Unimaid joins nationwide ASUU warning strike

By: Bodunrin Kayode

University of Maiduguri has joined the warning strike called by the National Executive Council (NEC) of ASUU to press home series of demands linked to backlog of unsolved issues with the federal government of Nigeria.

Some of these issues linked to the development and peaceful existence of their members on campus include the foot dragging of the federal government over their legitimate dues like the three months salary arrears which the government is still holding on to.

A memo signed by the new chairman Mohammed Waziri and secretary Dr. Peter Teru stated that the warning strike would be total through out its two weeks duration as it would be well monitored for compliance.

In a release, made available to news men in maiduguri, he went on: “This is to notify all academic staff that the UNIMAID Branch of ASUU, in unwavering compliance with the directive of the National Executive Council (NEC) dated 13th October 2025 and in line with the resolutions adopted at the Branch Congress held on Wednesday, 15th October 2025, hereby calls on all members to adhere strictly to the total and comprehensive warning strike as directed by NEC, effective from 13th October 2025.

“Accordingly, all academic activities are hereby suspended. These include, but are not limited to: Lectures, examinations, Supervision of undergraduate and postgraduate projects/dissertation or thesis Accreditation exercises Statutory and ad-hoc Meetings inaugural and public lectures etc.

“We urge all members to remain resolute, vigilant, and uncompromising in the pursuit of our collective demands. Let no member engage in any action that may undermine the integrity of this struggle. The University Management has been duly notified of our position.

“This action is a principled stand in defense of our rights, the sanctity of collective bargaining, and the revitalization of the Nigerian University System.

” It is a call for improved conditions of service, adequate funding, and respect for agreements freely entered into. An injury to one is an injury to all. United we bargain, divided we beg! Solidarity forever!! ” said the release.

Unimaid joins nationwide ASUU warning strike

NGO empower women farmers in Adamawa to strengthen food security

Nuru Nigeria a Non Governmental Organisation (NGO) has sensitized and supported no fewer than 7,500 women farmers in Adamawa State as part of national efforts to enhance food security.

The initiative, organised in collaboration with financial institutions, policymakers, and other partners, in commemoration of 2025 International Day of Rural Women.

Mrs Amy Gaman, Managing Director, Nuru Nigeria, said, the purpose of the celebration was to encourage and empower women farmers, especially those who are vulnerable in rural communities.

She explained that participants were selected from various local government areas and educated on how to access agricultural loans and financial services to improve their productivity.

She said in line with this year’s World Food Day theme “Hand in Hand for Better Foods and a Better Future” a lot would be achieved in creating an inclusive and sustainable national food system.

Gaman added that stakeholders from different sectors came together to engage in dialogue on how to protect the food system and ensure rural communities are not left behind.

According to her, the Organisation has reached over 40,000 people through its women’s empowerment initiatives in the local government areas where it operates.

In his remarks, Professor David Jato, Adamawa Commissioner for Agriculture commended the Fintiri administration for creating an enabling environment for agricultural development.

According to him, several policies have been implemented by the state government to support rural farmers, especially women, and praised organizations like Nuru Nigeria for complementing government efforts.

Martha Igu, who spoke on behalf of the participants shared testimonials about how Nuru Nigeria has improved their farming practices.

She said their intervention has positively impacted their lives through access to resources, training, and financial support among others.

NGO empower women farmers in Adamawa to strengthen food security

Harassment of Muslim Women in Maiduguri Hospitals: An Assertion Amidst an Alarming Increase in Terrorist Activities in Nigeria’s Northeastern Region. 

By: Dr. James Bwala

The recent allegations made by the Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC), led by its director, Professor Ishaq Akintola, claim that security checks imposed on Muslim women trying to access certain hospitals in Maiduguri constitute harassment. This assertion comes amidst an alarming increase in terrorist activities in Nigeria’s northeastern region, particularly in Maiduguri, which has seen a resurgence in violence and attacks. 

While the intention behind these security measures is ostensibly to protect patients and healthcare providers from potential threats, the implications of these allegations deserve critical analysis. Indeed, the tensions between security measures meant to safeguard communities and the potential for such measures to be perceived as discrimination or harassment may have revealed that MURIC’s claims are inadvertently an attempt to create vulnerabilities within the healthcare sector, particularly during a time when accessibility to medical facilities is crucial.

While I take a critical review of the statement by MURIC, I feel it is necessary to understand the broader context of security in Maiduguri. The city has been at the forefront of a prolonged conflict instigated by Boko Haram and other militant groups. The threat posed by these organizations has resulted in severe security protocols across various public domains, including hospitals. Security checks are designed to mitigate the risks associated with terrorist infiltration, ensuring that individuals entering sensitive areas, such as medical facilities, do not pose a security threat. However, these measures often require a delicate balance between maintaining safety and respecting the rights of individuals, particularly marginalized groups such as women and religious minorities.

