformation. Historically, space infrastructure in many countries has been treated as a closed system—owned and operated by government, with limited avenues for private sector innovation. By opening access to startups, NIGCOMSAT is effectively democratising its infrastructure, allowing entrepreneurs to build solutions on top of it.

The significance of this cannot be overstated. More than 80 startups have already passed through the programme, developing applications that range from security-focused drone systems to healthcare connectivity platforms. The example of rural hospitals being linked through VSAT technology illustrates a broader point: when infrastructure becomes accessible, innovation follows. By training over 500 young Nigerians—many of them women—the programme is also investing in human capital, ensuring that the country is not just a consumer of technology, but a creator.

At the policy level, voices like Bosun Tijani have reinforced the strategic importance of satellite technology. His assertion that satellite systems sit at the centre of global digital transformation reflects a growing consensus: connectivity is no longer optional; it is foundational. In this context, Nigeria’s status as the only West African country with its own communications satellite is not just a point of pride—it is a strategic advantage that must be fully leveraged.

That advantage is set to deepen with the planned launch of NigComSat-2A and NigComSat-2B, approved by the federal government and scheduled for 2028 and 2029. These satellites will expand capacity, improve redundancy, and position Nigeria to meet growing demand for broadband and digital services. More importantly, they signal continuity—a recognition that space infrastructure is not a one-off investment, but a long-term commitment.

Yet, even as progress is evident, it would be premature to declare victory. Challenges remain. The sustainability of commercial gains, competition from global satellite providers, regulatory bottlenecks, and the broader economic environment will all shape the trajectory of NIGCOMSAT’s transformation. The real test will be whether these early gains can be consolidated into a durable, self-sustaining model that continues to deliver value beyond government support.

Still, there is a clear shift underway. For years, Nigeria’s satellite story was one of quiet existence—present, functional, but largely peripheral to the national conversation. Today, it is becoming central to discussions about connectivity, innovation, and economic inclusion.

Egerton-Idehen captured this vision succinctly when she framed investment in space as an investment in education, healthcare, security, and commerce. That framing matters because it reframes the narrative: from space as a distant, technical domain to space as a practical tool for development.

In the end, the story of Nigeria’s satellite is not just about technology. It is about utilisation, leadership, and the ability to translate infrastructure into impact. After years of circling with untapped potential, the satellite that once seemed content to stand still is now moving—steadily, deliberately—into the centre of Nigeria’s development agenda.

Danjuma Amodu is a journalist and public analyst based in Abuja. He writes on governance, digital infrastructure, and public policy.

The Satellite That Refused to Stand Still: Why Nigeria’s Space Asset Is Finally Coming Into Its Own

Continue Reading

Feature

Amupiutated – In Touch, The Nation newspaper

Published

on

Amupiutated – In Touch, The Nation newspaper

By Sam Omatseye

The man in the nightmare of Atiku, Mark, Aregbesola and company must be one Nafiu Gombe. He was a sore thumb on creation day. That is, when the rains started to beat the coalition. He did not resign. No one has asked what the fellows in the Ralph Nwosu-led executive took from the army of occupation that Gombe did not get. They did not drop out for nothing. ADC was not formed for charity. It was no virgin asking for a rapist. The coalition of the wounded gave something. We want to know why and what.

We should also know why Gombe has not flinched. Did he get the offer and look the other way? Was he not ready to succumb for the cheap. What was the scale and character of the settlement?

Many media folks and reporters love the ADC folks too much to expose them? Maybe the few reporters and editors who want the truth ought to dig and soil their shovels. In Warri, in my boyhood years, we delighted in the phrase, “cheap article dey run belle.” It simply means, if you prefer to buy infested piece of food because it is cheap, a running stomach awaits you. ADC is in the belly of storm.

The ADC folks did not want to do the work of forming a political party. They settled for the aje butter formula. They want what is easy instead of what is true. They did not want to sweat, wait, get bruised, stumble and follow the narrow path. When they tried, they formed ADA. It sounded like a sister’s name. Then they learned it was a copycat. They did not know how to even name a party. So, they wanted a soup already cooked. Now they are having running stomach and they are blaming someone else who spent all day in the kitchen deploying heat and ingredients. What ADC has done is what Eleyinmi in Village Headmaster will call “nonsense and ingredients.”

