Connect with us

International

Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan political farce, and a dangerous, malicious provocation – Ma Zhaoxi, China Vice Foreign Minister

Published

on

Nancy Pelosi's visit to Taiwan political farce, and a dangerous, malicious provocation - Ma Zhaoxi, China Vice Foreign Minister

Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan political farce, and a dangerous, malicious provocation – Ma Zhaoxi, China Vice Foreign Minister

On 9 August 2022, Vice Foreign Minister Ma Zhaoxu took questions from China Central Television and China Global Television Network on Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan. Michael Mike monitored the interview for NEWSng and sends excerpt: 

Q1. Over the past few days, US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan has caused strong public outrage in China. What’s your take on this?

Ma: This is just a political farce, and a dangerous, malicious provocation. Speaker Pelosi made this provocative visit in disregard of China’s warning. The visit infringed on China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity; violated the one-China principle and provisions in the three China-US joint communiqués; affected the political foundation of China-US relations; and undermined peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait. It is unacceptable to the Chinese people. China has every reason to respond with countermeasures. The incident is also a lesson, revealing to the world US motives to contain China with Taiwan and the intention of the Taiwan authorities to seek American support for independence. In its aftermath, the one-China consensus of the international community emerged stronger, and the US attempt to play the “Taiwan card” and contain China proved more unpopular and futile.

Q2. The US claims that there is no change to its one-China policy and that Pelosi’s visit does not violate the one-China policy. How would you respond to that?

Ma: The one-China principle is the consensus of the international community. It is also the political foundation on which China develops relations with other countries. It is a red line that must not be crossed. What does one China mean? There can only be one answer. That is, there is but one China in the world, Taiwan is part of China, and the Government of the People’s Republic of China is the sole legal government representing the whole of China. This is a basic norm of international relations confirmed by UNGA Resolution 2758. It is a commitment made by the US in the three China-US joint communiqués. The principle, written down in black and white, is crystal clear. There is no room for ambiguity or arbitrary interpretation.

The US claims that there is no change in its one-China policy. But in fact, it has been undermining the one-China principle over the years. It has put into its one-China policy some unilateral stuff, including the “Taiwan Relations Act” and the “Six Assurances”. This is against international law. China never accepts it, and is always opposed to it.

The US also claims that Pelosi’s visit does not violate the one-China policy. The three joint communiqués provide that the US can only maintain cultural, commercial and other unofficial relations with Taiwan. The executive, legislative and judicial branches are all part of the US Government. Pelosi is the number three figure in the US Government. During her stay in Taiwan, she was speaking on behalf of the US from the beginning to the end. Even she herself admits that it is an official visit. If this is not official engagement, then what is it?

Q3. The US claims that the change to the status quo that’s prevailed with regard to Taiwan for more than 40 years is coming from Beijing, not from the US. What is your view on this?

Ma: So what is the status quo of the Taiwan Strait? The status quo is that both sides of the Strait belong to one and the same China, Taiwan is part of China, and neither China’s sovereignty nor its territorial integrity is ever divided. It is not China who is changing the status quo, but the US and the “Taiwan independence” separatist forces. 

Over the years, the US has been colluding with the Taiwan authorities, and elevating its substantive relations with Taiwan. It has sold large amounts of weapons to Taiwan, helped it develop so-called “asymmetric capabilities”, and emboldened the “Taiwan independence” separatist forces. If these are not changing the status quo, what are they?

Refusing to recognize the 1992 Consensus, the DPP authorities have insisted on pushing for “incremental independence”, and redoubled efforts to remove the Chinese identity of Taiwan. If these are not changing the status quo, what are they? 

China’s countermeasures are a necessary and legitimate response to the provocations by the US and the “Taiwan independence” forces. They are just and lawful.

Q4. The US says it will not seek and does not want a crisis, and China should take full responsibility for the current escalation of tensions in the Taiwan Strait. What is your take on this?

Ma: This is confounding black and white. The crisis is unilaterally provoked by the US. Despite China’s many representations, the US still allowed Pelosi to visit Taiwan. Faced with this, China has no choice but to fight back and defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity. The responsibility and consequence of the current tensions have to be borne by the US and the “Taiwan independence” separatist forces.

Q5. The US claims that China’s military exercise and crossing of the median line of the Taiwan Strait are overreaction that has escalated the situation and threatened regional peace and stability. What is your take?