MURIC’s allegations highlight the perception of bias against Muslim women who may feel unfairly targeted by security checks resembling racial or religious profiling. The notion that specific demographic features can lead to increased scrutiny and inconvenience raises ethical questions about fairness and equity within security protocols. Security personnel must be trained to conduct their duties without prejudice, ensuring that all individuals receive equitable treatment irrespective of their ethnicity, religion, or gender. Any failure to uphold these standards can exacerbate existing tensions and engender a sense of mistrust between the community and authorities.

In critiquing MURIC’s stance, it is essential to recognize the potential implications of their claims. While the organization seeks to advocate for the rights of Muslim women, their allegations could unintentionally offer cover for those with malicious intentions. If terrorists identified a chink in the security apparatus due to the controversial claims put forth by MURIC, they could exploit this situation to gain easier access to hospitals—or worse, perpetrate attacks there. The current security climate necessitates vigilance and strict adherence to procedures designed to thwart terrorist operations. Thus, the line between legitimate protest against perceived discrimination and enabling dangerous entities must be navigated with caution.

READ ALSO: https://newsng.ng/troops-neutralise-four-iswap-terrorists-rescue-two-hostages-in-gajiram/

Moreover, it is worthwhile to consider what constitutes harassment. For many, harassment alludes to actions that create an intimidating, hostile, or offensive environment. While security checks undoubtedly add a layer of inconvenience, especially for vulnerable groups such as women, they are enacted with the aim of preserving human life and preventing violence. It becomes vital to distinguish between legitimate security practices and systemic discrimination. It is also important to question whether MURIC’s framing of the situation is unproductive, potentially creating further divisions and conflicts within the community, rather than fostering dialogues aimed at constructive solutions.

In examining the responses of relevant stakeholders, state governments, and health authorities in the region, it is important to emphasize the need for comprehensive dialogue. Stakeholders must engage in discussions with community representatives, including organizations like MURIC, to explore the nuances surrounding security measures without dismissing legitimate concerns raised by citizens. Targeted conversations can pave the way for improved protocols that guarantee safety while minimizing the risk of perceived profiling and harassment.

Communication strategies play a significant role in alleviating tensions; thus, hospitals should transparently communicate the reasoning behind security protocols to educate the public. An effort should be made to explain the necessity of thorough checks and how these measures significantly contribute to a safer environment for everyone, regardless of background. Open dialogues can cultivate an atmosphere of trust and cooperation among residents, enhancing their participation in security efforts while addressing concerns voiced by organizations like MURIC.

READ ALSO:https://newsng.ng/why-governor-zulum-directs-immediate-investigation-into-murics-claims-of-hijab-harassment-in-maiduguri-hospitals/

Another critical factor in this critique revolves around the role of media in shaping perceptions of security and community relations. The media portrayal of MURIC’s allegations may amplify feelings of alienation and enmity within an already vulnerable population. A nuanced reporting strategy is essential to avoid sensationalism that either downplays serious security concerns or escalates tensions unnecessarily.

On a deep look at the situation, it is essential to propose recommendations for improving the current situation. First and foremost, any security checks implemented within healthcare facilities must prioritize sensitivity training for security personnel. By emphasizing respect and understanding of cultural practices, personnel can uphold public safety without compromising dignity. Additionally, establishing feedback mechanisms can allow individuals to report grievances related to their experiences during security checks, paving the way for continuous improvement.

Secondly, the collaboration between government bodies, law enforcement, and community organizations should be fortified to address collective security challenges. Joint initiatives such as community workshops focused on building understanding around security measures can aid in forging stronger community bonds.

While the allegations made by MURIC about the harassment of Muslim women during security checks must not be dismissed, they serve as a reminder of the delicate interplay between security and civil liberties. During a time of heightened risks from terrorism in Maiduguri, it is crucial to maintain vigilance and prioritize safety without compromising the rights and dignity of individuals. The focus should be on collaborative efforts that enhance security while fostering inclusivity and understanding. Only through meaningful dialogue can communities navigate the complexities of safeguarding lives and upholding the tenets of justice, equity, and respect.

* James Bwala, PhD, a security strategy analyst, writes from Abuja.

Harassment of Muslim Women in Maiduguri Hospitals: An Assertion Amidst an Alarming Increase in Terrorist Activities in Nigeria’s Northeastern Region.