Let us have some language lesson with the word ante bellum. It is latin, and we know lawyers have afflicted themselves with that ancient language. So, we can start with ante, and it means ‘before,’ ‘in front of’ or ‘prior to.’ Bellum means war or warfare. INEC chair Prof. Joash Amupitan has cleared the fog in his interview with Arise TV anchor Reuben Abati.

The folks in the ADC and their television lawyers are alien to this fact. When the Court of Appeal says the factions should revert to the status quo ante bellum, it means before the war in the ADC. So, when did the war in the ADC begin? Was it not when David Mark and his disciples browbeat the party executive to stand down? They did not resign a bloc. There is no constitutional recognition of group abdication. They did as individuals. Their trouble is with Gomb, who says it is his emilokan moment to be the party chairman.

ADC says he resigned. He said he did not. ADC is circulating what looks like a letter. It reads like a form. Did the ADC produce a stock letter for resignation whereby a person fills his name like a form? Everyone resigns for different reasons. But the letter in circulation looks like one written as though everyone must sign with the same reason and the same language. Even the handwriting in the same so-called letter is not consistent with a conflict of cursive and straight penmanship. Again, the letter was sent to INEC about four months after his purported resignation. Mariama Ba wrote a work titled: So Long a Letter. For ADC, so long a letter travels. We want to know if the ADC has the audacity to tender a forged letter in court; if, that is, Gombe’s denial is right. It will be defending a crime with a crime. It is also called double jeopardy. Fela would call it deady body get accident… Deady body break bone..Na double wahala for deady body and the owner of deady body.

The subplot of this drama is a battle of memory. Are they trying to play with the remembrance of things past, apologies to Marcel Proust. It is not like Proust which happened a long time ago. This is just months. Or is it like when Shakespeare says that they are making “a sinner of memory to credit a lie.”?

So, ante bellum means before that moment when the hostilities fomented, and it means before Mark was installed. Gombe never accepted Mark, and he believes he (Gombe)is the authentic chairman. That makes, in his lights, Mark a usurper.

Because the ADC folks are no respecters of the law, they have vowed to conduct their conventions and congresses, even though the court warned against any act on both sides. It means the folks are not serious. One Chidi Odinkalu said the professor – and Chidi is nowhere near a professor – who is INEC chair should not interpret the court verdict. A hollow man indeed he is. He wants Amupitan to go seek legal clarification in court. I know Chidi and his folks cannot write a manifesto yet, but who stops him and his ADC from going to court to seek same?

They cannot form a party. They cannot take over a party. They cannot settle everyone. They cannot interpret a court decision. They cannot write a manifesto as yet. They cannot obey court order. They are busy playing a club of political retirees without knowing it. They even have representatives abroad. Maybe they should ask for that task one of their stars, Rabiu Kwakwanso, who has been barred for terror reasons from the United States. He, too, should go to the Hague. Chidi should be his attorney for top dollar. ADC can pay.

They see themselves in ADC as a kaleidoscope of our politics. ADC glitters but no gold. Real gold takes a lot of digging. They should ask the president how he did his work. Some of the ADC men like Rauf know it.

Tinubu started his work years ago, and his political career in this republic began with the Alliance for Democracy. He did not found it but he ran from its grassroots to be governor. Just like his tour as president, he started with crisis. He did not cry. Rather he tackled the foes. One group was the elders of the Afenifere who wanted to lord it over him. They wanted to make him a marionette. They tried to impose Ganiyu Dawodu, who almost purloined his victory for Funsho Williams. He did not cry but worked within the party to get it back. They wanted to control Tinubu, his policies, his appointees. He defeated them. The trojan Babatunde Raji Fashola (SAN), who was Tinubu’s chief of staff tells for my upcoming book an incident when he banged the table in his office about not ceding an inch to them. The other battle was with Obasanjo, who planted spies and worms in the AD, wanted to weaken the party for the 2007 polls, a story told with Pathos by Olawale Oshun in his book The Kiss of Death. Tinubu did not cry like ADC about OBJ trying to kill his party. Neither did he compromise. He manoeuvred and blindsided and ambushed the general by forming the Action Congress. The stealth and imagination that led to the formation of AC reads like the story of witchcraft. But the details must not be unveiled here until my book tells it blow by blow. It was a political thriller. Even OBJ cannot tell it in public to save his ego. And some of those who took part in the scheme did not know who was pulling the strings and why. In an interview with one of them, he confessed, “But I was not aware.”