Ma: It is the US that is threatening peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait. Taiwan is part of China’s territory. There is no such thing as a median line in the Strait. The Chinese armed forces conduct military exercises in waters off China’s Taiwan island to safeguard sovereignty and territorial integrity of China. Our measures are open and proportionate. They are in line with both domestic law and international law and practices. They are beyond reproach.

Also Read: 2023: When BIU turns to Tinubu, Kashim Shettima and the SWAGA dance in Lagos

The US and its allies often come to the adjacent waters of China, flexing muscles and stirring up troubles. They conduct up to a hundred military exercises each year. They, instead of someone else, are the ones that overreact and escalate the situation.

Q6. The US claims that China’s decision to suspend cooperation with the US in multiple areas does not punish Washington but the whole world. What is you comment?

Ma: The US cannot represent the whole world. China has warned the US well in advance that should Pelosi visit Taiwan, it would cause a crisis and major disruptions to China-US exchange and cooperation. Unfortunately, the US side ignored that, and went ahead with the visit. The Taiwan question is at the very heart of China’s core interests. The United States, while undermining China’s core interests, is asking for China’s cooperation where they need it. What kind of logic is this? China’s decision to cancel or suspend cooperation in some areas does not come without warning. We say what we mean and mean what we say. There is no reason why the US should feel surprised or upset.

Let me stress this: as a responsible major country, China will, as always, take an active part in international cooperation on climate change and other matters. We make our own contribution to the tackling of global challenges. What the US should do is to fulfill its international responsibilities and obligations. It should stop making excuses for its own mistakes. 

Q7. Some in the US compare China’s military drills in the Taiwan Strait to Russia’s “invasion of Ukraine”, which they claim will be denounced by the international community. What is your comment on that?

Ma: Such a claim is ill-intentioned. The Taiwan question is entirely China’s internal affair. It is different from the Ukraine issue. The US always stokes tension and provokes troubles. Preliminary numbers show that between the end of the Second World War and 2001, there were 248 armed conflicts in 153 regions across the world, among which 201 were initiated by the US. Since 2001, wars and military operations launched by the US have resulted in over 800,000 deaths and tens of millions displaced from home. After starting so many wars and killing so many civilians to preserve its hegemony, the US is now creating troubles in the Taiwan Strait. How could we possibly allow this to happen?

Q8. A few days ago, the G7 foreign ministers issued a statement regarding Taiwan with negative language, expressing so-called “concern” over China’s actions. Meanwhile we see an increasing number of countries and international organizations speaking out in support of China’s justified measures. What is your take?

Ma: More than 170 countries and many international organizations have spoken up for what is right, reaffirming their commitment to the one-China principle and expressing support for China in defending its sovereignty and territorial integrity. Both the President of the UN General Assembly and the UN Secretary-General have stated that the UN will continue to adhere to UNGA Resolution 2758, the centerpiece of which is the one-China principle. Compared with over 170 countries, what do G7 think they are? Who cares what they say?

Q9. The US claims that if China continues to take more countermeasures, the US will be forced to respond, which may lead to a spiral of escalation. What is your view on what may happen next?

Ma: It has been proved time and again that the US is the biggest troublemaker of cross-Strait peace and regional stability. If the international community allows the US to do what it wants, the UN Charter will be just a sheet of paper, and the law of the jungle will prevail. In the end, it will be the developing countries that suffer.

The Chinese people are not to be misled by fallacies or scared by evils, and will never waver in defending our core interests. We want to stress to the US: do not act recklessly, and stop going further down on the doomed path. Give up the attempt to use Taiwan to contain China, play no games but return to the one-China principle and the three joint communiqués, and do right things and take concrete steps to facilitate the steady development of China-US relations

Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan political farce, and a dangerous, malicious provocation – Ma Zhaoxi, China Vice Foreign Minister

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

International

Nigeria, Japan Move to Set Up Industrial Hub to Unlock Investment

Published

on

Nigeria, Japan Move to Set Up Industrial Hub to Unlock Investment

…Abuja seeks Japanese capital, technology transfer as Tokyo promises faster visa processing

By: Michael Mike

Nigeria is seeking to establish a joint industrial and investment hub with Japan to attract foreign capital, accelerate technology transfer and position local businesses to tap into Japanese supply chains and the wider African market.