Yet, in the 2003 elections, when other states fell in the Southwest to the OBJ shenanigans, Lagos State was left unscathed. How did Tinubu ride the Tiger to his destination and the tiger was thankful and only growled away. Both beast and rider waved goodbye. He was going to beat the tiger later and reinforce the image of the last man standing.

Even if OBJ did sweep the Southwest states for his men, the same Tinubu did not weep. He went to work and the states, Edo, Oyo, Ogun, Osun, Ekiti, Ondo, all became progressives. In a famous Fashola line, they came back “one by one by God.”

After that, Tinubu pitched for the centre. No one can doubt that he was the architect and spirit behind the fall of PDP with Jonathan’s ouster. In one sweep, he redeemed Buhari and ended what was dreamed as a dynasty for 60 years.

Emilokan and Olule came as a war cry from Abeokuta. He beat his party leaders. Not strange to him. He did that in Lagos with Afenifere. He had said in Yoruba that they who wanted to scuttle his ambition with fuel and currency scarcity did not know the way home. The rest is history.

The ADC folks are crying because Amupitan obeyed the law. They were Amupiutated and they are crying. No legs to kick and hands to blow. The Supreme Court has not ruled, yet they are taking the laws into their hands. They plan to scare us by catastrophising the situation. They are imagining hell because they have no power to fight. They boasted over FCT polls that it would be bellwether of their popularity. How hard they fell.

As the cliché goes, you cannot make an omelette without breaking an egg. They want it served hot. It invokes Herman Melville’s classic novel Moby Dick where an ambitious amputee captain goes to sea to avenge of a white whale.

Amupiutated – In Touch, The Nation newspaper

Continue Reading

Feature

General Chris Musa, Hi-tech Fencing of Nigerian Porous Borders and the Foolish Pride of Sowore

Published

on

General Chris Musa, Hi-tech Fencing of Nigerian Porous Borders and the Foolish Pride of Sowore

By: Bodunrin Kayode

This is like a distraction to my daily routine in Maiduguri but there was no way my binoculars could miss the recent unnecessary rant of Yele Sowore who dared to demonize one of the warriors of the “hadin kai” theatre General Chris Musa by calling him a “foolish” man simply because he rightly suggested that we need a fence to protect residents from our known and unknown enemies. A high tech fence that can even compete with what the Israelis have against their known enemies. I told myself I had to leave whatever I was doing to defend the General and the Borno people. And to correct the ignorant impression he has painted with such misplaced comments.

Reading such despicable bile coming from someone who is not in touch with the trauma of Borno residents and has never visited even the capital city of Maiduguri spells volume about a man who wants to be the Commander in Chief of the armed forces yet so ignorant about Nigeria. He sounded so daft in his presentation that one begins to wonder if indeed he was educated as he claims to be. He actually spoke as if he was paid to do so because nothing happens in the vacuum in Nigeria these days.

You are very wrong Yele

Let me educate him on why this fence will help our war Commanders in the operation Hadin Kai especially if the contract would be given to military engineers who will build with one hand and handle weapons for protecting themselves with the other hand. This is because no civilian contractor will be safe enough to take such a big risk meant to stop insurgents to cross cross as they will.

Borno is the only State sharing massive borders with three African countries. Chad, Niger and Cameroon. That places the State in a very critical situation when it comes to the management of intelligence and warding off the criminals related to the 16 year old lingering insurgency war. It puts our Intel agencies at a vulnerable defensive state rather than proactive position of strength to help the military.