The proposal, put forward by the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu, signals Nigeria’s push to turn 66 years of diplomatic relations with Japan into a stronger economic partnership driven by investment, industrialisation and job creation.

Odumegwu-Ojukwu made the proposal during a bilateral meeting with Japan’s Ambassador to Nigeria, Suzuki Hideo, urging Tokyo to work with Nigeria on a practical roadmap for the proposed Nigeria–Japan Industrial and Investment Hub.

The initiative is expected to facilitate joint ventures, connect investors with credible Nigerian businesses, promote skills development and encourage Japanese companies to establish stronger industrial links with Africa’s largest economy.

The minister stressed that existing bilateral agreements must translate into concrete investment commitments and measurable development outcomes, rather than remain diplomatic declarations.

“The outcomes of the Forum must be translated into concrete programmes, investment commitments and measurable development outcomes,” she said.

She urged both countries to implement the agreements reached at the 10th Nigeria–Japan Special Partnership Forum, held in Abuja on August 27, through practical programmes and regular consultations between their foreign ministries.

To strengthen private-sector participation, Odumegwu-Ojukwu called for more partnerships between Nigerian and Japanese companies through joint ventures, local content development, skills transfer and the integration of Nigerian businesses into Japanese supply chains.

She also sought greater engagement by the Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO) to link Japanese investors with Nigerian enterprises and public-sector partners.

Beyond manufacturing and trade, Nigeria is seeking Japanese investment in solid minerals, gas development, cleaner energy technologies and industrial decarbonisation, with the minister highlighting the strategic importance of resilient energy and critical-mineral supply chains.

The proposed investment push comes alongside Japan’s development cooperation in infrastructure, healthcare, agriculture, education and technical training through the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA).

Odumegwu-Ojukwu welcomed a $10 million JICA-supported initiative to strengthen Nigeria’s startup ecosystem through catalytic capital and institutional development, in partnership with the Nigeria Sovereign Investment Authority.

She also called for sustained Japanese support for peacebuilding, humanitarian assistance and stabilisation in Nigeria and West Africa, reaffirming Nigeria’s commitment to regional stability through the African Union and the Economic Community of West African States.

On mobility and business exchanges, the minister urged continued dialogue to resolve visa-related challenges affecting businesspeople, students, researchers, government officials and tourists.

Responding, Suzuki said Japan was desirous of deepening cooperation with Nigeria, which he described as a strategic African giant.

He also assured that visa-related issues would be handled expeditiously, an undertaking that could help facilitate business and people-to-people exchanges between the two countries.

Odumegwu-Ojukwu said the existing cordial relations between Nigeria and Japan offered an opportunity to build a more dynamic partnership anchored on investment, industrialisation, technology transfer and shared prosperity.

The renewed engagement comes as both countries seek to move beyond decades of diplomatic relations towards stronger commercial ties, with the proposed industrial hub emerging as a potential platform for converting bilateral goodwill into investments and economic opportunities.

Nigeria, Japan Move to Set Up Industrial Hub to Unlock Investment

Continue Reading

International

Cuba Accuses US of Pressuring Nations Ahead of UN Vote on Blockade

Published

on

Cuba Accuses US of Pressuring Nations Ahead of UN Vote on Blockade

By: Michael Mike

Cuba has accused the United States of mounting a campaign of diplomatic pressure against countries supporting calls for an end to its decades-long economic blockade, alleging that Washington is seeking to influence the outcome of an impending United Nations General Assembly vote.

Cuba’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Ernesto Soberón Guzmán, made the allegation on Friday while condemning a US-organised event scheduled for October 19 at the UN headquarters in New York, which he described as an attempt to divert international attention from the debate on the blockade.

The Cuban diplomat alleged that the event, titled “Cuba Libre”, was part of a broader effort to weaken support for a Cuban-sponsored resolution calling for an end to the economic, commercial and financial restrictions imposed by Washington. The resolution is scheduled for consideration by the General Assembly on October 27 and 28.

Speaking to UN-accredited journalists, Soberón accused the US of using political and diplomatic pressure to influence the positions of member states ahead of the vote, including alleged direct appeals by Secretary of State Marco Rubio to heads of state and government.

He described the reported contacts as an attempt to interfere with the sovereign decisions of UN member states, insisting that countries should be allowed to determine their voting positions without intimidation.

The diplomat also questioned the format of the October 19 event, citing restrictions on press access, the non-disclosure of panellists’ identities and a prohibition on attendees expressing their views.

He argued that the arrangements suggested an attempt to control the narrative rather than facilitate an open exchange of perspectives on Cuba.

Soberón said the Cuban delegation had obtained copies of the invitation and concept note despite not being invited to the event.

He further questioned the use of UN premises for an activity he alleged was designed to advance Washington’s political objectives against another member state, citing administrative instruction ST/AI/2019/4 on the use of UN premises and the need for activities to comply with the principles of the UN Charter.

The Cuban representative also accused Washington of applying a double standard by organising the event while having outstanding contributions to the UN’s regular budget.

Beyond the diplomatic dispute, Soberón drew attention to the economic consequences of US sanctions, particularly measures affecting Cuba’s fuel supplies and international trade.

He recalled that US President Donald Trump signed an executive order on January 29, 2026, introducing measures targeting countries supplying oil to Cuba, which he blamed for a sharp decline in fuel shipments to the island.

According to figures he presented, Cuba had received only one oil tanker from Russia in the preceding 10 months, describing the shipment as humanitarian assistance.

He also claimed that approximately 7,000 containers destined for Cuba remained at international ports because shipping companies were reluctant to transport them over fears of possible US sanctions.

Soberón linked the difficulties to further measures announced by Washington on May 1, 2026, which he said expanded the threat of sanctions against companies and countries maintaining commercial relations with Cuba.

He criticised the US-organised event for failing to address the reported impact of the restrictions on the Cuban economy and the living conditions of its population.

The Cuban government has consistently opposed the US embargo, which has remained a major point of contention between the two countries and has repeatedly featured in General Assembly debates.

Soberón maintained that the October 19 event should not distract the international community from the substantive question before the General Assembly: whether the United States should end its economic, commercial and financial blockade of Cuba.

He urged UN member states to uphold the principles of the UN Charter, resist political coercion and exercise their voting rights independently.

The United States has historically defended its Cuba policy on grounds including concerns over the island’s political system and human rights record, while Havana argues that the sanctions violate its sovereignty and impose severe economic hardship on its people.

The forthcoming General Assembly debate is expected to renew international scrutiny of the longstanding dispute.

Reaffirming Havana’s position, Soberón said Cuba would not change its stance because of external pressure, adding: “Cuba is not a threat. The blockade is.”

Cuba Accuses US of Pressuring Nations Ahead of UN Vote on Blockade

Continue Reading

International

Uphold the Four Principles toPromote Lasting Peace and Stability in Africa

Published

on

Uphold the Four Principles to
Promote Lasting Peace and Stability in Africa

By Yu Dunhai, Chinese Ambassador to Nigeria

The world is undergoing accelerated changes unseen in a century, with profound shifts in the international balance of power. Africa’s peace and development face both new opportunities and challenges.

On the one hand, African countries’ sense of independence continues to grow, and their desire for unity, self-reliance and improved livelihoods is stronger than ever.

On the other hand, hotspot issues on the continent persist and recur, deeply affecting the people of the region. These issues have complex causes. Resolving them and settling disputes requires building consensus and pooling collective strength.
Recently, when meeting with President Faure Gnassingbé of Togo, Chinese President Xi Jinping put forward four principles for constructive participation by all parties in resolving African hotspot issues: upholding African leadership, safeguarding equity and justice, ceasing hostilities and building peace as well as addressing both symptoms and root causes.

These principles provide clear guidance for tackling hotspot issues in Africa and exploring a path toward lasting peace and stability. They fully demonstrate China’s understanding of and support for Africa’s efforts to carry forward Pan-Africanism, independently safeguard peace and security, and redress historical injustices. As Chinese Ambassador to Nigeria, I would like to share my understanding of these four important principles.

First, we must uphold African leadership. President Xi Jinping pointed out that the African people are the true masters of the continent and should therefore play a central role in regional affairs.

China supports African countries, the African Union and sub-regional organizations in upholding self-confidence and self-reliance, pursuing unity and development, and drawing on African traditions and wisdom to effectively address the various challenges facing the continent.