And indeed, like several other countries have done to protect their people, hi-tech fences were built with sentry towers to ward off external aggressors. In our case, those enemies of state who will get to terrorist cells in Libya, Mauritania and even the Magreb region to train and return with standby mercenaries to kill, steal and destroy the existence of our people. They have been doing it since 2009 and will not stop till General Chris Musa succeeds in positioning a memo that will sail through the national executive council for the first phase of the fence building spree to commence.

I watched Sowore vomit so much gibberish recently about General Chris Musa that i wonder if he knows that he can never rival the pedigree of the Minister of defence. He should equally know that he is just a confused brat in terms of pedigree compared to the towering image General Musa has built for himself. Sowore therefore is not qualified to de-market the Minister for any reason at all under the sun. He is rather the “foolish” one using his language, that needs to apologize to Gen Musa for talking out of point. How much will it cost to build the Israeli type of fence even if we must get it from the stolen commonwealth EFCC and ICPC are recouping daily for government?

Yele’s lack of focus and failed Presidential ambitions

Sometimes I wonder if we as Africans don’t believe in reverencing our role models rather than spending time firing arrows of the Pull Him Down syndrome (PHD) against them out of foolish pride and envy. That Yele contested for the position of President on the platform of an obscure party does not mean he is qualified to hold the political position of councillor even in his state Ondo. He should go start at the level of councillor to see how acceptable he is before daring to want to be our Commander in Chief which he will never get.

He even had the audacity to call General Musa “foolish man”. I don’t blame him, its because talk is always free in Nigeria. If not, that people like him give unnecessary importance to themselves even without electoral value who would have known him even as an ordinary ilaje boy. How on earth do you demonize a man who is fighting to save his country from eminent collapse so we do not have a repeat of what happened in Afghanistan here. A situation where after a long generational fight of asymmetric warfare, the Americans had to leave the county for their very enemies, the Taliban to take over the reigns of government.
I used to think Omoyele had some grits around his persona but it is obvious he is just a confused empty barrel fit for the noise he makes around himself.

Sowore who has never held a political position in his life should know that right thinking people in Nigeria do not take him serious because of the lack of focus in his pattern of activism. I wonder why anyone would think building a fence like other countries faced with terrorism is a stupid idea when he has not come to Borno for an informed survey on the matter. Sowore has really touched the raw nerve of Borno people by de-marketing an actionable idea which most of the informed residents here think will make sense. How foolish he looks now!

Yes Borno needs a hi-tech fence with all the sophistication of technology we can get

You really need to be in Borno state to understand why President Tinubu must build a fence to restrict infiltration of criminals into the country. For as long as there is a sahelian insurgency going on in Mali and Libya, we really need to build that fence as quickly as possible. Mali alone has a coalition of two groups liked to ISis and Al-qaeda while Libya is equally polluted because they have a massive power vacuum created after the death of Gaddafi. From Mali, fighters are passed through Niger into our territory.
For the information of Yele, Saudi Arabia built a fence to stop Iran long time ago from having incursions into their territory and today they can sleep with their two eyes closed. The Saudi Kingdom started the 900km fence against terrorists from Iran in 2014 and are trying to fence the entire country against extremists bent on bringing them to their knees. Pakistan equally has a 2,600 km fence with Afghanistan to prevent smuggling and religious extremism caused by incursions. Many countries with similar challenges are thinking about it so why should Nigeria be different? At least 40 countries have constructed security fences around their borders to avoid extremists infiltrating into their communities since 9/11. America isn’t exempted either.

So what is Sowore talking about? As far as I am concerned , he does not live in Borno and is not qualified to know what is biting the residents on ground. Someone should tell Sowore to stop that foolish rant he started against a solid professional like Minister Musa because it is an unsellable and unwinnable campaign. The proposed fence will generate over 5000 jobs and we in Borno are waiting for it.

Bodunrin Kayode writes in from Maiduguri

General Chris Musa, Hi-tech Fencing of Nigerian Porous Borders and the Foolish Pride of Sowore

Continue Reading

Trending

Verified by MonsterInsights