History has repeatedly shown that externally imposed “prescriptions” often fail to suit local conditions. Only by respecting Africa’s independent choices and listening to African voices can lasting and effective solutions be found. China adheres to the principle of sincerity, real results, amity, and good faith in its relations with Africa. It never interferes in Africa’s internal affairs, never imposes its will on others, and always respects the principal role of African countries and peoples.

China firmly practices the approach of “African solutions to African problems.” As Africa’s most populous country and an important member of ECOWAS, Nigeria has long worked to maintain stability in West Africa and has demonstrated the responsibility of a major country in mediating regional disputes, combating extremism, and building regional consensus.

China highly appreciates these efforts and will, as always, support ECOWAS and other sub-regional organizations in playing an important role in mediation and good offices.

Second, we must safeguard equity and justice. President Xi Jinping stressed that parties involved should observe the purposes and principles of the UN Charter, respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the countries concerned, practice true multilateralism, uphold a vision of common, comprehensive, cooperative and sustainable security, take into account the legitimate concerns of all sides, and seek fair and reasonable solutions.

Equity and justice are basic norms of international relations and a shared aspiration of African countries. Applying double standards in regional affairs, frequently interfering in internal affairs, or imposing external will only create new instability and ultimately undermine lasting peace.

Safeguarding territorial integrity and sovereignty and combating terrorism are matters within the sovereign rights of African countries. The international community should respect the independent choices of African nations and provide constructive support and assistance on the premise of respecting the countries concerned.

China firmly supports the African people in all their legitimate efforts to safeguard national sovereignty, security, and development interests, and opposes any attempt to interfere in the internal affairs of African countries under the pretext of hotspot issues.

Third, we must cease hostilities and build peace. President Xi Jinping noted that war and unilateral sanctions are never solutions to disputes between countries. Dialogue and consultation are the right way forward.

We should leverage platforms and mechanisms led by the Global South, such as the International Organization for Mediation, to engage in mutual respect and extensive consultation, seek common ground while reserving differences, and pursue mutual understanding and accommodation.

At present, the security situation in the Sahel and Lake Chad regions remains complex and severe. Countries in these areas face multiple security challenges, including terrorism, extremism, and cross-border crime, with various risks intertwined and compounding one another. No single country can address these challenges alone; greater cooperation and consensus among all parties are needed. China firmly supports the UN Security Council and the international community in upholding an objective and impartial stance, actively encouraging talks and conducting mediation on African hotspot issues.

China supports regional countries in bridging differences and building synergy through dialogue and consultation, jointly strengthening the barriers of regional peace and security, and creating a favorable environment for Africa’s stability and development. China stands ready to provide support within its capacity to African countries in enhancing peacekeeping and counter-terrorism capacity-building through the implementation of the Global Security Initiative.

Fourth, we must address both symptoms and root causes. President Xi Jinping emphasized that addressing immediate security concerns should go hand in hand with long-term development planning.

China stands ready to continue sharing the new opportunities of Chinese modernization with African countries, advance cooperation in agriculture, industry, poverty reduction, green development, science and technology, and other fields, support the sustainable development of regional countries, and enhance exchanges and mutual learning among civilizations, so as to lay a solid foundation for lasting peace.

China has always held that development is the master key to solving all problems. Security and development are mutually reinforcing and inseparable. Without a stable security environment, development is impossible. Without sustainable development, the foundations of security will remain fragile.

Nigeria is an important African economy with a large population and a wealth of young people. Accelerating industrialization is both an urgent developmental need and a fundamental guarantee of lasting peace and stability. China is ready to help Nigeria and Africa advance industrial transformation and the process of industrialization and modernization through concrete cooperation, achieving security through development and peace through cooperation.

Africa is a continent full of hope. Its future should and will be written by the African people themselves. China and Africa are good partners, good friends, and good brothers who share weal and woe. No matter how the international landscape changes, China will always stand firmly with Africa. Standing at a new starting point in building a China-Africa community with a shared future in the new era, China will continue to work with Nigeria and other African countries to firmly implement the four principles, actively promote the political settlement of hotspot issues in Africa, continuously deepen practical cooperation in various fields, jointly strengthen security barriers and unlock development momentum, and write a new chapter of peace, development and win-win cooperation on the African continent.

Uphold the Four Principles to
Promote Lasting Peace and Stability in Africa

Continue Reading

Trending

Verified by MonsterInsights